Obama’s America: Disarm the Public and Put Assault Weapons in the Hands of DHS Agents

Photo Credit: DonkeyHotey In yet another huge blow to the rhetoric and narrative of the Obama administration and its desire to disarm the American public, a DHS bid has been uncovered showing that the Department of Homeland Security recently put out an offer to purchase 7,000 full-auto “assault weapons” to be used domestically, inside the USA.

Keep in mind that President Obama is on the record saying, “AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals; that they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities.”

But it seems he really means they don’t belong on the streets of our cities unless they are in the hands of homeland security enforcers, in which case they can be FULL-AUTO assault weapons.

The DHS bid for 7,000 full-auto assault weapons is found by clicking HERE

The juiciest part of this bid is the use of the phrase “Personal Defense Weapons” to describe the full-auto AR-15s being purchased by DHS.

Read more from this story HERE.

  • Jeff

    I would be interested to know what arms manufacturers are biding on this if any ?

    • CaptTurbo

      I waded through a bunch of the PDFs and saw no mention of who will be bidding.

  • Homer

    IF this does not show anyone who is in doubt about this rouge govt, that they desire to take over this nation, then someone is as blind as a bat backing into a blizzard w/both eyes shut!

  • Homer

    Historical facts: see the book Geath by un Control by Aaron Zelman/Richard W. Stevens. These facts are that WHEN any govt has power over its constituatnts, it will always take control, and any nation that is able to give the people what they want is well able to take what it has given back from the people (T, Jefferson) They want guns in their hands and they want them out of our hands…thats tyranny!!

  • CaptTurbo

    Just keep in mind that an unconstitutional law is not a law at all. They cant ban our firearms. Shall Not Be Infringed means what it says.

  • Obama would disarm America

    We all know of sons and daughters of friends and family who died from drugs. Our Hollywood crowd is constantly in rehab. Many comedians , even the talented and goodhearted Ellen DeGeneres do comic routines about drugs. And yet Obama and the media have tried to use the shattered bodies of school children to disarm America.

    I don’t know any children slaughtered in schools. But I have had to comfort too many parents who have lost children to drugs. Obama had no problem making those same children slaves to ObamaCare and leaving them with their share of his growing national debt ($50,000/per child ).

    I suggest that we add a 28th Amendment to the US Constitution stating our right , as individuals ,to bear arms in no uncertain terms. It should guarantee our rights to due process,( which Obama and Bush II took away) and to have legal rights to challenge being on any no-fly or no-gun list the authorities may trump us to disarm us. Only then should we have to register our firearms.

    Our rights are God Given. Our rights don’t depend on the whims of people like Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein as to how and who they think should be able to defend their homes and families! My rights should not depend on a packed supreme court that seems to favors illegal aliens, murderers and felons over those people with a clean record. And once again, our 2nd. Amendment rights has NOTHING to do with hunting deer!

  • TELL ME – Why is a department, mainly focused on domestic threats, buying these? Is there a terrorist army coming? Are we going to be invaded? I have a gut feeling they are meant for those of the general populous who will fight Obama’s gun grab.

    • Kent2012

      you know full well that these weapons are to be used to gun down Real Americans when they have had enough of the communist towel head kenyan boy and his group of America haters

  • Jeff

    After reading the article about Obama’s litmus test he is conducting of our military leaders whether they will or will not fire on American citizens I was very concerned. Now we see another step in his plan to take control , something has to be done but what ?

    • Kent2012

      we will know soon. If this “fire the Generals” keeps up……

  • KalevEfrayim

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present Federal Government of the Republic of the united States of America is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

  • Barry_Suxx

    “Full Auto” AR-15’s is somewhat of a misnomer. An AR-15 is Semi-Auto only. A ‘Full Auto’ version of this weapon is the militarized version; namely the “M-16”, but not simply an AR-anything.

    And contrary to the panic being “Ginned-Up” by the Lies and twisted logic from Leftist and Gun-Grabbing Freaks, I know of NO modern Army who actually goes into battle with “Semi-Auto Rifles”, yet has the stupidity to tell their Troops that they’re carrying “Assault Rifles”. (ain’t gunna happen)

    It kinda makes you wonder why our Authoritarian Regime and our Nazi-DHS is reportedly “Buying AR-15’s” instead of stating it correctly, like THEY would have stated it if on the other foot: “M-16 Assault Rifles”.

    • Kent2012

      my guess is that they are buying M-16s, that way kenyan boy’s new army of illegal immigrants will have something to shoot in the air when celebrating their new “citizenship”

  • Marine68

    Good!! they will run out of ammo that much sooner, and although they will eventually be able to buy more, The personnel needed to continue the waste will diminish with every fight. In Vietnam the Soldiers lifted their rifles over the edges of their positions over their heads and squeezed the trigger without seeing where those rounds were going. I suspect that our DHS Zombies will do no less. Guerrillas from ambush will aim and squeeze off a couple of rounds and run with substantially more accurate fire and affect.

  • bigdog137

    Interesting. Gee, I wonder what the fraud “president” has in mind? Think HE could pass a background check to get a firearm?

  • Dlhen1

    Paul Cook

    1222 Longworth House Office

    Washington, DC 20515

    Dear Congressman Cook,

    First, I would like to congratulate
    you on your election to Congress. The
    reason that I write to you today, is that for the first time in my life, I’m
    afraid for the future of my country. I
    have many concerns; however the one I wish to focus on today is the subject of
    gun control.

    Anyone with a soul is
    outraged at the murder of innocent children. As a father I can think of no
    worse fear then the loss of my child. The
    problems we see today are rooted in our society much deeper then the tool used
    to commit evil. When evil manifests its
    intent to bring harm, it will use whatever tool is obtainable.

    Our Constitution is the
    contract between the people of this nation.
    It clearly defines the authority of the government to do the business of
    the people and the rights of the people against encroachment by government (the
    Bill of Rights). As my representative to
    my government, I ask of you to voice my views, which I will layout in this

    The Second Amendment to
    the Constitution:

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the
    security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall
    not be infringed.”

    When one reads the Bill of
    Rights the term “shall not be infringed.” is only found in the Second Amendment. It’s fair to ask why would the founders place
    such a high value on the right to have a gun?

    The founding generation understood
    the lessons of history. Many of the
    founding generation experienced firsthand the oppression of the English crown. They understood that for a people to be free
    they must have the ultimate right of self defense.

    free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”

    – Thomas Jefferson

    “history showed that the way tyrants had eliminated a militia consisting
    of all the ablebodied men was not by banning the militia but simply by taking
    away the people’s arms, enabling a select militia or standing army to suppress
    political opponents. This is what had occurred in England that prompted
    codification of the right to have arms in the English Bill of Rights.”

    United States Supreme
    Court – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER, pg. 25

    It is very clear in those
    writings that the founders intended the Second Amendment as a means for the
    people to remain free and fully in charge and masters of their government.

    Quoting again from United States Supreme
    Court – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER, pg. 56-57.

    “… the inherent right of self-defense has been central to the Second
    Amendment right. The handgun ban amounts to a prohibition of an entire class of
    “arms” that is overwhelmingly chosen by American society for that lawful
    purpose. The prohibition extends, moreover, to the home, where the need for
    defense of self, family, and property is most acute. Under any of the standards of scrutiny that
    we have applied to enumerated constitutional rights, banning from the home “the most preferred
    firearm in the nation to ‘keep’ and use for protection of one’s home and
    family, would fail constitutional muster.””

    If this can be applied to
    a semi automatic handgun, it would not be hard to argue that it also applies to
    semi-automatic rifles of the AR-15 variety.

    “It may be
    objected that if weapons that are most useful in military service—M-16 rifles
    and the like—may be banned, then the Second Amendment right is completely detached
    from the prefatory clause. But as we have said, the conception of the militia
    at the time of the Second Amendment’s
    ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who
    would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home to militia duty.”

    – United States Supreme

    This is a Constitutional guarantee, an individual right, a
    fundamental right to keep and bear arms that cannot be infringed. To infringe upon that right the burden of
    proof to disallow this fundamental right rests with the government and with all
    the restrictions of due process. It’s understandable to restrict that right to
    those with criminal convictions and a propensity to violence, or those who have
    been proven to be mentally ill. It is
    reasonable to run a back ground check on a buyer to screen those restricted

    However to do a blanket restriction on a fundamental right
    is unacceptable. Too many in this country the Second Amendment
    is a line in the sand and as written is a warning “do not cross”. Those rights are not negotiable.

    As a Commissioned Officer in the United States Marine Corps,
    you took on many occasions an Oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies. I took
    that same oath and 30 years later I still look at that oath as a commitment to
    my country. The oath has no expiration date.

    Our National Cemeteries are full of patriots who made the
    ultimate sacrifice in defense of our Country and our Constitution. We cannot be the generation who allows the
    foundation of our Country, its Constitution to be trampled.

    As my Congressman, I ask that you hold firm to your principles. Hold firm to your oath of office and apply
    one common sense test to legislation that you vote on; is it Constitutional? It’s that simple.

    Senator Feinstein’s
    purposed legislation is counter to everything our Constitution stands
    for. It would in effect gut the Second
    Amendment to our Constitution to a point rendering it useless. But is that not their goal? It will make felons out of law abiding
    citizens and have absolutely no affect on the criminals who by their very definition
    will not obey the law. It will make it
    easier for the predator and more difficult for we the people to defend ourselves
    and family.

    Worse yet it will further divide this country and may in
    fact bring about a civil war. For many Americans
    the Second Amendment is a hard line in the sand. For the good of our country, I pray that
    government will not cross it. I use that
    word, NOT to communicate a threat, I use it because as I stated in the opening
    of this letter, for the first time in my life I fear for the future of our
    great country.


    David L. Henderson

  • wlllbjr5

    DHS personell elected, appointed, recruited or by whatever means ” ‘ Fraud prez bam ‘ ” uses to select people for service in the United States of America are required to swear or affirm an “oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America!” I want Congress to make sure the oath is not to the President of the United States of America or Commander -in chief! I also would insist all personell from head of the Department all the way down to the lowest servant of this country knows and understands this reqirement!
    Let’s all Stop—————– ” ‘ SHEER SEVERE TOTAL STUPID LUNACY! ‘ “

  • 1_Eddie_1

    Well, I guess if full automatic rifles are personal defense weapons, then semi automatic rifles should be just fine to keep in ones posession.

  • Robbie Wilsdorf

    I knew this would happen. My friends laughed at me when I said this would happen. Some people even called me paranoid.


    Do you supose we are buying them back from the Mexican cartel’s? Eric Holder may have a private stash he could let go at a quantity discount. Full auto has always been available to law enforcement and are very tightly controled. They will need them when they go into Chicago and LA and ask the black and latino street gangs to please turn in their weapons.

  • GSoros

    Looks to me like they’re opening the door for citizens to own ‘full auto’.