Obama’s Extremist Attorney General Nominee Says Illegal Aliens Have the Right to Work in the U.S.

Photo Credit: BreitbartOn Thursday, Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) announced that he would vote against the nomination of Loretta Lynch for attorney general based on her statement that she supported President Obama’s executive amnesty.

Sessions explained:

Unfortunately, when asked today whether she found the President’s actions to be ‘legal and constitutional,’ Ms. Lynch said that she did. I therefore am unable to support her nomination. My concerns are furthered by Ms. Lynch’s unambiguous declaration that ‘the right and the obligation to work is one that’s shared by everyone in this country regardless of how they came here.’

Unfortunately, many other Republicans did not share Sessions’ sentiments, tossing softball questions at Lynch throughout her confirmation hearing. Nonetheless, Lynch demurred from answering over and over again, abiding by the new rule that nominees must avoid giving honest answers lest they be held accountable for those answers.

For example, when queried about the legal difference between the case for same-sex marriage and the case for polygamy by Senator Lindsey Graham, Lynch simply refused to answer. “Senator,” she said, “I have not been involved in the argument or the analysis of the cases that have gone before the Supreme Court. So I’m not comfortable undertaking legal analysis without having had the ability to undertake a review of the relevant facts and the precedent there. So I certainly would not be able to provide you with that analysis at this point, but I look forward to continuing the discussions with you.” Right. (Read more about what the attorney general nominee said HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

  • CountryBoy

    She is just another , in a long list, of Anti-American Blue Collar worker in the Obama administration….

    When will America wake up to the fact that Democrats are NO longer for the Middle Class worker…

  • MikeyParks

    Doesn’t refusal to uphold the law disqualify this woman for the job? In what alternate reality can she be the Attorney General?

    • liberty49

      Only in the Obama administration is it OK for the top lawman of the United States to ignore the RULE OF LAW.

  • wandamurline

    The entire administration of Obama is governed by criminals, thiefs, liars, anti-americans, communists….if they were actually indicted they would all have a long wrap sheet….you see the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree….the ineligible in chief has corrupt people just like himself that he appoints….this woman will be worse than Holder if that is humanely possible.

  • reggiec

    I sent the following to Senator Sessions:

    Please ask Loretta Lynn if she will follow her oath of office, The Constitution and US law as listed below:

    ****

    The following is the oath of office for the president of the
    United States: “I do solemnly swear [or affirm] that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    All law enforcement, cabinet members and elected officials are required to take a similar oath to protect, defend and preserve our Constitution and faithfully execute our laws.

    Article 4 section 4 of the Constitution begins as follows: “The United
    States shall GUARANTEE (my caps) to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion.” (The Obama administration has refused to do this)

    A republic defined:

    Noun 1. A state in which the supreme power rests in the body
    of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them.

    “Guarantee” is a legal term more comprehensive and of higher
    import than either warranty or “security”. It most commonly
    designates a private transaction by means of which one person, to obtain some trust, confidence or credit for another, engages to be answerable for him. It may also designate a treaty through which claims, rights or possessions are secured.

    Title 8 United States Code 1103(a) (5) states the following: “The
    Attorney General shall have the power and the DUTY (my caps) to control and guard the boundaries and borders of states against the illegal entry of aliens.” (The Obama administration has refused to do this)

    Duty:
    A legal obligation that entails mandatory conduct or performance.

    Title 8 USC 1103 (a) (10) states the following: “In the event the
    Attorney General determines that an actual or imminent influx arriving off the coast of the United States, or near a land border, presents urgent circumstances requiring immediate
    Federal response”—he can authorize state and local agencies
    to assist in carrying out his duties to protect our borders. State and
    local agencies consist of local police, sheriff departments, and the
    National Guard. (The Obama administration has refused to do this)

    Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and
    Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):

    A person (including a group of persons, business,
    organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:
    * assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally
    in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or
    * encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring
    him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or
    * knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal
    convictions.

    Please copy and send the above to your US Senators.

  • ONTIME

    More selective law, mandate, fiat and edict…..obstruction of justice, non compliance and collusion bordering on outright treason…WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER HOLDER IN A SKIRT…

  • liberty49

    So what would be different from Eric Holder, an AG who refused to enforce our laws? Now Republicans are stupid enough to approve his sister-in-law who thinks illegals have a RIGHT to a job and who will continue to flaunt the RULE OF LAW!

  • Lloyd Revalee

    Why are we even considering an individual for high office, who believes that any illegal resident, invaders, enemies, etc., have the same rights as the citizens of the United States. This nominee is an enemy to our system of government and our way of life, and should not ever be allowed to hold any high office. Our Constitution is the Supreme Law Of The Lnd, and there is nothing whatsoever in that document, that gives those invading our country illegally the same rights as citizens. Tt seems that everyone has forgotten that ours is meant to be a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. We The People do have the power, if we all stand together, to force those we hire to represent us in Washington, to do as we want them to do. We hire them, and we can fire them. We can recall those that do not do the things they took an oath to do, and replace them with someone who will. Isn’t it about time we wield our power, and get our government back to where it should be. Isn’t it about time we demanded that those we elect, hire, live up to their oaths of office, and begin to support, protect, and enforce our Constitution?