16519203363_f716ffd3c7

Senior Senate Staffer Reveals the Marco Rubio Story You’ve Never Heard [+video]

By Julia Hahn. On today’s program of Breitbart News Daily, Donald Trump’s Senior Policy Adviser, Stephen Miller, shared his never-before publicly discussed insights into Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)79%’s duplicitous conduct during his push to get the Gang of Eight bill through the Senate . . .

For the first time ever, Stephen Miller explained exactly what Rubio did to Chris Crane and how he had deceived the nation’s ICE officers.


During the Gang of Eight press conference to introduce the bill, Crane had attempted to ask a question. Miller explains that Rubio watched as Chuck Schumer repeatedly refused to allow Crane to ask his question, and Rubio eventually oversaw Crane being removed from the press conference by Capitol Hill security. Miller said that Rubio:

… refused to meet with ICE officers throughout the process [of crafting the bill], even as he was meeting with open border special interests. At the very end, he [Rubio] had an optics-only meeting with [Chris Crane] the representative for ICE officers, in which he made a series of promises, every single one of which he broke and violated directly … When that same ICE officer and Marine went to a press conference to ask a question, Rubio — through his silence — was complicit in Schumer blocking [Crane] from asking a question and allowing him to suffer the indignity of being forced out of a press conference room — a man who had served his country in uniform, as a U.S. Marine — all to spare Rubio from the discomfort of being publicly questioned about why he had broken his promises.

Rubio saw them [Capitol Hill security] take Chris Crane and remove him from the room and said nothing. When he [Rubio] had a chance to show an iota of independence, one scrap of independence from Chuck Schumer, and side with an American Marine and ICE officer — Rubio chose to stand shoulder-to-shoulder, hand-in-hand, arm-in-arm with Chuck Schumer, as an American Marine was forced to suffer the indignity of being removed from Marco Rubio’s Gang of Eight press conference. That’s the story I want to tell today.

(Read more from “Senior Senate Staffer Reveals the Marco Rubio Story You’ve Never Heard” HERE)

______________________________

Rubio Contradicts Himself – Repeatedly

By Andrew Kaczynski and Christopher Massie. During the GOP debate on Saturday, Rubio repeated the same line FOUR times: Barack Obama knows what he’s doing.

Rubio was asked if he was too inexperienced — and attacked by others with the comparison that Obama was a one-term senator . . .

But Rubio’s line used to be different! It used to be that Obama has no idea what he’s doing.

“This is a choice between a guy that has no idea what he’s doing, and a guy that does,” Rubio said of Obama during the 2012 election, contrasting him with Obama.

On his Facebook, Rubio shared the same sentiment looking to a video of the comments at the time saying, “This isn’t a choice between two bad guys or one bad guy and one good guy, this is a choice between a guy that has no idea what he’s doing, and a guy that does.” (Read more from “Rubio Contradicts Himself – Repeatedly” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

  • People should NOT vote for Rubio (or Cruz for that matter) because neither of them are constitutionally eligible, and Rubio may have a pretty face and talk a good game like Obama, but he is a snake in the grass.

    • Fredrick Rehders

      The Donald’s mom was not a U.S. citizen, when he was born, either. Does it bother anyone else, that the RNC has repeatedly pushed Conservatives, like Carly Fiorina, off of the main stage, when allowing RINOs like Jeb Bush, Chris Christy and Kacsich, that she out polled and finished higher than, in Iowa to take part?
      Huckabee & Rand Paul saw the writing on the wall and dropped out. Why do we allow them to choose who gets a shot? We are as weak as the other party that is controlled by the unions.

      • Sorry Sir, but you are wrong. Trump’s mother, was born in Scotland, she became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1942, which was four years BEFORE Donald Trump’s birth in 1947, at Jamaica Hospital in Queens, New York, therefore, Donald Trump IS a “natural born” citizen. Cruz’s mother was a U.S. citizen when he was born in Canada, but not his father therefore, Cruz, not only is NOT a ‘natural born” citizen, but he also has dual citizenship with Canada due to his birth there, and he may even have Cuban citizenship through his father. His father did not become a U.S. citizen until 2005, many years after Cruz’s birth. Therefore Cruz is NOT constitutionally eligible to be either president or vice-president. Rubio is an American citizen having been born in Florida, but he is NOT a ‘natural born” citizen because neither of his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth. They did not become citizens until Rubio was four years old.

        • Fredrick Rehders

          I have not verified your info on Trump, but if it is true, you are correct, sir. I am not convinced of his Conservative values and his bombastic rhetoric does zip to clarify how he would lead, but if he is our candidate, I will vote for him, as staying home is allowing the Demonrats to flourish. We must reduce the size of gov’t. now!

          • If Rubio or Cruz end up being the candidate and you vote for either of them, you will be helping to end our Constitution. It would be better to go to the polls and write in the name of one of the other candidates. To vote for an ineligible candidate just for the sake of winning an election is WRONG.

          • Fredrick Rehders

            I took the liberty to click on your profile and read your previous posts. I am in agreement with everything and impressed with your documentation of NATURAL LAW, which was used extensively by our founders, when writing The Constitution.

          • Thank you. Back in the days of my training for the priesthood in the monastery, we learned a heck of a lot more than just religion. And for those who feel that members of the clergy should not be involved in politics, they should do some internet searching on the “Black robed Brigade”, to learn what part the members of the clergy played in the Revolutionary War. They just might be surprised. God Bless.

        • Naturalism

          Trump wasn’t born in New York, you rube. That’s the lie he tells idiots. He was born in southern Germany to two drifters, neither of whom were American. Everybody knows that except people who believe lies.

          Don’t believe me? Then why hasn’t he released his long-form birth certificate? Huh? Seriously, the King of the Birthers won’t release his birth cert? Why do you think that is? It’s because he doesn’t want you to know the truth.

          • Show me the evidence.

          • Naturalism

            Prove that I’m wrong. Prove it. And just answer the question, why does Trump refuse to show his long-form birth certificate? Why?

            It’s because he’s not an American, and he knows it, and he’s terrified that everyone will find out.

          • Sir, I do not have to prove the truth to you. If you wish to believe the lie, then God speed to you.

            “and with all the deception of wickedness for those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved. 11For this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they will believe what is false,”

          • deanbob

            Show me the evidence in THE LAW that Cruz is ineligible.

    • sandraleesmith46

      Right you are, Archbishop. On both counts.

    • deanbob

      Do you know better than the law? Harvard law professors and legal scholars have said the law is clear that Cruz is a natural born citizen. Even the State of Illinois has ruled Cruz eligible to be president. So until a court resolves the discrepancy between the constitution and the law ….

  • CaptTurbo

    For me Cruz is the only best choice. I don’t trust Marco Amnesty Rubio and Trump is a narcissist just like the Muslim we have squatting in our White House now.

    • Nels

      Cruz has pushed to expand the H1-B visa program, and at best his record on ending illegal immigration and reducing legal immigration is weak. He has never spoken out against allowing mohammedans into the US, for example, yet that was an obvious problem long before this current election. He looks like another internationalist to me.
      Trump is a narcissist? Maybe. Trump does seem to be able to behave decently toward others, which doesn’t sound narcissistic. Anyone who is willing to run for office is probably a sociopath or worse. Trump can’t be any worse than the others in that regard.

      • deanbob

        Have you ever gone to his website to see his policy (s)?

    • sandraleesmith46

      But Cruz is a Canadian wannabe, certainly not eligible under the natural born requirement! He knows that and claims to be so virtuous yet he is still running!

      • CaptTurbo

        The court rulings are out my dear and you are wrong. Go Ted Cruz!

        • sandraleesmith46

          No court rulings since the 1850s on this issue; so no, I’m not wrong; and Cruz is still not eligible.

          • CaptTurbo

            Wrong and stupid is no way to go through life.

          • Fredrick Rehders

            Can you provide a link to that mystery court case, Capt? Ms. Smith is referencing The Supreme Court and you can Google it!

          • CaptTurbo

            I wish I could. They came through my email box. The decisions were fresh though as in the last couple weeks.

          • Fredrick Rehders

            I know what you mean. They can’t post anything on The Net that isn’t true, you know. Bon Jour! (<;

          • CaptTurbo

            You misunderstand. The articles didn’t come from dickheads like you, they came from respected sources.

          • Fredrick Rehders

            Whoa, Capt! I wasn’t being disrespectful and I did not resort to name calling, but if you must, I prefer, Richard Cranium. Again, Bon Jour!

          • CaptTurbo

            I apologize and will nuke that post.

          • Fredrick Rehders

            No biggie, Pard! I saw some humor in it. I’m not happy with some of the RNC antics, as I favor Conservatives and they push RINOs.

          • CaptTurbo

            I agree but also fear populists like Trump. People fell all over the Muslim usurper because he had cool catch words and said what they wanted to hear. The crowd is never right whether the topic is politics of investing.

          • Fredrick Rehders

            Well, we certainly agree, there! I have a problem with Republicrats and NWO devotees, like Jeb Bush, Chris Christie and Kascich. I like Fiorina, but don’t know enough about her yet, though I have made a small contribution to her campaign. I hope she hangs on… the RNC has not been fair to her, but who expected them to? They anointed Jeb Bush, early on.

          • CaptTurbo

            I think the RINO establishment has given up on Jeb and are now behind Marco Amnesty Rubio. I don’t think Carly has a chance though she is certainly a good debater. I have made three donations to Cruz after giving up on Ben Carson. Ben can blame who or whatever he wants but in the end he is just not charming and flashy enough for the dumbed-down electorate. Cruz has been rock solid on the Constitution and I think that means everything if this battered republic is to survive.

          • Fredrick Rehders

            I really like Cruz as my Senator, but even if his “Natural Birth” goes unquestioned, because it would validate the precedent set by Obama, it would still be wrong. Two wrongs don’t make it right and I am a right-wing kinda guy. The end does not justify the means… yada, yada, etc.

          • CaptTurbo

            I wish I could find those links for you. Two courts just came out saying that he was qualified beyond question. That’s something that the America hating communist White House squatting Trojan Horse Muslim usurper never could come up with.

          • Fredrick Rehders

            Capt. Greta on Fox News said it and gave her source, but I didn’t catch the source, as my cell phone was ringing and I just missed it. Still, according to the Founders intent, he is not qualified and it would take a Constitutional Amendment to for sure do it, unless the Supreme Court legislates from the bench, which is wrong, but they have done it before and have refused to rule directly on it in the past.

          • CaptTurbo

            The future of the Substandard Court is all the more reason it is critical to get a Constitutional Conservative into that office pronto!

          • Fredrick Rehders

            Amen, to that! I just wish it could happen before next year. Obama has to go, first.

          • I believe it was the Iowa Elections board that claimed Cruz and Rubio to be eligible. They are either mistaken or out and out misleading the
            American people. Either way, they are not the Courts or Congress so what they say is legally meaningless.

          • Fredrick Rehders

            Probably using Obama as the precedent. I concur with you, sir. I see no legal change or convincing definition of “Natural Born”, that changes the intent of the authors of our Constitution.

          • I believe it was the Iowa Elections board that claimed Cruz and Rubio to be eligible. They are either mistaken or out and out misleading the American people. Either way, they are not the Courts or Congress so what they say is meaningless.

          • CaptTurbo

            No, it was court decisions not election boards.

          • I keep up on ALL things concerning politics, and I have NOT heard of ANY such Court decision.

          • CaptTurbo

            Looks like you missed this one. Imagine that.

          • I just completed an internet search, including Google, and no such case exists.

          • CaptTurbo

            I know that I saw the news on it and it wasn’t on FOX.

          • ArmyCombatVet

            It seems to have worked for you. Insulting other bloggers doesn’t support your premise. Cruz, in accordance with my extensive research, proves his dog don’t hunt! Whether you like it or not, the Rev. is absolutely correct in his findings based upon my exhaustive research!

        • What court Rulings? The original intent of the Framers of the
          Constitution is based on natural law and they intended that to be a
          “natural born” citizen requires that BOTH of the candidate’s parents
          MUST be citizens of U.S. AT THE TIME of the candidate’s birth. The U.S.
          Supreme Court agreed with the framers in several U.S. Supreme Court cases. The following are the Supreme Court cases that cite “natural born Citizen” as one born on U.S. soil to citizen parents:

          Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)
          “Vattel, who, though not very full to this point, is more explicit and more satisfactory on it than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, says: “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”

          Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
          “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As society cannot perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their parents, and succeed to all their rights.’ Again: ‘I say, to be of the country, it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen; for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. . . .”

          Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
          “The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.”

          United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

          “At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

          • ArmyCombatVet

            Rev. Gregori you absolutely correct, neither Cruz nor Rubio are constitutionally eligible to be on the ballot for the White House! Claiming that they are makes both of them guilty of felony election fraud. Rubio knows he was born of two immigrant Cuban national parents who were not even naturalized until after his fourth birthday. That is blatant criminal intent by this fraud!
            The founders, when they drafted the Constitution, relied on Vattel’s Law of Nations when drafting the Constitution. Jefferson, Madison, Washington, Franklin etc. all had copies that were used to guide the founders in drafting the Constitution!

            Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada on December 22, 1970 and remained a Canadian citizen until he officially renounced it on May 14, 2014 , eighteen months after taking the oath of office of office as a U.S. Senator. At the time of Cruz birth, Cruz’s father was a Canadian citizen and his mother was a U.S. citizen! According to the Canadian Citizenship Act, of 1946, also referred to as the “Act of 1947,” Canada did not allow dual citizenship in 1970! The parents would have to choose at that time between U.S. and Canadian citizenship. Ted Cruz did not renounce his Canadian citizenship until May 24, 2014. Second no CRBA, Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America was filed with the nearest embassy after the birth to document that the child was a U.S. citizen! Cruz could not have entered the U.S. legally without a CRBA or a U.S. passport, the later of which was not obtained until 1986! Unless a CRBA is released from the time of his birth in Canada registering Cruz as a U.S. citizen, then Cruz came to the U.S. as a Canadian citizen! Even assuming a CRBA was filed, the weight of the legal evidence indicates that Ted Cruz is a naturalized U.S. citizen because he was born outside the jurisdiction of the U.S. and obtained U.S. citizenship by an Act of Congress, (Art.1, Sec.8 of the Constitution). As a naturalized citizen he is not eligible for the Presidency, Article 2, Section1, Clause 5 of the Constitution!

          • There is also the fact that Cruz’s father did not become a naturalized U.S. citizen until 2005, many years after Ted’s birth.

  • jalee507

    I do like the Marco man, I think he is great big sham…

    • Fredrick Rehders

      Sounds like wisdom from The Cat In The Hat! (<;
      Good one!

  • liberty49

    Sounds to me like Rubio is still lying about his push for amnesty, enlarging the VISA program and allowing thousands of ‘Syrian refugees’ (ISIS) to enter our nation. No wonder the media and elite are backing him!

    • wandamurline

      Illegal aliens cost the American taxpayer approximately 187 billion a YEAR to house, feed, educate, and medicate….we could be saving that money to help our veterans who are living on the street. Big business wants these workers because they can pay them less and when they cannot support their families, the taxpayers get to take care of them….a win/win for the elists in business. So, if you want to start the deportation process, stop the freebies….they will leave just like the birds do when you take down the feeders…because that is why they are here for the freebies and I have yet to hear one candidate talk about cutting the illegals’ welfare.

  • spike

    If “anyone” accuses anyone else of lying or breaking a promise/promises – I cannot take it seriously unless there are some concrete examples. Just “they lie” – “he lied” – he “promised things and broke every promise”. There was not ONE example of a broken promise to back that statement up – come on!

    • Tony

      Rubio broke every promise he made to stop illegal immigration. One is, he joined Senator Schumer’s Gang of Eight to sanction Amnesty and a path to citizenship for the law breaking illegal immigrants. That’s the big one. There are numerous others, too numerous to list. Take your head out of the sand and look up his record. You Rubio supporters are in denial. Wake up and help protect the USA.

      • spike

        He backed a path to “legalization” not citizenship, per se. In truth I don’t understand how checks would work. Also I’m not sure if in that bill there was an absolute requirement that the illegal stream be stopped before doing anything more is done internally which he does supports now.

  • Tony

    When it comes to prevaricating, Marco Rubio makes Hillary Clinton look like a saint in a golden robe with a halo over her head. Rubio is a Hypocrite and will say anything, do anything, to get the GOP nomination for president. He is a fraud, can’t be trusted, never held a job in the private industry, and is a career politician. He carries a special dagger hidden in his pocket that is the perfect weapon for stabbing his “friends” in the back. Avoid him like you would avoid a plague.

    • sandraleesmith46

      There’s a LOT of that going around in the Repub field, it seems… See also Cruz, for starters.

  • Fredrick Rehders

    Does anybody care, that none of those top three are Constitutionally qualified to be president? Both parents must be citizens, at the time of the candidates birth, to be “NATURAL BORN”! The constitution doesn’t say “Native Born”. The requirement was to keep out anyone born with dual citizenship and therefore shared allegiance with another nation. The Demonrats and lame-stream media gave Obama a pass, because to them The Constitution is just an outdated ol’ document… they hate it, because it restrains big government. Will we preserve our moral values and liberty, or jus’ be Republicrats?

    • sandraleesmith46

      Apparently not enough of us, and none with the authority to do much about it.

      • Fredrick Rehders

        The Most Rev. corrected my post regarding Trump!
        Ted Cruz stated only that, Trumps mother was born in Scotland, but did not state she wasn’t a citizen at the time of The Donald’s birth. My bad, I bit on the inference and ASSUMED…. yada, yada.

        • sandraleesmith46

          It’s easy enough to do. I think most all of us do it at some point. Trump isn’t the answer, but he is at least eligible. Thank-you for owning your error.

    • It is my belief that those who do not meet the Constitutional requirement of being “natural born” citizens, should NOT even be allowed to campaign. By allowing them to campaign, the GOP is giving the American citizens the false impression that Cruz and Rubio are eligible.

      • sandraleesmith46

        No, they shouldn’t; but in this instance, the left, having foisted their ineligible candidate on us, now needs the right to elect another ineligible candidate to the office to “validate” their coup d’etat, and cement in place all the evil O has committed against America. So they won’t complain or challenge either.

  • Naturalism

    “Open borders” is a 100% solution to illegal immigration. If you don’t support open borders, then it must not just be illegal immigration that you oppose.

    • Fredrick Rehders

      You are, of course, playing word games, but technically correct. Conservatives oppose the trafficking of drugs, child & adult prostitution and all manner of other criminal activity, including enemies of the U.S. as well as those with contagious disease and those that have no sponsor, other than our welfare system to rely upon. Our sovereignty and our borders are important to the protection of our people, which IS the first responsibility of our government. The marauding Vikings of yesteryear were no respecter of borders and the consequences were dire.

      • Naturalism

        “You are, of course, playing word games, but technically correct.”

        I respect you. You are literally the first conservative (I assume) who has even understood the premise of my statement. Thank you.

        And I don’t support open borders. That would be crazy. I don’t support open borders because I oppose some immigration (and not other immigration). What I support, or don’t support, is unrelated to what is lawful.

        My point is NOT to promote open borders, it is to call out the lie that some people hide behind when they say they are only against “illegal” immigration. I request conservatives to say what they mean, and being “against illegal immigration” is not what they mean. It is a lie.

        • Fredrick Rehders

          You are a trip, Mr. Naturalism and not at all what I expected. Many folks call themselves conservative and haven’t a clue what it is, that they are suppose to conserve, just as many Progressives have no sense of that movements beginnings and it’s goals. We are mostly just “The Great Unwashed”, being led into servitude, by the ominous Powers That Be!

  • wandamurline

    The tea parties sent Rubio to the Senate to make changes and represent the conservative base….it took less than a year for him to get in bed with the “good ole boy” establishment in Washington….we probably need to look at his finances….follow the money….that always tells you when you have been sold out by your representation as there is no way possible to amass millions on a salary of $164,00 a year.