Obama Is Planning Something Sinister, and It Could Be His Most Dangerous Policy to Date

By B. Christopher Agee. According to South Carolina Republican Sen. Tim Scott, Barack Obama’s disastrous foreign policy platform is being punctuated with an act that could be especially dangerous for American citizens.

In an effort to keep a campaign promise, Obama recently confirmed his plans to shutter the Guantanamo Bay detention center in Cuba, which has housed terror suspects in the years since 9/11.


Instead of detaining suspects in that remote location, Scott explained that the current administration is planning to move these enemy fighters to facilities within the U.S.

“The president’s foreign policy has been an absolute failure,” he said, “and his willingness to close Guantanamo Bay and send the world’s worst enemy combatants to a location near some of us is simply the icing on a disastrous cake.”

His warning was also a call to action, specifically for voters to ensure Hillary Clinton does not become Obama’s successor . . .

Detailing what he believes are Obama’s failures in nations across the Middle East and beyond, he concluded that the situation would only be made worse by bringing our enemies into our nation. (Read more from “Obama Is Planning Something Sinister, and It Could Be His Most Dangerous Policy to Date” HERE)

_______________________________

Will Cuba Take Over Guantanamo Bay? Military Lawmakers Claim Obama Will Give Base To Castro-Led Regime

By Christopher Harress. The top military lawmaker in the House of Representatives is calling for assurances from President Barack Obama that Guantanamo Bay won’t be handed over to Cuba as part of a normalization package between the U.S. and the Raul Castro-led country. Rep. Mac Thornberry R-Texas, chairmen of the House Armed Services Committee, said Obama could make the announcement during a visit to the country later this month.

Thornberry sent letters dated Feb. 29 to Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, Secretary of State John Kerry and National Security Adviser Susan Rice, expressing concern “the administration may be pursuing secret negotiations over the future of Naval Station Guantanamo Bay in Cuba as it has acknowledged it did in the pursuit of normalized relations with Havana,” the Hill reported Wednesday. “It provides an ideal location from which to service, stage, and project U.S. military forces, secure the air and maritime approaches to the United States, undertake counternarcotics efforts and provide disaster relief.”

It was unclear from Thornberry’s letter if his concerns about Cuba taking over the prison included the 91 prisoners remaining at the base. The future of those still at the controversial prison, some of whom have been there since the detention facility opened in 2002, has been a point of contention between the Republicans and Democrats since Obama announced he would close it on his third day in office in January 2009. (Read more from “Will Cuba Take Over Guantanamo Bay? Military Lawmakers Claim Obama Will Give Base to Castro-Led Regime” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

  • RWS

    The headline misleads: Mr. Obama’s actions in this may be evil, but they also are fairly open, not hidden or mysterious, and thus not sinister.

    • Heyoka

      Yes but he hides the real intent here and that my friend is both evil and sinister.
      How quaint of you to use an argument by definition and leave out a key fact in determining if the term fits the definition precisely.
      This is exactly what Obama is doing. You must have had the same teacher….

      • RWS

        Perhaps my own point was mysterious! I meant to show that Mr. Obama’s intentions have been fairly clear from the outset: the effectual destruction of this “last, best hope of mankind”, the United States. Few but the willfully blind could have mistaken them.

        • KDC

          Mr. Obama? Oh, puke!

          • RWS

            One respects the office, if not the man.

    • ONTIME

      Your kidding……this A-hole is anything but transparent and he makes it a point to make end runs and practice deception…..

  • Naturalism

    He promised to close Gitmo, and was elected in a landslide. Then he was re-elected in a landslide. It’s hard to say the American people don’t support closing Gitmo.

    Am I to understand that goodly American citizens are shaking in their boots worried about a few middle-aged washed-up losers wearing jumpsuits behind concrete walls in supermax facilities from which no person has ever escaped, ever in all of history? That’s some wussy talk right there. Man up.

    • RWS

      ‘Difficult to believe that a spread of less than four percent is “a landslide”!

      It’s difficult, too, to think that all who voted for Mr. Obama did so with approval of each of his talking points. I wouldn’t be so brash as to say that a vote for Barry was a vote against Gitmo — especially when the man failed to “close [it] within [a] year” of inauguration, as he repeatedly asserted that he would.

      • Naturalism

        Yeah, well you know, he’s a law-abiding guy so when Congress passed a law preventing him from acting, he followed the law. He’s been trying to wriggle through a wormhole in the statute for a long time, and now he thinks he might have found a way. We’ll see.

        • KDC

          A law abiding guy? What country were you in for the last 7+ years?

          • Naturalism

            If he’s not law-abiding, why doesn’t he just close Gitmo like he wants to?

    • sandraleesmith46

      Fraudulent “landslides” don’t count as voter approval!

      • Naturalism

        Landslides are landslides. I mean, of course, an electoral landslide, not a popular landslide on the order of what, say, Reagan had. Those were amazing, total sweeps of the entire country. Still, +100 electoral votes is a landslide and Obama enjoyed two of them.

        • sandraleesmith46

          Fraud doesn’t make a “landslide”, just a LIE; like everything else the usurper in thief has done.

    • KDC

      I don’t support anything this administration does. How does that suit you?

      • Naturalism

        It suits me fine. I didn’t say I voted for him, either. (Although I did, twice, and it was awesome both times!) All I said is that closing Gitmo was a majority position during the two elections after the prison became an issue.

  • ONTIME

    It does not take much to entertain the thought that the Fraud in the WH is under another master and there with malicious intent…he certainly does give you all the ammo you need to want to remove him and investigate his background by exposing his precious credentials……

  • Linda

    barack obama is stirring up trouble so he can use that as an excuse to declare martial law & call off the election. God have Mercy & deliver us from the evil one occupying our White House !