The Democrats’ Midterm Motto Seems to Be ‘the Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves’

The Democrats’ midterm motto seems to be: “The beatings will continue until morale improves.”

Last week, Hillary Clinton and Eric Holder suggested that being uncivil and even inflicting violence upon those with whom they disagree is the Democrats’ way forward. This is nothing new.

In total embrace of their inner totalitarian, the Democrat Party leadership has entered the final stages of the logical end to their political game. And just like their economic, social, and foreign policies, the final stage is violence against humanity.

The democratic socialists have called for extreme confiscation of wealth in order to create government programs to shift the economic power away from those who earn money toward those who do not. This leads to anger and resentment in those who produce toward those who do not and eventually to a refusal by the best of the best to play along. The refusal to comply leads to a crippling of the economy, which leads to unrest, which leads to the perfect opportunity for a dictator to take control.

Just this week, the results of President Trump’s tax cuts and lift of Obama’s grossly irresponsible regulatory restrictions and have been made clear. People are buying things again because economic optimism is on the rise. You don’t have that with totalitarian regimes. In fact, one of the key reasons we had such an economic downturn during the Obama presidency was because he told us in word and action that we were no longer going to be a prosperous nation. Obama told us we were going to have to pay out our wealth — that though we are an industrious people, we didn’t deserve to reap the rewards of our efforts. We were supposed to give away our wealth to appease the rest of the world, especially those who were hostile toward us.

The foreign policy of the democratic socialists was displayed in the Obama era. Appeasement of dictators, wholesale abuse of our traditional foreign policy, and high regard for the enemies of our Judeo-Christian civilization — we probably will never know to what extent that the Obama administration sold this nation’s values and paid off its enemies. Any president was going to have a very tough go of it after what the Obama regime put in place.

The democratic socialists have turned education on its head and have rejected the science of biology and accepted the phony-baloney gender-bender agenda. Critics of which have been forced to sit on the sidelines of academia, and all references to God have been expunged from mainstream education in America. Their priorities of exalting certain minorities and women have led to severe resentment in white men in America who have been unfailingly preached to about their privilege and skin color since birth.

College students, emboldened by their extreme narcissism, shut down free speech, screaming epithets and bruising eardrums, provoking people who would otherwise be peaceful. This is the spiral of the totalitarian mindset. In a fake play for victimization, they are trained to provoke and sabotage in order to produce the result of pushing people to their limits.

The democratic socialists provoke, sow discontent, rub raw the resentment and differences between us, embrace dictators, pick the wrong side of everything, exalt the crooked, and kill the innocent, and yet we are to believe that the people who voted against their eight years of downward spiral are the problem?

Every policy coming from the Left increases the likelihood of totalitarianism. Individuals tend to resent that, because we know we are supposed to be free: free to think the way we do, free to act within the law, free to enter into contracts, free to eat lunch without being accosted, free — because we’re Americans.

The path of the democratic socialists is one of violence, and there are no two ways about it. That’s why they are not embarrassed and will not pull away from their violent talk and action. If they somehow win in November based upon their actions on display for all to see, they will think violence is the way forward. If they lose in November, they will think violence is the way forward. They will not learn a lesson. They have only one song and know only one dance. There is no compromise with these people, and there should be no appeasement of them either. (For more from the author of “The Democrats’ Midterm Motto Seems to Be ‘the Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves’” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Family of Student Allegedly Murdered by Illegal Alien Wants Justice for ‘Preventable Tragedy’

Thursday night on Fox News, Laura Ingraham interviewed the aunt of an American who was violently murdered by an illegal immigrant.

The suspected killer of Cristin Vargas’ 20-year-old nephew, San Antonio college student Jared Vargas, is an illegal immigrant who had been previously arrested and had violated his probation. An immigration judge gave him a voluntary deportation order, but he was not removed from the country before becoming a suspect in Jared Vargas’ death.

Ingraham asked Cristin Vargas how her family reacts to those who say highlighting violent crimes by illegal aliens is a scare tactic.

“It’s completely disgusting and it’s outrageous,” Vargas said. She thanked Ingraham for the opportunity to share Jared’s story.

“Hard worker is an understatement. He was always working full-time and going to school, sometimes working two jobs. And he had an uncanny ability to balance family, friends, work, school, always smiling,” she said. “Just an awesome kid.”

Ernesto Esquivel-Garcia, 20, is the illegal immigrant accused of murdering Jared Vargas. He should have been deported. In March 2017, Esquivel-Garcia was arrested for drunk driving. ICE put an immigration detainer on him, beginning deportation proceedings that would take a year to be completed. He was released on bond by an immigration judge in April 2017 and given 12 months’ probation in January 2018 as a condition of his release. On May 10, a warrant for his arrest was issued for violating the terms of his release. Esquivel-Garcia was given a “voluntary departure” order to leave the country by July 20, 2018.

Two weeks later, on May 25, he was arrested by ICE for the outstanding warrant and handed to local authorities. For unknown reasons, local authorities returned him to ICE four days later, and somehow he was released and reminded of his July 20 departure deadline.

On June 16, Jared Vargas was last seen leaving his job at a bar. Esquivel-Garcia was also an employee there, working illegally and using a false identity. Two days later, Vargas’ body was discovered in his burning apartment. Esquivel-Garcia was arrested on the scene, and after speaking with witnesses, police charged him with murder, arson, and abuse of a corpse.

“It’s just really difficult for us to process now from the outside looking into this and just seeing all the systemic failures as far as coming here illegally, working here illegally, living here illegally, continuing to break laws, commit crimes, and ultimately taking Jared away from us,” Cristin said.

“We’re very strongly positioned that this was a preventable tragedy, a completely preventable tragedy, and I think that that’s what’s most difficult as we continue to grieve and try to make some sort of sense of this,” she added.

Chip Roy, Republican candidate for Congress in San Antonio’s congressional district, has emerged as a champion for the Vargas family, having reached out to them and offered his support as he seeks office. Roy has worked to publicize Jared Vargas’ story and has made illegal immigration and border security a major theme of his campaign.

Cristin Vargas told Ingraham that Roy has been a “very bright light” in their world.

“He listened to our story, he cares about our story, we’ve developed a personal relationship with him, and it’s been really helpful to us to have someone that’s actually advocating for us,” she said.

Esquivel-Garcia remains in custody as the family of Jared Vargas awaits justice for his murder. (For more from the author of “Family of Student Allegedly Murdered by Illegal Alien Wants Justice for ‘Preventable Tragedy’” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Democrat Attacks Stay-At-Home Moms for ‘Leeching off Their Husbands’

Democratic Senate candidate Kyrsten Sinema, of Arizona, once described stay-at-home moms as leeches in a 2006 interview.

“These women who act like staying at home, leeching off their husbands or boyfriends, and just cashing the checks is some sort of feminism because they’re choosing to live that life,” she told Scottsdale nightlife magazine 944. “That’s bulls**t. I mean, what the f*** are we really talking about here?” . . .

In one video, Sinema is seen grimacing and shaking her head after saying that she ran for a position in the Arizona state legislature.

(Read more from “Democrat Attacks Stay-At-Home Moms for ‘Leeching off Their Husbands’” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Sorry, Anti-Gunners, Your Base of Support for Gun Control Is Being Chipped Away Again

Wait—isn’t 60 percent a solid number showing support for stricter gun laws? Yes, but support is dropping and my guess, like what happened after Sandy Hook, is that support will continue to drop until it returns to pre-Newtown levels: 47 percent. And that was with a Democratic president at the helm.

Sandy Hook was a tragic shooting that shook the nation, as did the February shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida, which launched a renewed wave of anti-gun activism. Former students David Hogg, Cameron Kasky, and Emma Gonzalez formed the face of their new movement. Support for gun control reached 25-year highs, but Stephen Gutowski of the Washington Free Beacon noted that support is dropping:

The Gallup poll of 1,019 adults, conducted between Oct. 1 and 10, found 61 percent of respondents support making gun laws stricter. That’s down 6 points from when Gallup asked the same question between March 1 and 8. At the same time support for the idea that gun laws should be kept the same increased from 28 percent to 30 percent and support for the idea they should be made less strict doubled from 4 percent to 8 percent.

Overall, opposition to stricter gun-control laws moved from 32 percent to 38 percent. Two percent of respondents said they had no opinion. (It’s unclear why Gallup’s raw numbers add up to more than 100 percent but the discrepancy is likely the result of rounding.)

Support for stricter gun control has wavered significantly over the last few decades. When Gallup first asked about it in 1990, support for stricter laws came in at an all-time-high of 78 percent. In 2012, support hit an all-time-low of 43 percent. Support for stricter laws has trended back up since 2012, but this month’s numbers may indicate it is receding once again.

(Read more from “Sorry, Anti-Gunners, Your Base of Support for Gun Control Is Being Chipped Away Again” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Judicial Watch Files Bar Complaint Against Lawyers for Christine Blasey Ford

Government watchdog Judicial Watch has filed a complaint with the Board of Professional Responsibility in Washington D.C. against the Democrat operatives who legally represent Christine Blasey Ford. Ford is the woman who testified in front of Congress during Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination process.

The filing was made after it was revealed during testimony that Ford was never informed by her attorneys, Debra S. Katz, Lisa J. Banks and Michael R. Bromwich, that staffers for Senate Judiciary Committee Chuck Grassley were willing to fly to her home in California, or anywhere she chose, for a private interview instead of public questioning. The offer was made after Ford said she has a fear of flying, despite regularly taking flights across the country and the globe.

“By not informing their client Dr. Ford that Sen. Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee offered in a letter to ‘fly female staff investigators to meet Dr. Ford… in California, or anywhere else, to obtain (her) testimony, Katz, Banks, and Bromwich violated the following District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct,” Judicial Watch released Friday. “Rule l.4(a) – A lawyer shall keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information [and] Rule 1.4(b) – A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.”

During her testimony, Ford stated she did not know the offer was made by Grassley’s.

(Read more from “Judicial Watch Files Bar Complaint Against Lawyers for Christine Blasey Ford” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Abortionist Claims Gosnell Movie Is a ‘Safety Risk’ for Abortion Doctors

The independent true-crime drama about notorious abortionist Kermit Gosnell made it into the Top 10 movies at the box office this past weekend, in spite of its limited release and the mainstream media’s attempts to have it blacklisted.

Days later, Gosnell continues to perform well–according to Box Office Mojo, the movie climbed even higher, reaching number 9 this week. . .

But in spite of the crowd-funded film’s strong success with audiences around the country, a prominent abortionist is sounding the alarm about Gosnell, calling the movie a “safety risk” for abortion doctors like himself.

In a scathing Wednesday op-ed for the Huffington Post, titled “Anti-Choice Activists Want You to Hate Abortion Providers Like Me,” abortionist Willie J. Parker called the film “a ripe opportunity for anti-choicers to peddle a familiar conspiracy theory about abortion clinics.”

“The movie’s title,” Dr. Parker wrote, “and the inflammatory and dehumanizing rhetoric of its promotional materials are disturbing. The film is deeply offensive and exploits the pain and suffering of women. The project seems designed to arouse outrage against doctors who provide safe and legal abortion care, and I believe it creates a safety risk for physicians, clinicians, clinic staff, clinic escorts and my patients.” (Read more from “Abortionist Claims Gosnell Movie Is a ‘Safety Risk’ for Abortion Doctors” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

This Might Be the Best Thing to Look Forward to in 2020

For those of us already weary from the 2018 midterms (and maybe with some leftover exhaustion from 2016), the thought of jumping back into a presidential election cycle early next year is, well, nothing short of absolutely dreadful.

But there will be at least one silver lining to look forward to during the primaries.

A story over at Roll Call details how potential 2020 Democratic primary contenders like former Vice President Joe Biden and Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Cory Booker, D-N.J., are already planning some forays into critical battleground territories outside their home turfs in places like Nevada, Ohio, and South Carolina.

This primary race is going to make some great television, folks. Here’s why:

In case anyone forgot in the midterm fog, the 2020 Democratic primary will mean politicians who have so far built their political brands on things like far-left open borders policies (and twisting the history of the Founding to push them); attacking a member of the intelligence community for doing her job after 9/11; all-out socialized medicine; grandstandingly comparing oneself to Spartacus; calling oneself Native American; and insinuating that Christian beliefs disqualifiy someone from an executive branch appointment are going to have to at least try to make their case to folks outside their leftist/liberal strongholds.

Think about it: Kamala Harris trying to sell amnesty policies to voters in Iowa or South Carolina; Elizabeth Warren trying to get past her Native American DNA fail to actual Native Americans in Arizona; Cory Booker trying to get past the “Spartacus” routine in Iowa.

And some of them are going to have a very hard time when they realize just how far-left policies, anti-Trump resistance tactics, and brazen identity politics actually play outside their deep-blue stomping grounds.

It’s going to be like a political hybrid of MTV’s “Road Rules” and Billy Crystal’s 1991 comedy classic “City Slickers.” That is, it’s going to be spectacular. (For more from the author of “This Might Be the Best Thing to Look Forward to in 2020” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Rosie O’Donnell: Send Military to the White House to ‘Get’ Trump

Rosie O’Donnell said on MSNBC Thursday that she wants to send the U.S. military to the White House to “get” President Donald Trump.

O’Donnell made the comments while appearing in a wild segment of Nicolle Wallace’s MSNBC show called “Deadline: White House.” O’Donnell was describing how she was depressed for a year after Trump was elected when she proposed a coup of the presidency.

“What I wrote on Twitter was we should impose martial law until we make sure the Russians weren’t involved in the final tally of the votes. … And people were like, ‘Martial law? What’s wrong with you?’” Rosie opined.

“He wants to send the military to the border,” MSNBC host Wallace quipped about Trump weighing the option of sending the military to the border to deal with the Honduran caravan of illegal aliens traveling toward the border. . .

Rosie, who has professionally feuded with Trump for years, did call for martial law to be imposed soon after Trump’s victory in 2016.

(Read more from “Rosie O’Donnell: Send Military to the White House to ‘Get’ Trump” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Democratic Operative Arrested for Allegedly Attacking Female GOP Campaign Manager

A Democratic operative was arrested in Las Vegas, Nevada on Tuesday night after he allegedly grabbed and shoved a female campaign manager for Republican gubernatorial nominee Adam Laxalt.

Witnesses say 50-year-old Wilfred Michael Stark III, of Falls Church, Virginia, grabbed Kristin Davison by the arm, pushing her into a room, and would not let go. He yelled and shoved a camera and his body at her and Laxalt, according to The Associated Press. The altercation left her with bruises on her arms and neck.

Davidson was arrested by The Las Vegas City Marshals and charged with misdemeanor battery. He was released Wednesday on $1,140 bail, the AP reported. Laxalt’s campaign said Stark works for American Bridge 21st Century, a political group founded by David Brock and funded by George Soros.

This is not the first time Stark has been arrested for his behavior as a political operative. In March, he was arrested for allegedly shoving an aide to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke — an incident American Bridge said Stark “adamantly” denied, Fox News reports.

He also reportedly followed Rep. Devin Nunes around Capitol Hill in June, prompting the Republican congressman to tweet a photo of what appears to be Stark standing nearby holding up a cell phone. (Read more from “Democratic Operative Arrested for Allegedly Attacking Female GOP Campaign Manager” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Court: Obama Admin Dodged State Laws to Get Illegal Minors Abortions

Last week, a federal judge in California dismissed a lawsuit the American Civil Liberties Union had filed in 2016 challenging the government’s award of grants to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops to provide services to unaccompanied minor illegal aliens and trafficking victims. In the lawsuit, the ACLU argued the grants violated the Establishment Clause because the Department of Health and Human Services allowed the Catholic organization (and its sub-grantees) to deny girls and women in their care contraceptives and abortion.

The court rejected the ACLU’s Establishment Clause claim in a methodical 34-page opinion, explaining that the federal funds were not used to endorse or advance religion. Further, as the San Francisco-based federal judge stressed, the government would transfer minors to other facilities if there were a conflict between the services sought and the religious tenets of the organization running the shelter.

uried in the middle of the court’s analysis was a shocking revelation: Obama administration officials transported pregnant minors in federal custody to New Mexico to obtain abortions in order to circumvent parental consent laws in other states.

An email exchange between two Health and Human Services employees in April 2014 exposed this disturbing fact. In discussing Maria, a pregnant minor held at a temporary shelter, possibly in Texas or Florida—the workers noted that Maria stated she wanted an abortion and did not want her parents to know that she was pregnant. At the time, Maria’s parents, who were to be her sponsors, were located in Florida. Maria was in the custody of the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement.

After learning Maria had requested an abortion, according to government emails, “two ORR field specialists looked into the abortion laws in both Texas and Florida and reported that the general rule in both states was that minors could not have abortions without parental consent (absent exceptions, such as obtaining a waiver from a judge).” The Texas field specialist then emailed other ORR staff members, explaining: “This is why termination of pregnancies are done in New Mexico due to the fact that currently (by law) there is no parental consent requirement.” (Read more from “Court: Obama Admin Dodged State Laws to Get Illegal Minors Abortions” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.