<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Joe Miller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joemiller.us/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joemiller.us</link>
	<description>Restoring Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:23:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media Power Defining Santorum by sara</title>
		<link>http://joemiller.us/2012/02/media-power-defining-santorum/#comment-4470</link>
		<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joemiller.us/?p=7700#comment-4470</guid>
		<description>NEWT !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEWT !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It’s Time to Hold the Obama Administration Accountable by Lizelot</title>
		<link>http://joemiller.us/2012/02/its-time-to-hold-obama-administration-accountable/#comment-4468</link>
		<dc:creator>Lizelot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joemiller.us/?p=7668#comment-4468</guid>
		<description>Methinks the mainstream press are either completely hoodwinked by the Left, bought off, or both.  Have you noticed the insanely high contracts these lovelies sign for intoning the news?   Most of these news anchors/columnists would have a hard time finding a mid management position in private industry and have no obvious talents beyond looking presentable and mouthing whatever is set before them.   Having such a cushy job does make one rather prone to toe the line, doesn&#039;t it?   And we actually believe these mouthpieces?   Shame on us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks the mainstream press are either completely hoodwinked by the Left, bought off, or both.  Have you noticed the insanely high contracts these lovelies sign for intoning the news?   Most of these news anchors/columnists would have a hard time finding a mid management position in private industry and have no obvious talents beyond looking presentable and mouthing whatever is set before them.   Having such a cushy job does make one rather prone to toe the line, doesn&#8217;t it?   And we actually believe these mouthpieces?   Shame on us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul on Social Conservatism: The States should be in charge, not the Feds by Claudio Gomes</title>
		<link>http://joemiller.us/2012/02/ron-paul-on-social-conservatism-i-think-its-a-losing-position/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio Gomes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joemiller.us/?p=7648#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>Just because one says abortion is wrong doesn&#039;t means that he is against abortion. Ron Paul never voted to fund Planed Parenthood. Santorum did. Pharisee sounds right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because one says abortion is wrong doesn&#8217;t means that he is against abortion. Ron Paul never voted to fund Planed Parenthood. Santorum did. Pharisee sounds right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alaskan Islands Belong to Russia?  A Conversation with Joe Miller by Lizelot</title>
		<link>http://joemiller.us/2012/02/alaskan-islands-belong-to-russia-a-conversation-with-joe-miller/#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>Lizelot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joemiller.us/?p=7684#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>Somehow, I find it troubling that apparently none of our administrations, be they Dem or Rep, deemed it necessary to involve our congress nor Alaska in these &quot;negotiations&quot;.    It seems we&#039;re veering more and more away from  the stated Constitutional rights and responsibilities, arrogating more and more to the President and his minions.  This sets bad precedent, and in law it&#039;s all about precedent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, I find it troubling that apparently none of our administrations, be they Dem or Rep, deemed it necessary to involve our congress nor Alaska in these &#8220;negotiations&#8221;.    It seems we&#8217;re veering more and more away from  the stated Constitutional rights and responsibilities, arrogating more and more to the President and his minions.  This sets bad precedent, and in law it&#8217;s all about precedent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul on Social Conservatism: The States should be in charge, not the Feds by Claudio Gomes</title>
		<link>http://joemiller.us/2012/02/ron-paul-on-social-conservatism-i-think-its-a-losing-position/#comment-4465</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio Gomes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joemiller.us/?p=7648#comment-4465</guid>
		<description>Why do you think RP International politics are goofy? Great deals of experts agree with him. Do you think that the CIA head of the Osama Bin Laden Unit is goofy? He agrees with Ron Paul. One think you pro war people don&#039;t understand is that our country doesn&#039;t have money anymore to keep making wars and policing the world. But if you want war so much, make your congress to declare war. Presidents should declare war (That would be a monarchy) That is his point. What is the problem in following the constituition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you think RP International politics are goofy? Great deals of experts agree with him. Do you think that the CIA head of the Osama Bin Laden Unit is goofy? He agrees with Ron Paul. One think you pro war people don&#8217;t understand is that our country doesn&#8217;t have money anymore to keep making wars and policing the world. But if you want war so much, make your congress to declare war. Presidents should declare war (That would be a monarchy) That is his point. What is the problem in following the constituition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul on Social Conservatism: The States should be in charge, not the Feds by Doug</title>
		<link>http://joemiller.us/2012/02/ron-paul-on-social-conservatism-i-think-its-a-losing-position/#comment-4464</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joemiller.us/?p=7648#comment-4464</guid>
		<description>Marriage is the last of our worries. And Paul is for traditional marriage, he just doesn&#039;t care to force it down everyone elses throat nationally. He has RESPECT for the Constitution and the limits on Federal power telling people what to do. There is no reason to have the Gov&#039;t to get involved at all. Marriage should be left to the conscience of those who vow... and to their churches, not to the bureaucrat of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marriage is the last of our worries. And Paul is for traditional marriage, he just doesn&#8217;t care to force it down everyone elses throat nationally. He has RESPECT for the Constitution and the limits on Federal power telling people what to do. There is no reason to have the Gov&#8217;t to get involved at all. Marriage should be left to the conscience of those who vow&#8230; and to their churches, not to the bureaucrat of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul on Social Conservatism: The States should be in charge, not the Feds by Doug</title>
		<link>http://joemiller.us/2012/02/ron-paul-on-social-conservatism-i-think-its-a-losing-position/#comment-4463</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joemiller.us/?p=7648#comment-4463</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul does not have a &quot;Goofy&quot; stance on international politics. He has Ronald Reagan&#039;s  stance. Reagan was not an interventionist. Yes, he built up the War machine a bit too much and Paul fairly critizises him for that, but Reagan would stand with Paul against sending more troops to the mid East.  Even after our marines were attacked , Reagan withdrew troops from the mideast saying we didn&#039;t need to get into sectarian violence, as there was no national or strategic interest. Ron Paul has the traditional Conservative  stance. No War unless attacked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul does not have a &#8220;Goofy&#8221; stance on international politics. He has Ronald Reagan&#8217;s  stance. Reagan was not an interventionist. Yes, he built up the War machine a bit too much and Paul fairly critizises him for that, but Reagan would stand with Paul against sending more troops to the mid East.  Even after our marines were attacked , Reagan withdrew troops from the mideast saying we didn&#8217;t need to get into sectarian violence, as there was no national or strategic interest. Ron Paul has the traditional Conservative  stance. No War unless attacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video: Apparent Romney Supporters Caught Taking Down Santorum Signs by Dale</title>
		<link>http://joemiller.us/2012/02/video-apparent-romney-supporters-caught-taking-down-santorum-signs/#comment-4462</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joemiller.us/?p=7679#comment-4462</guid>
		<description>The gentleman who is in the process of stealing property not his is, clearly is in violation of the law. I am amazed that the law enforcement officer on scene is not either causing this activity to cease at the least and not enforcing the law by effecting an arrest. Finally, the fact that the individuals are refusing to identify them selves and/or answer any questions leaves no doubt as to who is behind this blatant illegal and improper activity - Mr. Romney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gentleman who is in the process of stealing property not his is, clearly is in violation of the law. I am amazed that the law enforcement officer on scene is not either causing this activity to cease at the least and not enforcing the law by effecting an arrest. Finally, the fact that the individuals are refusing to identify them selves and/or answer any questions leaves no doubt as to who is behind this blatant illegal and improper activity &#8211; Mr. Romney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video: Palin says media getting &#8220;wee-weed up&#8221; over Santorum&#8217;s Satan remark by siteunseen</title>
		<link>http://joemiller.us/2012/02/video-palin-says-media-getting-wee-weed-up-over-santorums-satan-remark/#comment-4460</link>
		<dc:creator>siteunseen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joemiller.us/?p=7721#comment-4460</guid>
		<description>There is a concerted effort to demonize Religion and belief in Jesus Christ, the Resurrection, and Redemption, as well as Penance for sin.  The Cult of Science or should I say the Cult of Darwinians is leading the pack of these Lamestream idiots.  I just wonder if any of them has read Cardinal Wiseman&#039;s &quot;Connection Between Science and Revealed Religion&quot; Delivered in Rome and dated 1852.  Very, very good analysis on the Bible and Science as not at variance, and he can actually prove through languages that there was one language and how they developed into many.  He was quite proficient in this study, but didn&#039;t have the time to concentrate on it as much as he would have liked to, since he was a Cardinal and doing his work for the Church.  This was an extra side line of thought and study which he developed and put together.  You&#039;ll never hear about this but rather only Darwin&#039;s Theory of Evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a concerted effort to demonize Religion and belief in Jesus Christ, the Resurrection, and Redemption, as well as Penance for sin.  The Cult of Science or should I say the Cult of Darwinians is leading the pack of these Lamestream idiots.  I just wonder if any of them has read Cardinal Wiseman&#8217;s &#8220;Connection Between Science and Revealed Religion&#8221; Delivered in Rome and dated 1852.  Very, very good analysis on the Bible and Science as not at variance, and he can actually prove through languages that there was one language and how they developed into many.  He was quite proficient in this study, but didn&#8217;t have the time to concentrate on it as much as he would have liked to, since he was a Cardinal and doing his work for the Church.  This was an extra side line of thought and study which he developed and put together.  You&#8217;ll never hear about this but rather only Darwin&#8217;s Theory of Evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alaskan Islands Belong to Russia?  A Conversation with Joe Miller by Joe Miller</title>
		<link>http://joemiller.us/2012/02/alaskan-islands-belong-to-russia-a-conversation-with-joe-miller/#comment-4459</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joemiller.us/?p=7684#comment-4459</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your feedback, Mr. Zink.  The claims against Wrangle, Jeannette, Henrietta and Bennett (I don&#039;t think we have much of a case on Herald) arose in 1881, after the 1867 Treaty. As to the Russian Federation&#039;s intent to be bound by USSR commitments, neither the USSR nor Russia ratified the maritime agreement.  We are operating under a &quot;proposed&quot; treaty, nothing more. It&#039;s also worth noting that even if we&#039;re wrong on all seven claims, the fact is that Alaska has been frozen out of the process and deserves a seat at the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your feedback, Mr. Zink.  The claims against Wrangle, Jeannette, Henrietta and Bennett (I don&#8217;t think we have much of a case on Herald) arose in 1881, after the 1867 Treaty. As to the Russian Federation&#8217;s intent to be bound by USSR commitments, neither the USSR nor Russia ratified the maritime agreement.  We are operating under a &#8220;proposed&#8221; treaty, nothing more. It&#8217;s also worth noting that even if we&#8217;re wrong on all seven claims, the fact is that Alaska has been frozen out of the process and deserves a seat at the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

