27638178716_c53b6933b0_b (1)

PC Kills: Will the West Ever Wake up From the Delusional Approach to Jihad?

A jihadist attacks individuals in the public square of a Western town.

The media refuses to provide a description of the attacker, reporting only the weapon he used.

A physical description of a man of African, South Asian, or Middle Eastern descent leaks out in the ensuing hours.

Law enforcement authorities deliver a press conference confirming the attacker’s Islamic name and stating that at this time, his motive is unclear.

Rumors on social media percolate about the man screaming “Allahu Akbar.”

Mainstream reporters ask local Muslim community leaders and neighbors about the attacker. They express universal shock, describing him as a decent man who might have been rough around the edges but never showed signs of being a terrorist. The man came from a middle-class family, liked playing video games with friends, and by all accounts lived a normal existence. Toward the end of the stories, those close to the attacker note that he had grown increasingly devout in recent years.

Bloggers begin to research and quickly find that the attacker was a member of a mosque led by an imam who had been recorded preaching hatred and violence toward the West. The attacker posted violent verses from the Quran and railed against the “Crusaders’” wars in the Levant on social media pages captured by screenshot before they were taken down. It emerges that he had spent months in the Middle East during recent years.

Several days later, law enforcement authorities report that the attacker in fact appears to have been a terrorist. But he had no direct ties to IS or Al-Qaeda, so there is no reason for alarm.

Politicians plead with the public that this man perverted one of the world’s great religions – Islam, “the religion of peace” – and that his acts were “non-Islamic.” They urge us all to come together in a shared belief in tolerance and diversity. Love trumps hate. Lone wolves are a fact of life, and their efforts only underscore the need for community engagement to “counter violent extremism.”

How many times are we in the West going to see the above script play out before something changes?

How long will we live a naïve fantasy in which we act as if all is well as the global jihadist movement metastasizes, bringing the violent murder of infidels to our shores?

If the murder of 3,000 innocents on American soil has not caused the West to openly and honestly examine who the enemy is and what animates him, and to develop a comprehensive strategy that mobilizes all of our resources and capabilities to defeat him, do we expect anything to change the next time we experience a mass attack?

Meanwhile, those who do understand the enemy are dismissed as cranks or called bigots. Those who assert that jihad is the motive – that violent subversion with the goal of world domination is justified by core Islamic texts, as the jihadists themselves clearly illustrate – are told to pipe down.

If you offend by speaking truth, you will cause violence. Shut up, and maybe you can keep your head.

Government service predicated on an understanding of the theopolitical Islamic supremacism that animates jihadists is simply out of the question. Heaven forbid that national security and foreign policy officials have any understanding of the Sharia law that both de facto and de jure governs the lives of hundreds of millions of people worldwide.

What will it take for the West to flip this script?

To date, murder, bloodshed, and fear abound. In spite of that fact, much of the West would rather cling to a narrative that makes it feel good about itself than recognize the reality of a global jihadist menace that threatens its very survival. This insane delusion will continue to have fatal consequences until we wake up. (For more from the author of “PC Kills: Will the West Ever Wake up From the Delusional Approach to Jihad?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Flag_of_Jihad.svg (1)

Meet the Shady Terror Supporter Welcomed by Georgetown University With Open Arms

Is a prominent academic institution empowering Islamic despots to propagandize college students?

Georgetown University’s satellite campus in Doha, Qatar recently hosted a man convicted of aiding and abetting a terrorist group Tuesday evening for a talk on “Youth In The Middle East.”

Sami Al-Arian, who spoke Tuesday, has reportedly called for Islamic warfare and has encouraged suicide bombings in the name of God. Nonetheless, Georgetown gave the Kuwait-born alleged terror mastermind a prominent platform, describing him as a “civil rights activist.”

The Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) notes that Al-Arian is a board member of Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a U.S.-designated terrorist group. Founded in 1979, the jihadist group is committed to the destruction of Israel through warfare. Considered even more radical than the terror group Hamas, it is widely believed that most of the group’s funding comes from Iran.

Reached for comment, IPT President Steven Emerson told CR he was concerned Georgetown would allow a man convicted of aiding terrorism “who still spouts the same evil and poisonous ideology (as) when he ran the Islamic Jihad” to speak on campus. He further described it as “one of the most hideous things” that an institution of higher learning could do, as it “represent[s] the core fundamental moral values it intends to impart to its students.”

In 1995, following a suicide attack that killed 19 Israelis, Al-Arian reached out to a Kuwaiti politician to solicit funds for more terror operations. Al-Arian said, according to IPT:

“The latest operation, carried out by the two mujahideen who were martyred for the sake of God, is the best guide and witness to what the believing few can do in the face of Arab and Islamic collapse at the heels of the Zionist enemy.”

He continued:

“I call upon you to try to extend true support of the jihad effort in Palestine so that operations such as these can continue, so that the people do not lose faith in Islam and its representatives.”

Al-Arian was deported in 2015 as part of his 2006 plea agreement, in which he pled guilty to providing services to Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Despite this guilty plea, Georgetown makes no mention of Al-Arian’s nefarious activities. The Georgetown profile whitewashes his extremism:

“Al-Arian is a prominent Palestinian human rights advocate and community leader. While working as a tenured professor of computer science … he was pursued by the U.S. government on various charges, resulting in a prolonged legal battle over which he eventually prevailed. After years in detention, solitary confinement, and under house arrest, Al-Arian relocated to Turkey in 2015.”

So how does Al-Arian get invited to speak at Georgetown Doha? To start, Al-Arian’s son, Abdullah, is an assistant professor there.

But the school’s Middle East hub is not its only location accused of promoting extremism.

Georgetown’s main campus in Washington, D.C. has an entire campus institution funded by a $20 million dollar donation from Saudi Arabia: the Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding.

“Georgetown has literally sold its soul to the devil — to terrorist funding ‘charities,’ to rich propagandists for the Muslim Brotherhood which built an entire wing at Georgetown in DC to propagate the values and beliefs of groups like Hamas and has been all too willing to form collaborative alliances with countries like Qatar,” Emerson commented, adding, “which is the largest state financial supporter of Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood and ISIS.”

Several professors at Georgetown’s D.C. campus have run into controversy of their own.

John Esposito, a renowned professor there, is affiliated with at least half a dozen groups connected to the Muslim Brotherhood. Additionally, when an alleged Muslim Brotherhood delegation came to visit the United States in 2015, Georgetown “organized and funded” the trip, according to the State Department.

Jonathan Brown, Al-Arian’s son-in-law and an Islamic studies professor at Georgetown, also is accused of recently endorsing rape and slavery in a February lecture on “Islam and The Problem of Slavery.”

By placing a man who may have led a Palestinian terror cell in front of unassuming college students, Georgetown has acted grossly irresponsible in empowering the forces of evil.

Georgetown University did not respond to a request for comment. (For more from the author of “Meet the Shady Terror Supporter Welcomed by Georgetown University With Open Arms” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.


6 Months After the Orlando Attack, Has the FBI Forgotten About the Terrorist’s Wife?

Six months ago, 29-year-old Omar Mateen walked into the Pulse nightclub in Orlando and committed the deadliest single-shooter mass shooting in American history.

The ISIS-inspired Mateen — born in New York to Afgan parents — stormed into the LGBT club on June 12 and massacred 49 people, wounding 53 more.

Evidence remains that his second wife and now-widow, Noor Salman, was an accomplice to the crime. Yet, she remains free and is believed to be in hiding somewhere in the United States.

For reasons unclear, federal authorities have not yet pressed charges against Salman and have kept the American people in the dark concerning this case since June.

Here’s what we know about the Palestinian-born Salman’s ties to the worst terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11.

Before the attack

Before the shooting, Salman reportedly drove with her husband all the way to Orlando — an hour drive from their home in Fort Pierce — to case several sites. That included the Pulse nightclub, she admitted to the FBI in the aftermath of the attacks.

At around the same timeframe, she was with Mateen when he stocked up on ammunition. Prior to the jihad at Pulse nightclub, Mateen added Salman to his life-insurance policy and made sure she had access to his bank accounts, additional reporting states.

The night of terror

Salman, 30, reportedly told the FBI that on the night of the attack that she feared her husband would do something horrible. But she did not alert authorities.

Moreover, Mateen specifically told his wife he was going to “carry out a jihadist attack.” Salman, however, has denied any prior knowledge of the Orlando plot.

“FBI investigators don’t believe Noor Salman was a co-conspirator in the attack that killed 49 people Sunday morning at Pulse,” CNN reported.

After the attack

Noor Salman reappeared in public view a few days later. With a grey sweater pulled over her face, she walked into the home she shared with Mateen and their 3-year-old son to gather their belongings.

Local news outlet WFTV reported on June 14 that Salman could be on the verge of arrest and charged as an accessory to the crime, but that arrest never happened.

On June 20, Attorney General Loretta Lynch shockingly revealed that she had no idea about Salman’s whereabouts. “I believe she was going to travel but I do not exactly know her location now,” Lynch stated. Her statement led to speculation that Salman had fled the country for Jordan or the West Bank. But it appears she is still somewhere in the United States.

The interview

Noor Salman broke her long silence in an exclusive interview with The New York Times on Nov. 1.

“She has moved three times since the attack, hoping to avoid the news media, and asked that her current location not be disclosed,” the Times story, with a dateline of “Washington,” reported.

Salman still denies any involvement or advance knowledge of the jihadi onslaught. That is in direct conflict with previous reports.

“A law enforcement official told ABC News that she may have known something about the incident in advance but claims she tried to talk him out of the assault,” reported on June 14.

She admitted in the NYT interview she knew Mateen had shown increasing signs of radicalization. Officials who secured his electronic records said he would frequently watch sermons by the late al Qaeda preacher Anwar Al Awlaki, and ISIS propaganda.

The New York Times positions Salman as a victim of Mateen’s domestic abuse who was simply “too busy trying to survive.” Nowhere in the interview does she discuss her reported comments to federal officials about casing possible attack sites with her late husband, and other evidence connecting her to the crime, claiming her lawyer would not let her discuss it.

“How can someone be capable of that?” Salman told the Times, concluding her interview, having addressed none of the circumstantial evidence connecting her to the crime.

What’s next?

A 2013 study of terror incidents in the United States and Europe found that in 64 percent of cases, relatives and/or friends had advance knowledge of the coming terror. Is Noor Salman a member of the 64 percent?

The FBI has not updated any information pertaining to Noor Salman’s status since late June. There is no publicly available information regarding a possible investigation, and when Conservative Review contacted the FBI to ask about any update to the case, a spokesperson said the Pulse investigation is still ongoing, and that policy does not permit them to comment on any ongoing investigation.

Our government has left the American people completely in the dark about a possible co-conspirator to the worst terror attack since 9/11. (For more from the author of “6 Months After the Orlando Attack, Has the FBI Forgotten About the Terrorist’s Wife?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.


Jihad on the Quad? Ohio State Attacker Reported to Be Somali Refugee

Multiple reports are now indicating that the Ohio State University attack could have a possible Islamic terror connection, as the suspect has been identified as a Somali refugee.

According to NBC, “The suspect’s name was not released, but law enforcement officials told NBC News he was an 18-year-old Ohio State student, a Somali refugee who was a legal permanent resident of the United States.”

CBS News corroborated that report.

Officials have identified the suspect as Abdul Razaq Ali Artan.

As Conservative Review’s Daniel Horowitz has previously noted, “Since 1993, we’ve admitted roughly 115,000 Somali immigrants nationwide — mostly through the refugee program — at an average clip of 10,000 a year. Almost 100 percent of them are Muslim. Minnesota is home to at least 30,000 Somalis.”

There are at least 38,000 Somali residents in Columbus, Ohio, alone. That number is second only to Minneapolis, which was the nearby scene of another stabbing rampage earlier this year, in which 10 people were wounded.

The story here is not, as some would make it, about guns and an “active shooter.” Rather, it is yet another example of an Islamic terrorist admitted to the United States without proper vetting. (For more from the author of “Jihad on the Quad? Ohio State Attacker Reported to Be Somali Refugee” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.


Among World Religions, Christianity Provides a Middle Way Between Jihad and Pacifism

Every heresy starts with at least a tiny mustard seed of truth. However great a distortion it is to say that Christianity preaches pacifism, non-violence, and passive surrender to the aggressions of other cultures, faiths, and ideologies, that notion begins with something real. There is a stark difference between Christianity and the religions that have surrounded it for most of its history. To put it another way: would we need a long article of to refute the idea that Islam is a pacifist religion?

Hardly. It won’t take that long. In fact, let’s go ahead and do it. The self-styled prophet Muhammad began by preaching his distinctive religion, which many scholars see as cobbled-together bits of Judaism and extreme Arian Christianity (which denies Jesus’ divinity), two creeds that were common in the region of Arabia where he grew up, all filtered through an intense tribal nationalism. The Arabs had been disorganized, dispossessed, and frequently governed by foreign rulers for many centuries, practicing either fractured and primitive forms of paganism, or faiths that came to them from other nations — such as Christianity and Judaism.

Islam: A Warrior’s Religion

Muhammad’s creed, by contrast, told them that Arabs were in fact the people of God, that God’s own Word had been written in their own language before all eternity and dwelt alongside Him in heaven. No translation of the Koran from Arabic into any other language is even considered authentic by true believers, merely a paraphrase. The holy place where all must come to pray would be in Mecca, not Jerusalem, and the whole Arab peninsula must be purged of every other religion. After a decade or so of preaching this message with little success in Mecca itself, Muhammad fled to Medina, where warring clans turned to him as a peacemaker — and a political savior. He began to reign over Medina as a theocratic king.

Suddenly, the constant stream of messages that Muhammad claimed to be hearing from the Angel Gabriel took on a quite different tenor. While he had been weak and almost friendless, God had told him to preach tolerance and peaceful coexistence with other religions. Once he had at his disposal significant wealth and an army keen for commerce raids and conquest, Muhammad began hearing messages of quite another sort. These later messages, he would explain to his followers, “abrogated” the first set of teachings: the God in whom he believed was perfectly free to change his mind. (Indeed, the Islamic concept of Allah leaves Him quite unbound by reason, logic, self-consistency, or even the duty to keep His promises — only His Will is sovereign, and it’s quite free to prove capricious.)

It was at this point that the Islamic faith we have come to know and love took the shape it has kept ever since: it’s a creed of conquest that claims the whole non-Muslim world consists of sinful rebels against Allah who deserve to be subjugated by force and either converted or killed — though reluctant exceptions are offered in principle (quite often ignored in practice) for other monotheists such as Jews and Christians. Those peoples are damned to hell in the next life, but in this one they may be left to live in peace, provided they accept absolute subjugation to the authority of Muslims, defer to them in every sphere of life, refrain from making converts or advertising their faith, and pay a special, heavy tax.

Muhammad put this creed into practice, leading armies into battle, raiding caravans to raise money, and after massacring unbelievers who resisted his offer of faith or subjugation, taking women and girls as sex slaves. To this day, Muslim men are restricted to “only” four permanent wives, but are free to keep as many captured concubines as they can kidnap in wars fought for Islam. This doctrine is used today by ISIS in Iraq and Syria to justify the sex slavery of hundreds of non-Muslim women and girls. Unfortunately, Muslims consider Muhammad as the “perfect example” of human behavior, which means that virtually everything he did is worthy of imitation. Since he married a nine-year-old, that means that strict Muslim countries make it legal for their men to do the same — as Iran did in 1979 after its Islamic Revolution.

Christianity: A Middle Way Between Jihad and Servile Passivity

The example set by Jesus is … different, to put it mildly. Jesus responded to religious authorities who challenged His authority by engaging them in debate. He preached that we must go beyond the Old Testament’s call for proportional justice (“an eye for an eye”), and that when insulted with a slap we should “turn the other cheek.” He ordered us to “love your enemy” and “pray for those who persecute you.” He told His disciples that when they preached His message and were rejected, they should just quietly leave town. When gendarmes of the corrupt Temple establishment had Him arrested, He forbade His disciples to fight them, even healing the single Temple guard an apostle had rashly wounded. Insulted and beaten by guards, He spoke not a word of rebuke. From the Cross He did not denounce His persecutors, but called on His Father to forgive them, because they knew not what they were doing.

Jesus issued a powerful challenge to our natural (but fallen) instinct to avenge every slight, humiliate our enemies, treasure grievances, and wait for a chance for vengeance — in other words, to follow the advice of Niccolo Machiavelli, whose politics manual The Prince was essentially a self-help book from the anti-Christ. But the contrast between Jesus and Muhammad can be taken much too far, particularly if we pluck Christ’s statements out of their proper context and misunderstand His mission in a way that turns out to be perversely self-aggrandizing.

Don’t Try to Compete with Jesus

Because here’s the thing: Jesus is not meant to serve as our example in every single way. We are not called on to overturn the existing interpretation of sacred scriptures, for one thing. (Imagine if every Christian showed up at church and preached, “The Bible says unto you X, but I tell you Y!”) Nor is each of us a prophet preaching a brand new covenant between God and man. Few of us miraculously heal the sick, give sight to the blind, or dispense forgiveness to sinners on our own authority. As bad as some liberal Catholic parish Masses can be, we don’t have the right to rampage through the sanctuary, overturning the altar and scattering the liturgical dancers. (Resist the temptation, okay?)

Most of us are not even called to poverty, chastity, and obedience — as many of the apostles were, on whom monks and nuns model their very special and rare vocations.

Most important of all, not one of us is called to be a pure sacrificial victim, going willingly to our deaths at the hands of unjust authorities so that our suffering can make reparation to the Father for the sins of all mankind. Really. No matter how righteous and altruistic you’re feeling at the moment, Jesus has been there, and done that.

While Jesus called on us to carry our daily crosses, He did not threaten to nail us all up to them. The infinitesimally small percentage of Christians who face the stark choice between renouncing Jesus or dying as martyrs are in some ways emulating Jesus, but even they fall far short: their deaths do not forgive sins, though they can offer their sufferings in union with Christ’s for the sake of other sinners.

We are not sacrificial lambs going peacefully to the slaughter out of obedience to the Father for the sake of man’s redemption. And martyrdom isn’t God’s plan for the human race — or else He would have told us so. A few Christians in the early Church, during the Roman persecution, got it into their heads that it was virtuous to seek out martyrdom and turned themselves in to the pagan procurators to claim a glorious Christ-like death. The Church Father St. Gregory of Nazianzus condemned them for their rashness.

Our Duty to Defend the Innocent, on Pain of Sin

The Catholic Church at least does not teach that we are to simply surrender our lives to anyone who attacks us. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, relying on St. Thomas Aquinas, defends the lethal use of force for the “legitimate defense of persons and societies”:

Love toward oneself remains a fundamental principle of morality. Therefore it is legitimate to insist on respect for one’s own right to life. Someone who defends his life is not guilty of murder even if he is forced to deal his aggressor a lethal blow: ‘If a man in self-defense uses more than necessary violence, it will be unlawful: whereas if he repels force with moderation, his defense will be lawful. . . . Nor is it necessary for salvation that a man omit the act of moderate self-defense to avoid killing the other man, since one is bound to take more care of one’s own life than of another’s.’” (2263-4)

Nor are we expected — or even permitted — to leave innocent third parties defenseless at the hands of violent aggressors. As St. Thomas points out in another passage quoted in the Catechism: “Legitimate defense can be not only a right but a grave duty for one who is responsible for the lives of others. The defense of the common good requires that an unjust aggressor be rendered unable to cause harm.” (2265)

We are called to use force, if need be at the risk of our own lives, to protect others. That responsibility has motivated Christian policemen, soldiers, and spies over the centuries. (For more from the author of “Among World Religions, Christianity Provides a Middle Way Between Jihad and Pacifism” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Watch How to Handle Your Local Jihadi Witnesses!

Jehovah’s witnesses come to my house nearly every Saturday. At best, they stay too long trying to convince me of their craziness. At worst, they get offended when I tell them that they’re wrong. Still, let’s put it in context. They’re mildly annoying, but they aren’t trying to kill me. Which is more than I can say for Jihadis. Just what would it be like if Jihadi Witnesses took the same tact? Watch below.

Have you heard the good news? Well this is the opposite. It’s the ‘bad news… terrible news.’ It’s the Jihadi Witness way! (See “Watch: Ding Dong! Jihadi Witnesses!”, originally posted HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Jihad Caucus: How Islamic Immigration to the US is About to Get Much Worse [+video]

The United States allows 70,000 people from all over the world to obtain legal permanent residence through our Refugee Program–one of the most generous in the world. We also bring in another 40,000 or so through the Asylum program. Then there is the Special Immigrant Visa for people from Iraq and Afghanistan–about 10,000 in FY 2014–and a Cuban/Haitian Entrant program bringing in another 20,000 annually. That adds up to about 140,000.

Many of these “refugees” come from Islamic countries like Somalia, Iraq and Iran, bringing with them at least the potential for terrorism, in many cases a contempt for our country and the almost universal edict among Muslims to dominate. Islamic supremacist Mega Mosques are being erected all over the country, vigorously supported by the Obama Justice Department, which runs interference for them over the objections of local citizenry.

It’s about to get worse. The Syrian civil war–enabled at least partially by Obama’s insane foreign policy–has created a refugee crisis, with approximately 2.9 million Syrians now living in refugee camps in surrounding countries. The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees wants the U.S. to accept 130,000 Syrians by the end of 2016. We have only taken 700 so far, but given the FBI’s warning that it cannot guarantee ISIS or other terrorists are not among the refugees, even that is too many.

Not to be dissuaded from such silly national security concerns, a group of 14 U.S. senators, led by the indefatigable Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, have written a letter to Obama urging him to allow 65,000 Syrians in as refugees. This would require a dramatic expansion of the refugee program, and virtually guarantee that a sizable number of ISIS fighters would slip in among them. Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy has given them the moniker “Jihad Caucus” because practically speaking, Jihad is what this request will bring.

The 14 senators demanding this massive influx of Syrians are:

Dick Durbin (D-IL)

Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)

Al Franken (D-MN)

Patrick Leahy (D-VT)

Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)

Patty Murray (D-WA)

Robert Menendez (D-NJ)

Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)

Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)

Christopher Coons (D-DE)

Tim Kaine (D-VA)

Edward Markey (D-MA)

Sherrod Brown (D-OH)

Mazie Hirono (D-HI)

These same 14 sent another letter in April Demanding action on the Syrians. These senators have truly earned the name Jihad Caucus. A few years back, Dick “Turban” Durbin, as he has been called, said U.S. troops guarding Guantanamo Bay prisoners, were Nazis. Sounds like a bit of projection to me. (See “The Jihad Caucus”, originally posted HERE)

Listen to an earlier interview with this author on The Joe Miller Show:

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

“Should We Get Rid of All the Jews?”: Megyn Kelly Accuses Bill O’Reilly Of “Catering to the Jihadis”

Photo Credit: Salon

Photo Credit: Salon

On “The O’Reilly Factor” last night, Megyn Kelly shamed host Bill O’Reilly for daring to criticize Pam Geller’s absolutist version of free speech, saying that he was “catering to the jihadis.”

The pair were discussing the shooting of two Islamic extremists in Garland, Texas, on Sunday when O’Reilly echoed Donald Trump and claimed that Geller and the American Freedom Defense Initiative “provoked” the attempted attack.

Geller and the AFDI — an organization that has been labeled a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) — were “trying to make a point about the First Amendment and free speech,” Kelly said, by hosting their “Draw the Prophet” contest at the same facility that had hosted a seminar on Islamophobia in January.

“So they wanted to defy the fear the jihadists have imposed on the world?” O’Reilly asked.

“On the free speech principle — on the First Amendment principle — she’s 100 percent correct,” Kelly responded. She claimed that the First Amendment was designed to defend “the most outrageous, offensive, incendiary speech — speech at the fringes, debate at the edges, things that make people upset.” (Read more from “Should We Get Rid of All the Jews?”: Megyn Kelly Accuses Bill O’Reilly Of “Catering to the Jihadis” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

White House Now Says Unemployment Causes Jihad [+video]

The Obama administration is drawing fire for suggesting that defeating ISIS requires more of a jobs program for terrorists than a sophisticated approach to killing them.

State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said Monday night on MSNBC that ‘we cannot win this war by killing them, we cannot kill our way out of this war.’

Instead, she said, the administration should ‘go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups’ – including ‘lack of opportunity for jobs.’

‘We can work with countries around the world to help improve their governance,’ Harf insisted. ‘We can help them build their economies so they can have job opportunities for these people.’

The embarrassing gaffe aired as the White House attracted new criticism for papering over religious aspects of a mass-beheading of Coptic Christians by the ISIS terror army. (Read more from “White House Says Unemployment Causes Jihad” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Murder Suspect on Personal Jihad May Mave Been Groomed in US

Photo Credit: KCPQ-13A man accused of killing four people in two states is believed to have ties to a disrupted terrorist cell, a terrorist training camp on U.S. soil, and federal investigations going back more than a decade, a Fox News investigation has revealed.

Details of Ali Muhammad Brown’s life in crime and connections to radical Islam prior to the killings of a college student in New Jersey and three other men in Washington state since April 2014 is under renewed scrutiny. After his arrest in July, Brown, 29, told detectives from both states that he “was engaged in jihad” and referred to the specific murder of one victim, Brendan Tevlin, as a “just kill.”

Tevlin, 19, was murdered in West Orange, N.J., on June 25 while sitting in his car at a traffic light. He was shot eight times. Besides Brown, two other men have been arrested in Tevlin’s murder — Jeremy Villagran and Eric Williams.

Seattle authorities say ballistics link the same 9-mm. handgun that Brown used to kill Tevlin in New Jersey to three other homicide investigations in Washington state. On June 1, 23-year-old Dwone Anderson-Young and 27-year-old Ahmed Said were killed “execution style” as they sat inside a car in Seattle, Wash.

The same weapon was used to gun down 30-year-old Leroy Henderson on April 27 as he walked the streets of Skyway, Wash., authorities say.

Read more from this story HERE.