Epstein Bombshells Still Buried as DOJ Drags Feet on File Release
When President Donald Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act on November 19, many believed a long-awaited public reckoning was finally at hand. The law required the Justice Department to release unclassified records related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein within 30 days, raising hopes that years of secrecy surrounding his crimes and associates might soon come to an end.
Instead, the process has moved at a crawl — and nearly two months later, the vast majority of the files remain hidden from public view.
The first release, which arrived on December 19 just before the Christmas holiday, consisted of a small and heavily redacted batch of documents. Rather than providing clarity, the records left many observers frustrated, offering little new information and raising fresh questions about what the government is withholding.
A second release followed weeks later, but even after two rounds of disclosures, officials acknowledge that less than 1 percent of the material under review has been made public.
The Justice Department insists the delay is the result of logistical challenges rather than intentional stonewalling. In a letter sent to federal judges this week, Attorney General Pam Bondi and other DOJ officials said the department is dealing with “inevitable glitches due to the sheer volume of materials.”
According to the letter, more than 500 federal prosecutors and staff members are now assigned to reviewing and redacting millions of pages from investigations into Epstein and his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell. Officials say they are making “substantial progress,” but declined to offer any timeline for when additional documents might be released.
Jay Clayton, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, wrote that the review has uncovered significant duplication across files, making it difficult to estimate the total number of unique documents. He added that the technical demands of processing such a large archive require constant attention.
So far, the material that has been released includes photographs, court records, and internal FBI documents. Some files revealed new details about the planning of Epstein’s 2019 arrest, while others showed that complaints about his behavior had been made to federal authorities years before formal investigations began.
What has not emerged, however, is what many advocates and members of the public expected: concrete evidence implicating prominent or powerful figures who associated with Epstein.
The lack of bombshell revelations has fueled suspicion among transparency advocates who pushed for the law’s passage. They argue that the slow pace and heavy redactions undermine the purpose of the legislation.
Epstein died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. Since then, questions about the full scope of his criminal network have persisted, along with demands that the government make its records public.
For now, those seeking answers remain in limbo — waiting to see whether the Justice Department ultimately delivers on its promise of transparency, or whether the Epstein files will continue to be released in small, carefully filtered fragments.
