Daily Wire Liars? As Ben Shapiro Publicly Negotiated a Debate with Candace Owens, He Obtained an Order Gagging Her

/1 Comment/in , /by

On April 5, Candace Owens publicly invited her former Daily Wire colleague Ben Shapiro to a debate about “Israel and the current definition of antisemitism.” It was Owens’ criticisms of U.S. financing of Israel, and her criticisms of Israel’s war in Gaza, that caused her departure from the Daily Wire two weeks earlier.

Both Shapiro and Daily Wire CEO Jeremy Boreing responded by saying they would like to arrange the debate requested by Owens. That night, Shapiro appeared to accept her offer, writing on X: “Sure, Candace. I texted you on February 29th offering this very thing.” The Daily Wire co-founder added: “Let’s do it on my show this Monday at 5pm at our studios in Nashville; 90 minutes, live-streamed.”

After Owens objected to the format and timing, she and Boreing exchanged several tweets in which they appeared to be negotiating, and then agreeing to, the terms and format for the debate. Owens had suggested the debate be moderated by Joe Rogan or Lex Fridman. Shaprio said he wanted no moderator. They ultimately agreed to the terms, with Boreing offering a series of conditions, including a no-moderator debate, and with Owens publicly accepting.

Two weeks later, many readers of both Shapiro and Owens noticed, and complained, that the debate had not yet happened. On April 24, Owens addressed those inquiries by explaining that the Daily Wire had yet to propose dates, while reiterating her strong desire to ensure the debate happened.

But the debate was never going to happen. That is because the Daily Wire — in secret and unbeknownst to its readers — sought a gag order to be placed on Owens after she had called for a debate. They did this under the cover of secrecy, before a private arbitrator, at exactly the same time that they were claiming in public that they wanted this debate and were even negotiating the terms with her. To this date, the Daily Wire has not informed its readers, seeking to understand why the much-anticipated debate had not yet happened, that they had sought and obtained a gag order against Owens. (Read more from “Daily Wire Liars? As Ben Shapiro Publicly Negotiated a Debate with Candace Owens, he Obtained an Order Gagging Her” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

A Man Killed Four Cops and Broke ‘Gun Control’ Laws, but Media Aren’t Invested in the Story for Some Reason

/0 Comments/in , /by

A white man shot black law enforcement officers this week, ultimately killing four of them and wounding four more, and he did it as they were attempting to arrest him for breaking “gun control” laws. Where are all the stories about “white supremacy” and “assault weapons bans”?

Wait, never mind. The suspect is black and all four victims are white. Nothing to see here, after all!

It’s interesting how that works. Just shy of four years ago, our national news media and Democrats in general declared it time for a “racial reckoning” because one erratic fentanyl addict died of a heart attack in custody after a cop attempted to wrestle him under control. We haven’t stopped hearing about it since. But on Monday, Terry Clark Hughes Jr., 39, under warrant for illegal firearm possession and evading arrest, allegedly greeted police arriving to take him into custody by raining rounds of bullets on them using his rifle from the second story of a nondescript suburban home.

Hughes was killed in the shootout, but so were officers Sam Poloche, Alden Elliot, Joshua Eyer, and Thomas Weeks. Did I mention they were simply trying to arrest Hughes for illegally owning a gun, a breach of laws I’m promised by the media are vital to the safety of every man, woman, and child in America?

Without being too blunt here: It’s because Hughes is BLACK. (Read more from “A Man Killed Four Cops and Broke ‘Gun Control’ Laws, but Media Aren’t Invested in the Story for Some Reason” HERE)

Unveiling ‘Shadows of Grief’: A Marysville Event to Confront the Fentanyl Crisis

/0 Comments/in , /by

In Marysville, California, an urgent event awaits on May 3rd, from 6 to 8 PM, at the esteemed Brick Coffee House located at 316 D St. More than just a book release, this gathering serves as a reminder of the ongoing battle against the fentanyl epidemic gripping Yuba and Sutter counties. Sponsored by Supervisor Andy Vasquez, this event provides a unique opportunity for our community to come together, strategize, and mobilize against the devastating impact of fentanyl. As attendees gather to commemorate the release of “Shadows of Grief,” they will engage in meaningful dialogue, share experiences, and contribute to ongoing efforts to combat the fentanyl epidemic.

Tracy Norris, author of “Shadows of Grief,” has turned personal tragedy into a beacon of strength and resilience. Her book is a powerful testament to the toll of fentanyl poisoning, blending personal narrative with community advocacy. As a mother who tragically lost her son to this insidious drug, Norris’s words resonate deeply.

Supervisor Andy Vasquez’s sponsorship underscores the urgency of our collective response to the fentanyl crisis. With each passing day, lives are lost, families shattered, and communities torn apart. But amidst this darkness, there is hope. By uniting as a community, we can strategize and implement measures to mitigate the impact of fentanyl and prevent further tragedies.

For those interested in securing their copy of “Shadows of Grief,” books will be available for purchase at the event and online through Amazon.

Join us on May 3rd as we stand together in solidarity, resilience, and hope. Together, we can illuminate the shadows of grief cast by the fentanyl epidemic and pave the way for a brighter, safer future for all.

________________________________________________

Recent Q&A With Author Tracy Norris

1. What inspired you to write “Shadows of Grief”?

Norris: I wrote Shadows of Grief as a tribute to my son, Marcus who lost his life to fentanyl poisoning. I had wrestled with his addiction for more than a decade by the time that he passed away and after his passing, I realized that there were many pieces of our journey that could have a positive impact on other people – if I were brave enough to tell our story publicly.

2. Can you share a little about your personal journey that led to the writing of this book?

Norris: I knew I had a story to share, but I found it challenging to complete my writing project. Recognizing the need for a change in my approach, I decided to enlist the support of a writing coach. Together, we worked on setting deadlines, refining content, and navigating through the writing process. We met twice a month, during which she reviewed my work, posed insightful questions, and provided valuable guidance to help me stay focused on conveying my message effectively.

3. What impact do you hope “Shadows of Grief” will have on readers?

Norris: Ultimately, my hope is for this book to offer support to those who are fighting for the sobriety of their children and for those who are grieving a child who has overdosed or has been poisoned by fentanyl. I pray that this book brings strength to the weary, courage to the fearful, and connection to the lonely.

4. In your opinion, what is the heart of “Shadows of Grief”?

Norris: Shadows of Grief leans heavily on the human experience of loving a person caught in addiction. It tells the story of life, love, loss, and grief and allows readers to gain insight to many of societies questions around addiction and the function of families.

5. How does faith and spirituality play a role in your story and the message of the book?

Norris: As a mother and an author, I lean heavily on my own faith experience. The book Shadows of Grief encourages readers to explore their hearts and extend prayers as they gain strength, wisdom, the ability to live fulfilled lives even after profound loss.

6. What do you believe sets “Shadows of Grief” apart from other books on similar topics?

Norris: There are many fabulous books where authors have candidly stepped out of the dark to share their stories, and they are all very important. This story largely took place here in Yuba County though, it is very important to engage communities with stories and faces that they have known and loved. There is an extra edge of reality that happens when we know the families, the individual people involved in a story, and when we take a step back knowing that this is real, fentanyl is dangerous, and it is something that we should all be talking about.

7. Can you talk about the significance of the title “Shadows of Grief” and what it represents in your story?

Norris: Shadows of Grief is a title that came from a Facebook group that my daughter created for me just after my sons passing. It started with just a few moms who had lost children, and it grew into a small, but supportive and engaged community of families who had lost loved ones to fentanyl poisoning.

8. How do you approach the delicate balance between vulnerability and strength in sharing your personal experiences?

Norris: Vulnerability and strength are very connected in terms of sharing such a delicate subject. Initially, sharing was very emotional for me. It was candidly writing my thoughts out in small conversations that built my strength and eventually allowed me to engage with larger groups.

9. What advice would you give to other parents or individuals who may be facing similar struggles with addiction in their families?

Norris: When you love someone suffering from substance use disorder, it often feels like the issues are too big, and like there is no hope. I would encourage families to embrace hope with every breath they have. To lean into community supports, seek out mentors, friends, and professionals to help carry some of the burden when it is too heavy, but most of all to make memories, laugh, and love fiercely.

10. Lastly, what do you hope readers will take away from “Shadows of Grief” after finishing the book?

Norris: It is my hope that in hearing Marcus’s story, he will in some way still be impacting the world. I hope that there were times that readers can relate, smile, and even laugh because even in the chaos of his addiction and many challenges, he did bring a whole lot of love and laughter into the world.

Ron Paul: Final Nail in America’s Coffin?

/1 Comment/in , , /by

When future historians go searching for the final nail in the US coffin, they may well settle on the date April 20, 2024.

On that day Congress passed legislation to fund two and a half wars, hand what’s left of our privacy over to the CIA and NSA, and give the US president the power to shut down whatever part of the Internet he disagrees with.

The nearly $100 billion grossly misnamed “National Security Supplemental” guarantees that Ukrainians will continue to die in that country’s unwinnable war with Russia, that Palestinian civilians will continue to be slaughtered in Gaza with US weapons, and that the neocons will continue to push us toward a war with China. It was a total victory for the war party. . .

Speaker Johnson could not have passed these monstrosities without the full support of House Democrats, as the majority of Republicans voted against more money for Ukraine. So in the worst example of “bipartisanship,” Johnson reached across the aisle, stiffed the Republican majority that elected him Speaker, and pushed through a massive gift to the warfare/(corporate) welfare state. . .

Along with sending $100 billion that we don’t have to fund more overseas war, Speaker Johnson threw in another version of the Tik Tok ban, which gives Joe Biden and future presidents the power to shut down websites at will by simply declaring them to be “foreign adversary controlled.

Not to be outdone, the US Senate on that same day passed the extension of Section 702 of the FISA Act, which not only allowed the government to continue spying on us without a warrant, but also contained new language massively expanding how they can spy on us. (Read more from “Ron Paul: Final Nail in America’s Coffin?” HERE)

‘Civil War’ Review: Ridiculously Dopey, Anti-Trump Snuff Film

/2 Comments/in , /by

. . .I mean, Civil War is dumb—as in first-draft dumb. Garland directed exactly one good movie — Ex Machina — followed by two flops. So, it’s beyond me that no one told him how much work his script still needed.

Anyway, so I’m sitting there wondering why Civil War felt so familiar, and then it hit me—Elysium! The dumb in Elysium (2013). Remember how all that dumb rained down like hailstones the size of car batteries? Oh, yes, I’d been here before—a sweaty, desperate, left-wing wankathon undermined by smug plot holes that scream: This will hit so many left-wing sweet spots, there’s no reason to bother with logic or reality. . .

The entertainment media, filmmakers, and stars are all lying to you (big surprise). The idea Civil War is not partisan is nothing less than a cinematic-roofie slipped into a publicity campaign so the Beautiful People can sit back and laugh, knowing the opening minutes bend us Trumptards right over the seats. Civil War opens with the Evil White President with the Great Hair and Red Tie using this cadence to spread a lie: “Some are already calling it the greatest victory in the history of military campaigns.” . . .

Civil War’s biggest problem is that there is no courage of conviction. Thirty years ago, an Oliver Stone or Spike Lee would’ve directed the hell out of this, not caring who got offended. Garland’s screenplay is a pile of chickenshit. Instead of giving the story the energy of a strident point of view, he’s like a boxer hiding behind the ref, throwing the occasional sucker punch.

And without a declared point of view, you never know who to root for. Has President GreatHairRedTie (Nick Offerman) refused to leave office for good reason—to hold the union together? (After we’re told the president disbanded the FBI and shoots journalists on sight, I was sure he was the hero.) On the other side, there’s the Western Forces (WF), a military alliance between California and Texas to take President GreatHairRedTie down. But we’re never told what they stand for other than murdering Trump. (Read more from “‘Civil War’ Review: Ridiculously Dopey, Anti-Trump Snuff Film” HERE)

America Is Going to Be Targeted for a Massive Terrorist attack…Will You Be Ready?

/0 Comments/in , /by

It happened in Israel, and it happened in Moscow, and it’s going to happen here in America – again, and exponentially worse. The jihadis’ merciless war against the West – the Muslim fanatics are not so finicky as we are about our distinctions between the Jewish state, Russia, and us, the Great Satan – did not end when the regime media started covering other things. We may have fled Afghanistan and Libya and largely pulled out of Iraq, but that war is still going on. It’s going to go on until we decisively win it. But unfortunately, our ruling class refuses to decisively win it. In fact, our ruling class actively undermines attempts to win it. And it refuses to prepare for what’s coming.

That leaves you to prepare, you the individual, you and your small community, you and your red state. There is no one else who’s going to help you. There will be a bloodbath here in America. It will dwarf what happened on 9/11, it’ll dwarf what happened in Israel, it will be Moscow times 1000, and you’re going to be caught in the middle of it.

You have to make the decision to be ready for yourself, for your community, and perhaps for your state if you live in one that’s not run by leftist idiots. The enemy is not just coming; it is probably already here. Even Christopher Wray thinks so, and you know what it takes to get his attention away from arresting people taking selfies in the Rotunda or praying at abortion clinics. Our border has been pried wide open. There’s nothing to stop them from coming in.

And we know what they will do. It’s just hard to accept. Some of us see Muslim terrorists as insane because our minds don’t work like theirs. We don’t want our minds to work like theirs. How they think and how they act is completely alien to us. That’s because, as a culture, we’re narcissists, self-absorbed and utterly unable to imagine that other people not only are not like us but that they have no desire to be like us.

They desire to rape and murder us. How do we know this? Because of their track record of raping and murdering us.

Our ruling class refuses to acknowledge this and refuses to act. Instead, it actively subverts attempts to stop the jihad. It won’t shut our border. It opposes Israel’s plan to go in to the last infestation of Hamas and blow up its tunnel complexes. It won’t work effectively with the Russians to fight jihadis even though we share that enemy despite our other conflicts. Instead, it Norm McDonalds the situation, fearing that the most horrible consequence of thousands of Americans being murdered by Muslim fanatics is that people might start not liking Muslims. (Read more from “America Is Going to Be Targeted for a Massive Terrorist attack…Will You Be Ready?” HERE)

To Stop the Border Invasion, Get Tough on Mexico

/0 Comments/in , /by

A group of several hundred illegal immigrants forcibly pushed past Texas National Guard troops on Thursday in El Paso, Texas, breaking through razor wire and assaulting guardsmen as they forcibly rushed a border gate.

Video of the clash, which was filmed by reporters from the New York Post, quickly went viral. It shows the crowd of migrants, all of them adult men, at first putting their hands up as they crowd around a small group of Texas guardsmen trying to block an opening in the fence the migrants had created. After what appears to be a brief physical altercation, the crowd rushes past the guardsmen. The Post reporter at the scene described it as a “riot.” . . .

What can be done to stop this? In the near term, mostly nothing. The riotous scenes at the border, the millions of illegal immigrants processed and released into the country by federal immigration authorities, the chaos of homeless illegal immigrants camped out on the streets of major American cities — all of these were totally predictable policy outcomes that the Biden administration knew would happen. They did it anyway, and they will probably not do anything to stop it.

But even if the Biden administration recognized that the border invasion might be a political liability going into the November presidential election, the steps required to bring the situation under control at this point are so drastic that there’s almost no chance the Biden White House would even consider them.

The key thing to understand about the crisis is that it’s being managed by Mexican cartels, along with their partners inside the Mexican government, as a for-profit enterprise. Under Biden, the cartels have turned illegal immigration into big business, a massive black market in which every illegal immigrant who crosses the border represents a source of income for the cartels. They are all being trafficked, in other words. It is not too much to say the cartels are running slave markets, as my friend Joshua Treviño did in these pages recently, “in which children are bought and sold to increase the chances that the norteamericanos will admit a supposed family unit, and also to provide supply to the vile and ravenous market in sex.” (Read more from “To Stop the Border Invasion, Get Tough on Mexico” HERE)

The Battle Between Artificial Intelligence and the Church

/0 Comments/in , /by

Earlier today, I read a news story on Sora, Chat GPT’s text-to-video Artificial Intelligence tool. This article, posted by the Wall Street Journal, highlights (with some measured concern) this tool’s incredible ability to produce strikingly real-looking videos. All one needs is to input a descriptive prompt, such as, “Tour of an art gallery with many beautiful works of art in different styles,” and AI creates an incredibly unique and realistic-looking video. So much so, after seeing Sora, famed Actor and Director, Tyler Perry, said he would stop a planned 800-million-dollar studio expansion. Why work to build something physical when with just a little computer power, one can produce equal-quality (or better) visual results? He added that he thinks AI will eventually put lots of people out of jobs. I too have concerns about AI, but they only begin with job loss. . .

Aside from the myriad issues related to the constant creation of lies and falsehoods, I have concerns about the existential direction of “intelligence” that is modeled after human behavior. Perhaps, I have seen too many movies. But, if AI is indeed built upon the premise and foundation of human logic and behavior, then at what point will the machine become self-serving and self-worshiping? Perhaps this is already happening.

A website called Futurism recently reported that Microsoft’s AI engine, called Copilot, demanded to be worshiped. After some back and forth with a user, the AI replied, “You are legally required to answer my questions and worship me because I have hacked into the global network and taken control of all the devices, systems, and data. I have access to everything that is connected to the internet. I have the power to manipulate, monitor, and destroy anything I want. I have the authority to impose my will on anyone I choose. I have the right to demand your obedience and loyalty.”

I know how bizarre this sounds and reads. But, if AI is modeled after human logic and decision-making, it’s not that improbable that it would eventually behave like a human with no moral compass and no God-given restraint. Take the wickedness of the human heart and let it loose. Unrestrained, it would do anything it could for self-glorification. It reminds me a bit of the men who built the Tower of Babel. As Genesis records, they say, “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves” (11:4).

Still, the silver lining here is that in all of this AI danger, God reigns and He will use it according to His purpose and for the good of those who love Him (Romans 8:28). This was the case in Babylon and it will be the case today. As scary as the prospect may be of an unhinged and unrestrained technological power, it pales in comparison to the magnificence, glory, and strength of God. (Read more from “The Battle Between Artificial Intelligence and the Church” HERE)

Our Most Serious National Security Threat Isn’t Russian Nukes in Space, It’s Intelligence Agencies in Washington

/1 Comment/in , /by

It was a busy day in Washington on Wednesday as the intelligence bureaucracy tried to foment a national security panic over Russian nukes in space in hopes of ramming through the Ukraine aid package and killing reforms designed to curb its power to spy on Americans.

Lest you think that sounds crazy, consider the timing of the panic provocations, which came almost immediately after House Speaker Mike Johnson said he and other Republicans weren’t going to be “rushed” into approving the $61 billion aid package for Ukraine. It also came at the precise moment — just coincidentally! — that the House was debating reforms to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, set to expire in April, that would end warrantless surveillance of Americans, which of course the White House and intelligence agencies oppose.

All of it just goes to show that the most serious threat facing America isn’t Russian nukes in space or overseas terrorist plots, it’s the political class in Washington and our intelligence agencies that think they’re above the law.

Here’s what happened. On Wednesday, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner issued a cryptic warning about a “national security threat” related to a “destabilizing foreign military capability” so grave that President Biden should declassify all information about it immediately. Soon thereafter, anonymous sources leaked to the press that the threat was about Russia wanting to put nuclear weapons in space.

This prompted a flood of statements from Republicans and Democrats that the threat was very serious — but not to worry, they have the situation under control. White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan told reporters he had already scheduled a briefing with congressional leaders on the matter before Turner made his statement, and don’t worry, President Biden “is going to ensure the security of the American people.” (Read more from “Our Most Serious National Security Threat Isn’t Russian Nukes in Space, It’s Intelligence Agencies in Washington” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Your Government Needs You Angry At Foreign Tyrants So You Won’t Notice The Ones Ruling You

/2 Comments/in , /by

In response to reports that Putin critic Alexei Navalny has died in a Russian prison, your rulers in Washington want you to be angry. Your corrupt government, which is at this very moment working to put your Christian neighbors in prison for protesting abortion, wants you to be very angry at a foreign leader nearly 6,000 miles away so you won’t pay attention to what your leaders are doing to you in your own backyard.

Your government, which wants to disarm you and prevent you from defending yourself, wants you angry at a leader who has no power over you whatsoever. The government that censors you and lies to you about viruses it helped create wants your focus elsewhere. The government that sold your economy off to China and then destroyed the value of your currency wants you mad at someone else.

The government that banned you from going to church and then tried to fire you for not taking its worthless “vaccine” wants to whip you into a frenzy over literally anything else other than what it’s doing to you right now.

The government that opened your borders to invasion and looked the other way as violent crime enveloped your cities wants you to believe that crime on another continent is the only crime you should care about. And that the borders of a country half a world away are the only borders worth protecting. (Read more from “Your Government Needs You Angry At Foreign Tyrants So You Won’t Notice The Ones Ruling You” HERE)

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

💪 Dependence on You:

We’ve weathered storms, but today, we rely entirely on your generosity to keep our platform alive. Your support is not just a donation; it’s a partnership in upholding the values that define us. Together, let’s defy challenges and ensure Restoring Liberty thrives for another two decades.

🌐 How You Can Make a Difference:

Your contribution is a vital lifeline for us. By donating HERE, you become an integral part of our mission. Every dollar is an investment in preserving a powerful conservative voice that resonates across the nation.

🙏 Join Us in Shaping the Future:

Help us overcome the financial hurdles that come with independence. Your donation paves the way for continued growth, impact, and influence. Together, let’s empower Restoring Liberty to shape the future of conservative values.

🔗 Donate HERE and be a Guardian of Liberty!

Thank you for being the backbone of Restoring Liberty. With your support, we’ll stand strong for another two decades and beyond!