Former President Barack Obama took the unusual step of making an endosement in a foreign election Wednesday, giving his unqualified support to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — but he still hasn’t endorsed his former Vice President, Joe Biden, for the 2020 Democratic nomination. . .
“I was proud to work with Justin Trudeau as President. He’s a hard-working, effective leader who takes on big issues like climate change. The world needs his progressive leadership now, and I hope our neighbors to the north support him for another term,” Obama wrote.
I was proud to work with Justin Trudeau as President. He's a hard-working, effective leader who takes on big issues like climate change. The world needs his progressive leadership now, and I hope our neighbors to the north support him for another term.
The Canadian election is next Monday and so far, Trudeau’s Liberal Party, which holds a majority in Parliament now, is neck and neck with the Conservatives. If the Liberal Party doesn’t pull out a victory, Trudeau will lose his status as Prime Minister.
Canadian state television is predicting that neither party will win a majority and that whomever serves as Prime Minister will preside over a coalition government — something Justin Trudeau doesn’t necessarily want to do. His closest allies in the election are the New Democrats Party and the Green Party and both have taken shots at Trudeau in recent weeks as the election draws to a close. (Read more from “Obama Won’t Endorse Biden, but He’ll Endorse ‘Racist’ Trudeau” HERE)
House Republicans are moving forward with efforts to censure House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., they announced at a news conference Wednesday morning.
“Today, we’re going to be pressing forward with my motion to censure Mr. Schiff, joined by the vast majority of Republicans in this conference,” House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., told reporters at the conference, at which he was joined by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., and House Republican Conference Chair Liz Cheney, Wyo. Biggs also said that the resolution had thus far been joined by almost 150 members of Congress, “with more coming up today to sign on.”
In a tweet ahead of the news conference, Biggs said that he would call for a vote on the censure later the same day.
During his remarks, Biggs accused Schiff of having the “temerity to absolutely fabricate” a version of the conversation between President Trump and the president of Ukraine over the phone in late July. “He could have read the transcripts,” Biggs added. “Instead he made, whole cloth, a fabrication of something that just absolutely was untrue.”
Biggs introduced the measure to censure Schiff last month, following the top Democrat’s fictionalized retelling of the Trump-Ukraine phone call at a hearing of the House Intelligence Committee. At the same hearing, Schiff defended his version of events as “parody.”
The measure says that Schiff’s actions “misled the American people, bring disrepute upon the House of Representatives, and make a mockery of the impeachment process” and resolves that the House “censures and condemns” the Democratic chairman.
Since he introduced the measure to censure Schiff, Biggs added, the intelligence committee chairman “has taken this to a Soviet-style inquiry. That is to say, everything is behind closed doors; there’s absolutely no transparency.”
The Freedom Caucus chairman also took issue with the overall construction of the House’s impeachment proceedings, echoing the White House’s criticisms that Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., announced the probe without holding a floor vote or affording minority party members and the executive branch procedures that were present for previous impeachment efforts.
“The speaker has taken it upon herself to run an impeachment investigation outside the norm, in violation of the House rules,” Biggs said. “There’s nothing specifically in the rules, except for this: Where there’s nothing specific, our rules say precedent takes place. So she’s outside the rules because she’s outside the precedent.” (For more from the author of “Republican Leaders Preparing to Censure Adam Schiff over Fictionalized Account of Trump-Ukraine Phone Call” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/Adam_Schiff_-_Caricature_40024595971.jpg10801920Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2019-10-16 18:31:382019-10-16 18:27:11Republican Leaders Preparing to Censure Adam Schiff over Fictionalized Account of Trump-Ukraine Phone Call
Listen carefully when you hear Republican and Democrat liberal politicians speak about criminal justice, and you will notice the term “bail reform.” Those who live in the real world probably think this means ensuring that dangerous criminals are not let out on the streets for years pending the disposition of their trials. However, it means the exact opposite. Sadly, such “reform” is already the norm in places like New York. The latest example you will never hear from the “criminal justice reform” politicians is the case of Tony Johnson of Brooklyn.
According to the New York Post, one of the few outlets covering the outrageous jailbreak cases in the city that once led the nation in reducing crime, Tony Johnson, a reputed member of the Folk Nation gang, was arrested in Brooklyn on 34 criminal charges earlier this year, including armed robbery and assault. The prosecutors asked for $225,000 bail at the March 5 arraignment, but Judge Craig Walker agreed to release him on just $6,000 bail.
After his release, according to court documents, he is accused of robbing a female on September 15, robbing a male and severely beating a female victim the following day in separate incidents, and finally kidnapping and raping a 12-year-old girl on October 8. He was arrested two days later on first-degree sexual assault and two counts of robbery. Even now, his bail is set at $105,000, not terribly high given his record and the current accusations.
The Post quotes a local detective lamenting how the politicians only seem to care about the perpetrators and springing them from jail, not the victims. “Nobody ever talks about the victims. This poor girl’s life has been ruined because they gave this guy another chance he didn’t deserve.”
Sadly, the voices of law enforcement, victims of crime, and law-abiding citizens are never heard any more. Now it’s the criminals who are the protected class. New York has enacted a new law effective this coming January that will essentially abolish bail for juveniles and for crimes that they dubiously label as “low-level,” meaning the accused will be released immediately on their own recognizance.
In addition, the bill will create numerous legal loopholes for defendants to block convictions by asking for more access to evidence and information about witnesses, as well as the right to return to the scene of the crime, which would mean the private home of a woman in the case of a rape that was alleged to have happened in the victim’s residence. Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley fears this new law will be a “total overhaul of our criminal justice system as we know it.”
The New York Post has covered a rash of recent cases where career violent criminals either were let out of prison early, violated parole and were not reincarcerated, or were never locked up to begin with. Rodriguez “Randy” Santos was arrested last week for brutally murdering four homeless men. He had 14 prior arrests, including four very violent charges this year, but was out on the streets. Joshua Henderson was rearrested three times over the past year for violating his parole but was out on the streets to allegedly rape a woman in Queens, forcing on her a horrific choice between engaging in incest or being raped.
The same weekend Santos is accused of killing four homeless men in NYC, two repeat violent felons are accused of shooting up a bar in Kansas City, resulting in four fatalities. It was a mass shooting you won’t hear about in the media. In turns out that both suspects, one of whom is still at large, had lengthy rap sheets and were released with pending charges just a few weeks ago despite violating their parole.
The increase in violent crimes by repeat offenders begins with the hands-off approach toward policing against misdemeanors, the exact opposite of the “broken windows” policing in the Giuliani era that so effectively dropped crime in the nation’s largest city. Jacob Gershman reports in the Wall Street Journal that there has been a 50 percent drop in misdemeanor arrests in New York City since 2010. That is the lowest point since 1990, the days of the Mayor Dinkins crime wave. As U.C. Irvine professor Alexandra Natapoff is quoted as saying, “Misdemeanor enforcement is much less sensitive to actual crime rates and influenced by changing political and cultural winds.” Those winds are all in the direction of jailbreak.
Conservatives need to wake up before it’s too late and realize that the Left has already quietly succeeded in getting Republicans to support a worse form of jailbreak than anything we feared from the Dukakis Democrats. And most people don’t even know it’s happening. (For more from the author of “Jailbreak Epidemic: Gang Member Released on $6k Bail Now Accused of Raping 12-Year-Old Girl” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/jail-1.jpg515900Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2019-10-16 18:21:082019-10-16 18:19:14Jailbreak Epidemic: Gang Member Released on $6k Bail Now Accused of Raping 12-Year-Old Girl
By Townhall. CNN’s Anderson Cooper got right to the point when he had the chance to question former Vice President Joe Biden at Tuesday’s Democratic presidential debate on Ukraine.
“If it’s not okay for a president’s family to be involved in foreign businesses, why was it okay for your son when you were vice president?” Cooper asked Biden.
“Look, my son did nothing wrong,” Biden said. “I did nothing wrong. I carried out the policy of the United States government in rooting out corruption in Ukraine. That’s what we should be focusing on.” . . .
The former VP strayed a bit, before somehow finding a way to invoke the first president of the United States. George Washington, Biden said, worried about foreign interference in our elections. . .
“The president and his thugs have proven they are flat lying,” Biden said, adding we have to focus on “Trump’s corruption.” (Read more from “Dem Debate: Biden Confronted About Ukraine Scandal” HERE)
Sanders promises new jobs for ‘tens of millions of Americans’ during Democratic debate
By Fox News. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., stood by his claim that he would provide jobs for every single American, purportedly ending unemployment in the United States.
His comments came during the fourth Democratic debate on Tuesday when CNN anchor Erin Burnett asked him about his jobs guarantee.
“You say your federal jobs guarantee is part of the answer to the threat of automation, that tens of millions of Americans could end up losing their jobs. Are you promising that you will have a job for every single one of those Americans?” she asked.
“Damn right we will,” Sanders quickly responded. Sanders initially made a jobs guarantee when he released his version of the “Green New Deal” in August. (Read more from “Sanders Promises New Jobs for ‘Tens of Millions of Americans’ During Democratic Debate” HERE)
Andrew Yang Forces Democratic Debate on Universal Basic Income, His Plan to Send Every Adult a $1k Check
By Washington Examiner. Andrew Yang forced a discussion at Tuesday night’s Democratic presidential debate on his proposal for a Universal Basic Income, a plan to send every adult a government check.
Yang, the former entrepreneur running on the platform of implementing a UBI, as it’s known, kicked off a debate about the idea among the candidates when he attacked rival candidate Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’ plan for a federal jobs program. Yang argued it was impractical and not what most voters truly wanted.
“I am for the spirit of a federal jobs guarantee, but you have to look at how it would actually materialize in practice. What are the jobs? Who manages you? What if you don’t like your job?” the former tech executive said, asserting that most Americans don’t want to work for the federal government. “Saying that that is the vision of the economy the 21st-century economy to me is not a vision that most Americans would embrace.”
He added that a federal jobs guarantee “does not take into account the work of people like my wife who is at home with our two boys, one of whom is autistic.”
Yang’s proposal would give $1,000 cash monthly without any conditions, which he dubs a “freedom dividend.” He argues that the payment would be productive than federally supported jobs. “We know this in Ohio: If you rely up on the federal government to target its resources, you end up with failed retraining programs and jobs that no one wants,” he said. (Read more from “Andrew Yang Forces Democratic Debate on Universal Basic Income, His Plan to Send Every Adult a $1K Check” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/1280px-CNN_headquarters_in_New_York_City_IMG_3707-1.jpg9601280Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2019-10-15 20:08:342019-10-19 23:15:08Dem Debate: Biden Confronted About Ukraine Scandal; Sanders Promises Millions of New Jobs; Yang to Legalize Heroin, Give Everyone $1,000 a Month For No Reason (VIDEO)
By The Blaze. One of the stickier moments in Hunter Biden’s exclusive ABC News interview Tuesday occurred when anchor Amy Robach asked the son of presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden about personal things.
“What should people know about Hunter Biden that they don’t know?” she queried.
“Like every single person that I’ve ever known, I have fallen and I’ve gotten up,” Hunter Biden replied. “I’ve done esteemable things and things that have been in my life that I regret. Every single one of those things has brought me exactly to where I am right now, which is probably the best place I’ve ever been in my life. I’ve gone through my own struggles.” . . .
Robach then remarked, “In and out of rehab seven, eight times.”
With that Hunter Biden gave Robach an icy stare and interjected, “Say it nicer to me. ‘Sought treatment for an issue,’ like most people.”
(Read more from “Hunter Biden Glares at Interviewer, Orders Her to ‘Say It Nicer to Me’ After She Brings up Rehab Stays” HERE)
‘Not One Cent’: Hunter Biden Tells ABC News He Received No Money from China — but His Bank Records Tell a Different Story
By The Blaze. . . .”The president has repeatedly said that you received $1.5 billion dollars from China, despite no experience and for no apparent reason,” said Robach, while rolling her eyes dismissively. “Obviously, fact-checkers have said that that is not true. Have you received any money from that business dealing?”
“No,” Hunter asserted. “Not one cent … no one ever paid me $1.5 billion.”
In this clip, Glenn noted Hunter’s intentionally misleading semantics, pointing out that Hunter’s company, which he co-owned with Devon Archer and Christopher Heinz, former Secretary of State John Kerry’s stepson, would actually have received the funds.
Jason questioned how ABC News or Robach could conduct a credible interview without so much as mentioning financial records from Morgan Stanley that show numerous transfers of funds from anonymous LLCs in Ukraine, China, and elsewhere going directly into Hunter Biden’s account. . .
“We have the Morgan Stanley file,” Glenn added. “We know offshore China was paying [Hunter] and putting it directly into his Morgan Stanley account.” (Read more from “‘Not One Cent’: Hunter Biden Tells ABC News He Received No Money from China — but His Bank Records Tell a Different Story” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/1022px-American_Broadcasting_Company_Logo.svg_.png10221022Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2019-10-15 20:07:162019-10-15 20:08:08Hunter Biden Glares at Interviewer, Orders Her to ‘Say It Nicer to Me’ After She Brings Up Rehab; Claims He Received No Money from China — but His Bank Records Tell a Different Story
During the October 15, Democrat debate Robert “Beto” O’Rourke made clear that AR-15 owners who refuse to hand over their guns will have them taken away.
O’Rourke reiterated his plan to use a government-mandated buyback to confiscate privately-owned AR-15s and AK-47s. In so doing, he claimed that each AR-15 and AK-47 in private hands is a “potential instrument of terror.” . . .
O’Rourke responded by explaining that he expects complains with the mandatory buybacks. He said, “I expect my fellow Americans to follow the law. The same way we enforce any provision, any law that we have right now, we don’t go door to door to do anything to enforce the law. I expect Republicans, Democrats, gun owners, non-gun owners alike, to follow the law.” . . .
O’Rourke said, “If someone does not turn an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war, or brings it out in public and brandishes it, in an attempt to intimidate…then that weapon will be taken from them. If they persist, there will be other consequences from law enforcement.” (Read more from “Beto: Hand over Guns or There Will Be ’Consequences’” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/1280px-Beto_ORourke_in_Cleveland_40456935723.jpg8531280Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2019-10-15 20:05:112019-10-15 20:08:02Beto: Hand over Guns or There Will Be ’Consequences’
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced Tuesday evening that the lower chamber will continue to hold off on taking an actual vote on whether to launch formal impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump. . .
“There’s no requirement that we have a vote, and so at this time we will not be having a vote,” Pelosi told reporters following a meeting with the House Democratic caucus. “We’re not here to call bluffs — we’re here to find the truth, to uphold the Constitution of the United States. This is not a game for us. This is deadly serious.”
Fox News reported that one congressional aide privy to the closed-door discussions claimed Democrats do not want to appear to be bending to the Trump administration’s demands, after the White House informed the House last week that it would not cooperate with Democrats’ ongoing probe because — among other things — the lower chamber had not held a floor vote on whether to authorize the proceedings.
In an 8-page letter to Pelosi and other top Democrats, Counsel to the President Pat Cipollone wrote, “In the history of our nation, the House of Representatives has never attempted to launch an impeachment inquiry against the president without a majority of the House taking political accountability for that decision by voting to authorize such a dramatic constitutional step.” . . .
In a speech from the Senate floor, McConnell said, “House Democrats are finally indulging in their three-year-old impeachment obsession, full steam ahead.” The majority leader went on to remind his colleagues that some Democrats had declared their plans to impeach President Trump before he was even inaugurated. (Read more from “Nancy Pelosi: House Won’t Vote on Impeachment Inquiry” HERE)
Elizabeth Warren got her first taste of front-runner status at the fourth Democratic primary debate — and the heat that goes along with it.
Her 11 rivals in Westerville, Ohio, on Tuesday night blasted the Massachusetts senator on her approaches to healthcare, taxes, and foreign policy, among a slew of other issues. The negative light they sought to shine on Warren, 70, reflects her steady rise in the polls over the past couple of months to now run even or ahead of former Vice President Joe Biden.
Democrats onstage at Otterbein University hit Warren over her “Medicare for all” plan from points across the ideological spectrum. Socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, returning to the campaign trail after a heart attack, called her idea a pale imitation of his own proposal, which would eliminate private health insurance in favor of government coverage. Other candidates questioned how Warren would pay for the broadening of coverage without raising taxes on middle-class Americans.
“I have made clear what my principles are here. Costs will go up for the wealthy and big corporations,” Warren said during the most crowded debate in modern U.S. political history. “I will not sign a bill into law that does not lower costs for middle-class families.” . . .
“A yes or no question that didn’t get a yes or no answer,” Buttigieg said. “Your signature, senator, is to have a plan for everything, except for this.” (Read more from “Target Warren: 2020 Democrats Pile on While Largely Ignoring Biden” HERE)
. . .According to one model that has been historically accurate, President Trump appears to be on his way to to an easy victory.
Moody’s Analytics uses three different economic models to predict the outcome of political races: “how consumers feel about their own financial situation, the gains the stock market has achieved during Trump’s tenure, and the prospects for unemployment,” CNBC reports. “The modeling has been highly accurate going back to the 1980 election, missing only once.”
“If the economy a year from now is the same as it is today, or roughly so, then the power of incumbency is strong and Trump’s election odds are very good, particularly if Democrats aren’t enthusiastic and don’t get out to vote,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. “It’s about turnout.” . . .
“Our ‘pocket¬book’ model is the most economically driven of the three. If voters were to vote primarily on the basis of their pocketbooks, the president would steamroll the competition,” the report says. “This shows the importance that prevailing economic sentiment at the household level could hold in the next election.”
Under the stock market model, Trump would win with a 289-249 vote. The unemployment model gives Trump a 332-206 win. Using all three models combined, Trump wins 324-214. (Read more from “Trump on Way to Easy Win in 2020, According to Historically Accurate Election Model” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/46451130962_d151b497d6_b-4.jpg6831024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2019-10-15 19:38:032019-10-15 19:36:08Trump on Way to Easy Win in 2020, According to Historically Accurate Election Model
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo might want to avoid his little brother after using an uncensored version of the N-word during a live radio show on Tuesday.
CNN pundit Chris Cuomo, the younger brother of the Democratic governor, famously said being called “Fredo” is “like the N-word” for Italians during a viral outburst earlier this year. Fredo is a reference to Fredo Corleone, the weak and facile brother in the movie “The Godfather,” who was played by John Cazale.
The older Cuomo sibling called into WAMC radio to discuss a variety of topics, including a recent New York Times opinion piece headlined, “How Italians Became ‘White.” The governor used the uncensored version of the N-word when discussing the Times piece.
“They used an expression that Southern Italians were called, I believe they were saying Southern Italians, Sicilians – I’m half Sicilian – were called, quote-unquote and pardon my language, but I’m just quoting the Times: ‘n—r wops,’” Cuomo said without censoring the word. . .
WAMC’s Alan Chartock didn’t comment on Cuomo’s use of the word. In fairness to the governor, the Times did publish the uncensored word itself to describe racist terms used against Italian-Americans — but that didn’t stop critics from rushing to Twitter with thoughts.
He said it in the context of trying to yell at the New York Times for being unfair to him, referencing a term they used.
So the motivation behind the using of the word wasn’t even defensible. It was just self serving, which is par for the course with Andrew Cuomo. https://t.co/h04g0G2NfQ
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/24147218442_41f2e566f5_b-2.jpg8001024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2019-10-15 19:34:172019-10-15 19:32:39New York Governor Uses N-Word During Live Interview