Roy Moore: Two U.S. Supreme Court Justices Should Abstain from Gay Marriage Vote

Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore says two U.S. Supreme Court Justices should recuse themselves from an upcoming vote on gay marriage because they have performed the marriages of same-sex couples.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan have both performed same-sex marriages, which indicates how they may vote on the issues of gay marriage, Moore said in an interview with AL.com on Thursday. “Their actions speak louder than their words,” he said.

The U.S. Supreme Court in April is set to hear an appeal from U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals decisions upholding bans on same-sex marriage in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky and Tennessee. The ruling is set to be issued in June and and settle the issue in other states, including Alabama.

Moore has been an outspoken supporter of Alabama’s laws banning same-sex marriage and the definition of marriage as being between a man and a woman. (Read more from “Roy Moore: Two U.S. Supreme Court Justices Should Abstain from Gay Marriage Vote” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

  • All SEVEN Supreme Court justices should recuse themselves!

    This is not an issue to be decided by the “Supreme” Court, or any lower court. It’s already been decided by the exclusive Lawgiver and Judge (Isaiah 33:22) in Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13.

    That this issue (and other similar moral issues) are eventually in the hands of a five to four majority of bibically adverse and unqualified judges to decide for 320 million people is but more evidence of the biblical sedition of the U.S. Constitution. For example:

    “…The Bible stipulates, among other things, that judicial appointees must be men of truth who fear Yahweh and hate covetousness. (See Chapter 5 “Article 2: Executive Usurpation” for a list of additional Biblical qualifications.) The United States Constitution requires no Biblical qualifications whatsoever. Nowhere does the Constitution stipulate that judges must rule on behalf of Yahweh, rendering decisions based upon His commandments, statutes, and judgments as required in Exodus 18. That not even one constitutional framer contended for Yahweh,3 as did King Jehoshaphat, speaks volumes about the framers’ disregard for Him and His judicial system:

    ‘And he [King Jehoshaphat] set judges in the land throughout all the fenced cities of Judah, city by city, and said to the judges, Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for YHWH,4 who is with you in the judgment…. And he charged them, saying, Thus shall ye do in the fear of YHWH, faithfully, and with a perfect heart., (2 Chronicles 19:5-9)….”

    For more, see online Chapter 6 “Article 3: Judicial Usurpation” of “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective.” Click on my name, then our website. Go to our Online Books page, click on the top entry, and scroll down to Chapter 6.

    Then find out how much you REALLY know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our Constitution Survey in the right-hand sidebar and receive a complimentary copy of a book that EXAMINES the Constitution by the Bible.

    • Gregory Alan of Johnson

      There are nine “justices” on that “court”.

      • Thanks! Yes, of course. Don’t know what I was thinking. Wasn’t thinking!!!

    • lettermullen

      I guess you missed the part where the bible is not law in this nation. You also missed the part in the constitution that prohibits any religious test for holding office or the First Amendment that bars government from establishing religion. Are you sure you are an American? Does not seem you know much about your country and its governance if you are.

      • Thanks for helping me make my point.

        • lettermullen

          So, your point was to demonstrate how little you know about the Constitution and our government? Glad to help.

        • lettermullen

          Guess I should have visited your website. The constitution was designed to protect this nation and its people from mentally deranged folks like you.

          • “For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent. Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?” (1 Corinthians 1:18-20)

          • lettermullen

            “Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person’s life, freedom of religion affects every individual. Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights. Moreover, state support of an established religion tends to make the clergy unresponsive to their own people, and leads to corruption within religion itself. Erecting the “wall of separation between church and state,” therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society.
            We have solved, by fair experiment, the great and interesting question whether freedom of religion is compatible with order in government and obedience to the laws. And we have experienced the quiet as well as the comfort which results from leaving every one to profess freely and openly those principles of religion which are the inductions of his own reason and the serious convictions of his own inquiries.” Thomas Jefferson. His views matter; those of the long dead Jewish man who wrote what you quoted? Not relevant.

          • lettermullen

            Every phrase and cirsumstance are marked with the barbarous hand of superstitious torture, and forced into meanings it was impossible they could have. The head of every chapter, and the top of every page, are blazoned with the names of Christ and the Church, that the unwary reader might suck in the error before he began to read.[Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason, p.131]

          • lettermullen

            “All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.” Thomas Paine

  • c69101

    Thumbs Up for State Supreme Court Judge Moore!

  • akprayingmom

    Great wisdom and insight from Judge Roy Moore. I wish Judge Roy Moore was on the Supreme Court. Sadly, it is doubtful that Ginsburg and Kagen (especially Kagen) will recuse themselves because they do not have the moral character or integrity of Judge Roy Moore. Several of the Supreme Court are not commited to uphold the spirit or even the letter of Constitutional law and instead are bent on forcing a radical leftist communist agenda on the from of congressional sympathizers and Obama.

    • SteveMacko

      Kagan should have recused herself from the 0bamacare case, since she worked very closely with 0bama to get it passed. But she didn’t.

      • Bob2002

        Being a Democrat, this is typical. No moral fiber in Democrats. Sotomayor should also recuse herself, but being a Democrat, she will not.

    • lettermullen

      My dog has more moral character and integrity that the Chief Justice of Alabama. Understands the Constitution better as well.

  • Gregory Alan of Johnson

    Since a “Marriage Certificate” is a commercial contract between three parties, which is designed to “benefit” the STATE OF, all municipal corporations should be banned from participating in issuing these and other “Certificates”, as they are ONLY issued for monetary gain, both private and public.

  • Linda

    I Love You Roy Moore ! Thank You for standing up for Godly principles !