COMMENTARY

There is simply no other way to say it.

If the U.S. Supreme Court rules that states must recognize so-called same-sex “marriage” does that mean that proponents of real marriage have only the remedy of a Constitutional Amendment to block the effects of such a decision? Nope. There’s a much more direct path.

“Same-sex marriage” may be an affront to common sense, an oxymoron, and even an ontological impossibility. But as the product of a type of behavior familiar in contemporary politics, its promotion is nothing really new.

Prepare for civil disobedience. That’s the message one prominent pastor is sending to some 16 million members of the Southern Baptist Convention.

The sixth in our series on Building the Resistance to Same Sex Marriage is written by a former congressman who asserts that there is a “duty to disregard any federal judicial usurpation of the states’ lawful jurisdiction of marriage policy.” In other words, time for some civil disobedience.

In our fifth in the series on Building the Resistance to Same Sex Marriage: I was a law student when I initially learned of some of the consequences of not being politically correct concerning homosexuality. But there is a much, much broader impact.

Dozens of books have been written in recent years by liberal theologians in an attempt to demonstrate that homosexuality, homosexual relationships, and homosexual marriage are fully consistent with Biblical Christianity. Not only are these authors patently wrong, the move to reconcile Christianity with homosexuality is more evidence we have entered the Biblically-foretold age of apostasy.