Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Effectively Delayed Another Month

Photo Credit: Brian Snyder, Reuters

Photo Credit: Brian Snyder, Reuters

In a classic Friday news dump, the Department for Health and Human Services has just effectively delayed the individual mandate in President Obama’s health care law for another month, until May 1.

This shift is the latest in a dizzying set of changes that have been made to the enforcement of a policy that the administration defended all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Starting in 2014, individuals who did not purchase government approved insurance were supposed to be subject to a penalty of $95 or 1 percent of taxable income. Under the original sequence of events, individuals would have had until Feb. 15 to purchase insurance without being fined. Last October, HHS created a “hardship exemption” that pushed the deadline to March 31 to coincide with the end of the open enrollment period for individuals seeking insurance through the federal exchange.

Read more from this story HERE.

Apple, Facebook, Others Defy Authorities, Notify Users of Secret Data Demands

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Major U.S. technology companies have largely ended the practice of quietly complying with investigators’ demands for e-mail records and other online data, saying that users have a right to know in advance when their information is targeted for government seizure.

This increasingly defiant industry stand is giving some of the tens of thousands of Americans whose Internet data gets swept into criminal investigations each year the opportunity to fight in court to prevent disclosures. Prosecutors, however, warn that tech companies may undermine cases by tipping off criminals, giving them time to destroy vital electronic evidence before it can be gathered.

Fueling the shift is the industry’s eagerness to distance itself from the government after last year’s disclosures about National Security Agency surveillance of online services. Apple, Microsoft, Facebook and Google all are updating their policies to expand routine notification of users about government data seizures, unless specifically gagged by a judge or other legal authority, officials at all four companies said. Yahoo announced similar changes in July.

As this position becomes uniform across the industry, U.S. tech companies will ignore the instructions stamped on the fronts of subpoenas urging them not to alert subjects about data requests, industry lawyers say. Companies that already routinely notify users have found that investigators often drop data demands to avoid having suspects learn of inquiries.

“It serves to chill the unbridled, cost-free collection of data,” said Albert Gidari Jr., a partner at Perkins Coie who represents several technology companies. “And I think that’s a good thing.”

Read more from this story HERE.

‘The Point Is We Should Have Tried’—Brigadier General on Failure to Rescue Americans in Benghazi

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Dominos are falling in the Benghazi cover-up. Today, explosive and emotional testimony from Brig. Gen. Robert Lovell (Ret.), former Intelligence Director of U.S. Africa Command, rocked the House Government Oversight Committee. Lowell held his post at the time of the Benghazi attack, which fell into his area of command. From the U.S. base in Stuttgart, Germany, Lovell watched the message traffic relating to Benghazi, in real time, as the attack was unfolding.

As Lovell stated, it is “my duty” to come forward to give the American people a “full forthcoming” about what happened. The discussion in the post-Benghazi investigations has focused on issues such as time, distance and assets that could have been used to rescue the Americans under attack. However, said Lovell, his voice filling with emotion,

The point is we should have tried. The military is trained to go in the direction of gunfire.

In Benghazi they did not, and the question remains why.

Pressed by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R–Calif.) about the mood in the Stuttgart command on that fateful night, Lovell admitted, “There was desperation” about how to save the individuals in Benghazi. “Why didn’t we do anything?” Lovell said with tears in his eyes, “There were a lot of deference to the desires of the State Department what they wanted us to do.”

As brought out by Rep. Jim Jordan (R–Ohio), for the first time in Lovell’s entire military career, he could not “run to the sound of the guns. “It is not what State did, but what they didn’t do, come forward to a stronger request for assistance,” said Lovell.

In Libya, State was in the lead. Lovell revealed that his primary contact at State had been Andrew Shapiro, assistant secretary for military and political affairs and a close associate of Hillary Clinton. Shapiro is now, like other Clinton associates, a consultant at Beacon Global Strategies.

Rep. John Mica (R–Fla.) asked Lovell if we might have made military moves that could at least have saved the two Navy Seals, Tyrone Woods and Glen Dougherty, who died around 5 a.m., when the attack resumed at the CIA Annex in Benghazi. Lovell said, “The military could have made a response of some sort.”

Strongly contradicting the narrative promoted by the White House (which, as we now know, originated with deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes) as to the nature of the Benghazi attack, Lovell said.

We knew very early on this was a hostile action, not demonstration gone terribly awry.

He confirmed that he dismissed very early on the idea that this was a demonstration based on a video. “It was not an escalation, it was an attack.”

It is encouraging that Americans are finally hearing first-hand accounts about what happened—and what could have been avoided—that night in Benghazi. But there is so much more yet to be uncovered. It is high time to create a congressional select committee to finally hold the Obama administration accountable.

This article appeared originally at Heritage.com and is re-published in full with the Heritage Foundation’s permission.

Miller: Republican Establishment Must Make Peace with Conservatives

Launch - Joe Walking to Front with KathleenIn a misguided article published in Politico Magazine last week, Forrest A. Nabors argued that I am poised to play the role of spoiler and deliver Alaska’s U.S. Senate seat to the Democrats this fall by running as an Independent. And predictably, the grand conspiracy is all Sarah Palin’s fault.

The suggestion that I intend to run as an Independent in the general election is no more than a rumor spread by the Weekly Standard’s report on a February Hays poll. In that poll, I was included as an Independent only because at least 10 percent of respondents said they would vote for me if their choice were between an establishment Republican and the Democratic incumbent, Sen. Mark Begich. To be perfectly clear: I have never said I am running for anything other than the Republican nomination.

While it is true that Gov. Palin played a decisive role in my stunning 2010 primary victory over the sitting vice chair of the Senate Republican Conference, her responsibility ends there. The truth is, but for the perfidy of the Republican establishment, the conservative movement in Alaska would have prevailed in 2010. And undoubtedly, the Alaska race in 2014 would be a unified Republican effort.

Sadly, Sen. Lisa Murkowski learned the wrong lessons from 2010. She was the only Senate “Republican” to vote for every piece of President Obama’s 2010 lame duck agenda. In the process, she helped the president up off the mat after a crushing defeat in the 2010 mid-term elections and handed him bipartisan legitimacy for his 2012 election. If that didn’t vindicate my 2010 primary challenge of Murkowski, and Palin’s decision to endorse my candidacy, I don’t know what would.

But that is the past. It’s time for people of good will to end the petty intramural conflicts and focus on the task at hand. Unlike many of my establishment Republican friends, I am not driven by hatred of Democrats. Nor am I motivated by the desire for power. I simply love my country and want to see it prosper.

For me, the 2014 election is about the renewal of America and Alaska’s economic future. It is a test of our resolve as a people. Will we stand up for the Constitution and our way of life? Or will we stand down as the world’s greatest civilization fades into the fog of history? I believe that our children and grandchildren deserve to face the future with the same sense of hope and optimism that we once did, and it is our responsibility to make that a reality. I believe that nothing is inevitable, that the future lies within the realm of our free will, that God still governs in the affairs of men who will exercise virtue and that, as Ronald Reagan once reminded us, “The future doesn’t belong to the faint-hearted; it belongs to the brave.”

That’s why I’ve embraced a bold agenda: return to Constitutional government. As Republicans, we must not abandon the sanctity of human life, as some would have us do. We cannot give up on our nation’s greatest asset, the traditional family. We must defend our religious liberties at all cost, and refuse the false promise of security in exchange for our 2nd Amendment rights. It is imperative that we repeal Obamacare. Half-measures and temporary fixes will not do. There is only one way to ensure freedom, access and affordability: Get government out of the way and let the free market work.

Republicans must also contend for the rule of law, and never reward lawlessness. Amnesty is a non-starter, and our borders must be secured. It is a grave matter of national security. Further, we must abolish the IRS and reform the tax code to make it fair and simple; audit the Federal Reserve; cut, cap and balance the federal budget; and return power to the states.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, our internal polling analysis shows that we are in a strong position to win both the primary and general elections in Alaska. Even public polling has seen my candidacy surge in a head-to-head match-up against Begich by 17 points since early last year.

The resurgent reform movement in Alaska is poised to make a big comeback, and without a doubt folks are more energized than they were four years ago. The number of registered Republicans is up 4.3 percent since 2008, while the number of registered Democrats is down 10.4 percent. In that year, Begich squeezed out a narrow victory with 48 percent of the vote against the GOP incumbent, Sen. Ted Stevens, who had just been convicted of multiple felonies. (Stevens’s convictions were later vacated because of prosecutorial misconduct.) This time around, Begich’s job approval in public polling has been hovering around 40 percent for months.

This is shaping up to be another wave election. It is inconceivable that an incumbent senator with job approval numbers so low heading into the election will be able to ride this wave of public discontent to 50 percent plus one, unless establishment Republicans sabotage another election.

Wherever I go across the state, there is seldom a kind word for the Republican Party. Much like the last two presidential elections, nothing could be more catastrophic to the cause of liberty, or to a Republican majority in the Senate, than to nominate another “me too” Republican.

Both of my opponents are now calling for unity, despite the fact that they refused to back the party nominee in the state’s last Senate election. The truth is, someone who helped tear the party apart simply isn’t qualified to lead a unity movement.

It’s time for the Republican establishment to end the impurity tests. A big-tent Republican majority must include full-orbed conservatives who embrace the party platform. If the Republican Party leadership is serious about governing, it has a choice to make: join the reform movement, or embrace a permanent minority status.

Internal Memos Reveal EPA Worked Behind the Scenes to Kill Alaska Mine Project

Photo Credit: Fox News

Photo Credit: Fox News


The Environmental Protection Agency came under fire Thursday after new emails surfaced that allegedly show government officials worked in secret with tribal leaders and other environmental groups to preemptively oppose the controversial Pebble Mine project in Alaska before a review was even conducted.

The internal memos published by The Washington Times show EPA officials working behind the scenes as early as 2008 to kill the gold and copper mine project — two years before any scientific study or survey was conducted looking into the environmental impact.

“As you know I feel that both of these projects (Chuitna and Pebble) merit consideration of a 404C veto,” EPA official Phillip North wrote, according to the emails.

North, according to the Times, pushed to have the mine’s veto added to the agenda of a 2009 agency retreat.

But the EPA announced in 2011there would be a neutral and scientific review of the mining project. At the time, they said that concerns raised by environmental groups and local tribes would be investigated, but that no decision had been made.

Read more from this story HERE.

Merciless: Berkeley Students Forced To Pay for Grad Ceremony – Then See Pelosi as Keynote Speaker

4443559781_909d9decf6College students struggling to pay their bills will have to choose whether or not to attend UC Berkeley’s graduation ceremony because of a high-profile keynote speaker. The ceremony costs $10.00 per head, since students will be graced by the presence of Nancy Pelosi aka Ms. Passthebilltoseewhatsinit.
Campus Reform’s Katherine Timpf reported:

”Students who do not purchase the $10 tickets by Wednesday will not be able to attend, their own commencement, according to the school’s website.” …

“After this story’s initial publication, Rep. Pelosi’s office told Campus Reform that she is not being compensated for speaking.”

Read more from this story HERE.

The Heavy Hand of the IRS Seizes Innocent Americans’ Assets

Photo Credit: AP

Photo Credit: AP

Earnest moralists lament Americans’ distrust of government. What really is regrettable is that government does much to earn distrust, as Terry Dehko, 70, and his daughter Sandy Thomas, 41, understand.

Terry, who came to Michigan from Iraq in 1970, soon did what immigrants often do: He went into business, buying Schott’s Supermarket in Fraser, Mich., where he still works six days a week. The Internal Revenue Service, a tentacle of a government that spent $3.5 trillion in 2013, tried to steal more than $35,000 from Terry and Sandy that year.

Sandy, a mother of four, has a master’s degree in urban planning but has worked in the store off and on since she was 12. She remembers, “They just walked into the store” and announced that they had emptied the store’s bank account. The IRS agents believed, or pretended to believe, that Terry and Sandy were or conceivably could be — which is sufficient for the IRS — conducting a criminal enterprise when not selling groceries.

What pattern of behavior supposedly aroused the suspicions of a federal government that is ignorant of how small businesses function? Terry and Sandy regularly make deposits of less than $10,000 in the bank across the street. Federal law, aimed primarily at money laundering by drug dealers, requires banks to report cash deposits of more than $10,000. It also makes it illegal to “structure” deposits to evade such reporting.

Because 35 percent of Schott’s Supermarket’s receipts are in cash, Terry and Sandy make frequent trips to the bank to avoid tempting actual criminals by having large sums at the store. Besides, their insurance policy covers no cash loss in excess of $10,000.

Read more from this story HERE.

‘Big Fat Lie’: Judicial Watch Strikes Back at Jay Carney’s Claim That Bombshell Emails Were ‘Not About Benghazi’

Photo Credit: AP

Photo Credit: AP

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton struck back Thursday at White House press secretary Jay Carney’s claim that newly released Benghazi emails, being labeled a “smoking gun” by some on the right, were “not about Benghazi.”

“These documents, first of all, weren’t voluntarily disclosed,” Fitton told TheBlaze TV’s Dana Loesch. “We had to go to court to get access to the information. We’ve been sitting around since October of 2012 waiting for it.”

He said purposefully: “We sued for documents about talking points given to [former U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice] related to Benghazi. This document was produced to us in response to our lawsuit.”

Read more from this story HERE.

Memo to GOP: To Win in 2014 We Need an Anti-Cronyism, Anti-Corporate Welfare Agenda

Photo Credit: Fox News

Photo Credit: Fox News

When even Nate Silver, editor-in-chief of ESPN’s FiveThirtyEight blog and ABC News Special Correspondent, thinks Republicans are favorites to win back control of the Senate, you know things are going in the right direction.

The Republican Party – America’s allegedly conservative party – has momentum on its side. Conservatives in 2013 kept focus on President Obama’s unfair, unworkable and unaffordable health care law while liberals tried to stifle debate, and the result has been a favorable electoral landscape few predicted a year ago.

But six months out from the November midterm elections, there is plenty of time for the forces of the status quo to arrest this conservative momentum.

The lessons of the 2012 election cycle are plain in the history books for all to see. When Republicans keep their heads down, worry about “not making ourselves the issue,” and stick to safe, silent stump speeches, the vociferous left has everything it needs to reframe the debate on the terms upon which it prospers.

To avoid this outcome, conservatives must stay on offense and keep our agenda before the American people. That means continuing to make the case that ObamaCare must be replaced with an alternative that lowers cost and increases choice in health care.

Read more from this story HERE.

Feds Consider Taking Alaska Tribal Land into Trust

Photo Credit: Paxson Woelber / flickr

Photo Credit: Paxson Woelber / flickr

The U.S. Department of Interior announced this week that it will consider taking Alaska tribal land into trust.

The move could lead to pockets of “Indian country,” where tribal courts and governments would have authority to create their own laws and justice systems, the Anchorage Daily News reported (https://is.gd/bUHu9y).

Currently, the only Indian country community with a reservation in the state is Metlakatla, in southeast Alaska.

The state opposes the move.

A judge in Washington, D.C., last year agreed with Alaska Native tribes, supported by nonprofit law firms, which sued in federal court saying the Interior Department should have been taking land into trust years ago.

Read more from this story HERE.