Muslim Inbreeding Has Corrupted Islam’s Psyche and the Results Are Alarming

Ride Side News had the the privilege of holding an e-mail correspondence interview with Nicolai Sennels, a Danish psychologist who has worked in his government’s in-prison psychology programs to determine why so many juveniles from the Muslim immigrant community populate the Danish penal system. In the course of his research he investigated Muslim inbreeding and its effects on “Islam’s psyche”, and he gained tremendous insight into the “mind of Islam” through thousands of face-to-face dialogues with disaffected Muslims. Here are his conclusions.

The Interview

RSN: First Nicolai, would you acquaint the readers with your background, and how you have come by expertise on the Muslim mind.

Nicolai (born 1976): I am a licensed psychologist. My first appearances in the Danish media concerned my somewhat unorthodox therapy methods that I developed as the only psychologist at Sønderbro, a Copenhagen youth prison (see here and here). I taught the young prisoners about mindfulness meditation and developed a special program on anger management. I also developed a psychotherapeutic method that focused on teaching criminals with a low understanding of emotions and empathy how to take responsibility for their own behavior. In 2008, the prisoners of Sønderbro voted the facility as the best prison in Denmark. The leader of Social Services in the Copenhagen municipality concluded that this was due to my work.

At a conference on immigrant crime in 2008, arranged by the Copenhagen municipality, I said that one should not use the term “criminal immigrants,” but “criminal Muslims,” since the majority of criminal immigrants have Muslim background. Seven out of ten inmates in the Danish youth prisons have immigrant backgrounds, and almost all of them are Muslims. I was threatened that if I were to discuss my experiences again, I would get fired my job. This story developed into a national debate on the freedom of speech and became a widely discussed topic in the Danish media, and the even Minister of Integration joined the discussion.

I decided to publish a book on my experiences, “Among Criminal Muslims. A Psychologist’s Experiences from the Copenhagen Municipality”, which was well received in both the official Psychologists Union’s magazine and the newspapers. I found myself a new job at the Danish Ministry of Defense, and now once again I now work as a psychologist with children and teenagers.

I consulted on the case against Omar Khadr, a convicted terrorist serving in Guantanamo. I also contributed a chapter to the Dutch book Islam: Critical Essays on a Political Religion, along with Raymond Ibrahim, Hans Jansen, Michael Mannheimer, Ibn Warraq, Bat Ye’or and other renowned critics of Islam and Muslim immigration. Besides this I wrote a long list of articles on the psychology of Islam, Islam’s view on women, on Muslim culture and the wide spread inbreeding in Muslim society.

RSN: You have written extensively about inbreeding among Muslims, would you please explain how Islamic culture figures into their criminality.

Nicolai: Inbreeding among Muslims are extremely widespread. Around 70 percent of Pakistanis, 45 percent of Arabs and 25-30 percent of Turks are children of blood-related parents, usually first-cousin marriages. These are staggering numbers and the impacts on intelligence, sanity, health and society among Muslims are enormous. Genetics is of course a very touchy subject, especially after Hitler, but this should not deter us from pointing out a very serious problem that harms millions of children and causes massive problems for the families, who often live in places with no public resources for handicapped people. Taking up the problem of inbreeding in Muslim culture is done out of compassion for the children and the families.

Out of a professional interest as a psychologist I have studied Islam and Muslim culture for more than a decade, and I have counselled hundreds of Muslims. And I would say there are several, religious reasons for this very unhealthy practice. One reason is that Muhammad simply allows it. This is done in the Quran’s sura 4 – which by the way also legalizes sex slaves. Another reason is that consanguinous marriages, as it is called, allows the families to keep their daughters close, and thus be in a better position to observe whether they follow Islamic law, the Sharia. One third reason is that Muhammad himself married one of his cousins, and emulation of Muhammad is a central part of Islamic practice.

RSN: In your opinion, what role do Muslim genetics play in the Muslim’s ability to function in the modern world.

Nicolai: Inbreeding among cousins are connected with long list of risks. Among them are still births, infant death, low intelligence, physical diseases and handicaps and psychiatric problems. There also seem to be a clear connection between the negative effects of inbreeding and terrorism. In some cases, people with low intelligence or other mental handicaps have been easy to lure into becoming suicide bombers. In other cases, martyring oneself consciously can be an honorable way to end a life of pain or low social status due to handicaps, genetic syndromes or psychiatric problems. It is also important to know, that low intelligence and certain psychiatric disorders – which can be the result of inbreeding – is known to increase risk of delinquent behavior.

Thus inbreeding, especially if it happens through several generations, increases the risks of handicaps and disorders, that in one way or another can decrease one’s ability to function in a modern world.

The cognitive consequences of Muslim inbreeding thus might explain why non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the Danish army’s intelligence test than native Danes. It probably also explains – at least partly – why two thirds of all immigrant school children with Arabic backgrounds are illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system.

The high expenses on special education for slow learners consumes one third of the budget for the Danish schools. 51 percent of the children on the three schools in Copenhagen for children with physical and mental handicaps have immigrant back ground and on one of the schools the amount is 70 percent. These amounts are significantly higher than the share of immigrant children in the municipality, which is 33 percent. According to one expert, “The many handicapped children are a clear evidence that there are many intermarried parents in the immigrant families.”

RSN: When it comes to immigrating Muslims, it is widely recognized that Muslims have difficulty integrating into Western culture, especially into Europe or “Eurabia,” to what do you attribute this difficulty?

Nicolai: Well, to integrate into a culture you have to fulfill three conditions. You have to want it, you have to be able to and you have to be allowed by your family. The more welfare, the lesser motivation for integration, since you will get food and accommodation, no matter if you learn the language, earn your own money and integrate into the community – or not. And because of low education, and possibly also negative effects of inbreeding, and the many and often insurmountable differences between Western and Muslim culture, many Muslim refugees and migrants are simply not able to. Learning the language, taking an education and functioning effectively on our high tech, knowledge based work market is too difficult for them. Thirdly, many Muslim families do not allow their children to integrate. Western culture, with our freedom of speech, democracy and equality of women is opposing Islam and Muslim culture on so many central areas, that integration would mean apostasy to many Muslims. Some young Muslim and some Muslim women regularly try, but the consequences are often so extreme, that it deters thousands others from trying to break free of the religious restrictions within Islam.

On top of these things comes the mountains of hate speech against non-Muslims and our way of life in the Quran and the hadiths, which makes it very unnatural to befriend and trust non-Muslims. A recent study among Muslims by the German state concluded that 94 percent of Muslims in Germany agreed with the statement that immigrants in Germany should keep the culture of their country of origin.

The result you see today all over the West, where Muslims tend to group in Muslim areas. Many of these areas are today de facto no-go zones. Here secular authorities are regularly threatened and even attacked, while fundamentalist imams, patrolling Muslim father groups and home made sharia courts are safe to rule.

RSN: In your experience, what role do Islamic religious authorities play in the life of Muslim immigrant community? What role does the individual’s practice of the Islamic religion play in the Muslim immigrants’ success or failure in integrating into the host culture?

Nicolai: Well, to answer you first question it is just to look at the statistics. According to the above mentioned study from Germany, 85 of Muslims in Germany declare themselves to be religious or very religious. A cross-European study showed that 75 percent of Muslims in Europe think that the Quran can not be interpreted ambiguously – that it has to be taken literal. Many other studies reach similar conclusions. Muslims are thus much more religious than most other groups, they trust the written word in their religious books more – so of course the religious authorities play an important role in Muslim immigrants’ life.

That is why it is so important to ensure, that mosques in our Western countries actively, publicly and consistently reject the many verses in the Quran and the Hadiths telling Muslims to persecute, harm or even kill non-Muslims. If we do not ensure this, mosques and religious authorities will contribute to the radicalization of Muslims. Unfortunately this has already happened, and now Europe has a deadly serious problem with homegrown jihadis. 80 percent of young Turks in Holland see “nothing wrong” in waging Jihad against non-Muslims. 27 percent of all young French and 14 percent of all young British under 25 sympathize with the genocidal terror organization Islamic State. This includes most probably the vast majority of young Muslims in these two countries. Take a look at those numbers and then try to imagine what that means to Europe’s future. Several of our countries have already deployed the military and the police is running out of resources in their desperate efforts to track and contain the threats.

The interesting thing is that Islam is the only religion in the world, where people become more violent, the more they practice and study their religion. So when it comes to Islam, more religion means more violence.

I think many Americans are not aware of what you are letting into your countries these months. After a few decades with Muslim immigration, more than half of Europeans are against Muslim immigration and the spread of Islam in our countries. I had hoped that the Americans would have learned from our bad example here where I live. But it seems that your president has decided that you should make your own experiences.

Your second question concerning Muslims’ religious practice and integration, you already have the answer if you look at Europe. Islam is opposed to Western, liberal values on so many areas, that you can not really call yourself a real Muslim if you also integrate. You might call yourself a “relaxed” Muslim or a “moderate” Muslim, but you can not both claim that you support Free Speech, democracy and the equality of women and non-Muslims, and at the same time say that you follow the Quran and the example of Muhammad.

RSN: In Western circles, Muslim treatment of women is considered oppressive, do you consider that characterization valid, and what role do women generally play in Islamic culture, recognizing that there are obviously differences from area to area?

Nicolai: Islam is obviously suppressive against women. Just read the Quran and the Hadiths. The question is of course how much Muslims follow the laws of Allah and his prophet. For sure there are variations. Just look at photos of women in Iran before and after the Islamic revolution. It is heart breaking to see how those beautiful, smiling, free women have become veiled and suppressed in today’s Iran. In some Islamic countries, though it is fewer and fewer, at least non-Muslim women can wear a bikini on the beach.

The role of women in Islamic culture is mainly to signal honor. The honor of the family depends on the women’s’ willingness to submit themselves to the suppressive Sharia.

One of the things that is interesting for me as a psychologist is that the religious suppression of Muslim women not only affects the women, but also the men. It simply changes the men’s’ sexuality, when they are taught that women are impure. Many Muslim men thus develop homosexuality or pedophilia.

Research among Pakistani truck drivers, for instance, shows that 95 percent of them “indulge in sex with ‘boy’ helpers.” Although according to most psychological schools, homosexuality is not a disturbance of the person’s natural sexual drive — unless it is caused by cultural factors — the widespread use of bacha bareesh, or “dancing boys” within the Afghan culture, perhaps the world’s most segregated and women-suppressive, is just one sign of a culture that seems to lead to such behavior. A US military report from Afghanistan concludes that “homosexual behavior is unusually common among men in the large ethnic group known as Pashtuns. … Pashtun men commonly have sex with other men, admire other men physically, have sexual relationships with boys and shun women both socially and sexually.” The report also described how male Pashtun interpreters continuously infected each other with gonorrhea. When told by the doctors to be more careful they lied about their homosexual activities and claimed that it happened by mixing different kinds of tea. One US doctor working in Afghanistan had to explain to a local man how to get his wife pregnant: “When it was explained to him what was necessary, he reacted with disgust and asked, ‘How could one feel desire to be with a woman, who God has made unclean, when one could be with a man, who is clean? Surely this must be wrong.’”

RSN: Do you, as a psychologist, consider the Muslim attitudes toward and practices of sexuality to foster healthy mental behavior? What are the effects of Muslim sexual practices in regard to their relations with members of the host society?

Nicolai: On the psychological level, one of the most serious consequences of the Islamic view on women is the extreme lack of romantic love. This is because the healing quality of romantic love can only exist if the partners are equal, where nobody is forced, and where nobody is fearing or dominating the other.

Another psychological consequence of the lack of love and the lack of freedom for the sexes to safely explore each other and be inspired by each other can lead to increased anger and aggression, among other dysfunctional social behavior. One obvious case is the infamous “underwear bomber” Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab who attempted to blow up an airplane in midair at Christmas day in 2009. Abdulmutallab struggled with sexual fantasies that according to his Islamic belief were sinful. In order to mentally combat the sexual fantasies, he tried to fantasize about jihad instead. In the end he decided to blow up the main cause of his frustrations by hiding the explosives in his underwear – his penis.

Islamization of sexuality in our Western countries is already happening. We see this already in the way that non-Muslim men are regularly excluded for public swimming halls, our secular societies are pressured to invest in separate bathing facilities in sports places, public authorities’ advises for women to not wear sexy clothes close to refugee centers etc.

I think in general that our free sexual culture and equality of women here in the West is one of the factors that contribute most the Muslims’ alienation here.

The Islamic view on marriage, which is often not completely voluntarily, shows a wide acceptance of forced sexual intercourse, also called rape. Combined with the Islamic view on non-Muslim women – whom Muslim men are allowed to rape according to the Quran – this has led to an epidemy of rapes all over West Europe. Sweden, Holland and UK is hit hardest. Authorities in England estimates that “up to a million” children may have been victims of primarily Pakistani rape gangs. According to one report, Muslim men are 200 times more prone to rape children than non-Muslim men. Every rape is a catastrophe to not only the victim but also the victims’ family and friends. Life-long traumatization and difficulties in one’s sex-life is also often a result.

RSN: Many Western nations are experiencing a large influx of Muslim immigrants, can such a large inflow of Muslims be productively integrated into Western societies, both from the standpoints of the host society and the individual immigrant?

Nicolai: Only non-Europeans can ask such a question. Here on our continent it is clear to everybody that it is not possible and that the consequences are devastating. Not only economically, but we have to witness how ever growing areas of our beautiful, historical European towns and cities are transformed into areas, where our thousand-year-old culture is disappearing and met with hostility. These areas are often completely sealed to non-Islamic cultures and values, and is now breeding ground for jihad-sympathizers on an industrial scale.

It is becoming more and more common that people are talking about the imminent danger of civil war in our cities. Already now many of us have had to explain our children why there are armed military and police with automatic riffles on the way to kindergarten and school. The worst thing is that such conditions are normal to our kids. They do not even know what we have lost, which will make it very difficult for them to fight to get back the safety, freedoms and culture that nourishes the whole world with European, humanistic values.

RSN: What advice would you offer the Western world regarding their growing Muslim populations?

Nicolai: Well, I am a psychologist, not a politician. I mostly look at the human processes. On the other hand, I have been working with this topic for so many years. I have seen my own continent, my own country and my own neighborhood transforming into something I would consider a dystrophic sci-fi movie, had somebody pictured it for me 20 years ago.

I think we can say for sure now that integrating Muslims in Western society is not possible. Of course a few will always want it, be able to and have their family’s consent, but the vast, vast majority will not. Any society can handle having a few un-integrated individuals. There is enough money to give them money to food and clothing, enough public housing and enough police. But when there are enough of such individuals to establish a counter-culture in a larger defined area, trouble starts. That is where you can talk about a critical mass. And this just takes a few thousand. If you live far away, you may not even notice it. But if you live close by, you will discover that your house loses value, that crime rates increase, that there will be less money for welfare, and that your children feel less safe in school – etc.

I think that Americans can be somehow blind to the risks of inviting tens of thousands of Muslims to your country, because you already have problems with gangs and large ghettos. But you have to understand that Muslim ghettos are different from other ghettos. This is because, and this is what Europe learned at such great costs, that Islam is a political religion. It is not just about inner states of mind, inner beliefs, inner values. Islam is also about how society must be aligned with Islamic law, the Sharia. And more important is that Islam condones any mean in order to create these changes. These means include violent jihad and jihad through abusing the legal system. It also includes so-called taqiyya, which means lying in order to further the cause of Islam, and so called hijrah, which means migration in order to populate non-Islamic land in order to conquer it in the long run, block by block if necessary.

I want you Americans to be aware of this fundamental nature of Islam. It is not like other religions. And I hope that you will take a look at Europe and see what is happening here. Our free, safe societies where people have a basic trust and understanding of each other because we have the same basic values are being suffocated in terror threats and Islamization.

Europe have many things to offer the world. Our art, our egalitarian values, our food. But not the naïve approach to Islam and Muslim immigration, which has already cost so much on so many levels. There is a very interesting documentary called “Muslims in Europe”, which might be good to spread in USA – you can watch it here.

End of Interview

Conclusion

In addition to the excellent documentary on the degradation of Europe caused by Islam recommended immediately above, an RSN article, “Muslim Pedophiles, Feminists And Future Civil War,” provides another disturbing view of Islamic depravity occurring in another European country, Great Britain.

Sennels’ findings and the referenced documentary and article all make it clear that Islam is culturally contaminating Europe and is incapable of peacefully coexisting along side Western civilization within the same physical domain. Muslim inbreeding has corrupted Islam’s psyche, which along with Islam’s doctrine of jihad, make Islam incompatible with civilization founded on European Enlightenment principles. (For more from the author of “Muslim Inbreeding Has Corrupted Islam’s Psyche and the Results Are Alarming” please click HERE)

Watch a recent interview with the author below:

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

ATTACK SCENARIO: How Hillary Clinton’s Lust for Money and Power Led to America’s ‘Digital Pearl Harbor’

It’s hard to overstate the impact on national security of what is commonly known as “The OPM Hack”. The secret files of 22 million individuals who have applied for security clearances — maintained by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) — was ripped off as cleanly as Michael Moore stealing cookies from a Girl Scout.

WHAT WAS THE ‘OPM HACK’?

Every person who applies for a security clearance fills out an electronic application called an EQIP or EPSQ, which are questionnaires of applicants.

Those applying for a Top Secret clearance must answer an extremely detailed questionnaire delving into every aspect of their personal life: marital affairs, drug use, criminal activity, and any other bit of information that foreign intelligence services might use to blackmail or compromise a cleared individual.

All of those files were stolen by Red China.

The OPM hack has been so devastating to clandestine operations, including NOCs (agents operating under non-official cover), that the CIA just pulled its agents from Beijing “for their safety”.

Virtually every current and future military and intelligence operation was put at risk by the OPM hack.

100% CERTAIN THAT HILLARY’S SERVER WAS COMPROMISED BY CHINA

Today the FBI has admitted they are investigating what other cyber security experts had already acknowledged: it is virtually certain that Hillary Clinton’s bathroom email server had been compromised by foreign entities.

“In my opinion there is a 100% chance that all emails sent and received by her, including all the electronic correspondence stored on her server in her Chappaqua residence, were targeted and collected by the Russian equivalent of NSA,” said former CIA case officer Jason Matthews, an expert in Russian intelligence.

A top intelligence official under Barack Obama — Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn — noted that China was one likely attacker.

Kelly asked, “What do you think the odds are that the Chinese, the Russians hacked into that server and her e-mail account?”

“Very high,” Flynn said without hesitation. “Likely.”

“Really?”

“Yep. Likely. They’re very good at it. China, Russia, Iran, potentially the North Koreans. And other countries who may be ‘our allies’ because they can.”

HILLARY AND HER OPERATIVES KNEW HER BATHROOM EMAIL SERVER WAS INSECURE

In the most recent email dump, today we discovered that Clinton consigliere Cheryl Mills warned Hillary that use of her bathroom server was unprecedented and dangerous.

On a June 4, 2011 email chain between Hillary Clinton, her Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills and senior aides Huma Abedin and Jake Sullivan, all of whom used private email accounts, and in Clinton and Abedin’s case, Clinton’s secret server, Mills admits she was “someone who attempted to be hacked,” and warned against telegraphing the use of private email, as it “may encourage others who are out there.”

It is clear that everyone involved with the Clintons knew that they were violating the law and endangering U.S. national security.

NUMBER OF EMAILS DEEMED CLASSIFIED ON HILLARY’S SERVER DOUBLED TODAY

Even with the limited number of emails we’ve seen, the State Department revealed that over 400 messages on Hillary’s personal email server were classified.

Each violation constitutes a felony subject to imprisonment for up to 10 years.

As Democrat operative James Carville admitted earlier this year, Hillary employed a personal email server in order to avoid public scrutiny of her actions, be they her cash-for-favors deals, mishandling of classified data, or other illegal activities.

I BELIEVE THAT HILLARY CLINTON’S BATHROOM SERVER LED TO THE OPM HACK

My contention is that Hillary Clinton’s use of a bathroom server led directly to the OPM hack, which cyber experts have called “a digital Pearl Harbor.”

Here’s how the attack chain worked from the perspective of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

1. PLA operative compromises HRC’s email server.

2. PLA operative sends emails to various government officials using the accounts of HRC, Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills or another senior official. Nothing gets the attention of a government apparatchik like an email from the likes of Hillary.

3. The emails contained a spear-phishing link with instructions to click on the link (e.g., “please check out these travel plans and see if they sync up with your schedule”) that installed malware on the targeted device. Predicted click-through rate: 70%+.

4. Targeted device is infected and then used to launch attacks inside applicable government network. These attacks take the form of reconnoitering on the compromised device (reading documents, emails, network drives, etc.); performing reconnaissance on the government network, and launching additional attacks.

In short, compromising Hillary’s email server was a gold mine for foreign intelligence agencies.

I can assure you we haven’t heard the last of tragic, needless compromises of America’s national security due to Hillary Clinton’s voracious lust for power and money. (For more from the author of “ATTACK SCENARIO: How Hillary Clinton’s Lust for Money and Power Led to America’s ‘Digital Pearl Harbor'” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Dems Accuse GOP Leader McCarthy of Admitting This About the Benghazi Panel

Democrats on Wednesday accused House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of having admitted the Benghazi investigation committee was created to politically damage Hillary Clinton, after he seemed to link her dropping poll numbers to the committee’s work.

McCarthy, considered the front-runner to replace retiring Speaker John Boehner, made the remarks in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity Tuesday night. Describing how he would be different as speaker, McCarthy, R-Calif., said he’d be a “conservative speaker that takes a conservative Congress that puts a strategy to fight and win.”

He added: “And let me give you one example. Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s un-trustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened had we not …”

Democrats suggested his comments undermine claims by the committee’s leader and other Republicans that the panel is only seeking the truth about the deadly 2012 attacks at a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya.

“I appreciate Rep. McCarthy finally coming clean and admitting what we have all known all along: that the Benghazi Select Committee was designed and created as a political attack tool to damage a potential Democratic presidential nominee,” Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., a Benghazi committee member and top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said in a statement. (Read more from “Dems Accuse GOP Leader McCarthy of Admitting This About the Benghazi Panel” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Illegal Alien Accused of These Horrific Crimes in Texas Has NOT Been Deported

One illegal immigrant has been formally charged with capital murder and another is expected to be charged soon in connection with the execution of two men and the burning of the victims’ corpses in Texas. The two jailed illegal immigrants are said to be members of a fearsome gang called the Tri-City Bombers which has been tied to multiple massacres and high profile murders in the past.

This week, investigators with the Hidalgo County Sheriff’s Office arrested 22-year-old Edwin Adrian Salinas for his suspected role in the case. Authorities had initially arrested him on unrelated drug charges, but once in custody, homicide detectives were able to link him to the double murder.

Sheriff’s office spokesman JP Rodriguez told Breitbart Texas that once in custody Salinas admitted to investigators his role in the murder. Salinas also had scar tissue on his body from healed injuries that are consistent with him helping set a car on fire.

On Monday afternoon, Salinas went before a local justice of the peace who formally charged him with two counts of capital murder and set his bond at $2 million.

Also on Monday authorities arrested a second suspect who is expected to be formally charged later this week. (Read more from “Illegal Alien Accused of These Horrific Crimes in Texas Has NOT Been Deported” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Dozens of Clinton Emails in Latest Release Contain This Classified Info

Dozens of emails in the State Department’s latest release of Hillary Clinton emails contain information now deemed classified by the department.

The release includes nearly 3,900 new emails. Of them, more than 200 have a “B1” marking, which means they contain classified information – though some may be duplicates. . .

Almost all of the emails were “confidential,” the lowest level of classification, while three emails were declared “secret,” a mid-tier level for information that could still cause serious damage to national security if made public . . .

Anne-Marie Slaughter, director of State’s Office of Policy Planning, lamented in an email conversation that included Clinton on the antiquated nature of the agency’s IT infrastructure, writing “NO ONE uses a State-issued laptop and even high officials routinely end up using their home email accounts to be able to get their work done quickly and effectively.”

Former State Department chief of staff Cheryl Mills replied, ““[A]s someone who attempted to be hacked (yes I was one), I am not sure we want to telegraph how much folks do or don’t do off state mail b/c it may encourage others who are out there.” (Read more from “Dozens of Clinton Emails in Latest Release Contain This Classified Info” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Here’s the Outcome of ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner’s Fatal Car Crash

Prosecutors declined to charge Caitlyn Jenner on Wednesday in a California car crash that led to the death of another driver, saying there was not enough evidence for a conviction.

Authorities said Jenner was towing an off-road vehicle on a trailer behind a Cadillac Escalade on Feb. 7 when he crashed into two cars, pushing one into oncoming traffic. Driver Kim Howe was killed when her Lexus was hit by a Hummer.

“We believed from the start that a thorough and objective investigation would clear Caitlyn of any criminal wrongdoing,” said Blair Berk, Jenner’s attorney. “We are heartened the district attorney has agreed that even a misdemeanor charge would be inappropriate. A traffic accident, however devastating and heartbreaking when a life is lost, is not necessarily a criminal matter.” (Read more from “Here’s the Outcome of ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner’s Fatal Car Crash” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Paul’s Pandering, and His Attack on Cruz

Does Rand Paul believe the road to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue is paved with endless pandering?

At a time when GOP leaders, led by Mitch McConnell, are engaging in the ultimate betrayal and funding Planned Parenthood and all their butchery, Rand Paul is training his fire on….Ted Cruz! He lashed out at the senator from Texas, predicting that he’s “done for in the Senate.” He seemed particularly perturbed by Cruz calling McConnell a liar, even though the senior senator from Kentucky indeed engaged in one of the most verifiable and public acts of lying earlier this year.

Sadly, the negativity Rand is projecting on Cruz for fighting back against the political enemies of our time is precisely why Paul is “done for” in the presidential race. The voters are looking for someone who has no respect for the current system and those who broke it, not someone who is trying to pander to it. They are looking for not just a pandering vote, but a robust voice. Rand would be wise to watch Cruz’s epic speech this week, which essentially encapsulates all the frustrations all of us have had with the current political system. If Rand has a better way forward, it’s clearly lost on everyone.

It Didn’t Have To Be This Way

Back in the summer of 2009, like many conservatives, I was revved up by the prospect of Rand Paul storming the establishment castle and challenging the hand-picked Senate candidate in Kentucky, Trey Grayson, who was chosen by Mitch McConnell of all people. This was the ultimate act of defiance to the permanent political class, and his candidacy gave the grassroots much needed hope that a new GOP majority would actually be different from its predecessors.

Sure, many of us traditional conservatives understood that there would be an occasional issue where the libertarian-leaning Paul would take a different view, but for the most part everyone in the grassroots anticipated the promise of an intellectually honest fighter.

Indeed, his first year or two in the Senate stood out and met most of our expectations. Rand had no problem mixing it up with the D.C. establishment, helped lead the fight against gun control, and brought back the talking filibuster when he blocked Obama’s CIA nominee over concerns of due process. He also proposed a bold five-year balanced budget guided by constitutional limited government principles.

But then he became transfixed with visions of running for president and occupying the White House and that goal became his true north. It started off innocuously with his desire to expand the party and bring the conservative message to non-traditional Republican voters –Blacks, Hispanics, and youth. This in itself was a laudable goal. But in recent months, this pursuit has become an end-game on to itself and has transformed into ubiquitous pandering and watering down of both his conservative and libertarian message.

Here are just six examples of areas where Rand has dissented in a way that not only violates conservative principles but even core libertarian/constitutional principles (putting Iran and immigration aside):

Judicial Tyranny/Religious Liberty: In March 2014, Paul said “I think that the Republican Party, in order to get bigger, will have to agree to disagree on social issues.” But even from a libertarian standpoint, he has made it clear that pandering to popular perception of public opinion overrides constitutional principles. In June 2013, he praised Justice Kennedy’s DOMA decision for helping government “keep up with public opinion.” Some libertarians might disagree with conservatives on marriage, but all constitutionalists agree that there is no constitutional right, and judicial activism based on public opinion is an anathema to those principles.

While Paul has repeatedly said that marriage should be left to the states, he was stone silent as an unelected federal judge tossed out his state’s marriage law last year, which passed with support of 75% of voters in Kentucky. He has also been largely silent as the debate has moved to the broader sexual identity agenda, which attacks religious liberty and private property rights – again – an anathema to libertarianism.

In April, Rand was one of 10 Republicans to vote for a Leahy amendment discriminating against religious social service groups who disagree with the sexual identity agenda.

Rand was not exactly the libertarian warrior he claimed to be when Kim Davis was jailed for being a Christian and refusing to violate her conscience, which Madison referred to as “the most sacred of all property.”

Global Warming: Earlier this year, Rand joined a group of Democrats and moderate Republicans in supporting an amendment to the Keystone bill expressing the sense of the Senate that human beings contribute significantly to climate change. Here is what Barbara Boxer said on the floor at the time: “I think will be recorded as a breakthrough moment in the climate debate. For the first time we will go on record saying the following: Climate change is real and human activity contributes to climate change. What a breath of fresh air this amendment is, and I urge an “aye” vote very strongly.” Is this another issue Rand views as hip with the younger crowd?

Spending: Rand voted for the massive $141 billion deficit-inducing Medicare doc fix bill. It’s great to propose balance budgets that won’t pass, but conservatives need their members to block new spending that will actually be signed into law. This bill could add as much as $500 billion to the deficit. Is Rand scared of the health care lobby? He has also sponsored a bill along with Barbara Boxer that would use new tax revenue to continue purveying the failed federal highway system. Anyone advocating for limited government would agree that transportation is one of the first functions that should be returned to the states.

Obamacare: After quietly opposing the effort to defund Obamacare and remaining largely silent on the issue (not even mentioning it in his announcement speeches), Paul joined a group of senators blocking Sen. David Vitter from enforcing Obamacare laws on members of Congress.

Endorsing McConnell: Nobody expects a sitting senator to support the ouster of his colleague from the same state in a primary, but did Rand have to pull out all the stops in backing McConnell? Cruz declined to support Cornyn in the primary, even though he faced no serious opposition. We now see the full extent of the destruction from McConnell’s leadership in the Senate.

Racial Preferences: After the Supreme Court invalidated sections of the Voter Rights Act (Shelby County v Holder, 2013) on the premise that federal intervention in state’s voting laws was unnecessary in this day and age, Rand hinted at supporting the restoration of those sections. He told The Hill: “I won’t sit idly by and watch our criminal justice system continue to consume, confine and define our young men. I say we take a stand and fight for justice now. Not only do I support the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, I’m a Republican who wants to restore a federal role for the government in the Voting Rights Act.”

Paul also cosponsored a bill (S. Res. 511) that encourages private institutions to interview at least two minority candidates for managerial positions. This resolution was strongly criticized by conservatives for its overreach into the employment market and the discriminatory outcomes that it would encourage.

Senator Paul likes to tout himself as something new and refreshing. But aside from issues pertaining to privacy and the Fourth Amendment, he has recently demonstrated that political considerations reign supreme. While every politician has to engage in some degree of strategizing and even pandering, Rand’s recent actions represent a disconcerting trend that begs the question: where is Rand headed and how far will he go?

Acquiescence and pandering to the powers at be is what has gotten us into this mess. People are looking for a leader who is willing to tear down the structure that has already dismantled our constitutional Republic. Much to the chagrin of many eager fans, Rand is increasingly proving himself not to be that man. (For more from the author of “Paul’s Pandering, and His Attack on Cruz” please click HERE)

Watch a recent interview with the author below:

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Something Crazy Just Happened at ‘Clock Boy’ Ahmed Mohamed’s School

Students at the former Texas high school of clock maker Ahmed Mohammed were forced to evacuate the campus after someone called in a bomb threat on Wednesday morning.

KDFW-4 reports that the caller contacted MacArthur High School at 9:45 AM from an anonymous number and said that a bomb would go off in 30 minutes.

School officials took the threat seriously and evacuated all the students to a nearby football field.

Irving police came and inspected the school, but found nothing suspicious. The officers gave the “all clear” at 10:45 AM.

Breitbart reports that the police have called the threat a “hoax” and are investigating. The person who made the call could receive up to 6 months in jail and a $10,000 fine.

As reported by Western Journalism, Ahmed’s parents pulled their son from the school after he was suspended for bringing a clock to school that officials first believed to be a bomb. Ahmed was detained and questioned by police, but not charged with any crimes. (Read more from “Something Crazy Just Happened at ‘Clock Boy’ Ahmed Mohamed’s School” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas Has a Nightmare Vision

In November 1974, the late Palestine Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat addressed the entire world from the rostrum of the United Nations General Assembly. Always a master of spectacle, Arafat cut an arresting figure as he strode towards the podium in a tieless black shirt and flowing cream jacket, with a perfectly-coiffed keffiyeh wrapped around his head. A holster without its gun—firearms are forbidden in the General Assembly Hall—was draped by his side pocket, completing the aesthetic effect of a Palestinian Che Guevara.

Arafat, however, wasn’t going to let U.N. protocol ruin the dramatic impact of his speech.

“Today I have come bearing an olive branch and a freedom-fighter’s gun,” he told the U.N. delegates at the end of his speech. “Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat: do not let the olive branch fall from my hand.”

In visual terms at least, the contrast between Arafat in November 1974 and Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas on Sept. 30, 2015, couldn’t have been greater. At the General Assembly rostrum, the portly, drab Abbas delivered a speech so rhetorically labored and dull that I found myself wondering whether he’d had second thoughts about dropping the much-vaunted “bombshell” everyone had been talking about. (In the end, he delivered on that one.)

In between thanking Norway, Sweden, the Arab League, the Obama administration, and Russia—apologies if I left anyone out—there were strands of sheer nastiness running through Abbas’s speech. Referring to “Palestine” as the “land of holiness,” he spoke reverentially of Jesus and Muhammed, but deliberately omitted any mention of the deep and historic Jewish ties to the land: the Davidic and Hasmonean kingdoms that reigned there, for example, or the jewel in the crown that was the Temple in Jerusalem. (Read more from “Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas Has a Nightmare Vision” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Watch: Arab Harassment of Jews in Jerusalem Terrorizes Children

Two amateur video clips circulating on social media, both posted in Arabic, provide a glimpse into the less-reported side of the escalating tensions in and around Jerusalem.

One shows a mob of angry Arabs verbally harassing Jews, among them children, as they make their way to the Western Wall on Monday, the first day of the Sukkot holiday. Loud chants of “allahu akbar” accompany menacing fist-waving at passers-by.

The other captures a young Muslim man planting a hard, swift kick on a baby stroller being pushed by a father with a tallit (Jewish prayer shawl) on his head. Here, too, taunting and shouting in Arabic can be heard, while the father whisks his child away from the scene of the Old City of Jerusalem site as fast as he can.

These incidents are part of the ongoing riots – characterized by rock-throwing and the hurling of firebombs – that have Israeli security forces stepping up efforts to prevent the violence and bring its perpetrators to justice. (Read more from “Watch: Arab Harassment of Jews in Jerusalem Terrorizes Children” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.