During his primetime address, former President Bill Clinton looked back on his life with Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, highlighting moments that he judged significant. Yet Clinton’s speech was subject to withering criticism from the left, with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow calling Clinton’s speech “shocking and weird.” Significantly, as the former President went through the years, reporters started noticing significant moments were curiously missing. People following along with the speech on Twitter, saw a much more accurate reflection of Bill and Hillary Clinton’s political careers, filled with political scandals . . .
Bill didn’t mention the name of Hillary’s law firm. He doesn’t want you to google “Rose law firm billing records” https://t.co/rGCCSvwKfe
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/24507305865_91a4a3c5f9_b-3.jpg6831024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-07-27 22:28:502016-07-27 22:28:50FIRE UP THE ACCESS DATABASE: The Scandals Bill Clinton Forgot to Mention in His Speech
Department of Labor (DOL) officials likely violated federal law when they said they had records requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), then six years later said they didn’t and deleted an email account that proved otherwise, Americans for Limited Government (ALG) said in a FOIA appeal Tuesday.
“At best, this is a case of mismanagement,” ALG President Nathan Mehrens told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “At worst, well, use your imagination. Are they hiding something and trying to run out the clock in order to avoid sunlight into their operations?”
ALG claims in an appeal to the DOL solicitor general that department officials likely violated FOIA and the Federal Records Act by failing to conduct a reasonable search for documents and destroying potentially relevant email records . . .
Mehrens requested on Aug. 12, 2012, all DOL communications to date discussing Wage and Hour Division opinion letters. He sought to discover why the office stopped issuing the opinions in 2009. The opinions offered official positions on issues such as whether a particular occupation is exempt from overtime laws.
DOL officials said they were reviewing responsive documents. Wage and Hour FOIA officer William Nardo told Mehrens Feb. 7, 2012, that he had “received responsive material from our subject matter experts,” according to ALG records obtained by The DCNF. “We must now review and redact information in accordance with the exemptions of FOIA.” (Read more from “U.S. Labor Department Illegally Deleted Records, Says Watchdog Group” HERE)
A cook at restaurant chain Noodles & Company denied service to a police officer in uniform Monday night in Alexandria, Virginia.
A female officer with the Alexandria Police Department walked into the restaurant on Duke Street for a meal at roughly 6:30 p.m. when an employee came out of the kitchen, pointed at the officer and said they would not cook for her. The officer said the employee also made a joke she could not hear and other employees started laughing at her, reports NBC Washington.
“You’re going to have to take me off the line, I ain’t serving that,” the unidentified employee said to a cashier in the store.
The officer left the store without being served and reported the incident to her supervisor. Alexandria Committee of Police Vice President Peter Feltham said the manager of the restaurant is investigating the incident and will “discipline” any employees involved, reports WUSA9 . . .
Feltham and Alexandria Police Chief Earl Cook met with the manager at the restaurant, who apologized for the actions of his employees. He also reportedly agreed to post signs reading “We Support Blue Lives” on the restaurant’s doors. (Read more from “Police Officer Denied Service at Restaurant, Cook Says ‘I Ain’t Serving That'” HERE)
Republican Vice Presidential Nominee Gov. Mike Pence issued a statement saying Russia should face “serious consequences” if it hacked the Democratic National Committee, at nearly the exact same time Republican Nominee Donald Trump told reporters “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.”
Trump continued, “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
Pence’s statement by contrast reads, “If it is Russia and they are interfering in our elections, I can assure you both parties and the United States government will ensure there are serious consequences.” Espionage, it should be noted, in all forms, is widely considered fair game in the international world. Trump’s comments, even in jest, go a step further by appearing to encourage a foreign power’s hacking of an American leader.
Trump doubled down shortly after the press conference, tweeting “If Russia or any other country or person has Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 illegally deleted emails, perhaps they should share them with the FBI!”
Reports now indicate U.S. intelligence agencies have told the White House they now assess with “high confidence” that Russia was responsible for hacking the Democratic National Committee’s email server. Trump told reporters if Russia is behind the hack it only exhibits the weakness of the Obama administration, and that when he was in office respect for America by Putin would be restored. (Read more from “Pence Breaks With Trump on Russian Hacking” HERE)
With the upcoming presidential race set to go full tilt, questions are beginning to surface as to when Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will hold her next press conference.
When Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager was asked during a luncheon held by The Wall Street Journal if Clinton would schedule a press conference prior to Election Day, he laughed and said, “We’ll see.”
The Washington Post reports Clinton’s last press conference was held on Dec. 4.
Washington Post columnist Margaret Sullivan, in an attempt to draw attention to Clinton’s lack of press conferences, wrote, “The candidate, famously opaque, answered a grand total of seven questions [in Iowa] on Dec. 4, 2015. Since then, although she’s given individual interviews, she hasn’t made herself available for general media questioning.”
Clinton has responded to inquiries into her lack of press conferences by drawing attention to the one-on-one interviews she has granted, along with answering general questions from the media.
Ruth Marcus, editorial board editor for The Washington Post, asked Mook if a Clinton administration would continue to decline press conferences.
Mook refused to speculate on the events following the election, adding that he would be on vacation at that time.
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has blasted the media for allowing Clinton to go so long without a press conference.
While he was speaking with the press in Miami on Wednesday, he said, “It’s been 235 days since crooked Hillary Clinton has had a press conference and you as reporters who give her all these glowing reports should ask yourselves why. I’ll tell you why: Despite the nice platitudes, she’s been a mess.”
Trump went on to criticize the Democratic National Convention for its failure to mention ISIS or the plight of police officers in the U.S. (For more from the author of “Clinton Campaign Manager Laughs, Evades Reporter’s Question” please click HERE)
As Democrat after Democrat took the convention stage Wednesday night to deliver a sermon on gun violence, they kept repeating an age old lie about gun crime that was debunked recently by these pesky little things called … facts.
A new report published by the University of Pittsburgh “confirms what gun rights advocates have said for a long time,” the Washington Post reports. Namely, that lawful gun owners are not responsible for the large, large majority of gun crimes and therefore new gun control measures would only serve to burden those lawful gun owners.
According to Christopher Ingraham of The Washington Post:
[Researchers] found that in approximately 8 out of 10 cases, the perpetrator was not a lawful gun owner but rather in illegal possession of a weapon that belonged to someone else.
More than 30 percent of the guns that ended up at crime scenes had been stolen, according to Fabio’s research. But more than 40 percent of those stolen guns weren’t reported by the owners as stolen until after police contacted them when the gun was used in a crime.
More so, based on past research, the vast majority of gun dealers do not have any guns used for criminal activity. In fact, says Ingraham, only “1 percent of dealers accounted for nearly 6 in 10 crime gun traces” in a 2000 study.
Here’s the bottom line: Gun owners and gun dealers are NOT the problem. New gun control legislation taking guns out of the hands of good guys will only serve to make America less safe. (For more from the author of “Democrats Lie Through Their Teeth About Gun Crime at the DNC” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/gun-control-1422577_960_720.jpg720718Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-07-27 21:06:072016-07-27 21:06:07Democrats Lie Through Their Teeth About Gun Crime at the DNC
Donald Trump’s lengthy press conference Wednesday during DNC week made headlines for a number of reasons, not the least of which being his call on Russia to find Hillary Clinton’s 30,00 missing emails.
But amazingly, what the mainstream media has refused to cover is while Trump regularly and openly speaks to the press, Hillary Clinton is hiding.
It has been 236 DAYS since Hillary Clinton’s last press conference on Dec. 4, 2015.
Last month the RNC made their own hypothesis as to why Clinton has avoided the press:
How has the Clinton campaign gotten away with this? Shouldn’t the press be fired up about her inaccessibility? (For more from the author of “It Has Been 236 DAYS Since Hillary Last Spoke to the Press” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/24525915762_7406c8f614_b.jpg6831024Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-07-27 21:01:452016-07-27 21:01:45It Has Been 236 DAYS Since Hillary Last Spoke to the Press
The Dems are pulling out every possible stop to push their extreme pro-abortion agenda at the party’s national convention in Philadelphia.
A day after Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richard’s brazen speech against basic safety requirements for abortion clinics—which a vast majority of Americans actually agree with—NARAL Pro-Choice America president Ilyse Hogue took the stage to talk about just how wonderful it was that she was able to abort her first child.
“I wanted a family, but it was the wrong time. I made the decision that was best for me – to have an abortion – and was able to get compassionate care at a clinic in my own community,” said Hogue. “Now, years later, my husband and I are parents to two incredible children.”
However, one can be certain that if the child she aborted could actually speak for itself, his or her outlook wouldn’t be so inspired.
Here’s an excerpt from Hogue’s speech, right before she goes into her attack on the Trump-Pence GOP ticket. Below Hogue’s remarks in italics are the same sections, rewritten from the perspective of an unborn child facing an abortion:
To succeed in life, we have to have it first. I was unfortunate enough to be conceived after 1973, a time period wherein at least 58 million of my other unborn counterparts. I wanted to have a life outside the womb, but someone decided that it was the wrong time for them to even put me up for adoption. I may have siblings who can grow, play, learn and love now. Not so much for me, though.
My mother made the decision that was right for her. While she received compassionate care that could have just as easily been offered at a crisis pregnancy center, I was either subjected to a toxic saline solution, starved as a result of a hormone treatment, or dissected limb from limb before being pulled in pieces from her womb.
My story is not unique. According to 2012 statistics from the Centers for Disease Control, as recently as 2012, there were 210 of us aborted for every 1,000 that were born in the United States. It’s not just as simple as whether I we are in our first, second, or third trimester, or whether it’s the “right time” for us to exist, we are the same children at different stages of development—not able to make decisions that will determine our life or death.
If we want children to succeed, we start by letting all of them live. Provide biological accurate information about what we are, and respect our human right to life, even if it isn’t convenient. That’s what Hillary Clinton has spent decades fighting against.
(For more from the author of “If an Unborn Child Could Speak at the Democrat National Convention” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/pregnant-214522_960_720.jpg640960Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-07-27 20:54:342016-07-27 20:54:34If an Unborn Child Could Speak at the Democrat National Convention
Flying used to be a luxury only the rich could afford. Advances in the airline industry making travel more efficient and affordable have expanded the mobility of hundreds of millions of Americans.
But a decision by the Environmental Protection Agency is likely to take air travel backward.
The EPA on Monday released a final “endangerment finding” that greenhouse gases from large commercial aircraft cause climate change and endanger “Americans’ health and the environment.”
It comes as no surprise that the Obama administration would reach to the skies and add airplanes to the list of its regulatory targets. The administration has been eager to regulate as many sources of greenhouse gas emissions as possible—including cars, trucks, gasoline, and power plants, among others.
And like every other global warming policy, this one will hurt the middle class and poor the most and have next to no impact on global temperatures.
EPA first made the proposal last June as United Nations discussions to set international airline standards were underway and the Obama administration sought to create momentum for a climate agreement in Paris.
What kind of impact might these regulations have on global warming? Not much.
Even if one believes in catastrophic global warming, greenhouse gas emissions from the airlines are peanuts in the grand scheme of things.
Airlines produce only 3 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S., or half a percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. If the U.S. eliminated all carbon dioxide emissions—not just from planes, but every single source of carbon dioxide-emitting activity—a rise of only 0.137 degree Celsius would be averted by 2100.
Even as part of a larger international effort, the efforts by the EPA and the U.N. don’t add up to much. A draft of the first international standards, released in February by the U.N.’s International Civil Aviation Organization, is likely to be finalized in October.
Projections are underwhelming: The standards will reduce fuel consumption by 4 percent on average and lower global carbon dioxide emissions by 650 million tons over the course of 20 years. It sounds like a lot, except that 770 million tons were emitted in 2015 alone.
Zooming out further, carbon dioxide emissions from airplanes contribute a mere 2 percent of total global emissions, making the international standards even more irrelevant.
They’re “not worth the price of paper [they are] printed on,” according to Vera Pardee, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, which advocates drastic cuts in carbon dioxide emissions.
Yet the Obama administration heralded the international standards as “an important signal that the international community is well-positioned to rise to the challenge of implementing a global market-based approach to reduce aviation emissions.”
The EPA’s new endangerment finding is now the agency’s legal foundation to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from airplanes.
The EPA said it “anticipates moving forward on standards that would be at least as stringent as [U.N.] standards.” In other words, the EPA has created its own legal mandate to regulate, all without the input of Congress.
In fact, even if the EPA under the next administration chooses not to act on the new endangerment finding, outside groups can sue the agency to “do its duty” under the Clean Air Act and force it to set regulations (as some groups already have done).
While the EPA has yet to propose regulations, it is likely they will come with a price tag, if the U.N. standards are any clue.
Like every other greenhouse gas regulation from the EPA, they would be a tax on energy use that necessarily gets passed on to the customer, in this case those who travel by air. And for no environmental gain.
Congress needs to step in and prohibit the EPA and any other federal agency from regulating greenhouse gases. Regardless of what ones believes about global warming, this finding and whatever regulations result will have no meaningful impact on global temperatures. (For more from the author of “You Could Pay More to Fly Under This EPA Climate Change Rule” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/flight-sky-clouds-fly.jpg40006000Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-07-27 20:37:342016-07-27 20:37:34You Could Pay More to Fly Under This EPA Climate Change Rule
Susanna Ruth Makinson can blame a lot of things for why her then-husband was shot dead eight years ago while patrolling the streets of Fort Myers, Florida, the first time since 1930 a police officer had been gunned down in the city.
That’s because, in a distant way out of her—and his—control, Andrew Widman’s death felt preventable; his killer, Abel Arango, was an illegal immigrant and convicted felon who was released from detention because his native Cuba wouldn’t take him back.
But though Makinson wishes the government would do more to fix this little-known problem in the immigration system, to do more to pressure uncooperative countries to accept their citizens who are here illegally and commit crimes, she also has gained a lifetime of perspective raising three kids without their father.
“It’s a huge problem that criminals take advantage of; most people don’t know it’s possible for the originating country to decline the person being deported,” Makinson told The Daily Signal in an interview. “It bothers me. At the same time, what if I had been sick that day and my husband hadn’t gone to work? I would go crazy thinking through every ‘what if’ scenario. I try not to do that. We don’t live in a perfect world.”
Pressure to Do More
Yet in 2016, the inability to deport criminals continues to frustrate lawmakers, advocates of tougher immigration laws, and families who’ve been victimized by violent offenders.
According to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), an agency of the Department of Homeland Security, thousands of illegal immigrants with criminal convictions have been released from custody—some who’ve committed crimes like assault and murder—because they can’t be repatriated.
As of May, ICE classified 23 countries, including China, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, and Libya, as being “recalcitrant,” or uncooperative.
That lists also still includes Cuba, a country with which the Obama administration restored diplomatic relations with last year after five decades of hostility.
“We shouldn’t allow other countries to dictate who will be deported from the United States,” said Jessica Vaughan of the Center for Immigration Studies. “The Obama administration has been passive on this and not used the tools Congress has given them to address this problem.”
Deporting illegal immigrants is more complex than simply sending them on a plane home.
Like anyone traveling abroad, those destined for deportation need documentation, like a passport.
If the native country refuses to issue those papers, the U.S. cannot deport people there.
But critics say the government can be more aggressive in using diplomatic leverage to pressure countries to comply.
Under immigration law, the State Department can deny visas to citizens of countries that refuse to repatriate their nationals.
The government is reluctant to use this authority, however. A State Department official told The Daily Signal that the government has refused to issue visas to only one nation, in 2001 against the South American nation of Guyana.
“Visa restrictions are not imposed lightly,” the State Department official said. “For many years, we have worked with DHS [Department of Homeland Security] to review the status of each recalcitrant country on a case-by-case basis. We engage at the highest levels to resolve these issues diplomatically when possible, while remaining ready to invoke visa restrictions, as warranted, in consultation with DHS.”
Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, wrote a letter last month to Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson urging him to work with the State Department to more liberally administer visa sanctions to noncompliant countries.
“The Department of Homeland Security and the State Department together have an effective tool to discourage this behavior, and it’s high time they use it,” Grassley told The Daily Signal in an emailed statement. “No other American family should have to endure a tragedy because criminal immigrants are allowed to stay in this country, even if foreign countries won’t take responsibility.”
In addition, Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., plans to introduce legislation to sanction countries that won’t take back their citizens.
One of the most egregious crimes occurred in Blumenthal’s state. Last month, Jean Jacques, an illegal immigrant from Haiti, was sentenced to 60 years in prison for murdering Casey Chadwick, a 25-year-old woman from Norwich, Connecticut.
Jacques, 41, had a previous attempted murder conviction and should have been deported, but Haiti would not take him back because they said he could not prove he was a citizen.
Challenges to Deportation
The government faces a number of challenges in deporting illegal immigrants who commit crimes here.
A 2001 Supreme Court decision, Zadvydas v. Davis, said that the government cannot indefinitely detain an immigrant just because that person’s country of origin declines to accept his repatriation. If the immigrant cannot be deported after six months, they must be released from custody. However, according to ICE, immigration authorities can hold immigrants longer in a “very narrow category of cases involving special circumstances, including certain terrorist [activities] and dangerous individuals with violent criminal histories.”
But immigration officials argue the legal standard for keeping an immigrant in detention for that reason is tough to meet.
“The Supreme Court’s Zadvydas decision has required ICE to release thousands of dangerous individuals,” said ICE Deputy Director Daniel Ragsdale in testimony before Congress this month. “Sadly, ICE records indicate a number of these aliens have gone on to commit additional crimes while in the United States.”
Despite the hurdles, ICE and the State Department claim to be making progress.
In fiscal year 2015, Ragsdale told Congress, ICE was able to remove convicted criminals to 10 countries, including Uganda and Sudan, which did not previously accept its citizens back.
The State Department and ICE are pursuing other avenues to push countries to cooperate.
An ICE official told The Daily Signal that the agency has sent 125 letters this fiscal year to nation’s embassies in the U.S. seeking cooperation in the deportation process. The official said ICE has issued more of these letters this year than in any other year.
Also, before resorting to visa sanctions, the government can recall a recalcitrant country’s ambassador to the U.S. for a meeting.
‘Andy’s Story’
Despite these efforts at improvement, uncooperative nations continue to contribute to a glaring weakness in the U.S. immigration system, leading to tragic consequences.
Makinson, the then-wife of Widman, the murdered Fort Myers police officer, cannot be the agent of change people may want her to be.
Now 37 years old and remarried, Makinson is consumed with raising the three kids she had with Widman, in a place far away from Fort Myers, in Franklin, North Carolina.
It would have been too hard to remain in a city where her deceased husband’s legacy literally exists—the street outside the Fort Myers police station was renamed Widman Way.
But Makinson still holds dear her relationship with Widman, which began when the couple met at Toccoa Falls Bible College in Toledo, Ohio.
It was there that Widman studied to become a missionary, before he was later attracted to the service of law enforcement.
“He was very community minded,” Makinson said. “He wasn’t in police work because he wanted to prove something. He really want to help people and impact their lives, and he thought this was a good way.”
Widman had been at the police department less than year—and patrolling his own car for even less time than that—when he was called to patrol downtown Fort Myers in the early morning hours of a muggy July night in 2008.
The clubs and bars were letting out when Widman intervened on a verbal argument between Arango, the Haitian immigrant, and a woman. Arango shot Widman, 30, from close range in the face, killing him instantly.
Widman’s surviving children, Samuel, Sasha, and Sylvia, carry his last name, they know his story, and will carry it on.
“The conversations about Andy [Widman] never stop,” Makinson said. “This is their history, this is their life and it always will be. It’s helped them to be free to talk about him and ask me questions—anything from, ‘I don’t like carrots; did dad like carrots?’ To my son asking me what his voice sounds like, and I tell him it sounds like his dad.”
Samuel, the oldest, was only 4 when Widman was killed. He shares his father’s spiritual, thoughtful demeanor, Makinson says.
The children refer to Makinson’s new husband, Jonathan, as “dad.” Their biological father has his own special title. “We talk about him as ‘dad in heaven,’” Makinson said.
Makinson is trying to fulfill her own life, and her children’s lives, as best she can, while preserving meaning from Widman’s.
“The most courageous thing I’ve ever done with my entire life is moving to participate in life and be a real person for my children after Andy’s death,” Makinson said. “But I’m still hoping that Andy’s story can be a catalyst for change, and if we can get that immigration loophole closed, I hope it can save other lives.” (For more from the author of “How Other Nations Stop US From Deporting Criminal Illegal Aliens” please click HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/San_Jose_May_Day_01-2.jpg23363504Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2016-07-27 20:31:302016-07-27 20:31:30How Other Nations Stop US From Deporting Criminal Illegal Aliens