ISIS Orders Its Franchises to Kill Christians

By Philip Obaji Jr. The so-called Islamic State has different strategies in different parts of the world, but in Africa and in Europe, certainly, its core objective is becoming clear: to kill Christians. Its long-term goal: to provoke a new Crusade, reviving the holy wars of many hundreds of years ago in the belief that this time around Islam will win.

In practical terms, this focus on a single pervasive, easily targeted enemy is useful to a “caliphate” under pressure that is trying to keep its troops in line.

The way ISIS has handled its Nigerian disciples in the terror organization called Boko Haram, best known for kidnapping girls and using women and children as suicide bombers, is a perfect case in point.

Earlier this month, a man named Abu Musab al-Barnawi announced that he had taken over the infamous Boko Haram organization. And his first message as Boko Haram’s leader was as clear as it was concise—on his watch, the group’s main focus will be killing Christians.

According to an interview published this month by the self-proclaimed Islamic State group (ISIS), al-Barnawi threatened to bomb churches and kill Christians, but will no longer attack places used by Muslims. (Read more from “ISIS Orders Its Franchises to Kill Christians” HERE)

_____________________________________

Nigeria Chibok Girls: Boko Haram Video Shows Captives

By BBC. The Nigerian Islamist group Boko Haram has released a video showing some of the schoolgirls they abducted from the northern town of Chibok.

Some 50 girls are shown with a gunman who demands the release of fighters in return for the girls, and says some girls died in air strikes.

The government says it is in touch with the militants behind the video.

A journalist who had contact with Boko Haram has been declared a wanted man by the Nigerian army.

The group is said to be holding more than 200 of the 276 final-year girls it seized from a school in April 2014. (Read more from “Nigeria Chibok Girls: Boko Haram Video Shows Captives” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Hillary Slips After ‘Creepy’ Hug From Biden

Vice President Joe Biden, who is notorious for his inability to keep his hands to himself in public, just shared a ridiculously long hug with none other than Hillary Clinton . . .

Biden grabbed Mrs. Clinton around the waist and held on for nearly 20 seconds, while Clinton squirmed and patted his arm several times . . .

As luck would have it, Biden got another opportunity later in the day to cozy up to Clinton when she briefly lost her footing while stepping down from the podium following her campaign speech.

Clinton has a history of falling. After fainting and falling in 2013 while U.S. secretary of state, she was treated for a blood clot in a vein in her head at NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia hospital . . .

Photos, published by the Reuters and Getty news agencies, show Clinton, 68, receiving help as she tries to ascend a staircase in front of a home. The images were actually taken in February when the former first lady was campaigning for president in South Carolina, as WND reported. (Read more from “Hillary Slips After ‘Creepy’ Hug From Biden” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Proposes Values Test for Would-Be Immigrants in Fiery ISIS Speech

Donald Trump on Monday upped his call for action against radical Islam in an effort to reclaim the offensive on national security, proposing an ideological test to keep would-be immigrants with radical views out of the US.

The proposal was one of several Trump outlined in an Ohio speech laying out his vision for fighting Islamic extremism. In doing so, he sought to turn the tables on critics who are depicting him as unfit to serve as commander in chief and accused Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton of lacking the “mental and physical stamina” to fight ISIS.

Trump’s speech coincided with sagging poll numbers in key swing states, as the Republican nominee has lurched from one controversy to the next. Top Republicans have called on Trump to straighten out his flailing campaign.

Painting a grim picture of a world under attack and a homeland threatened by terrorism, Trump argued only he could be trusted to confront the present dangers. He characterized the fight as an ideological struggle on par with that of the Cold War that demands a sweeping rethink of US policies at home and abroad. (Read more from “Trump Proposes Values Test for Would-Be Immigrants in Fiery ISIS Speech” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

ANALYSIS: TRUE — Yes, Obama and Hillary Co-Founded ISIS

Even the left-stream media is now acknowledging that Donald Trump “has a point” when he blasts Hillary and Obama for creating ISIS.

“Hillary Clinton is vulnerable. ISIS did gain strength during her time as Secretary of State,” said ABC News correspondent Martha Raddatz.

Conservative talk show host Hugh Hewitt tried to give Mr. Trump an out. “I know what you meant,” he suggested. “You meant that he [Obama] created the vacuum, he lost the peace.”

“No,” Trump replied. “I meant, he’s the founder of ISIS. I do. He was the most valuable player. I give him the most valuable player award. I give her, too, by the way, Hillary Clinton.”

Trump is correct – and quite literally, so.

First, a document. Then some history.

Thanks to Judicial Watch, we now have an August 2012 defense intelligence report on the civil war in Syria and the situation in Iraq that openly states that the policy of the United States and its allies was to support the Salafist opposition to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.

That opposition, at the time spearheaded by Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) and the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), soon morphed into the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham, ISIS.

The report appears to have originated from U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) in Iraq, well before their intelligence product was tarnished by political interference from top commanders in 2014 aimed at diminishing the threat from ISIS.

Here’s what the report, originally stamped SECRET, actually says:

AQI, through the spokesman of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), Abu Muhammad al- Adnani… is calling on the Sunnis in Iraq, especially the tribes in the border regions (between Iraq and Syria), to wage war against the Syrian regime…

Opposition forces are trying to control the eastern areas (Hasaka and Der Zor) adjacent to the Western Iraqi provinces (Mosul and Anbar), in addition to neighboring Turkish borders. Western countries, the Gulf States and Turkey are supporting these efforts… [emphasis mine]

There is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in Eastern Syria (Hasak and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want…

It is no secret that the United States was supporting the Syrian opposition in 2012 and even until very recently. In December 2012, thanks in large measure to the active lobbying of Mrs. Clinton and U.S. Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford, Obama declared that the United States considered the opposition as “the legitimate representative of the Syrian people.”

What was secret until the release of this August 2012 defense intelligence report is that the United States knew that the Syrian opposition was dominated by al Qaeda in Iraq and the Islamic State of Iraq, groups that merged and morphed into what today we call ISIS.

So Donald Trump is literally correct. Obama and Hillary created ISIS. They figure among the founding fathers of the world’s most brutal terrorist organization. They deserve ISIS Most Valuable Player awards for their efforts.

Some of America’s enemies, such as Ayatollah Khamenei of Iran, have also accused the United States of creating ISIS – but as a tool for encroaching on Iran’s efforts to dominate the Muslim world. In fact, Obama and Hillary’s policies have simultaneously favored Iran and its rise to regional dominance, standing aside as Iran filled the vacuum in Iraq with its own militias and allowing Iranian troops and weapons to flow onto battlefields in Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Libya and beyond.

Other documents obtained by Judicial Watch show that the United States was also complicit with arms shipments from Benghazi to the jihadi rebel groups in Syria.

These particular shipments were distinct from the more publicized case of al Entisar, a Libyan fishing vessel that arrived in Iskanderiyah, Turkey, crammed with weapons in late August 2012.

The shipments described in this recently declassified document were sent directly to small Syrian ports under rebel control and included RPG grenade-launchers, sniper rifles, and ammunition for 125mm and 155mm howitzers.

As I revealed two years ago, the U.S. backed arms shipments to ISIS and its allies in Syria appear to have been run out of the White House by then-counterterrorism advisor (and current CIA director) John Brennan. Running the clandestine arms shipments outside official channels allowed Obama and his allies – including Mrs. Clinton, who supported the arms shipments – to withhold that information from Congress.

Deflecting attention from these arms shipments is precisely why Obama and Hillary hatched their “blame-it-on-a-YouTube-video” narrative as the cause of the Benghazi attacks. It was a deliberate deception to trick the American people and cover-up their misdeeds.

Obama’s disastrous withdrawal of U.S. combat forces from Iraq in December 2011 clearly enhanced the ability of AQI and ISI to seize control of large portions of Iraqi territory and certainly contributed to the birth of ISIS. It also opened the door for Iran to fill the vacuum.

But as the August 2012 defense intelligence report states, that was the plan all along. Obama and Hillary wanted to create an ISIS-controlled enclave in Syria, “in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran).”

Donald Trump was right. Again. (For more from the author of “ANALYSIS: TRUE — Yes, Obama and Hillary Co-Founded ISIS” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Russia Preparing For Nuclear War, Building Many New Underground Command Posts

Russia is building large numbers of underground nuclear command bunkers in the latest sign Moscow is moving ahead with a major strategic forces modernization program.

U.S. intelligence officials said construction has been underway for several years on “dozens” of underground bunkers in Moscow and around the country.

Disclosure of the underground command bunkers comes as Army Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, commander of U.S. European Command, warned recently that Russia has adopted a nuclear use doctrine he called “alarming” . . .

“Russian doctrine states that tactical nuclear weapons may be used in a conventional response scenario,” Scaparrotti said on July 27. “This is alarming and it underscores why our country’s nuclear forces and NATO’s continues to be a vital component of our deterrence.”

Mark Schneider, a former Pentagon nuclear policy official, said Russia’s new national security strategy, which was made public in December, discusses increasing civil defenses against nuclear attack, an indication Moscow is preparing for nuclear war. (Read more from “Russia Building New Underground Command Posts” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Coalition Urges Congress to Sue Obama Before He Gives Away Control of Internet

Arguing that internet freedom and the constitutional power of the purse are at risk, a coalition of more than two dozen civil society groups and activists are calling on Congress to lawyer up and sue the Obama administration.

The Commerce Department has violated federal law, the coalition of groups argued in an Aug. 10 letter to lawmakers, by finalizing plans to relinquish U.S. control of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority.

Though led by digital specific interest group TechFreedom, the coalition includes a number of different organizations like Heritage Action for America and Americans for Tax Reform. And they all argue that more than just internet regulation is at issue.

In policy riders attached to two separate spending bills, Congress prohibited the executive branch from using taxpayer funding to surrender control of the internet. By using government resources to prepare to hand off control this September, the coalition argues that the administration violated the spending directive and federal law. Now they want Congress to sue.

“We agree that internet governance should work from the bottom up, driven by the global community of private sector, civil society, and technical stakeholders,” the coalition wrote. “Without robust safeguards though, internet governance could fall under the sway of governments hostile to freedoms protected by the First Amendment.”

A California nonprofit is invested with what’s called Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, IANA, allowing it to curate a registry of the world’s websites.

That body, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, has operated under direct supervision of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration since 1998.

But the Obama administration announced two years ago that it intended to transfer that stewardship to a “global multi-stakeholder community.” Though Congress has acted twice to stop that effort, the administration moved forward with the transition plan.

U.S. supervision of ICANN and IANA is set to expire Sept. 30 and government officials argue that Congress only prohibited them from completing the transaction before that deadline.

After consulting “informally with both the House and the Senate” last year, a National Telecommunications and Information Administration administrator, Lawrence Strickling, concluded that Congress had not intended to leave the agency “like our hands are tied.”

“That’s not how our system works,” The Heritage Foundation’s Brett Schaefer, who also signed the Aug. 10 letter, told The Daily Signal. “Because there are check and balances, Congress has exercised a check by adopting that appropriations rider and the president signed it into law.”

Now Schaefer accuses “the administration of trying to circumvent the law” by moving forward with the transition.

Republicans have made similar arguments before. The party’s 2016 platform accuses President Barack Obama of “throwing the internet to the wolves” by sanctioning the transition. And several Republican senators and representatives publicly oppose it.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte of Virginia and Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, who chair the House and Senate Judiciary committees, respectively, came out in opposition to the transfer this June, citing unanswered legal, constitutional, and human rights questions.

“The U.S. has served as a critical and responsible backstop against censorship and threats to openness and free speech on the internet. As a result, the internet has thrived,” Goodlatte told The Daily Signal. “The future of the internet as a medium for free speech, the flow of ideas, and global commerce is at stake, and must be protected.”

But under the Obama administration’s plan, Goodlatte said he’s “extremely concerned” about the future of the World Wide Web.

To halt the transition, the TechFreedom-led coalition urged congressional leaders to file suit against the White House like Republicans did in 2014 while challenging provisions of Obamacare.

“Suing to enforce the appropriations riders and extending it through [fiscal year] 2017 are amply justified by the extraordinary importance of the constitutional principle at stake,” the coalition letter said.

Berin Szóka, president of TechFreedom, argued that that inaction could do irreparable harm to Congress and the Constitution.

“If they don’t stand up for themselves here, they will regret it in the future,” Szóka told The Daily Signal. “Future congresses will find that the power of the purse has been diminished and there’s one fewer restraint upon the power of the imperial presidency.” (For more from the author of “Coalition Urges Congress to Sue Obama Before He Gives Away Control of Internet” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

This Former Sheriff Is Leading the GOP’s Response to Policing ‘Crisis’ in America

Rep. Dave Reichert is quick to let you know why he has the life experiences to be the GOP’s authority on addressing historic tensions between the police and the people they serve.

“I have been there before, where your life is threatened and you have to make a split decision,” said Reichert, R-Wash. “I have been in battles where my throat has been slashed with a butcher knife, where I had a shotgun stuck to my belly, and each time I was able to resolve the situation without using force.”

In a 33-year law enforcement career, Reichert, 65, was a model for policing at its finest, gaining national recognition when he was sheriff of King County in Washington state by overseeing the capture of one of the most notorious serial killers in U.S. history.

But despite his respect for policing, and his success as a participant in it, Reichert says he recognizes a need for reform, and he is calling on Congress to take action.

After a dizzying series of events last month involving law enforcement fatally shooting citizens, and police officers being murdered in ambush attacks, Reichert approached House Republican leaders with a plan.

He pitched the idea of transforming a law enforcement task force he had chaired for the past year into a bipartisan working group dedicated to “having a candid discussion on issues fueling excessive force by law enforcement and against police officers.”

In July, House members announced the new working group, replacing the Republican Policy Committee Law Enforcement Task Force that only had GOP members.

“The old cop is coming out here, so excuse my language, but you can’t get s— done until you have rope on both sides trying to figure this c— out,” Reichert told The Daily Signal over two recent interviews. “We need to put some effort together to show Congress is trying to understand what is happening in this country.”

‘In a Crisis’

The working group is officially led by Reps. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and John Conyers, D-Mich.—the leaders of the Judiciary Committee.

Along with Reichert, other members include: Republican Reps. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, Doug Collins of Georgia, Susan Brooks of Indiana, and Will Hurd of Texas; Democratic Reps. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas, Hakeem Jeffries of New York, Cedric Richmond of Louisiana, Keith Ellison of Minnesota, and Robin Kelly of Illinois.

Reichert says the primary focus of the working group will be to support programs and policies that encourage better training standards and stronger hiring practices to prevent violent police-citizen confrontations.

“Obviously there are problems with the way we are policing in the United States,” Reichert said. “This is not the case in every community, but it’s true in a lot of communities across the country. I think most police chiefs and sheriffs would tell you a lot of the communities they serve are in a crisis.”

In advocating for Congress to take a more hands-on approach to policing, Reichert, a sixth-term moderate, hopes his credibility brings comfort to Republicans who fear alienating cops, and who usually take a hands-off approach to handling hostility between police and minorities.

Reichert’s colleagues respect his unique perspective.

“Dave is uniquely qualified to contribute to this working group,” House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., told The Daily Signal in a statement. “His service as a cop and sheriff is nothing short of legendary. Beyond that, this issue simply matters to him, and I know he’ll add a lot to the national discussion on policing.”

Reichert says the division is too great for Congress to ignore. He’s especially concerned with the rising number of police departments that have been forced to undertake consent decrees with the federal government requiring them to improve training and practices under court supervision.

Last week, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division released a report finding that the Baltimore Police Department has a “pattern of making unconstitutional stops, searches, and arrests” against black residents for “minor, highly discretionary offenses.”

The department must now negotiate a settlement to overhaul its practices.

Support ‘Successful’ Programs

To head off these problems, one of Reichert’s main priorities, he says, is to try and boost funding to federal grant programs that support police departments striving to build strong community ties. Critics of “zero-tolerance” policing strategies, where departments such as Baltimore focus on enforcing small violations to prevent bigger crimes, say they are a leading source of community distrust.

Reichert wants to give more money to the Justice Department’s Community Oriented Policing Services office, which awards grants to police departments and sheriffs’ offices that adopt innovative community policing strategies meant to enshrine the concept that officers build trust with the public by being visible and empathetic to neighborhood needs.

Reichert also notes the grant program’s role in financially supporting localities that deploy school resource officers, who he says are effective in combating drug use, violence, and gang activity amongst students.

Reichert says Congress appropriated $4 million to the community services office this year, compared to the $130 million in funding the grant program received in 2009.

“One of the things we know and we have seen in the past is that when people are frustrated economically, and when they see there is no hope for the future, and they see other people moving forward with their lives and they seem to be stuck, that breeds tension and frustration and it can blow up,” Reichert said. “A lot of times, that happens in minority neighborhoods. And that’s where community policing can play a role. Because you are law enforcement and in neighborhoods 24/7, you can be the conduit to connect people with the services they need to be successful.”

To further assist communities plagued by violence, Reichert says he’s working with congressional appropriators to reserve more money to another Justice Department program called Project Safe Neighborhoods. The program, established in 2001 with support from President George W. Bush, helps local jurisdictions reduce gun violence.

Among other things, the program provides funding to hire federal and state prosecutors to help them convict those who commit gun crimes; supports the training of officers so they can better collect evidence associated with gun crimes; and promotes community outreach efforts to to root out gang violence.

When he was sheriff in King County, Reichert says his was the first sheriff’s office to participate in the program, and he credits it with helping reduce crime there.

While Project Safe Neighborhoods has awarded $2 billion in funds during its lifetime, Reichert says Congress appropriated $4 million to it this year. He’s working with House leadership and appropriators on a bill that would set aside more money—potentially $20 million.

The National Rifle Association, which did not respond to The Daily Signal’s requests for comment, has historically been a strong supporter of the initiative.

“The NRA, like we as Republicans, want law-abiding citizens to be able to buy their guns and carry their guns in a safe and responsible way, but they don’t want to see people who have illegal possession of weapons committing crimes with guns,” Reichert said.

One thing Reichert promises the working group won’t address: gun control. Reichert argues that mandating stronger regulations of gun purchases is an inappropriate response to a complex problem.

“That’s the wrong discussion to have,” Reichert said. “It’s not the weapon being used that’s causing people to act violently. Gun control is not the answer to our social problems, and to the issue of mental health illness.”

‘All About Us’

Speaking more broadly about policing, Reichert encourages law enforcement agencies to be more selective with who they hire, even as police departments face greater scrutiny and struggle to find recruits interested in the job.

“Reform has to start first with who you hire,” Reichert said. “You should be looking for a person interested in serving the community who has the heart of a servant, who is not just out there for the action and the battle. To become an effective police officer, you have to make the right split decisions, which are life or death, and you need to have a patient personality and be willing to communicate.”

In addition, Reichert says police departments should implement a procedure he used in King County where civilians are included in the hiring process, and given a say in determining punishment for officers.

“You have to bring confidence and certainty back into the community,” Reichert said. “You have to give the citizen some skin in the game. Once you open the doors, they understand why we do what we do as law enforcement, and it’s not us vs. them but all about us.”

Yet Reichert also challenges frustrated citizens to respect the police, and says law enforcement professionals have a right to protect themselves.

“Education on both sides has to occur,” Reichert said. “The first thing you have to do is make it clear that it’s not right to assault a police officer, shoot an officer, or kill an officer,” Reichert said. “If you think that’s the answer to the social problems we are experiencing right now, you are going to jail. You can’t accept that.”

Last year, after two New York Police Department officers were killed, Reichert sponsored legislation requiring instant nationwide “Blue Alerts” to warn about threats to police officers and help find those suspected of carrying them out. Reichert was in the Oval Office with the families of the victims, Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu, when President Barack Obama signed the bill into law.

‘Try to Understand’

Asked about other policy issues related to policing in America today, Reichert said the decision on whether jurisdictions adopt body cameras—and the procedures guiding such programs—should occur at the local level. Though police departments are increasingly embracing body cameras as a way to document forceful interactions between officers and the public, Reichert warns about their limitations.

“One of the problems with body cameras is we have gotten to the point where we are only trusting each other because we record each other’s actions, rather than I trust you, let’s work together,” Reichert said. “Instead, it’s screw the relationship and I’ll video everything you do and then we all go to court and protest and throw rocks at each other.”

Reichert, and other members of the working group, say they hope the working group’s findings inform the House’s efforts in reforming the criminal justice system—an issue they see as related to the challenges with policing today.

Goodlatte and the Judiciary Committee are spearheading the criminal justice reform task force.

“My goal for this working group is to facilitate candid, frank conversations to understand the different perspectives of our criminal justice system,” said Gowdy, a Republican member of the police working group and Judiciary Committee, in a statement to The Daily Signal. “Then, we can begin to discuss potential legislative remedies. Trusting the impartiality of the justice system is essential to communities trusting law enforcement. If there is a two-tracked justice system, trust within minority communities diminishes.”

But policy aside, more than anything, Reichert wants his colleagues in Congress to gain an understanding of the tensions felt at the community level, and to empathize with experiences that might not match their own.

Before summer recess, the working group’s members sent each other off with a homework assignment.

“We wanted them to go home and talk with local community leaders, talk with someone who has had negative experiences with law enforcement, talk with young African-American males to hear about their interactions with police, talk with officers, ride along with patrol cops, and try to understand what the heck is going on here,” Reichert said.

Jackson Lee, a Democratic member of the working group, told The Daily Signal in an interview that she considers Reichert to be genuinely committed to learning about the divide between police and minority communities, and using his expertise to build shared respect.

“Part of the success with this [working group] will be for people to allow their hearts to be impacted by the stories and the facts and the words of the community, as well be concerned with law enforcement and their families, and their safety and security,” said Jackson Lee, who is a former municipal judge.

“Congressman Reichert has that kind of heart,” Jackson Lee added. “He is a wounded law enforcement officer, he was the officer who successfully found a serial killer, so he knows danger, but I think he also knows we need to have empathy and sympathy to really get at the root of the divide in the community, particularly as it affects minorities.”

After more than a decade in Congress, Reichert is far removed from his storied law enforcement career. But he’s still drawn to service, and right now his mission calls for him to make things right with policing in America.

“If I was 21 again, I would join up with the sheriff’s office again in a heartbeat,” Reichert said. “I love the job. It can be dangerous, but more often than not, it is satisfying. You have the opportunity to interact with the public in a positive way. The whole thing is you are there to protect the community and you want to get home to your family safely. That’s the job. As part of the job, you need to be engaged with the community so they can protect you and then everyone can come home safe.” (For more from the author of “This Former Sheriff Is Leading the GOP’s Response to Policing ‘Crisis’ in America” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Dr. Ben Carson Calls for Release of Clinton Medical Records

Speaking to Fox News host Sean Hannity [this past week], Dr. Ben Carson — one of the nation’s foremost neurosurgeons — expressed concern over the health of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

“Certainly as a person gets older, the number of medical conditions that we have to watch for increases, which is one of the reasons that we strongly suggest as you get older that you have at least an annual examination,” Carson began.

“If you’re going into a very important position like this, it’s critical,” he continued. “And that information should be something that we should have access to, because it’s very important in terms of making that decision.”

Carson’s comments came in response to a new Drudge Report headline, which claimed that as many as 59 percent of Americans believe Clinton should release her medical records.

“Also, recognize that the presidency is not a nine-to-five job. It is extraordinarily grueling and you need to have everything going for you,” said Carson.

“And also the mental capacity. There are standardized mental examinations, many mental exams, about 30 questions. You could get a very quick assessment in terms of what’s going on,” Carson added.

Carson called on the Clinton campaign to disclose her medical records to the American people, which he believes are required in order to make a fully informed decision on such a “critical issue.”

“These are the kinds of things that should be open to the public in making such a critical decision,” he said.

Hannity then turned to Dr. Marc Siegel — a Fox News contributor who serves as an associate professor at NYU’s Langone Medical Center and the Medical Director of Doctor Radio on SiriusXM — for further analysis.

“Secretary Clinton hit her head in 2012 [which] could cause the type of brain damage, possibly… that can have long-term effects, that can have effects on thinking, on memory, on gate, on how you walk, on dizziness, on balance; that’s a possibility that we need to see the records of,” said Siegel.

“She had a blood clot, she has a family history of stroke, that blood clot — as Dr. Carson will tell you — can sometimes be accompanied by a stroke. Not in this case, because an MRI was negative, because an MRI afterwords was negative, but these are the kinds of things… I’d like to see the full records,” he concluded. (For more from the author of “Dr. Ben Carson Calls for Release of Clinton Medical Records” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

America Is in Trouble, and It Needs More Than Just Freedom

America is a country torn apart. Moral confusion and societal breakdown has decimated our families and left our communities and the people in them looking for firm footing on which to stand. The cries of desperation echo throughout our public discourse and have resulted in a political landscape that is nothing if not dysfunctional.

In his new book, “Resurrecting the Idea of a Christian Society,” First Things magazine editor R. R. Reno, takes a look at the various causes of the rifts in 21st century America, and how a Christian Society ought to seek to address them.

One problem that Reno outlines is how freedom, one of the most important principles of our founding, has been wrested from its proper understanding in our public discourse, or as he says in the book, how a “culture of freedom” became a “cult of freedom.”

Reno explains that freedom is far from the end of human political involvement, but is rather the precondition for human flourishing. Furthermore, over the past few decades the kind of liberty envisioned by America’s founding fathers, the freedom given a new birth by the abolition of slavery and proclaimed by President Lincoln at Gettysburg, has lost something vital.

In Reno’s view, freedom has become unhinged from its responsibilities to the true and the transcendent. It has lost its allegiance to proper authority and has become self-seeking and destructive.

“Freedom properly understood is based in a pledge of loyalty, not a declaration of independence,” he writes, arguing that America’s liberty is derived from “eternal verities affirmed,” rather than “ties severed.”

Even the Declaration of Independence itself affirms the importance of freedom’s adherence to truth in its most well-known passage, the author continues.

In saying “We hold these truths to be self-evident,” he writes, “the first and fundamental act is holding, not choosing, standing fast in truth, not making it up. We are freest when we acknowledge the authority of the truth, now when we seek a godlike independence from all limits.”

This strive for independence from even reality itself has precipitated a great deal of the political and social crisis that America sees laid at its feet today.

A concept of liberty completely unmoored from and irresponsible to authority of a transcendent and immutable truth has led to a society in which the self is the ultimate arbiter of truth. This is a culture in which the concepts of multiculturalism and what the author calls “nonjudgmentalism” — as a better terminology for what many call relativism — have dissolved the bonds of social cohesion, allowed the state to grow into the vacuums left by a declining civil society, and created an era of social chaos in which even the biological realities of marriage have become subjects to a perverse freedom’s ever-shifting whims.

“That’s our problem today,” writes Reno. “when ‘Obey only yourself!’” becomes the first and greatest commandment, freedom undermines itself.”

“To be free to achieve our most cherished goals we need authorities we can trust, assent to, and make our own.”

And this is especially detrimental to the country’s poor. Reno argues that America does not suffer nearly as much from income inequality as it does from what he calls “moral inequality.”

While those on the social Left may look at social conservatives with disdain, the policies and cultural norms created by the sexual revolution, whether that be no-fault divorce or the latest battle over transgenderism, have unquestionably left the American working class devastated. As the author puts it, “white, secular progressives have dismantled traditional morality, disempowering and disorienting the weak and the vulnerable.”

Citing recent sociological studies that each try to explain the ongoing rift between a despondent and disillusioned working class and a well-educated, engaged elite, Reno points to the social deregulation of American society as one whose toll has been disproportionately greater on the former. While well-to-do, college educated cultural elites extoll the merits of things like no-fault divorce — the problems with which the author outlines in great detail — they seldom actually practice those things themselves, boasting lower divorce levels, more robust expressions of civil society, higher religiosity, and other positive social indicators.

In contrast, the working class throughout the United States “actually [live] the sixties,” Reno explains. In these communities, “Less than 50 percent of prime-age adults are married. More than 35 percent of those who have been married are divorced. Nearly 25 percent of children are being raised by single mothers. Sixty percent of the children of mothers who dropped out of high school are illegitimate … only thirty percent of children [in these communities] are living with both biological parents when their mothers turn forty.”

“There’s a word to describe this trend,” he concludes. “Collapse.”

Freedom for its own sake has been perverted into chaos, allowing sexual revolutionaries to push their agenda while claiming to do so under the mantle of civil liberty. Consequentially, the author states, this chaos has hurt the least among us. So what is a Christian society to do? Throughout the rest of the book, Reno outlines a vision for a Christian society in America that does not seek political power, but rather seeks to be counter-cultural force in the name of the Gospel.

This societal movement seeks to address the truth-less freedom that has been foisted upon us by elites by embracing what the author a “courageous judgementalism,” that acknowledges what social chaos does to society. It looks to mend the rifts of a splintered society by promoting solidarity through a virtuous understanding of patriotism and by rejecting the false promises of “multiculturalism” for its own sake. This culture would aim to limit government so that the “little platoons” — to borrow from Edmund Burke — of our civil society would once again flourish and allows us to cohere as communities, rather than be sectioned off as atomistic individuals kept isolated by chaos and the overreach statist institutions.

But a Christian society, in the author’s view, looks different from the Christian political movements to which Americans have become accustomed, and operates quite differently than the religious right of decades past.

“[A] religious counter-culture unimaginable fifty years ago has emerged in America,” Reno writes. “Our ambition is not to become the next establishment but to influence, directly and indirectly, the moral and spiritual outlook of the current one, turning it in directions that promote wellbeing for everyone, not just [the cultural and economic elites].”

America has undoubtedly entered a post-Christian era. It now needs the prophetic witness of the church more than ever, in order for its citizens to truly exercise their inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of (real) happiness. Christendom may have crumbled, but the Christian society in the United States, as Reno describes in his book, is not only possible, but desperately needed. (For more from the author of “America Is in Trouble, and It Needs More Than Just Freedom” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Hillary Clinton, Another Soros Puppet

As usual, Soros is behind the scenes in pushing the wrecking ball which is destroying both America and Western Civilization. Hillary has been been his cat’s paw even before she was designated to be Secretary Of State by the newly elected Obama, (perhaps he was ordered to appoint her) . . .

Soros knows he can depend on Hillary, and her handlers, should she become too ill to function while in office. Her health matters not, the goal is to get her body into the Oval Office.

The email in the post below shows practically a direct order from Soros to then SOS Clinton as to how to handle flaring unrest in Albania in 2011. How many more “suggestions” he made can only be imagined. He was behind the Arab Spring and many other upheavals. Go here for a lengthy, updated and detailed background on this most evil man, his machinations, and connections. Scroll all the way down for his most recent undertakings . . .

Contained within WikiLeaks’ recent release of hacked DNC emails is a message from billionaire globalist financier George Soros, to Hillary Clinton while she was U.S. Secretary of State, that clearly reveals Clinton as a puppet of the billionaire class.

Found within the WikiLeaks’ Hillary Clinton email archive is an email with the subject ‘Unrest in Albania,’ in which Soros makes clear to Clinton that “two things need to be done urgently.” He then directs the Secretary of State to “bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha” and “appoint a senior European official as mediator.” Revealing the influence he wields within the corridors of power, Soros then provides Secretary of State Clinton with three names from which to choose. Unsurprisingly, Clinton acquiesced and chose one of the officials recommended by Soros — Miroslav Lajcak. (Read more from “Hillary Clinton, Another Soros Puppet” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.