Alaskan DOT signs hacked to read “Impeach Obama”

Several electronic road construction signs around Anchorage were hacked late Wednesday night or early Thursday morning, according to the state Department of Transportation.

Signs that normally display closure and detour information, like the one on Minnesota Drive near 100th Avenue, were changed to read “Impeach Obama.” That particular sign wasn’t fixed until sometime between 6 a.m. and 8 a.m. Thursday.

It happened because DOT says it doesn’t lock the boxes on the signs that hold the message control pad.

Construction managers say sign-hacking has never happened before, so they never thought to lock the boxes.

DOT says that changed this morning, and now all of them will be locked.

Read more from this story HERE.

Photo credit: Tamara Douglas

Alaska Oil Output Drops Significantly as North Slope Production Declines

Alaska crude-oil production dropped 11 percent in June from a year earlier, the largest drop in almost a year, after Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., operator of the cross-state pipeline system, conducted maintenance and as output from wells declined.

Production averaged 516,871 barrels a day last month, down from 581,297 a year earlier, the biggest decline since output fell 15 percent from July 2010 to July 2011, the state Department of Revenue said on its website. The pipeline delivered 570,770 barrels a day in May.

Production peaked for the month at 592,381 barrels on June 12 and fell to a low of 380,893 on June 2, when crews scheduled valve testing.

“Any fluctuations in throughput are due to planned maintenance,” Michelle Egan, a spokeswoman at Alyeska, said in an e-mailed response to questions.

Output on the 800-mile (1,287-kilometer) Trans-Alaska crude system has declined annually since 2002 as falling yield from existing wells hasn’t been replaced, according to the state tax division. Crude-oil output from Prudhoe Bay averaged 305,132 barrels per day in June, down from 324,919 in May, the state said.

Read more from this story HERE.

Photo Credit: Arthur Chapman

Wounded Vets’ McKinley Climb Cut Short by Weather, not Disability

Five men severely wounded in war, including four who had amputations, had to abandon their climb of North America’s tallest peak, but say it was weather and not their disabilities that ended the summit attempt.

The men descended Alaska’s Mount McKinley on Monday. The climb of the 20,320-foot mountain started on June 11.

They spent nine days waiting out weather at the 14,200-foot level. On Saturday, they again attempted to make 16,200 feet, but were turned back by a blizzard.

The expedition was also close to running out of food and time on their climbing permits, factors that led to the decision to end the attempt.

Climber Stephen Martin, 42, isn’t calling it defeat; he calls his encounter with Mount McKinley a tie. “I took everything it could give me, we just ran out of time,” he said Tuesday by telephone from his home in Phoenix.

Read more from this story HERE.

What we’ve come to expect: media bias in Alaska

In what conservative Alaskans have come to expect from our state’s LSM, these outlets failed to report the most salient point of the “Offer to Enter Judgment” requested by the borough and its former Mayor Jim Whitaker, which is that it is a judgment in Miller’s favor. This is the exact final judgment that Miller would have received if he had won a jury verdict in this case, plus whatever dollar amount the jury would have awarded.

Some Alaska media outlets have published variations of the theme that Joe Miller and the Fairbanks North Star Borough and its former mayor Jim Whitaker entered into a settlement agreement, or “offer of compromise” that allowed the borough to simply pay $5,000 and avoid any statement of liability. The Anchorage Daily News entitled its story, “Joe Miller Accepts Offer of Lawsuit Compromise,” the Alaska Dispatch, “Joe Miller settles lawsuit with Fairbanks borough,” and the Fairbanks Daily News Miner, “Joe Miller, who claimed damages of more than $160000, settles for $5000 and declares victory.”

Interestingly, each of these so-called news outlets were all parties to the litigation against Mr. Miller. In fact, the Alaska Dispatch remains involved in the litigation and is actually seeking to be reimbursed for its attorney’s fees from Mr. Miller. It’s also interesting to note that each of these supposedly impartial news outlets were the same entities that repeatedly reprinted demonstrably false stories during the campaign. One notoriously false tale, that Joe was an attorney and/or was making $70,000 per year when he received a discounted fishing license seventeen years ago, was never corrected by any outlet despite the campaign’s repeated demands.

Contrary to these papers and the Dispatch blog, there was no settlement and there was no “offer of lawsuit compromise.” There is no settlement document of any type with all of the parties’ signatures. Rather, the borough and Whitaker served an “offer to enter judgment” under Alaska Civil Court Rule 68. No matter what extraneous words they included with the offer, no matter the media spin they and their attorneys are trying to create regarding “no admission of liability”, Rule 68 mandates that “the clerk shall enter judgment” and Rules 58 and 58.2 provide for the form of that judgment. See Alexander v. State Dept. of Corrections 221 P.3d 321, 326 (Alaska, 2009) (Money judgments must conform with the sample judgment form published at the end of Civil Rule 58.2.).

Obviously, if Whitaker and the borough attempt to unlawfully qualify the judgment itself, in violation of Rules 58, 58.2, and 68, and/or the judge refuses to enter judgment, this case will not resolve at this point, and will likely be litigated vigorously to conclusion. Stay tuned.


Sealaska Multi-billion Dollar Earmark Slipped into House Omnibus Bill

 

The House Rules Committee on Monday, June 18 will consider the Conservation and Economic Growth Act (H.R. 2578).  Among the provisions contained in the wilderness omnibus package is a controversial bill that would allow Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s (R-Alaska) most generous corporate supporter to clear cut old-growth trees in the Alaska’s Tongass National Forest.

The Southeast Alaska Native Land Entitlement Finalization and Jobs Act (H.R.1408) is one of 14 measures currently included in the bill. If passed, H.R.1408 will grant portions of Alaska’s Tongass National Forest to Sealaska Corporation of Juneau, allowing them to chop down trees that started growing before the Revolutionary War. Unless an amendment it introduced before Friday, H.R.1408 will be included in the proposal when it goes to the House floor for a vote.

H.R. 1408 is bad news for Republicans and conservatives for several reasons.

For starters, as I have written elsewhere, the measure is clearly payback for Sealaska’s pivotal help during Murkowski’s write-in bid. Conservatives must decide whether we will reward Murkowski’s nefarious undermining of the Alaskan GOP and her secretive attempt to earmark in an allegedly post-earmark era.

Read more at RedState.com HERE.

Editors note:  Please contact the following Republicans on the Rules Committee:

Position
Name
State
Party
Chair
CA
R
Vice Chair
TX
R
Member
NC
R
Member
UT
R
Member
GA
R
Member
FL
R
Member
SC
R
Member
FL
R

Murkowski vote sends ultra-liberal Hurwitz to the 9th Circuit

CNN reports that the ultra-liberal Andrew Hurwitz, the self-proclaimed “intellect” behind Roe vs. Wade, will be sent on to Obama for appointment following today’s Senate cloture vote:

The Senate Monday voted narrowly to end a filibuster of President Barack Obama’s pick for the California-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals after a key Republican argued the judge was too sympathetic to criminal defendants and, based on his writings about Roe v. Wade, might be a judicial activist.  By a vote of 60 to 31, the Senate got the minimum number of votes needed to move forward on the nomination of Andrew Hurwitz, a justice currently serving on the Supreme Court of Arizona.

Senate.gov shows that the minimum number of votes to move Hurtwitz on to his certain confirmation was supplied by several RINO’s including Alaska’s very own Lisa Murkowski.

Hurwitz’s elevation to the U.S. Court Appeals with Murkowski’s vote will move the Ninth Circuit even further to the left.  Hurwitz is so far outside the mainstream that the House Republican Study Committee (RSC) took the unusual approach of sending a letter to the Senate, urging his rejection.  The RSC letter stated that,

Roe stands almost undisputed as an unprecedented judicial usurpation of legislative authority in its fabrication of a “right” to abortion—a “right” that had never before existed in the Constitution.  Yet Mr. Hurwitz continues to distinguish himself among legal scholars of all stripes by standing almost entirely alone in his continued defense of what he calls “careful and meticulous analysis of the competing constitutional issues.”  Despite ample time and experience as both a lawyer and a judge, Mr. Hurwitz continues to hold firmly to these erroneous views.

Additionally, Mr. Hurwitz repeated this trend in his arguments to the Supreme Court in Ring v. Arizona.  Acting as a pro-bono attorney, Mr. Hurwitz suggested that the Supreme Court change the wording of the Constitution in order to arrive at a ruling based on his beliefs, not on the rule of law.  These two examples illustrate significant divergence from the standard we believe life-tenured federal judges should follow in deciding questions of law and fact.

Seldom does the Senate have the opportunity to review a nominee whose views on Roe v. Wade are so clearly known.  Far more rarely, do you as Senators have the opportunity to consider a judge who proudly claims their significant contributions to the creation of that opinion, and the invention of “Constitutional” protection for abortion.  A nominee like Mr. Hurwitz who played so notable a role in one of the most significant exercises of judicial activism in our nation’s history must not be confirmed.

Earlier today LifeNews joined RSC’s opposition, warning that, “Since Hurwitz is still proud of inventing abortion rights from whole cloth, we can be sure he’ll continue to pull things from the constitutional ether if promoted from the Arizona Supreme Court to the Ninth Circuit. Only then, the victims of his judicial activism won’t be limited to Arizona. They will also include the residents of California, Montana, Alaska, Nevada, Idaho, Washington, Oregon, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands — all part of the Ninth Circuit.”

Now that Murkowski has voted for cloture to satisfy her leftist constituents, watch her vote against Hurwitz on confirmation, knowing that such a vote will have no impact given the Democrat’s majority.  This is the kind of duplicity Alaskans have come to expect from our senior senator.

Alaska “Republicans” looking a lot like Wisconsin Fleebaggers

With the Wisconsin recall election in the news, it is only fitting that we take a trip down memory lane.  Anyone remember those Democrat senators fleeing to Illinois to prevent a quorum so the the Senate couldn’t pass Governor Walker’s reforms?  Looks like the old guard in the Alaska GOP stole a page from their playbook.

With outgoing Chair Randy Ruedrich and other members of current GOP leadership publicly calling for delegates not to show up to the June 9th re-convening of the 2012 Alaska Republican Convention, I’m left wondering if the demons Scott Walker just drove out of Wisconsin haven’t taken up residence in Alaska. Seems Ruedrich’s designs are eerily similar to the ill-fated Wisconsin Democrats. He hopes to prevent a quorum so the Convention is unable to take up consideration of the rules changes put forward by the Convention Rules Committee, one of which just happens to be the “legacy rule” that would relieve Ruedrich of his duties effective immediately.  No self-serving there.

Also at issue is a whole roster of resolutions passed by the various committees at the April convention, everything from censuring Senator Lisa Murkowski for her “dishonesty, duplicity . . . and extraordinary disloyalty” to a resolution urging Congress not to ratify the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and a resolution calling for the full repeal of Obamacare.

What is perhaps most egregious is the fact that the old guard is citing rumors of nefarious intent on behalf of Ron Paul supporters as a pretext, claiming that there is a move under way to suspend the rules and change out all the national delegates previously elected – presumably with Ron Paul supporters.  Supporters of Dr. Paul deny the claim.  But that notwithstanding, how credible could such a claim possibly be when less than half of the elected state delegates are Paul supporters, and it takes a two-thirds vote to suspend the rules?

I must admit the whole specter is somewhat embarrassing, but this isn’t the first time I’ve been ashamed of my party leadership.  It seems a pattern is taking shape, one that is not a little bit troubling, and one that will eventually split the Republican Party if some leaders don’t emerge who are willing to call out the bad players. We cannot afford to let a small group of  elitists tarnish the party brand any further.

When the sitting Party Chair and members of the Central Committee are openly attacking duly elected leaders in the press; when sitting members of the Central Committee are vowing to “burn down” the party; when opposition research is being conducted and deployed by upstanding “Republicans” against their own party officers; when rules are being disregarded; it’s time to say enough is enough.

From the outset of my involvement in Alaska politics, I’ve watched the elites refuse to accept the landslide election of Sarah Palin as governor over incumbent Frank Murkowski and favored challenger John Binkley; refuse to accept Joe Miller’s election as the party’s nominee for US Senate, despite the fact that he received more than ten thousand more votes than Lisa Murkowski did in her decisive 2004 primary election win; and now refuse to recognize duly elected delegates and officers of the party simply because their candidates didn’t win.

It took the same folks a year-and-a-half after the election of Sarah Palin as governor to even acknowledge her administration on the party website. They joined forces with the liberal Democrats to viciously attack the governor after her return from the 2008 Presidential race, and eventually helped to drive her from office.  They publicly engaged in malicious personal attacks on Joe Miller in 2010.  And now they seek to do the same to Chair-elect Russ Millette. There is only one crime all three of these Alaskans are guilty of: being duly elected Republicans.

The good book declares,“by their fruits you will know them.”  When folks break party rules with impunity while holding others to the “letter of the law,” you can be sure they have an hypocrisy problem.  When folks disregard the law when it isn’t in keeping with their desired ends, you can be sure they have an integrity problem. When folks have no regard for the truth, even for their own word, you can be certain they have a problem with the truth.  And when they refuse to accept the outcome of democratic elections, you can be sure that they don’t have the public’s best interest in mind. They are a law unto themselves.

The “Republicans” I speak of are reminiscent of petulant school children: selfish, divisive,  mean-spirited, slanderous, dishonest. If they don’t get their way, they just take their toys and go home. Let’s do the rank and file membership of the Alaska Republican Party a favor and show them the door.

It is time for Alaska Republicans to show the voting public that we don’t condone the rogue behavior of the ruling class. We don’t run when things get tough. Leave that to those other folks from Wisconsin. Real Republicans take responsibility, finish what they start, and don’t shy away from hard decisions.  I’ll be joining the real Republicans at the Anchorage Baptist Temple at 9:00 a.m. on Saturday morning.  If you’re a delegate, I hope to see you there.

Matt Johnson is a delegate to the Republican State Convention from District 11

Congressional Earmarks Continue: Sealaska Demands its Quid Pro Quo

Ted Stevens may be gone, but his legacy lives on.

Sen. Lisa A. Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Rep. Donald E. Young (R-Alaska) are the ringleaders behind legislation (S.730 & H.R.1408) that would allow Sealaska Corporation of Juneau to clear-cut the Tongass National Forest.

Supporters of the proposed land transfer met last Wednesday with representatives of the Department of Agriculture to discuss legislation that will allow Sealaska to make land selections from an area that includes the Tongass’ few remaining old-growth stands.

Sealaska led the charge behind Alaskans Standing Together, the super PAC that propelled Murkowski from GOP-primary-loser to write-in-winner and Republican Senator in 38 days by spending $1.7 million on a pro-Murkowski ad campaign.

Following meetings with congressional committees last week, multiple Capitol Hill sources involved in the discussions said the Murkowski-Young legislation is gaining traction in the Republican-controlled House and could emerge as part of an omnibus package pending the actions of the House Natural Resources Committee—which is bad news for the ancient trees Sealaska wants to harvest, but far worse for the local communities the corporation’s logging threatens to destroy.

Sealaska is one of 12 regional corporations Congress created through the Alaskan Native Land Claims Settlement Act of 1971 oversee the distribution to the native population of roughly $1 billion in federal funds and 44 million acres of land.

Read more at the Blaze.com HERE.

Teleconference Tonight: The Real Story on the AK GOP Party Leadership Change with Chair-elect Millette & Joe Miller

 

May 10, 2012.  The national media has recently reported on the significant leadership changes within the Alaska Republican Party as well as the vigorous protest of Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Wyoming’s Sen. John Barrasso at the ARP annual  convention.  Please join Party Chairman-elect Russ Millette and Joe Miller in a discussion about what happened at the convention, why it happened, and what it means for the future of Alaska.

Please join us tonight, May 10, 2012, at 5 p.m. Alaska Time/6 p.m. Pacific Time/9 p.m. Eastern Time for this informative event.  Participation is limited, so please sign in early.  There is no cost for participation but donations are welcome.

To join the meeting from your computer or mobile device, click or copy and paste this URL into your browser:

https://www.fuzemeeting.com/fuze/001c01f3/16490773

To join by telephone, please call:

Dial-in Number: +17759963560

When prompted enter the room number:

Room #: 926281 and press the # key.

To join by Skype: fuzemeeting

When prompted enter the room number:

Room #: 926281 and press the # key.

 

Alaska school stomps on third grader’s free exercise rights, ID’s her as a “bully”

A third grade student in a Palmer, Alaska elementary school was suspended for bullying when she allegedly told a classmate, “I do not want to play with you at recess because you are not Christian.” The comment was supposedly made to a boy who, together with no other student, teacher, or staff, recalls exactly what was said.  Nevertheless, the elementary school principal stated that the suspended girl was being a bully because she her alleged comments excluded the other admittedly non-Christian student.  The school apparently believed that the suspension of the Christian girl was necessary to protect the boy’s rights and views.

Interestingly, several weeks before the incident, religious beliefs were a discussion in the third grade classroom.  Students discussed whether they went to church and what their respective religious beliefs were.  The girl who was suspended had identified herself as a Christian.  The boy who she supposedly bullied said he was not.  No one was taken to the principal, counseled, or disciplined for any of these discussions.

As it turns out, the school administration suspended the girl only after learning that she said something about being a “Christian” during her subsequent conversation with the boy.  Not surprisingly, the parents of the suspended girl contacted the school repeatedly for an explanation for why an eight year old child would be suspended for bullying even if she really had said “I do not want to play with you at recess because you are not Christian.”  The school has refused the parents’ request to interview all the parties.  The suspended girl has no prior record of bullying.  Nor can the school document any other instance where the eight year old had any inappropriate discussions regarding religion or any other topic.

In short, the school suspended the little girl (without any due process) solely because it thought that it was very wrong for a child to demonstrate a religious preference for play and friendship, even though students make friends on other types of preferences all the time.

This type of hostility toward religion is inexcusable.  Public classrooms have increasingly become a battlefield in the struggle to maintain religious liberty in America as well as freedom of speech and preference. It shouldn’t be surprising that the battle lines are present in Alaska as well.

The real issue here is that a very young third grader is being taught that her rights to practice her religion can be trumped by the government.  She has also been taught that she really doesn’t have freedom of speech.  The hostility toward religion here is clear: if the girl would have stated to the boy that she would not play with him because he was a boy, wore a funny shirt, or for any other preference, then the school would have done nothing. It seems public schools want to brainwash children early, stripping away the vestiges of America’s true heritage.