100,000 Businesses Have Permanently Collapsed Under Pandemic Lockdowns

More than 100,000 small businesses have permanently shuttered within just two months as pandemic lockdowns devastated the nation’s economy landing 36 million Americans out of work, according to a new survey this week.

A team of researchers at the University of Illinois, Harvard University, Harvard Business School and University of Chicago discovered at least 2 percent of the nation’s small businesses are now gone after conducting a representative survey of more than 5,800 enterprises between May 9-11.

“The broad conclusion of our research is that a lot of small businesses which make up a big share of U.S. employment have daily limited resources and are under a fair amount of financial distress,” said Illinois economist Alexander Bartik who co-authored the study.

Limited cash and limited time for conditions to change, Bartik told The Federalist, could drive up that number significantly in the days to come. The team of economists found that the median small business with expenses exceeding $10,000 a month had only enough resources to stay afloat for two weeks. About 75 percent of those surveyed, said they didn’t have the resources to last more than two months. (Read more from “100,000 Businesses Have Permanently Collapsed Under Pandemic Lockdowns” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Burning EU and Other Flags Can Now Bring German Jail Term

Germany has made public burning of the EU flag or that of another country punishable by up to three years in jail, classing it as a hate crime.

The vote in the Bundestag (parliament) on Thursday makes defiling foreign flags equal to the crime of defiling the German flag. . .

The move followed Social Democrat (SPD) complaints about protesters’ burning of the Israeli flag in Berlin in 2017.

Justice Minister Christine Lambrecht, a member of the centre-left SPD, said “burning flags publicly has nothing to do with peaceful protests”. She said it stoked up “hatred, anger and aggression”, and hurt many people’s feelings. (Read more from “Burning EU and Other Flags Can Now Bring German Jail Term” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

House Democrats Pass $3 Trillion Coronavirus Relief Package

By CNBC. House Democrats on Friday passed a $3 trillion coronavirus relief package, unprecedented spending Senate Republicans have pledged to block as the major parties struggle to find a path forward on the pandemic response.

The chamber also approved voting by proxy and remote committee work. The rules changes, major moves for a tradition-bound institution, aim to make it easier for representatives to conduct business from outside of Washington during the crisis.

The House passed the rescue legislation in a close 208-199 vote, as Democrats saw defections from both the left and right flanks of the party. Fourteen Democrats voted against the bill and one Republican supported it. . .

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has made it clear he has no interest in taking up the proposal. On Thursday, he said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “published an 1,800-page seasonal catalog of left-wing oddities and called it a coronavirus relief bill.” The White House threatened to veto the legislation before the House voted.

Pelosi, a California Democrat, has characterized her party’s bill as an opening offer in what she hopes will become negotiations with Republicans on another round of fiscal relief. On Friday, she criticized Republicans who said they want to wait to pass more aid. (Read more from “House Democrats Pass $3 Trillion Coronavirus Relief Package” HERE)

_____________________________________________________

House Passes $3 Trillion Relief Package, Bill ‘DOA’ in Senate

By ABC News. . .The measure is not expected to be taken up in the Republican-controlled Senate, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signaled Thursday that she is open to negotiating.

One Republican — Rep. Peter King of New York — supported the bill because of the relief the measure would provide to state and local governments. . .

“We’re putting our offer on the table, we’re open to negotiation,” Pelosi said Thursday, acknowledging the long odds of the bill becoming law.

In a letter sent to House members Thursday, Pelosi maintained that Republicans had previously supported many priorities that were included in this latest legislation.

“It is important to note that more than 80 percent of the priorities in the Heroes Act have been supported by the Republicans in the four previous COVID-19 acts of Congress. We are proud of how we built on that bipartisanship and look forward to negotiations For The People,” Pelosi wrote. (Read more from “House Passes $3 Trillion Relief Package, Bill ‘DOA’ in Senate” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

A Biden Pardon of Trump the Latest Liberal Conspiracy Theory

Activists cheered when Joe Biden committed to not pardoning President Trump. But the concern at the root of the question is not based on substantive evidence any top Democrats think pardoning Trump would be a beneficial move should they win the White House.

In a Thursday MSNBC town hall, a viewer submitted a question for the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee: “Would you be willing to commit to not pulling a President Ford and giving Donald Trump a pardon under the pretext of healing the nation?” he asked, referring to the pardon of President Richard Nixon after he resigned in 1974 amid the Watergate scandal. “In other words, are you willing to commit to the American ideal that no one is above the law?” . . .

“Absolutely, yes. I commit,” Biden said. “It’s hands-off completely. Look, the attorney general of the United States is not the president’s lawyer. It’s the people’s lawyer.” . . .

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff in July 2019 tweeted an exchange with special counsel Robert Mueller that noted the president could technically be legally prosecuted for actions he took after he leaves office that the Department of Justice thinks he could not be constitutionally charged with now.

Though it is not likely, the question about pardoning Trump is a way for Democrats to allow Biden and prominent candidates to hint at the possibility of prosecuting Trump while avoiding having to make a legally and politically messy pledge to prosecute him. (Read more from “A Biden Pardon of Trump the Latest Liberal Conspiracy Theory” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Prisoner Released Due to Coronavirus Accused of Murdering 21-Year-Old Woman; A Third of Local County Jail Inmates Released Nationwide to Stem Coronavirus Spread

By NBC News 9. A parolee accused of murdering a 21-year-old woman in Denver on Saturday was out of prison, according to information shared with 9Wants to Know, due to ongoing efforts to limit the spread of COVID-19 in the state’s prison system.

On Saturday, Denver Police believe Cornelius Haney shot and killed Heather Perry, 21, in an alley between the 1400 block of North Verbena St. and North Valentia St. in east Denver.

The fact that Haney, a felon with an extensive Colorado criminal history dating back to 1998, was out in the first place has a lot to do with the state’s efforts to keep COVID-19 from spreading within the state’s prison system.

Serving the tail end of a seven-year sentence for robbery, Haney left prison April 15th, four months earlier than his mandatory release date. A spokesperson for the Colorado Department of Corrections (DOC) told 9Wants to Know on Friday that Haney “was released due to special needs parole criteria” under an Executive Order signed by Governor Jared Polis in March. (Read more from “Prisoner Released Due to Coronavirus Accused of Murdering 21-Year-Old Woman” HERE)

_____________________________________________________

A Third of Local County Jail Inmates Released Nationwide to Stem Coronavirus Spread

By Washington Examiner. County jails across America have released an average of 32% of their inmates amid the coronavirus pandemic, with some county facilities letting out more than half those in custody, according to a criminal justice think tank tracking releases.

“In the last two months, local governments across the U.S. have drastically reduced their jail populations to slow the spread of the coronavirus. The typical jail has reduced its population by more than 30%,” the Prison Policy Initiative wrote in a new report.

Clackamas County, Oregon, topped the list of largest-known population reductions in large jails. Clackamas released 63% of inmates, followed by 58% in Faulkner County, Arkansas, and 57% in Bergen County, New Jersey. The Public Policy Initiative studied daily population data from 607 jails collected by the New York University Public Safety Lab.

“The strategies jails are using to reduce their populations vary by location, but they add up to big changes,” the think tank report states. “In some counties, police are issuing citations in lieu of arrests, prosecutors are declining to charge people for ‘low-level offenses,’ courts are reducing the amounts of cash bail, and jail administrators are releasing people detained pretrial or those serving short sentences for ‘nonviolent offenses.'” (Read more from “A Third of Local County Jail Inmates Released Nationwide to Stem Coronavirus Spread” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

State Department Inspector General Is Fired, Was Investigated for Mishandling Sensitive Information

President Donald Trump fired Steve Linick, the State Department’s inspector general, on Friday night, sources told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Trump notified House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that he was removing Linick from office, effective in 30 days. He said in the letter that “it is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as Inspectors General.”

“That is no longer the case with regard to this Inspector General.”

Two sources familiar with Linick’s ouster told the DCNF that while they were not certain of the precise reason that the watchdog was fired, he was under investigation last year by the Department of Defense’s inspector general for mishandling sensitive material. . .

Linick, who has served as the State Department’s watchdog since Sept. 30, 2013, gained national attention last year when he arranged an impromptu briefing for lawmakers in which he turned over a batch of documents that Rudy Giuliani provided to the State Department regarding issues in Ukraine. (Read more from “State Department Inspector General Is Fired, Was Investigated for Mishandling Sensitive Information” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Are COVID Survivors Immune From Getting It Again?

Now that we’ve gotten COVID-19 testing for active infections well under way across the country, many who have already been infected have understandably asked if they are now immune to reinfection.

This question applies both to those who had developed only mild/moderate symptoms, and those who had more serious/severe symptoms that may have required medical attention.

It will also be important for those who never developed symptoms but suspect they were exposed, because antibody testing will reveal if they were.

A new study indicates that SARS-CoV-2 may have been capable of human transmission and circulating in China as early as last October—which is earlier than the widely accepted December time frame.

We’ve identified the first case here in the United States as appearing in late January, but it’s possible the virus could’ve been around earlier, meaning many may have been exposed to the virus already.

Human immunity, not surprisingly, is complicated.

There are two important issues in determining immunity: testing for the presence of virus-neutralizing antibodies in a blood test and the testing of the concentration of those antibodies in the body.

Regarding the testing for the presence of antibodies, a recent New York City study shows that COVID-19 patients are producing antibodies, but it can take from a few to several weeks after infection for them to show up in serological tests.

Since this new virus has been a source of severe consternation for the medical and scientific communities—as it has been for everyone—this is important empirical evidence of a normal immune response and good initial news.

The other question is, in the absence of a vaccine, what level—or concentration—of antibodies is needed to prevent reinfection from SARS-CoV-2?

That question will be answered through serum neutralization research, but some promising studies suggest those who have resolved this particular coronavirus infection likely will have enough protection to ward off reinfection.

But for how long?

Immunity to a virus can wane over time. Protection after an infection could be short-term (months), or, like the common cold (which can be caused by a different coronavirus), it could last a year or at least a cold/flu season.

A defense could go on for longer if SARS-CoV-2 turns out like other coronaviruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome, for which virus-derived antibodies have reportedly given protection for two to three years.

Even if immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus reduces in effectiveness over time, the body’s immune system likely could generate a sufficient response to prevent a viral attempt at reinfection.

Beyond immunology, successful antibody testing also will help researchers develop historical and current information about the spread and penetrance of the virus, which will guide the continuing response to this pandemic.

Even more important will be the level of assurance it will provide to those who have developed immunity in possibly returning safely to normal activity. Testing front-line workers such as first responders will be a priority.

First responders are more often exposed to the virus, so the presence of protecting antibodies will defend them not only from contracting the disease, but also from spreading it to those they help.

At this time, while there are estimates, we still really don’t know how many Americans already have been exposed and may have immunity to reinfection.

There is still much to learn about this virus, but with antibody testing ramping up, the number of those immune will become increasingly in focus, aiding the development of good public health policies going forward and an economic recovery. (For more from the author of “Are COVID Survivors Immune From Getting It Again?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Bad Medicine: The Devastating and Shocking Effects of Lockdown

“The negative consequences of large-scale quarantine are so extreme (forced confinement of sick people with the well; complete restriction of movement of large populations; difficulty in getting critical supplies, medicines, and food to people inside the quarantine zone) that this mitigation measure should be eliminated from serious consideration.” ~Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, Nov. 4, 2006

When God wanted to punish King David for a sin, he offered him a choice between three years of famine, three months of pursuit by his enemies, or three days of a plague. King David relayed the message to Gad the prophet that he chose the plague: “David said to Gad, ‘I am in deep distress. Let us fall into the hands of the LORD; for his mercy is great; but do not let me fall into human hands.’” (2 Samuel 24:14). Thus, he established a principle that a plague – which is the ultimate and exclusively divine punishment – is superior to any man-made catastrophe. If only our government had made that choice.

Whenever God confronts us with a serious challenge, he gives us natural tools to cope with the situation, but the outcome is ultimately in his hands. What our government has done is anything but natural and has never been done in human history. It was akin to dropping a nuclear bomb on ourselves to deal with a virus that posed a serious danger only to a defined population we could have protected more efficiently.

Now we are facing the nuclear-level fallout of the man-made crisis rather than the God-made crisis of the virus. We cannot even begin to imagine the near-term and long-term first- and second-order effects of every facet of our national health and lives now that we have state and federal officials who want to continue decapitating us until there is a complete cure for the headache.

In short, we overestimated the danger of the virus to most people, overestimated our ability to mitigate even those effects no matter what we did, and forgot that other considerations, especially other health concerns, exist in the world. We acted as if coronavirus is the only challenge we are confronted with and as if we had infinite resources to balance out a panicked and imbalanced response to one challenge.

It turns out that the states that shut down the latest and least severely and reopened the earliest now have the flattest curve of all – not just in terms of the virus, but all of the effects of the lockdown. For most states, we will be left with endless deadly curves that we have yet to flatten.

Here is a list of curves that none of the politicians even recognize they have caused and now need to flatten:

The steep curve of stroke deaths

Doctors from Stanford University and the Washington University School of Medicine posted an analysis last week of a neuroimaging database that show a 40% drop in stroke evaluation since the shutdown. This is due to a mix of the mandatory delays in “elective” procedures as well as the inordinate degree of panic that scared people away from clinics and hospitals, particularly those with signs of the onset of a stroke. Approximately 140,000 Americans die every year from strokes, and one has to wonder not only how many have needlessly died but how many others will lose years of their lives from not catching these symptoms earlier.

The steep curve of heart attacks

Some ERs have seen a 50% drop in heart patients. There is no logical reason why the number of heart problems should have declined, because, if anything, the stress of the crisis would trigger more hypertension. Just like with stroke patients, it’s likely that many people are too scared to come to ERs, which are seeing an across-the-board steep decline in patients, as much as 50%-60% in some hospitals in Hawaii (which only had seven total COVID-19 deaths), out of unfounded fear of catching the virus and dying.

One of two things is true: The missing heart attack deaths are manifested in the excess deaths we are seeing at home in many states, or they are really being wrongly coded as COVID-19 deaths, which would be another example of how the panic over the lethality of the virus is overstated. In King County, Washington, commensurate with a 25% drop in 911 calls is a 10% increase in EMTs discovering people dead at home. Again, our government and media are scaring people to death with this disproportionate response to the virus and exaggerating the risk to an individual vs. other health care needs.

The steep curve of missing organ transplants

The number of living organ donor transplants dropped by 90% during the peak of the lockdown. Has Dr. Fauci modeled how many people have died or will die early as a result of it?

The steep curve of missed cancer diagnoses

One study found that screening and monitoring tests for breast, prostate, colorectal, cervical, and lung cancer were down 39% to 90% and estimated a 20% drop in overall interaction between cancer patients and oncologists. As such, QVIA Institute for Human Data Science estimates that 80,000 cancer diagnosis will be missed. Given that the difference between curable or operable cancer is often a matter of weeks, that alone could cost tens of thousand of lives or millions of life years. University College London predicts an excess of 33,000 cancer deaths in the U.S.

The steep curve of maternal and child deaths

In the irony of all ironies, a new comprehensive study funded by Johns Hopkins and the Gates Foundation, two of the staunchest proponents of lockdown, show that in the least severe scenario “over 6 months would result in 253,500 additional child deaths and 12,200 additional maternal deaths” due to reduced access to food and health care, vaccinations, and child care – all caused by the lockdown and disproportionate panic. They estimate a steep cost of lives for pregnant women and young children under all scenarios.

As my colleague at the TheBlaze reported, in New York, a 26-year-old pregnant woman died of a rare liver condition as the baby was born because she was denied access to maternity health care that would have caught her dropping platelet levels before the birth. In general, New York City has seen 5,000 excess deaths that were not due to the coronavirus. They likely were due to the panic that led to missed care or people too scared to get treated.

Additionally, a report published Tuesday in the Lancet Global Health journal found that child mortality globally could rise for the first time in 60 years thanks to the shutdown of health care and food supply chains.

Also, due to the disruption in health care, there will likely be millions more dead in the coming years from AIDS, TB, and malaria, according to one estimate, although this would mainly affect third-world countries, not the U.S. However, some estimate that 80 percent of four-month-olds in the U.S. are not current on vaccines, and the number of MMR vaccines has dropped by 60 percent.

The steep curve of the mental health crisis of isolation, financial ruin, and panic

According to one study, an extra 75,000 are at risk of dying due to substance abuse or suicide. Also, a hotline run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services saw a 1,000% increase in calls during April. Based on an extrapolation of one Swiss study, we could see up to 6.9 million Americans lose an average of nearly 10 years of their lives due to the mental health crisis. None of this even takes into account the increased mental health and suicides from financial ruin.

The steep curve of an economic nuclear winter

No words, charts, or data can capture the unconscionable degree of economic depression that the lockdown has triggered. 36 million people have filed for unemployment, but that doesn’t begin to quantify the true number who lost their jobs but aren’t reflected in the unemployment filings, or who had their hours cut back. That is closer to 30% of all workers and well above that for low-income earners. Just the full job losses alone are 40% of households earning under $40,000.

Just as of now, a minimum of 100,000 small businesses have been permanently destroyed, and the market distortions created by the depression will likely destroy most other small businesses in most industries in favor of the big conglomerates that benefit from the government’s fiscal and monetary policies. Roughly half of all small businesses will be out of cash within a month.

Wow, this worked out so well, why didn’t anyone think of something like a lockdown in all our history? Well, as Anthony Fauci himself said in an interview during the 2009 swine flu epidemic, “You can’t isolate yourself from the rest of the world for the whole flu season, but use some good judgment.” Now we know why.

Editor’s note: An earlier version of this article said the child mortality rate could decline rather than rise in the following corrected sentence: Additionally, a report published Tuesday in the Lancet Global Health journal found that child mortality globally could rise for the first time in 60 years thanks to the shutdown of health care and food supply chains. Conservative Review regrets the error.

(For more from the author of “Bad Medicine: The Devastating and Shocking Effects of Lockdown” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Gowdy: Trump Family Unmasked During Inauguration Day Surveillance Reports… Wait, What? (VIDEO)

Unsurprisingly when Trey Gowdy said “the Trump family was unmasked on inauguration day”… interviewer Sandra Smith never paused to say: “wait, unmasked in what”?

During his tenure as House Oversight Committee Chair, apparently Trey Gowdy has seen intelligence reports showing the Trump family was unmasked on inauguration day. The logical follow-up question would be: who was generating intelligence reports on the Trump family?

Alas, the dangling participle never had the opportunity to dangle… go figure.

Follow the bouncing ball. If Gowdy is correct, and he has no vested interest in just making it up, then there was FBI domestic surveillance of the Trump family on inauguration day; which generated an intelligence report. Yet, apparently, no-one seems surprised by that… I digress. (For more from the author of “Gowdy: Trump Family Unmasked During Inauguration Day Surveillance Reports… Wait, What?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Senate Republicans Mobilizing to Confront China; China Acknowledges Destroying Early Coronavirus Samples

By Daily Caller. Several Senate Republicans are mobilizing plans to confront China for its delay, cover up and suppression of critical information in the lead up to the global coronavirus pandemic, the Daily Caller has learned. Options on the table even include “authorizing U.S. courts to seize Chinese government assets” once an investigation “determine[s] the damages China owes the US — and the world.”

Chinese leader Xi Jinping personally asked the World Health Organization (WHO) to delay the release of information regarding its coronavirus outbreak, German intelligence reported. Xi met with WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on Jan. 21 to request that he withhold information and delay the declaration of a global pandemic, according to German magazine Der Spiegel’s report, published May 8.

“We now know that leaders at the highest levels of the Chinese Communist Party actively hid the coronavirus outbreak from the world, silencing those who tried to sound the alarm, prevent a global pandemic, and save lives,” Texas Sen. Ted Cruz told the Daily Caller. “Next week, I will introduce the Ending Chinese Medical Censorship and Cover Ups Act of 2020, just one of the legislative steps I am taking to hold the Chinese officials involved in medical censorship directly accountable.” (Read more from “Senate Republicans Mobilizing to Confront China” HERE)

____________________________________________________

China Acknowledges Destroying Early Coronavirus Samples, Confirming U.S. Accusation

By Newsweek. China has acknowledged it destroyed some samples of the novel coronavirus in the early stages of the outbreak, but challenged U.S. allegations that this was conducted as part of a cover-up.

Liu Dengfeng, a supervisor at the science and education division of China’s National Health Commission, said at a news conference Friday in Beijing that the Chinese government issued an order on January 3 to dispose of novel coronavirus samples at certain facilities not qualified to handle such highly infectious diseases as a measure to “prevent the risk to laboratory biological safety and prevent secondary disasters caused by unidentified pathogens.”

The move came after the novel coronavirus, known now officially as SARS-CoV-2, was classified as Class II or “highly pathogenic” based on research and expert recommendations, Liu said. This decision necessitated “clear requirements on the collection, transportation, experimental use and destruction of the pathogen” in order to avoid a potential mishap or leakage, he said. (Read more from “China Acknowledges Destroying Early Coronavirus Samples, Confirming U.S. Accusation” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE