Trump Just Made This Major Accusation Against the White House About Syrian Refugees

By Christopher Snyder. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is accusing President Barack Obama of making it easier for Muslims rather than Christians to enter the U.S. in the midst of the Syrian civil war.

“If you were Muslim from Syria, you can get into this country … if you were a Christian from Syria it was almost impossible to get in and yet the Christians were having their heads cut off,” Trump told a crowd Wednesday in Worcester, Mass. “It’s the most unfair thing, this is during the Obama administration … what’s wrong with us?”

The businessman, though, did admit the challenge of proving the religion of those claiming refugee status. “Well I don’t know if you can prove they are Christian, first of all I happen to be Christian, I’m protestant, and I would love to do that, but how are they proving that.”

Obama blasted the idea of admitting people solely based on their religion.

“When I hear folks say well maybe we should just admit Christians but not Muslims, when I hear political leaders suggesting religious test for which person who’s fleeing from a war-torn country is admitted … that’s not who we are. We don’t have religious tests to our compassion,” he said at a press conference Monday. (Read more from “Trump Just Made This Major Accusation Against the White House About Syrian Refugees” HERE)

____________________________________

U.S.-Bound Syrians Detained in Honduras With Fake Passports

By Curt Mills. Honduras has detained five Syrian nationals traveling by land to the United States, and in possession of fake Greek passports.

The five men are currently being held in the Honduran capital of Tegucigalpa. The central American nation is over 1,500 miles from the United States border . . .

The men were coming from Costa Rica, and planning to make passage into Guatemala next. (Read more from “U.S.-Bound Syrians Detained in Honduras With Fake Passports” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Inspector General Releases Scathing Report on the U.S. Army’s Failure to Properly Investigate Sexual Assault

Last week, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) Inspector General (IG) released a damning report of the Army’s failure to properly investigate an allegation of sexual assault. Additionally, the report found the Army investigator’s treatment of the victim was “dismissive and derisive.” In a blistering report, the IG concluded the Army’s Criminal Investigation Division (CID) failed to follow its own rules in how to properly conduct an investigation into allegations of sexual assault, including using an improperly trained and inexperienced lead investigator with little or no oversight. Despite the IG’s forceful recommendation that the case be reopened and acknowledgement that the CID failed to investigate other crimes allegedly committed by the suspect, the head of the Army CID refused to reopen the investigation.

Col. Don Christensen (ret.), President of Protect Our Defenders, released the following statement:

“Due to the Army’s blatant failure to properly investigate this case, an accused rapist was allowed to leave the Army with an honorable discharge and no accountability. Sadly, scores of survivors have contacted Protect Our Defenders reporting they too had their allegations ignored and were treated poorly after reporting. It should be very troubling that it took the intervention of Senator Warner for the Army’s misconduct to become public. The mistreatment of survivors by the military continues to be a barrier to solving the sexual assault crisis.”

The IG report’s findings contradict a previous response to Senator Warner’s inquiry, in which Army CID claimed the case had been handled properly and in accordance with all regulations. (Read more from “Inspector General Releases Scathing Report on the U.S. Army’s Failure to Properly Investigate Sexual Assault” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Populist Outrage Explodes Over the Establishment’s Insane Federal Refugee Programs

Thank God the citizens of this country rose up to demand their tone-deaf political elites shut down the suicidal Islamic refugee program.

A conservative House member told me yesterday that he received more calls in opposition to the Islamic refugees than his previous record-setting switchboard meltdown—the pleas to vote against John Boehner. It appears that GOP leadership is getting the message they must at least pretend to care about the issue. The problem, as we noted yesterday, is that they are merely pretending instead of attacking the matter at its core.

Misunderstanding the broader threat posed by Islamic immigration, many GOP leaders are focusing exclusively on Syria and ISIS, suggesting mere improvements in vetting to screen out ISIS infiltrators. What they fail to see is that while the potential for ISIS infiltrators is certainly an immediate concern, the more foundational and existential threat is from the larger number of immigrants who agree with ISIS or adhere to strict Sharia Law. We have already admitted hundreds of thousands of immigrants form the Middle East who have clustered together and cultivated the climate of homegrown radicalism.

One could argue that Somali refugees present an even greater threat to our security and cultural stability than the Syrian refugees. While it is less likely that ISIS will infiltrate the Somali refugees based on geographical proximity, we have seen more radicalism from the Somali community than most other Muslim demographics. Over 40 known American-Somalis from the Minneapolis area have joined ISIS or other terror groups since 2008. This is something that cannot be vetted. How many of the impending Somali refugees will agree with ISIS? How many hate Jews? How many will exacerbate a subculture that is vulnerable to radicalization, like what we’ve seen in Europe and what’s already taken root in places like Minneapolis and Brooklyn, NY?

This is why any effort to bar or defund resettlement of Syrian Muslims must include Somalia and other volatile regions as well.

Since 1993, we’ve admitted roughly 115,000 Somali immigrants, mostly through the refugee program, at an average clip of 10,000 a year. Almost 100% of them are Muslim. Obama plans to bring in 15,000 more refugees from East Africa for FY 2016. In light of all the problems we’ve had from that region—not just the lack of vetting capabilities, but the lack of assimilation—how can Republicans let this slide?

Nobody expressed the problem with the Somali community better than Minnesota’s US attorney Andrew Luger:

“To be clear: We have a terror-recruiting problem in Minnesota. And this case demonstrates how difficult it is to put an end to recruiting here. Parents and loved ones should know that there is not one master recruiter organizing in the Somali community locally. What this case shows is that the person radicalizing your son, your brother, your friend, may not be a stranger. It may be their best friend right here in town.”

Minnesota is home to at least 30,000 Somalis. Many have been here long enough to become U.S. citizens. Watch this man-on-the-street video of the Somali community in Minneapolis and, when coupled with the observation of Andrew Lugar, you will see why this “vetting” narrative is a daunting oversimplification.

You cannot vet for this mentality. When most of these Somalis or other Islamic immigrants who went on to fight for ISIS or plot homegrown terror attacks were initially admitted into the country, it was unlikely they had any ties to an official terror group. Many of them came over as young children; some were even born here. But as we’ve seen in Europe, the clustering of Islamic communities in western countries, coupled with the successful pan-Islamic cyber jihad over the past decade, will radicalize these individuals once they are already admitted to the host country. The Chattanooga shooter, a homegrown Muslim freelance jihadi who killed five U.S. service-members, is a chilling example of why “vetting” is a red herring.

This is not just about Paris; this is about the record number of small-scale individual jihad attacks we’ve incurred on our soil this year alone. This is not just about Syria and ISIS but Somalia, al-Shabab and other regions infected with Islamic supremacism and jihad. Paul Ryan is wrong to suggest that the problem is only with Syria and that the concern is limited to ISIS infiltration. The concern is the survival of western civilization.

As Sens. Sessions and Cruz noted in a press release, “[I]n just the last year, refugees and other migrants admitted to the U.S. from Bosnia, Somalia, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Ghana, Kuwait and Bangladesh have been implicated in terrorist activity.” By admitting Sharia-adherent immigrants from any part of the world, we are growing the potential pool of ISIS ground troops to implement their attacks or freelance jihad in the future.

Our political class will either learn the lesson of Europe now, before it is too late, or we will all suffer the consequences after the problem is largely irremediable. (For more from the author of “Populist Outrage Explodes Over the Establishment’s Insane Federal Refugee Programs” please click HERE)

Watch a recent interview with the author below:

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

French President: We Will Go Ahead and Take 30,000 Refugees

French President Francois Hollande today promised that “France will remain a country of freedom,” defending his decision to honor a commitment to accept migrants and refugees despite Friday’s deadly terrorist attacks in Paris.

“Life should resume fully,” Hollande told a gathering of the country’s mayors, who gave him a standing ovation. “What would France be without its museums, without its terraces, its concerts, its sports competitions?

In the same spirit, he added, “30,000 refugees will be welcomed over the next two years. Our country has the duty to respect this commitment,” explaining that they will undergo vigorous security checks.

Hollande noted that “some people say the tragic events of the last few days have sown doubts in their minds,” but called it a “humanitarian duty” to help those people … but one that will go hand in hand with “our duty to protect our people.” (Read more from “French President: We Will Go Ahead and Take 30,000 Refugees” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Obama Just Made Illegal Move to Sneak Refugees Into America

President Barack Obama is determined to bring these Syrian refugees into the United States by any means necessary, including breaking the law of the land. Half the country doesn’t want them and have openly rejected the refugee placement plan but Obama doesn’t care- he writes his own laws.

National Review reports that The Refugee Act of 1980 says that the federal Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement is supposed to work in cooperation with state and local governments in resettling refugees. There’s been a lot of talk this morning that state governments don’t have the authority to reject refugees from their jurisdiction. But as the law is written, it appears that the feds are supposed to be meeting with and addressing state and local concerns — not dismissing them as xenophobic or “feeding our dark impulses” as the president said yesterday.

(2)(A) The Director and the Federal agency administering subsection (b)(1), shall consult regularly (not less often than quarterly) with State and local governments and private nonprofit voluntary agencies concerning the sponsorship process and the intended distribution of refugees among the States and localities before their placement in those States and localities.

(B) The Director shall develop and implement, in consultation with representatives of voluntary agencies and State and local governments, policies and strategies for the placement and resettlement of refugees within the United States.

(C) Such policies and strategies, to the extent practicable and except under such unusual circumstances as the Director may recognize, shall.

(Read more from “Obama Just Made Illegal Move to Sneak Refugees Into America” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Report: Al Qaeda Terrorists Entered United States Through Refugee Program

Two al Qaeda terrorists who had killed American soldiers were able to enter the country as refugees, according to a report released Wednesday from the House Homeland Security committee.

Waad Ramadan Alwan and Mohanad Shareef Hammadi, two Iraqi refugees settled in Bowling Green, Kentucky, after killing American soldiers, whom they bragged about having “for lunch and dinner.” In 2010, they were caught handling weapons, including included a machine gun and a missile launcher, that they planned to smuggle to insurgents in Iraq.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if there were many more than that,” said Rep. Michael McCaul (R., Texas), the chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security. “And these are trained terrorists in the art of bombmaking that are inside the United States; and quite frankly, from a homeland security perspective, that really concerns me.”

The committee’s report found that the administration’s refugee resettlement program proposal will have “a limited impact on alleviating the overall crisis but could have serious ramifications for U.S. homeland security.”

Jeh Johnson, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, admitted in October at a hearing before the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee that organizations such as the Islamic State might attempt to exploit the Syrian refugee resettlement program. (Read more from “Report: Al Qaeda Terrorists Entered United States Through Refugee Program” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Hillary Campaign Threatens Comedians For “Disgusting” Routines, Promises Laugh Factory Will Be “Put out of Business”

In what appears to be a first for a serious presidential contender, Hillary Clinton’s campaign is going after five comedians who made fun of the former Secretary of State in standup skits at a popular Hollywood comedy club.

A video of the short performance, which is less than three minutes, is posted on the website of the renowned club, Laugh Factory, and the Clinton campaign has tried to censor it. Besides demanding that the video be taken down, the Clinton campaign has demanded the personal contact information of the performers that appear in the recording. This is no laughing matter for club owner Jamie Masada, a comedy guru who opened Laugh Factory more than three decades ago and has been instrumental in launching the careers of many famous comics. “They threatened me,” Masada told Judicial Watch. “I have received complains before but never a call like this, threatening to put me out of business if I don’t cut the video” . . .

Masada told Judicial Watch that, as soon as the video got posted on the Laugh Factory website, he received a phone call from a “prominent” person inside Clinton’s campaign. “He said the video was disgusting and asked who put me up to this,” Masada said. The Clinton staffer, who Masada did not want to identify, also demanded to know the names and phone numbers of the comedians that appear in the video. Masada refused and hung up. He insists that the comedy stage is a sanctuary for freedom of speech no matter who is offended. “Just last night we had (Emmy-award winner) Dana Carvey doing Donald Trump and it was hilarious,” Masada said. (Read more from “Hillary Campaign Threatens Comedians For “Disgusting” Routines, Promises Laugh Factory Will Be “Put out of Business” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Glenn Beck Reveals What He Believes Obama Meant by ‘Diversifying Neighborhoods’

Glenn Beck explained Wednesday on The Glenn Beck Radio Program what he believes to be President Barack Obama’s motivation behind taking in a large number of Muslim refugees.

Anyone remember when the president said that he wanted to diversify our neighborhoods?” Beck asked.

The Obama administration determined over the summer that housing in the U.S. needed to be diversified, according to a recent Housing and Urban Development rule. The policy calls on cities to analyze their housing patterns for racial and ethnic biases, as well as “patterns of segregation” every few years . . .

“Everybody said, ‘He’s trying to develop some sort of utopia. I mean, you can’t manufacture our neighborhoods. What are you doing?’ And he said, ‘We need to have our neighborhoods much more diverse. We need America to be a much more diverse nation,’” Beck recounted.

Beck went on to suggest that the government sees accepting an influx of Muslim refugees from the Middle East to be the “perfect way” to make the U.S. “much more diverse” because the State Department — in association with nine other agencies — determines where the refugees will be placed. (Read more from “Glenn Beck Reveals What He Believes Obama Meant by ‘Diversifying Neighborhoods'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Federal Officials Liken Whistleblower to Terrorists, Murderers

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is advising its defense industry partners that whistleblowers who could expose government wrongdoing are as dangerous as terrorists and foreign spies.

According to a report Wednesday from The Daily Beast, National Security Agency whistleblower Thomas Drake was listed alongside “Ft. Hood killer Nidal Hasan, Navy Yard killer Aaron Alexis, and FBI-agent-turned-Soviet-spy Robert Hanssen” in a list of “insider threats.”

Drake however is not a murderer or a spy. In fact, as we’ve previously noted, he was the victim of government harassment.

Here’s the story:

For his efforts of trying to reveal problems stemming from certain NSA data-collection efforts to his superiors and Congressional investigators, NSA management cut funding to programs under his control at the agency, marginalized him and increasingly scrutinized his every action. Having earned himself a scarlet letter within the intelligence community, Drake attempted a different approach and began communicating with a Baltimore Sun reporter with the condition that he would provide the journalist with no classified information.


(Read more from “Federal Officials Liken Whistleblower to Terrorists, Murderers” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The True Cost of Europe’s Muslim Enrichment

The word “refugee” is a legal term, one defined by several international treaties. These documents brought the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) into existence, and sustain the relevance of the United Nations agency responsible for refugees to this day.

The contents of these treaties, however, sit oddly with how the UNHCR has comprehensively sought to hoodwink the European public about the predominant status of the demographic influx into their continent this year.

None of these documents — the 1951 Refugee Convention; the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, or the EU’s own Dublin Regulations — grants the right of refugee status to those traversing several safe countries, and illegally crossing multiple borders, to shop for the best welfare state.

Even a legitimate refugee from Syria now living, for example, in Turkey or Lebanon, loses his refugee status by paying a people-smuggler to travel to Europe. According to international law, that refugee then becomes an “asylum seeker.” Only when his asylum claim has been investigated and judged to be valid by a requisite domestic agency, is he once again a “refugee.”

So far, the world’s media has dutifully followed the false narrative established by the UNHCR. Those concerned by an unchecked and unlimited flood of Muslims into Europe — concerns grimly validated by Friday’s jihadist atrocities in Paris — have mostly been accused of heartlessness towards alleged refugees. (Read more from “The True Cost of Europe’s Muslim Enrichment” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.