Gosnell Movie Breaks New Ground

Photo Credit: College Conservative

Photo Credit: College Conservative

The College Conservative has extensively covered the murderous Philadelphia abortion doctor, Kermit Gosnell. Gosnell was charged in 2011 with 8 counts of murder, 24 counts of medical malpractice, and 24 counts of illegal abortions beyond the legal limit of 24 weeks.

What’s worse is that those charges are just the items that the courts were able to prosecute. The full horrors that took place were described in the 200 page Grand Jury Report:

This case is about a doctor who killed babies and endangered women. What we mean is that he regularly and illegally delivered live, viable, babies in the third trimester of pregnancy – and then murdered these newborns by severing their spinal cords with scissors. The medical practice by which he carried out this business was a filthy fraud in which he overdosed his patients with dangerous drugs, spread venereal disease among them with infected instruments, perforated their wombs and bowels – and, on at least two occasions, caused their deaths. Over the years, many people came to know that something was going on here. But no one put a stop to it.

The conservative media watched Gosnell closely, making sure that this man and the crimes of other men like him were exposed publicly for what they really were: murder. Despite those efforts, it’s safe to say that a majority of Americans still don’t know who Gosnell is, or the crimes he committed.

That, however, is all about to change.

Read more from this story HERE.

Supreme Court Strikes Down Overall Limit on Campaign Giving (+video)

Photo Credit: REUTERS / JONATHAN ERNST

Photo Credit: REUTERS / JONATHAN ERNST

By Stephen Dinan.

The Supreme Court overturned aggregate campaign finance limits Wednesday, freeing wealthy Americans to give to as many federal candidates as they want — though the justices left in place the cap on how much can be given to any one person.

Still, the 5-4 decision further erodes the system of campaign finance restrictions written by Congress, but that already was teetering under the weight of its complexity and previous court decisions.

Democrats in Congress said the ruling is another step toward letting the rich hold sway over elections. They warned that wealthy conservatives will try to swamp elections by giving more freely and letting candidates siphon money among themselves.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who wrote the majority opinion, said campaign giving is a fundamental part of free speech that Congress cannot restrict lightly.

“Money in politics may at times seem repugnant to some, but so too does much of what the First Amendment vigorously protects,” the chief justice wrote. “If the First Amendment protects flag burning, funeral protests, and Nazi parades — despite the profound offense such spectacles cause — it surely protects political campaign speech despite popular opposition.”

Read more from this story HERE.

__________________________________________________________________________________

Photo Credit: Rod Lamkey, Getty Images

Photo Credit: Rod Lamkey, Getty Images

Supreme Court lifts ban on aggregate campaign donations

By Richard Wolf and Fredreka Schouten.

The Supreme Court took another step Wednesday toward giving wealthy donors more freedom to influence federal elections.

The justices ruled 5-4, in a decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts, that limits on the total amount of money donors can give to all candidates, committees and political parties are unconstitutional. The decision leaves in place the base limits on what can be given to each individual campaign.

“The government has a strong interest, no less critical to our democratic system, in combating corruption and its appearance,” Roberts wrote. “We have, however, held that this interest must be limited to a specific kind of corruption — quid pro quo corruption — in order to ensure that the government’s efforts do not have the effect of restricting the First Amendment right of citizens to choose who shall govern them.”

The decision in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, which came nearly six months after it was argued at the beginning of the court’s term in October, marks the latest round in the bitter national debate over the role of money in American politics.

More immediately, it alters the political landscape ahead of November’s midterm elections and could transform state contests as well. Legal experts said the ruling also erodes aggregate contribution limits imposed by the District of Columbia and 12 states, ranging from Connecticut to Wyoming.

Read more from this story HERE.

Pro-Abortion Obama: ‘Every Child Should Have Every Chance in Life’

Photo Credit: AP

Photo Credit: AP

President Barack Obama – the first sitting president to address Planned Parenthood Federation of America – issued a proclamation on Monday marking National Child Abuse Prevention Month.

“In the United States of America, every child should have every chance in life, every chance at happiness, and every chance at success,” Obama said in the proclamation.

In March 2003, then-Illinois’ State Senator Obama chaired the committee that considered the Born-Alive Infants Protection bill (SB 1082), which he voted to kill.

According to the National Right to Life Committee, the state legislation that Obama voted against is almost identical to the federal legislation that protects children who survive an abortion that became law in 2002.

Read more from this story HERE.

Common Core: Bad Math Meets Radical Politics (+video)

Photo Credit: Matthew Kenwrick / Creative Commons

Photo Credit: Matthew Kenwrick / Creative Commons

How bad are the Common Core State Standards horror stories getting? A friend of mine in Scotland sent me this video, saying that he was speechless, and that this is so bad, they don’t even have this in socialist Europe.

Welcome to the Common Core, where children are taught the principles of social justice and socialist agitation.

The video is shocking. This is extreme material, and it’s getting almost no play outside of grassroots opposition coming from parents faced with Common Core homework:

Here we see actual Common Core materials being put out and used by (primarily unionized) government teachers across the country, in states that have swallowed the Common Core agenda.

Read more from this story HERE.

3 Victims, Gunman Dead After Second Fort Hood Mass Shooting

Photo Credit: AP / Jack Plunkett

Photo Credit: AP / Jack Plunkett

By Frank Heinz.

A soldier opened fire on fellow service members at Fort Hood on Wednesday, killing three and injuring 16 before turning the gun on himself, in an attack at the same post still recovering from a 2009 shooting massacre that left 13 people dead.

More than four hours after the shooting, all-clear sirens sounded as the lockdown at the post was lifted. Hundreds of cars began streaming from the giant complex, many including children who had been kept locked-down in schools since gunshots were first reported at about 4:30 p.m.

NBC News identified the deceased gunman as 34-year-old enlisted Army soldier Ivan Lopez, but military officials declined to name him Wednesday night, pending notification of family members.

Officials said there was no indication the shooting was terrorism-related. The gunman’s motive remains unknown, officials said, although NBC News reported that the rampage may have resulted from an argument with other soldiers in the motor pool.

The names of the victims have not yet been released, though officials did confirm that all of the victims are military personnel. Their names will be released 24 hours after all family have been notified.

Read more from this story HERE.

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Photo Credit: LifeNews

Photo Credit: LifeNews

Pro-Life Sidewalk Counselor With Baby On the Way Murdered in Shooting

By Steven Ertelt.

Nathan Trapuzzano was a young 24-year-old man who served as a sidewalk counselor at a local abortion clinic in Indiana and had a baby on the way. Tragically, he was murdered in a shooting while out walking his neighborhood.

“I am saddened to report that a young man who served as a sidewalk counselor at one of Indianapolis’ abortion clinics was killed while walking near his home on Tuesday morning,” said Cathie Humbarger of Allen County Right to Life. “His wife is due to deliver their first baby next month.”

Indianapolis television station WISH-TV has more details on what happened:

From early evening on into the night Tuesday, patrol cars and extra eyes watched the streets where an innocent man was gunned down.

“This is a safe city and that’s why this murder is particularly troubling because this is a gentleman who was just living his life, who was shot dead for absolutely no reason,” said IMPD Southwest District Commander David Hofmann.

Read more from this story HERE.

An Atheist’s Case For Religious Liberty

Photo Credit: The Federalist

Photo Credit: The Federalist

I am an atheist, which puts me firmly on the secular right. There aren’t a whole lot of us, but we’re out here, in some surprising places.

Yet I consider the current campaign against religious liberty—the attempt to coerce Christians into providing service to gay weddings or to provide abortifacient drugs to their employees, against the dictates of their faith—to be a deep cultural crisis.

Why? Above all, because the sight of a bully using a club to force someone else to violate his conscience is inherently repugnant. As a humanist, what I regard as “sacred” is the power of the human mind to think and make judgments. To put this in terms borrowed from religion, when someone uses coercion to overrule the judgment of their victim’s mind, they are defiling my temple.

But there is another, more practical reason. History shows that the only way to fight for freedom of thought is to defend it early, when it comes under threat for others—even people you strongly disagree with, even people you despise. So I’m willing to fight for it for people who are much worse, by my standards, than your average Christian.

It’s like the old poem from Pastor Niemoller, except this time it’s: “First they came for the Christians.” I don’t see the threat of coercion as something being done to those backward Christians over there. I see it as something that could just as easily be done to me.

Read more from this story HERE.

‘The Debate . . . Is Over’

Photo Credit: AP

Photo Credit: AP

By James Taranto.

“This is President Obama’s Mission Accomplished moment,” Sen. John Cornyn of Texas tells Time.com. “Jimmy Fallon Mocks ObamaCare’s ‘Mission Accomplished’ Charade,” according to a Breitbart.com headline. While the host of “The Tonight Show” didn’t say “mission accomplished” in last night’s monologue, he was scathingly sarcastic about the White House’s declaration of victory. On Monday Commentary’s Jonathan Tobin observed: “It is entirely possible that we will look back on today’s deadline and administration celebrations about enrollment as Obama’s version of George W. Bush’s infamous ‘mission accomplished’ moment after Iraq.”

Much as this columnist enjoys blaming things on George W. Bush, we feel obliged to note that he did not say “mission accomplished” during that May 1, 2003, speech. Quite the opposite. He asserted, referring to the broader war on terror: “Our mission continues.” The mission to which the infamous banner referred was the deployment from which the USS Abraham Lincoln, aboard which the then-president delivered the speech, had just returned.

But Bush did open his speech with what turned out to be a premature declaration of victory: “Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed.” Obama’s speech yesterday included a similar assertion of triumph, albeit against the president’s adversaries, not the country’s: “The debate over repealing this law is over. The Affordable Care Act is here to stay.”

More than a few Obama critics have taken offense at his declaration that “the debate . . . is over.” To them he sounded like a dictator commanding his subjects to cease dissent. But Obama is not a dictator, and few of his critics are likely to heed his implicit demand. What’s more, it’s difficult to imagine the likes of Mark Begich, Kay Hagan, Mary Landrieu and Mark Pryor successfully deploying the debate-is-over gambit in their re-election campaigns. Our guess is that the debate over whether the debate over ObamaCare is over will be over on Nov. 5.

Obama’s declaration might have come across as offensive, but in reality it was defensive. “The Affordable Care Act is here to stay” has been a mantra of ObamaCare apologists for months; no doubt they found it reassuring to hear the president himself repeat it. As for declaring the debate “over,” that appears to be a response to a particular poll finding that has given the apologists unwarranted hope.

Read more from this story HERE.

______________________________________________________________________

Compassion: Anti-Obamacare cancer patient smeared by Reid now receiving death wishes from liberals

By Guy Benson.

Welcome to your feel-bad story of the month. Remember Julie Boonstra? She’s the single mother fighting leukemia who appeared in an anti-Obamacare television ad running in Michigan:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid assailed Ms. Boonstra, and others like her, in a breathtakingly mean-spirited floor speech — going so far as to say that “all” of their negative experiences were “untrue” and “lies.” Reid now claims he doesn’t remember saying any such thing, but there’s video tape:

Read more from this story HERE.

Report: U.S. Releases 1 in 3 Illegal Immigrants Convicted of Crimes

Photo Credit: Bruce Chambers / ZUMApress / Newscom

Photo Credit: Bruce Chambers / ZUMApress / Newscom

Federal immigration officials last year charged only one of every four “deportable” illegal immigrants and released more than a third of those convicted of crimes, according to a new report based on data from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) itself.

ICE agents last year “charged only 195,000 or 25 percent, out of 722,000 potentially deportable aliens they encountered,” the report by the Center for Immigration Studies said. ICE released 68,000 illegal immigrants convicted of criminal offenses, “or 35 percent of the criminal aliens encountered by officers.”

Although the Obama administration frequently cites record-breaking deportation numbers, the report reflects what Republican lawmakers have said is a 40 percent drop in deportations from the interior of the country (as opposed to turn-backs at the border) since 2009.

“The Obama administration consistently claims that it must selectively enforce the law because of a lack of resources,” Heritage Foundation homeland security analyst David Inserra told The Foundry. “Yet President Obama has consistently sought to cut ICE’s budget, indicating that the administration clearly does not prioritize the enforcement of U.S. immigration laws.”

Under the administration’s use of prosecutorial discretion, report author Jessica M. Vaughan writes, ICE officers are instructed “to release illegal aliens if the alien is a parent or caregiver; if the alien claims to be in school; if the alien has been here a long time; or if the alien claims to be eligible for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.”

ICE officers also are instructed “to ignore convictions for state crimes if the conviction occurred under a state law that the administration opposes or thinks is too harsh.”

Vaughan, director of policy studies at the nonpartisan, nonprofit Center for Immigration Studies, said in the report that the administration hopes to “focus its limited resources on convicted criminals” by directing ICE officers not to deport “illegal aliens who have been previously deported, who are fugitives, or who have skipped immigration hearings.”

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), a sharp critic of the administration’s immigration policies, was not available for comment to The Foundry. However, in a statement released yesterday regarding ICE’s parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Sessions said:

“The preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that immigration enforcement in America has collapsed. Even those with criminal convictions are being released. DHS is a department in crisis. Secretary [Jeh] Johnson must reject the president’s demands to weaken enforcement further and tell him that his duty, and his officers’ duty, is to enforce the law—not break it.”

To the benefit of illegal immigrants, the new report notes, “family relationships, political considerations, attention from advocacy groups, and other factors not related to public safety can trump even serious criminal convictions and result in the termination of a deportation case.”

Under the administration’s enforcement policies, ICE officers “are not permitted to file charges against aliens who do not fall into the administration’s narrowly defined criteria for enforcement, regardless of the criminal charges or the circumstances in which the alien was identified.”

It’s not a reassuring picture, Heritage’s Inserra said:

“ICE officers and law enforcement officers around the country stand ready to enforce our laws, but are being prevented from doing so by executive fiats issued by the Obama administration.”

This story was produced by The Foundry’s news team. Nothing here should be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation.

This article originally appeared at Heritage.com and is re-published in full with the Heritage Foundation’s permission.

The Jeb Boomlet: Why Journalists are Promoting Another Bush Candidacy

Photo Credit: AP / Las Vegas Review-Journal, Jeff Scheid

Photo Credit: AP / Las Vegas Review-Journal, Jeff Scheid

You know who wants Jeb Bush to run for president? The pundits.

It’s not that they pine for another Bush in the White House; it’s that they need a GOP front-runner, preferably a household name.

The Republican race is too amorphous for their taste. Every story has to mention Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Chris Christie, Scott Walker, Marco Rubio and on and on. What journalists love is a two-person showdown, especially if each candidate hails from a different wing of the party, paving the way for lots of civil war themes.

Christie was their guy. A brash, blunt blue-stater with a relatively moderate approach. But the governor’s bus hit the bridge pothole, and even after the self-exoneration and those interviews with Megyn Kelly and Diane Sawyer, he is rolling on punctured tires.

So the media are gravitating back toward Jeb, who is plainly ambivalent about running. And here’s how it works: reporters call up a bunch of party stalwarts and money men and ask if they’d like to see Bush get in. Sure, these folks say. Then we report a “surge” of interest in Jeb.

Read more from this story HERE.

Threats to the ‘Freedom of the Internet are Real’

Photo Credit: AFP/Getty Images

Photo Credit: AFP/Getty Images

An Obama administration plan to give up oversight of certain technical Internet functions could open the door to a takeover by authoritarian regimes, Republican lawmakers claimed Wednesday.

If Russia or China gain new influence over the management of the Internet, they could begin censoring content or blocking websites, the Republicans warned.

“Make no mistake: Threats to the openness and freedom of the Internet are real,” said Republican Rep. Greg Walden, the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Communications and Technology Subcommittee, which held a hearing on the issue Wednesday. “Leaders such as Vladimir Putin have explicitly announced their desire to gain control of the Internet.”

Walden and other Republicans are pushing a bill that would block the transfer of authority until the Government Accountability Office can study the issue. Dozens of Senate Republicans, led by John Thune and Marco Rubio, sent a letter to the administration on Wednesday, demanding more answers about the plan.

But Democrats at Wednesday’s hearing insisted that if Republicans were serious about Internet freedom, they would support the U.S. proposal. Assistant Secretary of Commerce Larry Strickling said the U.S. will make sure that no foreign government will be able to seize new powers over the Internet.

Read more from this story HERE.