Mother Angelica’s Simple Advice on Voting Is Going Viral

Mother Angelica’s faithful voice still rings loud and clear with reason seven months after her passing, as a 16-year-old video of remarks she made on voting is making the rounds on Facebook.

The culture of death is an abomination to the Lord, and she simply cannot vote for death, she tells viewers.

But arguably even more profound and pertinent still all these years later is Mother’s pronouncement that she will not vote for candidates, but rather, for life.

“I’m not going to vote for candidates,” she states, pausing. “I vote for life … for life.”

“I vote for life,” Mother Angelica says again with profound emphasis. (Read more from “Mother Angelica’s Simple Advice on Voting Is Going Viral” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Christian University Under Fire for ‘Deep Ties’ With Abortion Industry, Planned Parenthood

“In all of its endeavors, Whitworth University seeks to advance its founder’s mission of equipping students to ‘honor God, follow Christ and serve humanity,'” the school’s website reads.

And yet the Presbyterian-affiliated school is partnering with Planned Parenthood.

Whitworth University is facilitating and promoting Planned Parenthood student internships for college credit, where student interns are “professionally trained.” Whitworth lists the nation’s largest abortion chain as their “community partner” and allows them to have a booth at their school volunteer fair to recruit students.

The prestigious Christian school also sends out flyers listing Planned Parenthood as a resource for pregnant students.

Last spring, Whitworth hosted a fetal tissue research discussion event, where they highlighted the “upside” of abortion as donating baby body parts and sought to discredit the Center for Medical Progress videos as “highly edited.” (Read more from “Christian University Under Fire for ‘Deep Ties’ With Abortion Industry, Planned Parenthood” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Satanism, Child Torture, Mind Control — What Is on Hollywood’s Mind?

Who’s up for some child torture? No, seriously. Wouldn’t strapping a boy into a chair and frightening him with satanic rituals, then electrocuting him, then doing something worse be loads of fun?

It’s what happens in the new video LA Devotee by a band called Panic! At the Disco, perhaps the most unapologetically evil entry of pop culture today.

The video opens with a girl being abducted by what appears to be a witch. The view switches to a boy being strapped to a chair by more witches. The chair is in a dungeon filled with gruesome images, like a bloody skull, Baphomet-like masks, and so forth. A video camera is shown to be filming the affair. Who is watching? Witches terrorize the boy, and at one point display a large knife before they disappear behind the boy, emerging later with a fresh heart.

The girl who was earlier kidnapped feeds the boy a drink; after drinking the boy goes in and out of a trance. Later, witches strap electrodes to the boy and then — what else? — electrocute him. The boy is shown in great pain.

Now throughout all this are interspersed images of Panic’s singer, who appears on a screen in the dungeon, sometimes with a maniacal look, sometimes with Satanic imagery overlaid on his face. The video closes with the singer, demonically grinning, emerging from the screen while snapping on rubber gloves. The last scene shows the singer lurching towards the boy, clenching his gloved fists.

Except perhaps for the lyric hinting of “the black magic on Mulholland Drive,” the music is utterly incongruous with the video. There is nothing redeeming in it. Nothing. It is pitiless, brutal, boastful. It is immoral.

It is evil.

Mainstreaming Satanic Music

Panic! is not a fringe group: they are as mainstream as they come. The group, which has other Satanic-themed videos has won many awards. Billboard is running a poll for who will sing at next year’s Super Bowl. At this writing, there is a near tie between Panic! at the Disco and another group. The NFL has already teamed with the band to produce a commercial.

Panic! is not overtly Satanic, but there are plenty of bands which are. Such as Golgoroth, with lead noise maker Gaahl, a man accused, convicted and imprisoned for torture and drinking the blood of his victim, and Watain, which features music which sounds like a dump truck run in reverse, vomiting its contents on the street. But these and those like them, given their explicit praise of Satan, are on the edges of society and sought after by only a few.

It is the mainstreaming, the normalizing of Satanic imagery which is of interest. This is occurring not only in music, but in all areas of entertainment (as we have seen before), and even in fashion. This includes perfume.

Doesn’t Smell So Good

A well known fragrance company created an advertisement for its new Kenzo World line. The commercial was so appealing that it was written about (among other places) on Britain’s The Guardian.

The video opens with a pretty girl bored by some hotel banquet. She slips out of a ballroom and, suddenly, set to horrid music, an unwanted change comes upon her. Is she being possessed? Is she suffering the after effects of a mind control program? Whichever: she is overcome. She dances spasmodically, she is overtly sexual, she causally and even proudly snaps the neck of an innocent man chatting on his cell phone.

At one point she tries to recover her true self, but whatever is inside wins the battle. And at the end, she flies into a giant all-seeing eye which has appeared from nowhere. The perfume bottle is the last thing we see, which also takes the form of the all-seeing eye.

Conspiracies and Theories

The all-seeing eye, in occult lore, is said to be Masonic and Illuminati imagery; indeed, that which is taken to be of the Illuminati is rife in the entertainment world. Put away the tinfoil hats, dear reader. I said “that which is taken to be,” and I did not say “that which is.” There is a world of difference here.

What is plain is that occult symbols, whether based in reality or only imagined, are showing with greater frequency. These are a mixture of the Satanic, of tokens from secret societies like the Illuminati, and of mind-control programs, all of which are mixed together in some black soup, and which are most popular in the music industry.

Mind control? Certainly. There was, dear reader, a genuine conspiracy, and not a theory, centered around our beneficent government’s MKUltra program, which ran experiments on unwitting Americans testing various mind-control techniques, mostly using drugs and forms of torture.

In 1979, ABC News’s Closeup devoted a program to exposing the CIA’s involvement. In 1973, then CIA Director Richard Helms, fearing discovery, ordered MKUltra files destroyed. For that and for other cover ups, Helms was convicted for misleading Congress.

The CIA said it abandoned MKUltra after claiming that the techniques it discovered were unreliable. Not that they didn’t work, but that they were unreliable, another notable difference. Given the history and natural distrust of our government, it is thus no wonder that many believe the program, or ones like it, are still in existence. Many are convinced — again, it doesn’t matter whether this is real or not — that something called Monarch programming exists. It is always accompanied by butterfly imagery and is said to be MKUltra perfected. See also the recent movie American Ultra.

The Plan Comes Together

If one wanted to characterize the dark framework around which Hollywood and the rest of the ephemeral industry is coalescing, not necessarily by design, but by merely copying what is popular, it is this. The Illuminati, a secret Satanic organization, uses mind control techniques on the innocent, especially children, because of the pain it causes them, and women, for sexual purposes. The aftereffects of mind control is the theme behind Katy Perry’s Wide Awake (notice the butterflies and her imaginary young, innocent self).

If one wants to become a success, one must be initiated into the occult world. This video by The Weekend, the first of a trilogy (part two, three), tells us the (necessary) deal made with the Devil is irrevocable.

I emphasize that this is the story they are telling, and am making no claims whatsoever about its veracity.

But with that story in mind, the Kenzo World video suddenly starts to make sense. At its start, the woman is sitting next to our doomed heroine. Look at her necklace. When the girl in green licks the statue, notice her bracelet. These symbols are not there by accident.

Now re-watch LA Devotee, if you can. The boy, who is, as some might have recognized, the same boy who is kidnapped by underworldly forces in Netflix’s Stranger Things, is being tortured for the viewing pleasure of others. And just like in Stranger Things, mind control is intimated.

Conclusion?

The examples given in this article can be multiplied with ease. If anything, the pace of using dark imagery by the ephemeral industry is accelerating. Doubtless like all fads, it will fade in time.

We haven’t reached the peak yet. So far, nobody is complaining; instead, there is every indication people are enjoying what they’re seeing.

But you have to wonder what the public reaction would be to a Satanic ritual, or an episode of torture, performed at the 2017 Super Bowl were Panic! at the Disco elected to host the half time show. A few years ago, such a suggestion would have seemed crazy. But given current trends, it’s not out of the question. (For more from the author of “Satanism, Child Torture, Mind Control — What Is on Hollywood’s Mind?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Hillary Supports Abortion ‘at 9 Months’: Trump Doubles Down in New Interview

In a new interview, Donald Trump doubled down on his criticism of Hillary Clinton for supporting late-term abortion.

“According to the rules of Hillary, you can take the baby at nine months and you can imagine what you have to do to that baby to get it out,” he told CBN. “And you can take that baby at nine months and you can abort. And a day prior to birth you can take the baby. And I said it’s unacceptable.”

During the first few minutes of last week’s third and final presidential debate, Trump went on the offense against Clinton for supporting abortion on demand and voting in favor of partial-birth abortion.

“If you go with what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month, you can take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby,” he said. “Now, you can say that that’s okay, and Hillary can say that that’s okay, but it’s not okay with me because based on what she’s saying and based on where she’s going and where she’s been, you can take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb in the ninth month on the final day, and that’s not acceptable.” (Read more from “Hillary Supports Abortion ‘at 9 Months’: Trump Doubles Down in New Interview” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Sadie Robertson Shares Her Thoughts on Trump in Light of Recent Scandals

Despite the release of a sexually explicit audio recording and several subsequent sexual assault allegations, one of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s youngest female supporters recently revealed she still supports the embattled billionaire.

Reality television personality Sadie Robertson shared her take on the contentious election cycle when a reporter for The Huntsville (Ala.) Times asked if she continued to stand by the endorsement she made in August.

“That’s a good question,” the Duck Dynasty star said. “I would say yes, I would be voting for Trump.”

Robertson went on to explain that her support for the real-estate developer does not mean she supports his behavior.

“It doesn’t mean that I agree with everything he says or that he’s a moral person,” she said, “but in the end it comes down to two people.”

The 19-year-old, who was the runner-up in Season 19 of Dancing with the Stars, is not the only member of her famous family to publicly back Trump.

Her father, Willie Robertson, supported Trump during the primary. Family patriarch Phil Robertson endorsed the former reality television host after his first choice, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, suspended his campaign.

“For me and my family,” Sadie Robertson said, “we agree with what Trump wants to do with America.”

She went on to describe the unique opportunity she has as a celebrity to influence others as a responsibility she does not take lightly.

“It’s a huge honor, honestly,” she said, adding she is thankful her position allows her to share her Christian faith with a wide audience.

“When people have told me I’m a role model,” Robertson explained, “it makes me excited, because I’m going to share the good news.”

While Trump’s current controversies cost him some support among women, Robertson is hardly the only prominent female to continue openly endorsing the GOP nominee.

Patricia Smith, whose son was among the four Americans killed in the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, is one such supporter. She is expected to be one of Trump’s guests in the audience for the final presidential debate on Wednesday. (For more from the author of “Sadie Robertson Shares Her Thoughts on Trump in Light of Recent Scandals” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

‘That Cop Who Died Today’ – This St. Louis Cop’s Gut-Wrenching Words Will Shatter You Heart

St. Louis police officer Don Re has a blog on which he’s become known for his emotional and poignant writing.

Last year, his post on the “senseless” death of a child went viral. His website, “Don of all trades,” addresses issues like stop and frisk, to the relationship between police and the minority communities they serve, to personal stories about his life and family.

His most recent post offers thoughts on the death of a St. Louis-area police officer.

St. Louis County is mourning the loss of 33-year-old Officer Blake Snyder, who was killed early Thursday morning responding to a disturbance call in Green Park. Eighteen-year-old Trenton Forster has been charged with murder and armed criminal action for the shooting. Forster was critically injured by return fire from a backup officer, but is expected to survive.

Snyder leaves behind a wife, Elizabeth, and 2-year-old son. Officer Re posted some thoughts on the tragedy, and the challenges that face all police officers is worth everyone’s time to read.

Officers Re’s powerful blog entry, “That cop who died today,” is republished with permission below:

My coworker walked into my office and I told him, only half-jokingly, that if one more person pissed me off this morning, I was probably going to snap.

Some of the recruits had been pushing my buttons with their repeated mistakes and lack of attention to detail.

I was in a foul mood.

“You’re not going to like this then,” he continued.

“The cop shot this morning died.”

Just like it has for eighteen years now, those words hit me like an unexpected punch in the gut.

I knew about the shooting, but assumed or hoped that he would be okay.

Surely he’d recover with time, just like many other people who get shot do.

Nope.

Another police officer is dead.

A young man with a lot of life ahead of him is dead.

A young father is dead.

A young wife is a widow. She may spend days or weeks or months hoping it’s not true and that her young husband will be home soon.

A two year old will never toddle into his biological dad’s arms again or ever draw pictures of a police man and hand it to his daddy with pride.

“The cop shot this morning died.”

How many times can one hear those or similar words and still go on working as a police officer in spite of it?

Shortly after I heard the news, my own wife texted an emoji to my phone. It was the one where the face is blowing a heart shaped kiss.

Without words, I knew she knew, and that she was thinking about me. She was concerned for me and for her own kids.

We don’t have time for cops to be killed right now. We already have to rearrange our lives to accommodate the circus that is the second presidential debate in St. Louis, and now we have to prepare to bury a fellow officer.

Either event alone is difficult; their simultaneous occurrence is a mess.

Still, we will do it.

We will take care of these events because we must. Somebody has to.

County officers will work the debate alongside us City officers.

We will stand tall with black mourning bands on our badges, thinking about our lost comrade and our own determination to continue on with this fucking job. We will do it right in the face of people who hate Trump or Hillary or cops or just everything in general and who will take that hate out on the front line officers.

We’re easy targets.

We’re easy scapegoats for a system that many people don’t trust or like or respect anymore.

Hate that your taxes are too high?

Hate email scandals?

Hate billionaires who are going to build walls and deport immigrants?

Take it out on the police officers.

You’ll never get close enough to the people who truly cause your life misery, but we’re right here.

Spit in our faces.

Call our black officers vulgar, disgusting names.

Tell female officers you want to meet them off-duty and rape them.

Tell us you want us dead or that you’ll find us and do harm to our families.

This is what officers have to listen to during protests. Every time.

Pretend that we don’t hate email scandals or corrupt billionaires or have to pay taxes or face the same problems as every other schmuck does once we get home from work.

Pretend we’re not unique individuals who share your concerns and hopes for a better future.

We’ll be there for you anyway.

We’ll have our days off cancelled and our shifts lengthened so that everybody can enjoy their debate related shenanigans.

We do it so you can enjoy parades and fairs and professional sports events too.

It’s tiring sometimes, but we do it.

We do it even when we’re deflated by news that a local cop has died.

That somebody who was doing what you do every day has been murdered.

The silver lining is that I’m no longer angry and on the cusp of snapping.

Priorities.

I’m alive and my recruits are alive.

We’ll use this as a learning tool. Mistakes and lack of attention to detail when you’re out of the Academy can get you killed.

They need to know that.

They need to get that through their skulls.

My kids can still draw me pictures of police officers and hand them to me with pride.

My wife can still expect me to come home after a long shift.

My dogs will bark at me when I do come home, and I will be annoyed at them, but less so.

I’m thankful to have my health and my life.

My problems are irrelevant right now, because I wasn’t that cop who died today.

Visit Officer Re’s blog to read the amazing comments of support and camaraderie.

Our law enforcement officers risk their lives every day in service of people who don’t always know or understand (let alone appreciate) why they do what they do.

Police are people. They are important. They matter.

And they need our support.

Thank a police officer today. He/she might die for you. (For more from the author of “‘That Cop Who Died Today’ – This St. Louis Cop’s Gut-Wrenching Words Will Shatter You Heart” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Secret Recording Shows Bill Clinton Admitting He Wishes He Slept With More Women

A secretly recorded phone conversation from 1991 between former President Bill Clinton with his alleged former mistress Gennifer Flowers has been newly released to author and radio host, Aaron Klein.

The conversation took place two months after Clinton had announced his bid for the presidency. Flowers claims she was no longer romantically involved with Clinton at the time of their conversation and was dating another man.

In the conversation, Clinton discussed various women with which he had been accused of engaging in extramarital affairs.

Flowers: I talked to David Watkins. I have a little company with a guy named (name redacted) and (name redacted) called Concepts Plus, that does jingles…

Clinton: Yeah. Beautiful (name redacted).

Flowers: Yes, beautiful.

Clinton: The one I allegedly had an affair with?

Flowers: B.B., (name redacted), uh, anyway. Beautiful (name redacted)…anyway…

Clinton: The only time I ever saw her was at the inaugural. She was so good looking I wished it was true.

Flowers told Breitbart News how she felt during her conversation with Clinton.

“Because, you know, it wasn’t gross locker talk, but it was just kind of that tone. And it was irritating me because but not because it was making me jealous. It was just irritating me that he was doing it. Being disrespectful to her because, you know, she was a great person.”

At one point, Clinton joked that he once told Bill Simmons he wished he had slept with all the women that were mentioned.

Clinton: Bill Simmons read me the list. I said, “God, Bill, I kinda hate to deny that.”

Flowers: You know what I said? I said, “At least he’s an equal opportunity f—er!” (laughter)

Clinton: I’ve got good taste.

Flowers had already made parts of her recorded tape public back in the 1990s. She claimed she had a 12-year affair with the former president and told Klein Friday that her “heart sunk” when she realized that Clinton was going to stay married after she had already become pregnant with his baby.

Flowers claimed that Clinton personally paid her $200 to get an abortion, and described the process to Klein as “not only physically painful but it was very psychologically painful.”

“Understand that when these tapes were made from the very beginning Bill and I were no longer seeing each other,” Flowers told Breitbart. “And I felt like several times in those tapes he was trying to make me jealous because he was talking about other women. About being beautiful. And I clearly felt that he was trying to make me jealous. Because he had let me know that if I change my mind he was there.”

Flowers also commented on the section of the tape in which Clinton stated “I’ve got good taste,” which was his response to the list of five alleged mistresses.

“Well, if I hadn’t been recording him, I would have told him that he was a jackass,” she said. “That he could quit talking like that. You know, at that point, I didn’t want to make myself look bad, but had I been able to really talk freely, I would have said, ‘you can knock that off. It’s not funny.’”

In an exclusive interview with the Daily Mail in 2013, Flowers said she believed that she and Clinton would still be together today, were it not the birth of his daughter, Chelsea.

“We have some unresolved issues that it would be nice to sit down and talk about now. He was the love of my life and I was the love of his life and you don’t get over those things,” she said then.

The topic of infidelity has been a reoccurring theme during this general election. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has accused Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton of being an “enabler” during his slew of sexual crimes and infidelities.

In an interview with Fox News Channel’s Ainsley Earhardt on Monday, Melania Trump claimed that bringing up Clinton’s past affairs was reasonable because they have done it to her.

“So they — they’re asking for it?” Earhardt asked.

“They’re asking for it. They started,” she said. “They started from the — from the beginning of the campaign putting my — my picture from modeling days. That was my modeling days, and I’m proud what I did. I worked very hard.”

Several racy photos of Trump’s modeling days have been used as smear campaigns throughout the election. In March and July, photos of her nude where used in both newspapers and anti-Trump advertisements.

The Clintons appeared in January 1992 on 60 Minutes, where the former president denied a relationship with Flowers. He later admitted to one sexual encounter with Flowers in a 1998 deposition for the Paula Jones lawsuit — another woman he was accused of sexually harassing. (For more from the author of “Secret Recording Shows Bill Clinton Admitting He Wishes He Slept With More Women” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

How Does the Church Reach Millennials? Hint: It’s Not Flashing Lights or Rock Band Worship

Don’t lie to a Millennial. They will smell it a mile away.

At least that’s what the latest research from Barna and the Cornerstone Knowledge Network shows in a detailed report called “Making Space for Millennials.” The study explored key characteristics of people from 18-30 years old and discussed how churches can make room for their ideas and influence.

Millennials are leaving the church in large numbers: 70 percent of those raised in the church leave by the time they are in their 20s; one-third of those under 30 in the United States claim to have “no religion.” As more and more Millennials leave the church, ministry leaders are asking “why?” and “what can we do about it?”

Here’s what Millennials really want in a church.

Millennials Can Handle the Truth

Millennials want authenticity — a genuine Christianity and a legitimate worship experience. Taylor Snodgrass of the Church & Its 20-somethings has pointed out that if churches are not authentic, Millennials will leave. “Our generation has been advertised at our whole life, and even now on social media. Consequently, when a company isn’t being authentic with their story we can easily see through this. If the church isn’t giving you the whole story, if it’s sugarcoated and they’re trying to put on an act on stage, people in their 20s will see through this. This causes us to leave. We’re good at seeing when people are lying to us.”

Millennials are “not disillusioned with tradition; they are frustrated with slick or shallow expressions of religion,” says David Kinnaman, president of the Barna Group and author of You Lost Me: Why Young Christians Are Leaving Church…and Rethinking Faith. Millennials are tired of big box churches marketing entertainment to them rather than following Jesus. They want an authentic Christianity.

“Millennials are not looking for perfect people,” says Frank Powell. “Jesus already handled that. Millennials are looking for people to be real and honest about struggles and temptations.”

Part of being an authentic Christian and living authentically is digging deeper — becoming the mature Christian who eats meat rather than drinks milk as described in Hebrews 5:12-14. And Millennials want that. Snodgrass says that Millennials want to be challenged to think about real-world issues. “We don’t just want to have easy topics each week. We want to dive into difficult-to-understand topics and passages and explore how they apply.”

Kayla Rush and Kyle Smith, authors of “What Millennials Need from the Church,” say that few have bothered to ask Millennials why they’re leaving the church, but being intellectually bored is part of the problem. “In our youth groups we were taught — exhorted, in fact — to want to go deeper, and we’re not getting that from grown-up church,” they said, adding that while churches seem to have a fear of questioning, “questioning is at the heart of education: it leads us into deeper knowledge, not unbelief. We need intellectual engagement.”

Give Me the Real Jesus

Drew Dyck, in his blog article “Millennials Need a Bigger God, Not a Hipper Pastor,” addresses the concerns over why many Millennials are disinterested in church:

Millennials have a dim view of church. They are highly skeptical of religion. Yet they are still thirsty for transcendence. But when we portray God as a cosmic buddy, we lose them (they have enough friends). When we tell them that God will give them a better marriage and family, it’s white noise (they’re delaying marriage and kids or forgoing them altogether). When we tell them they’re special, we’re merely echoing what educators, coaches, and parents have told them their whole lives. But when we present a ravishing vision of a loving and holy God, it just might get their attention and capture their hearts as well (Emphasis added).

Millennials need to experience the life-changing love of God through other people — and be able to give it as well. According to Powell, Millennials are optimistic about the culture because this is the “model of Jesus.” “He loves all types of people, does ministry in the city, and engages the culture,” said Powell. “To reach people today, the church must be immersed in the community for the glory of God.”

Connecting With God in the Worship Space — Keep it Simple

For Millennials, the worship experience begins at the door. Millennials want to know where to go and what is expected of them right away. “Visual clarity is huge,” said Snodgrass. “We walked into a few churches that didn’t have good signage, and we just wandered around. We weren’t sure where to go — and Millennials don’t want to ask. We just want to go in and experience the space without having to ask someone, especially if it’s our first time at church … the biggest thing is to create a welcoming space that isn’t confusing.”

While the research indicated that Millennials tend to want more traditional services, they want a space where they can feel comfortable — like Door of Hope in Portland, Oregon, said Snodgrass. Housed in an old church building without signage and just a stairway up to the sanctuary, the worship area held “rag-tag bunch of chairs set up everywhere and a drum set that had never been used, and people walking around with coffee. There were no pews.”

Research suggests that Millennials prefer more utilitarian spaces with landscape features. Nature helps Millennials connect with God, they said, and they also want a place to rest, rather than a church full of activities. “Our culture is highly fragmented and frenetic, and there are few places to take a breather and gain much-needed perspective,” Kinnaman said. “Ironically, most churches offer what they think people want: more to do, more to see. Yet that’s exactly the opposite of what many young adults crave when it comes to sacred space.”

According to Aspen Group architect Derek DeGroot, church architects are still exploring what a church built for non-activity would look like. Although busy church activities are meant to bring people to God and others, DeGroot said that “church buildings still need to be a place where people can experience Jesus’ invitation: ‘Come unto me, all ye who are weary and heavy laden, and I will give you rest.’”

Some churches with younger parishioners have scrapped activities altogether. Pastor Tony Ranvestel at Clear River Church has a congregation largely composed of Millennials. “We call people to follow Jesus; that’s our primary activity,” Ranvestel said. “If you follow Jesus, this leads to serving and justice.” This method seems to be just what Millennials want: a simple, clear, authentic Christian message with no frills. Clear River Church is “unapologetically a place of worship, learning and experiencing community,” and Millennials there have found that it’s a different kind of place than they’ve found anywhere else.

One-on-One Relationships

Millennials crave relationships within the church. They do not want to be just a number. They don’t want to slip in after the music and out before the closing prayer. Millennials want a more individualized approach — and some churches are beginning to do just that. According to pastor and Christianity Today writer Karl Vaters, “By forcing us out of a group approach to church and into a more individualized way of seeing people, Millennials may be poised to bring about the biggest shift in the way churches do ministry since the Reformation.” The relational component of church, said Vaters, is more relevant than any program, method or musical style. The number one way to reach Millennials, he said, is through the church-as-relational-community model: love God and love others.

Ranvestel said Millennials are trying to figure out the purpose of their life. “We present this and try to show them the goodness of God, the goodness of being in community,” he said, “We’re heavy on person-to-person discipleship and believe this happens best in relationships,” adding that he talks to young people about how God’s principles apply to everyday situations.

The way to create a sense of community for Millennials is acknowledging them, greeting them, learning (and using) their names, and engaging them in conversations.

“[W]e’re raising a generation that’s rich in material goods, but poor in relationships,” said Vaters. “That’s the need we should be finding and fulfilling.”

Closing the Generation Gap: Guidance Through Mentorship

Unlike Generation X before them, Millennials want to make connections with and learn from older adults. Boomers (and Gen-Xers) used to say, “Don’t trust anyone over 30!” Vaters says that simply isn’t the case with Millennials. “[T]his generation is hungry for connection with the wisdom and friendship of previous generations.” Barna’s research indicated that young people who have an older mentor from their faith community are 59 percent more likely to stay in church than those who do not.

Founding partner of Cornerstone Knowledge Network Ed Bahler said that “Mentoring and discipling this next generation is everything,” especially if we wish to equip Millennials to lead the church in the coming years.

But it isn’t a one-way street. The church should be open to “reverse mentoring,” said Kinnaman. This means asking Millennials to share knowledge about how to “navigate life in this digital age,” and reciprocal sharing between generations. According to Bahler, “Ultimately,” the future of the church “rests on our ability to connect the generations.”

Millennial Role Play

Just as Millennials don’t want to take the back seat in church, they don’t want to take a back seat in participation, either. Vaters said the churches that are successfully reaching current generations are “doing ministry with active participants.” Millennials want to have a seat at the table and be involved in meaningful discussions. Shawn Williams, pastor at Community Christian Church-Yellow Box said Millennials want a role to play. “They don’t want to sit on the sidelines and observe. If they’re going to be part of a church, it must have value and meaning … If it doesn’t provide meaning and value to them, they won’t participate. They’ll go and find something that does have meaning and value.”

Millennials want to be taken seriously — and given real responsibility. Ed Cyzewski, in his article “‘How Do We Get Millennials to Attend Church?’ Why that is the wrong question,” said if church leaders don’t have Millennials’ input, they cannot know why they are leaving church. “We all have different suspicions about why millennials don’t find church relevant or don’t want to attend church. Some may say it’s because of Bible teaching or cultural compromise … Our suspicions and isolated observations mean very little in the grand scheme of things if young adults don’t have a respected place at the table as full members and leaders in training with voices that are valued and considered.”

Rush and Smith said that church leadership is dominated by their parents’ and grandparents’ generations — so they don’t have a voice in the church. “[Y]outh groups … give teenagers a voice. They speak their minds, they state their preferences, and they are heard. When we graduate and head out into the big bad world of grown-up church, this changes … we no longer have a pastor whose primary job is to listen to our needs and concerns as young people and respond. We have good ideas … but no one seems to care. … So we’re back to square one, having to work our way up through the ranks in hopes of maybe one day having our voices heard and being able to change the status quo … We need to be taken seriously.”

What Now?

It would seem that all of the effort put into large, elaborate, flashy and overdone churches has been all for naught. Millennials are the hippies of the Christian movement: they want simple and honest Christianity in a utilitarian but natural space where they can rest and connect with a very real and authentic God; they crave relationships and connections with older adults, drawing from their wisdom and insight; and they want a participatory experience where they have a seat at the table in shaping the church of the future — their church.

As Powell said, “Millennials want to go far and want their life to have meaning. In their minds this is not possible without deep, authentic, Christ-centered community.” Millennials can be encouraged to come back to church as ministry leaders seek to understand generational differences and what is meaningful to this demographic; not as a group of people, but as individuals; not as a person who warms a pew, but a person who warms a heart through a real relationship. (For more from the author of “How Does the Church Reach Millennials? Hint: It’s Not Flashing Lights or Rock Band Worship” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Cardinal Dolan: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Prayed Together Before Al Smith Dinner

With all of the political barbs thrown in each other’s direction lately, one would think it would take miracle for someone to convince Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton to take a quiet moment and pray together. Thursday night before the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Dinner the miraculous happened. Cardinal Timothy Dolan, who suggested the prayer and sat between the two presidential nominees during the evening, recounted the “touching” moment Friday on NBC’s Today show.

“When we were going in, I said ‘Could we pray together?’ as we were waiting to be announced,” said Cardinal Dolan, “and after the little prayer, Mr. Trump turned to Secretary Clinton and said ‘You know, you are one tough and talented woman. This has been a good experience in this whole campaign as tough as it’s been.’ And she said to him, ‘And Donald, whatever happens, we need to work together afterwards.’” Cardinal Dolan said he thought that was the evening at its best.

According to Cardinal Dolan, the Al Smith Dinner is traditionally an evening of “unity and friendship and joy.” However, this time around, he said, it was like a family dinner “where you’re just hoping that everything goes well … and in general, alleluia, the evening went very well!” Cardinal Dolan was touched by the obvious attempt by both Clinton and Trump to be courteous and get along. “I was very moved by that.”

Although there was clearly some awkwardness and iciness between Clinton and Trump, Cardinal Dolan said that’s nothing new, describing the chill four years ago between Obama and Romney. Breaking some of that ice is a goal of the dinner, Cardinal Dolan explained, and “thanks be to God it worked!”

The private amity between Trump and Clinton wasn’t as present during the prepared speeches. Cardinal Dolan acknowledged that there were some tense moments and some boos from the audience. He attributes that to the break in the Al Smith Dinner tradition of self-deprecating humor.

John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan “brought the house down,” Cardinal Dolan said, because they were the butt of their own jokes. Last night, Trump and Clinton made each other the butt of their jokes. “The characteristic of the evening is self-deprecating, humble humor,”said Cardinal Dolan, but that goal is tougher to achieve nowadays, as evidenced by Thursday night’s dinner.

But for one moment they played nice, and they prayed. (For more from the author of “Why Is Every Political Party and Independents, Terrified of Clinton and the People Around Her?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Voters to Decide Legality of Physician-Assisted Suicide in Colorado

Colorado could become the sixth state to make physician-assisted suicide legal when voters go the polls next month.

Called Proposition 106, the ballot question in Colorado would allow a “terminally ill individual” to request and self-administer “aid-in-dying medication” as a way to end his or her life voluntarily. Whoever seeks assisted suicide would have to have a prognosis to live six months or less.

Jeff Hunt, director of the Centennial Institute, a conservative think tank affiliated with Colorado Christian University, is leading the fight against the ballot initiative.

A Colorado-based group called Compassion & Choices “has been trying to push this measure through for the past two years,” Hunt said in a phone interview with The Daily Signal. “This measure has failed because it has faced opposition from both Democrats and Republicans who realize that it is bad for the state of Colorado.”

Compassion & Choices describes itself as an organization that campaigns for expanding “end-of-life options,” including what some call the right to die.

“For most people with a terminal illness, hospice and palliative care are the right fit,” Holly Armstrong, spokeswoman for the campaign in Colorado, said in a statement to The Daily Signal, adding:

But sometimes even the best care cannot relieve pain and suffering. People in that situation should have a range of options for treatment.

Physician-assisted suicide is legal in California, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, and Montana.

While many see it as a way to end suffering, Hunt told The Daily Signal, the implications of the practice go much further.

“Doctor-assisted suicide is sold as a personal decision to end suffering at the end of a person’s life,” he said. “Those pushing for its legalization say that it allows a terminally ill patient in his or her very last days to part with loved ones in peace.”

If passed, the initiative would amend Colorado law to allow physician-assisted suicide.

What supporters of Proposition 106 are not saying, Hunt said, is that, if passed, the measure would affect many more people than those who request the procedure. He said:

In Oregon and Washington state, where physician-assisted suicide is already legal, individuals with terminal illnesses are getting letters from their insurance companies that are saying, ‘Your medication is too expensive for us to continue your coverage. However, we will pay the $100 for you to terminate your life through doctor-assisted suicide.’

In the states where physician-assisted suicide is already legal, Hunt said, the medical and insurance communities are restricting the choice to live. This should not be the case at all, he said, due to the advanced nature of hospice care today.

“The hospice community has come a long way in providing great hospice care for those who are in their very last stages in life. Walking down this path of legalization of doctor-assisted suicide is dangerous for Colorado,” he said.

Hunt said Proposition 106 also singles out the disabled.

“Organizations who advocate for the disabled are especially against the measure because the disabled community is especially targeted by this measure,” he said.

Hunt also noted a lack of oversight, saying:

With doctor-assisted suicide, there is no oversight or review from an outside party. The only oversight or review that occurs is from the doctor who is administering the death.

Hunt cited a 2005 statement from Dr. Katrina Hedberg, state epidemiologist and health officer in the Oregon Public Health Division, saying his concerns echo hers: “We are not given the resources to investigate [assisted-suicide cases] and not only do we not have the resources to do it, but we do not have any legal authority to insert ourselves.”

Melody Wood, a research assistant in the DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society at The Heritage Foundation, said legalization is ripe for abuse.

“Physician-assisted suicide is bad policy that corrupts the practice of medicine,” Wood said. “Assisted suicide laws lead to the marginalization of the weak and persons with disabilities, and can easily be abused. Those nearing the end of their lives should be treated with true compassion and appropriate care, not told that they would be better off dead.”

Hunt said Colorado’s younger population tends to be more favorable toward legalizing physician-assisted suicide, while older residents increasingly are against it.

“If young people are already pro-life, they are very much opposed to this bill,” he said. “General polling shows that the younger population is more supportive of it. However, the older they get, the more people oppose it, because they see the implications it will have on the state of Colorado.”

Hunt said the state’s churches and other religious organizations are sharing their positions on Proposition 106.

“The faith community is working together to educate their respective churches on this issue,” he said. “The Catholic Church is aggressively doing outreach against the measure. The Denver Archdiocese has released three sermons on this proposition for pastors to use in educating their congregations about doctor-assisted suicide. The Mormon community and Eastern Orthodox community are also working against it.” (For more from the author of “Voters to Decide Legality of Physician-Assisted Suicide in Colorado” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.