Explosive Whistleblower Claim: Did Bill Barr and Fani Willis Plot to Derail Trump’s Comeback?

/0 Comments/in , , /by

A shocking whistleblower has come forward with explosive allegations suggesting former Attorney General Bill Barr and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis collaborated to undermine President Donald Trump’s political resurgence.

Patrícia Lélis, a former journalist who worked at Howard Stirk Holdings, shared handwritten notes, emails, and photos with Project Veritas outlining secret meetings between Barr and others from 2021 to 2023. According to Lélis, these discussions focused on legal strategies targeting Trump, his supporters, and key figures involved in the January 6 protests.

Lélis claims that on September 13, 2021, Barr revealed plans to focus investigations on Trump’s closest allies, including Steve Bannon, Rudy Giuliani, Enrique Tarrio, the Oath Keepers, and the Proud Boys. Further notes suggest Barr coordinated with DA Willis and special counsel Jack Smith on legal actions across Florida, Georgia, and New York.

A particularly damning note from February 27, 2023, alleges Barr advised Willis to pursue RICO charges against Trump—a notoriously difficult charge to defend. Indeed, in August 2023, Willis indicted Trump and 18 co-defendants on 41 counts, including Georgia’s RICO statute.

Lélis says she reported Barr’s conduct to the FBI but was later prosecuted by the Department of Justice. She has since been granted political asylum in a foreign country. Meanwhile, DOJ insiders reportedly worry about a potential cover-up and claim Barr has “put the entire FBI after this woman” to seize her documents.

Bill Barr currently serves as a distinguished fellow at the Hudson Institute and partner at the Torridon Group.

These allegations add fuel to the ongoing controversy surrounding legal actions against Trump, raising questions about political motivations behind high-profile prosecutions.

Photo credit: Flickr

Trump Reportedly Relocates Obama Portrait

/0 Comments/in , /by

President Donald Trump has reportedly moved the official White House portrait of Barack Obama to an area that is generally off-limits to visitors, according to a Sunday CNN report. The painting now hangs at the top of the Grand Staircase, alongside portraits of George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, making it far less visible to the public during White House tours.

This is the second relocation of Obama’s portrait under Trump’s direction. In April, it was moved to make room for a photograph depicting the immediate aftermath of the July 2024 assassination attempt on Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania.

The portrait’s latest move comes amid renewed scrutiny of the Obama administration’s handling of intelligence during the 2016 election. On July 18, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released documents and a memo accusing Obama’s national security team of “manufacturing and politicizing” intelligence in what she described as a “years-long coup” against Trump after his victory over Hillary Clinton.

Gabbard followed up days later by announcing she had referred Obama to the Justice Department for potential criminal charges related to the so-called “Russiagate” probe. She alleged that the former president played a central role in shaping the assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Trump—a claim heavily questioned in the years since.

Special Counsel John Durham’s May 2023 report concluded that the FBI failed to corroborate allegations from the discredited Steele Dossier, which was nonetheless used to obtain surveillance warrants against members of Trump’s campaign, including Carter Page. Former FBI analyst Brian Auten testified in 2022 that the bureau offered dossier author Christopher Steele $1 million to verify its contents, but Steele was unable to do so.

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

JD Vance Predicts Indictments Over Russia Hoax Allegations

/0 Comments/in , /by

Vice President JD Vance says criminal charges are likely for individuals involved in what he called the “Russiagate” scandal, claiming that senior officials from the Obama administration misled the public and abused intelligence processes to damage Donald Trump’s presidency.

Speaking with Sunday Morning Futures host Maria Bartiromo in an interview, Vance pointed to documents released last month by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Gabbard described the material — which includes memos and intelligence assessments — as evidence of a “years-long coup” to undermine Trump after his 2016 election victory over Hillary Clinton.

“Absolutely, Maria,” Vance said when asked if he wanted to see indictments. “You indict people because they broke the law. If you look at what Tulsi and [FBI Director] Kash Patel have revealed in the last couple of weeks, I don’t know how anyone can look at that and say there weren’t aggressive violations of the law.”

Vance alleged that officials “laundered” Clinton campaign talking points through the intelligence community, exaggerating information that fit a predetermined narrative while suppressing contradictory evidence.

The controversy stems from the now-discredited Steele Dossier, compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, which alleged ties between Trump’s campaign and Russia. Special Counsel John Durham’s 2023 report concluded the FBI “did not and could not corroborate” the dossier’s claims. FBI analyst Brian Auten testified in 2022 that the bureau offered Steele $1 million to substantiate his allegations — something Steele never did.

The dossier was nevertheless cited by multiple media outlets and used to obtain warrants to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. In 2022, the Federal Election Commission fined Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee for their role in funding the dossier.

“I absolutely think they broke the law,” Vance said. “It is sick and it’s disgusting. It hurt the intelligence community, it hurt the American people, and it hurt the first Trump Administration. We’ve got to have consequences for it.”

Vance argued that the intelligence community should be focused on protecting Americans from real threats, not engaging in political manipulation. “I want them catching bad guys, not laundering campaign talking points into the media and giving them an air of legitimacy,” he said.

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Trump and Putin to Meet in Alaska, Zelensky May Join Talks

/0 Comments/in , /by

Former President Donald Trump has confirmed that he will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, August 15, 2025. The announcement, made on Trump’s Truth Social account, described the event as a “highly anticipated meeting” and promised further details in the coming days.

While Trump stated the date and location were set, a senior White House official reportedly noted that the plans remain “fluid.” According to that official, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky may also become involved in the discussions.

The meeting comes amid ongoing efforts to address the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Moscow had earlier indicated that it expected Trump and Putin to meet in person to discuss the war, with top Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov confirming that a venue had been agreed upon.

This development follows U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff’s recent visit to Russia, where he met directly with Putin. Those talks were described as a “last-bid attempt” to secure peace in Ukraine, though little concrete progress has been reported so far.

Observers note that Trump’s tone on the conflict has shifted over time—from initial optimism about diplomatic solutions to clear frustration at the lack of movement from Moscow.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump remains “open to meeting with both President Putin and President Zelensky” if it could help advance peace negotiations. The Alaska summit, if it proceeds as planned, could mark one of the most high-profile diplomatic events of the year.

Maxwell’s DOJ Testimony Clears Trump, Fuels Speculation Over Controversial Pardon

/0 Comments/in , /by

Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted associate of Jeffrey Epstein, recently met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche for nine hours over two days in a Department of Justice interview. According to sources familiar with the exchange, Maxwell stated that former President Donald Trump had never engaged in any concerning conduct in her presence. This statement has fueled speculation that a presidential pardon for Maxwell may be under consideration — a possibility drawing outrage from victims’ advocates.

Details of the DOJ Interview

Timing & Duration: Maxwell’s interviews with Blanche occurred last month, totaling nine hours across two days.

Content: Sources say Maxwell made no statements damaging to Trump and specifically said she had never observed troubling behavior from him.

Documentation: There is both a transcript and an audio recording of the interview. The Trump administration is reportedly weighing whether to release the transcripts — and possibly the audio — to the public, potentially as soon as this week.

Initiation: Sources indicate Maxwell herself requested the meeting with DOJ officials.

Speculation on a Potential Pardon

While no official decision has been announced, President Trump has not ruled out pardoning Maxwell. The timing of her favorable comments about Trump has led to speculation that the interview could be a factor in such a decision.

Victims’ attorney Arick Fudali, who represents 11 Epstein survivors, condemned the idea of any leniency for Maxwell, calling it “revictimizing” for those she harmed. Fudali emphasized that Maxwell remains the only person convicted in connection with Epstein’s trafficking network and argued that she “belongs behind bars.”

Fudali and others argue that both political parties have failed Epstein’s victims for decades.
Key points from his statement include:

Survivors have been “wronged at every single step,” starting with what he described as an inadequate 1990s FBI investigation.

Epstein’s death in federal custody in 2019 robbed victims of their opportunity to see him face justice.

Continued public discussion of Epstein and Maxwell is retraumatizing for survivors.

Fudali also questioned whether talk of a pardon could be a way for Trump to avoid releasing sensitive Epstein-related files. Calls for transparency in the case have intensified, though the DOJ and FBI have previously stated they will not release additional evidence.

Maxwell’s recent interview with DOJ officials, her favorable comments regarding Trump, and the administration’s possible release of interview transcripts have combined to spark intense public and political debate. For survivors and their advocates, the possibility of a pardon represents not only a failure of justice but also a continuation of the harm inflicted by Epstein and his network.

Report: DOJ Appoints Prosecutor To Probe Adam Schiff, Letitia James Mortage Fraud Allegations

/0 Comments/in , /by

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has appointed a special prosecutor to investigate alleged mortgage fraud by Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James, several outlets reported Friday.

According to the New York Post, Bondi has tapped former acting U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. Ed Martin to spearhead “the prosecution of James and Schiff for potential mortgage fraud, bank fraud and wire fraud, which carry jail terms of up to 30 years.”

“Attorney General Bondi and President Trump have given me a very serious and mission,” Martin told the outlet. “For months DOJ and the FBI have been working on these two cases, it is my job to stick the landing.”

As The Federalist’s Beth Brelje previously reported, Schiff — a major Trump-Russia collusion hoaxer — was singled out by President Trump in a Truth Social post over allegations of mortgage fraud last month.

“Trump announced that Schiff had been investigated by Fannie Mae’s Financial Crimes division, which found Schiff may have committed mortgage fraud for more than a decade after he refinanced one of his homes — the one in Maryland, not the one in California,” Brelje wrote. “According to Trump, from 2009 to 2020, Schiff allegedly declared the Maryland home his primary residence ‘to get a cheaper mortgage and to rip off America.’” (Read more from “Report: DOJ Appoints Prosecutor To Probe Adam Schiff, Letitia James Mortage Fraud Allegations” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Bill Seeks Mandatory Labeling for Shelf-Life Coatings on Grocery Produce

/1 Comment/in , /by

A new bill in Congress aims to make it easier for Americans to know when the fruits and vegetables they buy have been treated with a plant-based coating designed to extend shelf life.

Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R–Ind.) introduced H.R. 4737, the Apeel Reveal Act, this week, targeting products like those made by California-based Apeel Sciences. The legislation would require clear labeling on produce treated with post-harvest coatings, such as Apeel’s Edipeel and Organipeel, before being sold in grocery stores.

“We should know what we’re eating – transparency is essential for making healthy choices,” Stutzman wrote on X. “My Apeel Reveal Act gives Americans the clarity they deserve when deciding what to feed themselves and their kids.”

Apeel says its coatings are made from naturally occurring ingredients — including plant-based mono- and diglycerides, baking soda, and citric acid — that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS). The company says its products comply with FDA Good Manufacturing Practices and are already identified by an Apeel logo or sticker in stores.

The bill defines a “covered product coating” as any substance applied directly to fresh produce to extend its shelf life. If passed, the measure would mandate uniform federal labeling, applying to all qualifying products regardless of brand.

While Apeel stresses that its coatings have undergone rigorous safety testing and have a long history of safe use, the legislation reflects growing calls in Congress for increased transparency in food labeling — giving shoppers more information before they take their groceries home.

Photo credit: Flickr

Trump Issues Ultimatum to Putin as Russian Drones Breach NATO Airspace; Putin Agrees to Meet in Alaska

/2 Comments/in , , /by

Eastern Europe is once again on edge as Russian drones—some armed with explosives—have breached NATO airspace, triggering security concerns and drawing a pointed warning from U.S. President Donald Trump. President Trump has demanded a resolution to the escalating tensions, giving Russian President Vladimir Putin until Friday to make “meaningful progress” in peace negotiations or face sweeping sanctions targeting Russia’s war economy.

The warning comes as NATO allies in Eastern Europe grow increasingly uneasy over a string of drone incursions and missile strikes brushing up against alliance borders.

In recent days, an explosive-laden drone believed to have originated from Belarus entered Lithuanian airspace, traveling over 100 kilometers before crashing inside a military training zone near the capital, Vilnius. The drone was carrying approximately two kilograms of explosives and came within one kilometer of the Lithuanian president’s residence.

Another drone incident occurred earlier in July, when an unidentified aircraft crashed near the Šumskas border crossing, prompting the evacuation of government officials. Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovilė Šakalienė called the latest breach “unprecedented and alarming,” urging NATO to take the situation seriously and increase regional air defense cooperation.

“This is not merely about Lithuanian airspace—this is NATO territory,” Šakalienė warned. “We need a collective response that reflects the seriousness of the threat.”

Meanwhile, a separate Russian missile strike hit a Ukrainian gas depot just half a mile from Romania’s border, again raising questions about NATO’s preparedness. Although Romania’s air force scrambled F‑16s to patrol the skies, no drone crossed into Romanian airspace during the incident—an outcome Romanian officials attribute to new legislation passed in May that allows for immediate interception or destruction of unauthorized drones.

Romania’s swift response stood in stark contrast to NATO’s broader posture, which has remained muted despite multiple airspace breaches over the past year.

Experts say the incidents reflect a shift in Russia’s military strategy—away from conventional warfare and toward so-called “hybrid” tactics that blend psychological warfare, cyberattacks, and ambiguous military provocations.

“This is the future battlefield,” said Eitvydas Bajarūnas, former Lithuanian ambassador. “It’s not about tanks rolling across borders, it’s about uncertainty, pressure, and the erosion of public confidence in security guarantees.”

Bruno Kahl, head of Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service, has repeatedly warned that Russia is testing the limits of NATO’s unity, using drone incursions and disinformation to gauge how the alliance might respond to more serious provocations. “Russia doesn’t believe NATO will act on Article 5 unless directly challenged,” Kahl said earlier this summer, referencing the alliance’s foundational principle of collective defense.

Amid growing anxiety in Europe, Donald Trump has taken a more confrontational approach. Speaking during an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Trump said Putin’s military adventurism was being fueled by high energy prices and vowed to collapse Russia’s oil-dependent economy if necessary.

“Putin will stop killing people if you get energy down another $10 a barrel,” Trump said. “He’s going to have no choice because his economy stinks.”

Trump warned that unless peace talks show tangible progress by the end of the week, he would push for aggressive sanctions targeting Russia’s energy sector—measures that could cut into the Kremlin’s ability to fund its ongoing war in Ukraine.

While Trump’s ultimatum may place renewed pressure on Moscow, some analysts worry it may also expose cracks in NATO’s deterrence strategy.

Andrew D’Anieri, a regional security expert with the Atlantic Council, noted that repeated incursions without any firm NATO response risk undermining the credibility of the alliance’s collective defense commitments.

“The concerning part is not just the drone flights,” D’Anieri said. “It’s the silence that follows.”

_____________________________________

Putin-Trump Meeting to Occur in Alaska on 8/15/25

By Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are scheduled to meet next week in Alaska to discuss an end to the three-year Russian war on Ukraine in the first in-person session between the two world leaders since Trump returned to the White House in January.

“The highly anticipated meeting between myself, as President of the United States of America, and President Vladimir Putin, of Russia, will take place next Friday, August 15, 2025, in the Great State of Alaska,” Trump wrote on Aug. 8 in a post on Truth Social. “Further details to follow. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

The announcement comes on the same day a Trump-imposed deadline on Putin to end the war in Ukraine expires. Talks have been floated for months and were initially supposed to include Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, with Trump facilitating the negotiations. (Read more from this story HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Trump Orders a New Census

/0 Comments/in , /by

President Donald Trump has directed the Commerce Department to conduct a new census, one that counts citizens of the United States and omits illegal aliens.

“I have instructed our Department of Commerce to immediately begin work on a new and highly accurate CENSUS based on modern day facts and figures and, importantly, using the results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024. People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump posted on Truth Social Thursday.

The 2020 Census was alarmingly inaccurate, resulting in faulty congressional representation in Washington D.C. From the Heritage Foundation:

In a shocking report that has not received the attention it deserves, the U.S. Census Bureau recently admitted that its 2020 Census count of the American population was incorrect in at least 14 states.

And those mistakes were costly to certain states in terms of congressional representation, number of electors, and money those states are likely to receive from the federal government during the next decade. To put the scope of these mistakes into perspective, contrast the errors in the Census Bureau’s latest recount (the 2020 Post-Enumeration Survey, or PES) with the recount from a decade ago (the 2010 Post-Enumeration Survey)—in which there was a net overcount of a mere 0.01 percent (36,000 people), a statistically insignificant error.

As explained below, as a result of these errors, Florida did not receive two additional congressional seats and Texas did not receive one more congressional seat. Meanwhile, two other states, Minnesota and Rhode Island, each retained a congressional seat that they should have lost, and Colorado gained a new seat to which it was rightfully not entitled.

(Read more from “Trump Orders a New Census” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Biden Skipped 2024 Super Bowl Interview Over Hur Report Concerns, Aide Confirms

/0 Comments/in , /by

A trusted adviser to President Biden has confirmed that the decision to skip last year’s Super Bowl interview was influenced by concerns over the fallout from Special Counsel Robert Hur’s investigation into Biden’s handling of classified material.

Anita Dunn, 67, a longtime Biden confidant and former senior communications adviser, testified before the House Oversight Committee that the president’s inner circle anticipated tough questioning tied to the then-unreleased Hur report. According to sources familiar with her remarks, Biden’s team believed media attention would center on the classified records controversy rather than his policy agenda.

“They thought the main coverage would be about what he did with classified records and not about the President’s policy decisions,” one source recounted from Dunn’s testimony, adding that the decision was made even before the report’s official release.

Released on February 5, 2024, Hur’s report concluded that Biden would likely appear to a jury as “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory” — language that ignited a heated national debate about his age and mental fitness. Biden’s legal team had reviewed the report on February 3 and 4, just days before the February 11 Super Bowl LVIII broadcast. News of his decision to decline the interview surfaced on February 3, marking the second consecutive year he had opted out.

The missed opportunity was notable — the annual Super Bowl interview offers presidents a rare, high-visibility platform to reach tens of millions of Americans, especially during an election year.

Dunn’s testimony also revealed that Biden’s top advisers discussed the possibility of a cognitive test but reached a consensus that it would yield “no political benefit.” While emphasizing that Biden was always the final decision-maker, she underscored that the choice not to pursue such testing was strategic rather than medically driven.

Despite these behind-the-scenes decisions, Dunn defended Biden’s engagement with the media. Citing research from Towson University’s Martha Joynt Kumar, she noted that over his presidency, Biden held 37 formal press conferences, participated in 151 interviews, and engaged in 679 informal gaggles with reporters — surpassing many of his predecessors since Ronald Reagan.

“I did not observe White House staff making key decisions or exercising the powers of the presidency without President Biden’s knowledge or consent,” Dunn testified.

Biden’s aides maintain that his avoidance of the Super Bowl interview was a calculated choice to prevent a political spectacle at a moment when the Hur report’s conclusions threatened to overshadow his policy messaging.