Supreme Court Makes Major Ruling on Border Wall Funds

The United States Supreme Court ruled on Friday that President Donald Trump can use $2.5 billion in military funding to build the border wall along the U.S. southern border.

USA Today reports that the Supreme Court’s “order temporarily settles just one of several skirmishes between the Trump administration and House Democrats, ‘blue’ states led by California, and environmental groups over border wall funds.” . . .

The Supreme Court’s ruling will allow the administration to build over 100 miles of Trump’s border wall along the U.S. southern border in Arizona, New Mexico, and California, which Bloomberg noted is Trump’s “biggest step yet toward erecting his long-promised wall.”

“The 30-foot steel bollard fencing will replace barriers that the Trump administration says are dilapidated and ineffective,” Bloomberg continued. “Some of those existing barriers are designed only to prevent vehicles from crossing and don’t stop pedestrians.” . . .

“The $2.5 billion had been shifted from various programs including personnel and recruiting, Minuteman III and air launch cruise missiles, E-3 aircraft upgrades and the Afghan security forces training fund,” CNN reported. “The Pentagon said it was able to move that money due to uncovered cost savings as part of a process known as ‘reprogramming.’ The money was moved into a Defense Department counter-drug account that is authorized to spend money on the construction of border barriers.” (Read more from “Supreme Court Makes Major Ruling on Border Wall Funds” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Not Terrorists? Gulf Cartel Threatens to Wipe out Mexican Town

The Gulf Cartel just threatened to wipe out a town in southern Mexico. Why should Americans care? That same cartel also controls Mexico’s northeast border with the U.S. and controls the busiest illegal alien smuggling routes into our country. They tie down Border Patrol and bring their assassins, financiers, drug runners, and general criminals over our border. They are every bit as terroristic as Islamic terrorist groups in the Middle East, and they’re in our own yard. Why won’t the State Department designate them as terrorists?

According to Borderland Beat, which monitors daily cartel activities, Gulf Cartel assassins entered the town of Asuncion Ixtaltepec in broad daylight with long guns to murder a resident on Wednesday. These types of assassinations happen every day. But lest people think this is limited to targeted cartel-on-cartel violence, the Gulf assassins left a “narco message” at the site of the assassination that read: “This is for El Burro, Pollito, and his people. And for all the town who covers for them. You will all die. Sincerely, Comandante Jaguar. CDG.”

This is the dictionary and statutory definition of terrorism that continues to be ignored by the State Department, which refuses to designate these cartels as such. These cartels seek to control territory through the use of terror! They are not simply crime syndicates that just want to earn money quietly.

The Mexican cartel culture is similar to the ideology of ISIS and al Qaeda in the sense that they seek “to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) or to effect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping,” which is the definition of international terrorism under 18 U.S.C. § 2331.

If anything, they now have more impact on our country than Islamic terrorists and certainly more than FARC, the Colombian drug cartel that is already designated by the State Department. Why is this administration not unleashing the Defense Department and the intelligence assets to be used against the cartels on both sides of our border?

Rather than lambast our government agencies for committing human rights violations against illegal aliens, Jaeson Jones, former captain in the Texas Department of Public Safety’s intel and counterterrorism division, believes we should be criticizing them for ignoring the human rights violations of the cartels, which affect both our security and the survival of the migrants.

“The weaponization of migration has masked a dark truth,” said the retired counter-cartel operative. “Massive human rights violations have been and are being committed in Mexico. All of the three-letter agencies of the United States government have become complicit for failing to do everything in their power to protect the American people and to secure our border. The State Department refuses to designate the Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs), and the FBI, DEA, and Department of Defense (DOD) refuse to support CBP and finally secure our border.”

Jones believes that these agencies are stuck in the past and just don’t have the stomach to reorient our threat assessments to focus on the border and the cartels as a national security issue. “I get it, it sucks that these agencies will have to change their current priorities, but good intel analysts don’t look at the evolving threat landscape the way they wish it was, they look at it for what it is and what most reasonable Americans believe. The threat to our southern border is substantial, and we must protect our country from the out-of-control violence plaguing Mexico and our nation.”

Jones noted how high-ranking Gulf leaders are living in the Rio Grande Valley – on our side of the border. “They often live lives of wealth and comfort and might pick their kids up from school on our side of the border before they travel back over to Tamaulipas and torture some people, then come right back over.”

Indeed, just last week, a Gulf Cartel leader was caught crossing over our border by Border Patrol in La Paloma, Texas, according to Breitbart Texas. How many more does Border Patrol miss because our political leaders prioritize care for illegals over national security, especially in these parts of the Rio Grande Valley where there is no border wall? Without a wall, the cartels use the bends in the river to easily cross undetected and disappear into the population because the populated towns are right on the border without any buffer of wall or desert.

Jones believes that designating the cartels as terrorists will open up many more investigative tools against those operators inside our country in addition to using DOD assets to combat them at the border itself.

This is happening all across our border, not just with the Gulf Cartel. Sinaloa, which is still the largest cartel, controls most of the territory on both sides of the Mexican border with California and Arizona. Last month, there was a Sinaloa shootout a half a block away from Arizona’s Cochise County. But that narco culture and all the violence that comes along with it is creeping into Arizona itself.

“Most Americans would be shocked to know how deeply entrenched the cartels are throughout this country,” warned Mark Lamb, sheriff of Pinal County, Arizona. “We fight against the cartels every day to uproot their scouts living in the mountains and to disrupt and dismantle their drug and human trafficking operations. Though we are 70 miles off the border, we are one of the last lines of defense, fighting to protect communities and families across this great country that will be negatively impacted, including the lives of those being exploited by the cartels.”

Even though Pinal County is not even on the border itself, Sheriff Lamb told me Sinaloa knows his county through and through and has a lot of operational control of the smuggling routes deep into U.S. territory.

Clearly, the root of the problem at the border is the national security problem of the actual people engaging in the smuggling of illegal immigrants. Were the State Department to finally designate the cartels and treat them the same way we would treat al Qaeda at our border, it would not only solve the security problem but would pre-empt the humanitarian problem.

This is exactly why Sergio Tinoco, a supervisor border agent in the Rio Grande Valley, believes that Border Patrol must be unshackled to actually deal with the mission at hand instead of serving as babysitters. “So long as we continue focusing solely on the needs of illegal immigrants and the humanitarian issue without dealing with the cartels and the security problem, we will continue playing into the hands of the cartels,” warned the exasperated agent on my podcast.

After holding numerous hearings about the needs and wants of illegal immigrants, Congress is on vacation until September. Meanwhile, agents like Tinoco are forced to deal with these brutal cartels alone, without backup, and with two hands tied behind their backs in 105-degree heat in dangerous territory. Decisions made in the air-conditioned halls of Congress and the State Department could change all of that. (For more from the author of “Not Terrorists? Gulf Cartel Threatens to Wipe out Mexican Town” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Yes, No, Maybe So? Will Dems Impeach? Who the Heck Knows?

Following Wednesday’s narrative-wrecking testimony from former special counsel Robert Mueller on Capitol Hill, Democrats are apparently divided on how — or whether — to proceed with efforts to impeach President Donald Trump. Friday’s mixed messages from top House Democrats only further confirm the division.

On Friday, just after Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., dismissed criticism for not moving fast enough on impeachment, one of her top committee chairs said his panel was already investigating it, in effect.

“I’m not trying to run out the clock” on formal impeachment procedures, Pelosi said in response to a reporter’s question. “Let’s get sophisticated about this okay? Okay? We will proceed when we have what we need to proceed. Not one day sooner.”

She also added that the activity of those on the Left who want her to move more quickly on impeachment action against the president “only gives me leverage.”

However, hours later, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., told reporters than an impeachment investigation was “in effect” under way already.

“I think too much has been made of the phrase ‘impeachment inquiry,’” Nadler told a reporter at a press conference about a committee lawsuit to obtain protected grand jury information from the Mueller report. “We are doing what our court filing said we are doing, what I said we are doing, and that is to say we are using our full Article I powers to investigate the conduct of the president and to consider, whether, what remedies there are.”

As to whether those remedies would include recommending articles of impeachment, Nadler said “we may not do that, we may do that, but that’s a conclusion at the end of the process.”

Later in the conference, when asked to clarify whether he was saying there is no difference between what he’s doing now and an impeachment inquiry, a visibly flustered Nadler answered, “In effect.”

Nadler added that there is “one difference” between a formal inquiry and what the committee has been doing, noting that a formal impeachment inquiry only considers impeachment, while the committee’s current activities will consider other actions as well.

“We are going to see what remedies we could recommend, including the possibility of articles of impeachment,” Nadler clarified. “We’re not limited to that.”

Meanwhile, another top House Democrat dismissed the viability of impeachment as an option for removing Trump from office on Thursday.

“We do need to be realistic, and that is, the only way he’s leaving office, at least at this point, is by being voted out, and I think our efforts need to be made in every respect to make sure we turn out our people,” House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said on CNN. “Should we put the country through an impeachment? I haven’t been convinced yet that we should, and going through that kind of momentous and disruptive experience for the country, I think, is not something we go into lightly.” (For more from the author of “Yes, No, Maybe So? Will Dems Impeach? Who the Heck Knows?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump: ‘This Was Treason’ — ‘This Should Never Be Allowed to Happen to Our Country Again’

By Breitbart. In an interview with Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity, his first since former special counsel Robert Mueller testified before the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees, President Donald Trump decried the Mueller “fake witch hunt.” . . .

“This should never happen to another president of the United States again,” Trump said on Thursday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “Hannity.” “This is an absolute catastrophe for our country. This was a fake witch hunt, and it should never be allowed to happen to another president again. This was treason. This was high crimes. This was everything as bad a definition as you want to come up with. This should never be allowed to happen to our country again.” (Read more from “Trump: ‘This Was Treason’ — ‘This Should Never Be Allowed to Happen to Our Country Again’” HERE)

______________________________________________________

Trump: Mueller Made Biden ‘Look Like a Dynamo’

By The Hill. President Trump took aim at former special counsel Robert Mueller and Joe Biden late Thursday, renewing his criticism of the former vice president’s age while suggesting that Mueller’s appearance before House lawmakers on Wednesday made Biden look like a “dynamo.”

“Sleepy Joe is okay, but he’s fading, I think he’s fading fast,” Trump said of Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign inan interview with Fox News’s Sean Hannity. “The only good thing about Mueller is that it made Joe Biden look like a dynamo.”

Trump’s remarks came in his first interview since Mueller appeared before the House Judiciary and House Intelligence Committees to testify on his more than 400-page report, which detailed his investigation into Russian election interference and possible obstruction of justice by Trump.

Mueller’s performance in his back-to-back hearings drew widespread criticism among those who questioned his grasp of his own investigation.

While many Democrats publicly praised his testimony before the House panels, some privately expressed a sense of disappointment in Mueller’s, at times, shaky performance. (Read more from “Trump: Mueller Made Biden ‘Look Like a Dynamo'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

CNN Editor Resigns After History of Antisemitism Resurfaces

An editor at CNN has resigned after a series of antisemitic comments he made resurfaced on Thursday.

CNN’s statement accepting the resignation of the editor makes clear the editor had worked at CNN for some time, and had made the antisemitic statements back in 2011. . .

[Warning: tweets contain explicit language]

(Read more from “CNN Editor Resigns After History of Antisemitism Resurfaces” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Anarchy: Protesters Help Stop ICE From Apprehending Criminal Alien

Over 10,000 Americans die every year in drunk driving accidents. Many of them are caused by foreign nationals who either should never have been in the country or who could have been previously deported for prior arrests. Now it appears that the position of anti-ICE activists and sanctuary city politicians is that they will work to thwart the deportation even of serial illegal alien drunk drivers who have been ordered deported by a judge.

On Tuesday, a group of anti-ICE protesters helped a criminal alien lock himself in a car with a 12-year-old boy being used as a human shield after they saw a group of ICE agents coming to apprehend him. The protesters enabled him to remain in the car for four hours in the Hermitage area of metro Nashville and then, after ICE agents had already decided to come back another day, engaged in a political stunt and surrounded the car with a human chain.

One protester who helped form the human chain around the car told the local ABC affiliate, “I could see if these people were bad criminals, but they’re not. They’re just trying to provide for their kids.”

There’s just one problem. The individual was indeed a criminal alien with a final deportation order who has remained an ICE fugitive for nearly a decade. An ICE official confirmed the man’s identity to CR so that CR could locate his criminal history.

The man who locked himself in the car is a 29-year-old Mexican national who has been arrested at least three times in Tennessee. According to Davidson County court records, he was arrested on March 22, 2010, for drunk driving and for driving without a license. He was sentenced to time served and a year of probation.

According to ICE, he was ordered deported by an immigration judge in 2010 but was offered voluntary departure on July 28 (which comes with less criminal offense if he were to re-enter illegally). He was given until November 26 to depart. Instead of taking the offer, he absconded and then was given a final order of deportation in absentia, making him a criminal fugitive.

Astoundingly, he was arrested again on August 31 of that year and was found guilty of misdemeanor identity fraud and driving without a license. Again, he was cycled in and out of the criminal justice system with a final order to leave the country, and yet local officials treated him as if he were an American.

The Mexican fugitive was once again arrested in Davidson County on May 1 of this year for driving on a revoked license with an open container of alcohol, which was also a violation of his probation. Then he was in court on July 2 for a hearing over his probation violation.

How was this man able to cycle in and out of jail and court and interact with state government without ever being turned over to ICE? This was all after a final order of deportation.

Yet local officials who were at the protest treat ICE agents as if they, not the illegal aliens, are the criminals. Nashville Metro Councilman Bob Mendes, who claimed to be on scene at the attempted apprehension, said in a statement, “There are reports I have heard that the ICE agents may have been telling the gentleman in the van that he had to give himself up or else MNPD would arrest him. If that’s what they said, that’s not true.”

Mendes went on to extol the policy of Nashville not to cooperate with ICE.

Mayor David Briley said ICE “stokes fear and distrust in our most vulnerable communities, which is why we do not use our local resources to enforce ICE orders.” He promised to work with local open-borders groups “to make sure residents know their rights and that support and resources are available for undocumented immigrants should the need arise.”

We have now reached the point where these sanctuaries are harboring, aiding, abetting, and shielding from detection those who violate our driving laws, drive drunk, and violate a deportation order for nine years. Those are all violations of 8 U.S. Code §1324. DHS and DOJ have been lax about prosecuting sanctuary officials for harboring illegal aliens.

What these local officials are essentially saying is that anyone is allowed to break into the country and nobody is allowed to be deported, even after they are arrested for subsequent crimes. For activists and local politicians to interfere with enforcement of sovereignty is the ultimate form of anarchy against American citizens.

Moreover, for illegal aliens to refuse to depart and then lock themselves in a car is itself a criminal offense on top of the baseline civil immigration violation. 8 U.S. Code §1253 states as follows:

“Any alien against whom a final order of removal is outstanding…who willfully fails or refuses to depart from the United States within a period of 90 days from the date of the final order of removal under administrative processes” or who “willfully fails or refuses to make timely application in good faith for travel or other documents necessary to the alien’s departure” or who “connives or conspires, or takes any other action, designed to prevent or hamper or with the purpose of preventing or hampering the alien’s departure pursuant to such” or who “willfully fails or refuses to present himself or herself for removal at the time and place required by the Attorney General pursuant to such order” is subject to up to four years of imprisonment.

ICE could go back and obtain a criminal warrant from a U.S. attorney in this case for violation of §1253, but the agency has never had to do this since the implementation of federal immigration laws in the late 1800s. The Ninth Circuit issued a lawless ruling requiring it to obtain a criminal warrant to break into a house or car to get an illegal alien. But that opinion is not valid outside the Ninth Circuit’s jurisdiction, especially as it violates Supreme Court precedent. In Turner v. Williams (1904), the court made it very clear that as long as immigration officers are not trying to criminally convict the alien but rather deport him, “Detention or temporary confinement as part of the means necessary to give effect to the exclusion or expulsion was held valid.” The fact that an alien commits another crime to hamper that apprehension doesn’t make him better off and give him the right to thwart the basic actions necessary to affect the removal.

This principle was clearly established by James Iredell, one of the authors of Article III of the Constitution and a founding member of the Supreme Court. In 1799, he said the following, applying even of people who were lawfully admitted into the country, much more to those who violate today’s immigration laws and are ordered to be deported:

“Any alien coming to this country must or ought to know, that this being an independent nation, it has all the rights concerning the removal of aliens which belong by the law of nations to any other; that while he remains in the country in the character of an alien, he can claim no other privilege than such as an alien is entitled to, and consequently, whatever [risk] he may incur in that capacity is incurred voluntarily, with the hope that in due time by his unexceptionable conduct, he may become a citizen of the United States.”

For now, there is civil disobedience against the immigration laws, even when the subjects are drunk drivers and even accused child molesters. The only question is whether the administration will begin enforcing current law. (For more from the author of “Anarchy: Protesters Help Stop ICE From Apprehending Criminal Alien” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

DOJ Preparing to Execute 5 Convicted Murderers: First Federal Executions in 16 Years

For the first time in almost two decades, the federal government is planning to execute criminals.

According to a Department of Justice press release sent out Thursday morning, Attorney General William Barr has directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to adopt a new addendum to federal protocols “clearing the way for the federal government to resume capital punishment after a nearly two decade lapse” and at the same time has asked BOP’s acting director to schedule the executions of five convicted murderers responsible for truly heinous crimes.

Those set to be executed include:

A man who “emotionally tortured, sexually molested, and then beat to death his two-and-a-half-year-old daughter”

A man who stabbed a 63-year-old grandmother to death and forced her nine-year-old granddaughter to sit beside the lifeless body before slitting the girl’s throat, crushing her head with rocks, and cutting off both victims’ heads and hands

A man who raped and murdered a 16-year-old girl before dismembering, burning, and throwing her remains in a septic pond

A member of a white supremacist group who murdered a family of three

A man who shot 5 people to death

“Congress has expressly authorized the death penalty through legislation adopted by the people’s representatives in both houses of Congress and signed by the President,” Attorney General Barr said in a statement. “Under Administrations of both parties, the Department of Justice has sought the death penalty against the worst criminals, including these five murderers, each of whom was convicted by a jury of his peers after a full and fair proceeding. The Justice Department upholds the rule of law—and we owe it to the victims and their families to carry forward the sentence imposed by our justice system.”

The death-row inmates in this situation, according to the release, have been convicted of murdering “the most vulnerable in our society—children and the elderly.”

The last person to be executed by the federal government, as opposed to a state government, was Louis Jones Jr., a Desert Storm veteran convicted of raping and murdering a female soldier by beating her to death with a tire iron in 1995. While Obama stopped short on efforts to put an end to the practice at the federal level in 2015, his administration put a de facto moratorium on executions. (For more from the author of “DOJ Preparing to Execute 5 Convicted Murderers: First Federal Executions in 16 Years” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

DOJ Says It Won’t Prosecute Barr and Ross on the House’s Contempt Vote

Despite a recent vote brought by House Democrats, the Department of Justice says it won’t take action to prosecute Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross for contempt of Congress.

In a letter sent to speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., on Wednesday night, Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen said that “the department will not bring the congressional contempt citations before a grand jury or take any other action to prosecute the attorney general or the secretary.”

Rosen cites precedent of non-prosecution of contempt votes against Bush and Obama administration officials from 2008 and 2012 as well as legal opinions from the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel going all the way back to the Reagan administration.

“Consistent with this long-standing position and uniform practice,” Rosen’s letter concludes, “the Department has determined that the responses by the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce to the subpoenas issued by the Committee on Oversight and Reform did not constitute a crime and accordingly, the Department will not bring the congressional contempt citations before a grand jury or take any other action to prosecute the Attorney General or the Secretary.”

The House voted to hold the two Trump cabinet officials in contempt of Congress last week over complaints from House Democrats about their degree of cooperation with a House investigation into the attempt to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census — an effort that the administration is now pursuing by other means.

“House Democrats never sought to have a productive relationship with the Trump Administration,” Ross said in response to the vote, “and today’s PR stunt further demonstrates their unending quest to generate headlines instead of operating in good faith with our Department.”

Contrary to the complaints, the administration says that it has been working through the proper administrative channels to work with Congress but hasn’t been given adequate time to do so.

“By taking this action, the House is both unnecessarily undermining inter-branch comity and degrading the constitutional separation of powers and its own institutional integrity,” Barr and Ross wrote to Pelosi about the contempt vote.

“The departments have already accommodated numerous Committee requests,” Barr and Ross continue, “The key remaining issue is how the Departments and the Committee will address the material that is protected by privileges that have been reaffirmed by the courts.”

The committee voted to hold Barr and Ross in contempt last month after the being delayed a few hours over the news that the White House had asserted executive privilege over the subpoenaed materials. A DOJ statement later the same day said the committee’s decision “defies logic” and “undermines Congress’s credibility with the American people.” (For more from the author of “DOJ Says It Won’t Prosecute Barr and Ross on the House’s Contempt Vote” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Found Injured in Cell After Possible Suicide Attempt; Epstein’s Trips to Clinton White House Revealed, Proving Bill LIED

By New York Post. Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein was found in his cell on Tuesday nearly unconscious with injuries to his neck after a possible suicide attempt, sources said.

Epstein was discovered by guards sprawled out on the floor at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, where he’s being held without bail on sex-trafficking charges, according to law enforcement sources. . .

Investigators believe Epstein may have done it to himself either on purpose or as a ploy to get transferred out of the jail, sources said.

It was also possible that Epstein was attacked by another inmate, the sources added. (Read more from “Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Found Injured in Cell After Possible Suicide Attempt” HERE)

_________________________________________________
Accused Quadruple Murderer, Ex-Cop Facing Death Penalty, Inexplicably Put in Same Jail Cell with Epstein

By Matt Spillane. Nicholas Tartaglione, a former Briarcliff Manor police officer charged in a quadruple homicide in Orange County, was allegedly questioned about how accused child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein was found injured in his Manhattan jail cell this week, according to nbcnewyork.com. . .

Credit Image: FlickR

Investigators talked to Tartaglione, who is also being held at MCC, as they also look into the possibility that Epstein might have been assaulted, NBC reported. Tartaglione denied having anything to do with Epstein’s injuries, according to NBC.

Bruce Barket, Tartaglione’s lawyer, told NBC that Tartaglione and Epstein get along well, and that his client did not assault the financier. Barket said the two men have been complaining about rodents, flooding, and food in the jail, according to NBC, which reported that Epstein is now on suicide watch.

Tartaglione made headlines recently after correction officers confiscated an illicit cellphone that was found in his cell on July 3, according to court records. He claimed his cellmate had tossed it to him as correction officers approached the cell, prosecutors said. (Read more from this story about pedophile Jeffrey Epstein HERE)

_________________________________________________

Jeffrey Epstein Visited Clinton White House Multiple Times in Early ’90s

By The Daily Beast. . .Now, a Daily Beast investigation has uncovered ties between Epstein and the Clinton administration that date back to the president’s earliest days in the White House, casting doubt on the oft-circulated narrative that the two only began associating after Clinton left office. . .

How Epstein entered Clinton’s orbit remains unclear. When the president released his initial statement on Epstein, he did not explain the multiple other trips he appears to have taken on the financier’s plane—including one flight to Westchester with Epstein, his alleged madam Ghislaine Maxwell, and an “unnamed female.” . . .

In late September of 1993, Bill and Hillary Clinton hosted a reception for supporters who had contributed to recent White House renovations. The nearly $400,000 overhaul—which included new gold draperies and a 13-color woven rug for the Oval Office—was funded entirely by donations to the White House Historical Association, a private organization that helps preserve and promote the White House as a historical monument. . .

Guests for the event, according to the invitation list, included the journalist and philanthropist Barbara Goldsmith, heiress Jane Engelhard, political consultant Cynthia Friedman, and “Mr Jeffrey Epstein and Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell.” Epstein and Maxwell do not appear on the ‘regret list,’ and there is a letter ‘A’ next to both of their names, indicating they planned to attend. A press release from the event, put out by Hillary Clinton’s office, lists Epstein as a White House Historical Association donor. . .

A letter from the following month reveals the extent of the financier’s generosity. Bernard R. Meyer, the executive vice president of the White House Historical Association, sent a note to Epstein’s Madison Avenue offices on Oct. 4, thanking him for his $10,000 contribution. The donation, Meyer wrote, would “assist in funding the costs of refurbishing the Oval Office in the West Wing and certain areas of the Executive Residence.” (Read more from “Jeffrey Epstein Visited Clinton White House Multiple Times in Early ’90s” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Mueller Breaks His Silence in Least Satisfying Way for Lawmakers; Trump Lawyer Attacks ‘Idiot’ Mueller

By Bloomberg. Robert Mueller maintained a disciplined silence for his entire 22-month investigation of Russian meddling and Donald Trump.

When he finally answered questions in public, the result was a halting and deeply unsatisfying event for lawmakers and the American public that may end up diluting the weight of his thorough 448-page report — and diminishing the reputation of the legendary lawman. . .

But rather than bring his sweeping investigation to life, as Democrats hoped, Mueller didn’t play the part he was cast. During more than five hours of public testimony, Mueller spoke softly, declined to read directly from his report and refused to elaborate in response to questions.

Mueller’s approach to the hearings contrasted starkly with the fast-paced, social-media savvy questions and posturing from lawmakers, at times creating awkward or boring moments.

The expectations Mueller was facing for this event may have simply been too high. Through his long silence, the former special counsel had become a mysterious and revered figure and, perhaps, the one person whose words could lead to Trump’s impeachment. (Read more from “Mueller Breaks His Silence in Least Satisfying Way for Lawmakers; Trump Lawyer Attacks ‘Idiot’ Mueller” HERE)

________________________________________________________

Giuliani Attacks ‘Idiot’ Mueller

By Mediaite. Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani was firing on all cylinders Wednesday morning when he tore into Special Counsel Robert Mueller (“idiot”) and Democrats (“idiots”) in a wild appearance on Fox & Friends.

Giuliani was on to talk about Mueller’s testimony on Capitol Hill, regarding President Donald Trump’s possible obstruction of the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. As they started off by talking about Trump’s rage-tweets against Mueller, Giuliani wasted no time tearing into the special counsel’s “witch hunt, which is falling apart.” . . .

“He doesn’t pay much attention to it, he was the Wizard of Oz, he’s behind a curtain. From then on, it was ‘We’ll take it to Bob, we’ll ask Bob.’ After a while, I would say ‘don’t bother.’ I mean, you guys are deciding, don’t bullsh*t, don’t tell me.”

(Read more from “Giuliani Attacks ‘Idiot’ Mueller” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE