Ocasio-Cortez Has a New Target: ‘Moderate’ Joe Biden

Hey Joe, what do ya know? Apparently not much when it comes to fighting against global warming, according to Democratic Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The freshman Congresswoman and leader on the socialistic style Green New Deal tweeted her disgust after sources revealed a part of Joe Biden’s plan to combat climate change, saying the Vice President displayed a “lack of leadership” with his potential “middle ground” proposal.

According to Reuters, “[t]he backbone of the policy will likely include the United States re-joining the Paris Climate Agreement and preserving U.S. regulations on emissions and vehicle fuel efficiency that Trump has sought to undo, according to one of the sources, Heather Zichal, who is part of a team advising Biden on climate change. She previously advised President Barack Obama.”

Reuters source also said that “the policy could also be supportive of nuclear energy and fossil fuel options like natural gas and carbon capture technology, which limit emissions from coal plants and other industrial facilities.”

In response, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez said, “This is a dealbreaker. There is no ‘middle ground’ w/ climate denial & delay. Blaming ‘blue collar’ Americans as the main opponents to bold climate policy is gas lobbyist 101.” . . .

This is Rep. Ocasio-Cortez’s first comments about a specific candidate in the 2020 race and could spell trouble for the current front runner of the Democratic primary campaign. (Read more from “Ocasio-Cortez Has a New Target: ‘Moderate’ Joe Biden” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Pentagon Approves More Funds for Border Wall

By Townhall. Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan has approved an additional $1.5 billion to build 80 more miles of President Trump’s border wall.

. . .

(Read more from “Pentagon Approves More Funds for Border Wall” HERE)

___________________________________________________

Pentagon Approves Plan to Shift $1.5B for Wall Along U.S.-Mexico Border

By Fox News. The Pentagon has approved a plan to spend an additional $1.5 billion to build 80 more miles of wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, a U.S. defense official confirmed to Fox News Friday.

Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan approved the re-allocation of funds, which were originally earmarked for support of Afghan security forces and other projects, to help pay for the wall along the southern border. . .

In March, Shanahan approved the first transfer of Defense Department dollars and redirected $1 billion to help build nearly 60 miles of wall in Yuma, Ariz. and El Paso, Texas.

The combined total of $2.5 billion is in response to President Trump’s declaration of a national emergency at the border.

But the plan to divert Pentagon funding has sparked criticism from congressional Democrats, who accused Shanahan of not seeking approval to “reprogram” the funds without congressional authority. Shanahan and other senior defense officials claimed in response they did not have to get permission from Congress despite the objections from Democratic lawmakers. (Read more from “Pentagon Approves Plan to Shift $1.5B for Wall Along U.S.-Mexico Border” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

‘Profound Scientist’ Bernie Sanders and Torturous Wind Turbines

Bernie Sanders has a lot of nerve mocking the president for an offhand remark about wind turbines. Especially since he defends the monstrosities that are torturing rural landowners.

During a long and jovial appearance in front of a friendly audience at the National Republican Congressional Committee’s annual spring dinner, President Trump said that wind turbines cause property values to go down and continued, “And they say the noise causes cancer.”

Bernie Sanders pounced on that offhand comment and mocked Trump, saying, “And he’s a profound scientist, someone who’s researched the issue for years and uniquely came up with that conclusion,” Sanders said.

But you know, you don’t have to research the issue for many years to come up with the conclusion that wind turbines are slowly torturing rural folks, and in some instances, the sleep deprivation and stress can in fact lead people down a path of poor health.

In a piece published in the Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, Carl V. Phillips has indeed concluded, “There is overwhelming evidence that wind turbines cause serious health problems in nearby residents, usually stress-disorder-type diseases, at a nontrivial rate.”

Optical flickering, caused when the blades pass through sunlight, and noises both audible and nonaudible have led people to abandon their homes or demand recompense for the pains they have to live with even after they were assured by lying wind energy proponents that these things would not happen.

Phillips highlighted three particular accounts from people who live close to the turbines, including the account of a five-year-old who could not sleep due to the exposure to the noise and became defiant and irritable. His issues were destroying his school life. Once the family abandoned their home, the boy recovered.

The account described the constant noise:

They are loud. They’ve been compared to jet engines, a plane that will not take off. There is no gentle swoosh, it is a whoosh noise. They grind, they bang, they creak. The noise is like surround sound, it’s omnidirectional.

In another account, a woman explained how she has developed tinnitus and a slew of other health problems due to the audible and nonaudible sounds the turbines made. She noted how many homeowners had to abandon their homes to get some peace. Her account is not unusual, telling of the nonaudible sounds that shake parts of the house and are in no way rhythmic, adding to sleep deprivation and sensitivity to movement and noise.

The noise is constant, some days louder than others. It is not noise I enjoy or choose to be around. It is noise I cannot escape. I live with the movement of shadow flicker created by the rotation of the turbines, coming through my dining room window as I drink my coffee in the morning. I have developed a sensitivity in which now I cannot even tolerate the movement of a small ceiling fan. The skies where I live are no longer clear but dotted with blinking red lights marking the height of the turbines. When the turbines are down, a constant buzzing noise is emitted from the motionless structures. I have developed tinnitus in my ears. I hear and feel the pulsating of the turbines and buzzing in my ears. I also feel the pulsating in my throat and chest.

Yet another man attributes his ailments to the fact that his property abuts property with turbines on it. It is not only the people who accept the turbines on their property, but their neighbors who suffer too. The man in the third account created a list of all the ailments he has, well documented by health professionals, that he attests are due to the wind turbines.

anxiety

stress

nervousness

sleep deprivation

hypertension

migraines

dizziness

blurred vision

palpitations

irritability

anger

upset stomach

depression

Here’s a good example of the banging and creaking, captured by Ed Sliwinsky of New York.

Now why are we allowing proponents of wind power to lie to rural people about the side effects of allowing wind turbines near their property? People like Bernie Sanders don’t seem to care one iota about the loss of lifestyle and health due to these monstrosities.

By the way, did Sanders ever mention that Vermonters have had it with these monstrosities? Too late to stop them, but they are fighting them now all the way because they can see the cost.

They have watched as time and time again, turbine proponents come through small rural areas, waving tax dollars around to impress the county commissioners, and lying through their teeth about the noise and health costs to anyone within a mile or two of the behemoths. Once the commissioners okay everything, there is no turning back.

Is sleep deprivation a type of torture? How about loud noise? How would you like to live near an airport where jet engines constantly run but never take off? And you were there first! These turbines are being sold to the public under falsehoods, just so politicians can feel good about “doing something for the environment.” Human beings are part of the environment, and somehow, our health problems are the subject now of mockery by socialists who wish to rule this nation. (For more from the author of “‘Profound Scientist’ Bernie Sanders and Torturous Wind Turbines” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump Is Right to Oppose More ‘Disaster’ or Puerto Rico Spending – It’s Bloated Pork

If Republicans merely got through their tenures without increasing net spending, it would be an unprecedented victory. Thankfully, President Trump is finally putting his foot down on yet another $17.3 billion disaster package winding its way through Congress.

In April, Republicans were ready to throw another $13.5 billion in disaster aid at the gods of political pork. Thankfully, they were stopped by the intransigence of the Left. Democrats felt that the $600 million earmarked for nutrition assistance for Puerto Rico wasn’t enough, even though they have already appropriated $40 billion in disaster aid and Puerto Rico has already received a quasi-bailout for its culture of debt.

But given how sensitive Republicans are to the identity politics inherent in squabbles over funding for Puerto Rico, they were on their way to pursuing their favorite pastime – caving to the Democrats on their spending demands – until President Trump stepped in and demanded an end to all new aid for the mismanaged island.

Today, House Democrats will vote on their $17.3 billion version (H.R. 2157) of disaster aid in the face of the looming veto threat from the president. While it’s not news that Democrats will pass this bill, what should be alarming is that Senate Republicans are planning to follow suit. Republicans continue to move to the Democrat position, begging them to accept even more money for Puerto Rico rather than holding their ground.

Agreeing to the entire premise of the Democrats that Puerto Rico is a national emergency instead of our border, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said yesterday, “We’re open to additional Puerto Rican assistance” and, “We need to pass it out of the Senate before the Memorial Day recess.”

Here’s the reality. Under regular spending, all of the relevant agencies and departments receiving funding under this supplemental spending bill, particularly the Department of Transportation and HUD, have record high budgets thanks to huge spending over the past few years. Spending is now 13.7 percent higher than under Obama’s final year, and that is with the economy doing much better. On top of that, over the past few years, Congress already passed $117.5 billion in disaster spending in 2017 and included numerous disaster relief provisions in the appropriations bills of the past two fiscal years.

Additionally, much of the disaster aid has nothing to do with immediate emergency needs, but with filling the already bloated coffers of liberal HUD and Department of Agriculture programs. Much as with any package that is titled “children,” any bill titled “disaster relief” is beyond reproach, circumspection, or any verification of the need for each line item. Given that so much money has already been appropriated, no new funds should be appropriated in a rush without any oversight unless they are clearly urgent needs, not long-term policies.

This bill throws more money at the Community Development Block Grant program. The CDBG has long been a wasteful welfare program for low-income housing assistance and other local parochial projects that should have been shouldered by local governments long before any natural disasters hit. Trump’s OMB suggested eliminating it altogether, and even the Obama administration proposed cuts in fiscal year 2012 because, in their words, the program lacked a “focused impact,” making “the demonstration of outcomes difficult to measure and evaluate.” But the hurricanes provided liberals with a good opportunity for those always looking to expand this program to do so under the veneer of emergency spending, even though Congress already grew its budget by 88 percent in the budget deal last year.

While this bill covers long-term spending, not just emergency needs, it doesn’t offer long-term reforms that should accompany any immediate bailouts. Congress already enacted yet another $16 billion bailout of the flood insurance program without any desire to reform the government’s monopoly over flood insurance that has induced people to build in flood zones in the first place. This bill contains yet another extension of the program.

Perhaps the most egregious element is another $3 billion thrown at farm aid. Congress just passed a $900 billion farm bill in December, doubling down on massive subsidies for corporate farms and landowners who aren’t even farmers, while guaranteeing all protection from even “shallow loss” of revenue. This is the problem with Congress’ modus operandi of double- and triple-dipping. They embed endless individual and corporate welfare into the regular appropriations bills and then step on the gas pedal to raise the spending levels as quickly as possible. Then, when there is a disaster, they come back for more in supplemental disaster bills, as if they never spent money on these very programs before.

Then there is the issue of Puerto Rico. It’s terribly tragic that it was pummeled with a direct hit from Hurricane Maria, resulting in the death of thousands of island residents. But the hurricane was not the primary driver of Puerto Rico’s economic problems. The desire for more funding beyond the existing $40 billion aid package is coming more from the long-term fallout of its Venezuela-like Marxist economic system than from the immediate effects of the hurricane.

Puerto Rico managed to rack up more debt than its economic output long before Hurricane Maria. A huge 43 percent of its residents received food stamps long before Hurricane Maria. And 26 percent of Puerto Rican workers were employed by government and also receiving 30 days of vacation long before Hurricane Maria.

The bottom line is that there is no reason why the American people should be on the hook for throwing good money after bad money before Puerto Rico cleans up the systemic government corruption and socialism that existed before the natural disasters. Ideally, Puerto Rico should be given its independence, so it can prosper without any interference but also not rely on American welfare like a security blanket.

In the meantime, Congress should help Puerto Rico by repealing the 1920 Jones Act, which requires ships sailing within the United States to be built, owned, and managed by U.S. companies. It has hampered trade and imports for Puerto Rico by often doubling the cost of shipping.

Finally, there is the issue of the border. The true emergency we have is the invasion at our border, and neither party in Congress cares much about it. Not only does this bill fail to deal with that crisis, it explicitly bars the use of any defense funding for the border. Certainly, the GOP’s competing bill in the Senate will not contain this provision, but nor will Republicans push any legislation to fix the crisis by hiring more ICE agents, building more border infrastructure, or punishing sanctuary cities. Why is there no hell-fire rush from Mitch McConnell to treat that issue as a “must pass” before Memorial Day?

Many conservatives were concerned that President Trump would make the GOP the party of big spending. Turns out, for someone who is not known as a fiscal conservative, he sure is willing to cut spending more than GOP leaders in Congress. (For more from the author of “Trump Is Right to Oppose More ‘Disaster’ or Puerto Rico Spending – It’s Bloated Pork” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

House Conservatives Sign Letter Urging Pelosi Not to Blow out out Spending Limits in New Budget

Several Republican members of the House of Representatives are urging speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to take a “modest” step toward controlling the national debt by sticking to Congress’ current spending limits.

“As you know, our nation recently surpassed $22 trillion in debt,” explains the letter spearheaded by Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, and signed by dozens of other members. “With every hour that passes, we add $100 million to that figure. That is unconscionable. That must end.”

The letter goes on to point out that, even at current spending levels with the same currently low interest rates, “spending on interest alone will surpass defense spending within 5 years.” It also points out that Medicare and Social Security are slated to run out of money in the next few years.

“The good news is that current law is on our side to restrain spending,” the letter continues. “Congress should hold overall spending to the caps levels already in place while ensuring our men and women in uniform have the tools necessary to do their job. Doing so would be a modest step on a path towards balancing the budget.”

The Budget Control Act of 2011 is another example of Washington D.C.’s seemingly never-ending, debt-increasing budgetary pageantry.

As a Congressional Research Service report explains, the BCA was originally passed with enforcement mechanisms to control spending and the debt. However, raising spending limits and the debt ceiling have pretty much become regular occurrences on Capitol Hill.

Roy recently called out efforts by Congressional leadership to raise the debt limit, saying, “Only in Washington is it considered appropriate to endlessly lift one’s borrowing limit without even a hint of shame or a plan to stop it.”

“If we can’t at least agree to stick to the [spending] caps, we will cease to be the ‘land of opportunity,’ where one’s circumstances at birth needn’t define one’s life trajectory,” the new letter concludes. “Hold to the caps, budget like American families do every day, and let’s work on a bipartisan basis to ensure a bright future for our sons and daughters.”

Current signatories include Reps. Jim Jordan, Ohio; Mark Meadows, N.C.; Andy Biggs, Ariz.; Louie Gohmert, Texas; Ken Buck, Colo.; Thomas Massie, Ky.; Justin Amash, Mich.; Jeff Duncan, S.C.; and Warren Davidson, Ohio.

The letter will be sent to the speaker’s office on Friday, a press release explains, and Roy’s office will continue to collect signatures until it is sent over. (For more from the author of “House Conservatives Sign Letter Urging Pelosi Not to Blow out out Spending Limits in New Budget” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Here Are the FACTS About Pelosi’s and Nadler’s So-Called ‘Constitutional Crisis’ Over the Mueller Report

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., says that the United States is in a “crisis” because the administration is violating the Constitution in its standoff with House Democrats over the Mueller report.

The facts, however, tell a different story.

“If your question is will the administration violate the Constitution of the United States and not abide by the request of Congress in its legitimate oversight responsibilities, that remains to be seen,” the speaker told reporters at her weekly press conference on Thursday. “Every day they are advertising their obstruction of justice by ignoring subpoenas” and other objections to House Democrats’ demands.

Pelosi went on to say that she agrees with House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., in his assertion that the United States is supposedly now in the middle of a “constitutional crisis” because “the administration has decided that they are not going to honor their oath of office.”

So, are the Trump administration’s actions really a violation of the Constitution? Let’s do a quick fact-check here. What does the Constitution say about this particular situation? Not that much.

Here are the facts:

Attorney General Barr released a redacted version of a confidential report on the Mueller report, which he was under no statutory obligation to do.

Nadler subpoenaed the full, unredacted Mueller report and its underlying evidence from the Department of Justice.

The Department has objected to this, saying that the requested materials contain grand jury information that is protected by section 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

That section of the rules says that grand jury information cannot be made public without a court order, which has not been issued.

Despite all this, the DOJ has allowed a dozen members of Congress to come and view a less-redacted version in a secure location at the Department.

None of the six permitted Democrats have come forward so far to take advantage of that offer.

The Department of Justice has reiterated its invitation for Nadler to come view the less-redacted report and work out a compromise in compliance with federal rules.

House/DOJ talks fell apart, and House Democrats scheduled contempt proceedings against Barr.

In response to the contempt proceedings, the White House invoked executive privilege over the contested portions of the Mueller report.

The House of Representatives’ own website acknowledges that the “Constitution says nothing about congressional investigations and oversight,” but says that Congress’ oversight powers were rather implied by historical understanding of the Founders, who got their understanding of it from Congress’ forerunners in the British parliament.

There’s no specific language in the document that gives Congress the ability to issue subpoenas, nor is there anything that outlines how the executive branch is supposed to respond to congressional subpoenas that demand information that can’t be released without a court order.

And given the nature of the situation, the argument could very easily be made that the executive branch has already more than upheld its constitutional obligations to Congress’ implied oversight powers by its repeated offers to allow leaders from both parties from both chambers to come and view the document, minus the secret grand jury information.

At most, we appear to be looking at a constitutional question — not a crisis.

Full video of Pelosi’s press conference can be found here:

(For more from the author of “Here Are the FACTS About Pelosi’s and Nadler’s So-Called ‘Constitutional Crisis’ Over the Mueller Report” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Alleged Colorado Juvenile Transgender Shooter Identified

By Breitbart. The alleged juvenile shooter at STEM School Highlands Ranch Tuesday has been identified as Maya McKinney, a girl who is reported to be “transitioning” from female to male, said the Denver Post.

McKinney, 16, who uses the name “Alec,” is being charged under her legal name of Maya Elizabeth.

According to the report, McKinney and the other shooting suspect, Devon Erickson, 18, appeared at Douglas County Courthouse Wednesday. McKinney sat next to her mother, who reportedly remained at the table in the courtroom alone, crying, after her daughter was removed. . .

The Post reported:

McKinney’s attorney offered some clarity to his client’s gender identity during the court hearing after Douglas County Sheriff Tony Spurlock identified the Juvenile suspect as a boy immediately after the shooting and then as a girl during an early Wednesday morning news conference.

(Read more from “Alleged Colorado Juvenile Transgender Shooter Identified” HERE)

___________________________________________________

Suspected STEM School Shooters Appeared in Court While Classroom Heroes Were Lauded by Family and Friends

By The Denver Post. John Castillo stared through teary eyes across a Douglas County courtroom Wednesday at the teens suspected of killing his son when gunfire erupted inside of STEM School Highlands Ranch the day before.

For more than two hours Wednesday, Castillo sat through the initial court hearings for the teens arrested in connection to the shooting. Investigators suspect that the two teens brought handguns into the school of 1,800 students and opened fire inside — killing Castillo’s son, Kendrick, and injuring eight others.

The shooting has once again plummeted the U.S. into discussions about gun violence, access to firearms and school safety. Politicians gave condolences and expressed outrage. Parents wrote online of the fear they felt sending their kids to school. STEM School students still struggled to understand how their calm campus became the most recent example of violent tragedy. Two vigils were held Wednesday night.

One of the shooting suspects, Devon Erickson, sat hunched in his chair throughout his hearing where he was advised of the charges he is being held on. As the proceeding continued, the skinny 18-year-old with shaggy black and pink hair curled farther into himself — his bangs nearly touching the defense table by the end.

Alec McKinney — who is charged under the legal name of Maya Elizabeth McKinney but uses male pronouns and the name Alec — sat up straight in [her] chair. (Read more from “Suspected STEM School Shooters Appeared in Court Wednesday While Classroom Heroes Were Lauded by Family and Friends” HERE)

___________________________________________________

Accused Transgender Shooter Demands Court Call Her a “He”

Lawyers for the second suspect in the Colorado school shooting, Maya McKinney, who is listed in court records as a female, asked the court to use the pronoun “he.”

The 16-year-old McKinney is transgender and was transitioning from female to male at the time of Tuesday’s shooting at the STEM School Highlands Ranch in Highlands Ranch, Colo., that left one student dead and eight others wounded. McKinney reportedly identifies as a male and goes by the name Alec. (Read more about the alleged transgender shooter HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

April Was Another Record Month for Illegal Immigration

The problem with waiting months to act decisively at the border is that we become accustomed to the new normal of record border numbers.

According to Customs and Border Protection (CBP), April set yet another record, with a total of 109,000 apprehensions at the southwest border. Unless the administration harnesses this news and calls for a complete shutoff of immigration processing at the border, it’s unlikely that the numbers will fall significantly. The partial measures being pursued currently might have worked a year ago when we warned about the tsunami, but not now that we are squarely in the storm.

Here are the key takeaways from the April CBP border report:

In total, 109,144 individuals were apprehended at the border – 98,977 between points of entry and 10,167 at points of entry. This is the highest number in 12 years, it is very likely the highest number of unique individuals of all time, given that many in the past were the same individuals deported multiple times within the same week, while almost all of these are first-timers.

The 58,474 individuals in family units set another record, but an increasing number of people are also coming as single adults, 31,606. The overwhelming number of single adults are from Mexico, while most of the family units and unaccompanied teens are from Central America.

The increases over the previous month seemed to be from the Rio Grande Valley (RGV), El Paso, and Yuma sectors, the three busiest corridors in absolute numbers. Overall, for this fiscal year, every sector has seen a massive increase in family units.

Guatemala still leads the pack for the most migrants coming in all categories, followed by Honduras, with a sharp drop-off for Salvadorans. Overall, 301,900 Guatemalans were apprehended at and between points of entry since the beginning of fiscal year 2018. In other words, in just 19 months, 1.7 percent of Guatemala’s population came to our border, and that is on top of the 815,000 Guatemalan nationals who already lived here, most of them illegally. A recent poll showed that a third of Guatemalans would like to immigrate to the U.S. A total of 224,078 Hondurans have come since FY 2018, 2.4 percent of the population. That is on top of the 623,000 already here. This means that the size of these countries’ populations in America equal roughly 6.6 percent and 9.2 percent of their respective populations in Guatemala and Honduras. “Only” 79,000 have come from El Salvador over the past 19 months, but because they dominated the Central American migration in previous years, we already had 1.4 million Salvadorans in this country as of last year, representing roughly 22 percent of their entire homeland population!

Has the trajectory been bent? Will the numbers go down in May? Well, CBP reported on Tuesday that during the first week in May, there were 10,000 apprehensions in the Rio Grande Valley, a new weekly record. During the 30 days of April, there were 36,681 apprehensions in the RGV. It is therefore clear that the message has not yet gone out to Central America that we are no longer tolerating this violation of sovereignty.

Unlike in the past, when mainly single adults were coming over and were immediately repatriated, most of these individuals are being released. ICE has released 168,000 just since December 21, and that number doesn’t include the 33,000 released by CBP directly without ever being processed in an ICE holding facility since March 19. If these individuals are never repatriated, the lifetime cost to taxpayers, as estimated by the Center for Immigration Studies, would be roughly $30 billion.

This is the part of the crisis that is never discussed. The philosophical problem with the approach of our government over the past year is that when circumstances such as lack of detention space create a scenario where our laws cannot be implemented properly, they err on the side of the alien and not on the side of the American people.

Our laws require that every alien, including those seeking asylum and even those approved for it, be detained throughout the entire process. Moreover, our laws require that these economic migrants be immediately placed into expedited removal. Any appeal of a credible fear denial must be handled within a day and no later than seven days, according to existing law. Why should the fact that they flood us with invasion levels of migrants strengthen their hands to achieve the very intent of their mission? Why should the fact that they increase the illegal smuggling to levels that can’t be detained result in rewarding the cartels with catch-and-release and making Americans pay for the crime, gangs, drugs, lack of security checkpoints, fiscal costs, cultural problems in the schools, and the health risks?

Part of the problem is that the desires of the aliens are individualized and immediately apparent before the TV cameras. The harm they cause to Americans – both directly through fiscal, security, and health concerns and indirectly by draining off resources and empowering the cartels and gangs – are long-term, less apparent, and often go unreported. Nobody sees a rapist right at the border, but there are sadly plenty of people like Juan Leon-Gomez, an illegal alien from Guatemala, who is now charged with raping and impregnating an 11-year-old girl and keeping her in his closet. The TV cameras show 16-year-olds in need at the border, but they won’t show you how 40 percent of those caught in a recent MS-13 sting were border teens who were resettled as refugees.

The entire purpose of our federal government is to care for Americans, not foreign invaders.

Today, as the DHS announces the unprecedented data from April, would be the most auspicious time for the president to announce a complete shutoff of all cross-border migration of those who show up without documentation. Unless he acts now, the American people will become used to the cartels and illegal aliens pouring over our border as the new normal. (For more from the author of “April Was Another Record Month for Illegal Immigration” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Mike Pence Makes BIG Announcement About the Trump Administration

At a Wednesday speech at a Federalist Society event in Washington, D.C., Vice President Mike Pence took aim at judicial activism and the practice of lower courts of unilaterally blocking laws and policies from taking effect.

The administration plans to fight this practice, Pence explained, by bringing the question of nationwide injunctions before the Supreme Court.

“The Supreme Court of the United States must clarify that district judges can decide no more than the cases before them,” said Pence. “And it’s imperative that we restore the historic tradition that district judges do not set policy for the whole nation. In the days ahead, our administration will seek opportunities to put this very question before the Supreme Court to ensure that decisions affecting every American are made either by those elected to represent the American people or by the highest court in the land.”

“The kind of government control that our Founders were concerned about is too often exerted by the administrative state in this country,” Pence explained. “And it’s been emerging in recent years in the federal judiciary in the form of nationwide injunctions.”

A nationwide injunction is a court order sent out by lower judges that prevents the executive branch from enforcing policies, statutes and/or regulations all across the country. Such orders affect parties who aren’t remotely involved in the case and are one of the most popular tools of activist judges to thwart the efforts of the Trump White House.

And it’s not just the White House that has a problem with nationwide injunctions. During his remarks, Pence also cited a 2018 Supreme Court Opinion from Justice Clarence Thomas, who wrote:

These injunctions are beginning to take a toll on the federal court system— preventing legal questions from percolating through the federal courts, encouraging forum shopping, and making every case a national emergency for the courts and for the Executive Branch.

I am skeptical that district courts have the authority to enter universal injunctions. These injunctions did not emerge until a century and a half after the founding. And they appear to be inconsistent with longstanding limits on equitable relief and the power of Article III courts. If their popularity continues, this Court must address their legality.

Indeed, while our federal courts go back to the earliest days of our republic, the ability of lower court judges to unilaterally hamstring the executive with the flick of a pen and bang of a gavel is a far more recent innovation.

“This obstruction at the district [court] level is unprecedented. Studies show that there’s not a single example of a nationwide injunction in the first 175 years of our nation’s history,” Pence said. “The truth is, our administration has been unfairly hit with more nationwide injunctions than the first 40 American presidents combined.”

The vice president also made the case that such injunctions are hazardous to Americans’ safety, arguing that they compromise national security by “obstructing the lawful ability of the President to stop threats to the homeland, where he sees them.”

Lest we forget, Trump v. Hawaii — about which Justice Thomas wrote the earlier opinion — was over President Trump’s ability to use the president’s plenary powers to pause immigration due to national security concerns.

“These injunctions undermine the rule of law and the separation of powers that are central to our nation’s founding, that lie at the very heart of our Constitution,” Pence concluded. “And so I say to all those gathered here, for the sake of our liberty, our security, our prosperity, and the separation of powers: This era of judicial activism must come to an end.”

While new legal precedent from the Supreme Court might be the most realistic way to end the capricious practice of nationwide injunctions with a divided national government, it isn’t the only way; Congress also has the power to act.

Last session, the GOP-controlled House Judiciary Committee considered and approved a bill that would have ended the universal injunctions once and for all, despite protests from committee Democrats.

“We are at a crossroads in our nation,” wrote Conservative Review’s Daniel Horowitz about a recent nationwide injunction case out of California. “Either we have three branches of government, or we have one branch of government, with the most liberal of the 94 district courts controlling every aspect of our country.” (For more from the author of “Mike Pence Makes BIG Announcement About the Trump Administration” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

This Is the Bill New York Passed to Try and Trash the Trump Administration

With President Donald Trump not playing the Democrats’ impeachment games (and rightfully so), states have done their part in fighting this administration. Washington State and New Jersey have passed laws keeping presidential candidates off the ballot if they don’t release their taxes. Well, it’s not like any Republican candidate was going to win those states anyway, but it’s all part of the two-year long temper tantrum over Hillary Clinton’s shocking election loss in 2016.

Taxes remain another front in the ongoing crusade to impeach Trump. Democrats don’t have Russian collusion anymore; that was nuked by the Mueller report. They’re still clinging to obstruction of justice, but there’s not enough evidence to pursue charges, as determined by Attorney General William Barr and soon-to-be-ex Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The only evidence in the affirmative is that liberal CNN pundits think this happened because…they don’t like Trump. Belief is not evidence. And excuse me if I don’t care what a horde of former Obama officials have to say on this matter. With the Treasury Department refusing to turn over information on Trump’s finances, New York State is making legislative moves to make that happen, passing a bill that would allow them to turn over such documents if asked by Congress. Yet, this will only apply to state income taxes (via NBC News):

The New York State Senate passed a bill Wednesday that would make it easier for Congress to obtain President Donald Trump’s state tax returns, a measure that Gov. Andrew Cuomo has said he will sign if it reaches his desk.

The bill, called the TRUST Act, passed by a 39-to-21 vote. It would amend state law to permit the commissioner of the state Department of Taxation and Finance to release any state tax return requested by the leaders of the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Finance Committee or the Joint Committee on Taxation for any “specific and legitimate legislative purpose.” Existing laws generally prohibit such a release.

Those congressional committees could file a request with the state only after efforts to gain access to federal tax filings through the U.S. Treasury Department failed.

(Read more from “This Is the Bill New York Passed to Try and Trash the Trump Administration” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE