‘Is MS-13 Manufactured?’ Mark Levin Blows up Democrat Border Crisis Deniers

Wednesday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin was on fire, hammering home the case for supporting President Donald Trump’s effort to keep pressure on the Democrats until they compromise on funding a border security wall.

Levin rounded on the Democrats for suggesting the crisis on the border is “manufactured.”

“Is MS-13 manufactured? Is the importation of drugs manufactured?” Levin said. “When our federal law enforcement, the Border Patrol, ICE, the DEA, and others tell us what’s going on on the southern border and the consequences, are they all lying to us?”

Listen:

Levin blasted progressives for making a “crisis” out of health care, out of student loans, and out of climate change, while at each turn demanding massive government action to solve these so-called crises, but not for the border.

“It’s not the government’s job to run health care or colleges. It’s not the government’s job to nationalize air and water. It’s not the government’s job to destroy the Second Amendment and so forth. It is the government’s job to secure the border,” Levin said.

Levin warned that if Republicans buckle and reopen the government without concessions from the Democrats, the fight for border security will be lost.

“What’s at stake is our constitutional system, our republican system,” Levin said. “Because if the Democrats get away with this, with a 30-vote majority in the House of Representatives where we control the Senate and the presidency, if they get away with it this time, we will never stop this, ever. We will never be able to secure that border.” (For more from the author of “‘Is MS-13 Manufactured?’ Mark Levin Blows up Democrat Border Crisis Deniers” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Republicans Are Pushing for a Compromise on the Border Wall — Here’s How They Want to Entice Democrats

Republicans are quietly orchestrating a large immigration bill that would fund the border wall, but entice Democrats with some concessions, according to a report from CNN’s Manu Raju.

Raju reported that the deal would included $5.7 billion for the border wall that President Donald Trump has promised for more than two years, and it would give Democrats what they want in return — support for amnesty through DACA.

DACA is the amnesty granted by former President Barack Obama to some illegal aliens through “deferral” of deportations. The program has been excoriated by Republicans, including the president, but he has also said in the past that he could support some form of the policy.

The report says that the plan is still in early stages, but that Republican Senators hope it will lead to a breakthrough to end the government shutdown, now in its third week.

Raju said that Trump’s son-in-law and top aide Jared Kushner, indicated that the White House would be interested in a deal that would get funding for the border wall and could pass the Senate. He did not say whether Trump would sign the proposed legislation.

(Read more from “Republicans Are Pushing for a Compromise on the Border Wall — Here’s How They Want to Entice Democrats” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Shocking Poll Reveals Number of Americans Who Want to Leave Country for Good

. . .According to a recent Gallup Poll, a full 16% of Americans want to leave the United States for good, which matches the numbers from 2017. What’s significant about the numbers is how much they sharply contrast with the number of Americans who wished to leave during the George W. Bush (11%) or Barack Obama administrations (10%). While Gallup did not inquire upon people’s political leanings when taking the poll, desire to leave was strongest among women and young Americans.

“During the first two years of the Trump administration, a record-high one in five U.S. women (20%) said they would like to move to another country permanently if they could,” reports Gallup. “This is twice the average for women during the Obama (10%) or Bush years (11%) and almost twice the level among men (13%) under Trump. Before the Trump years, there was no difference between men’s and women’s desires to move.”

Obviously, none of this has to do with any of President Trump’s policies, because contrary to the fantastical ruminations of feminists, women do not live in “The Handmaid’s Tail” under this current administration. So if women are so triggered by President Trump that they want to leave, it seemingly has everything to do with his character and rhetoric. . .

For younger Americans under 30, the 30% who wish to leave also represents a significant uptick over earlier years, with 40% of women younger than 30 saying they would like to leave versus 20% of men in the same age group. After age 50, the gap narrows and eventually disappears.

Poorer Americans also desire to migrate at higher levels (20%), more than twice the percentage than during Obama’s term. “So far under Trump, three in 10 Americans (30%) in the poorest 20% say they would like to migrate if they could, compared with an average of 13% under Obama,” reports Gallup. (Read more from “Shocking Poll Reveals Number of Americans Who Want to Leave for Good” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s ‘Green New Deal’ Is Powered by Unicorns

The idea that conservatives are generally upset over a video of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez imitating the dance scene from “The Breakfast Club” may be a textbook example of fake news. In contrast, her proposal for a “Green New Deal” is real news, but fake policy.

In a “60 Minutes” interview that aired Sunday, the darling of democratic socialism proposed eliminating carbon emissions within 12 years. Ocasio-Cortez has previously avoided specifying how she would pay for her “Green New Deal.”

The “Frequently Asked Questions” section accompanying her draft resolution claims it could be funded in the “same ways that we paid for the 2008 bank bailout and extended quantitative easing programs, the same ways we paid for World War II and many other wars. The Federal Reserve can extend credit to power these projects and investments, new public banks can be created (as in WWII) to extend credit and a combination of various taxation tools (including taxes on carbon and other emissions and progressive wealth taxes) can be employed.” The war metaphor is among the classics of collectivism.

Ocasio-Cortez now falls back on the comforting myth that everything is affordable by soaking the rich with higher income taxes. She told Anderson Cooper that “once you get to, like, the tippy tops, on your 10 millionth dollar, sometimes you see tax rates as high as 60 or 70 percent. That doesn’t mean all $10 million are taxed at an extremely high rate, but it means that as you climb up this ladder you should be contributing more.” . . .

In a nutshell (where Ocasio-Cortez is dwelling, policy-wise), the problem is that our technological capacities are not quite what they are in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. According to Tom Pyle, president of the Institute for Energy Research: “One hundred percent renewable energy defies the laws of physics. It would be impossible to achieve.” There is no Tony Stark here with an Arc Reactor for everyone. Instead, we have Elon Musk, sparking up like Bob Marley after years of government subsidies. (Read more from “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s ‘Green New Deal’ Is Powered by Unicorns” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Report: Facebook and Twitter Consult With Terror-Tied CAIR Over Who Gets Banned From Platforms

The Hamas-tied Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), which is best known as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing case in U.S. history, appears to have access to high-ranking Facebook and Twitter executives and has communicated with these individuals about who should be allowed to stay on their platforms, according to a Wall Street Journal report published Tuesday.

The Wall Street Journal reports that CAIR officials “complained to Twitter” about activist Laura Loomer, citing a tweet in which she called the anti-Semitic Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., an anti-Semite and an apologist for Sharia law. Loomer was later permanently banned from Twitter.

Zahra Billoo, the executive director of CAIR’s San Francisco chapter, was quoted in the Journal piece as an individual who appears to have special access to both Twitter and Facebook.

“The council doesn’t often step in to advocate against other users, says Executive Director Zahra Billoo, but did so in the case of Ms. Loomer based on her previous comments about Muslims,” the piece explains.

Yet the Wall Street Journal fails to note that Billoo herself is a proven radical extremist. In tweets that remain publicly available, Billoo has expressed her support for an Islamic caliphate and Sharia law. She also claims, in multiple tweets, that ISIS is on the same moral plane as American and Israeli soldiers, adding that “our troops are engaged in terrorism.”

Billoo is not an anomaly at CAIR. Her views reflect the mainstream consensus within the organization, which over the years has attempted to transform itself from a clandestine Hamas-funding operation to a mainstream Muslim “civil rights organization.” CAIR directors have cheered terrorist attacks, publicly declared support for terrorist groups, and engage in regular bigotry against various religions, ethnicities, women, homosexuals, and others.

However, not everyone is buying into this supposed transformation. In 2014, the United Arab Emirates classified CAIR as a terrorist organization, given its ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Several bills have been introduced in both houses of Congress designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. It remains unclear if CAIR would be included, given its substantial ties to Hamas and, by extension, the Muslim Brotherhood.

For years, Silicon Valley tech giants have been all too eager to look the other way and allow groups like CAIR to use their platform to spread propaganda completely unchecked. Others have bought into the group’s newfound “civil rights group” label and even funded CAIR’s advocacy. Now, the social media titans appear to be consulting with CAIR on the censoring and banning of unwanted individuals and groups. (For more from the author of “Report: Facebook and Twitter Consult With Terror-Tied CAIR Over Who Gets Banned From Platforms” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Professor Behind Journal Paper Hoax Fears He Could Lose His Job

A professor who fooled prestigious journals into running absurd hoax papers, as a test of their bias, says he may now lose his job because of his actions.

Peter Boghossian was one of three people who collaborated last year to test the standards of various university disciplines, submitting papers loaded with left-wing buzzwords to journals in fields like feminism, race studies, queer studies, and cultural studies.

Many prestigious journals fell for their absurd hoax papers. A leading feminist journal published a section of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf that had simply been re-written with fashionable buzzwords. Another journal published a paper about “rape culture and queer performativity” in dog parks. . .

The three hoaxers all say that they are liberals, but they feared some university disciplines had gone off the deep end and now value politics over truth.

While many saw the professors’ test as important, some within the university system were not amused and are now hitting back at the hoaxers. (Read more from “Professor Behind Journal Paper Hoax Fears He Could Lose His Job” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Coming to a City Near You: Health Care for All (Including Illegal Aliens)

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has decided to lead the progressive charge on the health care front. On Tuesday, de Blasio announced the city would pay for anyone, including illegal aliens, to receive health care, something they’ve dubbed NYC Care.

The city plans to spend at least $100 million per year on the 600,000 or so who don’t qualify for insurance or are in the country illegally can receive medical treatment, the New York Times reported. . .

The mayor’s office was quick to say that its plan, to be called NYC Care, would not be a substitute for any universal health care at the state level or a national single-payer plan. But, aides said, it was something the city could do immediately and on its own, and not require approval from the State Legislature, which is weighing some form of universal health insurance for New York State.

Indeed, NYC Care would be a mix of insurance and direct spending, and Mr. de Blasio said it would take about two years to get up and running. The city already has a kind of public option for health insurance for low-income New Yorkers, through an insurance plan run by city hospitals and known as MetroPlus.

The NYC Care plan would improve that coverage, which already insures some 516,000 people, and aim to reach more of those who are eligible, such as the young and uninsured, and others who qualify but have not applied.

(Read more from “Coming to a City Near You: Health Care for All (Including Illegal Aliens)” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

White House Preparing ‘Gingerly’ to Replace Ginsburg

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had never missed oral arguments during her tenure on the high court until Monday as the court’s eldest judge continued to recover from surgery to remove cancerous cells from her left lung.

Now, a new report suggests that the White House is quietly preparing for another Supreme Court appointment given the possibility that the 85-year-old Ginsburg’s health could force her to retire. . .

According to the Daily Caller, “gingerly preparations” are underway in the White House counsel’s office in the event that Ginsburg’s Supreme Court departure comes sooner than expected.

“Gingerly preparations are underway, not just for Ginsburg but for any SCOTUS retirement,” a source “directly involved” in the process told the Daily Caller.

Indeed, another source told the outlet that President Donald Trump’s White House and White House counsel Pat Cipollone, remain well-prepared to handle another Supreme Court appointment, given the existing infrastructure inside the West Wing from Trump’s first two high court appointments. (Read more from “White House Preparing ‘Gingerly’ to Replace Ginsburg” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Our Open Border Has Turned Every American City Into a Border Town

Transnational cartels and gangs are fueling violence, death, and drugs not only at our border, but in every community across America. That is the thrust of a new Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) drug threat assessment report: an indictment of open borders, sanctuary cities, and the so-called “criminal justice reform” jailbreak movement.

These cartels and illegal immigration now pose the gravest threats to our public safety. At the same time, because such violence is fueled by foreign nationals and cross-border organizations, it is our most fixable public policy issue if we merely followed our laws on immigration and criminal justice. Today’s drug traffickers are not only killing tens of thousands with the deadliest drugs, they are fueling much of the increased violence in a number of metro areas. Because most of them are foreign nationals, they can and should be deported immediately and deterred from coming back with a border wall and robust interior enforcement. But thanks to the amalgamation of court-driven magnets canceling our immigration laws, sanctuary state policies, and the growing jailbreak movement, the political elites view both drug trafficking and illegal immigration as “low-level” crimes. Consequently, we are needlessly failing to eliminate these grave threats.

It’s no secret that almost all the illicit drugs killing Americans and all of the violence associated with them are coming from the Mexican cartels pouring their poison and personnel over our southern border. However, a more recent trend over the past decade is that the cartels are using transnational gangs operating in our cities as the distributors and enforcers of their criminal activity and are fueling much of the violence all across the country. For a full hour briefing on this issue, listen to my interview with former Texas border official Jaeson Jones.

Here is a summation of the facts from the new DEA threat assessment report:

Mexican TCOs [transnational criminal organizations] continue to control lucrative smuggling corridors, primarily across the SWB [southwest border], and maintain the greatest drug trafficking influence in the United States, with continued signs of growth. They continue to expand their criminal influence by engaging in business alliances with other TCOs, including independent TCOs, and work in conjunction with Transnational Gangs, US based street gangs, prison gangs, and Asian money laundering organizations.

The six cartels identified in the report as the predominant threats are Sinaloa Cartel, Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generation, Juarez Cartel, Gulf Cartel, Los Zetas Cartel, and Beltran-Leyva Organization (BLO).

The distributors for the cartels in our major cities are either cartel associates themselves or Mexican transnational gangs such as MS-13, Nine Trey Gangsters, Mexican Mafia, Norteños, Sureños, and Latin Kings, or, in the Northeast, the Dominican gangs. These networks, according to the DEA, are “overseen by Mexican nationals or U.S. citizens of Mexican origin.” They “enter the United States legally and illegally and often seek to conceal themselves within densely-populated Mexican-American communities.” In the case of the Dominican traffickers, they “conceal their drug trafficking activities behind the cover of established ethnic Dominican communities in various parts of the Northeast,” most notably in communities within New York City and Lawrence, Massachusetts.

Given that so much of the drug trafficking and the associated activities are driven by foreign nationals, it would be easy to break up their networks. They should all be deported at the first sign of trouble. But they’re operating largely within sanctuary jurisdictions. This allows them to operate openly through the politics of the city and continue their “symbiotic, working relationship” to “remain the retail-level drug dealers for the Mexican cartels, often distributing drugs across the country,” according to the DEA.

Thanks to the lack of interior enforcement, the cartels will continue to suck us dry:

Mexican TCOs will continue to grow in the United States through expansion of distribution networks and interaction with local criminal groups and gangs. This relationship will insulate Mexican TCOs from direct ties to street-level drug and money seizures and drug-related arrests made by U.S. law enforcement.

And what about the other violence? It’s not just the 70,000-plus people dying from the drugs of the cartels. They are fueling so much of the increased general crime in our cities and even more rural areas.

Gang members serve multiple roles, including acting as hit men, providing protection, or trafficking illicit drugs back into the United States for sale and distribution. Besides drug trafficking, street gangs near the Southwest Border engage in a multitude of crimes, including weapons trafficking, alien smuggling, human trafficking, prostitution, extortion, robbery, auto theft, assault, murder, racketeering, and money laundering.

And what about the violence we hear about so much in Chicago? The reason there is more violence than usual over the past few years is because of the border, not just the domestic criminals:

The Mexican cartels provide a steady stream of drugs to the Chicago area. Though the Sinaloa Cartel and CJNG are the city’s most notable sources of supply, other Mexican cartels that deliver drugs to the area include BLO, the Gulf Cartel, La Familia Michoacán (LFM), and Los Guerreros Unidos (LGU). Chicago is home to several street gangs that are heavily involved in drug distribution, and collectively these gangs serve as the primary mid-level and retail-level drug distributors for the cartels. These gangs are also responsible for a substantial portion of the city’s violent crime.

This immigration-driven cartel violence and drug trafficking, along with human smuggling, is not only taking place in large cities. Charlotte Cuthbertson of The Epoch Times did a superb expose this week on how several small counties around Greensboro, North Carolina, have become major hubs for “drug trafficking, overdoses, gang and cartel violence, and human trafficking.” What is the cause? All rival gangs working on behalf of the Sinaloa Cartel, all coming from the border. As the Phoenix ICE office reported, 95 percent of those caught in Arizona (which is Sinaloa territory) go to the East Coast.

Some take solace in the fact that this is “merely” cartel-on-cartel violence. But do we really want American to become like Mexico? And do you really think it doesn’t affect the rest of us when this is going on in our communities? Derek Maltz, former head of the DEA’s Special Operations Division, told me that cartel violence on our soil is some of “the most extreme violence” he’s ever seen in our neighborhoods. “To see a photo of a human being wrapped in duct tape and burned to a crisp on the streets of Detroit was an eye-opening experience in understanding the level of violence the cartels use,” said Maltz. He also pointed out that they often get the wrong address of a stash house of rival gangs and wind up torturing completely innocent people to death in a home invasion.

This all stems straight from the border, drug trafficking, and the cartels. As the DEA report observes: “In many of the southernmost states, street gangs, especially the transnational

Hispanic gangs, exploit the Southwest Border, predominantly in California and Texas, traversing into Mexico to work with cartels.”

But it’s not just at the border. The cartel violence is everywhere:

According to the NGR, nearly 40 percent of law enforcement respondents surveyed reported that gangs in their jurisdictions partnered with drug trafficking organizations; generally, the gangs distributed drugs on behalf of the DTOs. The Sureños, Norteños, and Bloods ranked highest as the most active gangs with DTO alliances, while the Sinaloa Cartel had the strongest relationship with gangs throughout the United States.

Which brings us back to jailbreak. After reading this report, you can better appreciate the sophomoric nature of the arguments that we are arresting “low-level drug offenders” who need not be incarcerated and locking them up for years. In fact, anyone peddling this lie is ignorant of the changing dynamics of the drug crisis over the past decade. Look at the websites of almost every U.S. attorney in major cities, and you will see that the people they are arresting on drug charges are all vicious transnational gang members working for the cartels, not just to poison our people, but committing unspeakable violence in our communities, including human and sex trafficking right on our soil. Often, they are picked up on murder charges but are ultimately convicted on drug trafficking, wire fraud, and RICO. Yet under the “Frist Step Act,” which was just signed into law with hardly any debate, all of these people are eligible for early release and front-end sentencing reductions.

Right before Christmas, the U.S. attorney from eastern Virginia, a hot spot for criminal alien activity, announced charges against a Honduran illegal for transporting a 13-year-old for the purpose of sex abuse. Thanks to the immoral policies of the courts, Schumer, and Pelosi, he was incentivized to come here with the very girl he was abusing and used her to obtain the benefit of catch-and-release, whereby he continued to abuse her in Florida and Virginia. He will now be eligible for early release.

Where is any sense of morality in our political class – from the media and “humanitarian” groups to the politicians and religious institutions? Somehow, the very people who have caused and exacerbated the most evil crimes against Americans and helpless migrants are now the ones to dictate to us the non-solution. (For more from the author of “Our Open Border Has Turned Every American City Into a Border Town” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

There’s a National Emergency on the Border, but It’s Not What You Think

During negotiations to end the government shutdown last week, President Trump said he might declare a national emergency over the southern border in order to bypass Congress and build his wall with defense funding. Trump repeated this threat on Sunday, then on Monday morning announced he would address the nation tonight regarding what he called “the Humanitarian and National Security crisis on our Southern Border.”

Do we really have a national emergency on the border, or is Trump just trying to leverage the language of crisis as part of his negotiations with Democrats? Yes and no. There is indeed a crisis on the border, but it’s not what you think.

The crisis is not, as Trump would have us believe, that record numbers of illegal immigrants are entering the country. In fact, the number of illegal immigrants apprehended on the southern border has been declining for nearly two decades, from a high of 1.6 million in 2000 to about a half-million last year. It’s true that the numbers are up relative to 2017, which saw a precipitous decline from 2016, but that increase has mostly consisted of record numbers of families and children coming from Central America seeking asylum.

As recent reports in the Washington Post and The New York Times explain, this surge of Central American families has overwhelmed border facilities that were designed to detain and process primarily single men. Sparse holding cells are now crowded with children, which has proven dangerous. Last month, two Guatemalan children died after being taken into U.S. custody.

So the surge in Central American families—and the administration’s refusal to manage it, opting instead for deterrence—is part of the crisis. But it could be mitigated by adopting different policies for admitting asylum-seekers at ports of entry, allocating more resources to process asylum claims, and hiring more immigration judges along the border, among other things. If they took the situation seriously, Democrats and Republicans might even be able to reach a compromise on all of this, including some funding for a border wall. (Read more from “There’s a National Emergency on the Border, but It’s Not What You Think” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE