Here’s the One Group of Trump Voters Who Regret Their Vote

Americans who voted for Donald Trump after previously voting for Barack Obama in 2012 show more regret about their 2016 votes than any other group.

The report was carried out by the Voter Study Group and surveyed 5,000 American adults over the internet in July.

About 16 percent of so-called “Obama-Trump voters” expressed regrets about their 2016 vote when asked in July 2017, a jump from around 7 percent in December 2016.

Among both Trump voters and Clinton voters in general, the number of people who regret their vote is about the same as of July. (Read more from “Here’s the One Group of Trump Voters Who Regret Their Vote” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

‘Racist’ Trump Accused of Creating Hurricanes to Kill Blacks, Hispanics

Leftists on social media are taking their intense hatred of Donald Trump to a whole new level, accusing the president of manufacturing hurricanes as part of a devious plot to wipe out Hispanic and black Americans.

In a Sept. 4 Facebook post that’s now going viral, a user named Breanna Danielle leveled some serious and wild accusations against the president.

She wrote: “So they say Hurricane Irma is headed for Miami. Did y’all realize 70% of Miami is Latino, Hispanic, or Cuban?? 44% of the Haitian population in the US resides in Miami. Miami is like Houston in which it is FLOURISHING economically. Coincidence? Trump wants them off our land so what better way than to flood them out. Read between the lines people.”

After Facebook users ripped Danielle for suggesting President Trump can manipulate the weather to target specific groups of people, she doubled down: “I stated nothing but facts in this post and this the post [sic] that got y’all being disrespectful on my page for all the late comers.” (Read more from “‘Racist’ Trump Accused of Creating Hurricanes to Kill Blacks, Hispanics” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Southeast Idaho Experiences 140 Earthquakes in Under a Week

People should be prepared for the worst when it comes to the earthquake swarm that’s been shaking Southeast Idaho since Saturday evening . . .

Still, the most alarming scenario is that the earthquake swarm will end with a very destructive 7.0 magnitude earthquake capable of destroying buildings and killing people.

The good news is that the experts say the chance of that happening is very low.

“While we can’t guarantee that there won’t be a larger quake in this area, the possibility is extremely low,” said Shannon Kobs Nawotniak, an Idaho State University geosciences assistant professor who studies earthquakes. “We live in a seismically active area, so everyone should always be up to date on their earthquake safety, just like they would for a fire drill. It is prudent to be prepared, even when the likelihood of the event is very low.”

There have been 141 earthquakes in Southeast Idaho since Saturday evening — all near the Caribou County city of Soda Springs. There were 25 quakes Wednesday, 20 on Tuesday, 28 on Monday, 34 throughout the day on Sunday and 34 on Saturday night. All 141 of the quakes were reported by University of Utah Seismograph Stations. (Read more from “Southeast Idaho Experiences 140 Earthquakes in Under a Week” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Battles Lines Drawn in the Fight for School Choice

It’s looking likely that a school choice bill passed by the Arizona legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Doug Ducey will ultimately be decided by voters in 2018.

Senate Bill 1431, a measure that expands eligibility for students to enroll in a school-voucher program, was passed in April. The bill makes all 1.1 million Arizona students eligible to apply for the state’s Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) — a program in which students in public schools can use a voucher to attend a school of their choice, be it public or private.

Previously, only a select group of students in Arizona were eligible to apply, such as children with disabilities or students enrolled in under-performing schools. The ESA program now gives eligibility to all Arizona students, but it caps actual enrollment to 30,000.

After its passage in the state legislature, however, opposition groups garnered more than enough signatures to block its implementation.

Save Our Schools, an organization formed in resistance to the bill, collected 111,540 signatures to force Senate Bill 1431 to the ballot box. Only 75,321 valid signatures were needed.

Implementation of the measure has been put on hold as the secretary of state’s office checks the validity of the signatures. If the office finds that there are enough valid signatures (which is likely, given the high number submitted), the expansion of the program will be left for voters to decide next year.

Opponents argue the Arizona school system is already underfunded — the state historically ranks very low in terms of student performance — and an expansion of ESA would only siphon more money away from cash-starved schools.

“The fundamental argument is that we’re not adequately funding the education system that we have, that the vast majority of families are using. So let’s not create another way of cutting into that funding until we’ve solved that,” said Dawn Penich Thacker, the communications director of Save Our Schools Arizona.

Thacker spoke to Western Journalism about why her group is against the expansion of ESA and what needs to be done to fix the Arizona school system.

“Our main issue was that this was not a collaborative process. One movement got to have its say. So Save Our Schools Arizona wants to back away from that, put it to the voters and then say ‘let’s start over.’ What will help education in Arizona? It will probably be a hybrid of things. It will probably be a mix of choice options, public education and who knows what else. But let’s have that conversation,” she said.

“It’s hard to improve if you’re broke. Our schools are no different.”

Thacker pointed out that despite Arizona families having “choice” options, the vast majority of them choose public schools for their children. She believes if the bill is put into the hands of voters, they will ultimately choose to vote down an expansion of ESA.

“Voters want a strong education system that is built in. Ninety-five percent of Arizona families, even though we are a choice state, are still choosing public options.”

Thacker said she was caught off guard by the amount of private and home school family volunteers petitioning against ESA expansion.

These unlikely opponents of the measure told her that its implementation would lead to the type of regulation that they tried to get away from in the public system. Accepting voucher money from the government would, in their eyes, eventually take away choice.

They believe this particular law would take away the freedom that they get with current school choice options.

“Whenever you take something from the government, there are going to be strings attached,” Thacker warned.

But there are many supporters of ESA expansion who do not see it this way.

“The number of dollars that would be affected by this change, while it’s an important change, is still pretty narrow. This is almost a pilot program. It’s capped at just a few thousand kids who are going to be able to take advantage of it. In a state this size, giving these sorts of ESA options to a few thousand kids, is not a significant shift of dollars away from public schools,” said Kory Langhofer, an attorney for the Goldwater Institute.

The Goldwater Institute filed a lawsuit over the attempt to delay the program’s expansion. The conservative think tank believes school choice empowers families and students, and it argues that halting the program’s implementation is putting the education of Arizona children in limbo.

“What this bill does is if your kid is not getting a proper education, it gives you a chance to fix that. It gets your kid into a better school where they can learn to be successful,” Langhofer told Western Journalism.

Langhofer said Arizona children can’t wait 18 months for a 2018 voter referendum (what would take place if the signatures collected by Save Our Schools are deemed valid).

“The reason people are opposing the referendum is because if your kid is in a bad school right now and you need to get them a better education, you can’t afford to wait 18 months for that. The bill can be put on hold, but your kid’s third-grade education can’t be put on hold,” Langhofer said.

Currently, the ESA program is only available for a select group of Arizona students. Langhofer pointed out that these students are in the best position to say whether it works, and he argued they approve.

“The families who are using the program are in the best position to say whether it’s helping them and they seem to happy. They continue to stay in the program.”

Langhofer and other supporters of school choice support the bill that was passed by the Arizona legislature. He believes Gov. Ducey has done a good job in tackling education issues.

“Fixing education is not easy. It’s extremely expensive. I think it’s the biggest line item in the state’s budget and if you’re going to make meaningful changes that large and run by bureaucracy, it’s difficult to turn the ship. The changes he (Ducey) made have been good for education, good for school choice.”

If and when the decision to expand school choice is left to the citizens of Arizona, Langhofer is expecting a tough campaign for the hearts and minds of the state’s voters. (For more from the author of “Battles Lines Drawn in the Fight for School Choice” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

California City Will Pay Gang Members to Remain Peaceful

This isn’t a satire on ultra-liberal California.

FOX News 40 reports: “After a violent weekend of suspected gang-related shootings, Tuesday the Sacramento City Council took action to reduce the bloodshed.”

“It approved a controversial program called Advance Peace, which offers cash stipends to gang members who remain peaceful.”

“The program targets key gang agitators, offering them cash stipends to graduate [from] school and remain peaceful…But the city would still have to pay half the cost of the program, $1.5 million out of the city’s general fund.”

In other words, Sacramento, the capital city of the state of California, has surrendered.

Investigations, arrests, prosecutions, and prison sentences won’t cut it.

Here is the scenario that comes to mind. A suburban teenager on the outskirts of the city shows up in his parents’ living room one day with the tattoo of a grinning skull on his neck.

“Don’t be upset,” he says. “I’m joining a gang. I’ll still get good grades in school, but when I graduate, the city will give me a cash prize. I can use the money to start my own tech firm in our garage…”

But this is piddling stuff. Let’s go all the way to Governor Jerry Brown’s office. Let’s have a state-wide “advance peace” program. The state, which is already $500 billion in debt, when you add in unfunded future liabilities, could throw a billion dollars into a pool.

Over a period of, say, five years, the money would be doled out to gangs, based on their performance. Subtract $250,000 for every gang killing in the state, $125,000 for every wounding, $10,000 for every property crime, $1000 for every drug bust. Whatever is left over for the gangs is their gravy.

Eventually, through negotiation, replace the California legislature and governor with gang members. Let them run things.

I’m just trying to be helpful. I see the direction policy is taking, and I want to give it a boost and quicken the pace.

After all, when gang members end up taking over the state government, all gang crime would cease.

It would be reclassified as government corruption.

Pop the champagne corks. Problem solved. (For more from the author of “California City Will Pay Gang Members to Remain Peaceful” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Meet the Secret CIA-Funded Group Behind the ‘War on Terror’

Bilderberg has gained a reputation as the world’s most secretive group of billionaires and political leaders who conspire to impact global events—but reports indicate that they don’t hold a candle to another group that includes a host of war criminals responsible for the “War on Terror.”

The group is named Le Cercle. In a report dated Sept. 13, 1982, the German publication Der Spiegel describes it as a “legal cartel” made up of “loyal Bundesnachrichtendienst agents, foreign intelligence agents, reactionary politicians and ultra-right journalists” who played a crucial role in the 1980 election.

The existence of the group was revealed by Bavarian constitutional protector Hans Langemann. According to the report, he described the group as:

“In the case of CERCLE, which is clearly defamatory,” as far as my earlier knowledge of the BND “and my present knowledge are concerned, a “loose” “concentration “about two times a year and at various” places of conservative- anti-Communist politician,” “publicists, bankers, and VIPs of other professions,” “which originated in the former French Prime Minister Antoine PINAY, and the circle to which guests are invited continues to this day.”

Former U.S. Defense Secretary and President of the World Bank Paul Wolfowitz, former Iraqi Coalition Provisional Authority Leader Paul Bremer, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and former Chairman of the Defense Department’s Defense Policy Board Richard Perle—some of the most notable neoconservative architects of the Iraq War—are all reportedly members.

Other reported American members of Le Cercle include former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, former Directors of Central Intelligence Bill Casey and William Colby, and former President Richard Nixon after he left the White House.

In a report from The Independent dated June 28, 1997, the “exclusive think-tank said to be funded by the CIA” is mentioned because its chairman at the time, former Member of Parliament Jonathan Aitken, was reportedly going to be removed over a libel trial that ultimately sent him to prison for perjury.

Accusations that Le Cercle receives funding from the CIA have been made by Robin Ramsay, editor of Lobster Magazine; and by John E Lewis, author of The Mammoth Book of Cover-Ups.

As the report noted, “the group’s existence is only occasionally disclosed” following its creation in the 1950s:

Cercle was intended to cement Franco-German relations, as a buffer to Soviet aggression during the Cold War. Down the years, however, it has become much more, advocating right-wing causes round the world and growing into a confidential talking shop for about 70 politicians, businessmen, polemicists and personnel from the diplomatic and security services. Members are invited to attend its meetings; they cannot ask to be admitted, and as a condition of attending they agree to keep all sessions secret. It meets twice a year, once in Washington DC in the autumn and once in the early part of the year in an ‘overseas’ venue.

The Independent described senior member Brian Crozier as an “author and well-known Cold-Warrior with close ties to MI6 and the CIA” who wrote a “planning paper” for Le Cercle in 1979. In addition to securing changes of government in Germany and the United Kingdom (where Margaret Thatcher became Prime Minister in 1979), the agenda included objectives such as:

“Undercover financial transactions for political aims”
“International campaigns aiming to discredit hostile personalities or events”
“Creation of a (private) intelligence service specializing in a selective point of view”
“Establishment of offices under suitable cover each run by a coordinator from the central office. Current plans cover London, Washington, Paris, Munich and Madrid”

In a report on the history of Le Cercle, British news source True Publica noted that the 1982 Langemann Papers were “the first significant leak to expose the activities of Le Cercle, confirming that the group was actively involved in influencing Western European elections.”

Its purpose is to subvert the democratic principles and processes of individual countries and are by nature ideologically ‘hawkish’ – distributing propaganda, stoking fear of communist plots from Russia, vote rigging and hacking the accounts of politicians and prominent global figures. Promoting the ‘war on terror’ has been a major factor in their activities of recent years and in so doing broker weapons deals and setting up false flag operations the world over to suit its own agenda.

While the majority of the information surrounding Le Cercle is covert and secretive—especially regarding its activity in recent years—one of the most important things to remember about the think tank is that its presence is well-documented, its members include influential U.S. politicians, there have been accusations of funding by the CIA, and yet mainstream media in the United States has ignored its existence and influence for decades. (For more from the author of “Meet the Secret CIA-Funded Group Behind the ‘War on Terror'” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Crowd Throws Tomatoes at Merkel During Rally

German Chancellor Angela Merkel was hit with a tomato Tuesday during a rally in the southern college town of Heidelberg, news agency Deutsche Presse Agentur reports.

Police said two tomatoes were thrown during different times of Merkel’s speech. One tomato hit the chancellor’s left hip. A representative for Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) was also hit. DPA reports that Merkel kept the same outfit on for a television appearance hours later.

Some 3,000 people showed up to the rally. The crowd was primarily made up of Merkel supporters and CDU, but some attendees chanted “hypocrite” and “liar” throughout her speech.

“If we made a mistake, then it wasn’t in taking in people, but rather that we didn’t pay attention to the fact that people in Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey and Syria didn’t have enough to eat, weren’t getting an education and put themselves into the hands of people smugglers,” Merkel said in defense of her decision to open doors to migrants in 2015. (Read more from “Crowd Throws Tomatoes at Merkel During Rally” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Governor in U.S. Virgin Islands Orders Gun Grab

A hurricane is on the way, and preparations always include boarding up windows, stocking up on food, water and batteries, and sometimes fleeing inland.

A governor in one U.S. territory, however, has another plan: Grab all the guns.

According to the Daily Caller, the governor of the Virgin Islands, a U.S. territory, has signed an order to that effect.

The order explains that Gov. Kenneth E. Mapp authorized the territory’s adjutant general “to mobilize such units of the National Guard as are necessary to maintain or restore public order, and to guarantee the safety of life and property,” as Hurricane Irma approaches from the Atlantic.

The adjutant general, he said, “is authorized and directed to seize arms, ammunition, explosives, incendiary material and any other property that may be required by the military forces for the performance of this emergency mission, in accordance with the Rules of Force promulgated by the Virgin Islands National Guard and approved by the Virgin Islands Department of Justice.” (Read more from “Governor in U.S. Virgin Islands Orders Gun Grab” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Sessions Announces End of Special Protections for Illegal Aliens

Attorney General Jeff Sessions Tuesday announced that the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival policy, which gave temporary amnesty to thousands of illegal immigrants brought into the U.S. as children, will come to an end under the Trump administration.

“I’m here today to announce that the program known as DACA that was effectuated under the Obama administration is being rescinded,” Sessions announced at the Justice Department.

President Obama created DACA by executive order in 2012 after Congress refused to pass legislation on immigration reform. In public remarks made in 2011, Obama himself indicated it was not within his constitutional power as president to unilaterally create laws that would shield illegals from deportation and grant them work permits. But one year later he did exactly that . . .

Session blasted Obama for abusing executive power to grant amnesty to thousands of illegals.

“The policy was implemented unilaterally to great controversy and legal concern after Congress rejected legislative proposals to extend similar benefits on numerous occasions to this same group of illegal aliens,” the attorney general said. “In other words, the executive branch through DACA deliberately sought to achieve what the legislative branch specifically refused to authorize on multiple occasions. Such an open ended circumvention of our immigration laws was an unconstitutional exercise of authority by the executive branch.” (Read more from “Sessions Announces End of Special Protections for Illegal Aliens” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Intelligence Committees Heavily Rely on Former Spies

Lawmakers assigned to oversee the sprawling U.S. intelligence apparatus rely strongly on a staff that in recent years has included scores of onetime spooks, analysts and lawyers who previously worked at the spy agencies under scrutiny.

According to a comprehensive analysis by McClatchy, at least one-third, and perhaps far more, of the professional staff members who carry out the work of the House and Senate intelligence committees are themselves veterans of the agencies that the two panels oversee.

That reliance raises questions about how effectively the two oversight committees carry out supervision of a swelling intelligence empire that now employs some 107,000 people with a combined budget projected to reach $78.4 billion next year.

Some national security experts see little problem as long as the spy agencies thwart any repeat of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks – and so far, the agencies have succeeded. Their triumphs are secret, and largely unheralded. (Read more from “Intelligence Committees Heavily Rely on Former Spies” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.