Two High-Level Government Child Trafficking Rings Busted and American Media Is Silent

/1 Comment/in , , /by

In late 2016, the government’s spin machine made it a point to feature “pizza gate,” only to mock anyone who would ever believe it to be true. The thought that high-level government officials in the U.S. would or could ever be involved in sex-trafficking or pedophilia was presented as far-fetched conspiracy theory, only believed by the fringe elements of society. But as The Free Thought Project has reported on numerous occasions, pedophilia involving high-level government officials is becoming the norm rather than the exception.

In the North Bengal region of India, a child welfare officer, India’s equivalent of a Child Protective Services official was arrested for her role in a child-trafficking ring. Sasmita Ghosh’s arrest makes the seventh as of late. The State’s Criminal Investigative Department (CID) made the arrests. According to The Hindu, “The CID had unearthed the child trafficking racket during raids at homes and nursing homes in Baduria area of North 24 Parganas district, in Behala in the southern fringes of Kolkata and some other parts of south Bengal in November last year.”

Abortion clinics in the area were convincing mothers to give birth to their children in exchange for money ranging between $1,400 and $4,500 USD. Other birthing centers told mothers their children were stillborn, when they weren’t, allowing the clinic to steal the babies for sale on the black market. The children were transported in bread baskets to nursing homes in the area where they would remain until they were sold into servitude, as sex slaves, or brothels.

“It is a huge network of NGOs, nursing homes, doctors and middlemen dealing in illegal adoption and baby trafficking that the police have busted. Our men are now building on the huge leads they have already got in this case,” Rajesh Kumar, CID’s Additional Director General told the press. Additionally, investigators believe foreigners were buying the children. Currency from other countries was found at the same time the children were discovered. Several corpses and skeletons of infants were also unearthed in the raided businesses.

Child trafficking is on the rise in the U.S. In 2006, a woman living in North Carolina, Mercedes Farquharson, fled the country when it was discovered she’d been using two young girls as house slaves, forced to farm the land, and do all the household chores, along with cooking and cleaning. In 2009, she was arrested in Bulgaria, where she’d fled to escape justice.

The trafficking of children isn’t limited to lowly child-protective service workers either. Hama Amadou, an opposition leader in the Sahel state of Niger was sentenced to one year in prison for providing babies to Niger’s elite society. “Prosecutors claim that Amadou was one of a group of people accused of smuggling babies from Nigeria via Benin to wealthy couples in Niger by falsely claiming the parenthood of around 30 children,” according to Deutsche Welle (DW), Germany’s international newsgroup. Childlessness is Niger is looked down upon, so one way the elitists solved their own infertility problem was to take someone else’s child as their own.

DW described what happened after they acquired a child, “At the turn of the last decade, Niger’s elite went through a baby boom. Women who had been childless for years were suddenly celebrating the birth of their first child.” The miraculous blessings of motherhood reportedly came at the expense of someone else’s presumably stolen, purchased, or seized baby. Amadou was tried in absentia and his lawyer says the allegations are politically motivated.

Closer to home, Child Protective Services, as TFTP has consistently reported, is authorized to kidnap children at will, and place those children in foster care homes. The government’s own agency charged with protecting children, routinely displaces babies, children, and adolescents away from their parents in order to supposedly protect those children.

Many of those same CPS workers are abusers as well, who sometimes place those kidnapped children in the homes of sexual predators, where they are routinely victimized. The terrorist organization evokes fear in the hearts of so many parents. The power CPS possesses is legally unmatched in all of society. If you’d like to peruse our archives of CPS articles, you can do so by clicking here. Children are being ripped from their parents for something as innocent and well-intentioned as homeschooling.

If child trafficking arrests of government officials can happen around the world, why is it so far-fetched to think it cannot and does not happen here in the U.S.? The reality of the situation is that it is not at all far-fetched and even admitted. But the American spin machine is able to make anyone who talks about it look like a crazy person. The problem is getting so large, however, these sickos are having a hard time keeping it under wraps. As the Free Thought Project previously reported, former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney says if they government actually investigated it, child trafficking would destroy both Democrats and Republicans. (For more from the author of “Two High-Level Government Child Trafficking Rings Busted and American Media Is Silent” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Says He Will Submit Evidence of Wiretapping to House Committee ‘Very Soon’

/0 Comments/in , /by

President Trump discussed his tweeted accusation that President Obama ordered “wires” at Trump Tower tapped during last year’s presidential campaign in an exclusive interview with Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight” Wednesday.

Trump told host Tucker Carlson that the administration “will be submitting things” to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence “very soon.” The president added that he “will be, perhaps speaking about this next week” and predicted that “you’re going to find some very interesting items coming to the forefront over the next 2 weeks.”

When asked by Carlson why he tweeted about the alleged phone tap before producing evidence, Trump said his definition of wiretapping “covers a lot of different things.”

“That really covers surveillance and many other things. Nobody ever talks about the fact that [the words ‘wires tapped’] was in quotes [in the tweet], but that’s a very important thing.”

Trump defended his ongoing use of social media while in office, saying that “maybe I wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for Twitter, because I get such a fake press, such a dishonest press. (Read more from “Trump Says He Will Submit Evidence of Wiretapping to House Committee ‘Very Soon'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Hawaii Sues Trump Admin for Discrimination … but Have They Checked the Mirror?

/0 Comments/in , /by

Nate Madden of Conservative Review has outlined the problems with the latest lawsuit filed by Hawaii against President Donald Trump’s revised immigration order temporarily suspending entry from six terrorist safe havens. (Arguments are being held today in federal court.) But watching the attorney general of Hawaii, Doug Chin, condemn President Donald Trump’s revised immigration order as “blatantly discriminatory” was quite ironic, given that Hawaii is the home of a state government that constantly engages in blatant racial and ethnic discrimination.

Contrary to Chin’s outrageous claim, Trump’s new order does not discriminate against anyone, whether based on race or religion. Although Chin accused the administration of issuing an order designed to divide people into “a superior race,” it is Hawaii that blatantly discriminates to divide Hawaiian residents and create a “superior race” of Hawaiians entitled to special loans, low cost housing, and other privileges.

The state government has a special “Office of Hawaiian Affairs” (OHA). As its own website says, the OHA awards scholarship money to “Native Hawaiians,” as well as loans to “start businesses, improve homes, consolidate debts, and continue their education.” It also gives out grants and leases out land at very special, low rates to “Native Hawaiians.” To qualify, you have to prove you are a “descendant of not less than one-half part of the blood of the races inhabiting the Hawaiian Islands previous to 1778” according to the Hawaiian Home Commission Act. As Peter Kirsanow, a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, says, this is no different than the “odious ‘one drop rule’ contained in the racial-segregation codes of the 19th and early 20th centuries.”

In a highly critical 2005 report on the proposed Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act, the Civil Rights Commission said that Hawaii “is in a league by itself” when it comes to officially sanctioned discriminatory conduct. Hawaii has some nerve claiming that the revised executive order “differentiates between people based on their … national origin.” That is something the Hawaiian government does every day — differentiate between people based on their origin and whether they can trace their bloodlines back to 1778.

Attorney General Doug Chin should put his own house in order before he starts accusing President Trump of discrimination. He would be better off suing his own state government to stop its flagrant discrimination and its division of Hawaiian residents into two separate classes, one of which is given special privileges not available to anyone else. (For more from the author of “Hawaii Sues Trump Admin for Discrimination … but Have They Checked the Mirror?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Will the Establishment Reps Abandoning RINOcare Spell Its Defeat?

/0 Comments/in , /by

Is RINOcare DOA? It sure looks like it.

House Republican leadership has been putting the squeeze on conservative members to toe the party line on health care reform. Speaker Paul Ryan has characterized support for the current legislation as a “binary choice” between repealing Obamacare or keeping the law forever.

“This is the closest we will ever get to repealing and replacing Obamacare,” he said. “It really comes down to a binary choice.”

Well, after the Congressional Budget Office released its report on the American Health Care Act (AHCA), now it’s the moderates and progressive Republicans who are threatening to kill the bill.

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) declared Tuesday she would vote “No” on the AHCA, based on the liberal “uninsured” argument.

Rep. Leonard Lance (R-N.J.) said he believes the bill will likely fail in the Senate, which gives him an excuse not to vote for it in the House. “I do not want to vote on a bill that has no chance of passing over in the Senate,” Lance said this week. “The CBO score has modified the dynamics.” And then there’s Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Penn.), who blamed conservatives for pushing RINOcare too far to the right by demanding a rollback of Medicaid expansion.

Over on the Senate side, Bill Cassidy (R-La.) is accusing President Trump of breaking his promise on health care reform. Not because the Republican plan does not fully repeal Obamacare, but rather because the recent CBO estimate that 24 million will lose their insurance by 2026 under the American Health Care Act. “That’s not what President Trump promised,” Cassidy told CNN. “That’s not what Republicans ran on.”

The Republican Party needs 51 votes in the Senate to send the reconciliation repeal bill to President Trump’s desk. If three Republicans defect, the bill dies. Senators Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), and Mike Lee (R-Utah) oppose the bill because they believe it does not go far enough to repeal Obamacare’s treacherous policies. Vice President Mike Pence told Conservative Review Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin Tuesday that conservative amendments were expected to be added to the legislation to make it more palatable.

But when you consider how Republican moderates think the bill already goes too far, things look bleak for the American Health Care Act in the U.S. Senate.

What is the GOP to do? Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) suggests that if the party can’t come to a consensus, they should leave Obamacare alone, to implode all its own.

President Trump has also floated this idea. “Let it be a disaster,” Trump told state governors recently, explaining his Plan B in the health care fight. “[B]ecause we can blame that on the Dems that are in our room, and we can blame that on the Democrats and President Obama.”

Trump can certainly blame Obama and the Democrats for the collapse of the health insurance market. But those criticisms won’t be as effectual as he believes, because the Democrats are out of power. Republicans hold Congress and the White House now; voters expect them to act. They want promises of full repeal delivered on. RINOcare does not keep Republican promises.

The GOP is well and truly caught between a rock and a hard place. If they make the bill more conservative with amendments, more progressive Republicans will bolt. If they water down the bill further, conservatives won’t vote for it.

If Republicans want to save face, they should take the Freedom Caucus’ lead — take up and vote on the 2015 full repeal bill that every Republican previously voted for. Senator Mike Lee made such a case at The Daily Signal this week, noting the 2015 bill has already cleared the “Byrd rule” hurdle. So, if Republicans were actually serious about repealing Obamacare in 2015, this bill should fly through Congress straight to President Trump’s desk now.

That is, if Republicans were actually serious about repealing Obamacare. (For more from the author of “Will the Establishment Reps Abandoning RINOcare Spell Its Defeat?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

House Intel Committee Seeks Names of Obama Officials Who Requested ‘Unmasking’ of Americans Picked up on Surveillance

/0 Comments/in , /by

The leaders of the House Intelligence Committee asked the three leaders of the intelligence community Wednesday about any time during the last seven months of the Obama administration whenever any of its agents and officials improperly named, or “unmasked,” and disseminated the identities of American citizens picked up in intelligence collection.

Chairman Devin Nunes, R-California, and Ranking Member Rep. Adam Schiff, D-California, wrote that they were concerned that members of the intelligence community have not been sufficiently honoring previously established “robust ‘minimization procedures'” to protect the identities of US citizens, including “masking” their names. The letter they sent refers to the disclosure to the public that former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn had several conversations with the Russian Ambassador.

The matter is relevant not only because of the House Intelligence Committee’s responsibility to conduct oversight of the intelligence community, but also as it may relate to surveillance of Russians known to US intelligence or any others who may have spoken with any advisers or individuals around then-candidate Donald Trump. (Read more from “House Intel Committee Seeks Names of Obama Officials Who Requested ‘Unmasking’ of Americans Picked up on Surveillance” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Loretta Lynch and Preet Bharara: The Left’s New Plaster Saints

/0 Comments/in , /by

As I was watching the video of Loretta Lynch, the nation’s former chief law enforcement office, darkly suggesting we might be in for a time when rights are rolled back and the appropriate response might once again include marching, bleeding, and even dying for her cause I had two reactions:

First, with mobs, including students, attacking scholars and property at Berkeley and Middlebury, what could she be thinking?

Second, what office is she running for?

Saint Loretta Lynch

Senate Democrats loved the rhetoric enough to post it on their website. Lynch’s deft emotional identification with the angry leftist mob, without quite endorsing anyone’s actions, or any policy in particular, struck me as politically adroit — the hallmark of an aspiring Democrat politician in the age of Trump.

But if Lynch is running for president in 2020 or senator from New York in 2018 (primarying Kirsten Gillenbrand in the safe Democratic seat?), she’s likely to have company: meet the latest leftist secular saint in Preet Bharara, former U.S. attorney from New York — who tweeted his way to fame this week by boasting that he was fired after refusing to resign.

Preet Bharara, “Sheriff” of Wall Street

How breathlessly CNN described the man: “Preet Bharara has reached that lofty pantheon of fame where it seems everyone knows him by just his first name.” Well, everyone whom CNN knows, anyway.

Our friend Preet, is a “rock star prosecutor” and “scourge of Wall Street corruption, gangs, terrorists and cyber criminals” and “the most high profile U.S. Attorney in the nation” and “the Sheriff of Wall Street” with “an innovative personality that shook up the sometimes stuffy world of the law,” as well as a “crusading prosecutor.”

If Preet were really the Sheriff of Wall Street, why did almost nobody responsible for the financial crisis go to jail?

The Obama administration adroitly waited until the 2012 election to showily announce it was going after Wall Street — after the five year criminal statute of limitation had passed. This was perhaps out of a doctrine, elucidated in 1999 by none other than the future Attorney General Eric Holder.

Prosecuting bankers who have committed crimes is hard. Collecting settlements you can wave before voters or CNN reporters as the stuff of legend is pretty easy, as William D. Cohan points out:

Since 2009, 49 financial institutions have paid various government entities and private plaintiffs nearly $190 billion in fines and settlements, according to an analysis by the investment bank Keefe, Bruyette & Woods. That may seem like a big number, but the money has come from shareholders, not individual bankers.

How big a punishment did the Sheriff of Wall Street and his Justice department amici really deal out? Let’s put it this way: “In early 2014, just weeks after Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan Chase, settled out of court with the Justice Department, the bank’s board of directors gave him a 74 percent raise, bringing his salary to $20 million.”

Meanwhile, if Preet was a sheriff, his biggest legacy is prosecuting so-called “insider trading” deals during the recession — threatening and jailing investors for uncertain, vague regulatory crimes, which shut down a key component of economic growth: knowledgeable investing.

The entire government response to the financial crisis in terms of wrongdoing has been episodic, vague and irrational, favoring hedge fund black box algorithms over the depth knowledge that directs money to where it can grow. This is what George Gilder has called the “outsider trading scandal,” part of The Scandal of Money.

Christian conservatives are very lucky that the Democratic party has linked its deep dedication to identity politics and social radicalism (including LGBT, race and gender) to a failed economic agenda. That linkage has given the rule of law a second shot, if only the Republican party had the guts to pass legislation to protect the livelihoods of its voters from Democratic misrule.

Meanwhile, look to New York once again for the future of the Democratic party, in which social justice warriors of all colors square off in defense of their core values, without a real agenda for progress.

The Loretta Lynch Video

I deliberately linked to the Snopes.com version of the Loretta Lynch video because many conservative websites’ versions claimed Lynch actually called for bloodletting. Not really. But hers was still astonishingly inflammatory rhetoric for a former attorney general, rife with claims of “our rights being assailed, being trampled on, even being rolled back,” and implied praise for protesters’ actions:

It has been people — individuals — who have banded together. Ordinary people, who simply saw what needed to be done and came together and supported those ideals, who have made the difference. They’ve marched, they’ve bled. Yes, some of them have died. This is hard. Every good thing is. We have done this before, we can do this again.

The fantasy that conservatives, or most Trump supporters, are violent racists fuels this kind of rhetoric. It feeds the gathering forces of hatred in which people with cultural and economic privilege are defining their opposition as Nazis — against whom violence is understandable if not quite right, as I wrote before. David Duke has never been more powerful. It is the power granted earlier to Fred Phelps, the late heretical cult leader (Westboro Baptist) whose message that “God hates f**s” was irresistibly useful to the mainstream media which wanted to tar all opposition with that broad, ugly brush.

On March 6, without any word from Lynch on what she actually meant, Snopes went to bat with the claim that she praised only black civil rights heroes who suffered in the past, not rioters who committed violence in Ferguson or Berkeley or Middlebury.

On March 6, Snopes.com had not received any response from Loretta Lynch. On March 14, I checked in again to make sure: still no response. Loretta Lynch has no desire to correct or clarify the record apparently.

Is it because such a clarification would not please the hard Left’s newfound praise for violence against anyone they dub a white nationalist? (For more from the author of “Loretta Lynch and Preet Bharara: The Left’s New Plaster Saints” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

U.S. Army Creates World’s First 3D Printed Grenade Launcher

/0 Comments/in , /by

The last thing you would expect is for the US military to create a 3D printed gun. After all, you’d think that an organization as large and well funded as our military wouldn’t need plastic guns. 3D printers are for people who don’t have massive factories at their disposal, but the Army has the military-industrial complex.

Nonetheless, the US Army recently revealed that they have created a 3D printed grenade launcher, which they have appropriately dubbed RAMBO or Rapid Additively Manufactured Ballistics Ordnance. It was designed by the Army Research, Development, and Engineering Command and the U.S. Army Manufacturing Technology Program.

RAMBO contains only 50 parts, and with the exception of a few springs and fasteners, is all 3D printed. However, not all of these pieces are plastic. The barrel and receiver are aluminum, and were printed by a metal sintering machine. The Army is also working on printing the 40mm ammunition that goes with the weapon. Early tests show that the weapon functions, and now the Army is testing its reliability under long-term use.

So why does the army want to build 3D printed weapons in the first place? They don’t explicitly say, but RAMBO and its ammo was designed and produced in 6 months, which is far shorter than what it would take to create a new weapon from scratch using traditional channels in the arms industry.

The Army probably doesn’t intend to actually deploy this prototype weapon. One could only guess, but it’s more likely that they are prototyping the concept of designing their own weapons. The research and development phase of any weapon is notoriously long and expensive, so by doing that part themselves they could skirt around the arms industry and save a ton of money.

The only question is, will the military-industrial complex abide this money saving measure? (For more from the author of “U.S. Army Creates World’s First 3D Printed Grenade Launcher” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

94 Years in Prison for Reporting Federal Abuse? More Fall Out From Standoff in Burns, Oregon

/0 Comments/in , , /by

A flurry of dramatic property and civil rights-related trials is taking place across the western U.S. in federal courts, in which defendants, including independent media representatives, are charged with up to 17 crimes each, from trespass to terrorism. . .

The initial trial for seven of the Oregon protestors took place in the fall of 2016, and ended with a surprising “not guilty” verdict for all defendants – including ringleaders Ryan and Ammon Bundy. At the time, the Obama administration admitted that federal officials were “rattled by the Oregon verdict.” Federal prosecutors have since added new charges for some defendants, which will not be eligible for jury trials. . .

Among the 32 defendants are a disturbing number of writers, bloggers and video teams. And although journalism certainly isn’t cited as a crime, many charges appear to hinge on the motivation, speech and political beliefs of the “journalist” defendants. [They face up to 94 years in prison under the 1996 Anti-terrorism Act] Dozens who gathered at either place were informed they were considered “unindicted co-conspirators.”

Comparing media members who face charges with those who are not, the major difference appears to hinge on expressions of support for the “occupation’s” organizers or their causes . . .

Possibly a quarter of the protestors at Burns considered themselves de facto broadcasters at some point of the occupation. Prosecution challenged some defendants who claimed media status, asking for press credentials or credits. Yet alternative and social media are almost impossible to categorize this way. This arguably dilutes the immunity the press enjoys under the First Amendment, but is part of a larger issue now playing out as technology, the Internet and especially social media revolutionize the traditional meaning of “news” and “journalist.” (Read more from “94 Years in Prison for Reporting Federal Abuse? More Fall out From Standoff in Burns, Oregon” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Assange: Clinton Conspiring With Deep State to Oust Trump for a ‘Pence Takeover’

/0 Comments/in , , /by

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange suggested on Twitter Tuesday Hillary Clinton and certain unnamed members of the U.S. Intelligence Community are plotting a takeover by Vice President Mike Pence.

“Clinton stated privately this month that she is quietly pushing for a Pence takeover,” Assange tweeted. “She stated that Pence is predictable hence defeatable.”

“Two IC officials close to Pence stated privately this month that they are planning on a Pence takeover,” he added in another tweet. “Did not state if Pence agrees.”

Further, he continued, “By handing unilateral power to the CIA over its drone strikes at this time White House signals that bullying, disloyalty & incompetence pays.”

In response to shocked reactions to the tweets, Pence lambasted Assange’s suggestion of a takeover as “absurd” and “frankly offensive” in an interview with radio host Laura Ingraham, asserting,

I would find all of that dialogue to be absurd and frankly offensive. It is the greatest honor of my life to serve shoulder-to-shoulder with the 45th President of the United States. To see his leadership every day, to see the compassion that he has for the American people every day. I would dismiss that out of hand and tell you that I’m just, I’m so excited about the progress that we’ve been made strengthening this country, protecting this country, reviving this country’s economy and all credit goes to President Donald Trump.

Although Assange did not make immediately apparent the reason for the tweets or sources for the information, The Daily Caller suggested, “Assange’s claims appear to come in response to reports that President Trump authorized the CIA to perform drone strikes on terrorists Monday evening.”

To wit, The Wall Street Journal reported last night,

“President Donald Trump has given the Central Intelligence Agency secret new authority to conduct drone strikes against suspected terrorists, U.S. officials said, changing the Obama administration’s policy of limiting the spy agency’s paramilitary role and reopening a turf war between the agency and the Pentagon.

The new authority, which hadn’t been previously disclosed, represents a significant departure from a cooperative approach that had become standard practice by the end of former President Barack Obama’s tenure: The CIA used drones and other intelligence resources to locate suspected terrorists and then the military conducted the actual strike. The U.S. drone strike that killed Taliban leader Mullah Mansour in May 2016 in Pakistan was the best example of that hybrid approach, U.S. officials said.

For some time, rumors claimed the aptly-named Deep State has been scheming to oust Trump should he not align sufficiently with the renewed Red Scare so vociferously championed by former President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Allowing what, in essence, constitutes the broad gift of power and militancy back to an agency whose wings were clipped by the previous administration, could present those Deep State players with additional urgency if there indeed exists a plot to install Pence.

Zero Hedge handily summarized what this coup brewing behind Washington D.C.’s curtains could entail for the rest of us:

No matter what one makes of Trump – or his administration and the policies that have been initiated thus far – the fact remains that Trump won the U.S. election. The people working behind the scenes to oust him are not subject to democratic controls, nor are they working in the best interests of the American public. We are left to ask ourselves exactly how renewing relations with Russia – a nuclear power – could possibly endanger American lives.

Either way, we are more or less left with two paths ahead of us. The first path involves Trump giving in and adopting an anti-Russian agenda, as is already apparent in his decision to send more ground troops to Syria alongside Saudi troops, who will intentionally oppose the Syrian regime (a close ally of Russia). The second involves the possibility of another direct coup within the Trump administration, this time one that may ultimately force Trump out of the White House so he can be replaced by Mike Pence, a war hawk who will be more than happy to do the job Hillary Clinton wanted to do.

It was less than one month ago, on February 15, that Assange hinted of a seeming surreptitious Battle Royale, tweeting, “Amazing battle for dominance is playing out between the elected US govt & the IC who consider themselves to be the ‘permanent government’.”

As The Free Thought Project reported in February,

John Schindler, a former professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College, who spent nearly a decade with the super-secret National Security Agency as an intelligence analyst and counterintelligence officer — and who still maintains deep connections to the intelligence community — readily admitted that senior elements of the intelligence community (IC) are engaging in treason against Trump.

Schneider tweeted, “Now we go nuclear. IC war going to new levels. Just got an EM fm senior IC friend, it began: ‘He will die in jail.’”

Whether or not the ultimate war for control of the flailing American empire is actually taking place, indications the political establishment is on the verge of all-out rebellion have been apparent for some time.

Perhaps Julian Assange knows something the rest of us don’t — or, at least, not yet.

Notably, only a minute percentage of Vault 7 documents — WikiLeaks cache of files on the CIA believed to be far more sizable and significant than the Edward Snowden revelations on the NSA — have been published thus far. (For more from the author of “Assange: Clinton Conspiring With Deep State to Oust Trump for a ‘Pence Takeover'” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Only Whites Can Be Racist, Insists University

/0 Comments/in , /by

A glossary published by a university insists that only whites can be racist, while also describing terms like “same gender loving” for black homosexuals and a “Brotherhood of Bears” for “queer” men who are large, hairy, and friendly.

The University of California, Davis, published assertions and definitions for these terms, and more, in an “LGBTQIA Resource Center Glossary,” as reported by Campus Reform.

UC Davis defines “racism” as “the systematic subordination of marginalized racial groups … by members of the agent/dominant/privileged racial group who have relatively more social power (white),” clearly indicating that only whites are capable of racism.

In the “transition” part of the glossary, the college suggests that transgender individuals can be considered as such without changing their names, legal gender, or undergoing hormone therapy or surgical operations.

The school defines homosexuality, but it also includes a definition for “same gender loving,” which is “a term used by some African American folks who love, date, have attraction to people of the same gender.” (Read more from “Only Whites Can Be Racist, Insists University” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.