Rappers Come Together to Express Support for Police, Open Dialogue

Rappers Snoop Dogg and The Game led a peaceful march on Friday to the Los Angeles Police Department Headquarters, where they expressed their support for work of law enforcement and their desire for an open dialogue.

Appearing at a joint press conference with Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and Police Chief Charlie Beck, Snoop Dogg said, “We are here to show love and support to the police force and get some understanding and some communication.”

The rapper added, “Our whole mission today was to move in peace and to show that LA can be unified, and not to bash the police, but to come up here and get some dialogue and communication, because we are all angels like [Mayor Garcetti] said. We are all for Los Angeles. We all represent the same cause, and we all want to go home to our families. Today was the first step to many steps.”

The Game, whose legal name is Jayceon Terrell Taylor, said during the press conference, “While I have all these cameras on me … I want to tell everyone that has their eyes on me that I love you — no matter what race you’re from, no matter where you come from, no matter what gang you’re from or what police force you stand for, what badge you put on, what school you teach, whoever you are in the world,” he continued. “If you are a human being … this is a day of change … Embrace yourself in positivity.”

The Game also expressed hope that Los Angeles in coming together could set an example for the country and even the world. The performer said he had no idea when he called his friend Snoop Dogg and suggested they do the march that they would end up meeting the mayor and the police chief.

He also found it meaningful the march coincided with the graduation of a new class of police officers, who they were able to meet.

“Sometimes God works in mysterious ways,” Mayor Garcetti said of the two events converging. Both he and Chief Beck expressed their appreciation for the chance to meet with the rappers and discuss ways for better community relations. (For more from the author of “Rappers Come Together to Express Support for Police, Open Dialogue” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Officials Piece Together Background of Dallas Sniper

A 25-year-old black man with no known criminal record and no known ties to any terrorist group has been identified as the sniper who ambushed Dallas police officers Thursday night.

Micah Xavier Johnson of Mesquite, Texas, was identified by officials as the suspect killed after a gun battle with police Thursday night.

ABC reported that Johnson served in the Army as a carpentry and masonry specialist until April 2015.

Wayne Bynoe, a neighbor of Johnson’s, told CNN that Johnson lived with his mother and “keeps to himself.”

The Los Angeles Times, citing a law enforcement official, reported Johnson “belonged to an informal gun club and took copious amounts of target practice.”

During the standoff between Johnson and police Thursday night, Johnson “expressed anger for Black Lives Matter,” Dallas Police Chief David Brown said.

“He said he was upset at white people,” Brown said. “He said he wanted to kill white people, especially white police officers.”

Brown said Johnson told police he acted on his own initiative.

“The suspect stated that he was not affiliated with any groups, and he stated that he did this alone,” Brown said.

The Daily Beast reported that on Facebook, Johnson liked pages relating to Elijah Mohammed, the founder of the Nation of Islam, as well as other militant and black separatist groups including the New Black Panther Party and the African American Defense League.

On Friday, Brown said Dallas police are still trying to determine whether Johnson had help.

“If there’s someone out there associated with this, we will find you,” Brown said. Media accounts have reported three people in custody related to the shootings.

Brown said that the decision to use a bomb affixed to a robot as a means to ending the standoff with Johnson came after negotiations had come to a standstill. The blast killed Johnson after he refused to surrender.

“We saw no other option but to use our bomb robot and place a device on its extension for it to detonate where the suspect was. Other options would have exposed our officers to great danger. He seemed lucid during negotiations,” Brown said. (For more from the author of “Officials Piece Together Background of Dallas Sniper” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Tension Occurs During Trump’s Meeting With Senate Republicans

Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump went to Capitol Hill several days ago to try and unify his party in hopes of beating Hillary Clinton. With the backing of Senate Republicans Trump stands a better chance at garnering more votes during the general election.

However, things got a little tense when Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake confronted Trump on his rhetoric.

“You’ve been very critical of me,” Trump said in his opening statements to Flake.

“Yes, I’m the other senator from Arizona — the one who didn’t get captured — and I want to talk to you about statements like that,” Flake responded. He was, of course, referring to the incident in which Trump made inflammatory comments about Sen. John McCain for not being a war hero.

Flake mostly wanted him to change his tune when it came to immigration and Latino people — specifically to stop attacking Mexicans. The Republican senator did acknowledge, though, that he was not part of the “Never Trump” movement, and would support Trump under the right circumstances.

Various media outlets reported that the meeting was a disaster, making it appear Trump might be dividing instead of unifying. But Paul Manafort, Trump’s campaign chairman, dispelled that rumor via a statement.

“Today’s meeting was positive and productive and these characterizations, attributed to unnamed sources, are wholly inaccurate,” Manafort said. “The conversation was very positive and substantive. The Members were in total agreement with Mr. Trump of the need to unite the Party and work together to win the Presidency and keep a Republican Congress. Mr. Trump was pleased with the discussion and looks forward to working together with the Republican Party leadership towards defeating Hillary Clinton in November.”

A number of other Republicans also expressed concern about Trump’s rhetoric during the meeting. But House Speaker Paul Ryan was hopeful about the outcome.

“We clearly have a presumptive nominee who wants to work with us on moving this agenda forward,” he said. (For more from the author of “Tension Occurs During Trump’s Meeting With Senate Republicans” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

A Crisis of Military Leadership as Obama Doubles Down on His Political War in Afghanistan

Every day brings another fresh scandal or outrageous policy from this administration. Earlier this week, Obama announced his intention to keep most of the 9,800 troops in Afghanistan for the remainder of his presidency. While this story was washed away from the public eye by the Hillary Clinton-James Comey email server saga, it represents one of the bigger scandals of Obama’s presidency. Obama is keeping our troops, mainly elite special operators, in a meat-grinder with no mission, no strategic goals, and the most outlandish rules of engagement imaginable. Sadly, Congressional Republicans and conservative foreign policy establishment gurus are cheering this decision. To them, as long as troops remain in the theater, there is nothing more to discuss and they move onto the next issue. In reality, keeping our soldiers in a meat-grinder is worse than pulling them out.

After 15 years in Afghanistan, 1,856 killed in action, over 20,000 wounded and a trillion dollars spent, we have nothing to show but Al Qaeda being stronger than ever and the Taliban controlling more territory than any time since 2001. Two-thirds of those casualties occurred under Obama’s watch between years eight and 12 of the conflict. We are left propping up a corrupt, sharia-compliant government with a constitution (set up by U.S. officials) which mandates the sort of draconian version of Islam we are supposedly at war with. Shouldn’t all sides agree that at this point we should either identify a strategic mission and outcome that is beneficial to our security interests and pursue it with everything we have – or leave entirely?

As I explained a few weeks ago, to place our soldiers in the most precarious situations but deny them the ability to even defend themselves, much less go on offense, is an immoral affront to our most elite troops. Having them do so for a government that hates us and is not too different from the Taliban is even more vexing.

On the one hand, Obama admitted in his announcement Wednesday that the situation in Afghanistan is “precarious.” n the other hand he is saying that our troops are only there to advise and train the Afghani military. Worse, as the Wall Street Journal reported, the rules of engagement are so bad that even elite special forces have to call a lawyer before taking a shot at the Taliban in the heat of battle. This is a lethal combination. The reality is that they are not advisors and are not just there to train Afghanis. They are some of our best special operators who go behind enemy lines together with Afghani soldiers (who are often unreliable) in the most intense special operations missions. The Afghan government is aware of every operation ahead of time and is rotten to the core. They are placed into combat yet can’t engage in combat. Obama is using them as pawns to keep just enough of Afghanistan intact so there is no Saigon-style fall of Kabul during his tenure.

After 15 years of failure we need to think broader than the binary choice of “pulling out” vs. a “troop surge.” You can never win a war when you can’t define the enemy and understand that enemy’s threat doctrine. The threat doctrine is Sharia, yet somehow our military and government leaders think it is worth our blood and treasure to establish a Sharia-government in Afghanistan all the while refusing to build a broader long-term vision of how to keep that region together and how it fits in with our overall strategic interests. We have a crisis of leadership in the civilian and military leadership in the Pentagon whereby in order to forge a successful career one must completely support the whitewashing of Sharia and social engineering in the military. This entire generation of generals is rotten to the core, as witnessed by not a single leader resigning or protesting what Obama is going to our military, the whitewashing of Sharia-compliant training, and the shocking and disrupting social engineering mandates.

Immediately following Obama’s Afghanistan announcement, Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas (F, 52%), Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, blasted Obama for not putting enough troops and funding behind the endless Afghanistan war. It’s time Republican leaders on military affairs understand that the crisis in our military and foreign policy is much more foundational than a lack of resources. It’s a moral crisis that predated Obama, although he certainly exacerbated it to an unconscionable level. We are now seeing scores of GOP foreign policy elites cast their lot with Hillary Clinton. Putting aside legitimate conservative concerns about Trump, these individuals are not opposing the GOP nominee for good reasons. They are opposing him because they are fearful, rightfully or wrongly so, that he will actually reverse the political correctness in the military and the willful blindness to our true enemy. Everyone I know who worked in intelligence or special operations strategic planning circles is very adamant that the willful blindness towards Sharia-based Islam and the Muslim Brotherhood – both domestically and abroad – began during the Bush years.

For Republicans to continue droning on about “staying the course” and increasing funds for Afghanistan while our troops are being used as pawns in a war of misinformation is a disservice to those who are shouldering the burden of the willful blindness, which is embedded in the highest ranks of military and civilian command. It’s time for an entirely new approach on the Right, and that begins with a full understanding of what and who we are fighting. (For more from the author of “A Crisis of Military Leadership as Obama Doubles Down on His Political War in Afghanistan” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

College Professor Calls for Mass Murder at NRA Headquarters

After the news that eleven Dallas officers were shot and five killed, many have pointed fingers at the rhetoric of the Black Lives Matter movement and at politicians for refusing to draw the proper conclusions. The concern that the police, while protecting the rights of BLM rally-goers, were picked off by a gunman, who clearly stated he wanted to kill white cops, has regular Americans partially paralyzed about what can be done about the crisis.

It’s clear the radicals who seek social change do not care at all about justice, since all of the killed officers were individuals who had nothing to do with any incidents portrayed by BLM as racially motivated killings. But because of the mental sickness that focuses on uniform and skin color, every white cop is in an extremely dangerous position.

So it would be helpful if people started taking rhetoric about murdering people with guns pretty seriously. Law-abiding gun owners don’t go out and buy a gun to murder people, nor do they share plans to do so on social media in order to create “social change.”

Case in point: James Pearce. The FBI is now investigating Professor Pearce’s Facebook post from the middle of June that called for killing everyone at the NRA headquarters. Pearce is an adjunct professor of Southern State Community College in Ohio, and was referred to the FBI and Loretta Lynch told the college head to take no action until the federal government concluded their investigation.

Reports say that a former student alerted local law enforcement of this post and the matter made it to the FBI and Homeland Security.

So let’s look at Pearce’s comments and see if what he is now saying, that it was all just a funny sarcastic joke, and that people need to loosen up and stop being so divided, is true. First of all, the day of the posting, June 13th, the news cycle was saturated with the news of the Orlando terrorist massacre, and the day before, Obama issued a statement about the massacre and included this dog whistle in his remarks.

“The shooter was apparently armed with a handgun and a powerful assault rifle,” Obama said. “This massacre is therefore a further reminder of how easy it is for someone to get their hands on a weapon that lets them shoot people in a school, or in a house of worship, or a movie theater, or in a nightclub. And we have to decide if that’s the kind of country we want to be. And to actively do nothing is a decision as well.”

So a comment like this from a professor right after Obama makes the attack about gun control doesn’t sound like a joke. Pearce also seems to be hiding behind “art” as he insists that he was just making “poetry.” He often writes poetry on his Facebook account, and earlier this week drafted a poem complaining that as an American, he should be able to say what he wishes and that he is actually a brave man.

So let’s talk about what would happen to our brave professor if he approached the NRA headquarters with a bunch of armed “anti-gun types” in Fairfax, Virginia.

He’d get shot, and maybe learn a lesson.

The NRA headquarters is staffed by very well trained gun experts, and Virginia is a concealed carry state. Anti-gun types armed with guns they are extremely afraid of using would be pretty easy sitting ducks for those defending themselves. If the Orlando night club held some people with the expert training the folks at the NRA headquarters have, any gunman who showed up to the nightclub and opened fire, would expect to die that night.

And that’s what the anti-gun people don’t get. If law abiding people are allowed to carry guns, non-law abiding people like Mr. Pearce here, would not be able to carry out their terrorist plans in order to create social change.

Even though the professor laughs it off now asserting that only those with low IQ’s could possibly have thought it serious, his post is no small thing because of the times we live in and the dangerous leadership this nation has. Intentionally taking the focus off of lawbreakers and instead hyping hatred has not and will not stop bad people from killing. In fact, it’s creating a mentality that having a gun is a license to kill, rather than a weapon for self-defense against the crazies like the Dallas shooter. Yet the professor’s commentary holds distinctly murderous rhetoric, and what is most despicable, is that his purpose is to make guns illegal through using them illegally, no matter what the human cost.

It may very well happen that Mr. Pearce suffers no consequences for his incitement, but law-abiding gun owners in the area where he lives ought to encourage the college to remove him from their community classrooms. Someone so flippant about killing people for political gain ought to be watched very carefully. (For more from the author of “College Professor Calls for Mass Murder at NRA Headquarters” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

FEDERAL COURTS: Emperor Obama’s Executive Overreach Is Bullsh**

In another blow to President Obama’s flagrant executive overreach, a federal appeals court smacked down an ObamaCare rule requiring all indemnity health insurance plans to meet essential coverage minimum standards. The decision offered by the three-judge panel included Patricia Millet, an Obama nominated judge, who said the Administration “overreached” when it adopted a 2014 rule that “effectively eliminated” the plans by adding “additional criteria” to previous law.

The courts have repeatedly rebuked Obama for extending his executive pen too far. In May, a federal judge ruled Obama “exceeded his authority” and struck down an Obamacare provision giving billions of dollars to health insurers through subsidies.

Last month, an Obama-appointed federal judge struck down Obama’s overreach when it came to fracking regulations.

In the ruling on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Scott Skavdahl said Congress had not granted the BLM that power, and had instead chosen to specifically exclude fracking from federal oversight. Skavdahl made it clear what he was — and wasn’t — considering in his ruling. ‘The issue before this Court is not whether hydraulic fracturing is good or bad for the environment or the citizens of the United States,’ he wrote. The question, instead, is ‘whether Congress has delegated to the Department of Interior legal authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing. It has not.’”

In June, an appeals court ruled Obama had wrongly bypassed Congress on his temporary government appointments.

“Congress did not want the president to install his chosen replacement unless the Senate approved,” SW General argued. “Allowing the permanent nominee to begin work immediately as an acting official would enable the president to advance his agenda without obtaining the Senate’s advice and consent.”

Last year, the Courts blocked Obama’s water rule not once, but twice for flexing executive power exceeding federal law.

Judge Ralph Erickson of the District Court for the District of North Dakota found that the 13 states suing to block the rule met the conditions necessary for a preliminary injunction, including that they would likely be harmed if courts didn’t act and that they are likely to succeed when their underlying lawsuit against the rule is decided. … Immediately upon the rule taking effect, the rule will irreparably diminish the states’ power over their waters’ he continued, calling the Obama administration’s interpretation of its jurisdiction “exceptionally expansive.”

“In a 2-1 ruling, the Cincinnati-based Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit delivered a stinging defeat to Obama’s most ambitious effort to keep streams and wetlands clean, saying it looks likely that the rule, dubbed Waters of the United States, is illegal.”

The court’s continued rebuke of Obama’s imperial presidency shows that no one is above the law when crafting irresponsible policies that go against the Constitution and hurt Americans. Sadly, the American people must continue to look to the courts to protect them from the damaging policies of the last 7 years. (For more from the author of “FEDERAL COURTS: Emperor Obama’s Executive Overreach Is Bullsh**” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Republican Leaders Afraid to Lead, Reward Democrats for Their Sit-In Stunt

While the United States remains vulnerable to the threat of radical Islamist terrorism, House leadership idles its time by considering a vote on a bill that cooperates with the left’s narrative and erodes the rule of law and our God-given, constitutional rights.

Last week, House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., properly called out the Democrats for the “chaos” their sit-in on gun control caused in the House. But this week, he is effectively rewarding what he called their “stunt” by proposing a vote on a gun control bill instead of focusing on how Orlando terrorist Omar Mateen slipped through the FBI’s grasp so that we can better protect Americans in the future.

The Homeland Safety and Security Act, H.R. 5611, capitulates to the left by making the debate about gun control and does nothing to tackle the underlying danger that Islamist extremism poses here in the United States. It takes no steps to solve the threat posed to the United States by Islamists across the globe. It creates a new, unelected, unaccountable assistant secretary appointed by Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, who has proven himself to be willfully blind to the threat posed by radical Islamist terrorism.

Just last week former Homeland Security officer Philip Haney testified that the agency eliminated more than 850 records it had that linked to the Muslim Brotherhood because the Obama administration was cooperating with the terrorist organization on counterterrorism. Why does the Republican-controlled House want to spend at least $30 million over five years on a catastrophic department that empowers Obama’s failed strategy of ignoring the true threat posed by jihadis?

Instead of taking steps to prevent another Orlando terrorist attack, this bill creates epic legal precedent by allowing the federal government to restrict rights secured in our Constitution based on what the government predicts someone will do in the future.

The bill allows a judge to restrict Americans’ constitutional rights if a judge has “probable cause to believe” that person will someday become a terrorist. And it sets the precedent that Americans can lose God-given constitutional rights arbitrarily—as long as a member of government thinks we might commit a crime. It upends the presumption of innocence and the right to a trial by a jury of one’s peers.

GOP leadership considered allowing this Trojan-horse bill to come to the floor even as other, good bills that address the root causes of terrorism languish in committee.

One such bill that I support designates the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. Another would halt the influx of refugees from the world’s terror hot spots until they are vetted properly—sending a clear message to the American people, and to those who wish to do us harm, that we in Congress are listening and will act to defend against domestic and foreign threats.

Significant portions of this terrible “homeland security” bill did not go through the regular committee approval process, nor does it appear that GOP leadership plans to allow the amendment process to follow regular order.

If someone is a convicted terrorist, they should be jailed or deported—period. There are current laws on the books that tell us exactly what should happen if someone is convicted of terrorism, and we should make sure that our government is enforcing these laws. We need neither betray our rights, nor submit to a wholesale change of due process, to arrest and detain terrorists.

To effectively combat ISIS and global Islamists, Congress must look at solutions that are much broader than just a response to what happened in Orlando. Orlando is just one of several recent terrorist attacks around the globe which ISIS and its henchmen have proudly celebrated on social media.

The United States is in a global war on terror. Even the Democrats admit as much by asking for an AUMF to authorize that war, but Congress has still not acted. The Obama administration’s response to global terror has been feckless and incompetent, but Republicans in the House seem to be content spectators instead of leaders.

Rather than looking at how to restrict the rights of law-abiding Americans, GOP leadership in the House should allow votes on bills that focus on the true cause of terrorism: terrorists. (For more from the author of “Republican Leaders Afraid to Lead, Reward Democrats for Their Sit-In Stunt” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

More Questions About Death of UN Envoy Who Supposedly Crushed His Own Throat Before Testifying Against Hillary

By Tyler Durden. …Another official has found himself on the wrong end of the Clintons. That John Ashe was a former President of the United Nations General Assembly highlights the fact that no one is safe once in their sights.

And as you might have guessed, there are major inconsistencies with Ashe’s death. It was not only conveniently timed because Ashe died just a few days before being set to testify against Clinton in a corruption case, but official reports indicated he died of a heart attack.

The problem, however, is that police on the scene reported Ashe died when his throat was crushed during a work-out accident.

The New York Post’s Page Six reported that after Ashe was found dead Wednesday, the U.N. claimed that he had died from a heart attack. Local police officers in Dobbs Ferry, New York, later disputed that claim, saying instead that he died from a workout accident that crushed his throat.

Adding to the mysterious nature of Ashe’s death was the fact that he had been slated to be in court Monday with his Chinese businessman co-defendant Ng Lap Seng, from whom he reportedly received over $1 billion in donations during his term as president of the U.N. General Assembly.

(Read more from “More Questions About Death of UN Envoy Who Supposedly Crushed His Own Throat Before Testifying Against Hillary” HERE)

__________________________________

John Ashe, Ex-U.N. Leader Indicted Last Year, Dies

By Steven Visser and Rob Frehse. John Ashe, the former president of the United Nations General Assembly in 2013 and 2014, died Wednesday while awaiting trial in a bribery scandal, police said.

Ashe, 61, died of injuries while lifting a barbell on a bench, the Westchester, New York, medical examiner’s office told CNN Thursday.

Earlier U.N. spokesman Dan Thomas told CNN that Ashe died of a heart attack. He now tells CNN that the information came from a newspaper report in Antiqua, as well as, a former colleague of Ashe’s. The medical examiner clarified Ashe died from traumatic asphyxia and suffered laryngeal fractures while lifting.

The completed autopsy report will not be available for approximately 16 weeks when standard tests are complete. (Read more from “John Ashe, Ex-U.N. Leader Indicted Last Year, Dies” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Clinton Faults ‘White People’ and ‘Systemic Racism’ in Wake of Dallas Shootings

In the wake of the deadly Dallas ambush that killed five police officers, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton put the responsibility for addressing America’s divisions squarely on the shoulders of “white people” Friday while also calling for federal guidelines to address “systemic racism” that leads to the shooting of black men by police officers

“I will call for white people, like myself, to put ourselves in the shoes of those African-American families who fear every time their children go somewhere, who have to have ‘The Talk,’ about, you now, how to really protect themselves (from police), when they’re the ones who should be expecting protection from encounters with police,” Clinton said Friday on CNN.

“I’m going to be talking to white people, we’re the ones who have to start listening to the legitimate cries coming from our African-American fellow citizens,” she said.

“We’ve got to figure out what is happening when routine traffic stops, when routine arrests, escalate into killings … Clearly, there seems to be a terrible disconnect between many police departments and officers and the people they have sworn to protect,” she said.

Clinton said federal policing guidelines are needed because some police departments need to address “systemic racism, which is a reality, and to go after systemic bias,” she said.

Many pushed back at Clinton.

Writing on Breitbart, Joel B. Pollak said Clinton’s comments were “deeply offensive in the context of an attack where white officers had been targeted, and the very opposite of what a president is supposed to do.”

“Clinton made stark, condescending generalizations about white people and their supposed inability to listen to black people,” he added.

He also noted that in Clinton’s view, forging unity was a one-way street

“… she made no reciprocal requests of black Americans — no need to examine cultural attitudes to police, or the hostile rhetoric of some community leaders,” Pollak added, contrasting her comments with the “measured and sensitive” statement issued by Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, who called for unity among all Americans and support for law and order to protect everyone. (For more from the author of “Clinton Faults ‘White People’ and ‘Systemic Racism’ in Wake of Dallas Shootings” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

“Guccifer” Is Not Missing From His Jail Cell or Dead

(Editor’s note: although we generally do not refer readers to Snope’s due to its political bias, it appears the fact-check website got it right on this one. Please refer to the link below for the full article) On 2 July 2016, Hillary Clinton was interviewed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. On the same day, conspiracy site whatdoesitmean.com reported that hacker Marcel Lazăr Lehel (whose online moniker is “Guccifer’) had gone missing from his Virginia jail cell.

Lehel has made headlines for breaking into the emails of a number of high-level authorities in the United States and his native Romania. He has also claimed that he hacked into Hillary Clinton’s and the Democratic National Committee’s e-mail servers.

The former taxi driver is currently awaiting sentencing in the United States on charges related to hacking into private AOL accounts . . .

Rumors that Lazar had disappeared from (or died in) custody are false and were refutedMarcel Lehel Lazar, a federal inmate also known as Guccifer, is at the William G. Truesdale Adult Detention Center in Alexandria, Va. He is alive and has never been missing from this facility.

(Read more from “Guccifer” Is Not Missing From His Jail Cell or Dead” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.