One of Ted Cruz’s Opponents Just Called Him out Over 1 Thing No One Else Is Talking About

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee is seeking to siphon evangelical voters from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, by revealing the senator’s inconsistencies in his faith.

Huckabee, former governor of Arkansas, said tax records show that Cruz tithed less than 1 percent of his income to his church. Cruz and Huckabee are Southern Baptists, and that denomination’s doctrine states members are to tithe 10 percent of their income.

The tax returns are from Cruz’s 2012 senate race. According to Huckabee in one interview, “Cruz contributed less than 1 percent of his income to charity between 2006 and 2010 – a far cry from the 10 percent most evangelical leaders believe the Bible demands.” Huckabee said the amount given to his church demonstrates Cruz’s priorities in his life.

“I just think it’s hard to say God is first in your life if He’s last in your budget,” Huckabee said. “If I can’t trust God with a dime out of each dollar that I earn, then I’m not sure how I can tell Him that I trust him with my whole life.”

He said tithing demonstrates a person’s spiritual place . . .

Huckabee launched an attack on Cruz earlier in the week when he criticized the Tea Party favorite for meeting with New York gay hotel owners early in his campaign while stating he is against gay marriage. Huckabee’s criticism came after Cruz attacked “New York values” in criticizing leading GOP presidential rival Donald Trump. (Read more from “One of Ted Cruz’s Opponents Just Called Him out Over 1 Thing No One Else Is Talking About” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Exclusive: Peter Schiff Claims Something Worse Than The Great Depression Is Imminent And There’s No Way Out

Peter Schiff has been credited as being one of the few financial analysts to predict the collapse of the housing and financial markets in 2008 and the subsequent financial recession. He is also the author of several popular books on our financial state as well as a stockbroker and the founder of schiffgold.com and Euro Pacific Capital.

This week, on Joe Miller’s radio show, Peter Schiff had a strong warning for all Americans, especially investors. He is predicting an imminent recession that will last longer and be more painful than the Great Depression of the 1930’s. Due to past policies and current issues, he contends there is no way the US can avoid this catastrophe.

He blames the Federal Reserve as the primary cause of this imminent recession. He points to the Fed’s seven years of zero percent interest rates and three rounds of quantitative easing. Now that the Federal Reserve is trying to ease up on the monetary stimulus, the terrible financial state the U.S. is really in will be revealed.

Schiff also maintains that we are in a far worse position because we currently hold much more debt than we did seven years ago. He analogizes U.S. financial strategy in accruing debt with countries like China and Russia to a huge Ponzi scheme. Our foreign creditors are on to the fact that it may be impossible for us to make good on that debt and have no desire to be part of a free-money-to-the-US scheme.

Schiff contends another major problem is that the US dollar is currently overvalued. Many countries are taking advantage of this high valuation by making moves to get rid of their United States dollars. As the world’s reserve currency, this overvaluation also creates instability internationally.

The only reason the U.S. hasn’t collided with economic disaster yet is, in Schiff’s opinion, the currency speculators. However, no matter what the speculators do, the dollar will eventually fall, as much as 30%. In a worst case scenario, the end result could be hyperinflation, wiping out most of the value of the dollar.

Schiff also reminded listeners that the dollar itself does not hold any intrinsic value. Its value is entirely contingent upon people’s confidence in it. Once people lose confidence in the dollar, its value will evaporate and will be worthless to purchase anything with, so political leaders do what they can to reinforce faith in it. A case in point is Obama’s State of the Union address where he falsely claimed that the economy had recovered. According to Schiff, these false reports that the economy has recovered are being used to prop up confidence in the dollar.

There are numerous indicators that the US economy is in serious trouble. At the beginning of this year several companies (Walmart, Macy’s, and Finish Line) all reported numerous store closures and massive layoffs. Walmart alone is expected to layoff 10,000 people. Other companies that do not have physical stores such as Yahoo and Johnson and Johnson have also announced layoffs that will affect thousands of more people. Finally, the percentage of adults in the labor force is at the lowest level in 40 years while wage gains for most workers has been a nonexistent. These are all indicators that the U.S. economy is in troubled waters.

What is Peter Schiff’s advice for U.S. investors? To protect against the imminent collapse, they should immediately divest themselves from the U.S. stock market and sink their money in international markets, gold and silver stocks, and other commodities.

Only time will tell whether Schiff has accurately predicted yet another financial catastrophe for the United States. One thing is sure: if he’s right about an imminent Second Great Depression, this nation – and probably the world at large – will experience an era of unprecedented political instability.

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Bill Clinton Gave a Speech Backing His Wife’s Presidential Candidacy in Las Vegas… Here’s the Thing

Last night, Bill Clinton gave a speech in Las Vegas, just a short distance from a porno conference at the Hard Rock Casino being hosted by the AVN Adult Entertainment Expo.

Clinton’s speech was supposed to convince attendees of a tech conference that Hillary is “the best choice in 2016.” No word on whether the serial philanderer stopped by the Hard Rock Casino later that evening.

(Read more from “Bill Clinton Gave a Speech Backing His Wife’s Presidential Candidacy in Las Vegas… Here’s the Catch” HERE)

__________________________

In Las Vegas Speech, Bill Clinton Backs Wife’s Presidential Candidacy

By Ben Botkin. Former president Bill Clinton visited Las Vegas on Thursday with a singular mission: bolster support in the early voting state as his wife Hillary Clinton angles for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Bill Clinton spoke Thursday in support of his wife’s presidential candidacy in a crowded gymnasium at Advanced Technologies Academy in Las Vegas. Clinton said in the end, what matters is not divisive campaigning, but whether the country is better off when a president’s term ends.

“You’ve got to rise above it just like she has,” Clinton said in his nearly hour long speech. “Keep in mind in the end that’s all that matters.” (Read more from “In Las Vegas Speech, Bill Clinton Backs Wife’s Presidential Candidacy” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Obama May Have Gone Too Far: He Just Got Blasted With a Major Lawsuit That Could Hurt…

The first lawsuit has been filed challenging the constitutionality of President Barack Obama’s executive actions concerning gun control, which he announced earlier this month.

Conservative attorney Larry Klayman filed a suit in federal district court in Florida which accuses the president of seeking to circumvent the legislative process and invent new gun laws in violation of the Constitution’s separation of powers.

“The president states that he is doing so purely because he does not like the legislative decisions of the Congress,” argues Klayman, the founder of Freedom Watch.

“These actions are unconstitutional abuses of the president’s and executive branch’s role in our nation’s constitutional architecture and exceed the powers of the president as set forth in the U.S. Constitution,” he continues.

Klayman further contends that the president’s actions unlawfully infringe on Americans’ Second Amendment rights. “The Defendants’ rewriting of laws burdening and abridging the fundamental rights of the Plaintiff and other U.S. citizens under the Second Amendment by the President and his executive branch is unconstitutional…”

One of the new gun control measures announced by the president two weeks ago redefines what it means to be in the business of selling guns to include non-gun dealers. (Read more from “Obama May Have Gone Too Far: He Just Got Blasted With a Major Lawsuit That Could Hurt…” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Next President Must Flush out Administrative State

Picture your dream scenario for 2016: your favorite Republican candidate becomes president and the more conservative candidates win Senate seats. For good measure, let’s continue dreaming and toss in the resignation of Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan as a viable political outcome for 2016. We are all set and ready to restore our republic, right?

Not so fast.

First, as we’ve noted before, the courts will continue to illegally grab power from the other two branches and invalidate many of our priorities, especially as it relates to immigration.

But more fundamentally, the next president will immediately be confronted by the “fourth branch of government” — the administrative state. Even when Republicans win the White House, the various departments and agencies that actually run government serve as a collective fourth branch and a fifth column countermanding any semblance of the conservative agenda.

Let’s consider the issue of immigration as one example of this dynamic.

Ian Smith, a friend of mine and an expert on immigration law, wrote an eye-opening column at the Washington Times detailing the extent of control the radical open borders lobby wields over immigration “enforcement”:

After receiving through a public records request the resumes of every immigration judge approved by the Justice Department since 2012, around half were found to have past ties to open-borders groups. Fifteen of the 34 hires whose resumes IRLI received worked for either open-borders advocacy groups, such as the Soros-funded Catholic Legal Immigration Network, or had been in private immigration law practice, an industry whose remuneration is tied to open borders. Several of the appointed judges were affiliated with both groups, while others were actual AILA chapter board members.

A note on the particularly cynical field of immigration law: Although it is true that immigration attorneys understand immigration law and, therefore, may appear best suited for a role in the immigration courts, it’s not an exaggeration to say that their work hinges on impeding those very laws and pushing for ever more-porous borders. AILA, for instance, attacks states that try to pass their own immigration laws and it claims publicly that the president’s unilateral amnesty programs are, in fact, legal.

Ideological imbalance at the Department of Justice was once made the subject of an investigative series by PJ Media. Within the Office of Special Counsel, the section tasked with enforcing the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, PJ Media found that most Obama hires in the department had a background involving open-borders fanaticism.

Not only do the fanatical open borders groups control the legal profession and influence the Article III courts, they serve as the foxes guarding the immigration enforcement hen house within the administrative courts. Consequently, even a president who wants to enforce immigration law will be stymied with every last deportation unless he has the resolve to flush DHS and DOJ of every last vestige of open border influence. This is no easy task because, as Ian Smith notes, there is an entrenched and inherent ideological balance in these agencies that has accumulated over the years. These groups have a monopoly on the relevant departments because they have long been regarded as the only people with core competency and expertise on the subject matter.

This is true of almost every department. It is the Sierra Club-style groups that control the EPA; the Acorn-types who control HUD, the race hustlers who control DOJ; the open borders lobbyists who control DHS; the Muslim Brotherhood and liberal Islamist sympathizers who influence the State Department.

These are the questions that are never asked at the debates. Where a candidate “stands on the issues” in the abstract is meaningless unless he or she has the principled foundation, the moral resolve, and a cadre of movement conservative staff around who are willing to clean out every one of these agencies and install intrepid constitutionalists to run them.

Democratic presidents never have these problems because, as noted above, the inherent ideological balance in most of these public policy fields is already oriented towards implementing their priories. And after eight years of Obama, every nook and cranny of the executive branch will be contaminated with hostile elements. Obama has left no stone unturned in orienting each department, agency, and office towards the execution of a cross-sectional portfolio of liberal priorities. For example, he has the U.S. embassies in Central America not only promoting open borders but promoting national transgender day.

With Donald Trump as the front-runner, these are some of the questions he needs to answer. He has recently extolled his ability to work with people and cut deals. He has decried the gridlock in Washington. The problem with that mentality is that if you are looking for efficiency instead of principle, as many businessmen are often inclined to do, the path to least resistance is to work with the administrative state instead of going to war with it. And that would render the presidency worthless, especially following Obama’s fundamental transformation of an already-imbalanced administrative state.

Trump has captured the minds of many conservatives with his promises to enforce our immigration laws and sovereignty. But if he is committed to cutting deals in order to avoid gridlock, nowhere will his agenda be rendered more worthless than in the realm of immigration enforcement. (For more from the author of “The Next President Must Flush out Administrative State” please click HERE)

Watch a recent interview with the author below:

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Students Boycott High School’s Required Racial Identity Day

At least one thousand students skipped New Trier High School’s mandatory day of “racial identity” classes on Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day.

The suburban Chicago high school, which ranks among the top public high schools in the country, held class on the public holiday, and scheduled seminars on “systemic racism” that sought to increase students’ awareness “of their own racial identities and the identities of others” . . .

One parent, whose daughter is biracial, told Breitbart News that her daughter had deliberately avoided the program for fear of being singled out and forced to define herself by her skin color . . .

Though she generally disapproved of missing school, she allowed her daughter to skip the day. “I felt bad for her…I’ve never felt race has been a factor in our lives,” she said.

“It’s one thing to study Dr. King’s ‘I Have a Dream’ speech,” she added. “But to talk about feeling guilty because you are white?…These kids today are so far beyond it. It’s like they don’t see color.” The district’s program, she said, is “going backwards.” (Read more from “Students Boycott High School’s Required Racial Identity Day” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

WOW: Ted Nugent Watches 13-Hours, You Won’t Believe What He Said (The Secret Service is Probably Investigating)

In a startling reaction to the blockbuster 13-Hours Benghazi movie, Ted Nugent demanded that Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama should be tried for treason and hung. He also contends that it was our “unholy rotten soulless criminal America destroying government” that “killed 4 Americans in Benghazi.”

Here’s Nugent’s raw post in his characteristically brutal, racially-tinged form:

Our unholy rotten soulless criminal America destroying government killed 4 Americans in Banghazi. Period! What sort of chimpass punk would deny security, turn down 61 requests for security, then tell US forces to STAND DOWN when they were ready to kickass on the allapukes & save American lives! Obama & Clinton, thats who. They should be tried for treason & hung. Our entire fkdup gvt must be cleansed asap.

A preview by Benghazi security officer Kris “Tanto” Paronto of 13 Hours, the block-buster Michael Bay film that premieres on Thursday, raises dramatic new questions about the refusal by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to authorize a military rescue of the besieged U.S. diplomatic facility and the nearby CIA Annex on Sept 11-12, 2012.

In a presentation at a conference organized by the Maryland Citizen Action Network last weekend, Paronto revealed that two AC-130H “Spectre” gunships were “on call” that night, both within range of Benghazi.

One of them was a six-hour flight away, co-located with a U.S. special operations team in Djibouti.

The other was at Naval Air Station Sigonella, in Sicily. “That’s a 45-minute flight,” Paronto said. [OPS note: AC-130H flight time for that distance is somewhat longer than 45 minutes. The end result is identical to what the author intends].

The Spectre gunship with its 25mm rapid-fire gatling guns, its 40 mm precision Bofors gun, and its 105mm canon is “good in urban warfare because you have little collateral damage,” Paronto explained.

In fact, it was just what the beleaguered security team needed. They could see the jihadis advancing on the Annex compound throughout the night and lit them up with lasers, which the airborne crew could have used for precision targeting purposes. On-line videos of the Spectre gunship in operation show that it can walk its cannons up narrow streets, killing fighters while leaving the surrounding buildings intact and people inside them unharmed.

“I asked for the Spectre and ISR [an armed Predator drone] at 9:37 pm,” Paronto said, certain that the attacks actually started at 9:32 pm local time, not 9:42 pm as previously reported. “At midnight, they told us they were still working on getting us that Spectre gunship. Not that it was not available, but that they were still working on it.”

And there were more forces immediately available for a rescue effort, in particular, the European Command (EUCOM) Commander’s In-Extremis Force, which was then on a counter-terrorism training mission in Croatia, a 3 hour flight from Benghazi.

Paronto knew people in that unit, and remembers calling them after he and his security team got back to the CIA Annex from the diplomatic compound, where they had just rescued the surviving U.S. personnel. “They were loading their gear into their aircraft and ready to go,” he recalled.

Later, his friends in the unit told him they had been shut down sometime after midnight.

All evidence now points to a specific stand-down order issued by Secretary Clinton, since the Libyan facilities came under her direct authority. Without a specific request for assistance from the State Department, the Pentagon was powerless to act.

Last month, the State Department released a critical email, sent at 7:09 pm Washington time (1:09 am Benghazi time) from Jeremy Bash, a top aide to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, informing Mrs. Clinton’s office of various military assets that were “spinning up as we speak” to deploy to Benghazi.

Among those assets were C-110 in Croatia, two U.S. Marine Corps Fleet Antiterrorism Security Team (FAST) platoons based in Rota, Spain, the Spectre gunships, armed Predator drones, and possibly elements of Marine Expeditionary Units in the Mediterranean and the Red Sea.

In preparation for deploying C-110 directly to Benghazi from Croatia, General Carter Ham, commander-in-chief of Africa Command (AFRICOM), issued orders transferring authority for C-110 to him from European Command (EUCOM).

General Ham was doing what any smart U.S. military officer would have done, by laying the ground work for a formal order he expected to come down an hour or two later.

“Assuming Principals agree to deploy these elements, we will ask State to secure the approval from host nation,” Bash wrote. “Please advise how you wish to convey that approval to us.”

When Bash sent that email, Paronto and his team-mates had just fought off an assault on the Annex by twenty or more well-armed jihadis. They would continue to fight throughout the night, as larger and increasingly brazen groups of jihadis gathered in dark areas beyond the Annex the security officers referred to as “Zombieland.”

They certainly could have used the support from the Spectre gunship, or the arrival of forty or so well-armed Special Operations combat specialists from C-110.

To date, the State Department has not released any reply from Mrs. Clinton’s office to Bash’s 7:09 PM request. However, we know from the testimony of the top U.S. diplomat in Tripoli at the time, Greg Hicks, that the State Department never requested country clearance from Libya for any U.S. forces that night.

And when the orders finally went out from Panetta’s office an hour later, they included a retransfer of C-110 from AFRICOM back to EUCOM, along with orders for the unit to move to Sigonella the next day and hold in place, instead of flying to Benghazi.

In other words, because Mrs. Clinton refused to authorize those forces to deploy into Libya to assist State Department personnel and State Department facilities, Panetta had no other choice but to put them on hold.

“The State Department was concerned that an overt U.S. military presence in Libya could topple the government,” a senior AFRICOM commander involved in that night’s events told me. “They were in denial. They wanted a narrative that al Qaeda was on the run. Instead, four Americans died.”

With the release of the Bash email and 13 Hours, Mrs. Clinton’s cover has been blown.

I also asked Paronto last weekend if he had heard reports of an Iranian Quds Force presence in Benghazi, as I had been hearing from numerous U.S. military intelligence sources, including senior AFRICOM commanders.

“Everyone knew the Iranians were there,” he replied. “Especially once the Red Cross [Red Crescent] team from Iran was ‘kidnapped’ in Benghazi [on July 31] by Ansar al-Sharia, we knew about them and were tracking them.”

As I reported in Dark Forces: the Truth About What Happened in Benghazi, U.S. military and civilian intelligence agencies produced between 50 to 60 reports on the Iranian presence in Benghazi and Derna in 2012, and Iran’s deep involvement with Ansar al-Sharia, the group that claimed responsibility for the Benghazi attacks. Multiple FOIA requests seeking copies of these reports from the National Director of Intelligence and from AFRICOM have gone without response.

It’s time to remove the wraps of secrecy from those reports as well, so the American public can finally learn the truth about who plotted, organized and paid for the Benghazi attacks.

Kenneth Timmerman is the New York Times best-selling author of “Dark Forces: the Truth About What Happened in Benghazi,” and other books.

Ted Cruz Just Announced Something Major About Trump’s Support System: ‘The Establishment Is…’

By Rosie Gray. Ted Cruz dismissed Iowa governor Terry Branstad’s opposition to his campaign on Tuesday, implying that Branstad is part of the same “cronyism” establishment as Donald Trump.

“It is not a surprise that the establishment is in full panic mode,” Cruz told BuzzFeed News in an interview on his campaign bus. “We predicted from the very beginning that the Washington cartel would fire every tool in its arsenal to prevent a conservative victory in this primary.”

“The cartel exists to make deals and to pick winners and losers through cronyism and corporate welfare,” Cruz told BuzzFeed News. “And so it’s no surprise that more and more of the establishment is beginning to support Donald Trump. Because Donald has promised to make deals and to continue the cronyism and corporate welfare of Washington. That’s what the cartel does. They make deals with Democrats.”

Branstad told reporters at the Iowa Renewable Fuels Summit on Tuesday that Cruz “hasn’t supported renewable fuels, and I think it would be a big mistake for Iowa to support him.” Cruz opposes the Renewable Fuel Standard, a government standard requiring transportation fuel to include a certain amount of ethanol, which is a touchstone of Iowa politics.

Branstad confirmed to reporters that he doesn’t want Cruz to win the Iowa caucuses. He had previously said he remain neutral. Branstad, whose son works for a pro-ethanol group, has also said that Donald Trump’s questions about Cruz’s eligibility for the presidency because of his birth in Canada are “fair game.” (Read more from “Ted Cruz Just Announced Something Major About Trump’s Support System: ‘The Establishment Is…'” HERE)

___________________________

Bob Dole on Ted Cruz: ‘Nobody Likes Him’

By Josh Hafner. Bob Dole said Wednesday that Ted Cruz at the top of the GOP ticket would mean “wholesale losses” for the party in Washington and across the country.

“I don’t know how he’s going to deal with Congress,” Dole said in an interview with The New York Times. “Nobody likes him.”

Dole, a former Kansas senator, was the Republican Party’s presidential nominee in 1996.

Donald Trump would “probably work with Congress,” though, Dole mused, because he’s “kind of a deal maker.”

Dole characterized Cruz as an “extremist” unwilling to work with his own party. The Times’ Maggie Haberman notes that Dole’s comments reflect a larger tension that establishment Republicans feel with Cruz, who portrays himself on the campaign trail as their antithesis. (Read more from “Bob Dole on Ted Cruz: ‘Nobody Likes Him'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

‘We’re Going to Go to Hell in a Handbasket!’: Palin Wows Trump Rally by Calling Obama ‘Weak-Kneed Capitulator-In-Chief’

Sarah Palin got a rock star’s welcome in Tulsa, Oklahoma on Wednesday as she told a crowd of 10,000 that America is ‘going to go to hell in a handbasket’ and urged them in her trademark twang to vote on ‘Soooper Tooooosday.’

Palin endorsed Trump in a stream-of-consciousness stemwinder Tuesday during a rally in Ames, Iowa.

The 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee was a no-show Wednesday morning at a smaller campaign stop in Norwalk, Iowa, as rumors swirled that a one-day political romance might already have turned sour.

But she spoke for nearly 20 minutes in Tulsa at the Mabee Arena at Oral Roberts University, calling the Republican front-runner ‘ballsy enough to get out there’ and challenge politicians on both the left and the right.

Trump introduced her as ‘a very special person, a wonderful person’ and ‘a really great friend.’ (Read more from “‘We’re Going to Go to Hell in a Handbasket!’: Palin Wows Trump Rally by Calling Obama ‘Weak-Kneed Capitulator-In-Chief'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Almost Half a Million Overstayed Business/Tourist Visas Last Year

Just how many people overstayed their visas in fiscal year 2015 and where have they gone? There’s no way to know for sure because the federal government has refused to implement visa tracking ever since Congress mandated it 20 years ago. But according to a new report from the border patrol, 482,781 individuals who entered on tourist or business visas were still believed to be illegally present in the United States at the end of FY 2015.

The number of total visa overstays for past year is likely far more than 482,000. The scope of the Department of Homeland Security report only covered data on B-1 (those visiting on business) and B-2 (those visiting on pleasure) visas. There are numerous categories of visas, such as F-1 visas for student visas, the multiple H and L foreign worker visas, and the J-1 exchange visas. We’ve admitted almost one million foreign students during the last academic year alone.

The scattered data is incomplete and leaves us with no sense of how many people overstay their visas on a given year and where they reside.

Moreover, this DHS report does not cover those who entered on various visas through land ports. This means there are likely endless numbers of Latin Americans who’ve entered through our southern border check points and have disappeared into our country. Consequently, not only has Obama’s amnesty engendered a massive surge of illegal aliens at the border, it has resulted in countless millions overstaying their visas.

Just a quick glance at the report shows that 219 B-visa holders overstayed from Afghanistan, 681 from Iraq, 564 from Iran, 1,397 from Jordan, 913 from Kuwait, 56 from Libya, 1,435 from Pakistan, 440 from Syria, 965 from Saudi Arabia, 2,227 from Turkey, and 219 from Yemen. From Nigeria, which is roughly half Muslim, that number is a whopping 6,781. Who knows how many of the roughly 157,000 foreign students from predominantly Muslim countries overstayed their visas? In 2014, ABC news discovered that 58,000 foreign nationals had overstayed their student visas, of which 6,000 represented a “heightened concern.” Again, those numbers only include foreign students.

That Congress has failed to force the administration’s hand on implementing Visa exit-entry, despite the ubiquitous public fear of Islamic terrorism, speaks volumes of their impotence.

It’s also important to note this is another reason the courts can’t save us from Obama’s amnesty. Even though the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined the issuance of work permits to some illegal aliens, they cannot practically force Obama to begin deporting those who overstayed their visas.

This is just another example why the voters have had enough with the existing power structure. (For more from the author of “Almost Half a Million Overstayed Business/Tourist Visas Last Year” please click HERE)

Watch a recent interview with the author below:

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.