Photo Credit: Fox News By Todd Starnes. A United States Marine was convicted at a court-martial for refusing to remove a Bible verse on her computer – a verse of Scripture the military determined “could easily be seen as contrary to good order and discipline.”
The plight of Lance Corporal Monifa Sterling seems unbelievable – a member of the Armed Forces criminally prosecuted for displaying a slightly altered passage of Scripture from the Old Testament: “No weapon formed against me shall prosper.”
Sterling, who represented herself at trial, was convicted February 1, 2014 in a court-martial at Camp Lejune, North Carolina after she refused to obey orders from a staff sergeant to remove the Bible verses from her desk.
She was found guilty of failing to go to her appointed place of duty, disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer, and four specifications of disobeying the lawful order of a noncommissioned officer.
The Christian Marine was given a bad conduct discharge and a reduction in rank from lance corporal to private. (Read more from “Marine Court-Martialed for Refusing to Remove Bible Verse” HERE)
More Background on the Court-Martialed Christian Marine
By Liberty Institute. While stationed at Camp Lejune, LCpl Sterling, a devout Christian of Haitian descent, noticed that other service members had placed various personal items in their work spaces at the military base. So she decided to express herself as well in her workspace by displaying one of her favorite Bible verses.
LCpl Sterling printed out the words of Isaiah 54:17: “No weapon formed against you shall prosper.” But after taping it in three different places in her workspace, LCpl Sterling’s supervisor—who also happened to be her former drill instructor—ordered her to remove the Bible verse, cursing at her in the process. When LCpl Sterling asked why, her supervisor said, “I don’t like the tone.” The service member explained it was her First Amendment right to display the Bible verse and declined to take them down. Moreover, no other person in the unit ever complained about the verse.
The next day, LCpl Sterling discovered that her supervisor tore down the Bible verse and threw it in the trash. Adding injury to insult, the U.S. Government charged LCpl Sterling with the crime of failing to obey a direct order because she did not remove the Bible verse.
“If a service member has a right to display a secular poster, put an atheist bumper sticker on their car, or get a Star of David tattoo,” explains Berry, “then Lance Corporal Sterling has the right to display a small Bible verse on her computer monitor.”
Liberty Institute has defended service members in all four branches of the military—from officers to enlisted service members to chaplains who are black and white, male and female. “Nobody in the military is safe anymore,” adds Berry, “regardless of rank, age, color, gender or branch of service. Whether you are a lowly private, or a commanding general, opponents of religious freedom simply don’t care. Clearly, people of faith are the targets.” (Read more from this story HERE)
Photo Credit: NBC News Washington lawmakers are demanding an accounting of how many airport security badges have been lost or stolen around the country as an NBC News investigation reveals the problem may be bigger than originally thought.
“Clearly there are an awful lot of things falling through the cracks and there’s just no room for error when it comes to this issue. We need answers. They’re not providing them,” said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), who chairs the Transportation Committee . . .
As NBCDFWreported in March, more than 1,400 of the badges — which allow employees to access secure areas like runways and boarding gates — went missing at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport over approximately two years.
Now, the station, in partnership with NBC San Diego, has learned that more than 270 badges went missing at the San Diego International Airport in the last two years. (Read more from “More Airport Security Badges Missing as Washington Demands Answers” HERE)
The Supreme Court is heading into the final month of its annual term.
In a potentially historic ruling, the court will decide whether same-sex couples have a right to marry nationwide, culminating a two-decade legal and political fight for [homosexual marriage].
Another much-anticipated decision will be whether the Obama administration may continue to subsidize health insurance for low- and middle-income people who buy coverage in the 36 states that failed to establish an official insurance exchange of their own and instead use a federally run version.
If the court rules against the Obama administration, about 8.6 million people could lose their subsidies under the Affordable Care Act.
Between now and late June, the court will hand down more than two dozen decisions on matters such as politics, civil rights, free speech and air pollution. Several of these cases have been pending for months, suggesting the justices have been sharply split. (Read more from “Black Robed Rulers Soon to Rule on 13 Important Cases” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-05-27 00:09:052016-04-11 11:00:43Our Black Robed Rulers (aka the Supreme Court) Soon to Issue Decrees on 13 Important Cases
In the days before the “hook-up” culture started teaching all women of every age to act like teenage boys, there was an ugly expression which callous men used: Some girls were “cheap dates.” They were so flattered when men showed interest in them, that they would respond by giving a sexually aggressive guy what he wanted, in the hope that he’d keep calling them, maybe even fall in love. He rarely did.
No doubt many girls who let themselves be treated as “cheap dates” were in fact quite attractive, intelligent, compassionate and kind. They had a lot more to offer a man than a forgettable roll in the hay, if only they had known it.
Well, there’s a political philosophy out there that persistently acts like that lonely teenage girl with low self-esteem. It’s called libertarianism. Maybe you’ve heard of it.
In its most defensible form, the libertarian worldview has a certain stark, even classical beauty — like a Greek statue seen at sunrise. Its fundamental premise is the dignity of the person and his right not to suffer violence or coercion. From this flows the “non-violence” principle: In our interactions with others, we will not use force or fraud but free exchange. All we ask of them in return is exactly the same.
We are each finally responsible for our own lives and our choices, and we should neither be parasitical on other human beings nor permit them to prey on us. We should not blame our problems on a nebulous “society,” nor let envy goad us into finding easy scapegoats, such as “the One Percent,” or “the WASPs” or “the Jews.” Nor should we expect the state to act as our wet nurse, concierge or hired hit man.
The State is there, if at all, to keep all bandits and invaders at bay. We don’t want it to wipe our nose, and we won’t let it steal our handkerchief. Like pioneers on the frontier or settlers on Mars ((libertarians love both Westerns and science fiction) we start off life with a nearly blank slate, and must carve out our way in the wilderness.
It’s incomplete, but there is much truth in this vision. The State has proven dangerous throughout history — especially in the 20th century, when apart from all deaths in wars, some 170 million civilians were murdered by their governments. Even apart from totalitarianism and murderous war, there are much worse mistakes we could make than to prune the invasive, toxic weed of unlimited government, which grows like kudzu in every nook and cranny of our lives, strangling human initiative and transforming capable grown-ups into lazy, resentful drones.
No, I don’t mean inner-city teenage moms, who are mostly victims of the welfare state — which rewards them with subsidies and financial independence for getting pregnant at age 16. I’m referring to the thousands of white, college-educated liberal arts grads using food stamps at Whole Foods, teaching adjunct as a hobby, and blogging all day about “sustainability.” Such people should go work at some place like Hobby Lobby. In a libertarian society, hunger, if nothing else, would compel them to do so.
A libertarian society would also starve the crony capitalists, who cynically exploit programs like farm subsidies to rake in tens of billions in unearned profits on useless goods — enough corn to choke us, overpriced cotton protected by tariffs that harm poor farmers in Africa, even government-subsidized tobacco. Many corporations, with thousands of lobbyists on their payroll, are tapeworms on the taxpayer, using the State to suppress competitors so that they can fleece consumers. And don’t get libertarians started on defense companies, NSA spies or the prisoners of our Drug War.
So for all their lovely principles, and cogent policy insights, why do libertarians let themselves be used again and again by the left? Like a gorgeous National Merit Scholar with an unhealthy taste for “bad boys,” libertarians consistently see their ideas trotted out whenever it suits progressives who wish to bulldoze some bulwark of ordered liberty — then callously discarded, in favor of bigger and badder government. Here are just three examples.
Same-Sex Marriage
Libertarians defend freedom of contract and free association, and the Left made good use of their arguments in attacking natural marriage. By the same principle, “covenant marriages” should also be legal and enforceable — but is anyone arguing for that? Far worse, if the Supreme Court mutilates marriage, Obama’s solicitor general has warned us that the whole panoply of anti-discrimination laws will be used to target churches that won’t worship Caesar. So big government grows, private schools and charities close, Christians lose their liberty, and the left moves on to the next target of opportunity.
Open Borders
Most libertarians argue for the free movement of peoples, and favor open borders. They say that absent a welfare state, people would spontaneously seek out opportunities, then when jobs dried up they would pick up and leave. Maybe this is true. But we will never find out because the welfare state isn’t going anywhere — in part because recent immigrants are heavy users of public benefits, so they almost universally vote for Democrats who will extend them. And impose onerous regulations on employers, nullifying their freedom of contract. And raise taxes. Low-skill immigrants serve the left as captive voters, undermining almost everything libertarians say they stand for. The left uses libertarians as human shears to cut holes in the border fence, then drops them and moves along.
Islam and War
Libertarians are right to be reflexively antiwar, since war really is “the health of the state.” Each major war we have fought, needful or not, greased the massive and irreversible growth of bureaucratic control over American citizens’ lives. Libertarians were wise when they warned that building liberal democracy via cluster bomb in the Muslim world is a wasteful errand. They are even right to worry about the implications of seeding mosques with FBI agents and informants.
But libertarians are dead wrong when they try to whitewash Islam, to pooh-pooh truth-tellers who point to that religion’s core texts, as interpreted by all recognized Islamic scholars. Their message is icy cold and crystal clear: Islam is a religion of power, of social control, which respects no rights but Allah’s. Human beings are “slaves of God,” and non-Muslims or bad Muslims are rebellious slaves who need to be punished. Devout Muslims are called to punish them, via jihad, terror, or honor-killing.
Every country on earth is a target for infiltration and conquest, then the absolute suppression of every worldview except Islam. The Muslim utopia is something like Saudi Arabia or the Islamic state. They will build it here if we let them. But libertarians encourage open immigration, which brings in millions of Muslims, a certain percentage of whom will wage jihad. Acts of terror give spooks and spies in the NSA a pretext to listen to our calls and hack our email accounts. Big government grows again, with the unwitting help of libertarian efforts to shrink it.
Used and then Discarded
If only libertarians had more respect for the integrity of their principles, and would stop letting themselves be used by opportunistic progressives. On any given issue, there are valid small-government, individual-liberties arguments to be made. But liberties come with responsibilities, which is something the left won’t admit.
So the left will gleefully accept libertarian support in removing some traditionalist or conservative restriction on individual freedom. But they won’t agree that people must live with the consequences of their choices. You want a same-sex marriage, fine — but don’t expect the Catholics or Baptists to accept it or perform it — so a libertarian would say. The leftist drops the liberty argument the moment he’s finished with it, and demands that the state enforce acceptance from every citizen.
You want to come work in America? Fine, but if you can’t support yourself you have to leave. Again, the left stops feigning interest in freedom the moment the border is open, and welcomes every immigrant to his crib in the nanny state. The process is drearily predictable.
Too many libertarians are eager to support leftist attacks on order, confident that in its absence, liberty will grow. But time and time again we see what springs up instead: More coercion, of a streamlined, more poisonous modern strain.
I wish libertarians could learn to love their principles more. I wish I could take each one of them aside and say, “You’re fabulous. You’re special! Don’t sell yourself so cheaply. Hold out for that wedding ring, and stay away from those creepy guys with goatees in the Che Guevara t-shirts.” (See “For the Left, Libertarians Are Like a ‘Cheap Date'” HERE)
Listen to an earlier interview with this author on The Joe Miller Show:
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-05-27 00:08:342016-04-11 11:00:43For the Left, Libertarians Are Like a ‘Cheap Date’ [+video]
Thanks to the assiduous work of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (and NO thanks to congressional Republicans), America can finally celebrate a victory for the rule of law and separation of powers. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the injunction the lower court placed on Obama’s November 20 executive amnesty, thereby stopping the issuance of work permits in its tracks. The three-judge panel noted that “because the government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its appeal of the injunction, we deny the motion for stay and the request to narrow the scope of the injunction.”
However, before conservatives pop the champagne and declare an immigration victory, remember that Obama is working overtime to fundamentally remake America’s immigration system through many other means – avenues not directly addressed by the courts. Congress can and must use the upcoming appropriations season to restrict and condition funding to ensure the Administration fully cooperates with established laws, rules, and precedents on issues related to interior enforcement, prosecutorial discretion, and asylum policy.
At the very least, they should pass stand-alone legislation addressing Obama’s immigration malfeasance and keep up the public pressure against executive action. Unfortunately, everyone knows there’s a collective sigh of relief in the offices of elite GOP politicians who are hoping the courts will give them cover for ignoring Obama’s pernicious immigration policies.
Earlier this year, we highlighted 5 reasons it is Congress’, not the court’s, responsibility to defund Obama’s executive amnesty. Here are 6 more reasons why Congress cannot rely solely on the courts and shirk their responsibility to wield the power of the purse:
1. Obama Has Violated the Injunction: He has already issued 2,000 work permits in contravention to the lower court’s decision. His modus operandi seems to be “ask for forgiveness, not permission.” The spigot of funding must be shut off.
2. Obama Using Asylum: Obama has already abused the existing legal channel of asylum to bring in the new wave of illegal migrants carte blanche from Central America. It’s a well-known secret in some of these Central American countries that all they need to do is file an asylum application and they are home free. Despite the fact that 70% of asylum cases are usually fraudulent, still over 90% of applications are approved. Recently, congressional leaders on the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform Committees have expressed concern that terrorists are also exploiting the asylum loophole.
3. DACA Has Not Been Overturned: Even though the court has overturned Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA), it has not overturned Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Although a group of ICE agents brought a lawsuit against Obama’s 2012 DACA program, the 5th Circuit astoundingly held that federal agents lacked standing to bring a lawsuit against the government, even though they are being threatened by the administration for following the Constitution. Obama has already issued 541,000 Social Security cards to DACA recipients. The more Obama is able to implement DACA without any congressional controls, the more the fiscal costs will become irrevocable, even if a Republican wins back the White House in 2017.
4. Hyper Prosecutorial Discretion: In addition to those illegal immigrants who are affirmatively granted work permits and Social Security cards, Obama is forcing CPB and ICE agents to release thousands of illegal aliens, including dangerous criminals, onto the streets. Although the court injunction will likely halt the issuance of benefits, it will not stop Obama’s abuse of prosecutorial discretion, which allows these people to remain on the streets. As the surge from Central America continues to grow, states and local communities will continue to incur significant costs in the form of education, healthcare, and criminal justice. Without any congressional requirement that Obama keep track of those illegal aliens that are released – something he has refused to do until now – much of the harm will be immutable.
5. Ending Local Immigration Enforcement: After years of allowing illegal aliens to flood this country without any coherent federal policy or even a desire to stem the tide, state and local enforcement of immigration laws has become the most effective tool against illegal immigration. They are the bulwark against the endless cases of illegal aliens killing Americans in drunk driving incidents, such as the killing of a Houston firefighter and his wife earlier this month. Now, Obama is committed to suspending all cooperation between local law enforcement and federal authorities on immigration.
6. Refusing to Deport: There are now 900,000 illegal aliens who have been ordered to leave the country by the courts, yet the administration is refusing to deport them. Of those ordered deported, 167,000 are criminal aliens, the very type Obama said he would prioritize for deportation. Congress has a huge role to play here. (See “6 Reasons Congress Can’t Rely on Courts to Stop Executive Amnesty”, originally posted HERE)
Listen to an earlier interview with this author on The Joe Miller Show:
It’s tough for those of us who live as civilians to truly appreciate the degree of sacrifice borne by those who wear the uniform.
As we’ve witnessed from several tragedies this year, our troops are putting their lives on the line in dangerous theaters around the globe and on training missions here at home as well. The greatest nation on earth has remained free and has prevented evil from filling the global power vacuum for years because of just a small percentage of brave Americans who sign up to defend our interests.
Coming off the heels of commemorating the sacrifices of our soldiers this Memorial Day, it is incumbent upon our civilian political leadership to think long and hard about foreign policy and how best to craft policies that will ensure the lives of our troops are not needlessly put at risk. At its core, this means when the U.S. goes to war and our troops are sent into harm’s way, it is done factoring in the best interests of our troops.
George Patton was famous for saying, “The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.” This salty Patton adage could be just as relevant today as an admonition to the civilian political class not to let political correctness, poor planning, lack of strategic goals and defined outcomes, and tepid rules of engagement needlessly kill or maim our troops.
Reasonable people can disagree over the prudence of a particular military engagement, but once our troops are sent into battle, the first priority must always be to achieve the mission with as little loss of life to U.S. soldiers, not to the other side – not even to innocent civilians. If the cause is just and the engagement deemed necessary, responsibility for civilian casualties lies at the feet of the enemy. If our political class is too squeamish about collateral damage and is intent on gratuitously risking the lives of our troops, they should not go to war in the first place.
This is a sacred goal and commitment all American leaders used to understand. We paid a heavy price for the Normandy invasion on June 6, 1944, with nearly 2,500 American fatalities. But thanks to meticulous planning, a clearly defined mission, and a no holds barred desire to achieve that mission, a continent was freed and the world was saved just one year later. This was all done despite bad luck, dismal weather, and mechanical failures that plagued the assault at Omaha Beach – and all without the enormous technological advantage the U.S. military enjoys today over its contemporary enemies.
To this day, families of WWII veterans can stand on the hallowed ground of Omaha Beach and solemnly reflect with pride on the enormous ground taken and preserved in the fight to protect our national interests and those of all humanity.
Sadly, things have only gone downhill since WWII. We no longer fight wars with clearly defined missions under leaders who have the ability to articulate a common sense outcome to the public. Our soldiers are thrust into nearly impossible situations and tangled webs of Islamic civil wars without a strategic plan to win. And most absurdly, political motivations that lead to politically correct warfare have all too often superseded the priority of achieving the mission with the least number of casualties.
Despite the failures of our civilian leadership to define our national interests and articulate a winning strategy, we have soldiers who have fought in Iraq and Afghanistan – in places like Fallujah and Ramadi – with just as much gallantry as our grandparents did at places like Omaha Beach. With over 6,700 fatalities and tens of thousands wounded, many of who are incapacitated for life with debilitating injuries or suffer from PTSD, what can the civilian leadership show these families to justify their sacrifice? Where is the ground held or gained in pursuit of U.S. national interests?
Some political leaders are wrought to say that this is the price we must pay for defending liberty in this era given the nature and logistics of the enemy. They are wrong. This is not the price we must pay; this is unacceptable. The political leadership can do better prioritizing strategic interests and defining the mission of our troops to execute unencumbered from political warfare. They must do better. They owe it to the brave soldiers in uniform.
Certainly, there is much blame appropriately ascribed to the current president for capriciously ceding the gains our military made in central and western Iraq. But much of Iraq and the sacrifice of our troops had gone toward the Iranian hegemony long before Obama took office. Iran was allowed to literally rip apart our troops with the nastiest explosive devices and they have never paid a price for it – again – even before Obama became president, other than to win control and influence over large swaths of the country.
It’s no wonder that morale in the military has sunk so low.
But rather than heap pessimism on the past, aspiring presidential candidates need to chart a course towards refocusing the core mission of the military on identifiable and tangible national interests.
If our soldiers are willing to pay the ultimate price for our freedoms, the least we can do is ensure that as few of our brave men and women are killed in action as possible, and that if they ultimately give their lives for this great nation, their sacrifice is not countermanded by the shortsightedness of those who send them into battle.
(See “Every Day Is Memorial Day”, originally posted HERE)
Listen to an earlier interview with this author on The Joe Miller Show:
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-05-27 00:07:392016-04-11 11:00:44Continue the Remembrance this Week: Every Day Is Memorial Day [+videos]
Photo Credit: WNDThe National Security Agency has tested the use of smartphone-swipe recognition technology, according to the tool’s manufacturer.
The mobile device feature, created by Lockheed Martin, verifies a user’s identity based on the swiftness and shape of the individual’s finger strokes on a touch screen. The technology is but one incarnation of handwriting-motion recognition, sometimes called “dynamic signature” biometrics, that has roots in the Air Force.
“Nobody else has the same strokes,” said John Mears, senior fellow for Lockheed IT and Security Solutions. “People can forge your handwriting in two dimensions, but they couldn’t forge it in three or four dimensions. Three is the pressure you put in, in addition to the two dimensions on the paper. The fourth dimension is time. The most advanced handwriting-type authentication tracks you in four dimensions.”
The biometric factors measured by Lockheed’s technology, dubbed “Mandrake,” are speed, acceleration and the curve of an individual’s strokes.
“We’ve done work with the NSA with that for secure gesture authentication as a technique for using smartphones,” Mears said. “They are actually able to use it.” (Read more from “NSA testing Software for Identifying You” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-05-26 02:07:572016-04-11 11:00:44NSA Testing Software that Identifies You By Your Smart Phone Swipe, Keystrokes
It’s a technology with the potential to ease California’s colossal thirst and insulate millions from the parched whims of Mother Nature, experts say.
But there’s just one problem — the “yuck factor.”
As a fourth year of drought continues to drain aquifers and reservoirs, California water managers and environmentalists are urging adoption of a polarizing water recycling policy known as direct potable reuse.
Unlike nonpotable reuse — in which treated sewage is used to irrigate crops, parks or golf courses — direct potable reuse takes treated sewage effluent and purifies it so it can be used as drinking water.
It’s a concept that might cause some consumers to wince, but it has been used for decades in Windhoek, Namibia — where evaporation rates exceed annual rainfall — and more recently in drought-stricken Texas cities, including Big Spring and Wichita Falls. (Read more about turning sewage into drinking water HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-05-26 02:07:382016-04-11 11:00:45Drought Forces California to Consider Turning Sewage into Drinking Water
By Eric Bradner. Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran married his long-time aide, Kay Webber, over the weekend in a private ceremony in Gulfport.
The seven-term Republican lawmaker’s former wife of 50 years, Rose Cochran, died last year after suffering from dementia. She had lived in a nursing home for 13 years.
Webber, Cochran’s executive assistant, has worked for the senator since 1981. Cochran’s office confirmed his marriage in a one-sentence statement Monday.
His relationship with Webber was the subject of scrutiny during Cochran’s bruising 2014 primary battle with state Sen. Chris McDaniel.
On Capitol Hill, Cochran rents the basement of a rowhouse owned by Webber. The aide accompanied Cochran on 28 trips to 45 countries between 2011 and 2013, and made 39 visits to Mississippi with the senator, McDaniel supporters pointed out. (Read more about RINO Thad Cochran HERE)
______________________________________
RINO Thad Cochran Joked About Doing “All Kinds of Indecent Things With Animals,” Now Marries Aide Paid $165k Annually in His Employ
By Erica Ritz. Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran, who made national headlines in 2014 after reminiscing about his childhood “picking up pecans, from that to all kinds of indecent things with animals,” has married his longtime aide, according to the Associated Press.
Kay Webber has worked for the Republican senator since 1981, and both are 77, spokesman Chris Gallegos said. She makes $165,000 a year in his employ. The wedding was a private ceremony in Gulfport, Mississippi. . .
Cochran, who battled Chris McDaniel for the Republican nomination, originally trailed his challenger, but won by 7,667 votes in a contentious runoff election. McDaniel filed a lawsuit claiming the runoff results were tainted by voting irregularities, but a circuit judge dismissed the lawsuit, saying it was filed too late. The state Supreme Court upheld the dismissal Oct. 24. (Read more about RINO Thad Cochran HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-05-26 02:07:182016-04-11 11:00:45RINO Thad Cochran, After Denying Affair with Aide During McDaniels Race, Marries Her
Photo Credit: The Stand Recently, Congressman Thomas Massie came to speak at the University of Cincinnati. He was the keynote speaker for the Young American for Liberty’s Ohio State conference. Massie gave an eye opening speech on how the House of Representatives works. One of his most revealing stories centered around his 500-yard run that he frequently makes from his office to the House floor . . .
Congressman Massie explained that voice votes are frequently used to pass motions, amendments, and resolutions. There are several problems with taking voice votes on important issues. First, the voice vote does not hold politicians accountable for their votes. Many of our congressmen that we send to Washington are voting against what they ran on, but we do not have a record of all of these votes. The second problem with this method of voting is that it is solely at the discretion of the House Chair. Under normal circumstances, this would be Speaker of the House John Boehner. He is the only one that is allowed to interpret the vote.
The House is supposed to have something called a “quorum” to have a vote. A quorum is defined by at least 218 congressmen. The way that Boehner decides if there is a quorum is by squinting his eyes and declaring he thinks he sees 218 people. Congressman Massie said sometimes there will only be ten congressmen present.
There are about 500 yards in between Massie’s office and the house floor. When the speaker starts to do voice votes when no one is in the house, Congressman Massie will sprint from his office to the House floor and demand a recorded vote. When Congress has a recorded vote, it forces there to be a quorum and politicians to be held accountable for their votes. Massie said that he had done this a lot since he was elected in 2012.
One of the most memorable votes was in December of 2014. The speaker indicated that the Congress was over, so all the congressmen left. It just so happened that Massie’s flight had been canceled, when he went back to his office he saw that the house was passing bills with no one present. He made the 500-yard dash, and when he got onto the house floor they were conducting a voice vote on whether or not to allow President Obama to arm Ukraine’s military. They recessed before he could make a point that a quorum was not present. The next day, after he left, they passed more bills by voice before adjourning the 113th congress. (Read more from “Congressman Massie’s 500-Yard Run That Is Driving Congress Crazy” HERE)
https://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.png00Joe Millerhttps://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploads/logotext.pngJoe Miller2015-05-26 02:06:302016-04-11 11:00:45Congressman Massie’s 500-Yard Run That Is Driving Congress Crazy [+video]