Obama’s Sordid Employment Numbers Set Several All-Time Records; Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time

Photo Credit: AP

Photo Credit: AP

By Ali Meyer. The number of Americans 16 years and older who did not participate in the labor force–meaning they neither had a job nor actively sought one in the last four weeks–rose from 92,898,000 in February to 93,175,000 in March, according to data released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

That is the first time the number of Americans out of the labor force has exceeded 93 million.

Also from February to March, the labor force participation rate dropped from 62.8 percent to 62.7 percent, matching a 37-year low.

Five times in the last twelve months, the participation rate has been as low as 62.8 percent; but March’s 62.7 percent, which matches the participation rate seen in September and December of 2014, is the lowest since February of 1978. (Read more from “Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time” HERE)

_______________________________________________________________

56,131,000 Women Aren’t in Labor Force

By Caroline May. Corresponding with the national increase in Americans not in the workforce the number of women, African Americans, and Asians not in the workforce also experienced an increase in March.

According to data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 56,131,000 million women were not in the labor force last month, an increase of more than 100,000 from February when 56,023,000 women were not in the workforce.

The level is a record high, and the labor force participation for the month of March at 56.6 percent is a 27-year low, according to CNS News. In February that rate for women was 56.7 percent.

People not in the labor force are defined as those 16 years and older who are not employed and have not “made specific efforts to find employment sometime during the 4-week period ending with the reference week.”

The unemployment rate for women did decline, from 5.4 percent to 5.3 percent. (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Which State Is Still Waiting for a Visit from Obama?

Photo Credit: AP

Photo Credit: AP

Utah, check. One more state to go for President Barack Obama: South Dakota.

Utah was the 49th state visited by Obama and the latest stop on his recent tour of Republican “red” states.

Since Republicans took control of both houses of Congress in January, Obama has traveled to 10 GOP states: Arizona, Tennessee, Idaho, Kansas, Indiana, South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky and Utah, all of which voted for Obama rival Mitt Romney in 2012. Obama also has visited nine states that voted for his re-election.

The White House says there is no concerted effort to put the president in Republican states. “”There are really important, substantive reasons that explain the places we go,” White House spokesman Eric Schultz said.

After spending the night in Salt Lake City, Obama appeared on Friday at Hill Air Force Base near Ogden to announce new steps to support military veterans by training them for solar industry jobs. “A lot of our men and women in uniform at some point are going to transition into civilian life and we want to make sure that after they’ve fought for our freedom that they’ve got jobs to come home to,” the president said. (Read more from “Which State Is Still Waiting for a Visit from Obama?” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

White House Declares War on Three Antibiotic-Resistant ‘Superbugs’

CDIFF CDCTrying to avert what some clinicians are calling “the post-antibiotic era,” the White House has declared war on three antibiotic-resistant “superbugs.”

Drug-resistant bacteria have caused 23,000 deaths and more than 2 million illnesses in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Last Friday, President Obama released his National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria, with the ambitious goal of reducing “inappropriate antibiotic use by 50 percent in outpatient settings and by 20 percent in inpatient settings” over the next five years.

Under the National Action Plan, all acute-care hospitals in the nation will be required to improve their infection control rates while simultaneously reducing the use of commonly prescribed antibiotics whose overuse is blamed for the rise of drug-resistant strains.

By 2020, the White House hopes to slash in half the infection rate of three superbugs currently listed by the CDC as “urgent threats” to public health. (Read more from “White House Declares War on Three Antibiotic-Resistant ‘Superbugs’” HERE)

ollow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Rubio Chooses Miami’s Freedom Tower to Announce 2016 Plans

rUBIOSen. Marco Rubio on Thursday told The Miami Herald that he plans to announce his 2016 intentions at a downtown landmark that was often the first stop for exiles fleeing Cuba, but the Florida Republican declined to disclose what political office he would be seeking.

Rubio, a first-generation Cuban-American, has scheduled an April 13 rally at Freedom Tower, the 11-story tower that, for more than a decade, was where refugees first met with U.S. government officials after leaving the island off the Florida coast.

“To me, it’s a place that’s symbolic of the promise of America,” Rubio said in an interview with his hometown newspaper.

Rubio earlier in the week announced the date of his announcement during an appearance on Fox News. Thursday’s interview disclosed the location, and aides said he would not reveal his 2016 plans before the event at Freedom Tower. (Read more from “Rubio Chooses Miami’s Freedom Tower to Announce 2016 Plans” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

U.S. Muslim Population to Triple by 2050 and Here’s What it Means for America

American flagLast month, CR published a series of articles spotlighting the surge in Muslim immigration to America and noted that, if a stronger vetting process is not instated for immigrants from countries with a large concentrations of fundamentalist Muslims, America could easily head down the dangerous path to balkanization that is now plaguing parts of Europe.

As Europe is unfortunately finding out, there is nothing tolerant and pluralistic about admitting radical Muslims who are driven by a hatred of people outside of their religion. In some countries, like France, Jews are now being forced to flee.

Today, Pew published their biannual projection on world population of major religions, and their findings only reinforce the concerns about letting in more radical Muslims. Europe will continue to grow its Muslim population, primarily due to fertility rates, according to the Pew projections. By 2050, 10% of all of Europe’s population will be Muslim, with countries like Sweden and England expected to have an even larger share of Muslims.

In the U.S., the Muslim population is expected to triple by 2050 – from 2.77 million to 8.1 million. It is expected to double in just 15 years.

By 2040, there will be more Muslims in the U.S. than Jews. As Pew notes, this is partially due to fertility rates but is primarily based on projections of massive Muslim immigration, which as noted before, is already hovering around 100,000 per year.

One might be asking, what is the problem with this? What are the long-term implications of these numbers?

To quote the words of Hirsi Ali, a moderate Muslim reformer who emigrated here from Somalia, from a riveting op-ed she wrote at Time Magazine on this topic:

As an immigrant of Somali origin, I have no objection to other people coming to America to seek a better life for themselves and their families. My concern is with the attitudes many of these new Muslim Americans will bring with them – and with our capacity for changing those attitudes. Approximately two fifths of Muslim immigrants between now and 2030 will be from just three countries: Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Iraq. Another Pew study – of opinion in the Muslim world – shows just how many people in these countries hold views that most Americans would regard as extreme. Three quarters of Pakistanis and more than two fifths of Bangladeshis and Iraqis think that those, like me, who leave Islam should suffer the death penalty. More than 80 percent of Pakistanis and two thirds of Bangladeshis and Iraqis regard sharia law as the revealed word of God. Only tiny fractions would be comfortable if their daughters married Christians. Only a minority regards honor killings of women as never justified. A quarter of Bangladeshis and one in eight Pakistanis think that suicide bombings in defense of Islam are often or sometimes justified. People with views such as these pose a threat to us all, not because those who hold them will all turn to terrorism. Most will not. But such attitudes imply a readiness to turn a blind eye to the use of violence and intimidation tactics against, say, apostates and dissidents – and a clear aversion to the hard-won achievements of Western feminists and campaigners for minority rights.

Ali hones in on an inconvenient truth, but one for which she can speak with authority.

It’s true that few Muslims, even from the most volatile nations, are actual terrorist operatives. However, as we’ve seen from Europe, when there is a large immigration of people who don’t adhere to the same value sets as their new country, like tolerance and democracy, the risk is run of undermining culture and creating reverse assimilation. That culture of Sharia law, which by the way, is hostile to women and gays, can help cultivate a counter-culture that fosters support for Jihad.

Ali drives this point home:

According to a detailed survey of Muslim Americans, about 8% of those surveyed said that suicide bombing and other violence is often or sometimes justified to defend Islam from its enemies. Indeed, more than a fifth of Muslim Americans say there is a great deal or a fair amount of support for extremism in the Muslim American community. About 20% say that Muslim Americans want to remain “distinct from the larger American society.” Indeed, half say they think of themselves first as a Muslim, second as American, despite the fact that 81% of those polled were U.S. citizens.

This Pew survey and the Hirsi Ali column are very salient in light of the domestic imbroglio America is engaged in with regard to religious liberty and the aggressive coercion tactics of the radical sexual identity movement. The sexual identity movement is engaging in Religophobia against religious Christians and Jews who don’t heed that movement’s demand to have their personal decisions supported by others with their private property or involuntary servitude. What does the sexual identity movement plan to do when the Muslim population of this country triples, and with it the inevitable rise of true intolerance? Whereas religious Jews and Christians are tolerant and know how to disagree agreeably and intelligently, many of these newly arrived Muslim immigrants will not operate with as much tolerance.

Ironically, the biggest threat to the broader homosexual agenda is the growth of adherence to Sharia law, yet some of the same leftists who are attacking religious groups have promoted the very policies that have created a surge in immigration from countries that don’t share the modern Judea-Christian virtue of tolerance. They tolerate the intolerant and are intolerant to those who are tolerant.

Then again, self-immolation is always a characteristic of those who are driven by hate and intolerance. (See, “U.S. Muslim Population to Triple by 2050 and Here’s What it Means for America” originally posted HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Huge Surge of ‘Unscreened’ Muslims Flooding U.S.

Photo Credit: WND

Photo Credit: WND

Muslim immigration from dangerous nations is dramatically higher in recent years, and government assurances that immigrants are being properly screened is “a farce,” according to accomplished author and columnist Paul Sperry.

“It’s a huge surge under Obama. In the last three years, he’s averaged 100,000 new immigrants from Muslim nations a year. That is very alarming. It’s more than we’re importing both from Central America and Mexico combined. This is a big shift in immigration flows,” said Sperry, who is the author of “Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington” and co-author of “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America.”

“It’s really insane what we’re doing. No one’s really talking about it, but this mass immigration from Muslim countries poses a serious national security threat,” said Sperry, who is also a Hoover Institution media fellow and former Washington bureau chief of WND. Sperry frequently writes for the New York Post and Investor’s Business Daily.

The stated reason for the influx in recent years is the rise in refugees from war-torn nations like Syria and Iraq. The number of people accepted from Syria in particular baffles Sperry, who said there is a long standing policy of keeping Syrians at bay.

“Syria has always been on our terrorist list,” he said. “We have had very strict restrictions on Syrian immigration. Since Syria’s become a failed state, Obama’s increased the number of refugees. By the time he leaves office, we will be importing over 10,000 Syrians into this country. This is a concern because Iraq and Syria are now controlled by the Islamic State.” (Read more from “Huge Surge of ‘Unscreened’ Muslims Flooding U.S.” HERE)

Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Obama: Tentative Iran Nuclear Deal ‘Best Option’ For Israel

President Obama Makes Statement On Nuclear Talks With IranPresident Barack Obama says that every path Iran had to develop a nuclear weapon will be cut off after a tentative nuclear deal was reached.

On Thursday, the United States, Iran and five other world powers announced an understanding outlining limits on Iran’s nuclear program so it cannot lead to atomic weapons, directing negotiators toward achieving a comprehensive agreement within three months.

“It is a good deal — a deal that meets our core objectives. This framework would cut off every pathway that Iran could take to develop a nuclear weapon,” Obama told reporters. “Iran will face strict limitations on its program and Iran has also agreed to the most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history. So this deal is not based on trust, it’s based on unprecedented verification.”

Obama stated that the deal is not based on trust, but on unprecedented verification.

“If Iran cheats, the world will know it. If we see something suspicious, we will inspect it.” Obama said, adding that “Iran will face more inspections than any other country in the world.” (Read more from “Obama: Tentative Iran Nuclear Deal ‘Best Option’ For Israel” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Meet Flakka, the Dangerous New Drug Sweeping Florida

Photo Credit: Time

Photo Credit: Time

Its effects can be as potent as crystal meth, bath salts or cocaine. It causes people to act erratically, uncontrollably and dangerously. It’s called flakka, and it’s the new designer drug hitting the streets of Florida.

In recent weeks in Florida, this new drug has led to a man trying to break down the door to a police station, a man impaling himself while trying to scale a fence, and an armed and naked man shouting about hallucinations from a rooftop, CBS reports.

The health effects of taking flakka, which can be injected, snorted, smoked or swallowed, can be dire.

“We’re starting to see a rash of cases of a syndrome referred to as excited delirium,” Jim Hall, an epidemiologist at the Center for Applied Research on Substance Use and Health Disparities at Nova Southeastern University, told CBS. “This is where the body goes into hyperthermia, generally a temperature of 105 degrees. The individual becomes psychotic, they often rip off their clothes and run out into the street violently and have an adrenaline-like strength and police are called and it takes four or five officers to restrain them. Then once they are restrained, if they don’t receive immediate medical attention they can die.” (Read more from “Meet Flakka, the Dangerous New Drug Sweeping Florida” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Democrats Still After Ammo for AR-15s

15We have to give the Democrats credit for persistence – they don’t give up when it comes to going after the Second Amendment. If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. In mid-March, only a few days after the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) indefinitely postponed its plan to ban common, green-tipped M855 ball ammo as “armor piercing,” Democrats in Congress decided to try it legislatively.

A few months ago, the ATF said it was considering removing a sporting exemption on the popular round. In late February and early March, word reached the media and the general public about the proposal and tens of thousands of angry gun owners flooded the ATF with emails, faxes and letters. Days before the comment period was over, the ATF announced it was indefinitely postponing the process though it said it would like to revisit the idea at an unspecified date. From there Democrats in Congress took up the torch.

U.S. Rep. Eliot Engel, a Democrat from New York, introduced his “Armor Piercing Bullets Act” to the House, appropriately enough in keeping with the insanity of the bill, on Friday, March 13. Engel’s bill goes much further than the ATF’s proposal would have gone as he would attempt to ban any ammunition that would go through the soft body armor worn by police.

That would effectively ban any Centerfire Rifle ammunition, as the bullet from any deer rifle will easily go through a bulletproof vest. Of course such a widespread ban would warm the heart of any gun banning liberal.

The ATF’s original rule change would have prevented the sale to civilians of one particular type of ball ammunition because these rounds can be used in “pistols” that shoot the 5.56/.223 round. These novelty weapons are essentially cut down AR-15s—they have AR-15 receivers and use the same magazines. These firearms are expensive, bulky, and not easily concealable, despite what Engels and his allies say.

There were repercussions for the administration from the ATF’s proposed rule change. The same day Engel propose his bill, ATF Director B. Todd Jones announced his resignation. Deputy Director Thomas E. Brandon will serve as acting director until a replacement is nominated. While he had already been planning to resign, it happened much sooner than expected.

It is hard to believe that Engels’ bill, and similar proposals by Senate Democrats, are serious efforts and not simply pre-election year efforts to fire up their base. 240 members of Congress, including five Senate Democrats, signed a letter objecting to the ban, so they must know the bill has little chance of passage, even if it has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee.

The response of congressional Republicans has been encouraging. Standing up for the Second Amendment is one of the few instances where they generally are reliably conservative, if only to keep their constituents quiet, if not happy. Rep. Tom Rooney of Florida introduced a bill to prohibit the ATF from creating any new restrictions on the manufacture, importation or sale of ammunition. If the numbers of Congressmen opposed to the ATF’s restriction is any indication, it should receive widespread support.

Congress is not the only place where there has been a pushback against the federal government’s efforts. The attorneys general of 23 states sent a letter to the ATF urging the agency not to attempt to ban the ammunition in the future.

This effort by the ATF and the Obama administration was beat back by a vigilant and engaged public, the formula that will be necessary to combat any future gun control legislation. (See, “Democrats Still After Ammo for AR-15s” originally posted HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

A Year After Firestorm, DHS Wants Access to License-Plate Tracking System

ScannerThe Department of Homeland Security is seeking bids from companies able to provide law enforcement officials with access to a national license-plate tracking system — a year after canceling a similar solicitation over privacy issues.

The reversal comes after officials said they had determined they could address concerns raised by civil liberties advocates and lawmakers about the prospect of the department’s gaining widespread access, without warrants, to a system that holds billions of records that reveal drivers’ whereabouts.

In a privacy impact assessment issued Thursday, the DHS says that it is not seeking to build a national database or contribute data to an existing system.

Instead, it is seeking bids from companies that already gather the data to say how much they would charge to grant access to law enforcement officers at Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a DHS agency. Officials said they also want to impose limits on ICE personnel’s access to and use of the data.

“These restrictions will provide essential privacy and civil liberty protections, while enhancing our agents’ and officers’ ability to locate and apprehend suspects who could pose a threat to national security and public safety,” DHS spokeswoman Marsha Catron said in a statement. The solicitation was posted publicly Thursday. (Read more from “A Year After Firestorm, DHS Wants Access to License-Plate Tracking System” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.