Neglecting Our Nukes – Now Vulnerable to Hackers?
On Oct. 23, 2010, at about 1:30 in the morning, the underground launch control centers at F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming lost communication with 50 Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles. Instead of showing the status of the missiles, the computer screens in the control centers displayed the acronym LFDN — Launch Facility Down.
Briefly losing contact with a few missiles wasn’t unusual. But having an entire squadron go down, simultaneously, was extraordinary. Closed-circuit television images of the missile silos, which sit miles away from their control centers, revealed that none of the Minuteman IIIs had lifted off. Almost an hour after the problem suddenly appeared, communication was re-established between the missiles and their launch crews. Nevertheless, heavily armed Air Force security officers spent the next few hours visiting all 50 silos, in the early morning darkness, to ensure that no security breach had occurred.
The Air Force dismissed the possibility that the computer network controlling its Minuteman IIIs had been hacked. The idea that a hacker could somehow disable 50 ballistic missiles — each of them armed with a nuclear warhead about seven times more powerful than the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima — seemed like the improbable plot of a Hollywood thriller.
An Air Force operations review board later found that the communications breakdown at F.E. Warren had been caused by a combination of equipment failure and human error: a circuit card, improperly installed in a weapons-system processor, had been dislodged by routine vibration and heat. But the incident privately raised concerns among high-level Air Force officials that America’s nuclear command-and-control system might not be secure against a cyberattack.
In fact, in January 2013, a Pentagon advisory group, the Defense Science Board, warned that the system’s vulnerability to such an attack had never been fully assessed. While testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee this past March, Gen. C. Robert Kehler, head of the U.S. Strategic Command, expressed confidence that America’s nuclear arsenal was well-protected against a cyberattack, and yet he acknowledged, “we don’t know what we don’t know.”
A world without nuclear weapons would, of course, eliminate the risk of accidental nuclear detonations. But that is an elusive goal, and until it’s achieved, America’s nuclear arsenal must be managed with the sort of ruthless efficiency and intolerance for error once championed by Curtis LeMay.
A world with many fewer weapons in fewer hands — carefully maintained, with no expense spared- – offers the best hope of avoiding mistakes whose consequences would be almost unimaginable. During his recent Senate testimony on command and control issues and the threat of cyberattacks, Kehler, the head of the U.S. Strategic Command, was asked whether Russia and China had the ability to prevent hackers from launching one of their nuclear missiles. Kehler paused for a moment and then replied, “Senator, I don’t know.”
Read more from this story HERE.
At least 12 people have been killed at a Navy building in Washington by a gunman who was later killed but may not have acted alone, authorities said.
The federal government has released documents that show Anwar al-Awlaki, the former Denver resident and onetime al-Qaida leader who was killed in 2011 in a U.S. missile strike in Yemen ordered by President Obama, was followed by the FBI to the doors of the Pentagon, where he was an invited guest.
On PBS’s “NewsHour” on Friday night, New York Times columnist David Brooks warned that Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz and similar legislators’ rise to prominence threatens the traditional Republican Party.