Photo Credit: AP

By Ben Terris. “The first time they close the cage behind you, I don’t care who you are, you still get this butterfly in your stomach and you think, ‘What in the world?’ ”Rep. Markwayne Mullin, a Republican from Oklahoma, is telling me about one of his previous jobs: professional mixed-martial-arts fighter.

“The first fight lasted about 45 seconds,” he said. “It was a fight I realized that I needed to pull weight. I fought out of fear more than anything else. I wanted to get in and out really quick.”

He won that fight. In fact, he won all of his five professional fights. But that doesn’t mean he didn’t leave the sport unscathed. Mullin has had operations on his shoulders, elbows, hip, knee, ankle, hands, and nose. And yet, he bristles at the violent image held by the sport.

“Mixed martial arts and fighting has a bad-boy image,” he said, sitting in his Washington office. Mullin is 35, with close-cropped hair, and looks like he still could be in fighting shape. “And rightfully so to some degree. That’s the way they promote the sport. But it’s really about discipline, about self-defense and respect.”

Nowadays, Mullin spends much of his time defending something else that conjures up its own violent images. It’s a topic right at the center of a national conversation, and one that Mullin finds many people are completely misunderstanding of: guns. Read more from this story HERE.

Tough Gun Votes Could End Careers on Capitol Hill

By Jill Lawrence. There aren’t too many votes with the potential to make or break a congressional career, but the upcoming gun-control showdown on Capitol Hill is one of them. For true believers aligned with their states, red or blue, the choice is easy. The rest could face difficult questions, such as “Am I willing to lose my job over this?” and “Will I be able to live with my vote?”

Rightly or wrongly, scores of defeats in the past 20 years have been blamed on votes that live in political infamy: Bill Clinton’s 1993 budget that raised taxes, the 10-year assault-weapons ban passed in 1994, the 2008 Troubled Asset Relief Program (better known as the bank bailout), and the 2010 Affordable Care Act (better known as Obamacare).

Support for gun control in particular is perceived as a career killer, largely because of the outsized reputation of the National Rifle Association. The group’s electoral record isn’t as bulletproof as you might think. As Dorothy Samuels noted in The New York Times in 2009, several factors contributed to the Republican sweep of 1994. Clinton went on to highlight his gun-control successes in his winning 1996 campaign. And four years later, gun-rights stalwarts backed by the NRA lost to Democrats in Senate elections in Florida, Michigan, Missouri, and Washington.

So you can buck the NRA and win. That could be particularly true this year, when the NRA is on the wrong side of public-opinion polls that show nine in 10 Americans support universal background checks for prospective gun buyers. Still, crossing the NRA is not risk-free. It could encourage primary challenges next year against Republicans. It could also boost GOP odds in conservative states now represented by Democrats, such as Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Mark Pryor of Arkansas.

But voting the NRA line isn’t entirely without risk, either. Lawmakers could be accused of doing the bidding of a group so far right that it even opposes a new bipartisan compromise to close major loopholes in the background-check system. Or, as former Republican Rep. Joe Scarborough put it this week on his MSNBC show, Morning Joe: “If you’re Kay Hagan in North Carolina and you’re Mary Landrieu and you’re running for reelection (next) year, do you really want to go to women’s groups and say, ‘You know, I didn’t have the courage to vote to make sure we could have criminal background checks so rapists couldn’t go and buy guns?’ ” He went on to say that “anybody that votes against criminal background checks” is basically saying “let’s give them a free pass” to buy guns. Read more from this story HERE.