Weiner’s NY District elects Republican Turner in special election

It is time for Democrats across the United States to panic, as a Congressional district that has not elected a Republican in almost 90 years handed an easy victory to the GOP candidate. The victor Bob Turner cast his effort as a referendum on President Obama, a chance to send a message to Washington. As the Washington Post put it, “President Obama suffered a sharp rebuke Tuesday when voters in New York elected a conservative Republican to represent a Democratic district that has not been in GOP hands since the 1920.

In 2010, Anthony Weiner won the district by almost 20 points, while Turner’s margin is 8 points, so a 27% reduction in the Democrat’s vote share has happened. Every Democrat in the House of Representatives and Senate (not mention at the state and local level) has to be doing the mental math, and wondering if they will looking for work as a lobbyist in 2013.

Richard Baehr notes: “Dems outspent the GOP in New York 9 by almost 10 to 1. Not much to show for it. The Republican Jewish Committee spent some money, but the GOP House committee did not. SEIU was out in force yesterday as well as teacher union people. All to no avail. It looks like Turner won the Jewish vote.”

Of course, Democrats are lamely attempting to spin. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, chair of the DNC: It’s a very difficult district for Democrats,” said Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, noting its Democratic margins there tend to be the second lowest of all the districts in New York City.

It’s so difficult for Democrats that in a bad year for Democrats (2010), the Democrat only won by 20 points. I would love to hear what DWS hears from her House colleagues who won by less than 20 points in 2010.

Read More at American Thinker By Thomas Lifson, American Thinker

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Perry: Romney Sounds Like a Liberal

A day after they clashed at a GOP presidential debate, Texas Gov. Rick Perry told conservatives in rival Mitt Romney’s home state that their former governor sounds like a liberal.

And without naming him directly, Perry said Romney has changed his position on Social Security.

“Other candidates in this race have used words like ‘fraud’ and compared it to a criminal enterprise,” Perry said, referencing language Romney used in his book to discuss issues involving Social Security. “Under the media spotlight, they change their tune and they start sounding like liberals.”

Perry made the comments at a dinner hosted by a Massachusetts conservative think tank, roughly a mile from Romney’s campaign headquarters.

He did not clarify how Romney sounds like a liberal, nor did he take questions from voters or reporters.

Read More at Newsmax

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Third Rail Unplugged

For decades now political consultants, especially those of the Florida sub-species, have been able to charge big bucks to advise Republican candidates not to say anything about Social Security during campaigns. It’s the “third rail” of politics, they breathlessly warn. Touch it and your political career goes up in smoke.

On the other side, consultants have cashed in advising Democrats to attack all Republican candidates on Social Security, early and often — to charge that these heartless villains are constantly conniving to snatch your widowed mother’s Social Security check from her arthritic fingers, regardless of what these candidates have really said or done on this issue. The Democrats’ court eunuchs in the main(left)-stream media have been happy enough act as megaphones for this scam.

This strategy — duck and cover on one side, Big Lie on the other — enjoyed some plausibility for the longest time. Countless candidates over the years found that just mentioning the words “Social Security” in Florida lost them more votes than mentioning the word “education” gained them. After all, Florida has the highest percentage of residents aged 65 or over — 17.4 percent — of any state. (If you must know — West By-God Virginia is second at 16 percent, Maine third at 15.9. Alaska has the fewest wrinklies at 7.7 percent. I can use that word because I turn 69 next month.)

But then the ideas of Marx, Darwin, and Freud also had some surface plausibility when they were first sprung on an unsuspecting world. And we wasted most of a century taking them seriously. But we’ve pretty much — save for in faculty lounges, news rooms, and behind some pulpits — de-constructed these three quacks. And it’s time to unplug the third rail too. A Florida Senate candidate showed us how last year.

The candidate who wrote the new rules for political discussion of Social Security is now U.S. Senator Marco Rubio of Florida. He didn’t just touch the third rail. He grabbed it. And he wasn’t electrocuted.

 Read More at The American Spectator By Larry Thornberry, The American Spectator

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Maxine Waters is Right: Obama’s Jobs Plan Stinks

Of California’s 12.1 percent unemployed, not many of them are teachers. Teachers here, thanks to their powerful public employee union, are doing pretty good, pulling down well above average wages and excessive pension rights that taxpayers really cannot afford, which contribute mightily to our state government’s perpetual debt crisis, itself a huge drag on the economy in general. Yet of the unemployed in California, almost 35% are young people in the recent high school graduate age category who are without work. Of those, about half of young black males are unemployed in California – three years into Barrack Obama’s presidency. Over 21% of black Californians in general are unemployed. Where is their hope in Obama’s plan for a job? Well, they have very little hope under Obama.

The Obama national jobs plan outlined this week is pretty simple: hire more teachers. But of course unemployed young black men in California don’t have the college education to qualify for the necessary teaching credential. Oh, and Obama’s plan calls for continuing to pour more concrete in government road projects. However, unemployed young black men, being new to the workforce, don’t have the skills to get admitted into the construction trade unions that might benefit from more stimulus spending on road construction, let alone the seniority in the union to actually get hired to work on a project. Obama’s plan for small business is to offer more loan programs through the Small Business Administration. However, what small businesses need is tax relief incentives to do more hiring, not bureaucratic loan programs that take weeks to apply forandcomplete the application forms and even then are impossible to meet the qualification regulations. Not much hope there for any employment boost, including for black and Hispanic youth, where the unemployment problem is worst.

It is this dirth of a real jobs program that has prompted California Congresswoman Maxine Walters to call out Obama and say, “treat blacks like they were from Iowa!”, meaning, give them the same special attention that the presidential candidates are giving to the citizens of America’s earliest presidential primary state. Record unemployment levels in California call for attention to the unemployed across the board, not just black unemployed, but there is no denying that among black and Hispanic youth the problem is most acute. Walters and Obama’s problem, along with many leaders in the minority communities, is their lack of willingness to embrace new,targeted solutions in the minority communities, such as the “enterprise zones” called for by famous economist Dr. Arthur Laffer, which would eliminate job killing Federal and state regulations in designated urban areas to draw capital investment and new job growth. But more than one black economic writer has blasted the idea as “ghettoizing” and leading to creation of “sweatshops” instead of new jobs. Union rhetoric. So the stasis of ideas simply leads to new extensions of Federal and state unemployment compensation, leading to even more government debt, and undoubtedly sets a stage for more youth crime, leading to a host of other undesirable outcomes for the people affected, and for taxpayers.

Reaction on Capitol Hill to Obama’s new jobs plan has been to see it for what it is: just more politics. Obama is simply pandering to his public employee union supporters and giving himself an excuse on his dismal jobs performance when the Republican House of Representatives ultimately decides most of the plan is worthless. Regardless, even people who should be Obama’s core supporters, like California’s Maxine Walters, can see that his economic policies are not “creating jobs”. And the deeper analysis is that Obama’s policies are destroying wealth, and without wealth, there can be no money in the private sector to hire anybody, let alone youth unemployed.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read More at CA Political Review By James V. Lacy, California Political Review

 

 

 

 

 

Videos: Obama Lied About Troops on the Ground in Libya

This author has observed, “If the media wanted to conserve resources, they could simply fuse the words ‘The Obama administration lied’ to the opening line of each day’s edition and fill in the blank appropriately.” Today proved no exception. Despite President Barack Obama’s assurances that no ground troops would ever be sent to Libya, the Pentagon confirmed Monday that U.S. soldiers are on the ground.

Four servicemen landed in Tripoli over the weekend. The newly elected commander of the Tripoli Military Council, Abdel Hakim Belhaj (aka Abu Abdullah al-Sadiq), is an al-Qaeda asset and founder of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) who twice met with Osama bin Laden. Belhaj has claimed U.S. agents tortured him for days, but he does “not want revenge.”

Pentagon spokesman Capt. John Kirby refused to answer whether Obama would send additional troops to the region.

This contrasts with Obama’s pledge on March 18, as he launched his war-by-decree, when he stated, “The United States is not going to deploy ground troops into Libya.” A few days later, Obama reaffirmed, “I said that America’s role would be limited, that we would not put ground troops into Libya…Tonight, we are fulfilling that pledge.”

White House officials have insisted this weekend’s deployment in no way constitutes a violation of Obama’s no-troops promise, because these soldiers are only assigned to determine whether it is safe for U.S. diplomats to return to the country. However, they are armed and may defend themselves if attacked.

Read More at Floyd Reports By Ben Johnson, The White House Watch

Europe Facts, Not Fiction: Usage Of ECB Deposit Facility Goes Parabolic, Sov CDS Wider Across The Board

While the market continues to trade purely on rumor, counter-rumor and refutation of a refutation, the facts demonstrate that Europe is ugly and getting worse. Today’s now daily update focuses on continuing deterioration in both liquidity and solvency. First, the usage of the ECB Deposit Facility soared to €198 billion on Monday from €182 billion on Friday. This is a massive €118 billion increase in the past month alone. As the chart below demonstrates, a good word to describe the chart is parabolic. Furthermore, USD Libor continues to rise and has now risen nearly 40 days in a row. While not nearly parabolic, it is time to shift attention away from Credit Agricole, which is still the most “funding challenged”, and focus on CSFB which once again rose by 0.01%, and threatens to overtake the troubled French bank in pole position. Time to refocus the shorts from France to Switzerland? Lastly, the CDS are ugly across the board.

 Read More at zerohedge.com

Keep your “bulwarks” Barry and just SHOOT THE BUNNY: America needs fuel not tree hugging smugness

The recent Texaswildfires have consumed nearly 4600 square miles of vegetation destroyed over 1000 homes and taken several lives. If only Texas´ (not to mentionArizona,Californiaand New Mexico´s) forests could have been systematically harvested to help our economy!

Unfortunately, this isn’t the case as Obama´s Director of the Bureau of Land Management, Bob Abbey, has opposed recent legislation proposed under H.R. 1581 (The Wilderness and Roadless Area Release Act of 2011) sponsored by Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.). Abbey, it appears, is going for the jugular to rouse a nation impervious to 9% plus unemployment and defend the environment by comparing this GOP initiative to: “…shooting a small rabbit with a large gun, leaving almost no meat on the bone.”

At stake is lifting Forest Service protections to nearly 36 million acres of inventoried road-less lands as well as compelling the Bureau of Land Management to release over 6 million acres of Wilderness Study Areas to permit mineral development, and thinning forest areas to obtain economic benefit and logging. But according to Harris Sherman, Undersecretary for Natural Resources and Environment at the Agriculture Department, so called “road-less areas” “ …support biodiversity and contribute habitat for one- fourth of federally listed species ….while serving as a ´bulwark´ against nonnative and invasive species.”

For those who can live without “bulwarks” on approximately 65,600 square miles (aland mass nearly as big as Washington State) that render huge swaths of territory propitious for the propagation of such bambi like creatures as grizzlies, mountain lions and coyotes (spotted in such remote places as Manhattan) then you’re in for some news if not rabbit meat. Established technology enables one to pelletize (if not make into firewood) this endless font of biomass that could otherwise fuel out of control house burning wildfires.

For a mere $43,900 an entrepreneur can obtain equipment to produce wood/cellulose pellets to sell to local buyers for home heating. Logging corporations, no doubt, make heftier investments and would be delighted to start building lumber access roads to help Obama have some “shovel ready” jobs to brag about creating.

Read More at Coach is Right By Carlos Calianka, Coach is Right

On 9/12 We Ran to God

On 9/11 we ran for cover. On 9/12 we ran to God. Churches overflowed. Synagogues were packed. Sanctuaries and temples swelled to capacity. Four thousand people gathered in a Manhattan Cathedral. A New York City church filled and emptied six times in one day. Street vendors were replaced by prayer counselors who stood beneath banners that read: “We will pray for you.”
Across the country, congregations hastily assembled post-attack prayer services. We did in San Antonio, Texas. “Come and Pray for Peace” our outdoor sign invited. You would have thought it was Easter Sunday. Standing Room Only.

Ironic. Usama Bin Laden intended to bring America to her knees, and he did—we prayed. What does this say about us? At least this much: we are a spiritual people. For all our talk about secularism, self-reliance and self-sufficiency, where we do we turn in turbulence? We turn to God.

We find Him to be — to use the old coinage –“an anchor of the soul” (Heb. 6:10). Everyone anchors to something. A retirement account, a resume. A person or a position. “When the storm comes,” they say, “this will get me through.”

On 9/11 we turned to the sturdiest anchor of all: God. Only He promises to secure our most precious commodity — our souls. When God breathed into Adam, he gave him more than oxygen; he gave him an eternal essence. He gave you the same. Because of your soul, you wrestle with right and wrong, value the lives of others and get choked up at the singing of our national anthem. The soul is that part of you dares to believe that good comes out of evil, Right still sits on the throne and the next life will make sense of this one.

Follow Joe Miller at Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Read More at Fox News By Max Lucado, Fox News

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A botched 9/11 commemoration

Count me out from those who would conclude that we got it just right in marking the 10th anniversary of 9/11. We got it only half right — the well-deserved honors to the nearly 3,000 victims, the formal and informal remembrances of who they were and what a great loss they were to family, friends and acquaintances. They fully merited all the solemn attention and resolve to never forget them.

But what was missing was what should have been the other half of the 9/11 commemoration — reminders of who exactly the 19 plane hijackers were, where they came from, what animated them to make such a gross and vicious attack on the very heart of America. In reading the papers and watching the TV news, I didn’t find any comparable reminders of Mohammed Atta, the leader of the hijackers who piloted the first plane into the World Trade Center. Where did he come from and what drove him to suicidal destruction of America’s crown jewels? What exactly was his agenda? Why were most of the hijackers Saudis? What does it teach us about what was inculcated in them?

And most important, has their jihadist agenda against the West expanded or ebbed in the last 10 years? While there was no second 9/11 during the last 10 years, how many Mohammed Attas are still being nurtured and groomed in Pakistan and Afghanistan, to say nothing of Yemen, Gaza, the West Bank, Algeria, Lebanon, and Muslim enclaves in France, Germany and, yes, even in the good old USA?

All that seemed to have fallen victim to institutional amnesia and a collective media decision not to touch that half of 9/11 lest they be accused of Isalmophobia.

My guess is that the victims of 9/11 would not have wanted such a politically correct, half-baked commemoration in their honor. Certainly not the passengers aboard the plane that went down in Pennsylvania who showed far more guts and moral clarity than their mourners today.

Read More at American Thinker By Leo Rennert, American Thinker

Barone: Obama buys the drinks other guys pay for

What is there to say about Barack Obama’s speech to Congress Thursday night and the so-called American Jobs Act he said Congress must pass? Several thoughts occur, all starting with P.

Projection. That’s psychologist-speak term for projecting your own faults on others. “This isn’t political grandstanding,” Obama told members of Congress, as Republicans snickered (but thankfully resisted the temptation to shout, “You lie!”). “This isn’t class warfare.”

These sentences came four paragraphs after Obama insisted that “the most affluent citizens and corporations” should pay more taxes (which spurs job creation how?) and not long before he promised to “take that message to every corner of the country.”

Lest there be any doubt about Obama’s real intentions, consider that his speech was obviously modeled on Harry Truman’s call for a special session of the Republican Congress in the summer of 1948 so he could campaign against it. And consider that Obama pointedly refused to rebuke Jim Hoffa’s “let’s take these sons of bitches out” — meaning Republicans — when he introduced him last Monday in Detroit.

Pragmatism. Perceptive writers like David Brooks of the New York Times told us in 2008 that Obama was basically a pragmatist, a slave to no ideology but simply a student of what works. Brooks was apparently impressed by Obama’s mention of Edmund Burke and the sharp crease in his pants.

Read More at The Washington Examiner  By Michael Barone, The Washington Examiner