On Sunday night’s episode of Life, Liberty & Levin on Fox News, LevinTV host Mark Levin was joined by constitutional expert and former federal Judge Michael McConnell to discuss how the framers constitution really intended for impeachment to work.

During the discussion, McConnell — who is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and director of Stanford University’s constitutional law program — explained that impeachment is far more than just a political issue, or at least that’s what the framers intended for it to be.

“The phrase ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ was specifically chosen to be a very high bar” for impeachment, McConnell explained. “And the reason for that is that our framers wanted the president to be independent of Congress. One of the main functions of the president was to be a check, one of the checks and balances against Congress, which they thought — you know, perhaps inaccurately — was going to be by far the most powerful and most dangerous branch of government.”

“So they did not want Congress to be able to toss the president out on the basis of any low standard at all,” McConnell continued, so they deliberately chose the phrase ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’ which had a history in the common law, because it referred to misdeeds of a public nature of a very serious sort amounting to abuse of power.”

Some proponents of impeaching President Trump have made the case that such proceedings are more about politics than they are about law, like a Vox op-ed from 2017 on the subject, which referred to previous presidential impeachments as “trivial acts of political vengeance.”

Earlier this year, House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., publicly said that impeachment was a “political act” and rested upon the “will of the American people” while explaining the supposed justification for impeachment proceedings against the president.

In contrast to these ideas, Levin asked the constitutional scholar about how this view played out during the Constitutional convention, specifically bringing up a dispute between James Madison and George Mason over whether or not impeachment should happen over charges of “maladministration” — i.e., doing a bad job.

“George Mason proposed that the president be impeachable for ‘maladministration’ and Madison objected to that, saying that that would effectively make him serve at the pleasure of the Senate — meaning that they could get rid of him whenever they wanted to and that would destroy his independence,” McConnell explained. “It’s pretty clear that Madison, at least, believed that the president needed to be insulated from impeachment for anything that isn’t really truly a high crime or misdemeanor.”

The two also went on to discuss House Democrats’ recent efforts to impeach President Trump and subpoena his tax records and members of his administration. (For more from the author of “The Framers Never Intended for Impeachment to Be a Political Weapon, Former Federal Judge Says” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Accusations against Donald Trump today are actually a Hollywood remake of the great “Reagan – Iran Collusion Scandal” of the 1980s. Democrats were just as convinced that Ronald Reagan was an illegitimate President because Reagan stole the 1980 election. Reagan couldn’t have been a better president than Carter. He must have conspired with Iran’s Ayatollahs to delay the release of hostages from the U.S. Embassy in order to manipulate the election campaign. Democrats really do believe in recycling.

The Democrats just took control of the U.S. House of Representatives by 235 Democrats to 199 Republicans. The House will (predicts this author) hold impeachment hearings of Donald Trump and will hold a vote to impeach under the Democrats in 2019 through early 2020.

Articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump were immediately filed on Thursday, January 3, 2019, on the first day of the new session of Congress. Congressmen Brad Sherman (D-CA) (Northridge near Los Angeles) and Al Green (D-TX) re-filed their Articles of Impeachment they had previously filed in the last session of Congress on July 12, 2017.

Later that evening, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) — a Palestinian-American women — declared that the Democrats will impeach Trump: Tlaib quoted her son telling her, “Mama, look, you won. Bullies don’t win.” And then she said, “’Baby, they don’t.’ Because we’re gonna go in there, we’re gonna impeach the motherf@@@er.”

Rep. Tlaib was handed the microphone at a celebration about the Democrats taking over the House at a reception thrown by the leftist group MoveOn.org. Long-term political junkies will recall that MoveOn.org was created to stop the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton. The group urged that the country should “move on” from Bill and Hillary Clinton’s dozens of felonies in the 1990s (like selling nuclear missile guidance technology to China in return for millions of dollars of illegal foreign campaign contributions) and focus on the nation’s important issues. Al Gore famously held a fund-raiser at a temple for monks sworn to poverty, clearly strawmen for money illegally donated from China. MoveOn.org argued that we should focus on the nation’s problems, not the Clintons’ and Al Gore’s crime spree. Yet on Thursday the MoveOn.org crowd roared approval Thursday night for talk of impeaching Trump.

Democrat leaders know better. They know it will be disastrous for their party. They know it will probably cost them the 2020 elections, both presidential and congressional. But the Democrats just can’t help themselves. It will be like daring a teenage boy to jump off the roof into an above-ground swimming pool. The Leftist activists will demand it. And Democrats just really want to down deep. [Update: Billionaire Tom Steyer’s campaign to impeach Trump has garnered 6,615,331 petition signers calling for Trump’s impeachment. No matter how much Democrats know impeachment will create a back-lash politically, they will not be able to resist so many of their supporters, that big of an activist mailing list, or Steyer’s political warchest.]

They can’t escape the fact that Democrats filed for impeachment before any report or results from Special Counsel Robert Mueller. So how credible can their claims be? Sherman and Green first filed their Articles of Impeachment in June 2017.

The grounds for impeachment Sherman and Green argue is that Donald Trump fired former FBI Director James Comey. The evidence keeps growing that Comey deserved to be fired. The only wrong is that Trump did not fire Comey on day one.

But this is all astonishingly similar to 1981 when Democrats were dreaming up excuses for losing the White House — to an actor! “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it,” warned writer and philosopher George Santayana (also credited as “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”).

They all mocked Ronald Reagan as a buffoon who had co-starred with a chimpanzee in “Bedtime for Bonzo.” Democrats, the overwhelmingly-dominant liberal news media back then, political experts, etc. portrayed Reagan the candidate as an ignorant conservative with primitive views who did not read or know anything. (And where politicos insist that Trump is unacceptable because we need a dignified president like Reagan, Reagan actually actually did co-star with a chimp. He was still a great president.)

So, then how could Democrats accept when Reagan defeated the saintly, wise, morally superior Jimmy Carter? When the Left demonizes and belittles a Republican during a campaign, how can they then explain it away when the Republican wins? Election after election, after telling the American people how awful the Republican candidate is, Democrats are in a bind when that Republican gets elected.

So in 1981 Democrats invented a conspiracy theory of collusion between Iran’s Ayatollahs and the Reagan campaign: Yes, supposedly-serious Democrats firmly believed this. The Reagan campaign entered into a secret pact with the Ayatollah Khomeini to keep the Iranian hostage crisis alive to embarrass Jimmy Carter through election day. See: John Barry, “Making of a Myth,” Newsweek, November 10, 1991.

In 1979, after President Jimmy Carter helped create the Iranian Islamic revolution through foreign policy blunders empowering Islamic revolutionaries, militant Iranian students took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. Fifty-two U.S. citizens, most of them diplomats and staff of the Embassy, were held hostage for 444 days. Iran released the hostages immediately after Reagan was sworn in as President.

In the absence of any evidence, Democrats decided that Reagan campaign official William Casey must have flown to Madrid from a conference in London to hold a secret meeting with Iranian interests. Casey must have convinced Iran to not release the hostages until after the election. It could not be that Iran released the hostages because they feared and respected in-coming President Reagan’s tough-line foreign policy. It could not be that strong men do not respect apologizing and weak liberals like Jimmy Carter.

Of course, Ronald Reagan’s Attorney General Edwin Meese III did not recuse himself thereby handing power to the entrenched deep state to indulge the hoax. Nor did Meese — despite being a mild-mannered gentleman — have the lapse in judgment to appoint a Special Counsel to look into a clear falsehood.

This story has been now reborn with astonishing similarity in a conspiracy theory that Donald Trump’s private lawyer Michael Cohen flew to the gloriously-beautiful city of Prague. The Hollywood remake of the 1981 story is that Cohen meet with someone “near Prague” with poorly-defined “ties” to poorly-defined “Russian interests.” In my heart if not in employment, this author is a scientist. If you can’t define something, you can’t prove it. As a lawyer, it is a red-flag when a concept is suggested that is so vague it is impossible to prove or disprove. What are “ties?” What are “interests?” This is scurrilous slander, not serious discussion.

The fact that there was no evidence that William Casey ever flew to Madrid led to the “obvious” conclusion that Casey must have been smuggled on a military jet fighter leaving no paper trail (while Reagan was a private citizen).

The lack of any evidence that Michael Cohen ever visited Prague does not dampen the spirits of Trump’s accusers either. The fact that it would be physically impossible for non-Russian computer hackers with vague “ties” to unidentified “Russian interests” to transfer 2 gigabytes of data over the internet from the Democrat National Committee’s computers in only 87 seconds doesn’t arouse any curiosity. The DNC’s refusal to allow the FBI or any government investigator to examine the DNC’s computers to investigate the alleged hacking does nothing to discourage the conspiracy theorists.

It is important to see how nearly every criticism of any Republican candidate or official is a rerun. When political insiders merely dust off old claims, cross out the old name, and scribble in a new name, can it really be all that convincing? Can nearly the same story be true again and again? (For more from the author of “The Impeachment Games: Now It Begins” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE