Posts

False Alarm: House GOP Caved on Impeaching IRS Commissioner After Mere Hours

The House GOP caved on demanding a vote to impeach IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. Late Wednesday night, Politico reported:

“House Freedom Caucus Chairman Jim Jordan and Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte have reached a tentative compromise to postpone a vote to impeach the IRS commissioner, sources familiar with the talks told POLITICO.

“Under the terms of the emerging deal, IRS Commissioner John Koskinen would testify before the Judiciary panel next Wednesday, and any impeachment vote would likely be postponed until after the November election rather than take place on Thursday, the sources said.”

In the late afternoon Wednesday, Freedom Caucus Reps. Jim Jordan, R-OH (A, 94%), Mark Meadows, R-N.C. (A, 93%), and Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan. (A, 91%) spoke to reporters about their effort to impeach IRS commissioner John Koskinen for lying to Congress and destroying 24,000 emails relating to Lois Lerner’s targeting of conservative groups.

Jordan stated that the group was “strong on every count” against Koskinen, who was brought on as IRS Commissioner in the wake of the political targeting scandal in 2013. Koskinen was under three preservation orders and two subpoenas while the IRS destroyed 24,000 emails and 422 backup records with evidence that the IRS targeted conservative groups.

Jordan told reporters that the impeachment measure has been on the table for a year, but Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va. (D, 66%), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has been reluctant to proceed with impeachment hearings. House GOP leadership has also been reluctant to go forward with impeachment before an election, despite the fact that the IRS continued to cover up the political targeting of conservative groups under Koskinen.

With the inaction from Goodlatte and House GOP leadership, Reps. John Fleming, R-La. (B, 86%) and Huelskamp introduced a privileged resolution to impeach Koskinen on Tuesday, meaning the House must hold a vote within 48 hours unless the resolution is withdrawn.

On late Wednesday afternoon, when the Freedom Caucus members met with reporters to discuss the resolution, they expected a vote to happen the next morning. Less than five hours later though, they reached an agreement with House leadership, negotiated by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C. (B, 87%), to hold off on the privileged resolution until the lame-duck session —when it’s more politically expedient for moderate GOP members, and to have Koskinen testify under oath in front of the Judiciary Committee.

Jordan, Meadows, and Huelskamp agreed on Wednesday that in a case like Koskinen’s, where it is clear that the First Amendment rights of Americans were trampled on in an overreach of bureaucratic power and then covered up, it is proper and necessary that the House invokes impeachment. The Founding Fathers clearly thought that impeachment power should be used by Congress to keep abuse of power in check, which is why impeachment is mentioned in “The Federalist Papers” 58 times.

Instead of properly utilizing the power constitutionally granted to it, Congress has become the most ineffectual branch of government in the past few decades — well, maybe 14 decades. As George Will pointed out in National Review, it’s been 140 years since the House impeached a member of the executive branch. When Congress is ineffectual, the executive and judicial branches become more and more powerful, which is why, in 2016, we have a near-unaccountable president and activist judges.

As Rep. Huelskamp said of House Republicans yesterday, “How can you look someone in the eye and tell them you’re the backstop of the constitution, and you’re not willing to vote on this?” (For more from the author of “False Alarm: House GOP Caved on Impeaching IRS Commissioner After Mere Hours” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

New Poll: 70 Percent Want Congress to Keep Probing IRS

Credit - AP

Credit – AP

By Dana Blanton

Most American voters want Congress to keep investigating the IRS targeting of conservative political groups, according to the latest Fox News poll.

Seventy percent say the IRS investigation should last until “someone is held accountable.” That’s down from a high of 78 percent in June 2013. About one in five thinks it is time to move on (22 percent).

Click here for the poll results.

Call it a “kumbaya” question, as majorities of Democrats (60 percent), independents (75 percent) and Republicans (78 percent) support lawmakers continuing to dig.

The new poll also asked why the White House is refusing to release thousands of pages of documents related to the IRS targeting. By nearly three-to-one people think it’s because the administration wants to keep its role in the scandal secret (63 percent) rather than to keep taxpayer information confidential (22 percent).

Read more from this story HERE.

_____________________________________________________________________________

New Lois Lerner emails indicate Obama’s DOJ involved in IRS targeting scandal

By Noah Rothman

In the month prior to the 2010 midterm elections, Internal Revenue Service investigator Lois Lerner met with Justice Department officials to discuss the criminal prosecution of tax-exempt political groups.

It had previously been revealed that Lerner investigated avenues for prosecuting certain tax-exempt status applicants upon the suggestion of Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) when the watchdog group Judicial Watch obtained Lerner’s emails on that subject via a FOIA request.

The email, dated May 8, 2013, revealed some coordination between Lerner and the Department of Justice:

I got a call today from Richard Pilger Director Elections Crimes Branch at DOJ, I know him from contacts from my days there. He wanted to know who at IRS the DOJ folk s [sic] could talk to about Sen. Whitehouse idea at the hearing that DOJ could piece together false statement cases about applicants who “lied” on their 1024s –saying they weren’t planning on doing political activity, and then turning around and making large visible political expenditures. DOJ is feeling like it needs to respond, but want to talk to the right folks at IRS to see whether there are impediments from our side and what, if any damage this might do to IRS programs.

But new emails obtained from the Justice Department by Judicial Watch, heavily redacted and procured only as a result of a court order, indicate that Lerner had been investigating the potential for prosecuting tax-exempt applicants two years before she admitted to inappropriate targeting. Lerner went so far as to have an in-person meeting at DOJ to discuss the subject.

Read more from this story HERE.