Posts

Congressman: Democrats Know Constitution ‘Was Violated’ but ‘Don’t Care’

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, charged in a speech on the House floor Tuesday that Democrats knew the U.S. Constitution was violated in the 2020 election but simply don’t care.

A joint session of Congress is scheduled for 1 p.m. Eastern today to certify the Electoral College votes from each state, and more than 100 House Republicans and a dozen senators plan to object.

“Democrats don’t care. They don’t want to look into it. They’d rather just belittle 60 million of our fellow citizens, call them names, say it’s a conspiracy, make fun of the very people we’re all supposed to represent,” he said.

Jordan promised that the challenges in Congress on Wednesday will present a “chance to hear the truth.”

“During the campaign, Vice President Biden would get 55 people at an event. President Trump got 55,000 at just one rally,” he said. “President Trump increased his vote with African-Americans, increased his vote with Hispanic Americans, won 19 of 20 bellwether counties, won Ohio by eight, Iowa by eight, Florida by three, got 11 million more votes than he got in 2016. And House Republicans won 27 of 27 tossup races. But somehow, somehow, Joe Biden, the guy who barely left his house, won the election? (Read more from “Congressman: Democrats Know Constitution ‘Was Violated’ but ‘Don’t Care'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

GOP Lawmaker: Big Tech ‘Out to Get’ Conservatives

By New York Post. Big Tech is “out to get” conservatives, Rep. Jim Jordan said in explosive opening remarks Wednesday as the CEOs of companies including Facebook and Amazon faced a Congressional grilling.

“I’ll just cut to the chase: Big Tech is out to get conservatives,” said the Ohio Republican with trademark zeal. “That’s not a suspicion, that’s not a hunch. That’s a fact.”

Jordan rattled off a series of double-standards in which the online voices of conservatives, including President Trump, have been silenced, while others have not been similarly restricted.

“The power these companies have to impact what happens during the election … [and] what American citizens get to see prior to their voting is pretty darn important,” said Jordan. . .

“Being big is not inherently bad. Quite the opposite. In America, you should be rewarded for success,” said Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisconsin) in his opening remarks. “[However], I share the concern that market dominance in the digital space is ripe for abuse, particularly when it comes to free speech.” (Read more from “GOP Lawmaker: Big Tech ‘Out to Get’ Conservatives” HERE)

_____________________________________________________

Zuckerberg Defends Instagram Acquisition, Cook Says All Apps Treated Equally

By CNBC. Rep. Jerry Nadler, D.-NY, on Wednesday drilled Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for the social network’s 2012 acquisition of Instagram.

“The documents you provided tell a very disturbing story, and that story is that Facebook saw Instagram as a powerful threat that could siphon business away from Facebook,” Nadler said during the House Antitrust Subcommittee. “Rather than compete with it, Facebook bought it. This is exactly the type of anticompetitive acquisition that antitrust laws were designed to prevent.” . . .

“At the time, almost no one thought of them as a general social network or competing with us in that space,” Zuckerberg said. “The acquisition has been wildly successful.” . . .

Georgia Rep. Hank Johnson pressed Cook on whether the App Store treats all app developers equally. When Johnson asked if Apple employs two people to help Chinese search engine Baidu help navigate the store, Cook said he did not know.

Johnson also asked about a recent agreement that would allow Apple users to rent movies on Amazon Prime without using Apple’s in-app payment mechanism, which takes a 30% cut of sales, and whether other app makers could enter into the same arrangement. (Read more from “Zuckerberg Defends Instagram Acquisition, Cook Says All Apps Treated Equally” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Unreliable Sources? New Jim Jordan ‘Scandal’ Story Doesn’t Hold up

You may have thought that the abuse “scandal” that broke over Independence Day weekend about Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, was already dead. Guess again.

The stories at NBC and New York Magazine focus on text messages sent to Dunyasha Yetts and Mike Disabato, who both wrestled at Ohio State during Jordan’s tenure as an assistant coach, from Russ Hellickson – a former Olympic silver medalist who was head wrestling coach at the time. The accusers claim that Hellickson tried to pressure them to recant their stories, and that he was under pressure from Jordan to do so.

The first lesson is that you never want to send any written communication, whether it be text, email, or social media direct message, that you wouldn’t want on the front page of your local paper or read aloud in a deposition. After all, it just might.

But let’s get back to business and take a look at the evidence, shall we?

In the only message that was shown in screenshot, Hellickson responds to a long text from Yetts by saying that he was sorry that his former wrestler “got caught up in this media train.”

“If you think the story got told wrong about Jim,” the messages continue, “you could probably write a statement for release that tells your story and corrects what you feel bad about.”

Later, a text from Hellickson reads, “Do not talk to any media. People will call you to convince you I said to talk. No no no[.]” Look, that’s crisis communications 101 and about as surprising as the headline “Dog Wags Tail.”

The screenshots can be viewed here.

As far as Hellickson saying that he was under pressure to get accusers to recant? You know, the actual “story” part of the story? Those allegedly took place in a phone call that happened later, so it hinges completely on whether or not the reader trusts the accusers in the first place.

And thus, we’re back to the initial problem with this whole scandal: The two accusers at the root of all this do not appear to be trustworthy, as Chris Pandolfo and I explained when this whole thing started.

Of course, the New York Magazine story pre-empts this in Yetts’ case with the following:

Yetts said that after he declined to take back his allegations, Jordan’s allies began attacking him for his admission that he served 18 months in prison for bilking investors.

Well yeah, if you’ve gone to jail on felony charges for lying to people in order to get their money, that sort of thing is going to bring your credibility into question. Just like if someone has a troubled history with the accused’s family that includes sending a widow a picture of her husband’s killer over a business dispute, or just a long history of litigation surrounding business deals gone bad.

The accusations against Jordan remain unconfirmed and haven’t passed the sniff test since they originated last month. And despite the smears that followed on the heels of his speaker run announcement, and despite these latest reports, and despite the highest hopes of those who would politically benefit from Jordan’s downfall, they still don’t. (For more from the author of “Unreliable Sources? New Jim Jordan ‘Scandal’ Story Doesn’t Hold up” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.