Posts

At Least 22 Reportedly Killed in Maine Mass Shootings

At least 22 people have reportedly been killed and many others injured during shootings Wednesday night in Maine.

“Law Enforcement is attempting to locate Robert Card 4/4/1983, as a person of interest regarding the mass shooting at Schemengees Bar and Sparetime Recreation this evening. CARD should be considered armed and dangerous. Please contact law enforcement if you are aware of his whereabouts,” the Lewiston Maine Police Department wrote on Facebook. The post includes a photo of the man.

In a prior post, the department shared the image of a vehicle and asked anyone who recognized it to contact police. “It is believed that the front bumper may be painted black,” the post noted.

A vehicle of interest has been found in Lisbon, Maine, Mike Sauschuck, commissioner of the Maine Department of Public Safety, noted in a news briefing, according to CNN.

NBC News reported that according to a Lewiston police source, at least 22 people were killed. Fifty to 60 individuals were wounded, the outlet reported, citing four law enforcement officials briefed on the issue. (Read more from “At Least 22 Reportedly Killed in Maine Mass Shootings” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Transgender Suspect With Communist Manifesto Arrested for Planning Shootings at Schools, Churches: Police

Law enforcement officials in Colorado have arrested a transgender individual with a communist manifesto for allegedly planning mass shootings at schools and churches in the area.

News of the arrest was made public on Thursday afternoon, but the arrest happened on March 31, just a few days after a transgender terrorist massacred six people, including three children, at a private Christian school in Nashville.

The individual, who The Daily Wire is not naming due to company policy about not giving notoriety to mass killers or those who allegedly aspire to commit such atrocities, is a biological male who goes by a different female name and uses “she/her” pronouns.

The 19-year-old was charged with criminal attempt to commit murder in the first degree (two counts), criminal mischief, menacing, and interference with staff, faculty, or students of educational institutions.

The suspect allegedly targeted Timberview Middle School, Prairie Hills Elementary, Pine Creek High School, and “other targets were churches,” KRDO reported. (Read more from “Transgender Suspect With Communist Manifesto Arrested for Planning Shootings at Schools, Churches: Police” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

POLL: Americans Trust Armed Civilians More Than Police, Feds In Mass Shootings

More Americans trust a good Samaritan armed with a gun to stop a mass shooting than police officers or federal agents, according to a Convention of States Action and Trafalgar Group survey of Americans.

The new survey found that the more Americans believe that their best protection in a mass shooting situation is a nearby armed civilian, rather than police officers or federal agents. Respondents chose armed citizens as the best protection by 41.8% to 25.1% for local police and 10.3% for federal agents. About a fifth people chose none of the above – 22.8%.

Democrats and Republicans differed widely on who each believed best able to protect them during a mass shooting. A plurality of Democrats, 33.9%, picked none of the above. Local police came in second with 31.4%.

Republicans, on the other hand, trusted an armed civilian far more than local police or federal agents. Of the GOP respondents, 70.4% said they trusted an armed civilian most to protect them and their families. Just 1.6% of GOP respondents said that federal agents were in the best spot to protect them.

The pollster surveyed 1,078 likely general election voters from July 7-10, with a margin of error of 2.9%. (Read more from “Poll: Americans Trust Armed Civilians More Than Police, Feds in Mass Shootings” HERE)

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Researchers Claim They Can ‘Catch’ Mass Shooters Before They Carry Out Acts of Violence (VIDEO)

Dr. Jillian Peterson, co-founder of The Violence Project, told “Face The Nation” host John Dickerson that her research suggests that they can “catch people” before they commit mass shootings.

In a clip shared on Twitter, Dickerson asked Peterson, “one of the things you’ve written is that to change the mindset about the way we think about the shooters, that they are us, so how does that help in these moments of crisis? Where for example, would you seek a policy intervention? If you change that mindset, if that’s the first step?”

“Yeah, I think we tend to think of the perpetrators who do this as just these evil monsters kind of lurking out there. And of course, what they do is monstrous. But before they do it, they are our classmates, our nieces or nephews, our neighbors, they’re children going to the school,” Peterson replied, before noting that, “These tend to be insiders, not outsiders.” (Read more from “Researchers Claim They Can ‘Catch’ Mass Shooters Before They Carry Out Acts of Violence” HERE)

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Multiple Dead After Gunman Opens Fire at Factory; Suspect Shot by Cops

A number of people were killed during a “mass shooting” at a factory in Maryland on Thursday, reports said.

There were “multiple fatalities” in the shooting that took place around 2:30 p.m. at Columbia Machine in Smithsburg, according to the Washington County Sheriff’s Office.

The suspect was also shot at the scene by police.

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan told reporters that he had been briefed on the incident and said preliminary reports from state police indicated three people were killed.

“My understanding is that [there was] potentially three people killed,” he said at a press conference on the state’s COVID-19 recovery plan. “The state police responded, pursued the suspect. The suspect fired, shot a state trooper in the shoulder who then returned fire and shot him back. And I don’t know the status of the shooter,but it’s an ongoing, developing situation.” (Read more from “Multiple Dead After Gunman Opens Fire at Factory; Suspect Shot by Cops” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

WATCH: Media Now Dishonestly Classifying Gang Violence as ‘Mass Shootings’

After a bloody weekend of gang violence in Philadelphia and other Democratic cities around the country, leftist media activists are using the carnage as a way to push for new gun control legislation in Washington D.C.

As a way to bolster their narrative, media figures are classifying typical street violence as mass shootings, implying they happened in a targeted fashion at a school or place of worship.

So what exactly is a “mass shooting?” As the University of Pennsylvania and others point out, the definition is arbitrary.

In the United States, there are several different, but common, definitions of mass shootings. The Congressional Research Service defines mass shootings, as multiple, firearm, homicide incidents, involving 4 or more victims at one or more locations close to one another. The FBI definition is essentially the same. Often there is a distinction made between private and public mass shootings (e.g., a school, place of worship, or a business establishment). Mass shootings undertaken by foreign terrorists are not included, no matter how many people die or where the shooting occurs.

[Warning: tweet contains explicit language.]

(Read more from “Media Now Dishonestly Classifying Gang Violence as ‘Mass Shootings'” HERE)

Photo credit: Flickr

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

What the WaPo’s Mass Shooting Numbers Won’t Tell You About Murders in America

The Washington Post’s Sunday edition printed the name of every mass shooting victim since 1966 in the special section. While the number of victims is meant to be staggering, just a little context changes the big picture.

In a section titled “The Lives Lost,” the newspaper listed 1,196 names of shooting victims along with some descriptions of the shootings and photos of the over 400 people killed between the Sandy Hook massacre and the recent mass killing in Dayton Ohio.

“Eleven hundred ninety-six. That’s the number of names on this page,” a tweet from the paper’s Twitter account reads. “People who were doing ordinary things until they were shot to death by killers bent on mass fatalities.”

“This is a moment to reflect on the horrific human toll of mass shootings in our country and to remember the individuals whose lives were cut short,” said Washington Post executive editor Marty Baron.

While not stated, the gun control message here is fairly implicit. One wonders, when presented with 12 pages of printed names of those murdered, how a country can’t just “do something” about horrors like this. That’s how the anti-gun Brady Campaign publicly reacted.

But that number tells only part of a story.

1,196 is considerably lower than 1,692, which is the total number of people shot just in Chicago — where draconian gun control clearly isn’t doing the job it was intended to do — this year as of Monday, according to data compiled by the Chicago Tribune.

According to FBI statistics, there were 1,591 homicides committed with knives or sharp objects in 2017, which is almost 400 more than over 50 years of mass shootings. And that was a decrease from 2016.

The total number of homicides since 1966 is just south of 1 million, according to CR senior editor Daniel Horowitz’s calculation. That means that the 1,196 deaths equal one tenth of a percent of total homicide numbers.

Furthermore, the violent crime rate has dropped in recent decades as the number of guns and concealed carry permits have gone up.

These 1,196 lives should never have been cut short. Their families and communities should never have been torn apart. The taking of innocent life is always atrocious, regardless of the circumstances.

But hard cases make bad law, the legal maxim goes, and even though that statistic by itself may spur some to reiterate calls to disarm their law-abiding fellow citizens, a more comprehensive look at the numbers won’t back them up. (For more from the author of “What the Wapo’s Mass Shooting Numbers Won’t Tell You About Murders in America” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

It’s Not Guns or Mental Illness. the Problem Is Deeper Than That. (VIDEO)

In reaction to the horrific mass shootings in Dayton, Ohio, and El Paso, Texas, this weekend, many people on both sides have been engaged in the same game of slogan-shouting and cliche-spewing that always follows these kinds of things. One side says guns are the problem. The other retorts that mental illness is the real culprit. Both agree that extremist ideologies are partially to blame, but they disagree on which extremist ideology is most to blame. Round and round we go. Nothing is accomplished. Nothing changes. And lost in the fog of talking points is the hard reality of these tragedies — the fact that actual, real people are dying.

It is indeed an epidemic. Mass shootings are still exceedingly rare, but the fact remains that 20 of the 27 deadliest mass shootings in American history have happened in the last 15 years. Since the Virginia Tech massacre in 2007, this country has seen 9 of the 13 deadliest shootings in its history. The worst one ever was two years ago. The second worst was the year before that. It’s true that the media tries to grossly (in multiple senses of the word) inflate mass shooting statistics by counting gang violence in the total, but the numbers are still extraordinary even without being manipulated to prove a political point. For some reason, shootings like El Paso and Dayton are way, way more common today than they were 20 years ago or anytime previous. That is not debatable. The only debatable question is why.

As for that question, we never get close to answering it because we are determined to focus the conversation around guns, mental illness, and extremism. Yes, guns obviously are part of the picture. But our existing laws, if enforced, would have prevented many of these slaughters already. We don’t need more laws. We need, rather, to utilize the ones that are already on the books. The Dayton shooter apparently was caught keeping a hit list of classmates he wanted to kill in high school. I think we can all agree that people with hit lists shouldn’t be able to obtain firearms. But that, again, is a matter for better enforcement, not additional laws. Besides, there have always been guns in this country. There have not always been this many mass shootings. . .

At bottom, the answer is that we have become a country filled with numb, detached, and desensitized people. Mass shootings are the ultimate manifestation of that detachment. Our reaction to them — rhetorically slinging dead bodies at each other to score points in a political argument — is a slightly less severe but very much related manifestation. A survivor of the El Paso shooting reports that the shooter casually smirked before unloading on a crowd of innocent people. This echoes many other reports from many similar shootings. The killer is always smirking like he’s slightly amused, or else he’s blank-faced and emotionless. Rarely do you get a picture of someone running around enraged and screaming. We call these acts of “hate,” but they are much more acts of brutal, murderous indifference. These are empty, numb, detached people slaughtering their fellow humans because they are bored and frustrated with their meaningless lives. (Read more from “It’s Not Guns or Mental Illness. the Problem Is Deeper Than That.” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

No Fame: A Swift Death Penalty Would Deter Some Mass Murderers

What if rather than endless images of innocent people lying dead for the demented dark world on the internet to promote, there were public images of the perpetrator of mass shootings killed swiftly – either on the scene or by capital punishment within a few weeks? The fame that many mass murderers are seeking would be just as swiftly destroyed.

For all the debate over the death penalty in this country, we don’t carry out many executions. There have been 783,453 homicides in this country since the black-robed masters “allowed” us to continue our constitutional heritage of capital punishment for murderers, in 1976. But despite that number, just 1,500 individuals have actually been executed in 43 years. The numbers have declined dramatically in recent years, as only about 20 are executed per year, down from near 100 in the 1990s. Even for the few that are ultimately executed, it takes so many years to carry out that it has almost no deterrent value.

For those clamoring to “do something” about the mass murder events: Why shouldn’t those who are caught perpetrating a mass shooting be publicly executed within a few weeks or months following the attack?

Everyone agrees that lone wolf mass shooters with no prior records are very hard to detect. No honest person can suggest that any of these gun control proposals would have stopped almost any of the recent mass shooters. The best we can do is to deter them by making it clear that either someone concealing a weapon will neutralize them before they achieve the fame they are seeking, or they will be swiftly executed, so that rather than discussing their deed for months, we will be discussing their execution. Why shouldn’t we practice what our Founders did in these circumstances? As Justice Breyer noted in a 1999 case, “Our Constitution was written at a time when delay between sentencing and execution could be measured in days or weeks, not decades.” I’d settle for even a few months.

Yet as of 2017, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the average death row inmate spends 20 years and three months in prison before execution from the time he is sentenced to death. That is up from about six years in 1984 and just days during the time of our Founding. Even the worst mass shooters remain alive for years, and the longer they linger, the more likely the execution will be canceled altogether.

Obviously, the death penalty will not deter all mass shooters, particularly Islamic suicide terrorists or those who take their own lives before being apprehended. But there is a clear pattern among alleged white supremacists and neo-Nazi mass murderers, in particular, showing that, despite their bravado, they are too scared to either take their own lives or fight to the death.

Here is a list of the most recent alleged white supremacists/neo-Nazi shootings:

1999 Los Angeles Jewish Community Center shooting: Buford O. Furrow Jr. wounded five in the lobby of the L.A. Jewish Community Center and later killed a mail carrier. After fleeing the state, he eventually walked right into the Las Vegas FBI office and confessed. He entered a plea bargain to avoid the death penalty in favor of life without parole.

2009 shooting at Holocaust Memorial Museum in D.C.: On June 10, 2009, notorious white supremacist James Wenneker von Brunn opened fire at the D.C. Holocaust museum and killed a police officer. He was captured alive and wounded, but given his poor health and old age, he later died while awaiting trial.

2014 Overland Park Jewish Community Center: Infamous Klansman and Nazi political leader 73-year-old Frazier Glenn Miller Jr. killed three people outside the JCC in Kansas City. He was captured alive by police. He was sentenced to death on November 10, 2015. Nearly four years later, one has to wonder if he will die long before any scheduled execution.

2015 Charleston, S.C., church shooting: On June 17, 2015, Dylann Roof killed nine people in an African-American church during services. He fled the scene and was caught pretty unceremoniously the next day at a traffic stop. On January 17, 2017, Roof was sentenced to death. Several months later, a deal was made in order to avoid a second trial, and he was sentenced to life in prison instead. Now we will pay for his food and medical care for the rest of his life, and he is only in his 20s.

2018 Pittsburgh synagogue shooting: On October 27, 2018, Gregory Bowers walked into Tree of Life Synagogue and killed 11 and injured 7, in what became the worst attack targeting Jews in America. Notably, while Bowers was wounded during the shootout with the local SWAT team, he crawled out of his hiding place to surrender rather than taking his own life.

2019 Poway synagogue shooting: On April 27, 2019, 19-year-old John T. Earnest opened fire at a synagogue in Poway, Calif., killing one and injuring three. Not only did he not fight to the death, but he fled as he was being pursued by a Navy veteran. A short while later, he called in his own 911 report about the shooting, and when the police arrived, he dutifully came out of his car with his hands up.

Then, of course, there is the El Paso shooter from Saturday, who not only declined to fight to the death, but initially came in with hearing protection, despite his claim that he was willing to give up his life. He actually walked over to police in the Walmart parking lot unarmed and surrendered himself. (For more from the author of “No Fame: A Swift Death Penalty Would Deter Some Mass Murderers” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Crime Study: Handguns, Not ‘Assault Rifles,’ Used in Most Mass Shootings

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Media hype about mass shootings in America has fostered a myth that the killings are on the rise and that an assault weapon ban, expanded background checks and greater attention to the mentally ill will curb a rampaging epidemic, according to an authoritative and exhaustive study by a noted criminologist.

Instead, according to James Alan Fox, author and criminology professor at Northeastern University, mass shootings have remained stagnant over 34 years, averaging 20 a year, and few were committed by the type of berserk psychos portrayed by the media.

“Public discourse is grounded in myth and misunderstanding about the nature of the offense and those who perpetrate it,” he writes in the journal “Homicide Studies.” He added: “Without minimizing the pain and suffering of the hundreds of those who have been victimized in recent attacks, the facts clearly say that there has been no increase in mass shootings and certainly no epidemic.”

The study debunks several proposals aired from President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Democrats after the December 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting aimed at stopping mass killings. While he said any plan is worth trying, he concluded that short of abolishing the Second Amendment, there is little that can be done.

“Mass murder just may be a price we pay for living in a society where personal freedom is so highly valued,” he wrote in the study coauthored Northeastern criminology student Monica DeLateur.

Read more from this story HERE.