Posts

Why President Trump Is Right To Consider Pardoning Green Beret Matthew Golsteyn

All too predictably, The New York Times is hyperbolically criticizing President Donald Trump for saying that he would review the case of Maj. Matthew L. Golsteyn, a Green Beret accused of killing an Afghan man in 2010. The New York Times called Trump “impulsive” and accused him of exercising “undue command influence.” But Golsteyn’s case is exactly the situation for which the presidential pardon must be considered. . .

Golsteyn’s involvement in the man’s murder first came to light when he interviewed for a job at the CIA. As part of his application, he was asked to identify any illegal acts or indiscretions in which he may have participated. His confession led to an investigation resulting in withholding Golsteyn’s employment with the CIA, but without charges being brought against him. . .

But then there’s the rule of law, above which none of us can be placed. Golsteyn was given specific orders. He is part of the greatest fighting force in the world, a fighting force whose greatness proceeds from its soldiers’ discipline, adherence to the rule of law, and respect for the chain of command. It is not up to Golsteyn to decide who lives and who dies. No man should have that kind of unfettered authority. He is a soldier, and his job is to follow orders, to carry out his mission faithfully, and to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and, by extension, its laws.

According to the information available, Golsteyn broke the law then made the unforced error of brazenly bringing attention to that fact through a national television broadcast. Unquestionably, there is much more evidence to be uncovered, some of it potentially exculpatory, but if the facts stand as they are, and if there is nothing more of substance to consider, Golsteyn’s choice stood outside of the boundaries of the law, and he must be held to account.

But there are times when the law is too harsh; times when society’s punishment is either illogical or inappropriate for the circumstances. Under these conditions, an escape clause must be configured. Alexander Hamilton said it best, as he so often does, in The Federalist Number 74, “The criminal code of every country partakes so much of necessary severity, that without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel.” (Read more from “Why President Trump Is Right To Consider Pardoning Green Beret Matthew Golsteyn” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

DOJ Indicted Democratic Mega Donor For Defrauding the Military to Win $8 Billion Defense Contract

Three Virginia businessmen were charged with attempting to defraud the United States Military by engaging in illegal commerce in Iran and laundering money internationally in an attempt at winning contracts in Afghanistan.

In 2012, Anham FZCO, a defense contractor based in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which maintained offices in Dubai, UAE, Jordan and the United States, was awarded an $8 billion contract to provide food and supplies to U.S. troops stations in Afghanistan. During the bidding process, Anham said they would build two warehouses to provide supplies. According to the indictment, Anham executives knowingly provided false estimates of the completion dates for the warehouses and by providing the government with misleading photographs intended to convey that Anham’s progress on the warehouses was further along than it actually was. The company allegedly took construction materials and equipment to a site in February 2012 when they created the false appearance of an active construction site. Anham took photos, sent them to the Department of Defense as “in-progress,” and then deconstructed the temporary site.

According to the Department of Justice, bidders were required to certify that they abide by the Iran Sanctions Act, which prohibits U.S. citizens and companies from engaging in commercial activity in Iran. The company allegedly violated the sanctions by shipping warehouse materials to Iran and then, eventually, Afghanistan. They did this as a means of saving money.

“According to the indictment, after learning that the Wall Street Journalwas planning to run a story detailing Anham’s practice of shipping materials through Iran, Abul Huda Farouki sent an email to a senior Department of Defense official, which falsely claimed that senior management at Anham had been unaware that the transshipments through Anham had taken place,” the DOJ said in a release. (Read more from “DOJ Indicted Democratic Mega Donor for Defrauding the Military to Win $8 Billion Defense Contract” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Three U.S. Service Members Killed in Afghanistan

Resolute Support, the NATO-led mission to Afghanistan, announced three U.S. service members were killed by an improvised explosive device on Tuesday.

“Three U.S. service members were killed and three wounded when an improvised explosive device detonated November 27 near Ghazni city. One American contractor was also wounded,” Resolute Support said in a statement. “The wounded service members and contractor were evacuated and are receiving medical care.” . . .

On Sunday, the DOD had identified the soldier that was killed in the Garmsir District, Helmand Province, Afghanistan from “injuries sustained while engaging enemy forces” the day prior as Sgt. Leandro A.S. Jasso.

“The loss of Sgt. Jasso is felt by his family and loved ones, by all who served with him and by all on this mission to protect our country and our allies,” said Gen. Scott Miller, Commanding General of Resolute Support and United States Forces – Afghanistan.

“Sgt. Jasso was killed defending our nation, fighting al Qaeda alongside our Afghan partners,” Miller added. “All of us, and throughout our coalition of 41 nations, recognize the threats posed by groups such as al Qaeda and ISIS and are determined to fight them here.” (Read more from “Three U.S. Service Members Killed in Afghanistan by IED Blast” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

I Was Tear-Gassed, Along With 60 of My Closest Friends, in an Enclosed Space

. . .I was marched, along with the 59 other members of Echo Company, 2/60th Infantry Battalion, into a room. The room — barely big enough for the 60 of us — was dark, the windows were tiny and sealed, and the doors were closed. . .

The Drill Sergeant gave an exaggerated wink as he pulled the pin and waited. As the gas slowly leaked into the room, he delighted in asking us random questions, demanding that we tell him about a favorite family vacation or sing the alphabet backward. The more we talked, he knew, the more we would breathe in the gas.

My eyes began to water. My nose began to run. My throat felt raw. The temptation to rub my eyes was almost unbearable — but we had been warned that would only make it worse, so I restrained myself. . .

They released us from the room into the blistering heat of South Carolina in July, and suddenly things began to look up. My eyes cleared after 5 minutes. My nose and throat were back to normal in 15 minutes. . .

Having been through it myself, I would argue that tear gas is absolutely a reasonable — even somewhat restrained — response to violent attempts to charge the border and to injure Border Patrol agents. (Read more from “I Was Tear-Gassed, Along With 60 of My Closest Friends, in an Enclosed Space” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Army Ranger Killed in Afghanistan

On Sunday, the Department of Defense identified the soldier that was [killed] in the Garmsir District, Helmand Province, Afghanistan from “injuries sustained while engaging enemy forces” the day prior as Sgt. Leandro A.S. Jasso.

Sgt. Jasso, who was on his third deployment, received his injuries while “engaging enemy forces in Khash Rod District, Nimruz Province, Afghanistan,” according to the DOD press release. At the time of his death, he was assigned to 2nd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment, at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington.

“Sgt. Jasso was a humble professional who placed the mission first, lived the Ranger Creed and will be deeply missed,” said Lt. Col. Rob McChrystal, Commander 2d Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment in a statement. (Read more from “Army Ranger Killed in Afghanistan” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Mattis Gave a Pep Talk to Troops Guarding America’s Southern Border, and What He Said Will Give You Goosebumps

Secretary of Defense James Mattis Wednesday visited the troops deployed to the U.S.-Mexico border and gave them some inspiring words ahead of the arrival of a migrant caravan slowly making its way through Mexico toward the U.S.

The Department of Defense’s latest estimate suggests there will be more than 7,000 troops at various positions in Arizona, California and Texas, according to CNBC. Their responsibility will involve erecting barriers and helping the Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) with other logistical tasks. . .

“In the Army, we don’t care if you’re male or female, we don’t care where you go to church or if you go to church,” he said. “We just care when there’s trouble out there, will you keep the faith, will you ride for the brand, and when trouble looms, do you go toward the trouble to help your buddies.”

“Loyalty only matters when there’s a hundred reasons not to be loyal,” Mattis told the troops. “When it’s raining and you’re cold. It’s when you’re in a position where people are showing a lack of respect for each other elsewhere and you and your team are holding strong.” . . .

The defense secretary announced after visiting with military personnel that he does not expect law enforcement to come in direct contact with any of the migrants, a fear that arose after President Donald Trump announced the military will treat rocks thrown by migrants at troops as firearms. (Read more from “Mattis Gave a Pep Talk to Troops Guarding America’s Southern Border, and What He Said Will Give You Goosebumps” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

There Is No Better Use for Our Military Than Guarding Our Own Border

This is akin to a “Gaza moment” for our border. Thankfully, with Operation Faithful Patriot and the deployment of 5,200 troops, the president appears to be taking it as seriously as the Israelis take their border.

Evidently, our political class believes that the U.S. military was created solely for urban renewal and social work projects in Kabul, Baghdad, Raqqa, and Mogadishu, but not for the purpose of protecting our border. In fact, that is almost the only role of our military that our Founders envisioned. It is the one military deployment that the president can order unilaterally without a congressional declaration of war, because it is purely defensive. The president is right to deploy soldiers, because the time has come to treat our own border with as much respect and care as we would other countries’ borders.

Yesterday, President Trump announced before the world that we are indeed a sovereign nation and will finally treat our border – the national private property of all the citizenry – with the respect it deserves. There are already several thousand troops down at the border, and he intends to increase the numbers. It’s about time. We don’t want to spend $700 billion per year on the military so that it can referee Islamic tribal wars or nation-build overseas. Our first priority needs to be our own border.

What about the Border Patrol, you might ask?

How open-border policies creating caravans endanger our national security

Here’s the reality. If one believes we need to deploy our military around the world, then our need for them on our border is that much greater. Some 72,000 people died here last year from drugs, most of them due to heroin, cocaine, and meth laced with fentanyl brought in by the drug cartels. How is it brought in? Through military-style operations of the cartels, which strategically throw the bogus asylum seekers into the arms of the border agents and then send in the drugs, gangs, and special interest aliens through the gaps created by the diversion.

Brandon Judd, president of the Border Patrol Council, active-duty agent, and former instructor at the Border Patrol Academy, explained it to me as follows:

In the past, criminal cartels have exploited the caravans by forcing individuals in the caravans to cross the border illegally, thereby forcing the Border Patrol to use resources to take the individuals into custody. This depletes our resources because it takes agents out of the field for processing. Taking agents out of the field creates artificial gaps in our coverage and allows cartels to smuggle [in] their higher-value contraband, such as opioids and criminal aliens or persons from special-interest countries, through the gaps.

The damage to America’s safety and security is incalculable, and it is that gap that needs to be closed. There are likely hundreds of thousands of these dangerous individuals who come over every year undetected, thanks to the bogus asylum claims that occupy the Border Patrol. The Arizona Sherriff’s Association warned in a letter last month that Border Patrol “is currently using up to 40% of their available staff to monitor family units.”

This is where the military comes in. “The military will be able to monitor the gaps and will be able to alert us to any crossings, thereby cutting into the cartels’ profits,” said Judd, who is thankful for the deployment of the military. “If we’re able to cut into profits, the cartels themselves will stop these caravans from coming because it puts too much pressure and attention on their illegal enterprise.”

Judd’s point is that the cartels operate like any other logical economy, though with the brute tactics and firepower of a foreign army. They have to show results to their clients. A 50 percent chance of being apprehended is not good enough for those who are criminals and will likely be thrown in prison if caught by Border Patrol. They have to guarantee them success in crossing, which is why the caravans and fake asylum seekers are so dangerous. Guess which ones will likely be smuggled through privately while the women and children are sent to the border agents under the watchful eye of the officious media?

What was very telling about Trump’s announcement is that he didn’t just speak of the caravan. He talked about the hundreds of thousands we fail to catch every year. There’s the equivalent of a caravan coming over every day. Despite the pictures from the media focusing on women, three quarters of those coming are males, and in some sectors, such as Laredo, it’s as high as 88 percent. Many of them have become violent and have injured Mexican police with rocks and bottles. Trump was right to sternly warn them that the military will treat this like an invasion. Rocks can kill and have killed border agents in the past.

Our own military can guard our own border
Finally, the public needs to understand that the cartels, such as Sinaloa and Zetas, are every bit as violent as ISIS and Hezbollah. They are right on our border and are responsible for the death of tens of thousands of Americans as well as endless violence on our side of the border. There should not be one inch of American soil that is not safe, and we should never deploy a single soldier overseas until our own territory is secure. This is not just for Americans, but for Mexicans as well. Nearly 30,000 Mexicans were murdered last year because of the cartel turf wars created by the lax immigration policies implemented by the Obama administration. Why is it that the media is obsessed with every murder in the Middle East, yet couldn’t care less about thousands dying a stone’s throw away from El Paso? I’m not a big fan of nation-building, but if we actually want to “stabilize” nations through military intervention, Mexico is the most important country to stabilize. And that begins by first securing our own side of the border. That will be a warning shot to the cartels that we mean business.

I’m already seeing ignorant pundits suggest that somehow the deployment of our military on our own border violates the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act. The law was signed by President Grant to prohibit the military from being used to enforce domestic Reconstruction-era laws against American citizens in the southern states, absent direct authorization from Congress. To repel an invasion at our border — any invasion — is actually the quintessential use of our military that our Founders had in mind. Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution tasks the federal government with guaranteeing states’ protection against invasion, and we owe it to Arizona and Texas to secure their territory. And unlike “offensive expeditions” that George Washington felt required congressional authorization for deploying troops, the use of the military to fight the drug cartels and smuggling is part of “the power to repel sudden attacks” that James Madison and Elbridge Gerry promised at the constitutional convention would be left to the executive.

Trump has shown strong leadership as commander in chief on this issue. But there is one issue that even the military cannot solve: our own legal masochism. The caravan is now suing us in our own federal courts. If the Trump administration even legitimizes this lawsuit by sending DOJ attorneys to defend the case rather than simply treating this potential judge as a lawbreaker of all judicial precedent, no army in the world can stop the invasion by lawfare. (For more from the author of “There Is No Better Use for Our Military Than Guarding Our Own Border” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Rosie O’Donnell: Send Military to the White House to ‘Get’ Trump

Rosie O’Donnell said on MSNBC Thursday that she wants to send the U.S. military to the White House to “get” President Donald Trump.

O’Donnell made the comments while appearing in a wild segment of Nicolle Wallace’s MSNBC show called “Deadline: White House.” O’Donnell was describing how she was depressed for a year after Trump was elected when she proposed a coup of the presidency.

“What I wrote on Twitter was we should impose martial law until we make sure the Russians weren’t involved in the final tally of the votes. … And people were like, ‘Martial law? What’s wrong with you?’” Rosie opined.

“He wants to send the military to the border,” MSNBC host Wallace quipped about Trump weighing the option of sending the military to the border to deal with the Honduran caravan of illegal aliens traveling toward the border. . .

Rosie, who has professionally feuded with Trump for years, did call for martial law to be imposed soon after Trump’s victory in 2016.

(Read more from “Rosie O’Donnell: Send Military to the White House to ‘Get’ Trump” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Army Misses Recruiting Goal for First Time in Over a Decade

The Army missed its recruiting goal this year for the first time in well over a decade, which officials blamed on increased competition in a strong private-sector economy and the fact that “nobody wants to talk” to recruiters on the phone or face to face these days.

For the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, Army leaders said they pulled in about 70,000 new recruits. The goal was 76,500.

It’s the first time the Army fell short of its target since 2005, and all of the other branches of the military hit their benchmarks this year.

“We obviously thought we would do better than that,” Maj. Gen. Joe Calloway, director of military personnel management for the Army, told the Associated Press, adding that in recent years the Army had pulled in at least 3,000 more recruits than expected.

“We obviously thought we would do better than that,” Maj. Gen. Joe Calloway, director of military personnel management for the Army, told the Associated Press, adding that in recent years the Army had pulled in at least 3,000 more recruits than expected. (Read more from “Army Misses Recruiting Goal for First Time in Over a Decade” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Recruitment Problem the Military Doesn’t Want to Talk About

. . .In April, Trump followed up on his pledge by signing a defense bill that not only ended the spending caps, but called for an increase in the military’s size in 2018 by adding 20,000 new personnel—including 7,500 more soldiers, 4,000 more sailors, 1,000 new Marines, and 4,100 more airmen.

Senior military officers, and particularly Army Chief of Staff Mark Milley, celebrated the increase. Since becoming his service’s senior officer, Milley has argued that to meet its obligations, the Army will need 540,000 soldiers in its ranks by 2022, an increase of some 70,000 soldiers over four years. “It is not some arbitrary number,” Milley told a gathering of Army veterans back in August. “We have done the analysis. We need to be bigger, and we need to be stronger and more capable.”

Milley’s goal meant that the Army not only needed to find 17,500 new soldiers every year, it needed to find replacements for those who retire or leave the service every year—about 20 percent of the force. So it is that the Army set its 2018 recruiting goal at 80,000 soldiers. Initially, at least, Milley’s target seemed modest, reachable. It wasn’t.

In April, the Army revised that number—downwards. Instead of recruiting 80,000, it announced that it would recruit 76,500 new soldiers. But even that number might be too high, as the Army notes that it’s recruited only 28,000 in the first six months of the year. The problem, it seems, isn’t that young people don’t want to join the Army—or any of the services—it’s that they can’t. And therein lies a paradox: for while the U.S. military represents the best in America (as its most senior officers claim), it doesn’t actually represent America. For that to be true, two thirds of our military would have to consist of obese, under-educated former drug users and convicted criminals.

Here’s the arithmetic: one in three potential recruits are disqualified from service because they’re overweight, one in four cannot meet minimal educational standards (a high school diploma or GED equivalent), and one in 10 have a criminal history. In plain terms, about 71 percent of 18-to-24-year-olds (the military’s target pool of potential recruits) are disqualified from the minute they enter a recruiting station: that’s 24 million out of 34 million Americans. The good news is that while the military takes pride in attracting those who are fit, educated, law abiding, and drug-free, they’re having difficulty finding them—manifestly because fewer of them actually exist. (Read more from “The Recruitment Problem the Military Doesn’t Want to Talk About” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.