Posts

Biden Fires Sean Spicer From Naval Academy Board

You’re fired!

That’s what a note from the White House to former Trump spokesman Sean Spicer said in demanding that he resign from the U.S. Naval Academy Board of Visitors.

“On behalf of President Biden, I am writing to request your resignation as a member of the Board of Visitors to the U.S. Naval Academy. Please submit your resignation to me by the close of business today,” read the letter sent Wednesday by the White House personnel office.

“Should we not receive your resignation, your position with the board will be terminated effective 6 p.m. tonight. Thank you,” it added.

(Read more from “Biden Fires Sean Spicer From Naval Academy Board” HERE)

Delete Facebook, Delete Twitter, Follow Restoring Liberty and Joe Miller at gab HERE.

Spicer Outlasts Stephanopoulos in White House Press Room

Critics said he was out of his element in conducting White House press briefings, but he steadily continued for nearly five months into the new presidential administration, frequently having a rocky ride and clashes with the press. Finally, the president ordered a shakeup, and moved him to another job.

This was the Clinton administration in 1993, and the briefer was White House communications director George Stephanopoulos, who had shared time sparring with reporters with press secretary Dee Dee Myers.

As of Wednesday afternoon, 24 years later, President Donald Trump’s White House press secretary, Sean Spicer, will have outlasted Stephanopoulos at the lectern in the briefing room.

When Spicer showed up 30 minutes late for Tuesday’s briefing, though, reporters had reason to wonder whether he would be the one taking questions.

For months, there’s been plenty of speculation that Trump might move Spicer, known for dramatic tangles with reporters, to another job. This notion gained more steam after White House communications director Mike Dubke resigned in late May, leaving the position open.

Deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders fueled some of that speculation Monday, giving a less than direct answer on their futures after a reporter asked, “Where is Sean?”

After some give and take, in which Sanders noted, “He’s here today,” the same reporter asked: “Has his position changed, then?”

Sanders answered: “It’s probably upgraded at this point, given that we don’t have a communications director.”

The reporter, April Ryan of American Urban Radio Network, followed up: “So you will be the new press secretary here?”

Sanders replied:

I did not say that at all. I’m just filling in for the day, April. There are a lot of demands on his schedule, particularly given the fact that there’s not a communications director, and this is part of my job as well. And when I’m needed, I’ll step in.

If Spicer is elevated to communications director, he actually would be taking on a larger role compared with Stephanopoulos, who became a political adviser in Bill Clinton’s White House and reportedly moved to a smaller office. At the time, Stephanopoulos was 32. Today, Spicer is 45.

But, if Trump makes Spicer both communications director and press secretary, the former Republican National Committee communications official could hit the same problems Stephanopoulos had in 1993, said George Condon, now a White House reporter for National Journal.

Condon, then a reporter for Copley News Service, was president of the White House Correspondents’ Association during the shakeup in the early months of the Clinton administration.

“He made the mistake that they all make at first of not realizing how much work it is to brief. You can’t do both jobs and he was determined to do both jobs,” Condon told The Daily Signal, recalling what happened with Stephanopoulos:

A communications director is supposed to be big picture, making sure the government is speaking with the same voice, the agencies, the overall communications strategy, that’s a lot of work. Just preparing for the briefing takes several hours every day. Stephanopoulos got clobbered in his first briefing. He just got clobbered.

“He liked the attention of briefing,” Condon said of Stephanopoulos. “He liked the spotlight. But he wasn’t very good at it because you can’t do both jobs.”

The communications director position began with the Nixon administration in the 1970s, Condon noted.

“The only administration that tried to combine the duties is Clinton, and it was a miserable failure. And if they try to do that here, it will be again,” Condon said. “You can’t have two voices in the administration. That’s problematic. If you want Sarah to do it, pick Sarah as press secretary.”

For a time, Clinton in effect had two functioning press secretaries, Condon suggested, and that didn’t work—even without today’s Twitter factor.

Stephanopoulos’ final press briefing was June 4, 1993, according to the American Presidency Project at the University of California Santa Barbara.

He would continue to work for Clinton before taking a job as a commentator on ABC News in 1997, after Clinton’s re-election, and then becoming an anchor for the network’s Sunday morning program, “This Week.”

Today, Stephanopoulos, 56, is ABC’s chief news anchor and chief political correspondent and co-anchor of “Good Morning America” as well as host of “This Week.”

Clinton, a Democrat, hired senior adviser David Gergen, who had worked for Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, both Republicans.

On June 7, Gergen announced a shuffle in which Mark D. Gearan replaced Stephanopoulos as communications director.

Stephanopoulos also became a senior adviser to the president. Myers remained press secretary, but with an expanded role so she was in charge of briefings.

The New York Times, in a story by Gwen Ifill, reported at the time:

[Gergen] ordered the reopening of the door linking the White House briefing room with the offices occupied by Administration communications officials. The closing of the door in January had sent relations between the reporters and Mr. Clinton off to a bad start …

Two weeks ago, the briefing room had been a hostile place, full of questions and strained answers about Presidential haircuts, travel office dismissals and razor-thin victories in the House. That changed for at least an hour today as Mr. Gergen took a break from moving into his office to begin a new effort at outreach.

“When they brought in Gergen and he shoved Stephanopoulos off the briefing, Dee Dee [Myers] really came into her own after that. But before that, Jan. 20 through May 30, were terrible,” Condon said.

Putting the timeline aside, Spicer’s early months might be more comparable to the tenure of Myers or to that of President George W. Bush’s second press secretary, Scott McClellen, said John Gizzi, a veteran Washington correspondent now covering the White House for Newsmax.

One reason Stephanopoulos was doing so many briefings concurrently with Myers is because of her “poor performance,” Gizzi said.

Eventually, the Clinton White House made another change by naming Mike McCurry as press secretary in January 1995, two years after Clinton assumed the presidency.

“Mike McCurry came in and he was considered the gold standard until Tony Snow came along [under George W. Bush],” Gizzi said, adding:

McClellen was a very good person. He was not always brought into the confidence of the president or Karl Rove, and he said so in his book, which cost him their friendship. He was a good man and an honest person and well intentioned. But when you don’t tell someone things and they go out and they are contradicted by events, it hurts.

Press secretaries do have a tendency to grow on the job, Gizzi said.

“Josh Earnest, because he was the No. 2 [as deputy press secretary], was ready for the top job when he came in,” Gizzi said of President Barack Obama’s third and final press secretary. “But if it weren’t for him filling in on those briefings the way he did, I don’t think he would have been effective. Dana Perino filled in for Tony Snow when he was ill, and then when he finally retired. She was ready for the [press secretary] job. So, it doesn’t hurt to play in the minor leagues before you go pro.” (For more from the author of “Spicer Outlasts Stephanopoulos in White House Press Room” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Why Is Spicer STILL Calling Trump’s EO a ‘Travel Ban’?

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer is under fire for his use of the phrase “travel ban” and his claims that this is what the White House team has been calling Trump’s two executive orders on travel back in February. Calling it this is bad rhetorical move by the president’s messaging shop.

During an exchange at the daily press briefing at the White House, Spicer claimed that the administration has been “pretty consistent” in referring to the measure, which is demonstrably false.

In addition to the bad news cycle that comes with misrepresenting one’s own previous remarks, trying to turn around and sell the policy now as a “travel ban” is just bad branding.

First off, it’s not a “Muslim Ban” (for the umpteenth time).

In reality, the executive order is a prudential halt on immigration from a list of countries that was put together by the Obama administration; includes no explicit religious test whatsoever; grandfathers in people with green cards (even though it doesn’t really have to); does not include any religious test whatsoever (which the 9th Circuit got around by cobbling together the president’s campaign rhetoric into an opinion); and does not apply to countries like Indonesia and India, which hold a quarter of the world’s Muslim population.

Secondly, it’s not a “ban” in the permanent sense of that word and those (until now) wielding it to imply.

At best, the executive orders heralded a temporary moratorium, or a cool-off, if that’s too much of a mouthful. Rather, the branding of a “travel ban” just sounds like a sterilized acceptance of its opponents’ premises that it’s a really a Muslim ban.

Furthermore, this seeming acceptance – in message, at least – gives fuel to the opponents’ arguments that the E.O. is really just a Muslim ban in disguise. And it does all this for a pre-determined amount of time with the aim of replacing the suspension with an updated vetting system for the sake of national security.

Yes, the attack on Trump’s order as a “Muslim ban” is intellectually dishonest, but trying to baptize that language into calling it a travel ban and pushing that phrase as the preferred terminology is just bad branding. (For more from the author of “Why Is Spicer STILL Calling Trump’s EO a ‘Travel Ban’?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.