Thanksgiving TRUTH About ‘Native Americans’

Happens every Thanksgiving, doesn’t? Some bleeding heart liberal you’re “related to” gets on their moral high Crazy Horse and lectures about how horribly rotten the white man was to the Native Americans. Which is why this year we’re throwing in the tomahawk. Time to scalp the facts about the Indians. Feathers not dots.

It’s Thanksgiving! You know what that means. As you try and enjoy your downtime with your family, you’ll undoubtedly find a social justice warrior around your Thanksgiving table trying to force-feed you white guilt. Afterall, your ancestors commited genocide against the Indians. Sorry native Americans. Indigenous? Let’s just go with redskins.

Only one problem, most of it pure, unadulterated buffalo-feces.

Alright to preface this, yes, some of the settlers committed some heinous crimes that were inexcusable, and I’ve benefited from the privelege thereof, yada yada yada… but sooooome of the propoganda out there needs to be called out. Civilizations clash, that’s happened since the beginning of time. War sucks, but that doesn’t give teachers, leftists and social justice warriors the right to LIE about non-existent peaceful Native Americans who rode horses, never experienced war, painted with colors of the wind and were taken out by smallbox blankets. So before you dumbasses hang that dreamcatcher from your rearview mirror, hold your mouth because this tin can I’m about to kick just might hit you in the teeth. Let’s debunk some common PC thanksgiving myths.

MYTH: THE NATIVE AMERICANS WERE A PEACEFUL CULTURE TO WHOM THE CONCEPT OF WAR WAS FOREIGN

FACT: MANY WERE BRUTAL, CONQUERING ***HOLES

Native Americans warred with each other since, forever. Sometimes it was over hunting or farming grounds, sometimes revenge, sometimes to steal, sometimes to kill. I don’t say this to demonize them, they were no different than any other regressive, Neolithic cultures on other continents.

But the truth is that the only way settlers were able to conquer this land was through the help of Native Americans who teamed up with them to settle the score with the other, more assholish tribes. You think Cortes was able to conquer with only 500 Conquisadors. Course not, it took 50,000 ANGRY allied Native Americans who’d had it up to here with being enslaved and forced to carry gold for the other, Native Aztecs.

Some of of the Indian tribes were the most brutal in existence.

They practiced enslavement, rape, cannibalism, would sometimes target women and children, tribes like the Commanchees would butcher babies and roast people alive… and by the way, where do you think we LEARNED scalping?

MYTH: NATIVE AMERICANS WERE AN ADVANCED SOCIETY

TRUTH: NOT EVEN CLOSE

Smell that? It’s your sacred cow being torched. After I scalped her, of course. Unlike Rome, Greece, China, or pretty much any great empire which had already existed at that time, the Native Americans didn’t have advanced plumbing, transportation, mathematics or really… anything that led to the iphone on which you’re currently watching this. That whole beautiful “horseback Indian” culture you read about? It’s a lie because they hadn’t even domesticated horses. Not only that, but they didn’t even use the WHEEL. No really. 1400 AD… no wheel.

Even more reason that, when you’re that far behind, the clash of civilizations is going to be THAT much more drastic when the new wheel-using world catches up to you.

MYTH: THE SETTLERS DELIBERATELY INFECTED NATIVES WITH SMALLPOX BLANKETS TO WHIPE THEM OUT

TRUTH: ONLY IDIOTS COULD POSSIBLY BELIEVE THIS

Think about it. You really believe Europeans waged microbial, biological warfare… long before discovery, mass acceptance or even close to an understanding of advanced germ theory?

So it’s not true. You can look forever for historical accounts of mass smallpox blankets being pajamagrammed to the peaceful Indians, but you won’t find them. But there is SOME truth to the myth, which brings us to our final point.

MYTH: EUROPEANS COMMITTED MASS GENOCIDE. KILLING EVERY NATIVE AMERICAN FOR SPORT

TRUTH: NOT EVEN CLOSE

However, it is estimated that at high as 95% of pre-Columbian Native Americans were in fact killed off by disease, WHY? Because Europeans introduced new diseases to which the Native Americans hadn’t developed an immunity not only with THEMSELVES but now contact with animals like again HORSES which Native Americans hadn’t domesticated. Again, because they were such an archaic, unadvanced society.

Sure there were plenty of bloody, horrendous, unimaginable battles that occurred, and generally when it comes to neoloithic tribes and more advances settlers, the guys with the boom-boom sticks win. This isn’t exclusive to America or all that uncommon.

But Europeans were not hellbent on wiping out Native Americans, they were actually encouraged to bring the people into European culture and convert them to Christianity. Plus, inter-marrying was incredibly common. How else do you explain Johnny Depp, Angalina Jolie, Kid Cudi and even imaginary Elizabeth Warren claiming to be 1/16th Cherokee?

Killing people is bad. But so is milking, misleading and guilting all future generations for crimes they didn’t commit. Yep, Europeans conquered the Native Americans, created a Constitutional Republic, and advanced in mere centuries what Natives couldn’t do for thousands of years here on the plot of land that is America. So close this smartphone window, go enjoy your turkey and tell your social justice warrior cousin at the table to shut that mustached, single-origin-coffee drinking-hole. Or just… hand him a smallpox napkin.

SOURCES

Indigineous Americans didn’t invent the wheel: https://www.quora.com/Why-were-the-indigenous-peoples-of-the-Americas-not-able-to-invent-the-wheel

Native Americans were introduced to horses by Spaniards: https://www.omgfacts.com/lists/8801/Native-Americans-didn-t-originally-use-or-know-about-horses-They-were-introduced-to-them-by-the-Spaniards

Colonists learned to scalp from Indians (not sure about the source, but…): https://www.native-languages.org/iaq12.htm

Smallpox blanket hoax: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/plag/5240451.0001.009/–did-the-us-army-distribute-smallpox-blankets-to-indians?rgn=main;view=fulltext

Genocide myth: https://american3rdposition.com/?p=12675

Time table of Native American wars: https://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1008.html

Easy to read reference guide of conflicts from 1540 on: https://www.legendsofamerica.com/na-indianwartimeline.html

Details of Colonial Indian wars: https://www.legendsofamerica.com/na-colonialindianwars.html

Clashes with European settlers: https://www.wvculture.org/history/indland.html

Comanches butchered babies, ate enemies: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396760/How-Comanche-Indians-butchered-babies-roasted-enemies-alive.html

Capitalism over cannibalism: https://www.theblaze.com/blog/2013/05/01/history-rant-cannibalism-at-jamestown-why/

Reject the lie of white “genocide” against Native Americans: https://townhall.com/columnists/michaelmedved/2007/09/19/reject_the_lie_of_white_genocide_against_native_americans/page/full

Native Americans “National Day of Mourning”: https://www.uaine.org/

Obama’s Thanksgiving messages regularly fail to actually thank God: https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/11/22/for-fourth-straight-year-obama-thanksgiving-message-god/

8 little known Thanksgiving facts: https://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/11/22/8-little-known-facts-about-thanksgiving/

Top 5 Thanksgiving proclamations: https://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/11/25/top-five-thanksgiving-proclamations/

(For more from the author of “Thanksgiving TRUTH About ‘Native Americans'” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Stephen Colbert Sides With Bullies and Mocks the Weak, Syrian Christians Deserve Better

Stephen Colbert is occasionally funny. Sometimes he stands up for the truth, as when he demolished professional ex-Catholic gasbag Garry Wills. Sometimes Colbert is simply clueless, as when the Catholic Sunday school teacher welcomed a Satanist band on his show. But last week Colbert disgraced himself by comparing millions of persecuted Middle Eastern Christians, refugees from the death-squads and rape gangs of ISIS, to the bigots and killers of the Ku Klux Klan. Until and unless he apologizes, Colbert should be boycotted by every person of good will.

Colbert was attacking political leaders such as Ted Cruz, who argue that Middle Eastern Christians deserve our special welcome as refugees, since they are the primary target of religious persecution in the world. More than a million Christians were driven out of Iraq on our watch, while our brave troops followed their orders to guard embassies and oil ministries. These Christians have no nearby refuge. No Christians in the region (not even in Lebanon) are safe from Islamic terror. In some Sunni Muslim countries, such as Iraq and Syria, organized killing squads blow up churches during Sunday services and capture Christian women to sell as sex slaves. In Sunni Muslim Turkey the state represses Christian speech and encourages Islamists, while in the Sunni Muslim “Vatican,” Saudi Arabia, Bibles are banned, and oppressed foreign workers cannot even worship in embassies.

In these large and prosperous countries, Sunni Islam isn’t persecuted; it’s mandatory. The Sunni Muslims displaced by Syria’s civil war — where Sunnis are fighting for power over the Alawites, Shiites, and Christians — could resettle safely in any of these lands. The Christians can’t. But the post-Christian countries in most of Europe are ignoring the plight of the Christians, while welcoming Sunni Muslims, who throng to join the same mosques that teach the same intolerant Sunni Islam that fuels the persecution of Christians, and every year generates hundreds of terrorist attacks, like the slaughter in Paris, and the next atrocity that police are scrambling to prevent even now in Belgium.

Ted Cruz speaks for millions of Americans who want to bring in the persecuted Christians instead of those who share the faith of their persecutors, Sunni Muslims whose own religious texts tell them to “kill the infidel.” You won’t read news reports of Assyrian or Chaldean Christians persecuting anyone. They have been disarmed, harmless minority groups under the rule of foreign regimes for the past 2,000 years. The number of Assyrian and Chaldean Christian terrorist incidents has been zero, every year. That means that unlike Sunni Muslims, they are no security threat to America. We could “welcome the stranger,” the truly needy and desperate victim of persecution, instead of those who pray alongside their persecutors.

For a fuller view of the case for resettling emigrants in the closest safe country to their homelands, see Iraqi exile Luma Simms’s luminous essay at The Federalist. Thanks to the presence in so many European cities of Muslim extremists, who view Middle Eastern Christians with special hatred, the first safe country for many of these real refugees might be the United States.

In the face of such perfectly logical, truly compassionate arguments, Colbert was clearly flummoxed. He wanted to chime in along with his fellow media one-percenters by mocking the “rubes” and “rednecks” who fear Islamic terrorism (Imagine that!) — who feel a connection to persecuted Christians that they don’t to intolerant Sunnis. But where could he reach for material? He couldn’t find Chaldean killing squads, or Assyrian suicide bombers. They don’t exist. So Colbert dug up a decades-old photo of Klansmen, who flouted their own Christian faith by persecuting their black fellow-Christians. You see, he said, Here are Christian terrorists! The unheated metal storage containers where Middle Eastern Christians are huddling for shelter from intolerant Sunni Muslims don’t have televisions, so the hunted Christian refugees didn’t get to see Colbert smirking as he compared them and their families to the Klan. Perhaps that’s a minor mercy.

When a Comedian Uses His Bully Pulpit for Bullying

When comedians succeed, they are told backstage, “You killed them.” People used to say “You slay me,” in a nod to the aggression built in to comedy’s DNA. We are rendered “helpless” with laughter, “reduced to tears,” sometimes even “convulsed.” By contrast, most jokes told from the pulpit fall completely flat because they aren’t edgy enough. The teller stirs up a tepid, impatient chuckle, because he fears to offend.

Aggression is morally neutral. A gun can be used to defend the helpless, provide the hungry with food, or slaughter the innocent. Saying that you are “against” either guns or aggression is like taking a stand against gravity or entropy. That sentiment belongs in a song which stoners sing each other in dorm rooms, but in a fallen world, nowhere else.

Comedy is a blade that cuts in all sorts of ways. At its noblest, comedy slices away the lies we tell ourselves, and the cover stories of bullies. Grim humor helped the people of the Eastern Bloc endure the daily absurdities of life under Communism. A good joke can tell a vital truth in a few words with lasting power. Here is a classic anti-Nazi quip (via Hannah Arendt) that Jews repeated in concentration camps:

An anti-Semite claimed that the Jews had caused the war;

The reply was: “Yes, the Jews and the bicyclists.”

“Why the bicyclists?” asks the one.

“Why the Jews?” asks the other.

But humor can also serve evil, when it’s employed against the weak. Our culture still remembers how minstrel shows reinforced the logic of segregation. That’s why people are rightly condemned for dressing up in blackface. Spike Lee’s great satire Bamboozled reminds us how damnably funny the humor of cruelty can be. We both grew up hearing Anne Frank and Helen Keller jokes — and no, we won’t repeat them here.

In a culture still fitfully haunted by the ghost of Christian sentiments, when someone points out that we are picking on the helpless, we might feel guilty. If others notice, we might be ashamed. If everyone notices, we will be shunned — which isn’t good for your career. That’s why we don’t hear racist jokes from (white) comedians anymore, thank heavens.

So if you are a comedian who for political reasons wants to suck up to the strong and pick on the weak, without earning opprobrium, what are your options? The best one is the old switcheroo — make the strong (on whom you are fawning) seem weak, and the weak (for whom you are gunning) seem strong. Then you can kiss up while kicking down and be applauded for your courage. Win-win!

Sunni Muslims in the Middle East are strong. Saudi Arabia spends hundreds of millions of dollars funding intolerant Sunni mosques in every corner of the world, while forbidding a single Christian chapel on its soil. Saudi cash sloshes into academic departments at schools such as Georgetown University, to ensure that their Middle Eastern studies programs are Islamically correct. Well-funded Islamic pressure groups, such as the terrorist-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) target any public figure who speaks truthfully about Islam. Academic and media elites regard concern over Muslim intolerance as contemptible, dismissing it as “Islamophobia,” a prejudice akin to the (career-ending) charge of racism. And criticizing Islam can also be deadly — as the cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo found out, and the makers of South Park chose not to, fearfully canceling their episode that skewered Muhammad. A dozen Americans were nearly killed in Garland, Texas, at the “Draw Muhammad” attack. It takes no courage at all for a New York-based TV comedian to make nice to Islam, and Muslims.

Nor does it cost Stephen Colbert a thing to sneer at the most abandoned people on earth, Middle Eastern Christians — to compare these dark-skinned refugees living in tents, who rely on underfunded foreign charities for cooking oil and space heaters, to the ex-slaveowning aristocrats who led the Ku Klux Klan. Such quips might win Colbert an invitation to write for The New Yorker, might help him to snag a TED talk. But they’re not jokes he will want to hear repeated back on Judgment Day, when “killer” humor might take on a different meaning entirely. (For more from the author of “Stephen Colbert Sides With Bullies and Mocks the Weak, Syrian Christians Deserve Better” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Mocks Reporter’s Disability

The New York Times is angry that Donald Trump mocked one of its reporters who has a physical disability.

Trump waved his arms in an awkward manner to lampoon Serge Kovaleski at a rally in South Carolina Tuesday night. Kovaleski has a chronic condition called arthrogryposis, which limits the movement of his arms.

The New York Times was offended. “We find it’s outrageous that he would ridicule the appearance of one of our reporters,” a spokesperson told CNNMoney.

Trump’s performance was prompted by a story Kovaleski had written in 2001 that refuted claims that thousands of Muslims in Jersey City cheered the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center.

Trump is insisting that he saw “thousands” of Muslims celebrating in Jersey City, N.J., as the twin towers burned fell on the other side of the Hudson River. (Read more from “Trump Mocks Reporter’s Disability” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

U.S. Admits 680K Immigrants From Muslim Countries Over 5 Years

As we ominously watch European cities like Brussels and Paris beleaguered by a growing population of homegrown radical Islamists, we must ask what our government is doing to prevent the United States from following the same trajectory. As noted a number of times, our immigration from countries infected with radical Islam has doubled in recent years, totaling over 1.6 million from 2001-2013.

According to a new analysis from the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, chaired by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), this trajectory has grown sharply just over the five most recent years. Counting all of the green cards issued to foreign nationals of predominantly Muslim countries between FY 2009 and FY 2013 alone, the subcommittee found that 680,000 individuals have been granted legal permanent residence in America. That is a larger number than the population of our nation’s capital.

This coincides with census data analyzed by the Center for Immigration Studies, which estimates a 415,784 net increase in the population of nationals from predominantly Muslim countries living in the U.S from 2010-2014. If net population growth, which is mitigated by deaths and emigration grew by that much, it makes sense that the initial migration numbers have been much higher. One could only imagine what the numbers would be had Marco Rubio gotten his way and successfully passed the Gang of 8 immigration bill.

In recent years, most estimates pegged annual Muslim immigration at roughly 100,000 per year, but this analysis suggests that the trend is growing to more than 10% of our annual intake. Remember, there is only an estimated 630,000 Muslims in the entire country of Belgium, and yet, they are in lockdown and have rampant problems of homegrown terror. We have admitted more Muslims to the U.S. in five years alone. And all indications point to the fact that the trend is growing every year because immigration from Muslim countries is the fastest growing of all parts of the world.

While the overall size of our country is obviously much larger than European countries, making the overall assimilation problems less impactful, the numbers still matter when calculating the percentage of those likely to become radicalized and the number of potential terrorists we are cultivating here at home.

Shouldn’t we focus first on assimilating those already here and counteracting the growing homegrown radicalization before we expand upon the already record-high baseline of immigration from countries that are so infected with Islamic supremacism?

The American people clearly get it. According to a new poll conducted by McLaughlin & Associates, 84% of Americans believe immigration from the Middle East is very or somewhat dangerous. These sentiments are shared by 75% of Democrats, 80% of Blacks, and 90% of Hispanics. The poll also found that just 25% of Americans and 38% of Democrats want to bring in Syrian refugees.

The question for Republican politicians next week as they debate the funding for refugees in the Omnibus bill is will they take yes for an answer from the American people. (For more from the author of “U.S. Admits 680K Immigrants From Muslim Countries Over 5 Years” please click HERE)

Watch a recent interview with the author below:

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Russia Beefs up Military Assets in Syria in Response to Turkey’s Downing of Jet

Russia ramped up the threat of a military confrontation between Turkey and Moscow Wednesday – a day after a Russian warplane was shot down by Turkey – by announcing that a state-of-the-art air defense missile system will be deployed at a Russian air base in Syria and that all its bombers will now be escorted by fighter jets on their missions.

Russian President Vladmir Putin ordered the S-400 missiles sent to the Hemeimeem air base in Syria’s coastal province of Latakia, just 30 miles away from the border with Turkey, are capable of striking targets within a 250-mile range with deadly precision. The military also moved the navy missile cruiser Moskva closer to the shore to help protect Russian warplanes with its long-range Fort air defense system.

“It will be ready to destroy any aerial target posing a potential danger to our aircraft,” Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said at a meeting with military officials. He also announced the severance of all military ties with Turkey and said that from now on, Russian bombers will always be escorted by fighters on combat missions over Syria.

Tuesday’s incident was the first time in half a century that a NATO member shot down a Russian plane. If Russia responds by downing a Turkish plane, NATO member Turkey could proclaim itself under attack and ask the alliance for military assistance.

Most observers believe that a direct military confrontation is unlikely, but that the shooting down of the plane will further fuel the Syrian conflict and complicate international peace efforts. (Read more from “Russia Beefs up Military Assets in Syria in Response to Turkey’s Downing of Jet” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Austrian ISIS ‘Poster Girl’ Beaten to Death

Austrian newspapers report that the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) beat to death Samra Kesinovic, a teen recruit whose flight to Syria became a major international story earlier this year, when she attempted to escape the radical Islamic group.

A Tunisian woman told Kronen Zeitung that she had lived with Kesinovic and other young female recruits in Raqqa, Syria, the de facto capital of ISIS. But the Austrian government could not confirm or deny the woman’s comments . . .

The tabloids, along with British outlets, did not provide specific details about Kesinovic’s death. Israeli expert of the United Nations Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTED) David Scharia said her friend Sabina Selimovic perished in September 2014 during fighting.

“The parents of the girl concerned have been informed that there is a risk that their daughter is dead,” said Konrad Kogler, the director-general of public security for Austrian police, at the time.

Keinovic allegedly wanted to return home late last year. Both girls reached out to their parents and said they were “sick of living with the Islamic State.” But they did not think they could return home because they have been publicly identified as jihadists. (Read more from “Austrian ISIS ‘Poster Girl’ Beaten to Death” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Cyber-Thieves ‘Target Christmas Shoppers’

Cyber-thieves are preparing malware and spam campaigns in a bid to catch out retailers and shoppers during the run-up to Christmas, experts say.

One gang had updated the sophisticated malware it used to target tills in stores, security company iSight said.

There had also been an increase in spam and phishing emails crafted to catch out people seeking bargains.

And some crime groups had made fake copies of popular shopping apps in a bid to steal payment-card data.

The warnings are being given just prior to Black Friday and Cyber Monday, which bracket the weekend following the US Thanksgiving holiday, when many online and offline stores offer special deals. (Read more from “Cyber-Thieves ‘Target Christmas Shoppers'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Obama Just Responded to Downed Russian Plane With Startling Message to Putin; Russia: Video “Proves” Jet Never Entered Turkish Airspace [+video]

By Randy DeSoto. President Obama blamed Russia on Tuesday for its warplane being shot down by the Turkish air force.

Speaking alongside French President Francois Hollande, Obama said that officials are still gathering facts and urged the two sides to avoid escalating the situation.

“Turkey, like every country, has a right to defend its territory and its airspace,” the president said.

“I do think that this points to an ongoing problem with the Russian operations,” he added. “In the sense that they are operating very close to a Turkish border, and they are going after moderate opposition that are supported by not only Turkey but a wide range of countries.”

He said that if Russia directed its efforts toward the Islamic State, “some of those conflicts, or potentials for mistakes or escalation, are less likely to occur,” according to Fox News . . .

As reported by Western Journalism, earlier today Russian President Vladimir Putin denounced Turkey’s actions as a “stab in the back by the terrorists’ accomplices.” He warned of “significant consequences” for relations with the nation. (Read more from “Obama Just Responded to Downed Russian Plane With Startling Message to Putin” HERE)

_____________________________________

Russian Defense Ministry Video Proves Su-24 Never Entered Turkish Airspace

By Sputnik News [this is a “news” agency funded by the Russian government]. While authorities in Ankara have insisted that it shot down the Russian Su-24 bomber after the aircraft entered Turkish airspace, the Russian Defense Ministry has released video proving that the plane never left Syrian airspace.

According to a leaked letter written to the UN Security Council by the Turkish Ambassador, Turkey’s military justified the shooting down of a Russian bomber by claiming that the aircraft had entered Turkish airspace for 17 seconds.

(Read more from “Russian Defense Ministry Video Proves Su-24 Never Entered Turkish Airspace” HERE)

_____________________________________

Turkmen Forces in Syria Admit to War Crimes by Claiming They Killed Parachuting Russian Pilot

By Reuters. Turkmen forces in Syria shot dead the two pilots of a Russian jet downed by Turkish warplanes near the border with Turkey on Tuesday as they descended with parachutes, a deputy commander of a Turkmen brigade told reporters.

(Read more HERE about the illegal killing of the pilot of the downed Russian plane)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Team Rubio’s Pathetic National Security Attack on Cruz

We are now back to the arsonist blaming the firefighter for arson, again.

This time Marco Rubio’s backers have really stepped in it with Iowa voters by running an ad insinuating that Cruz is responsible for Paris-style terror attacks because he voted to reform the NSA bulk data collection. The Cruz campaign probably couldn’t pay Team Rubio enough money to continue running those ads because Iowa voters hate the mass surveillance state.

Sean Noble, a Rubio backer, is running $200,000 worth of ads in Iowa through his 501(c)4 group assailing Cruz as weak on national security because he championed the Freedom Act. This is a line of attack recently lodged by Rubio himself and dutifully picked up in the beltway “conservative” media over the past week. What is so pathetic about this attack is that voters oppose the NSA bulk data collection and this bill was sponsored by Sen. Mike Lee to strike a balance between preserving the vital tools needed to track terrorists and ensuring that the NSA doesn’t cast a wide net around all Americans.

Not only was this bill supported by Sen. Lee, it garnered the support of Sens. Cory Gardner (R-CO) and Steve Daines (R-Mt), two supporters of Rubio. A number of House members supporting Rubio for president voted for the Freedom Act as well. All but 47 Republicans voted for the bill, and a good number of the no votes felt the Freedom Act didn’t go far enough in curtailing the NSA.

In fact, Mr. Noble worked for Sen. Jeff Flake who also voted for the Freedom Act. I guess his boss and all of Rubio’s backers are also weak on national security.

The reality is that no surveillance state is robust enough to compensate for the security risks incurred from the massive immigration, particularly from stateless Middle East refugees, Rubio planned to bring in under the Gang of 8 bill. This line of attack from Rubio really speaks to the dyslexic national security priorities he shares with Sens. McCain and Graham. They believe we should get involved in every Islamic civil war in the Middle East and supported the arming of Al Qaeda in Libya, and now in Syria. Then they support open borders and the importation of Islamic refugees from the civil wars in which they involved us. Finally, they want a mass surveillance state to attempt to cure the problems they caused.

How about not supporting Islamist rebels and the Arab Spring that gave rise to ISIS in the first place? How about supporting Cruz’s immigration plan that speaks to the direct threat of importing Islamists to our own shores? How about supporting Cruz’s bill to strip citizenship from those who are actually caught fighting for ISIS.

Team Rubio seems to have its constitutional arguments and national security/immigration policies flipped on its head. Their arguments might have gained some resonance against a Ron Paul-style challenger, but against Cruz that dog won’t hunt. (For more from the author of “Team Rubio’s Pathetic National Security Attack on Cruz” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Fact Check: Claims ‘No Refugees’ Since 9/11 Took Part in Terror Plots Ring False

Photo Credit: Fox News After the deadly terrorist attacks in Paris last week, many news sources claimed that not a single refugee had been charged with terrorism in the U.S. since the attacks on 9/11, but the assertion does not stand up to scrutiny.

The noted publication The Economist proclaimed: “750,000 refugees have been resettled in America since 9/11; Not one has been arrested on domestic terrorism charges.”

In fact, several refugees have been convicted in high-profile terrorism plots, and several more were “asylees” — people allowed to stay in the U.S. for the same reasons as refugees, but who do not go through the same screening process. In one case, two Iraqi refugees in Kentucky were convicted after it turned out they had used IEDs to attack U.S. soldiers in Iraq and were plotting other attacks. An FBI agent recalled that they bragged about that and said they had soldiers “for lunch and dinner… meaning that he had killed them,” ABC News reported an FBI official as saying in 2013.

A Department of Justice report noted that one of those refugees, Waad Ramadan Alwan, left fingerprints on unexploded IEDs in Iraq and that he was sentenced to 40 years in prison after he “pleaded guilty to conspiring to kill U.S. nationals abroad; conspiring to use a weapon of mass destruction (explosives) against U.S. nationals abroad; distributing information on the manufacture and use of IEDs; attempting to provide material support to terrorists and to [Al Qaeda in Iraq] and conspiring to transfer, possess and export Stinger missiles.”

His conspirator, Mohanad Shareef Hammadi, was also let in through the refugee program and is now serving a life sentence. (Read more from “Fact Check: Claims ‘No Refugees’ Since 9/11 Took Part in Terror Plots Ring False” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.