California Refuses to Admit Its Voter Fraud Problem

Hollywood has always loved making films about the walking dead, but in Southern California it appears they have a real life problem with “zombie” voters.

An investigation by CBSLA2 and KCAL9 found that hundreds of deceased persons are still on voter registration rolls in the area, and that many of these names have been voting for years in Los Angeles.

For example, John Cenkner died in 2003 according to Social Security Administration records, yet he voted in the 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008 and 2010 elections. His daughter told the station that she was “astounded” and couldn’t “understand how anybody” could get away with this.

Another voter, Julita Abutin, died in 2006 but voted in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. According to CBS, the county confirmed they have “signed vote-by-mail envelopes” from Abutin since she passed away. So either someone has been forging her signature or her ghost has quite an earthly presence.

The investigation revealed that 265 deceases persons voted in Southern California, 215 of them in Los Angeles County. Thirty-two were repeat voters, with eight posthumously-cast ballots each. One woman who died in 1988 has been voting for 26 years, including in the 2014 election.

This report comes twenty years after the contested election of Rep. Loretta Sanchez. D-Calif., from this same area. An investigation by a U.S. House committee found that hundreds of illegal ballots were cast by noncitizens and improper absentee ballots.

In that 1996 election, when she defeated incumbent Bob Dornan, a winning margin of 979 votes was whittled down to only 35 votes or fewer when that voter fraud was factored in. In cases like these, where elections are decided by only a small number of votes, the harmful effects of voter fraud are most obvious.

Yet here, two decades later, California has still not taken the necessary steps to ensure the reliability of its electoral system.

As a result of the investigation, L.A. county supervisors called for an investigation into the findings. Even if these particular zombie voters did not change the outcome of an election, each fraudulently cast ballot stole and diluted the vote of a legitimate voter.

Cases like these and many others show that voter fraud is a real phenomenon and a potential threat to the integrity of the election process.

The Los Angeles county registrar pointed to the 1200-2000 voter registrations removed every month to update records and told reporters, “There’s really no way to connect a person whose death is recorded with a person who is registered to vote unless we get some kind of notification from the family.”

But that is plain nonsense. Other states do frequent comparisons between their voter registration lists and the death databases maintained by the Social Security Administration, and other state agencies consult vital records departments in order to remove voters who have died.

The CBS investigation shows both that voter fraud exists and that this type of fraudulent voting is detectable through proper investigation.

CBS reports that California is the only state that does not comply with the Help America Vote Act of 2002, something the Obama administration has basically ignored.

The Help America Vote Act establishes mandatory minimum standards of accuracy for state voter registration lists and requires states to engage in regular maintenance and updates to remove ineligible voters who die or move away.

California is obviously not complying with these requirements. (For more from the author of “California Refuses to Admit Its Voter Fraud Problem” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

ONE NIGHT IN BENGHAZI: Mark ‘Oz’ Geist Recounts a Tale of Heroism

Editor’s note: Below are the video and transcript to Mark Geist’s live interview with Truth Revolt editor and Shillman Journalism Fellow Mark Tapson at the David Horowitz Freedom Center’s 2016 West Coast Retreat. The event was held April 8-10 at the Terranea Resort in Palos Verdes, CA.

Mark Tapson: I have the distinct privilege tonight to share the stage with one of the heroes of the 2012 Benghazi attacks and the coauthor of the book “Thirteen Hours.” How many people here have either read the book or seen the movie “Thirteen Hours” or both? Okay, pretty good. I strongly recommend both. The book is a page-turning thriller and the movie is one of the best action flicks ever, and I’m a big action movie fan, but both of these have a key difference in them and that’s that the events that they depict were real and they were as serious as a heart attack. And that adds a very affecting emotional dimension to both reading the book and watching the movie, so I recommend them both.

I hadn’t met Mark Geist until this evening when I came down for dinner, and I spotted someone who looked like he knows 19 different ways to kill you with his bare hands. And then I realized, “Oh, that’s Louie Gohmert.” But then I looked slightly to the right and I thought, “Oh, there’s a guy who looks like he knows 20 ways to kill you with his bare hands,” and that was Mark Geist. After talking with Mark a little bit beforehand, I realized that he and I have a lot in common, actually. First of all we’re both named Mark, which I consider very significant. Second, he is a highly trained elite warrior who went from the U.S. military to a clandestine operation protecting American covert intelligence operations in one of the most dangerous hot spots in the world. And I too am named Mark. So, that’s about the extent of it. And I say that not to just make a self-deprecating joke, but to highlight something that’s very apparent about Mark Geist when you either read the book or watch the movie, and that is that Mark and his brothers in arms are a breed apart. To paraphrase George Orwell or supposedly George Orwell, they are the rough men who stand ready and enable the rest of us to sleep peacefully in our beds at night. As much as everyone would like me to continue talking I’m going to bring Mark Geist up now and have a chat with him. So, please welcome Mark Geist.

Let me begin by taking the liberty of speaking for everyone here when I thank you for your service in the Marine Corps.

Mark Geist: Thank you.

Mark Tapson: Or as our president would call it, the “Marine Corpse.” And thanks also for your courage under fire in Benghazi and for risking your life to do the right thing.

Mark Geist: Thank you very much.

Mark Tapson: Thanks also for coming here to talk with us.

Mark Geist: Thank you.

Mark Tapson: Let me get started with a question here. Let’s start at the beginning. How did you wind up in Benghazi and what is your background? How did that bring you to being in Benghazi in 2012?

Mark Geist: I think for me it all started — I had a grandfather who was one of my inspirations. The person I looked up to. He was a tank commander in Patton’s army going across Europe. Had five purple hearts. He never really talked about what happened until the day I got home from boot camp and then that’s when he would talk to me because I didn’t rate getting talked to about what happened until then. I don’t know if I still rate. I think what they did was a wonderful thing and going through that because it’s not like it is today. He got injured, he’d go to the rear and then he’d get well enough to go back and just do it all over again. Now we don’t really — I mean we do that if it’s minor injuries, but major injuries you’re going home. But then I had three uncles. One that was in the Marine Corps for ten years from 1958 to 1968, did two and a half tours in Vietnam. Another uncle that did 28 years in the Navy and another uncle that did four years, so that sense of service, I’m not sure it’s genic or not. I believe it is, honestly. That sense of service its bred into you or we just know what we want to do. When I was young, when I went to kindergarten I think it was, my mom had bought this little book. It had a little folder in it you put your school picture in and then on the back it said, “What do you want to be when you grow up?” and it had for boys and for girls. You could mark either a dentist or a doctor and then on the other side it had soldier or fireman, and when I was in kindergarten I wanted to be a soldier. And all the way up through probably fifth grade I was either a soldier or a fireman or a police officer. Luckily I’ve gotten to do all of those throughout my life. I’ve got those checked off my bucket list, but that took me in when I grew up in a small town.

Six months before I graduated a friend of mine came up and said, “Hey, you want to join the Marine Corps with me?” I’m like, “Well, what are we going to do?” He’s like, “We’re going to go jump out of airplanes. We get to shoot things and all of that.” I’m like, “I’m in.” All my teachers at school were like, “Thank goodness. So we don’t have to have him back next year.” Now they knew that I was going to go somewhere and they didn’t have to worry if I was going to come back. So I went into the Marine Corps ten days after I graduated high school and it’s just been a wonderful ride and a wonderful career ever since. I did 12 years in the Marine Corps. Started out in the infantry. I worked as what in the Marine Corps we call a “STA platoonist,” surveillance and target acquisition. It’s snipers and battalion reconnaissance, and then I was a counter-terrorism instructor for about four years. And then I lateral moved over to be an interrogator/translator, and the Marine Corps sent me to school to learn Persian Farsi as a second language.

I got out of the Marine Corps because I was gone all the time. I was married. I had a young boy about a year-and-a-half at the time. I decided I got to do the family thing and keep the marriage together so I got out. I become a cop. Got divorced anyways. That takes you away just as much as it does being in the military, but you’re home and being away, which was even harder for my first wife to understand. I was a cop for six years and then I got kind of bored with that. Not enough excitement in my life, so I started doing bounty hunting and I thought that would be fun. So I figured now I can go kick down people’s doors in civilian clothes and see if I can get them to go back to jail, take them back. But that was kind of — some months it was diamond, most months it was coal. So when the work kicked off, I just had this real passion to get back into it and serve. I still have that sense of service, and I think that’s one thing that all military guys have. Everybody that serves in the military has that sense of service. That sense of purpose when they’re serving this country, and when you get out you miss that. You don’t have that, and a lot of people struggle with it, and I think that’s one of the things. It’s just not a PTS — I don’t call it “PTSD” because it’s not a disorder. It’s just post-traumatic stress. We can all get it from a lot of different things, but a lot of our soldiers and sailors and airmen and Marines battle with that sense of service after they get out, and I think that’s one thing the contracting thing did for me is it allowed me to get back into it. Serve with my brothers, and I got back over into Iraq in 2004 and pretty much in and out of every country that has “-stan” at the end of it for the last 30 years.

Mark Tapson: What prompted you to go to Benghazi though? How did you end up specifically there doing that security work?

Mark Geist: I’d been in a couple other different countries; Pakistan, like I said, anything that said “-stan” after it pretty much. I had been in that country, and when they came up and it was like, “Hey, we need people to go to Benghazi,” and it’s like there was every place we’d go when we were — I was with GRS, it’s called Global Response Staff, and every place we were stationed at was because it was dangerous. Very dangerous. But Benghazi, it was new. It’s that Wild West, and it was one of the worst ones. So it’s like, “Hey, I want to go there.” That’s just where I wanted to go. When Syria started opening up, that’s where I put my bid in to go there because, I don’t know. I can’t explain it. I just like going to those places that people love me so much.

Mark Tapson: So not only did you know what you were walking into, you sought it out. You were eager for that. You were looking for that.

Mark Geist: Yeah.

Mark Tapson: Okay. What was the security situation like in Benghazi when you got there? When you and your team got there.

Mark Geist: To kind of paint the picture for you, you have a city of approximately 150,000 people. There was probably ten-fifteen different militias that were vying for control. You would have one militia that controlled the airport. You would have another militia that controlled the sea port. Another one, the truck traffic. I think the only thing I can really compare it to here in America was how the mafia tried to control things back in the 1920s. Just different groups trying to control this and some of them were sophisticated, and then they would recruit just like ISIS does today. You’ve got a percentage of them that are very sophisticated, and then they recruit. The majority of the people they recruit are very unsophisticated. They go in and they say, “Hey, here’s $50,000.00. I need your sons to come fight for us.” And their sons are willing to do that because there’s five, or six, or seven of them, and this is a great place to go and earn martyrdom for the family, so generations will sing songs and talk about them, and the family’s taken care of by earning that money. So a lot of them, that’s what they’re doing. They’re going to join that militia to fight. And some of the militias were quasi-friendly The one that the State Department, and me and Tonto and Tig always joke is probably the worst outsourcing ever done in American history was the State Department outsourcing some of their security to the February 17 Martyrs Brigade. They were the actual militia who started the revolution, and it was February 17 when the revolution started, and that’s how they got their name. And it was just a conglomeration of people that came together to fight under that banner until Kaddafi was gone. Because when Kaddafi’s there they had to calm an enemy. “Now that he’s gone, then we get to fight for our each individual little piece of that pie.”

Mark Tapson: When you were there in Benghazi, you and your brothers, your fellow shooters, as you called yourselves, Kris Paronto and Jack Silva and John Tiegen and D.B. Benton and Tyrone Woods, the team leader, you were there to protect what they call the compound and the Annex. Can you describe that, like how that works, how close those two are to each other and what the security situation there was like?

Mark Geist: We were about three-quarters of a mile apart, and to kind of tell you a little bit of the difference between the two of us is the six of us that were with GRS or Global Response Staff worked for the Culinary Institute of America or better known as the CIA. Our job was to protect case officers when they went out in town so they could worry about doing their job and we would take care of the security part of it. And between the six of us we had over 100 years of experience doing counter-insurgency operations around the world. One night were talking about it and probably close to 80 different countries between the six of us we’d all been in. That’s just what we were drawn to do, and the State Department had five diplomatic security personnel. They call them DS or “diplomatic security” officers, and talking with them, the best I can guess is they had about 20 or 30 years of experience to protect an ambassador. They were on a compound that was eight acres in size. Our compound was about the size of a football field. We had to run around the inside of it five times just to make a mile, to kind of give you an idea. If in the movie you see James Dale Badge, who portrays Tyrone Woods, pulling around that tire, that’s exactly what we did. We had a toe strap that we’d hooked to that and we just went around dragging that thing for exercise because it wasn’t very big. You didn’t have a lot of space to do that. We were about three-quarters of a mile away as the crow flies, so anything that was happening over there like the night of 9/11 we could see the fire. I could see the reflection of that and the smoke coming up and the tracers flying across the night. As the guys were sitting there chomping at the bit to get out there while Bob kept telling them to stand down or to wait, which I guess is just a matter of semantics. Telling you to wait or stand down is pretty much the same thing in our eyes.

Mark Tapson: And Bob was the CIA, the local CIA chief there?

Mark Geist: Yeah, he was what we call the “chief of base,” so he was the guy that was in charge of our base, the annex for Benghazi, and then his boss would be the chief of station.

Mark Tapson: How was the GRS team perceived by people like Bob and the other non-shooters as you call them there? Were they grateful to have you guys there and have their backs?

Mark Geist: On 9/13 they were. Most of them were. It all depended on the different places. I’ve worked in a bunch of different places and some of them, the guys you worked with were just really thankful. They used our skills. They knew what we had, and they knew what our capabilities were, so they would utilize that as an asset. Then you had those — we’d joke about it, but those ivy leaguers that thought they were Jason Bourne. They go to school. They go to the farm. They come off the farm and they watch Jason Bourne and they’re going to save the world. They’re going out there. They’re altruistic. They want to do their job. They want to be that spy that’s going to find that one asset that’s going to give them the guy that found that information that got that guy that led to Osama Bin Laden. They want to be that guy. That’s the essence of guys in security. If I’ve been doing a protection detail, whether it’s overseas in Iraq or if I’m doing it here in Hollywood, for security, me and that individual I’m protecting always have conflict because their job is to get out there and see people and be exposed, and my job is to keep them from being overly exposed, so that threat doesn’t get there. As security officers, you’re going to always have that conflict.

Mark Tapson: Your buddy, Chris Paronto, says that Bob considered you guys basically glorified Walmart security guards, initially.

Mark Geist: Yeah, Kris or “Tonto” in the movie, Tonto and Bob had a unique relationship. It was kind of like water and oil or water and gasoline. They just didn’t mix well.

Mark Tapson: Well, the book is obviously about not just you, but your coauthors and your cohorts too, but what happened to you specifically on the night of the attack? Where were you when you discovered something really serious was going down and how did you respond?

Mark Geist: Me and the female case officer were out for, I guess, easiest way to explain it is we went out on a dinner date and we met a local Libyan couple and went for dinner at their house to kind of have a discussion. When I got a call about half-way, two-thirds through it on my cellphone, and Tyrone called and said, “Hey, you need to get back to the Annex. Just stay away from the consulate,” and he called on an open source or an open line cellphone, which is an unencrypted, unsecured device. So he wasn’t going to say anything more than that, and I knew if he was going to call and interrupt a meeting or interrupt a dinner date then there must be something really significant. So I had to get the female case officer and kind of break her away from what she was doing, talking with them, and again that’s where that security — I’m worried about security. We need something to do. I’m not going to say what’s going on in front of her because I don’t need to let anyone else know, and I have to encourage her in a very polite, but forceful manner, to get into the car.

When we get into the car we’re heading back and we turn on the radio, and that’s when we start hearing what’s going on over at the consulate. And you hear somebody come over the radio and they’re setting the buildings on fire. You can hear when they key the mic to the radio. You can hear the gun fire, the machine guns and the explosions. Then all the sudden they come over and they say, “If you guys don’t get here now we’re all going to die.” They used a few expletives in there that we can reserve, but you could hear that passion and that desire, that fear that they thought they were going to die. It was at that time that the car I was going in probably went from about 80 to 120 mile an hour and the female case officer, she started talking too much, trying to tell me what to do and that we need to do this or what do you think about this, and I just kind of looked at her. I’m like, “Hey, you know you need to shut up. You’re in my world now. I need your eyes not your mouth. I need you to be looking for what’s the threats out there.” Because that’s what she would be good for right then. I can’t see everything. She can cover that side of the road, and if there’s a threat I need to know it. And we made our way back to the Annex. When we got back to the Annex, the guys at the Annex had already left because they heard that same thing of if you don’t get here now we’re going to all die. That’s why after having three stand down orders they didn’t even ask for permission after that. They just jumped in the vehicles, and the guy at the gate opened it up and they just headed over.

Mark Tapson: I’m going to get to the stand down order in just a minute, but first let me ask you. Did you ever hear anything prior to the attack about the locals protesting a blasphemous YouTube video regarding Islamic prophet Mohammed? Did you at any time feel like the attackers were just locals motivated by this video or was it your sense immediately, I mean at the time, that at least some of these guys were literally terrorist and that it was a calculated attack?

Mark Geist: That’s a loaded question, but you’re right. It’s obvious.

Mark Tapson: Just from your perspective.

Mark Geist: I’ve been in and out of the Middle East for 30 years and I’ve never — well, I can’t say never because that’s too – 99.9 percent of the time I can say I’ve never seen a protest at night because it kind of defeats the whole purpose being dark because a protest is to get attention drawn to you, not to be hiding. They didn’t have signs, they weren’t chanting. They brought AK 47s, RPGs and machine guns instead of signs and chanting and bullhorns. So it’s pretty obvious what it was. In October, about mid-October I got out of the hospital and I was able to see some of the footage from the security cameras, and from the drones overhead and you could see the guys, who they were, and you could tell — I mean anybody’s that been in the military knows a guy, how he carries a weapon. How he walks. What he’s looking for. If he’s trained or if he’s not. So that was easy. There’s no way it was a protest.

Mark Tapson: Let’s talk about the stand down order. Tell us about that. You received a stand down order from Bob, right? The CIHE.

Mark Geist: Yeah, and it was the five guys that were at the Annex because I was out in town at that time, but they’re the ones who actually got the stand down order.

Mark Tapson: Do you know if that was Bob’s decision or he was relaying something from higher ups? What did he say if anything about that?

Mark Geist: He never really quantified why he did that, but from our experience — and Tig had the most experience dealing with Bob at least in country because he was on his fourth trip to Benghazi. When we say a trip, a trip for us is usually about 60 to 70 days, so Tig had been there since 2011 in and out. He’d been in Benghazi for three different trips and Bob was always that way. In the movie at the very beginning when you see Jack and Roan get caught at that checkpoint and have to talk their way out of it and Bob wouldn’t let the QRF, which is the Quick Reaction Force, go, that really happened. The only difference is it happened at night and it was Ansar al-Shari at checkpoint, who are the same terrorist organization that attacked us on 9/11, and they held them there for about an hour-and-a-half, not just 15-20 minutes. Our job as a QRF — and this is where I don’t know if it was lack of trust or faith or not knowing what the capabilities of the asset were as our QRF. Our QRF was only a two-person team, but their job was to get within — so that checkpoint where they got held up was about 30 minutes away. Thirty minutes is a long fire fight and a lot can happen, so as our QRF I may just get in the area and hang out and see what happens. I’m not going to go in there and kind of escalate things. I’m just going to sit there and get close enough where if I’m needed I can be there. If I’m not then I can just disappear into the shadows again.

Mark Tapson: So once you did get back, take us through the night from your perspective. What happened to you and what you did.

Mark Geist: Like you said, our compound, we had our front gate and it was really difficult. Our front gate, there was a main road that came in front of it or a paved road, but there were walls in every compound overseas. At least in the Middle East, every house has a 12 foot wall around it. A big metal gate that you have to come in and out of. So that would have been on the south side. Our back gate was on the east side. On the east side there was also a house, and it’s depicted in the movie very well where there were some kids there. They would always come over and throw firecrackers over the wall just to kind of – they loved to harass us. I think they were terrorists in training. Then behind us was a, I guess the closest thing would be like a feed yard or a stock yard for sheep, which about three days before they had brought a couple hundred sheep in and then put them in the pens, and it was getting on towards Eid. Eid is when they’re going to do the great big sacrifice. Everybody comes and buys a sheep, takes it out and sacrifices it. They were getting ready for that.

After everyone got back from the consulate the guys had went over, had pushed off about 40 personnel because there was about 40 enemy personnel that took over the consulate area. The five guys, Tig, Tyrone, Jack, D.B. and Tonto, had moved in two different elements. Three guys in one element. Two guys in the other with some of the Feb 17 guys kind of tagging along were able to push over 40 guys off the consulate and take that back over. And when they did that that’s when they started searching for the ambassador. The buildings there had already been set on fire and, to kind of paint the picture, if in a building this size or this room, everything from about here up was just black smoke. You couldn’t see the end for your riffle. So Tig and Tyrone are going in and out of this building looking for the ambassador because Jack and Dave Ubben had gone in and they had been able to find Shawn Smith’s body, and they had brought him out. So the only one we were looking for, the only person unaccounted for, was the ambassador. And this was about 10 o’clock by the time they got onto the compound. They had done that several times. A counter-attack came from the back gate of the consulate. They repealed that counter-attack. They got word that there was over 100 people massing outside, so the decision was made at that point, and this was about two hours later. We haven’t been able to find the ambassador. We don’t know if he’s still in the building or if they maybe had kidnapped him.

So, we’ve got five of us here because the State Department security personnel had left to get back to the Annex, and they had to make the decision to either fight off a hundred people or make their way out. So they make their way back to the Annex at that time. When they got over there we kind of heard a lot of the people – well, the State Department guys when they went out the front gate we had told them to go left and they ended up turning right because that’s kind of their muscle memory. They always went that way to come to our location. Well, unfortunately, I would say three compounds down, there was an Al Qaeda safe house, and we found out about it that night. We knew that. They like to fly that black flag all the time. They drove past that house and that’s where the attack had came from. And they got ambushed there. Luckily they were in a fully armored Level 6 Toyota Land Cruiser, which, by the time they got over to the Annex, it probably had a couple hundred bullet holes in it; they had got shot up.

Our guys, when they went out instead of turning right they made sure they turned left and came back, and they were pretty much unaccosted. We started setting up our defensive positions and filling in all the holes there when the guys that followed over, the State Department guys, started coming up on our northeast side. They were going to come in and breach our back gate, and at this point we knew that most people in Libya didn’t know who we were. They knew, of course, that this blonde-haired, blue-eyed gringo was – I’m not going to hide, I’m not going to blend in as a Libyan — but they thought we were Westerners from Europe and no use giving them any reason to think otherwise. But as they’re coming up, we let them get fairly close, probably within about 25-30 yards, and one of them threw a bomb over the fence, and it’s a gelatina bomb. I saw it coming over the fence and it landed in between me and Tig and blew up. Luckily, it didn’t have any shrapnel and that’s what initiated the first fire fight.

There was pretty much a probe. They were coming in, they were trying to shoot out our perimeter lights. There was myself and Tig. He came up and jumped up beside me. I was in the northeast corner on the tower. Tonto and D.B. were up on top of what we would call Building B, so we pretty much had them in a crossfire. Really there was four of us. There was probably 10-15 of them, and they were kind of outnumbered, so we pretty much made short work of it. I don’t mean to sound crass about it, but it was – you know the midway game that you play at the county fair or whatever, that’s whack-a-mole. That’s what it was like. One of them would stick their head up, you’d shoot them, he’d go down. So it just happened real quick. We were done in about 10-15 minutes, and they were pulling their dead back and their wounded, and they kind of fell back. This was getting on to about 1 o’clock when we heard that the – we had a support team that was coming down from Tripoli and that was Glen Doherty, or “Bub” was his call sign, and that group. They were able to acquire, rent, lease or whatever, a civilian aircraft from somebody. This is where several times throughout that night we all feel, at least I know me, Tig and Tonto — and we know the other guys do as well, but I’m speaking for them because I’ve heard them talk about it — we know God’s hand was in on this because there’s six of us and throughout the night there was anywhere between 15 and 50 attackers at one time. The six of us, we were able – and it wasn’t all six of us engaging at one time. Like when they were attacking from the northeast side, there was four of us against whatever number that was. So we know that there was a greater power providing their protection over us that night.

Mark Tapson: But you guys had also discussed this very security scenario beforehand in the time long before the attacks. You guys talked over various things that might happen.

Mark Geist: Yeah.

Mark Tapson: Including a mass attack on the compound. How well did that serve you? Talk through that.

Mark Geist: In the Marine Corps, when I was a staff sergeant, I used to train my guys and it was you got your six P’s: prior planning prevents piss poor performance. You’ve got to talk things through. We war game things. If we can’t actually go through the motions with it, if we’ve got 10 minutes down time on a wet board, we may just draw the compound and say, “Okay, hey, if this happens what are we going to do? Okay, if they do this, what’s going to happen? If they get over our walls, what’s going to happen?” So we all know without having to get on the radio and say, “Hey, I’m going here” or “you’re going there.” It just happens. It’s a smooth-oiled machine. What helps with that is again, it’s the experience that we’ve all had working in the special-ops community. Having that military training of the initiative, that never quit, that always driving forward and being the best that you can be. Quoting the commercial, but that’s what it is. That’s how the military trains you. That’s how the good instructors, the good platoon commanders, the good platoon sergeants, they train their guys to always prep for the unknown. The six of us had never worked together before that time period there. Me and Tig had been there about a month, a little bit more. The rest of the guys had been there about, I think 70 days. They were extending to get there a little bit longer. Doing those things kind of really helps, and there’s really lessons to be learned for businesses and organizations along those same lines. Always knowing how you’re going to deal with an adversity that comes up within your business ahead of time. Thinking about that forward. Then you know how to deal with it.

Mark Tapson: As the night went on, and help was not coming, what did you think was going to happen? Did you think, we can keep this up for a while, we can hold them off for a couple days if we have to, or did you think this is it, we’re eventually going to be overwhelmed? Maybe by morning or noon or something if we don’t get help.

Mark Geist: No, there’s no way they were going to take us over. We knew we had plenty of ammo because I think we had roughly, I don’t remember the exact count, probably 30,0000 rounds between the six of us, so there was like 30,000 of them that could have came. We might have missed a couple times.

Mark Tapson: One shot, one kill?

Mark Geist: Yeah. We had just gotten a food shipment in like two days before, so we knew we’d have food shipped in about every two weeks. So we were good for a couple weeks. The only thing we didn’t have was protection from indirect fire, which would be like artillery or mortars or that stuff that comes down from the sky and that happened.

Mark Tapson: Before the mortar hit you actually got hit in the face with some shrapnel earlier on when a shot went around just above your —

Mark Geist: Yeah, when they were shooting out the lights and I didn’t get to see the outside. I talked to a guy that had gotten to get back to Benghazi later after 9/11 or 9/12 even and he asked me, he says, “How did you guys even survive that?” because the wall that we were standing at, me and Tig were standing at, was just pockmarked with bullet holes. When one of those hit, some of either the cement or the lead off the bullet had hit me across the nose. Another piece had ricocheted and hit Tig in the side, but it was just a minor flesh wound, so not too bad.

Mark Tapson: What about when the mortar hit? Tell us about that and the aftermath.

Mark Geist: We’d had two attacks at our place. The second one we’d had about 20 or probably twice as many people as the first one. Probably 20 or 30 people. They again came exactly the same way. We were able to repel that one. That one lasted probably 15 or 20 minutes and then things got real quiet. It was getting on about 2 o’clock in the morning. It was about that time that we had gotten information. Somebody called and said that the ambassador was at the hospital. What actually happened is, one of the neighbors after the fires had burned down — and at that point was when there were looters on the consulate grounds. They had been able to get back into that building, and they found that the ambassador had kind of been trapped in between his bed and the wall, and they pulled his body out. When the neighbors saw it, he knew who he was, and liked him because Ambassador Stevens was loved by the majority of the Libyans in Benghazi, most of us were. If they knew that we were Americans, they’d come up and they want to give us tea, and these are the people that are just your everyday people. They’re the ones that are like all of us in here that go to work every day, that have kids that are going to school. They’re the shopkeepers and the store-owners, and those people love that America came in and got rid of Kadaffi. But there was a power vacuum left and that’s when the evil people came in and formed up the militias. They’re always going to find that. They’re going to take advantage of those situations.

So the guys from Tripoli had made it into the airport. They were trying to make their way into our place. And I had moved from the location I was at; got up on the roof where Dave Ubben was and Tyrone were. The rooftop was about 40 by 30 feet, and Dave Ubben was on one side, me and Tyrone were on the other. It was kind of quiet, and things were slowing down. The tempo was down, so you’re just talking about what’s going on. Me and Roan were talking about our kids because he had a, I think it was a 16- or 18-month-old baby boy. My little girl was 7 1/2 months at that time. Tig’s twins, a boy and girl, were two weeks older than my little girl. Tonto had two children that I think were like six and eight, and Jack, him and his wife had two boys, and they just found out that day that his wife was pregnant. It was surprising that there’s that many little kids between the six of us. And then Tyrone looks at me and says, “Hey, Oz, these are some of the best warriors I’ve ever fought with,” which really meant a lot to me because this is coming from a guy who has over 20 years in the Navy SEALs, in the SEAL teams, not just in the civilian. This is when we’ve had ten years of war. So you knew he was very experienced. And I’m like, “Yeah, these guys are great,” and you’ve seen it. You just know those guys that have that mettle that you know are going to be there no matter what.

It was about that time the guys from Tripoli showed up. They were able to bribe one of the local militias to drive them from the airport to our compound. The guys from Tripoli showed up. They came inside, and Bub, Glen Doherty, instead of going inside under the safety of the building, he came up on the rooftop. He was the only one that came up on the rooftop of the 67 guys that come down, and he came up there, wanted to say “hi” to Tyrone. See if there’s anything where he can lend a hand. And I’d never met Bub before, so Roan says, “Hey, Oz, this is Bub. He’s a sniper from the teams.” That’s where we worked together, and we’ve worked in Beirut together as well. I’m like, “Well, it’s been quiet, so hopefully we ain’t going to need you, but morning’s coming on, so at least having another riffle up here is going to be a good thing.” He had turned and walked away from me, and he walked to my left and then around to the back, and that’s when a mortar or a rocket hit the back wall, which was an RPG small arms fire; opened up and a mortar hit the top of the wall. When the mortar hit the top of our outer wall, Dave Ubben, who was to my right about 30 feet-40 feet over, screamed out that he was hit. I glanced over and he was to the east of me, and you could see that blue haze as the sun’s getting ready to come up. Right before the attack came morning prayer was going, so the big speakers from the minarets were – the imam is sitting there shouting, “Get your lazy butts in to the mosque so you can praise God” or whatever they were going to do. Right before the attack it just all went quiet. Again, possible indicator that that was the initiator for the attack. With Dave Ubben getting hit and being a small team, we all know that I can’t stop shooting to go help him. He’s got to take care of himself, and the fact that he’s yelling out tells me as a teammate two things. That his heart’s beating and he’s breathing, so I know he can take care of himself. That’s just how it has to be because if I stop then that’s one less gun shooting bad guys and then the bad guys overrun us and we all get killed. You have to have that mettle in you that if you get injured you got to take care of yourself first.

Ty had a machine gun, a belt-fed machine gun, and he comes up, and as he says in the movie, his word was laying hate. Normally if you’re going to fire a machine gun, a belt-fed machine gun, you’re going to do three round burst. We call it a FPF, “final protective fire,” because how many people were shooting at us and to me it was like a sprinkler just mowing down the grass. He just pulled the trigger and was just back and forth like this where they were shooting at us. I was shooting my assault rifle and then the first mortar hit on my right-hand side about 15 feet away and blew up. I was in the middle of changing my magazines. It knocked me back, and as I stood up — the building’s over there, every building — if this is the rooftop there’s a wall around the top of them about 33 1/2 foot tall. You are using that for cover. I’m raising up in a crouched position starting to shoot and as I do I see Tyrone’s in a fetal position at my left and my feet and his guns gone. He’s not shooting, so he’s out of the fight. I turn back to start shooting and as I raised my left hand up I realize that from about 6 inches above the wrist its hanging off at a 90 degree angle. Going through my mind is, I just got to get back in the fight. I got to get my gun back in and I got to start shooting cause there are people trying to kill us. I keep trying to swing my arm up there, trying to grab ahold of that gun, and it’s just not working. That’s when the second mortar hits just about 5 feet-7 feet short of the first one on the rooftops, which actually would have been the third mortar. So the third one hits and I take a quick glance back and I see Glen go straight down on his face. At that point I wasn’t sure if he had just fell down to take cover or if he actually was killed. I turn back and bring my gun back up. I’m trying to reengage and again I can’t get my arm to work. Can’t get my gun to work because I didn’t know it until after the fact, but my gun was pretty much destroyed by all the shrapnel. That second mortar peppered me again with shrapnel, and then shortly after that the last mortar landed and again it hit me with more shrapnel, which the best way I can describe it is it felt like I was getting stung by a thousand bees. Being stubborn I was going to stay there in the fight, but after the last one I figured if there’s going to be a fourth, it’s probably going to take me out, so I better get to some cover.

I dove down to the ground and just got real close to the wall and the ground as far as I could, and everything just went quiet. There was no more fire and no more mortars, so I sat up, and first thing I did is I just felt something wet underneath me. My first thought was I’m bleeding out, so I start reaching in my med bag that I carry on my side, and pull out a tourniquet, and then I realize that what I’m sitting in wasn’t warm. It was cold. So it must be something other than blood. What it was is, they have water tanks on every building because it causes you to have gravity flow water, so you have water pressure in the house. And that thing had gotten perforated. They’re plastic and they get perforated by the shrapnel and flooded the top of the roof. I got distracted again thinking of – I quit worrying about myself and started thinking about Tyrone, wondering if he was okay, so I reached over before I got the tourniquet on — and part of it was shock — and I reach over and grab him and try to check for a pulse, and that’s when I see a shadow come up over top of the rooftop. And that was Tig. Tig comes up over. First person he runs into is Dave Ubben. And Dave Ubben has shrapnel in his face, up above in his sinus cavities. His left arm is almost blown off like mine and his left leg about 6 inches above the ankle is almost severed as well. Tig being the first one up there, being in total disregard for his safety. The debris, all the dust and everything still hadn’t settled by the time he was up there, and he got two tourniquets put on Dave Ubben. Come over to me and saw me sitting there against the wall trying to put my arm back in place. Tells me to quit playing with it. Grabs the tourniquet. He gets the tourniquet on me and he helps me stand up because I know he still has two other people up there he needs to tend to. He’s like, “Hey, can you get over to the ladder?” And I’m like, “Yeah.” So I start walking over to the ladder and that’s when two more guys come up on the rooftop and they’re like, “Hey, can you get down off the ladder by yourself?” And I’m like, “Well, I know I need to.” Going through my mind is I have to because I know they need to take care of Ty and Glen.

I climb up on the box, step up on the side of the wall and sit down, and then the ladder is just like an inch-and-a-half square tubing that we welded together to make a ladder and just leaned it up against the building. I’m sitting there and I’m thinking, I just survived three mortar attacks. Now I’m going to try to get down here by myself. I’m going to fall, break my neck and end up dying that way. And I’m like, that’s going to be bad because you don’t want to die that way. I’m a warrior. I want to die a warrior’s death. They’re going to go home and tell my kids, “Yeah he survived mortar attacks, but he fell and broke his neck because he’s clumsy.” I reached and hooked my good arm around the top rung of the ladder and I just swung my feet around and tried to land them on the ladder, but Murphy’s Law; it’s not going to happen. So I caught myself with my good arm, pulled myself back up, got situated on the ladder, climbed down, walked down around the building, ran into another guy that was coming out who walked me inside and laid me down on the floor. Then he left and went back up on top of the roof to get the other guys down. And while I’m laying there all the case officers, the CIA guys, are standing there. The female, that was – she was there, and they’d turned off all the lights inside now because after the mortar attack they didn’t want the door to open and inadvertently let him know where we were at. Which I’m thinking well, they already know where we’re at, they just hit four mortars within a 30 by 50 foot square area. So they knew where we were at.

So there’s eight sets of eyeballs sitting there looking at me and with flashlights and I’m like, “Hey, somebody get some shears and cut my clothes off because I know I’m bleeding from more than just my arm.” None of them moved. They’re just all looking at me in shock and I’m like, “Somebody get these –” and the only person that jumps to it is the female that I was with and she runs into the med room. I can hear her going through stuff, and all the sudden she yells out, “Oz, where’s the medical shears?” There in the first set of shelves, third one from the top, and I knew that because again it goes back to training. Those key things that you want, those key pieces of equipment. You always put them in the same spot so you always know where they’re at. When it goes back to muscle memory, when you need something, you know where it’s at. She grabbed them. She comes over and she starts to cut my clothes off. About that time the deputy chief of base pulls out his big old buck knife and says here let me help. Again, I’m sitting there thinking — this guy’s shaking, he’s shaking like crazy — I’m thinking he’s going to end up stabbing me and killing me with a knife. Now I survived a mortar. I survived not falling off. Now this guy’s going to end up killing me. There’s another great story for my son to tell, right?

Mark Tapson: So they were all in shock but you weren’t?

Mark Geist: Yeah. So she ended up cutting my clothes off. We ended up finding — I got hit in the neck. Had three holes in chest. Another went in near my femoral artery. I think they counted 30 holes. Most of them weren’t bleeding so bad, so it wasn’t too awful bad. The biggest one was the neck one. We got that one taken care. About that time is when they brought Dave Ubben down.

Mark Tapson: And then after all that, you eventually boarded the plane also out of Benghazi on your own power and said “I walked into this country.” Go ahead.

Mark Geist: They were going to carry me off. I made it to the airport in the back of a pickup truck on a gurney, and then they came over and they were going to try to carry me on the airplane. And before they could even get that, I was like, get out of my way, you know. I walked into this country; I’m walking out. I’m not going horizontal. I’m going vertical. In the plane that we got, that they brought down was a commuter jet basically. It was a small, or a very large Lear jet, or small commuter jet. There was a pilot and copilot, and then there was a flight attendant. This Arab lady. And as I’m walking up to the airplane I’m pretty buck naked, bunch of blood just dripping off me. Holes all over and her eyes are about size of saucers. I’m not sure if that’s because of the blood or because she saw a white guy naked. As I’m walking up, I climb up the stairs, she just disappears to the back of the airplane. I turned the corner to walk down the aisle, I see her running back to the front and she has a hand full of towels, and I’m thinking, okay, well now I can cover up a little bit and all of this. Well, she doesn’t hand me the towels. She starts laying them down on the floor because she’s afraid I’m going to bleed on her boss’s airplane. She doesn’t want to worry about cleaning it up. I go back. I lay down. They bring Dave Ubben in. And Dave Ubben, he’s like 6’4″, 235 pounds, and they have to break out all the pretty cabinets and stuff just to get him in because he can’t walk on. We get him on, get everybody loaded up. We head to Tripoli and get to Tripoli about an hour an half – two hours later, and the first lifesaving me and Dave Ubben had was by Libyan doctors in a Libyan hospital.

Mark Tapson: Let’s talk about the movie for a bit. The book took no creative license, and my sense of the movie is that it took very little also, if any, creative license. Do you feel like Michael Bay, the director, really captured the truth of that night of the attacks?

Mark Geist: He did. We had the chance at the very beginning to meet with him and we meet with him in Miami. He has a house out there. We happen to be out there and set up a meeting. Me, and Tig, and Tonto sat down with him. He’s like, “I really want to do this. I want to bring this out and this and that.” I just interrupted and said from the very beginning, I said, “You know, I know that you’re going to have to change things. You’re going to have to take some creative license with it because we got an event that lasted 13 hours and you’re going to have to put it into two. The only thing I care about is if you bring any disrespect to any of the four dead then I’m just going to beat the living crap out of you.” He says, “Well, you don’t have to worry about that.” I’m like, “I know. I’m not going to worry. You need to.” I think he respected that. That is a true story and he understood how passionate we were about that and he wanted us to understand how passionate he was about getting it right. He told us a little bit later his mom had told him don’t do this movie. It’s a time bomb with all the politics involved and that, and he’s like, “No, you’ve got to read the book mom. You’ve got to read the book.” The only person Michael Bay listens to other than Michael Bay is his mother. He got her the book. She read the book and after she got done with the book she says, “You know Michael, you need to do this movie.”

They did a great job. We were involved in it. They sent us the script. Let us read through the script. There were some things we didn’t like. We changed them. They were okay with that. We did set design, involved with the architects in designing the set to make sure it was as accurate as possible with the limitations they had. When we went back onto our compound it was like walking back into Benghazi. They just shrank it by about 20-25 percent. The consulate was a little bit different just because the area that they had to work with. So things were just a little bit different with the roads and everything, but it was accurate. The events themselves were all accurate. Everything that you pretty much see in the movie happened in real life. The only big explosion that didn’t happen in real life was when the bus — after the second attack, they’re bringing that big bomb off the bus and that thing gets blown up. Michael Bay had to have a big explosion. It worked. It kept to the spirit of the book.

Mark Tapson: Well, speaking of politics, when you saw Hillary Clinton tell Congress “What difference at this point does it make?” about what happened in Benghazi and why, what did you think about that? What went through your mind and what would you like to say to her maybe if you had the opportunity about that.

Mark Geist: I got to see the whole thing, so I got to actually see it in context, so it wasn’t as raw as it was where the news media, they took that in sound bite and made it how they wanted it.

Mark Tapson: What? The media never does that.

Mark Geist: Yeah, I know. But even then you would think that someone as experienced as Hillary Clinton with dealing with the media, dealing with Congress, would know better than to say those — just saying those words no matter what context you meant them in was disrespectful. And I think me and Tig and Tonto are very close with Tyrone’s mom, with Shawn Smith’s mom, and I think that’s what hurt us the most. I know for me, what angered me the most was the fact that it’s being that disrespectful towards the family members of those that died.

Mark Tapson: Okay, one last political question. I understand that you recently endorsed Donald Trump for president. Publicly, you endorse him. What is it about Donald Trump that earned your support?

Mark Geist: Because they called me up. I got to meet his son, Don Trump Jr., at a hunting convention. Just one of the things that, because I always knew that seeing Donald Trump on the Apprentice, and all of those things. He’s crass. He’s brazen. He’s rude. He’s socially unacceptable at times. He says what’s on his mind and so that’s what I was expecting from his kids. And when I met his son, we were sitting there talking and his little daughter had came up and tugged on his jacket and said, “Hey dad, I want to go buy this,” and he’s like, “Do you have your money?” She’s like, “Yeah.” He says, “Okay, how much is what you’re buying?” And she says it’s about $31.00. He’s like, “How much do you have?” And she’s like, “I got $35.00.” He’s like, “Then that should cover taxes and everything, but before you go buy that, is that really what you want because you are going to be broke after that and you’re going to have to earn your money again.” And the fact that he would use that as a lesson to teach his daughter about how to spend money and do that, he learned that from somebody. He didn’t just come up with that on his own. He learned that from his dad. After I got done with that I started thinking this is probably why he is a billionaire because he knows how to manage his money and he teaches it to his kids and his kids teach it to their kids.

About two, three weeks later they asked me if I would be interested in endorsing Donald Trump. And I’m like, “I’m not going to endorse him unless I get to talk to him. I want to look him in the eyes and see if he’s going to lie to me.” I went out to Las Vegas and I got to meet him and talk with him twice while they were doing the convention or the caucus out there, whatever they were doing, and I sat down with him and talked with him. He’s not the same person when you’re sitting in front of him, talking with him like that because I think when the cameras run, he’s a showman. He knows how to work a room. He knows how to get a response out of people, and that’s what he’s looking to do. It’s smart business. He’s been able to stay in the front of the media without having to spend any money on the media. He didn’t need to pay to get a commercial because they gave him a commercial and how’d he do that. He did it by saying what drew a response from everybody and it was calculated. Just watching him and how he did it, because I got to be around him a good part of that day, and he’s very calculated in everything he does, and I think that’s because he’s a great businessman, and I believe that he’ll put the right people in place. He knows that I think from being a businessman that to be successful you have to have good people underneath you. That you can’t be the only person in the room. Even if you’re going to act like it.

And I think those are the traits that I saw in him that really pushed me into doing that, and the other side of it is I think he’s different. He’s not going to be the same one. The establishment has not stood behind us in the last four years since they’ve taken over and they haven’t stepped up and had the courage to do what’s right, which goes back for me. It’s a personal thing back to Benghazi. We had the fortitude and the courage to do what needed to be done because there were Americans lives in peril, so it’s irrelevant what’s going to happen to us. We went over and we saved their lives. In doing what we did, in defying those stand down orders, there was more than two dozen people that lived that night. Had we not done that or had we not been there, it wouldn’t have been four dead. It would have been 30 dead, And why don’t our politicians have that same courage, that same fortitude, to stand up whether it’s going to mean getting elected or not and doing what’s right? Not doing what’s easiest.

Mark Tapson: I think that’s a good place to stop. Mark, thanks very much.

Mark Geist: Thank you everybody. Thank you very much. (For more from the author of “ONE NIGHT IN BENGHAZI: Mark ‘Oz’ Geist Recounts a Tale of Heroism” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

THANKS, OBAMA! Only Eight Iranian Missile Launches Since Nuke Deal Signed!

First, the Obama administration lied its collective asses off regarding every detail of the Iran nuclear deal, virtually guaranteeing a war or a major terror attack involving the West.

Next, they molded a Gumby-spined media into a propaganda arm of the administration, using payola and low-information journalists to spread their message of horses***.

As a result, in addition to kidnapping U.S. service personnel and humiliating them on global television, Iran has begun aggressively launching missiles in all directions, threatening its neighbors and embarrassing President Mom-pants.

In the 10 months since the Iran nuclear agreement was signed, the Islamic Republic has increased the frequency of its ballistic missile testing, according to researcher Michael Elleman, who testified before a US senatorial committee this week … investigating the effects of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the official name for the Iran nuclear deal signed in July 2015.

Since then, Iran’s ballistic missile program has become a central issue in the debate surrounding the nuclear deal, with opponents of the agreement saying test launches violate the terms of the JCPOA, while proponents argue missile tests are “inconsistent” with United Nations resolutions but not necessarily illegal.

According to the UN decision, “Iran is called upon not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology,” until October 2023.

As they’re only “called upon not to” test missiles, but not expressly forbidden from doing so, Iran has used that loophole to increase its testing with impunity.

When war comes, and it will, let’s all remember to thank Puppet-master Obama, the traitorous Democrat Party, and a complicit media. (For more from the author of “THANKS, OBAMA! Only Eight Iranian Missile Launches Since Nuke Deal Signed!” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

When Christians Turn Against Freedom

Here’s a quick smell test that I use when someone presents me with what he considers a brave and “radical” interpretation of the Gospel: Are this theory’s implications so appalling — not just for me, but the whole human race — that they would make me hope from the depths of my very soul that Christianity isn’t true? Does this reading of the Christian message

So outrage our natural instincts that it makes God seem like a sadistic monster or a bumbling incompetent, who made men fundamentally wrong — and now expects us to torture ourselves to correct his initial mistake?

Suggest that the Fall obliterated from the human heart any inkling of the Good, effectively re-creating the race of man according to Satan’s specifications?

Cut Christianity off completely from Judaism by making nonsense of the Old Testament — suggesting that the Jews of Jesus’ time were justified in rejecting him?

Such theories stink of brimstone. Gnostic attempts to remake Christianity as a hatred of life on earth are not so much real intellectual options as temptations from the devil aimed at the virtue of Faith. And countless saints have warned us to “flee the occasion” of sin. Any version of Christianity that would send a reasonable person on a quest for the nearest synagogue is false.

Using the Brimstone Smell Test

Employing the Smell Test has saved me going down countless blind alleys over the years. It helped me to shrug off the fringe arguments of those who claim that all non-Catholics are doomed to hell, and that for this grim reason we Catholics should seek to reinstate the Inquisition — using totalitarian means if need be to save as many souls as possible from plummeting into the Fire.

The Test helped me quickly reject the idea — which bedeviled some in the early Church — that really every Christian ought to live as a monk or nun, leaving marriage as a quasi-pagan halfway house which the truly devout should reject. (As Lezscek Kolakowski reports, the great Pascal imbibed this idea — and used it to bully his sister into shunning the man whom she loved.)

The same Test helps me know right off the bat what to think of Christians who call for pacifism or open borders.

Today’s Anti-Freedom Christians

I used the Brimstone test again when I read a famous essay by Catholic historian Christopher Dawson, where Dawson (who was born into money and later handed an endowed chair at Harvard) argued that any kind of financial planning, any effort to turn a profit or provide for your children’s future, is profoundly unchristian.

All Christians, even fathers of families, should live as St. Francis did, existing from day to day on whatever tithes come over the transom. Hence business, the free market, banking, insurance, savings, inheritance, and even children’s college funds are all fundamentally evil. Soldiers, noblemen, artists, clergy, kings and even conquistadors make better Christians than businessmen, said Dawson. Since students of mine were using this essay’s argument to justify making irresponsible decisions about their lives, I felt compelled to analyze it and point-by-point refute it. I left not a single stone piled on another.

Dawson’s argument is false but it isn’t dead. In fact, his ideas have found new apostles, in a broad and influential movement among some Christians who reject business, the free market, and indeed freedom itself — as forbidden fruit that fell from the Enlightenment’s poison tree. In such Christian circles you will find sneering references to “Liberalism,” by which the authors don’t mean the ideology of the Democrats. Instead, what they’re rejecting is the worldwide movement for freedom — religious, political and economic — that might be better called “Classical Liberalism.”

It’s a movement America’s Founders imported from England, and its roots reach back through the Magna Carta to the Saxons. This Liberalism is the heritage of the Anglosphere, and its benevolent effects can be seen from India to Australia, from Texas to the Falkland Islands. Pope John Paul II, who had endured the only feasible modern alternative to Classical Liberalism — ideological tyranny — wrote in Memory and Identity that such Liberalism reflects in politics the Christian vision of the person, as a free, responsible being answerable finally only to God.

This broad-based movement of Liberalism was the force behind demands for religious, economic, and political freedom first in England, then in America, and then around the world. This freedom movement was what caught fire in Poland, which brought down the Soviet empire. Such freedom is what persecuted Christians seek in the Middle East, and dissidents call for in China. Our Constitution’s guarantees of this freedom serve in America as the last, fragile bulwark against government repression of Christianity, as we saw the Obama administration attempt against Hobby Lobby and the Little Sisters of the Poor.

And now there are Christians who reject such freedom as incompatible with the Gospel. Elsewhere I have laid out in depressing detail the claims of Catholics who crave a return of the old paternalistic order, which saw priests collude with governments to maintain a religious monopoly, suppressing non-Catholic speech, outlawing Protestant churches and censoring the press. The Church renounced this power, all too belatedly, at Vatican II — but there are Catholics out there who reject the Council’s teaching, or try to get around it by looking for loopholes in the text.

The Free Market Is the Enemy. So Poverty Is Our Friend

More common by far are Christians — and we are seeing them in various denominations now — who skip lightly over the question of whether the state should impose their religious ideas by force. Instead their attention turns, almost obsessively, to the economy. Classical Liberalism includes as its natural by-product a basically free economy, where citizens strive to maximize their economic benefit by adapting what they produce to what others wish to consume — letting the price system coordinate the vast and incomprehensibly complex neural net of human cooperation, instead of handing that power to bureaucrats and “scientific” managers, as the Soviets tried to do.

Most Christians (as I do) favor a safety net designed to protect those who cannot take care of themselves, one constructed with respect for subsidiarity — the principle of protecting the free institutions of civil society, favoring voluntary over coerced charity, and keeping power as decentralized as possible. But there other Christians out there who seem to oppose freedom in principle.

The Latest Attack on Freedom: David Bentley Hart

Most recently, Orthodox theologian David Bentley Hart has used the pages of First Things — which was founded to further the alliance of faithful Christians and Classical Liberals — to preach the gospel of what we might call the “Illiberal Christians.”

Illiberal Christians resent the dynamism, unpredictability, and spontaneity of an economy driven by the free choices of billions of people, without the guidance of wiser souls with advanced humanities or theology degrees. But these thinkers are running out of cudgels with which to beat the free economy.

In past decades, it was perhaps plausible to blame the market economy for failing to serve the interests of the global poor. Cold hard statistics now show that in the past 20 years, economic globalization has lifted more than a billion human beings from the grinding misery of absolute poverty. India, China, South Korea and parts of Africa have moved or are quickly moving out of the grinding cycle of subsistence agriculture and periodic famines.

Of course, it was only the market economy that lifted the population of Western Europe and America from the perennial want and anxiety that characterized most of human existence, between the early 19th and mid-20th centuries — a fact that Deirdre McCloskey celebrates in her eloquent trilogy, written in defense of freedom and the class that historically demanded it: the constantly libeled bourgeoisie. (I have just discovered that trilogy, and am working my way through it — expect more on McCloskey’s fine work in months to come.)

Illiberal Christians know by now that the economic effect of Classical Liberalism and the free economy on the poor is overwhelmingly beneficial. They just don’t care. Since they cannot blame freedom for failures that permitted global poverty, now Illiberals damn it for its success at creating global wealth, which engenders “consumerism.” The market feeds people’s bodies, and thereby endangers their souls. As Hart writes in First Things, the market system cannot

coexist indefinitely with a culture informed by genuine Christian conviction. Even the fact of the system’s necessary reliance on immense private wealth makes it a moral problem from the vantage of the Gospel, for the simple reason that the New Testament treats such wealth not merely as a spiritual danger, and not merely as a blessing that should not be misused, but as an intrinsic evil.

Hart goes on to claim:

In the Sermon on the Plain’s list of beatitudes and woes, he not only tells the poor that the kingdom belongs to them, but explicitly tells the rich that, having had their pleasures in this world, they shall have none in the world to come. He condemns those who buy up properties and create large estates for themselves. You cannot serve both God and mammon.

Is the Old Testament Just … Evil?

The entirety of the Old Testament is predicated upon God promising blessedness, prosperity, happiness and freedom on earth to the Jewish people if they obeyed Him. Christianity teaches us that there is another and higher happiness to found in the next life. But God could never have promised worldly blessings to His people in the first place if they were “intrinsically evil,” as Hart pretends. His rejection of all the this-worldly good things — such as a better life for one’s children — which Jews craved from Abraham onward strikes me as frankly Marcionite, partaking of the heresy which starkly opposes the “wicked” and “unspiritual” Old Testament to the New. Theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar was the first to note the deeply Marcionite, and often frankly anti-Semitic, biases of modern radicals who also — not by accident — rejected the market economy as evil.

We learn from the Gospels and the church’s traditions that we must imitate Christ, Who healed the sick and sought to alleviate worldly suffering. Indeed, the extraordinary and Christ-like work of Christian doctors and nurses, teachers and abolitionists, are all devoted to alleviating suffering. If suffering is in fact spiritually preferable to decent comfort and freedom, then Christians have no business trying our best to stamp it out. We ought to be spreading it. Imagining the highly “spiritual” austerity which Hart prefers to modern prosperity, I cannot help thinking of the program favored by Ingsoc in Orwell’s 1984, which was organized around suppressing pleasure of any kind. If that really were Christianity, then (as Flannery O’Connor said of another heresy) “to hell with it.”

It’s “Consumerist” When Vulgar People Crave Tacky Things

I will yield the field of refuting Hart’s exegesis to the learned Samuel Gregg, who did so comprehensively last week, drawing on Gregg’s fascinating new history of Christian attitudes toward economics and banking, For God and For Profit, which I was privileged to edit for its publisher, Crossroad. There is not much left of Hart’s thesis when Gregg is finished, but don’t count on that to change any minds. Those who find freedom repulsive do so for very deep reasons, which won’t go away when you prove to them that they are misreading the Gospel, any more than the market’s success at uplifting the poor cured them of their resenting it.

What seems to motivate Illiberal thinkers is a visceral aesthetic, pseudo-spiritual disgust at the outcome of freedom, at the fact that given their druthers, ordinary people make vulgar choices — picking Nash-trash music over string quartets, pre-fab suburbs over quirky historic neighborhoods, and shallow spirituality over the Desert Fathers. Such choices distress me, too — as it bothers me when people adopt religious beliefs which I think are false and spiritually harmful.

Don’t Play God. Lucifer Tried It, and See How It Worked Out for Him

But respect for the dignity and autonomy of others, and the realization that God is at work in their consciences every bit as powerfully as in mine, teach me to reject the use of force to train other human beings like recalcitrant pets “for their own good.” As long as ago as 1850, the great Catholic Classical Liberal Frederic Bastiat diagnosed the Olympian pride involved in presuming to engineer human souls (a phrase I borrowed from that famous Illiberal, Stalin). As Bastiat wrote of socialists, so we must now say of Illiberal Christians:

Socialists look upon people as raw material to be formed into social combinations. This is so true that, if by chance, the socialists have any doubts about the success of these combinations, they will demand that a small portion of mankind be set aside to experiment upon….

In the same manner, an inventor makes a model before he constructs the full-sized machine; the chemist wastes some chemicals — the farmer wastes some seeds and land — to try out an idea.

But what a difference there is between the gardener and his trees, between the inventor and his machine, between the chemist and his elements, between the farmer and his seeds! And in all sincerity, the socialist thinks that there is the same difference between him and mankind! … To these intellectuals and writers, the relationship between persons and the legislator appears to be the same as the relationship between the clay and the potter.

One of the greatest works of 19th-century literature, Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov, foresaw the eventual merging of socialist and religious Illiberals, into a single movement that used coercion to suppress the unruly desires of the vulgar, grasping masses, and herd them into orderly, predictable ghettos, walled in by coercion, poverty, superstition and ignorance. That is the “heavenly city” which would result if the Illiberals have their way. The gospel they are preaching belongs not to Jesus Christ, but the Grand Inquisitor. (For more from the author of “When Christians Turn Against Freedom” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Courting Bernie Voters at the Expense of His Principles – Wait, Never Mind

Why are Trump supporters working overtime to get conservatives to vote for Trump when he himself admits he’s really not that into us?

We keep hearing that it’s our job as conservatives to try to get Trump to come around to our side of things, you know, to work to get a seat at the table. Funny, we hear that stuff from people who call themselves conservatives who have already jumped on the Trump train. It’s almost like they left work early to go to the club, and we have to stay behind, finish the dishes and vacuum and reset the entire restaurant.

But hey, we’ve done the responsible thing many times, mostly because our conscience won’t allow us to do otherwise.

But in all the confusion, what with Trump supporters guilting, shaming, and prodding conservatives on Twitter and in the blogosphere, something should be made clear. This presidential race is not between a Republican and a Democrat, nor a conservative and a liberal; it is between two ends of the liberal spectrum. So far, conservatives are split on whether to vote for Trump—one side figures he’s better than Hillary, while the other is struggling with lending credence to his stated policies that are proven to destroy the free market and cause massive economic and diplomatic problems. This is serious stuff that merits real thought. Still though, Trump isn’t really trying to mend fences with conservatives, and that, along with all the abuse conservatives are taking online from his supporters, begs the question, “Why isn’t Trump trying to get our votes?”

Perhaps because Donald Trump is a very different kind of Republican (just ask him), and one would think at least part of the hesitation toward voting for him would be that he is courting Bernie supporters.

Not that it’s a bad thing in itself to court Bernie supporters, but Trump isn’t trying to sell them on any Republican-centric messaging—he is trying to capture them by parroting Bernie. In fact, he told MSNBC, “Bernie Sanders has a message that’s interesting. I’m going to be taking a lot of the things Bernie said and using them.” And so he has.

Last night, Trump had a rally in New Mexico where he talked about Bernie supporters and Bernie himself a lot. As if he has the utmost respect for him, Trump said that Bernie was getting the short end of the stick—just like he himself did—that the system was rigged against him and poor Bernie. The difference is Trump beat the system, and Bernie can’t make good deals. Trump said that he is getting 40 percent of the Bernie supporters, too. For about a month, Trump has been talking a lot about Bernie, including that Bernie is being denied the nomination because he’s telling the truth.

According to People Magazine, 20 percent of Sanders voters will vote Trump, Nate Silver expects they will go to Clinton or sit out, and has numbers that only 15% will vote Trump. Some Democratic strategists believe the Berners will become Trumpers, some think it’ll never happen, and some are pushing to vote for Trump because he’s the empty vessel they can fill up with progressive groupthink.

So knowing that Trump reads all this stuff, it’s clear he believes that the more he offers them a spot, the more Berners will be by his side in November.

Think about this: Bernie is an avowed socialist and Trump and he overlap on trade. Trump has already “pivoted” on raising the minimum wage, and rejected the Citizen’s United case; in fact, the far-left MSNBC made the point that he is wrong on everything except that notorious freedom of speech case, that hinged on banning speech.

The thing is, I’m not sure there is enough Republican identity left for most Republicans who’ve jumped on the train to know why all that would be bad. It’s gotten to the point that nothing he says matters anymore—which used to be why we all marveled at how his supporters weren’t using their heads—but apparently that brain-drain is more catchy than the Zika virus.

It’s bad that Trump seems to want to replace conservative voters with Bernie supporters, because that would mean he will be out there promising socialism to get votes. And it also means, if you have already endorsed the Donald, then you have bought the ticket to ride the socialism rail car where everyone is promised everything and nobody learns anything, as they get nearer and nearer to Utopia which, for some reason, always looks like Siberia. That way, the mindlessness of socialism is reinforced within the Republican Party rather than rebuked.

Yet this relationship between conservatives and the Republican Party is over-the-top dysfunctional. For me, I find myself shaking my head over how great the party could be if it just did what it says it’ll do, champion conservative governance and stand up to the Democrats. But then, when reality hits, I know they’ll never do that… so why do I dream?

It’s bad enough that the same philosophy that founded America can’t seem to get decent treatment by a group of people who claim they can make America great, maybe even better than ever before, as Trump said last night. But it’s worse to know that there is a massive number of people who believe a president is their ruler, and not the other way around, and that the Trump train to Utopia doesn’t want or need conservative influence.

Trump is actively pursuing unity with Paul Ryan (who is far-left on amnesty), the tech industry, GOP insiders, the GOP elite, and Bernie supporters. While his SCOTUS list was supposed to be the reason conservatives would flock to him, the problem that he has abused fellow Republicans won’t go away until he himself buries it. Then there is the fact that much of his record suggests pathological deceit…

While there remains little faith among conservatives in the direction of the Republican Party in the first place, for Trump to want to take it in the direction it is already going without apology isn’t surprising when you consider human nature. But if the destination is America, the train is heading in the opposite direction. Those that climb aboard now when it is unclear where the train is headed are doing so for the wrong reasons, fear being at the top of the list. But they should not feel fear, but grief instead, grief for the sorry mess that was made of things. (For more from the author of “Trump Courting Bernie Voters at the Expense of His Principles – Wait, Never Mind” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

World’s Largest Muslim Organization Admits Extremism Problem Springs From Islamic Teachings

There’s been so much debate as to whether violent extremism—which has triggered numerous terrorist attacks that have claimed thousands of innocent lives—should be attributed to Islam as a religion.

The largest Muslim organisation in the world recently admitted that bad elements of Islam are indeed part of the extremism problem.

During an international meeting of moderate Islamic leaders in Jakarta earlier this month, the Indonesia-based Nahdlatul Ulama group came out with a strong condemnation of their fellow Muslims, particularly extremist groups like the Islamic State (ISIS) and al-Qaeda.

“We are like traditional opposition to supremacist Islamism,” Yahya Staquf, an Indonesia cleric affiliated with the Nahdlatul Ulama, told CNN, as quoted by CBN News.

Staquf openly admitted that to be able to combat the global jihadi movement, world leaders and the general public must recognize the fact that extremism originates from Islamic teachings, which are being used by terrorist groups to justify the use of violence. (Read more from “World’s Largest Muslim Organization Admits Extremism Problem Springs From Islamic Teachings” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

U.S. Sees First Case of Bacteria Resistant to All Antibiotics

U.S. health officials on Thursday reported the first case in the country of a patient with an infection resistant to all known antibiotics, and expressed grave concern that the superbug could pose serious danger for routine infections if it spreads.

“We risk being in a post-antibiotic world,” said Thomas Frieden, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, referring to the urinary tract infection of a 49-year-old Pennsylvania woman who had not travelled within the prior five months.

Frieden, speaking at a National Press Club luncheon in Washington, D.C., said the infection was not controlled even by colistin, an antibiotic that is reserved for use against “nightmare bacteria.”

The infection was reported Thursday in a study appearing in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, a publication of the American Society for Microbiology. It said the superbug itself had first been infected with a tiny piece of DNA called a plasmid, which passed along a gene called mcr-1 that confers resistance to colistin.

“(This) heralds the emergence of truly pan-drug resistant bacteria,” said the study, which was conducted by the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. “To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of mcr-1 in the USA.” (Read more from “U.S. Sees First Case of Bacteria Resistant to All Antibiotics” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Two-Thirds of Babies Born at 22 and 23 Weeks of Gestation Survive If Given Care

Babies born at 22 weeks and 23 weeks of gestation are likely to survive if given proper care, according to a new study of infants born at a German hospital. 25 percent “born at the border of viability and offered active care survived without severe complications.” The study appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics.

The University of Cologne Medical Center’s study, which looked at babies born from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014, found that 67 percent of these babies who were given “active pre-natal and postnatal care” were discharged from the hospital alive. Out of 106 babies born at 22 or 23 weeks, 86 received that kind of care and 58 survived to be discharged.

“The survival rate was 61% (17 of 28) for infants born at 22 weeks of gestation and 71% (41 of 58) for infants born at 23 weeks of gestation,” according to the online abstract for the study. Half of the babies who died died from respiratory failure and one-quarter from multiorgan failure. Others suffered from severe complications.

The study’s publication came shortly after a 21-week old unborn child was left to die at an abortion clinic in Arizona. In a statement, Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser tied the study’s results to her organization’s support for a ban on abortions after 20 weeks’ gestation as well as the Born Alive Protection Act. The latter would require doctors to give proper medical care to babies who survive abortions.

The recorded 911 call made from the Arizona clinic showed that the child was not given care that would have helped it survive. According to Dannenfelser, the baby “suffered, awaiting medical care the abortion clinic was incapable of providing.”

SBA spokesperson Mallory Quigley told The Stream that the German study shows the survivability of extremely premature babies is “approaching what the survival rates would be for babies born later in pregnancy.” (For more from the author of “Two-Thirds of Babies Born at 22 and 23 Weeks of Gestation Survive If Given Care” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

State Department Inspector General Releases Scathing Report on Hillary Clinton

The State Department’s inspector general has determined that Hillary Clinton did not comply with the agency’s record policies, singling out her use of a private, unsecured email server for particular scrutiny. The IG further revealed that Clinton and her aides refused to participate in the review.

The independent watchdog’s 83-page report to lawmakers noted one of the major failures of the former secretary of state was not turning over her emails when she left office, as required by law. “Therefore, Secretary Clinton should have preserved any Federal records she created and received on her personal account by printing and filing those records with the related files in the Office of the Secretary,” the report states.

“At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she did not comply with the Department’s policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act,” it adds.

“In December 2014, nearly two years after leaving office, she turned over more than 30,000 emails she said represented all of her work related correspondence. She said she also exchanged about 31,000 personal emails during her time as secretary and those notes have been deleted,” The Washington Post reported.

While current Secretary of State John Kerry and former secretaries Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice all cooperated with the review, Clinton and her former State Department aides Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan and Huma Abedin all declined to do so.

The IG review is separate from the FBI investigation into whether Clinton’s use of a private, unsecured server violated the law regarding the handling of classified information.

As reported by Western Journalism, more than 2,000 Clinton emails were found to contain classified information, including 22 designated “top secret” and too damaging to be released to the public, even now.

When the story broke of Clinton’s use of an unsecured server last spring, she told reporters “no classified material” was on it. Later in the summer, she said it contained none that was “classified at the time.” In late January, she stated no information had been “marked classified.”

The report comes at a difficult time for Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, as she has seen her lead in the polls against presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump vanish. Her lack of honesty and trustworthiness is one of the main factors identified by poll respondents who hold a negative view of her candidacy. (For more from the author of “State Department Inspector General Releases Scathing Report on Hillary Clinton” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Kasich Makes Announcement About Trump Endorsement

If Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump wants Ohio Gov. John Kasich’s endorsement, the presumptive GOP nominee will have to make some changes.

“Think of it as a merger of two companies,” Kasich said in an interview Tuesday with Ohio reporters. “If the values are not somewhat similar, if the culture is not somewhat similar, it’s pretty hard to do a merger.”

Kasich, who in the past has said he may never get to the point where he would back Trump, later elaborated, noting his dislike for the way Trump will “run people into the ditch.”

“Unless I see a fundamental change in that approach, it’s really hard for me to do a merger,” he said. “If he changes, that’s a whole new ballgame. But if the cultures don’t change, mergers aren’t possible.”

During the interview session, Kasich, who suspended his presidential campaign after the Indiana primary, contrasted his approach with that of Trump, saying the billionaire made Americans out as victims without offering solutions.

“It’s easier to consider yourself a victim than it is to stand against the wind, particularly when you have people telling you it’s not your fault,” Kasich said. “And it wasn’t their fault. But when you create a scapegoat situation – ‘Well, the reason why you don’t have something is because someone else does’ – that is a message at this point in time that is more effective than, ‘Hey, we can work our way through this.’”

Kasich said he will write a book on his campaign experiences and use it to share his optimistic message of where the nation should go.

“It’s my message, and I don’t really think so much about how it fits into the Republican Party,” Kasich said. “I think people intuitively know that message is correct. But there’s a tug-of-war going on, I believe, in the country right now between people who are legitimately upset for a variety of reasons. Their concerns, fears, insecurities have to be acknowledged. The question is, do you stand against the wind and make the best out of what you have in life? Or do you go and become a victim?” (For more from the author of “Kasich Makes Announcement About Trump Endorsement” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.