One Charge Against a Pro-Life Planned Parenthood Videomaker Dropped

In what David Daleiden’s lawyers are calling a “huge win for the pro-life movement” one charge against the undercover Planned Parenthood video producer has been dropped.

Daleiden is the producer of the Center for Medical Progress videos exposing Planned Parenthood’s illegal sale of baby body parts.

Pro-life advocates had expected that an investigation into Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast in Houston would result in criminal action against the abortion provider, and were shocked when Daleiden and his colleague Sandra Merritt were indicted instead.

But now, a judge has ruled in favor of Daeiden by dropping the Class A misdemeanor charge for prohibition of the purchase and sale of human organs.

Breitbart News reports:

The judge ruled that the court does not have jurisdiction over the case. The judge ruled for Daleiden as a matter of law. Daleiden lawyer Jared Woodfill told Breitbart Texas, “This is a huge win for the pro-life movement. The charges brought by Harris County District Attorney Devon Anderson were spurious at best.”

Daleiden’s other lawyer, Terry Yates, told Breitbart Texas, “I think the judge’s ruling is very sound. She came to her conclusion before addressing the arguments in the motions to quash the indictment.” He said there was many good legal reasons for dismissing the charges laid out in their motions.

Daleiden and Merritt are still fighting a felony charge for tampering with a government record and a misdemeanor charge for offering to buy fetal tissue. (For more from the author of “One Charge Against a Pro-Life Planned Parenthood Videomaker Dropped” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

You’ll Never Guess the Ridiculous Reason This Daily News Reporter Says He Has PTSD

Just a day after a radical Islamic terrorist took the lives of 49 Americans at a nightclub in Orlando, Gersh Kuntzman of the New York Daily News decided he was going to put his best liberal bias to task and show why AR-15’s are “horrifying, dangerous and very very loud.”

Kuntzman couldn’t fathom why anyone would ever want to own one of these “military style assault weapons,” so he traveled to a gun shop in Philadelphia and did what so many Americans have the right to do in their spare time: he shot a firearm in a safe setting, just for the fun of it. The results were highly entertaining:

“The recoil bruised my shoulder. The brass shell casing disoriented me as they flew past my face … The explosions — loud like a bomb — gave me a temporary case of PTSD … I was anxious and irritable,” Kuntzman journals of his poor little traumatized emotions!

O.M.G. L.O.L. Please excuse me while I compose myself …

Ok Mr. Kuntzman, time to grow some balls.

I’m a 135 lb. female and have absolutely zero fear of firing an AR-15. And. I can tell you, without a doubt, it does NOT sound like a cannon, nor does it feel like a bazooka.

In fact, I’ve been using firearms since I was 6 years old when my dad put a double barrel shotgun in my hands and taught me to properly fire it. It’s amazing how not terrifying something is when you’re taught to have a healthy respect of it.

These little girls don’t seem to have a problem firing their AR-15’s either:

And to be sure you know I’m not being sexist, here are two little boys who didn’t seem to have a problem firing AR-15’s:

As Erick Erickson notes, Kuntzman’s attempt at reporting is full of fabrications, fact distortions and flat-out overheated false narratives.

One last thing to note in this ridiculous garbage the Daily News calls “reporting,” the terrorist did not even use an AR-15. Why does the Left insist on using this terrorist attack to take away law abiding citizens’ ability to own these firearms?

So Mr. Kuntzman, in addition to revoking your man card, I’d like to also revoke your ethical journalist card. (For more from the author of “You’ll Never Guess the Ridiculous Reason This Daily News Reporter Says He Has PTSD” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

The Orlando Massacre Is Just the Beginning

What is the greatest lesson of the Orlando massacre, where a Muslim shooter killed at least 50 people at a homosexual night club—an event that is now considered the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil since the September 11 attacks of 2001? It’s that such an attack had to happen—and is destined to happen again. Why? Because the surest way of seeing an act occur repeatedly—say a terrorist attack—is to repeat all the same steps that precipitated and paved the way for it in the first place.

Consider: the shooter, Omar Mir Seddique Mateen, was “quite religious” and a pious Muslim (he attended mosque and prayed regularly); he clearly saw himself as a jihadi killing evildoers—he “recited prayers to Allah during the attack,” pledged this act to the Islamic State, and the latter claimed it—officialdom, as usual, is trying to obfuscate the Islamic role.

Despite all of the above and the fact that ISIS has repeatedly executed homosexuals, often videotaping it (see here), “FBI Special Agent Ron Hopper said the bureau was still working to determine whether sexual orientation was a motive in the Orlando attack.”

President Obama said what he often says after a Muslim goes on a rampage in the name of Islam: it’s still too early to know the “precise motivations of the killer.” Instead, Obama exploited the jihadi massacre as a springboard for his own gun-ban agenda, saying that access to “very powerful weapons very quickly” is “a problem regardless of their motivations.”

Still others are going as far as to blame this jihadi attack on American Christians and conservatives: “You know what is gross — your thoughts and prayers and Islamophobia after you created this anti-queer climate,” ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio tweeted.

Then there’s the deliberate incompetence: Obama’s own purge of training materials and language deemed “hurtful” to Muslims is being cited as partially responsible for the FBI dropping the ball—so that the FBI would never “ever have guessed a LGBT club [would] be a target of an terrorist attack” Mateen was even on the FBI’s radar as a “person of interest” in 2013 and 2014—yet was free to buy guns and go on a murderous rampage in 2016.

Indeed, in this case at least, it appears that Islamophobia trumped homophobia: “Gilroy, a former Fort Pierce police officer, said Mateen frequently made homophobic and racial comments. Gilroy said he complained to his employer several times but it did nothing because he was Muslim.”

Finally, as with every Islamic terror attack on U.S. soil, the media is again warning against that notorious wave of “reprisals” against the Muslim community that never manifests. Florida officials were quick to invite a Muslim cleric to address the media and “preempt a possible backlash against the Muslim community” (as opposed to the other Muslim cleric who openly taught in Orlando that Islam commands the execution of homosexuals). The Guardian “courageously” proclaimed, “Let’s not give in to fear after the Orlando shooting.”

Similarly, the head of the Jewish LGBTQ group, who expressed fears of a backlash against Muslims, redundantly pointed out that “We should remember not to blame all members of any other religion or political ideology for what one person does”—an admonition that fails to address who or what we should blame when countless upon countless members of one religion constantly and always engage in violent behavior.

To the careful observer, all of these reactions from liberals, leftist media, and the Obama administration are par for the course whenever a jihadi terror attack occurs on American soil: stout denial of any connection between the attack in question and Islamic teachings; cynically exploiting the attack to demonize conservatives, gun advocates, and “homophobic” Christians; and cries that any scrutiny into Islam is tantamount to a “backlash” against Muslims.

And it’s because all these reactions are standard that many more Islamic terrorist attacks are destined to occur on American soil. (For more from the author of “The Orlando Massacre Is Just the Beginning” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Hillary’s Fallen Down Laughing and She Can’t Get Up

This here is some weapons-grade stupidity:

160614-hillary-fbi-investigation

Of course, being under a criminal FBI investigation apparently isn’t disqualifying for a presidential candidate. As long as said miscreant is a Democorat [sic intentional]. (For more from the author of “Hillary’s Fallen Down Laughing and She Can’t Get Up” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

US Being Destroyed by a Global Conspiracy: The Marriage of Convenience Between the Left and Radical Islam

In order to lessen the likelihood of terrorist attacks like Orlando, San Bernardino and the Boston Marathon and eliminate radical Islam as an existential threat to the United States, we must, first and foremost, defeat the prevailing Islamo-Marxist ideology within our own government and the willing accomplices who sustain it by willful blindness to the danger we face.

If you are still asking the question: how can Orlando happen?

Ask no more.

Stated simply, it is a sad truth that there are people in national leadership positions, who don’t want America to win or who don’t care much if we lose, as long as they can somehow preserve their own personal power and profit.

It is not a question of politics. It is an issue of patriotism.

The United States faces an assault by a global conspiracy, a marriage of convenience between two totalitarian ideologies, radical Islam and the political left. They have been brought together by the traits they share; their hatred of Western civilization and a commitment to the destruction of capitalistic, Judeo-Christian-based democracy.

In part, Orlando happens because the federal government practices Sharia, deliberately downplaying the menace of radical Islam and intentionally stripping law enforcement of its ability to directly counter the threat.

Kerry Picket of the Daily Caller asks: could the FBI’s purge of training material relating to Islamic terrorism have led to the agency dropping the ball on Florida nightclub shooter Omar Mateen?

The FBI’s training on handling possible Islamic terror suspects was turned upside down five years ago, when the Obama administration began a purge of training material that would remove references to Islam that Muslim subject matter experts, hired by the Justice Department, found offensive.

It is also fair question to ask, whether the conditions for and the handling of the Orlando attack were affected by the Obama Administration’s relentless attacks on the nation’s police officers and criminal-justice system, routinely and repeatedly charging that cops and the courts are awash in racial bias and Islamophobia?

The Islamic terrorist and registered Democrat Mateen was a US citizen of Afghan decent, who pledged his allegiance to ISIS and between 2011 and 2012 traveled to Saudi Arabia for Umrah, a Muslim religious pilgrimage. He was investigated by the FBI in 2013 and 2014 for inflammatory statements and his link to Moner Mohammad Abu Salha, an American radical who traveled to Syria and committed a suicide bombing.

Yet, according to recent reports, Mateen was a repeat visitor at Orlando gay nightclub before his killing spree, occasionally got drunk, may have been gay and used the gay dating and chat application Jack’d.

In the apple not falling far from the tree department, Seddique Mir Mateen, the father of the mass murderer, is a supporter of the Afghan Taliban with his own internet program, where he made radical anti-LGBT statements.

Was the murderer Mateen’s motive religious or political or both? Does it matter? I don’t think so.

In part, Orlando happens because radical Islam thinks it is winning. How many ISIS recruits would there be if they were doing the dying instead of us?

Practically speaking, the religious extremism and brutality of ISIS is not unlike that of Nazi Germany or Imperial Japan.

At the onset of World War II, the ordinary American Marine and soldier were unprepared for the fanaticism and cruelty of the Japanese Army.

Eugene B. Sledge, in his celebrated memoir “With the Old Breed: At Peleliu and Okinawa,” describes one instance in which he and a comrade came across the mutilated bodies of three Marines, butchered with severed genitals stuffed into their mouths.

An ideology is a system of ideas, but ideas don’t kill people, Islamists kill people.

You may not be able to eradicate an ideology, but you can certainly exterminate those who violently wield that ideology against you.

Like Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, the ideology of radical Islam has little chance to thrive, if there are few left eager to practice it.

It also obviates the need for winning any hearts and minds. (For more from the author of “US Being Destroyed by a Global Conspiracy: The Marriage of Convenience Between the Left and Radical Islam” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Ex-Wife Says Orlando Shooter Was Gay, FBI Told Her to Keep Quiet About His Sexual Orientation

The ex-wife of Orlando mass killer Omar Mateen claimed Monday that she believed he was homosexual — as it was revealed that he frequented the gay nightclub where he staged the nation’s worst massacre in modern times.

Sitora Yusufiy, who was married to Mateen in 2009 for three months, made the shocking claim on Brazilian television station SBT Brazil.

Her fiancé, Marco Dias, speaking in Portuguese on her behalf, said Yusufiy believed that Mateen had “gay tendencies” and that his father had called him gay in front of her. Dias also claimed “the FBI asked her not to tell this to the American media.”

The bombshell came as a male former classmate of Omar Mateen said he had been asked out romantically by the mass killer, who reportedly was a virtual regular at the Pulse nightclub, having visited it more than a dozen times over the years. (Read more from “Ex-Wife Says Orlando Shooter Was Gay, FBI Told Her to Keep Quiet About His Sexual Orientation” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Meet Warren Davidson, the Man Who Took John Boehner’s Seat

Standing in former Speaker John Boehner’s empty and cavernous Longworth office, Ohio’s newest congressman seems out of place. Maybe that’s because Warren Davidson is more of a business and military man than a politician.

Before being sworn in last week, Davidson made a career parachuting from airplanes as an Army Ranger, then filing patents as a manufacturing entrepreneur. Other than a short stint as a township trustee, he’s never held elected office until now.

But what Davidson lacks in political acumen, he’s confident he can replace with leadership experience. His operating doctrine is simple, he tells The Daily Signal: “Fight the war you’re in, not the one you wish you were in. Pay attention to the situation and read it.”

So far, it’s worked out for the rookie legislator.

National Battlelines

Normally, special congressional elections don’t drive national headlines. But the fight for Ohio’s 8th District carried special significance, pitting establishment and conservative groups in a proxy battle for Boehner’s old seat.

Though it’s just one seat out of 435 in the House, Davidson’s subsequent June 7 victory represents an expansion of the conservative congressional beachhead.

“It’s huge,” Ken Cuccinelli, former Virginia attorney general and president of the Senate Conservative Fund, says of Davidson’s win.“It was historic for [Rep.] Mark Meadows, R-N.C., to courageously knock John Boehner out,” Cuccinelli tells The Daily Signal, “but it is a true sea change to replace him with a true conservative.”

The Freedom Caucus first came to prominence when it unseated Boehner. Meadows spearheaded that offensive when he presented a motion to vacate the chair, a parliamentary procedure that hadn’t been used in over a century.

To take the seat that Boehner left, Davidson first won the Republican primary in March by beating out 14 more established candidates, including a state senator, a state representative, and a wealthy businessman.

He focused his early efforts on the ground game, rallying grassroots organizers to knock on doors, pass out fliers, and get out the vote. And for expert advice, Davidson looked outside Washington’s traditional consulting sphere, signing Jamestown Associates—the conservative firm blacklisted by party brass and the National Republican Congressional Committee.

“Warren worked hard, really hard,” Barney Keller, executive vice president of Jamestown Associates, tells The Daily Signal. “He had a very energized volunteer base, and he had a compelling message—that he was going to change Washington.”

The local race quickly became a national contest with dueling political organizations flying into the 8th District’s airspace and blitzing the market with millions of dollars worth of television, radio, and digital ads.

Ultimately, a combination of grassroots energy, outside spending, and timing handed Davidson the win. In less than six months, the political amateur would go from last to first, winning both the March primary by eight points and the June special election by 77 points.

Humble in Victory

“The big schism was between the establishment politicians versus outsiders,” explains Mack Mariani, chairman of the Political Science Department of Xavier University. “And this is an outsider year. Had Boehner left four, six, or eight years ago, we probably would be looking at a sitting state legislator who would’ve stepped into the seat.”

That energy was on full display Wednesday night. More than a hundred supporters made the eight-hour drive from the eastern side of Ohio to Washington, crowding into Davidson’s new office to cheer him on before he took the official oath of office the next day.

Groups that cheered when Boehner stepped down from office in October were ecstatic that a conservative captured his seat this year.

But Davidson didn’t take any shots at the outgoing speaker during the campaign and he wouldn’t take any the day after he took office. In fact, the man who held the seat for almost 25 years doesn’t seem to weigh on Davidson’s mind much at all.

A Boehner aide tells The Daily Signal that the pair traded phone calls but not much else.

Turns out, the pair doesn’t have much to talk about. “I’m a nonsmoker,” Davidson quips when asked how he compares with his predecessor. “I was on a golf team once but I don’t golf much… And yeah, I’m definitely less tan.”

Between sips of coffee in his empty office, Davidson confirms that he last spoke to his predecessor when Boehner congratulated him after his primary win. But after just a day in his position, Davidson already seems to bristle at repeated questions about Boehner.

During the campaign, Boehner was helpful “in the sense that he wasn’t working hard to get someone else elected,” Davidson tells The Daily Signal. “I’ll say, too, he was very gracious despite the national narrative—people seem incredibly interested in what lunch table I’ll sit at. It’s a little bit like junior high, frankly.”

Little Patience for Drama

Still, Davidson’s first week in the nation’s capital already has been marked with palace intrigue.

Davidson made headlines when he accepted an invitation to join the House Freedom Caucus, the group of hard-liners who drove Boehner from Congress. But the freshman’s decision wasn’t surprising. Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, endorsed Davidson in January, and the fundraising arm of the caucus spent nearly $43,000 to get him elected.

In less than two years, Freedom Caucus members have toppled Speaker Boehner and his longtime second, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va. With Davidson’s addition, their ranks swell to around 40 members.

Rep. Dave Brat, R-Va., sees the Davidson victory as evidence “the Republican brand has to move in our direction.” Brat, who canned Cantor in the 2014 primary, said the caucus expects another “four or five new recruits” after the November election.

Connection to the Freedom Caucus so far hasn’t affected Davidson’s relationship with Boehner’s successor, Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis. Ryan praised the newest Ohio representative as “a strong conservative leader” shortly after his victory, adding that he “looks forward to working with you to get our country back on track.”

Direct and to the point, though, Davidson doesn’t make much of the political drama that punctuates Capitol Hill. “I started out life as a grunt, I was an infantry guy,” he explains, “and I just figure things out along the way.”

From Bootcamp to Capitol Hill

After graduating from high school in 1990, Davidson went straight into the Army. And after basic training, he went to Germany as a member of a mechanized infantry unit. There, he witnessed the fall of the Berlin Wall, excelled in his unit, and earned a commission to West Point—a rare opportunity for enlisted soldiers.

As an officer, Davidson would serve in some of the Army’s most elite and prestigious units, including the Old Guard, the 75th Ranger Regiment, and the 101st Airborne Division.

During that time, Davidson didn’t pay close attention to politics, except when congressional inaction directly interfered with his military mission. When preparing an airborne unit to deploy to Kosovo, Davidson says, a fight over the budget left his soldiers unprepared.

“We wanted to train the machine gunners on live fire to get them ready to deploy,” Davidson remembers. But because of a lack of funding, “we had 18 rounds of ammo per machine gun, which is nothing.”

Instead, the officers “just trained fewer people,” he says, shaking his head, “we weren’t as combat ready as we should’ve been.”

Growing frustration with Washington’s lack of leadership eventually prompted Davidson to end his career in the Army after almost a decade of service.“That’s the real reason I got out,” he says. “I felt like we didn’t know who we wanted to be after we won the Cold War.”

Davidson returned to Ohio to help run his father’s business, a small manufacturing company in Troy. He modernized the firm, grew the workforce from 20 to about 200, and didn’t think much about national politics.

The staunch conservative credits former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for sparking his interest in politics. Davidson remembers watching the congressional investigation of the September 2012 Benghazi attacks, which left four Americans dead.

“You don’t have to be a former Army Ranger to hear the words ‘what difference does it make’ and have your blood boil,” Davidson says, referring to Clinton’s January 2013 remark before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

‘Active Duty’ Again

When Boehner’s seat came open, he decided to run after reaching out to “the person who pinned Clinton to the wall best” during the House side of the investigation: Jordan, a member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which questioned Clinton.

As a soldier, Davidson has endured some of the most intense training the U.S. military provides. But in Washington, the new statesman didn’t receive any orientation, just half-a-dozen thick binders on parliamentary procedure.

“It’s like drinking from a firehouse,” Davidson tells The Daily Signal. But even though he’s a political novice, the Army veteran says he’s undaunted. He tells supporters that the new job feels “like going back to active duty.”

Davidson says he plans on linking his military experience to his new political duties. While the tactics differ, the mission remains the same. “It’s a different sort of animal but it’s essentially the same oath,” he explains, before reciting the civilian version of the military oath of office:

To solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic … well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

Davidson will have a short deployment in Washington to make good on that oath. He’s up for reelection this November.

In the long run, Davidson is gunning for a spot on the Armed Services Committee. But he’s not waiting around for one to open up. He says he already has his first piece of legislation ready to go, a bill requiring Congress to use the same health care given to veterans.

It’s not a punishment for Congress, he explains, but “an alignment of interests” between politicians and members of the military.

“It says to every veteran, ‘We’re willing to be in it with you. We’ll have the same quality of care. We’re not going to ask you to do something we wouldn’t do.’ That’s an important thing for leadership.

Expanding Conservative Beachhead

While Davidson settles down to his new legislative post, conservatives have started recounting their political laurels.

For David McIntosh, president of the Club for Growth, Davidson’s victory serves as a shot across leadership’s bow.“It should mainly serve as a warning to the broad Republican conference and the current leadership,” McIntosh, himself a former Indiana congressman, tells The Daily Signal.

“If you return to the days of Boehner and Cantor,” he says, then GOP brass is entering “politically dangerous waters.”

For now, that’s not on Davidson’s radar.

Instead, the Ohio freshman remains focused on recruiting staff to fill his empty office and learning the legislative process. “I’m still getting my feet wet,” he explains, adding that he’s anxious “to just do the work.” (For more from the author of “Meet Warren Davidson, the Man Who Took John Boehner’s Seat” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

FBI Terror Watch List Can Have Little Impact, Experts Say

Being on the FBI’s terror watch list doesn’t necessarily have a direct impact on an individual, experts say. This is why the Islamist-inspired gunman who murdered 49 people in Orlando was still able to purchase a firearm and work for one of the nation’s largest security firms.

The FBI twice investigated Omar Mateen, the Orlando mass murderer who pledged allegiance to the Islamic State, but authorities say he doesn’t appear to have been directed by the Sunni militant group. The FBI won’t confirm whether Mateen was on the list.

If he was on a list, it likely would have been the Terrorist Screening Database, or TSDB, which is for domestic and foreign individuals reasonably believed to be involved in terrorism. This is typically referred to as the terrorist watch list. Broadly, being on the list may have few consequences, but being on a subset of the list could have significant ramifications.

“The Terrorist Screening Center does not publicly confirm nor deny whether any individual may be included in the U.S. Government’s Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB) or a subset list,” FBI Terrorist Screening Center spokesman Dave Joly said in an email to The Daily Signal. “Disclosure of an individual’s inclusion or non-inclusion in the TSDB or on the No-Fly List would significantly impair the government’s ability to investigate and counteract terrorism, and protect transportation security.”

Mateen was previously on the terror watch list, but was later taken off the list, the Los Angeles Times reported. The newspaper reported that remaining on the list would not have stopped him from buying a gun.

Joly sent a later message explaining, “an individual’s presence in the Terrorist Screening Database, in and of itself, is not a disqualifying factor pursuant to the Brady Act.”

An example of these subsets is the “Known and Suspected Terrorist,” also know as the KST file. Someone on this file would be flagged on the National Instant Criminal Background Check system when trying to purchase a firearm, said David Inserra, a policy analyst for homeland security and cyber policy for The Heritage Foundation. If a name were flagged, it would trigger an investigation, as anyone on the “known or suspected terrorist” file would be prohibited from buying a gun or explosives.

A widely known subset of the terror watch list is the “No-Fly List.”

“The criteria for the list is there has to be enough evidence for intelligence to raise a red flag,” Inserra told The Daily Signal. “An individual has to be nominated to the terrorist watch list. The No-Fly List has substantial criteria, above and beyond the TSDB.”

The specific criteria are confidential. According to the FBI, the “reasonable suspicion” standard must be based on credible information and intelligence by law enforcement, homeland security, and intelligence community agencies, as well as U.S. embassies and consulates, that an individual “knowingly engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to terrorism or terrorist activities.” The National Counterterrorism Center reviews the information gathered.

The State Department, the Defense Department, the Transportation and Security Administration, the FBI’s National Crime Information Center, and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection are the five federal agencies that screen the terror watch list.

Mateen reportedly purchased a gun in the last two weeks. He also worked as a security officer at G4S Secure Solutions since 2007.

“It is a fairly high bar for restricting constitutional rights and rightly so,” said Jim Hanson, executive vice president of the Center for Security Policy, a national security think tank. “When you query a database, it’s more about connecting the dots than about stopping people.”

The watch list can seem ineffective, said Bill Roggio, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, an organization that conducts research on terrorism, noting that the culprits in the Boston Marathon bombing were also reportedly on the list.

“We don’t know all of what has been averted, but in this case the list clearly failed,” Roggio told The Daily Signal. “These lists can only do so much without trampling on constitutional rights. But at some point, as this happens more, people are going to ask what good are these lists if we are not protected?” (For more from the author of “FBI Terror Watch List Can Have Little Impact, Experts Say” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Here’s the Left’s ‘Official Lie’ About the Orlando Terrorist Attack

Reacting Monday to the ISIS-inspired terrorist attack in Orlando, Mark Steyn—filling in for Rush Limbaugh—said that the “official lie” of the Left is that gun-toting “right” wing extremists are responsible for the shooting and radical Islamic terrorism is not.

The fact, Steyn said, is a radical Muslim killed 49 in a terror attack and the Left doesn’t know how to cope with the “internal contradictions of the rainbow coalition.”

Listen:

Steyn read the American headlines reporting the event which showed a stark contrast with international headlines by reporting a deadly “mass shooting” instead of an ISIS-inspired “terror attack.”

While the Left is clamoring for more gun control and screaming at the NRA, it is ignoring that radical Islam is responsible for the attack and only wants to destroy what the Left believes in. “The arithmetic isn’t complicated,” Steyn explained, “the more Islam, the fewer gays.” (For more from the author of “Here’s the Left’s ‘Official Lie’ About the Orlando Terrorist Attack” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Huckabee Tells Romney Republicans to Start Focusing on Beating Clinton

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee kept it simple Friday night when asked about the continuing opposition of 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney to Donald Trump, the party’s 2016 standard bearer.

“I think these guys are spiraling into utter irrelevance,” he said of Fox News’ The Kelly File. “I like Mitt, but he’s trying to divide the party at a time when we need to unite.”

On Friday, Romney attacked Trump once again, saying he would never vote for the billionaire but also making it clear he would not run in a third-party effort to deny Trump the White House.

Romney, who launched the GOP’s #NeverTrump movement three months ago, attacked Trump over the candidate’s criticism of the judge hearing the Trump University lawsuit, and accused Trump of inciting racism.

Trump replied to Romney’s latest comment by repeating his past criticism of Romney’s 2012 campaign.

On The Kelly File Friday night, guest host Trish Regan asked Huckabee why it was that Romney opposed Trump, but did not run against him.

“Good question. I mean I think that’s it. If you don’t like the product that’s on the shelf, say, ‘Let me put my product out there,’” Huckabee said. “I did that. I ran. I was rejected. Sixteen of us were told, ‘No thank you.’ I accept that. I’m not sitting around being bitter.”

Huckabee then cut to the core of the issue.

“Get behind him. We’re Republicans. We don’t want Hillary Clinton. It’s that simple,” Huckabee said. (For more from the author of “Huckabee Tells Romney Republicans to Start Focusing on Beating Clinton” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.