Another Massive US Sex Trafficking Bust Ensnares Over 1,000, Includes Cops, Clergy; 2 Alleged Molesters Caught on Plane

By Claire Bernish. From Seattle to Tuscaloosa, police arrested more than 1,000 people in just one month — including a law enforcement officer and pastor — as part of a sweeping crackdown on child sex offenders, and juvenile and adult sex trafficking in the United States. (Editor’s note: for the story on the two alleged molesters who were caught on a Southwest Airlines flight, scroll to the bottom)

Police from 37 departments in 17 states participated in the annual National Johns Suppression Initiative — a regular effort to ostensibly crack down on human trafficking and illegal sex work — rescuing 81 adult and child victims and arresting 1,020 people from Seattle to Chicago, and Texas to Tuscaloosa in the month-long effort spearheaded by Cook County, Illinois, Sheriff Thomas J. Dart.

Harris County, Texas, saw the largest number of people arrested, 170, while police in Seattle nabbed 160 alleged perpetrators and authorities throughout Cook County, seat of Chicago, arrested 141.

“Three brothels were shut down in Cook County by the sheriff’s office and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the sheriff’s office said. Three people were charged with operating brothels and four others were charged with patronizing them. Six adult victims were offered help,” CBS News reports.

Meanwhile, CNN reports,

In Arizona, officials said more than 400 people were discouraged from buying sex when they received texts, calls or Web browser redirects informing them about the impact of the illegal sex industry.

Dart announced Thursday that his office will begin efforts to create a public database that lists sex buyers who are caught for a second or subsequent time.

Reports say more than 8,000 people have been arrested during the National Johns Suppression Initiative — just since 2011 — as the project continues taking aim at human trafficking and prostitution by arresting patrons, johns, pimps, and other sex offenders, while finding victims the assistance they may need.

On the surface, the news of more than 1,000 arrests sounds productive, if not sorely needed; but, scratch the gilding from this supposed payoff, and controversy — particularly that surrounding what many now view as an anachronistic view of sex work — bubbles furiously to the top.

As Elizabeth Nolan Brown pointed out sardonically for Reason, following a previous johns bust in 2015,

These coordinated efforts to entrap people around the country lead to large initial arrest-counts, ensuring them prominent placement in U.S. media. But few outlets ask questions about specific charges, merely accepting police PR that these were predators arrested and not largely adult men and women trying to have consensual sex. Nor do many folks follow up on the results of these stings. If they did, it would become clear that the ‘National John Suppression Initiative’ has naught to do with stopping sexual exploitation of minors.

Charlotte Alter, who accompanied police during stings for the initiative in Cook County for TIME Magazine, notes, “some human rights organizations, most recently Amnesty International, advocate for the decriminalization of all aspects of sex work, including buying sex.”

Indeed, the International watchdog organization published its policy on protection of the world’s sex workers in 2015. Reiterating the contents of that policy in May last year, Amnesty wrote,

The policy makes several calls on governments including for them to ensure protection from harm, exploitation and coercion; the participation of sex workers in the development of laws that affect their lives and safety; an end to discrimination and access to education and employment options for all.

It recommends the decriminalization of consensual sex work, including those laws that prohibit associated activities—such as bans on buying, solicitation and general organization of sex work. This is based on evidence that these laws often make sex workers less safe and provide impunity for abusers with sex workers often too scared of being penalized to report crime to the police. Laws on sex work should focus on protecting people from exploitation and abuse, rather than trying to ban all sex work and penalize sex workers.

One approach against the illicit sex industry, called the “Nordic Model,” developed in Norway and practiced by authorities in Canada, combats the entangled issues of human trafficking and consensual sex work — by arresting and penalizing customers and pimps, rather than prostitutes, who receive job and other assistance instead of jail time.

Authorities across the U.S. have employed the Nordic Model — including the head of the initiative. TIME reports,

Dart only has jurisdiction in Cook County, but he’s encouraging officers from all over the country to try the buyer-focused approach. Some cities, like Seattle, have developed their own versions of this strategy but traded notes with Dart. Others, like Phoenix, Cincinnati and Houston, followed Dart’s lead on demand suppression. More than 70 agencies have participated in at least one of Dart’s operations, with more than 2,900 buyers arrested across all jurisdictions since 2011. […]

“Some human rights groups take issue with this approach. On August 11 [2015], Amnesty International voted to recommend the complete decriminalization of prostitution, both for the buyers and sellers, saying that criminal laws against the consensual adult sex trade violates the human rights of sex workers. While UNAIDS and the World Health Organization have previously called for the decriminalization of sex work for public health reasons (in order to stop the spread of sexually transmitted diseases), and other groups have advocated the same, Amnesty International is the first major international human rights group to issue a full-throated global public policy recommendation for lifting laws against buying and selling of sex purely on humans rights grounds. Amnesty can’t make or enforce laws, but its recommendations carry international weight.

Fraught doesn’t begin to describe contention internationally over sex work, human trafficking, child exploitation, and similar issues; but, while heavy-handed operations like the Johns Initiative perform a vital role in rescuing victims who might otherwise have slipped through the cracks or gone unnoticed, human rights advocates maintain the only means to combat sexual, criminal exploitation of youth and adults is to legalize sex work — making regulation, health screenings, insurance, and other benefits available to adults in a voluntary profession — theoretically freeing authorities to target child predators and other offenders.

Theoretically, decriminalization of sex work would play out similarly to that of drugs — a decade-long attempt by Portugal to stem violence, curb prison populations, and rein in an addiction epidemic proved taking punitive drug laws off the books works: the nation achieved all three goals and more. Advocates of legalized sex work posit a similar result, with police free to throw resources at cases of true exploitation and trafficking.

Detractors contend elevating prostitution to acceptable will exacerbate the issue by orders of magnitude, by fueling a parallel black market — similar to reports legal cannabis areas of the U.S. have reinvigorated illicit sales.

Undoubtedly, dragnets targeting prostitution and human trafficking serve victims by connecting them to the appropriate aid and locking true abusers and exploiters away from further criminal activity. Indeed, there are enough stories on a weekly basis, in America and across the globe, that show an epidemic of child exploitation is fostering and in dire need of being brought to a halt.

However, it’s imperative to keep in mind corporate media’s penchant for shock and awe to deliver a criminally oversimplified version of exceedingly complex truths — and the National Johns Suppression Initiative has thus far been no exception.

Disingenuously presenting a law enforcement operation as only good cheats the child and adult trafficking victims who could have been rescued — were consensual sex work not a focus of policing at all.

“We realize that decriminalization is not a magic bullet for all of the harms faced by sex workers,” wrote Margaret Huang, Amnesty International USA’s interim executive director, in response to a criticism appearing in Rolling Stone of the organization’s advocacy of legal sex work, in June 2016. “Which is why our policy also calls for governments to protect sex workers from harm, exploitation and coercion, and calls for education and employment options for sex workers. Sex workers must also have a say in developing laws that affect their lives and safety. But without decriminalization, they cannot expect equal treatment under the law to achieve these ends.” (For more from the author of “Massive US Sex Trafficking Bust Ensnares Over 1,000—Including Law Enforcement and Clergy” please click HERE)

___________________________________________

Police: Plane passenger helps cops bust 2 people texting about molesting kids

By Carma Hassan and Joe Sterling. A woman on a Seattle-to-San Jose flight this week . . . spotted a fellow passenger allegedly texting about sexually molesting children, the San Jose police said.

She immediately alerted the crew, leading police to arrest a man and a woman on charges of sexually exploiting minors. . .

The woman, who’s an early childhood educator, saw a male passenger seated in front of her texting the material, the San Jose police said.

[San Jose Police SGT] Spears told CNN the passenger was able to take photos of the man’s text conversation because the font and screen were large.

The texts, Spears said, were “extremely disturbing.” (Read more from this story HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Trump Was Left With No Middle Ground on Transgender Issue

Washington is in an uproar about the president’s decision last week to exclude transgendered people from military service. The president expected a fight, but is surprised at the opposition from conservative, pro-military Republicans. I’m surprised, too.

The 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey of 27,715 respondents nationwide reported 39 percent experienced serious mental problems in the previous month, based on the Kessler 6 Psychological Distress Scale. That compares with five percent of Americans overall. Seven percent of the transgender respondents attempted suicide in the previous year, 12 times the overall national rate.

But the Obama Pentagon announced last summer that transgendered people could serve openly, that it would fund sex-change surgeries within the military’s healthcare budget, and that it was working on a plan to recruit new transsexuals.

I believe the Family Research Council’s Peter Sprigg conducted the best study of the fiscal impact of that new policy. He calculated the total cost over the next 10 years as $1.88 billion at best, and $3.7 billion at worst, without assuming any inflation.

I believe the higher forecast is the more likely one – and for the record, $3.7 billion could buy 39 F-35 fighter jets at $94 million apiece, or 123 CH-47 “Chinook” helicopters at $30 million a pop.

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (R-Missouri) introduced a budget amendment prohibiting sex-change medicine in the military. The deployment of transgenders is hampered not merely by surgical recovery time, but by indefinite and expensive hormone treatments.

“It makes no sense to create soldiers who are unable to fight and win our nation’s wars,” Hartzler argued. But she lost that vote earlier this month after 24 Republicans crossed over to vote with the Democrats against her bill.

This deprived President Trump of the middle ground. He either had to accept all the medical demands and organizational risks of transgender privilege, or exclude transgenders altogether. I believe he made the only decision a conscientious commander-in-chief could have made.

Angry television commentators said a 2016 Rand Corporation report put the medical costs issue to rest. It calculated the net increase in medical costs at no more than $8.4 million annually.

But that 2016 report’s language is so unequivocal that it’s obvious it was written to specification for the Obamists who signed the checks and wanted a green light for their transgender policy.

Scientific American chimed in online, citing the Rand study and noting that its calculations were corroborated by a 2015 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine. I looked it up.

The author of the NEJM article, Dr. Aaron Belkin, estimated that military sex-change medical services would cost taxpayers $5.6 million per year. He wrote that the cost is “too low to warrant consideration in the current policy debate.”

But his prose seemed a little breezy, and his methodology lacked the air-tight rigor that you ordinarily expect in the New England Journal. It turns out that he is not a medical doctor. His PhD is in political science, and he is a gay activist – he’s director of the Palm Center, a San Francisco-based “research” institute he founded to support the repeal of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.

On his own website, he identifies himself as a “scholar, author, activist and dancer.” One year, he was grand marshal of San Francisco’s LGBT Pride Parade. He is in the business of persuading, rather than factual investigation.

In fact, he has written a how-to guide for leftist influencers: How We Won: Progressive Lessons from the Repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

According to a Huffington Post review, the lessons of Belkin’s campaign “could help progressives persuade the public about the merits of other big, liberal ideas, including the benefits of higher taxes and the dangers of an excessively strong military.”

I’d say they’re off to a great start.

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Federal Court Rules Unlicensed Pets Are ‘Contraband’ — Police Can Legally Kill Them

Nikita Smith filed a lawsuit against the Detroit Police Department after they killed her three dogs during a raid of her home in search of pot last year. On Wednesday, a judge absurdly ruled the dogs were considered “contraband,” noting that Smith had no legal basis to sue the police department for shooting and killing her dogs, due to the canines not having been properly licensed.

Subsequently, the federal civil rights lawsuit filed by Smith after a raid of her home by the Detroit police was dismissed by U.S. District Court Judge George Caram Steeh.

According to a report by Reason:

The ruling is the first time a federal court has considered the question of whether an unlicensed pet—in violation of city or state code—is protected property under the Fourth Amendment. Federal courts have established that pets are protected from unreasonable seizures (read: killing) by police, but the city of Detroit argued in a motion in March that Smith’s dogs, because they were unlicensed, were “contraband” for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment, meaning she had no legitimate property interest in them and therefore no basis to sue the officers or department.

Sadly, Judge Steeh agreed with the city’s ridiculous assertion that since the dogs were not licensed, they were not a legitimate property interest, thus giving Smith no legal basis to sue either the department or the individual officer/s that killed her dogs.

“The Court is aware that this conclusion may not sit well with dog owners and animal lovers in general,” the judge Steeh wrote in his opinion. “The reason for any unease stems from the fact that while pet owners consider their pets to be family members, the law considers pets to be property.”

“The requirements of the Michigan Dog Law and the Detroit City Code, including that all dogs be current with their rabies vaccines, exist to safeguard the public from dangerous animals,” he continued. “When a person owns a dog that is unlicensed, in the eyes of the law it is no different than owning any other type of illegal property or contraband. Without any legitimate possessory interest in the dogs, there can be no violation of the Fourth Amendment.”

Think about that for a moment, the judge is legally equating owning an unlicensed dog, with “illegal property or contraband.”

So, does someone owning an unlicensed car give you no Fourth Amendment protections over it, and does it constitute illegal property or contraband simply because it isn’t licensed with the city/state?

Does government somehow have some magical authority to say that if you don’t license your property as they have dictated, then your property is illicit and you have no constitutional protections over it?

Steeh’s opinion went on to reason that since there was no Fourth Amendment violation, then there is no legal basis for a civil rights claim against the city. Additionally, Steeh ruled that even if the dogs had been recognized as her property, the animals presented an imminent threat to police, thus the suit would have been dismissed anyway.

Much in line with the brutal reality that a massive number of dogs across America are being executed, Smith’s suit labeled the police officers’ actions in her home akin to a “dog death squad.” She noted that officers shot one of the dogs through a closed bathroom door. Gruesome photos from the raid revealed a blood-drenched bathroom with Smith’s dog lying in a pool of blood.

In only the past two years, numerous lawsuits have been filed against the Detroit Police Department for executing dogs. Once incident ended with the city paying out $100,000 to settle a suit after police dash cam footage revealed a dog being killed by an officer while still chained up and no threat to officers. The case was one of three lawsuits filed against the DPD for killing dogs during raids in search of cannabis. In another case, filed in June, officers are alleged to have killed a couple’s dogs while they were behind a backyard fence.

The absurdity of raiding people’s homes in an assaultive and violent manner in search of a medicinal plant reeks of government overreach and waste.

The report by Reason noted extremely brutal nature :

A Reason investigation last year found the DPD’s Major Violators Unit, which conducts drug raids in the city, has a track record of leaving dead dogs in its wake. One officer had shot 39 dogs over the course of his career before the raid on Smith’s house, according to public records.

That officer is now up to 73 kills, according to the most recent records obtained by Reason.

Two other officers involved in the Smith raid testified during the trial that they had shot “fewer than 20” and “at least 19” dogs over the course of their careers…

Reason’s review of “destruction of animal” reports filed by Detroit police officers did not find a single instance where a supervisor found that a dog shooting was unjustified.

Does anyone really believe that the officer with 73 dog killings is doing it to protect themselves and other officers from imminent danger? The wanton disregard for life is astonishing and speaks to the extreme levels of brutality we see taking place on American streets on a daily basis.

Once again highlighting the lack of proper training police receive, Judge Steeh’s opinion noted that the “police officers conducting the search had not received any specific training on how to handle animal encounters during raids.”

The court opinion also recognized that Detroit police supervisors found the shooting of Smith’s three dogs all to be justified, but curiously noting:

“However, as in many other cases, the ratifying officers did so without speaking to the officers about what had transpired,” the court wrote.

The search warrant for Smith’s residence came after police received a tip that marijuana was being sold out of the home. The raid, which killed her three dogs, netted a total of 25 grams of marijuana – not even an ounce. Since recent polling support for legalizing cannabis has reached upwards of 80%, perhaps giving police a license to kick down doors, with weapons drawn, in search of a plant, is a recipe for disaster.

Ironically, after the police killed her three dogs, the case against Smith was dismissed due to officers failing to show up for her court hearing. Three murdered dogs, smashed house, no charges, and endless pain and suffering — all for an illegal plant — and this is called justice. (For more from the author of “Federal Court Rules Unlicensed Pets Are ‘Contraband’ — Police Can Legally Kill Them” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

NYT Reporter Claims ‘Terrorists Cheer’ When FBI Stops Illegal Leaks

New York Times reporter Adam Goldman claimed, without citing any evidence, that “terrorists cheer” when the FBI takes actions to stop the illegal leaks of classified information.

Goldman made that unsupported claim on the same day that Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats said that the flood of illegal leaks pose a serious threat to national security.

“FBI diverts resources to hunt down leakers. Terrorists cheer,” Goldman wrote. “So do Russians.”

Goldman’s claim followed Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ announcement on Friday that the Department of Justice will be taking action to stem the flood of illegal leaks flowing out of the executive branch. (Read more from “NYT Reporter Claims ‘Terrorists Cheer’ When FBI Stops Illegal Leaks” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Mother Of Disabled Obamacare Victim: ’Trump Didn’t Snub My Son, Congress Did’

The mother of the boy at the center of a flap with J.K. Rowling says it’s not President Donald Trump who did the snubbing, but Congress.

“You want to know who snubbed my son? Congress snubbed my kid in D.C. when they failed to pass meaningful legislation. Everyone missed the point of why we were there [the White House] in the first place. They [Congress] didn’t come up with a dynamic plan and they didn’t go out and sell it to the American people. If they have a plan, what is it and where is it?”

Rowling recently accused Trump of ignoring the boy during a “Victims of Obamacare” event Monday. Observers were quick to debunk the claim. Days later, Rowling apologized not to Trump, but the boy’s family.

“I appreciate people trying to stand up for me and my family but even slinging mud at people like [Rowling] doesn’t move the conversation. I like action, I like movement and I like solving problems,” Marjorie Weer tells The Daily Caller in an exclusive interview.

Weer says she was overwhelmed by the amount of media coverage after Rowling tweeted a misleading video that appeared to show Trump snubbing Weer’s son as he tried to get the president’s attention. (The video also proved Rowling wrong.) Rowling later deleted the tweets and apologized following an extended public backlash. But, she asks, why aren’t those same media outlets interested in covering the negative impact Obamacare is having on her son’s life? (Read more from “Mother of Disabled Obamacare Victim: ‘Trump Didn’t Snub My Son, Congress Did'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

‘Edge of Constitutional Legality’: Obama White House Oversaw Election Day News Monitoring

Dozens of FBI officials monitored social media on Election Day 2016 looking for “fake news” being spread as part of a Russian disinformation campaign against former candidate Hillary Clinton, multiple sources told CNN.

The FBI knew it was walking a fine legal line by monitoring the media for “fake news,” according to sources. It was part of a larger effort to look for Russian cyber threats to the elections, CNN reported.

“We were right on the edge of Constitutional legality,” a source briefed on the matter told CNN. “We were monitoring news.”

Intelligence officials monitoring social media held conference calls with the White House throughout Election Day. Some minor issues came up, but nothing happened to disrupt voting. (Read more from “‘Edge of Constitutional Legality’: Obama White House Oversaw Election Day News Monitoring” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Church Fighting Allegations of Decades of Abuse

Word of Faith Fellowship (WFF), an international Protestant church based in Spindale, North Carolina, was the subject of an exposé by the Associated Press on July 24, in a piece about allegations that WFF brought church members from Brazil into the United States on tourist and student visas and then forced them to work without pay, essentially enslaving those they pretended to evangelize.

WFF vehemently denied these allegations, stating in a July 30 press release that “we are appalled to learn of the allegations published by the Associated Press regarding foreign members of our church being ‘enslaved.’ Many of these allegations are obviously preposterous on their face and they are all false.”

A testimonial on WFF’s website has called the AP “fake news.” borrowing President Trump’s popular phrase.

AP based its claims on interviews with 16 Brazilian former church members who said they were forced to work without pay and were abused both physically and verbally. Children as young as 12 were allegedly brought from Brazil and put to work immediately at WFF’s property in North Carolina . . .

WFF said such allegations are “ludicrous” and pointed out “people now claim they were in an abusive environment at our church but admit that they traveled from Brazil to the United States many different times, returning repeatedly to their place of alleged enslavement.” (Read more from “Church Fighting Allegations of Decades of Abuse” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Did Supreme Court Cancel Judges’ Free Speech Rights?

A small-town magistrate who lost her job after explaining to a reporter that her Lutheran faith would not allow her to perform a same-sex wedding is petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court.

Ruth Neely is appealing a Wyoming Supreme Court decision against her that if allowed to stand, “poses a broad threat to judges’ expressive freedom, reaching far beyond the circumstances of this case,” contends the petition submitted by her legal team, the Alliance Defending Freedom.

Neely was publicly censured by the Wyoming Commission on Judicial Conduct and Ethics and forced out of her job as a magistrate for explaining to reporter Ned Donovan of the Pinedale, Wyoming, newspaper that her faith precluded her from performing same-sex ceremonies

Donovan told an editor that he wanted to get Neely “sacked,” according to the complaint.

Neely’s comment to the reporter was brought to the attention of Wendy Soto, the executive director of the ethics commission and a former board member of the LGBT advocacy group Wyoming Equality. (Read more from “Did Supreme Court Cancel Judges’ Free Speech Rights?” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Doctor Charged With Groping Teen on Airplane

A New York City doctor has been charged with groping a teen girl on a Newark-bound United Airlines flight last month, according to federal court documents.

The girl’s family has also filed a complaint against United Airlines for the way the incident was handled after the teen reported the groping to a flight attendant, but allowed the man to leave the airport after the flight landed, according to a report in the Washington Post.

Vijakumar Krishnappa, 28, of New York City, was charged July 24 in federal court in Newark, a day after the flight that originated in Seattle, according to court records filed by the FBI charging him with criminal sexual contact.

Krishnappa was sitting next to the girl, who was traveling alone, authorities said. The girl fell asleep and awoke to find Krishnappa’s hand on her thigh, authorities said. He quickly removed his hand, the girl told authorities. (Read more from “Doctor Charged With Groping Teen on Airplane” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Republican Donor Sues GOP for Fraud

A retired attorney in Virginia Beach is so incensed that Republicans couldn’t repeal the Affordable Care Act that he’s suing to get political donations back, accusing the GOP of fraud and racketeering.

Bob Heghmann, 70, filed a lawsuit Thursday in U.S. District Court, saying the national and Virginia Republican parties and some GOP leaders raised millions of dollars in campaign funds while knowing they weren’t going to be able to overturn the law also known as Obamacare.

The GOP “has been engaged in a pattern of Racketeering which involves massive fraud perpetrated on Republican voters and contributors as well as some Independents and Democrats,” the suit said. Racketeering, perhaps better known for use in prosecuting organized crime, involves a pattern of illegal behavior by a specific group.

The lawsuit lists as defendants the Republican National Committee and Virginia’s two national GOP committee members, Morton Blackwell and Cynthia Dunbar, as well as the Republican Party of Virginia and state party Chairman John Whitbeck.

In an email, Blackwell dismissed Heghmann’s complaint as a “frivolous, nuisance suit that should be thrown out of court by any judge.” (Read more from “Republican Donor Sues GOP for Fraud” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.