Southeast Idaho Experiences 140 Earthquakes in Under a Week

People should be prepared for the worst when it comes to the earthquake swarm that’s been shaking Southeast Idaho since Saturday evening . . .

Still, the most alarming scenario is that the earthquake swarm will end with a very destructive 7.0 magnitude earthquake capable of destroying buildings and killing people.

The good news is that the experts say the chance of that happening is very low.

“While we can’t guarantee that there won’t be a larger quake in this area, the possibility is extremely low,” said Shannon Kobs Nawotniak, an Idaho State University geosciences assistant professor who studies earthquakes. “We live in a seismically active area, so everyone should always be up to date on their earthquake safety, just like they would for a fire drill. It is prudent to be prepared, even when the likelihood of the event is very low.”

There have been 141 earthquakes in Southeast Idaho since Saturday evening — all near the Caribou County city of Soda Springs. There were 25 quakes Wednesday, 20 on Tuesday, 28 on Monday, 34 throughout the day on Sunday and 34 on Saturday night. All 141 of the quakes were reported by University of Utah Seismograph Stations. (Read more from “Southeast Idaho Experiences 140 Earthquakes in Under a Week” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Planned Parenthood on DREAMers: ‘Every Person Has the Right to Live’

For those who run abortion giants such as the National Abortion Rights Action League and Planned Parenthood, the immigration policy fight going on in the United States now is all about … abortion.

Shortly after Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Tuesday the end of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program created by President Obama as a “temporary” plan to protect illegal aliens while Congress acted, Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood, tweeted: “Our doors remain open to all, including DREAMers and DACA recipients – no matter what.”

Richards, after describing the president’s action as “Cruel. Unacceptable,” soon added: “Time to fight like hell. One step you can take right away: Call Congress. Tell them to pass the #DREAMAct.”

The comment drew stunned disbelief on Twitter.

eMarc21 responded, “Please don’t complain about deporting children if you support murdering them.” (Read more from “Planned Parenthood on DREAMers: ‘Every Person Has the Right to Live'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Intergenerational Larceny: We Are All Thieves

What is it about Illinois? When I was learning my multiplication tables in a downstate elementary school there, we were proud of our governor, Otto Kerner Jr. He was descended from German-speaking Czechs, and a son-in-law of the assassinated Chicago mayor Anton Cermak. He was a two-star general in the National Guard, after commanding field artillery units in both the European and Pacific theaters in World War II.

He was so well respected that, after race riots in Los Angeles, Chicago and Newark, the president asked him to chair the 11-member National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. The committee’s report, seven months later, was on the front pages of big-city newspapers. All we knew was the called it the Kerner Report.

But by the time they were whacking algebra into me in an adjacent state, Kerner had fallen into disgrace. It had something to do with racetracks and bribery (which Maryland Gov. Spiro Agnew also found irresistible around that same time). He ended up going to federal prison, where he may have seen some old acquaintances from his seven years as U.S. Attorney for Northern Illinois.

Kerner wasn’t the first or the last Illinois governor to end up in prison. In fact, four of the past eight Illinois governors have gone to jail.

And it isn’t just governors. Former congressman Jesse Jackson Jr. recently served 30 months in federal prison. Disgraced House Speaker “Coach” Dennis Hastert became federal inmate number 47991-424 last year.

Former Chicago Cubs slugger Sammy Sosa never went to jail, but his disgrace compares with those who did. He was proven dirty, and his records deserve an asterisk.

But is Illinois unique, or is it typical? It might be overrepresented, but there’s undeniably a lot of cheating elsewhere in this country.

No account of cheating would be complete without a shout-out to Texan Lance Armstrong. He was a philanthropist and a cancer survivor. One would expect an intolerance of anything false or shallow. But his thirst for recognition was insatiable – he would take it by fraud, he would take it by browbeating, but he would not deny himself applause.

Years ago, when my son was a serious weightlifter, I bought him “The Kennelly Method,” by Ryan Kennelly of Washington state. It was a slim volume by the bench press world-record holder. Ryan was a soft-spoken but articulate young guy who had invented some lifting accessories and was generous with his advice on other lifters’ websites and YouTube channels. I thought he might be an inspirational role model for my son.

Then local police searched Ryan’s apartment and seized 84 vials of steroids. If that were me, I think I would have been chastened, and gotten out of the steroid business. But three years later, a federal grand jury indicted him for possession of lab equipment for the manufacture of steroids, possession of steroids, and intent to deliver steroids. Cheating, it seems, is addictive.

How else to explain the reckless self-destruction of Rep. Randy Cunningham (R-Calif.) and Gov. Bob McDonnell of Virginia? Did McDonnell actually need to cadge a fur coat for his wife? Surely he could afford to clothe his own wife. Cunningham was plucked from the private sector in Southern California to stand for office. He could have made a much larger income, if he chose, by staying out of government, or by leaving it. Why did he enter public service, then take bribes?

These publicly disgraced people deserve the penalties they suffered. I would oppose any leniency. But I don’t think they are fundamentally different from the rest of us. The basic human impulse for larceny is, if not universal, at least pervasive.

That’s why the Earned Income Credit is so popular. It’s why we claim a right to sign up for health insurance after we become unhealthy, guaranteed against rejection for pre-existing conditions, or we run up enormous uninsured medical expenses, then take bankruptcy. It’s why we want richer people (than us) to pay our taxes for us.

And it’s why we Baby Boomers borrow every nickel out of our Social Security trust fund to pay for government programs, leaving bales of IOUs instead of cash, then insist that younger workers pay those IOUs back to us, out of their future earnings.

Intergenerational larceny will have very grave consequences. Grievous debt will deprive our grandchildren of their capacity for self-government. They will build fewer needed schools, roads and hospitals because they’ll be paying off our self-indulgence. Their military will be hamstrung. Classroom sizes will swell. Infrastructure will slowly disintegrate.

Are too many politicians and professional athletes corrupt? Yes, one would be too many. But we’re corrupt, too. Shame on us if we don’t protect and endow future generations instead of pillaging them.

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

ISIS Urges Supporters to Poison Food at U.S. Grocery Stores

After urging its supporters in the west to turn cars into weapons, guidance that inspired terror attacks in the UK, Spain and France, ISIS is now calling for sympathizers to poison the food in US supermarkets with cyanide, according to SITE.

In recent days, channels associated with the terrorist army have posted calls for attacks on Europe, Russia and the United States to mark the occasion of the Islamic “Sacrifice Feast” Eid al Adha. In the third part of an English-language series on jihad, IS advised would-be attackers to inject food for sale in markets with cyanide poison. According to Spiesa, the organization has tested these methods on prisons, causing horrifically painful deaths.

“The Islamic State group used prisoners as “human guinea pigs,” carrying out chemical weapons experiments in order to plan for attacks against the West, documents found in Mosul have revealed. The papers detailing the tests, which led to the agonizing deaths of prisoners, were discovered at Mosul University in January when it was recaptured by Iraqi special forces. The documents verified by United States and British forces were detailed by The Times in a report published Saturday.

Prisoners had their food and water contaminated by the sprinkling of chemicals found in easily accessible pesticides. The US and Britain now fear that the same methods could be used on a larger scale to contaminate food supplies in the West.”

(Read more from “ISIS Urges Supporters to Poison Food at U.S. Grocery Stores” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

State of the Union: A Dictatorship of Lawyers Is Still a Dictatorship

In the waning days of the Soviet Union under Gorbachev, giddy foreign journalists asked a Soviet official whether his country was headed for Western-style democracy. He replied that the Soviets didn’t want to exchange the dictatorship of the proletariat for a dictatorship of the lawyers.

At the time, I thought it was an insolent retort from a grumpy Communist who resented the question. Since then, I’ve come to see its wisdom. My country, founded by freedom-loving men and women, sometimes resembles a dictatorship of, by and for the lawyers.

I’m not a lawyer-hater. Thank God we have conscientious lawyers to represent us and advise us. I’m not against voting some of them into office as legislators. They’ve made wretched presidents in my lifetime, but my top choice in the recent presidential primaries was a well-known lawyer.

I believe in the rule of law, just not in the rule of lawyers. My main problem with lawyers comes after they are appointed to be federal judges. I don’t envy them. It’s obviously a difficult job. We need to insulate them from reprisals and improper pressure, but we don’t want to create monarchs. That’s kind of a touchy subject for real Americans.

Start with the idea of lifetime tenure. Who else but a federal judge has lifetime tenure without gerrymandering? Just royalty and nobility, which the Constitution supposedly outlaws in America.

Maybe I’m expecting too much of judges who are, after all, just human. But when we give them such extraordinary and dangerous powers over us, I guess we hope for an incorruptible priesthood of steely integrity and buddha-like indifference to material or political ambition.

Alas, we got off on the wrong foot in 1803 with Marbury v. Madison, a bit of Supreme Court jiu-jitsu that established “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” Ever since then, federal judges have reserved the right to overturn legislation that they deem

inconsistent with the Constitution. This might have been a happy turn of events had the judges confined themselves to the letter of the Constitution, or to the original intent of its framers.

But federal judges have treated the Constitution as a sort of wild card. The late Justice William Douglas spoke of its “penumbra and emanations,” creating a jurisprudence that is hard to distinguish from hallucination.

Eventually, Supreme Court decisions would cite a Constitutional right to privacy (found nowhere in the actual text of the Constitution) to justify Roe v. Wade, open season on unborn human babies. Federal judges would overturn state ballot initiative results, because voters were motivated by “animus” against homosexuals. The Supreme Court would order the states to extend the rights and privileges of marriage to Sodomites. And federal judges would dictate immigration policy over the objections of an elected president.

This is not a friendly difference of opinion. It’s a judicial coup d’etat.

But arrogance is not the only source of judicial corruption. Sometimes it’s timid deference to a menacing, dictatorial president.

When Franklin Roosevelt attempted to dilute the Supreme Court with six of his own judges, the Court’s decisions promptly veered left. After President Obama (a lawyer) disrespected the Supreme Court in a State of the Union speech, and after Sen. Patrick Leahy (a lawyer) signaled that Chief Justice John Roberts would be discredited if he opposed Obamacare, Roberts (a lawyer) switched sides and affirmed the Constitutionality of the coercive “individual mandate.”

We’re not going to change human nature. Lawyers will have their frailties, just like us. But we owe our grandchildren a free country, not a dictatorship.

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

This Is the Teen That Anthony Weiner Was Sexting?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

By Betsy Rothstein. The mystery teen who sexted with Anthony Weiner is coming forward to talk about her experience. She wasn’t willing to let Inside Edition use her name. But she did agree to go on air and talk about what happened to her . . .

According to a release, the girl says that she contacted Weiner when his wife – Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin – was at the peak of her influence working on the presidential campaign.

She says Weiner’s power is what attracted her to him. “I knew that Hillary Clinton would be running for president in the year 2016,” she says. “I wanted to see if Anthony was still up to the same antics.”

The girl says the communication quickly moved from niceties to flirting. “I knew that it was going downhill very fast,” she says. “He called me attractive.”

Other messages Weiner sent her: “You are kinda gorgeous,” “Your body is pretty insane,” and “I thought about you this AM.” According to Inside Edition, some of the messages are “so obscene” they can’t be shown on TV. (Read more from “This Is the Teen That Anthony Weiner Was Sexting?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!” HERE)

_____________________________________________

Weiner’s Laptop at Center of Controversy; Cops Still Haven’t Released Contents

In an exclusive interview with Inside Edition, the underage girl said she sent the former Queens congressman a direct message on Twitter in January of 2016 when she was 15 year-old.

She said the messages from the Democrat quickly turned obscene — in one of them, Weiner posed shirtless with his young son. . .

Weiner’s previous sexting scandals had derailed his political career. This time, his wife Huma Abedin was helping to run Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

When the FBI started investigating Weiner’s lewd communications with the teen they confiscated his laptop. On his laptop they found a new batch of emails that Clinton had sent Abedin.

That led to former FBI Director James Comey to re-open the investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server while Secretary of State, just days before the election. (Read more about the Sexting scandal HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

I Rewrote the New York Times’ Report on Sen. Bob Menendez’s Corruption Trial as If He Was a Republican

You probably already know that yesterday’s New York Times report on the trial of Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ) was buried on page A15.

You probably also know that the original version of the story omitted Menendez’s party affiliation.

After a brief uproar, the Times finally added the Senator’s party to the story.

I took the liberty of rewriting the story originally authored by Nick Corasaniti — if that is his real name. I just pretended that Menendez was a Republican, in which case this story would have been on page A1, above the fold…

NEWARK — The Republican senator and key ally of troubled president Donald Trump paused in a corridor of the federal courthouse here last month to scream back at brave #Resistance protesters.

Spittle flecks flew from his mouth as the Senator, his face beet red, began resembling nothing less than Satan himself. His security guards absorbed a peaceful beating from the courageous Antifa members who had assembled to protest his all-too-typical Republican corruption. The GOP senator then disappeared through the double wooden doors to the courtroom

The curious moment highlighted the unusual predicament facing Mr. Menendez (R-NJ), a senior senator, and powerful ally of Donald Trump, whose presidency is still clouded by investigations of Russian collusion during the campaign.

For the first time in 36 years, a sitting United States Senator — a Republican — is facing a federal bribery trial, one that comes as a bitterly divided Congress reconvenes amid the unrelenting controversy, turbulence, skulduggery, and alleged corruption of the Trump administration.

Since his indictment more than two years ago, Mr. Menendez, a Republican, has steadfastly denied his obvious guilt. As recently as last week, during a hysterically embarrassing interview, Menendez obviously and falsely claimed he will “be exonerated.”

The GOP senator is charged with 12 corruption-related counts, including six counts of bribery and three counts of services fraud.

Indeed, the defense for the Trump ally is unlikely to dispute some of the facts; that Dr. Salomon Melgen, a wealthy Florida ophthalmologist, bestowed on the senator lavish gifts of private flights, luxury accommodations and free vacations – all which Mr. Menendez initially failed to disclose — and he made more than $700,000 in direct and indirect political contributions to Mr. Menendez.

The legal case revolves around the ludicrous contention that those gifts were permissible as gifts a friend could give to another, or whether they were part of a longstanding bribery arrangement where Mr. Menendez would intervene to protect the financial and personal interests of Dr. Melgen in return for his gifts and donations.

Given that Menendez is a Republican, his guilt seems obvious, according to several anonymous sources.

Mendendez’s likely conviction poses problems for the narrow Republican majority. Their agenda, already stymied by the brilliant tactics of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, is certain to be further compromised given the heavy odds that Menendez will soon be serving time.

Despite numerous calls to the White House, President Trump and his laughable “spokespersons” could not be reached for comment at press time.

[CONTINUED ON PAGE A2]

(For more from the author of “I Rewrote the New York Times’ Report on Sen. Bob Menendez’s Corruption Trial as If He Was a Republican” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Battles Lines Drawn in the Fight for School Choice

It’s looking likely that a school choice bill passed by the Arizona legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Doug Ducey will ultimately be decided by voters in 2018.

Senate Bill 1431, a measure that expands eligibility for students to enroll in a school-voucher program, was passed in April. The bill makes all 1.1 million Arizona students eligible to apply for the state’s Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) — a program in which students in public schools can use a voucher to attend a school of their choice, be it public or private.

Previously, only a select group of students in Arizona were eligible to apply, such as children with disabilities or students enrolled in under-performing schools. The ESA program now gives eligibility to all Arizona students, but it caps actual enrollment to 30,000.

After its passage in the state legislature, however, opposition groups garnered more than enough signatures to block its implementation.

Save Our Schools, an organization formed in resistance to the bill, collected 111,540 signatures to force Senate Bill 1431 to the ballot box. Only 75,321 valid signatures were needed.

Implementation of the measure has been put on hold as the secretary of state’s office checks the validity of the signatures. If the office finds that there are enough valid signatures (which is likely, given the high number submitted), the expansion of the program will be left for voters to decide next year.

Opponents argue the Arizona school system is already underfunded — the state historically ranks very low in terms of student performance — and an expansion of ESA would only siphon more money away from cash-starved schools.

“The fundamental argument is that we’re not adequately funding the education system that we have, that the vast majority of families are using. So let’s not create another way of cutting into that funding until we’ve solved that,” said Dawn Penich Thacker, the communications director of Save Our Schools Arizona.

Thacker spoke to Western Journalism about why her group is against the expansion of ESA and what needs to be done to fix the Arizona school system.

“Our main issue was that this was not a collaborative process. One movement got to have its say. So Save Our Schools Arizona wants to back away from that, put it to the voters and then say ‘let’s start over.’ What will help education in Arizona? It will probably be a hybrid of things. It will probably be a mix of choice options, public education and who knows what else. But let’s have that conversation,” she said.

“It’s hard to improve if you’re broke. Our schools are no different.”

Thacker pointed out that despite Arizona families having “choice” options, the vast majority of them choose public schools for their children. She believes if the bill is put into the hands of voters, they will ultimately choose to vote down an expansion of ESA.

“Voters want a strong education system that is built in. Ninety-five percent of Arizona families, even though we are a choice state, are still choosing public options.”

Thacker said she was caught off guard by the amount of private and home school family volunteers petitioning against ESA expansion.

These unlikely opponents of the measure told her that its implementation would lead to the type of regulation that they tried to get away from in the public system. Accepting voucher money from the government would, in their eyes, eventually take away choice.

They believe this particular law would take away the freedom that they get with current school choice options.

“Whenever you take something from the government, there are going to be strings attached,” Thacker warned.

But there are many supporters of ESA expansion who do not see it this way.

“The number of dollars that would be affected by this change, while it’s an important change, is still pretty narrow. This is almost a pilot program. It’s capped at just a few thousand kids who are going to be able to take advantage of it. In a state this size, giving these sorts of ESA options to a few thousand kids, is not a significant shift of dollars away from public schools,” said Kory Langhofer, an attorney for the Goldwater Institute.

The Goldwater Institute filed a lawsuit over the attempt to delay the program’s expansion. The conservative think tank believes school choice empowers families and students, and it argues that halting the program’s implementation is putting the education of Arizona children in limbo.

“What this bill does is if your kid is not getting a proper education, it gives you a chance to fix that. It gets your kid into a better school where they can learn to be successful,” Langhofer told Western Journalism.

Langhofer said Arizona children can’t wait 18 months for a 2018 voter referendum (what would take place if the signatures collected by Save Our Schools are deemed valid).

“The reason people are opposing the referendum is because if your kid is in a bad school right now and you need to get them a better education, you can’t afford to wait 18 months for that. The bill can be put on hold, but your kid’s third-grade education can’t be put on hold,” Langhofer said.

Currently, the ESA program is only available for a select group of Arizona students. Langhofer pointed out that these students are in the best position to say whether it works, and he argued they approve.

“The families who are using the program are in the best position to say whether it’s helping them and they seem to happy. They continue to stay in the program.”

Langhofer and other supporters of school choice support the bill that was passed by the Arizona legislature. He believes Gov. Ducey has done a good job in tackling education issues.

“Fixing education is not easy. It’s extremely expensive. I think it’s the biggest line item in the state’s budget and if you’re going to make meaningful changes that large and run by bureaucracy, it’s difficult to turn the ship. The changes he (Ducey) made have been good for education, good for school choice.”

If and when the decision to expand school choice is left to the citizens of Arizona, Langhofer is expecting a tough campaign for the hearts and minds of the state’s voters. (For more from the author of “Battles Lines Drawn in the Fight for School Choice” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

California City Will Pay Gang Members to Remain Peaceful

This isn’t a satire on ultra-liberal California.

FOX News 40 reports: “After a violent weekend of suspected gang-related shootings, Tuesday the Sacramento City Council took action to reduce the bloodshed.”

“It approved a controversial program called Advance Peace, which offers cash stipends to gang members who remain peaceful.”

“The program targets key gang agitators, offering them cash stipends to graduate [from] school and remain peaceful…But the city would still have to pay half the cost of the program, $1.5 million out of the city’s general fund.”

In other words, Sacramento, the capital city of the state of California, has surrendered.

Investigations, arrests, prosecutions, and prison sentences won’t cut it.

Here is the scenario that comes to mind. A suburban teenager on the outskirts of the city shows up in his parents’ living room one day with the tattoo of a grinning skull on his neck.

“Don’t be upset,” he says. “I’m joining a gang. I’ll still get good grades in school, but when I graduate, the city will give me a cash prize. I can use the money to start my own tech firm in our garage…”

But this is piddling stuff. Let’s go all the way to Governor Jerry Brown’s office. Let’s have a state-wide “advance peace” program. The state, which is already $500 billion in debt, when you add in unfunded future liabilities, could throw a billion dollars into a pool.

Over a period of, say, five years, the money would be doled out to gangs, based on their performance. Subtract $250,000 for every gang killing in the state, $125,000 for every wounding, $10,000 for every property crime, $1000 for every drug bust. Whatever is left over for the gangs is their gravy.

Eventually, through negotiation, replace the California legislature and governor with gang members. Let them run things.

I’m just trying to be helpful. I see the direction policy is taking, and I want to give it a boost and quicken the pace.

After all, when gang members end up taking over the state government, all gang crime would cease.

It would be reclassified as government corruption.

Pop the champagne corks. Problem solved. (For more from the author of “California City Will Pay Gang Members to Remain Peaceful” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Meet the Secret CIA-Funded Group Behind the ‘War on Terror’

Bilderberg has gained a reputation as the world’s most secretive group of billionaires and political leaders who conspire to impact global events—but reports indicate that they don’t hold a candle to another group that includes a host of war criminals responsible for the “War on Terror.”

The group is named Le Cercle. In a report dated Sept. 13, 1982, the German publication Der Spiegel describes it as a “legal cartel” made up of “loyal Bundesnachrichtendienst agents, foreign intelligence agents, reactionary politicians and ultra-right journalists” who played a crucial role in the 1980 election.

The existence of the group was revealed by Bavarian constitutional protector Hans Langemann. According to the report, he described the group as:

“In the case of CERCLE, which is clearly defamatory,” as far as my earlier knowledge of the BND “and my present knowledge are concerned, a “loose” “concentration “about two times a year and at various” places of conservative- anti-Communist politician,” “publicists, bankers, and VIPs of other professions,” “which originated in the former French Prime Minister Antoine PINAY, and the circle to which guests are invited continues to this day.”

Former U.S. Defense Secretary and President of the World Bank Paul Wolfowitz, former Iraqi Coalition Provisional Authority Leader Paul Bremer, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and former Chairman of the Defense Department’s Defense Policy Board Richard Perle—some of the most notable neoconservative architects of the Iraq War—are all reportedly members.

Other reported American members of Le Cercle include former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, former Directors of Central Intelligence Bill Casey and William Colby, and former President Richard Nixon after he left the White House.

In a report from The Independent dated June 28, 1997, the “exclusive think-tank said to be funded by the CIA” is mentioned because its chairman at the time, former Member of Parliament Jonathan Aitken, was reportedly going to be removed over a libel trial that ultimately sent him to prison for perjury.

Accusations that Le Cercle receives funding from the CIA have been made by Robin Ramsay, editor of Lobster Magazine; and by John E Lewis, author of The Mammoth Book of Cover-Ups.

As the report noted, “the group’s existence is only occasionally disclosed” following its creation in the 1950s:

Cercle was intended to cement Franco-German relations, as a buffer to Soviet aggression during the Cold War. Down the years, however, it has become much more, advocating right-wing causes round the world and growing into a confidential talking shop for about 70 politicians, businessmen, polemicists and personnel from the diplomatic and security services. Members are invited to attend its meetings; they cannot ask to be admitted, and as a condition of attending they agree to keep all sessions secret. It meets twice a year, once in Washington DC in the autumn and once in the early part of the year in an ‘overseas’ venue.

The Independent described senior member Brian Crozier as an “author and well-known Cold-Warrior with close ties to MI6 and the CIA” who wrote a “planning paper” for Le Cercle in 1979. In addition to securing changes of government in Germany and the United Kingdom (where Margaret Thatcher became Prime Minister in 1979), the agenda included objectives such as:

“Undercover financial transactions for political aims”
“International campaigns aiming to discredit hostile personalities or events”
“Creation of a (private) intelligence service specializing in a selective point of view”
“Establishment of offices under suitable cover each run by a coordinator from the central office. Current plans cover London, Washington, Paris, Munich and Madrid”

In a report on the history of Le Cercle, British news source True Publica noted that the 1982 Langemann Papers were “the first significant leak to expose the activities of Le Cercle, confirming that the group was actively involved in influencing Western European elections.”

Its purpose is to subvert the democratic principles and processes of individual countries and are by nature ideologically ‘hawkish’ – distributing propaganda, stoking fear of communist plots from Russia, vote rigging and hacking the accounts of politicians and prominent global figures. Promoting the ‘war on terror’ has been a major factor in their activities of recent years and in so doing broker weapons deals and setting up false flag operations the world over to suit its own agenda.

While the majority of the information surrounding Le Cercle is covert and secretive—especially regarding its activity in recent years—one of the most important things to remember about the think tank is that its presence is well-documented, its members include influential U.S. politicians, there have been accusations of funding by the CIA, and yet mainstream media in the United States has ignored its existence and influence for decades. (For more from the author of “Meet the Secret CIA-Funded Group Behind the ‘War on Terror'” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.