The CDC Has Identified a Polio-Like Virus in the U.S.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warned about an uptick in the number of cases of acute flaccid myelitis, a disease that the agency described as being polio-like. . .

While the symptoms of this virus has been described as polio-like, it is not polio, which has been eradicated in most of the world. The symptoms are also similar to non-polio enteroviruses, adenoviruses, and the West Nile virus.

It is also not clear where the virus came from. The CDC has yet to figure out a common link between all the cases that have been reported, although they did note that several of them seem to have been linked to infections by other viruses, enterovirus D68. However, this was not true in all cases.

There have been 386 confirmed cases of AFM since 2014. In 2015, the CDC identified 22 patients who exhibited symptoms of AFM. In 2016, that number rose to 149. It dipped back down to 33 in 2017, before rising again in 2018. The total reported number for this year is 127, but the CDC has only confirmed 62 of those cases so far. . .

While the CDC is not sure what the cause of AFM is, the agency suggested that the best methods for preventing the spread of this disease included staying “up to date on polio vaccinations,” avoiding being bitten by mosquitoes, and washing hands. (Read more from “The CDC Has Identified a Polio-Like Virus in the U.S.” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

4 Critical Unanswered Questions About Jamal Khashoggi

It has been over two weeks since Jamal Khashoggi disappeared in Istanbul, Turkey, on October 2. While a quick search for Jamal Khashoggi will result in thousands of new daily articles on the latest details in his case, we still do not have answers to the most basic questions surrounding his likely death.

How did Khashoggi establish U.S. residency?

We still do not know how Khashoggi managed to immediately establish U.S. residency in June 2017, following his self-exile from Saudi Arabia.

It’s quite shocking that a man with direct connections to the founders of al Qaeda and who openly supported and rooted for the U.S.-designated terrorist organization Hamas was able to skip the line and acquire a green card in such a short time.

Perhaps Khashoggi was helped by several influential backers. He had at least one billionaire patron in the controversial Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who has several connections to American companies and government figures.

Khashoggi did spend his college years in the United States, graduating from Indiana State University in 1983. It’s unclear whether that helped him establish residency.

How did Khashoggi cut to the front of the line?

How did Jamal Khashoggi lose his life?

Turkish and Qatari media outlets have insisted for weeks, without providing evidence, that Khashoggi was a victim of torture and brutal dismemberment by Saudi officials. The state-sponsored news outlets continue to repeat the claims, citing audio and video footage of Khashoggi’s supposed execution. Yet following his October 2 disappearance, none of that reported evidence has seen the light of day.

It’s safe, at this point, to assume that Khashoggi is no longer with us. However, we still have no idea what exactly happened to him after he entered the consulate in Istanbul. Was Khashoggi the victim of a botched rendition? Was he brutally murdered? That remains entirely unknown.

Why is there a media blackout on Khashoggi’s radicalism?

From his decades-long relationship with Osama bin Laden to his support for terror until his last days, Jamal Khashoggi wished death upon whom he perceived as his enemies and wanted to instigate violent revolutions in the Middle East. These simple facts are readily available in publications such as Conservative Review, The Federalist, Frontpage Mag, and in other new media sites, but are very difficult to find in the pages of legacy media publications.

His Arabic writings and commentary are readily available for all to read. They reveal his clear ideology as a regressive Islamist who followed the Muslim Brotherhood playbook on overthrowing America’s Gulf allies and waging war against Israel.

Khashoggi’s writings have on several occasions expressed support for the U.S.-designated terrorist group Hamas. He was also staunch defender of al Qaeda co-founder Abdullah Azzam.

Moreover, Khashoggi’s tweets are rife with anti-Semitism. He excused Palestinian terrorism as a reaction to “Jewish usurpers.” He hated Israel in its entirety, hoping that it would one day “die by force.” Khashoggi also mitigated the importance of the Holocaust, comparing it to the Palestinian “Nakba.”

The New York Times, Washington Post, and countless more outlets have published hour-by-hour updates on the Khashoggi situation. Yet hardly any legacy media publications have found the space to recount his well-documented radicalism. Why is that?

Why did the Washington Post hire Khashoggi?

Mr. Khashoggi began writing for the Washington Post in September 2017, only a couple months after he moved to the United States.

We know that he was a virulent critic of President Trump. Khashoggi came on as a “Global Opinions” columnist following his claim that he was banned from Saudi Arabia for criticizing Riyadh’s relationship with the new president. Was Khashoggi hired to provide an international angle to the paper’s anti-Trump resistance?

There’s also the reality that the Left has become very cozy with the Muslim Brotherhood and other regressive Islamist groups. It’s possible that the Khashoggi hiring was simply more evidence of the Left’s sympathy for Islamists. Or did one of his billionaire patrons or U.S.-based contacts use connections to secure the gig for Khashoggi?

With so much at stake, it’s time to get to the bottom of these critical questions surrounding the Khashoggi affair. (For more from the author of “4 Critical Unanswered Questions About Jamal Khashoggi” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

‘Pro-Life Is Pro-Science’: March for Life Taking Abortion Proponents Back to School

The March for Life has announced the 2019 theme of its annual national pro-life demonstration, and it takes aim at one of the pro-abortion crowd’s flimsiest crutches.

Through its new theme, “Unique from day one: Pro-life is pro-science,” the March highlights the scientific underpinnings behind the pro-life movement.

“Pro-life is pro-science,” March for Life President Jeanne Mancini told reporters at a Capitol Hill press conference on Thursday, “and science should always be at the service of life, not the reverse.”

“Science makes it clear that human life and our uniqueness as individuals is true from the moment of conception or fertilization,” Mancini added. “And that’s why every january, we march.”

“For us to believe what the pro-abortion movement tells us about early human life and the flourishing of women and the decency of our culture requires blindness, deafness, and silencing of the truth,” said Dr. Grazie Pozo Christie, a radiologist and policy adviser for the Catholic Association.

“But modern science has changed everything,” Christie said, referring to medical advancements such as in the area of prenatal imaging that give us a better look at our children before they make their birthday debuts. “It has opened our eyes, it’s opened our ears, and it’s allowed us to speak the truth with perfect confidence.”

At the press conference, Christie also pointed out that the original version of the Hippocratic oath also prohibited physicians who took it from participating in abortions as further evidence of the scientific support for pro-life beliefs.

At the event, the organization also unveiled this powerful video to accompany this year’s theme. It’s definitely worth a watch. (For more from the author of “‘Pro-Life Is Pro-Science’: March for Life Taking Abortion Proponents Back to School” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Meanwhile, Jeff Sessions Is Quietly Tackling Hezbollah and Ms-13 in Our Backyard

For far too long, our foreign policy, counterterrorism apparatus, and intelligence assets have been almost exclusively directed at threats in the Middle East. But what about the drug cartels, transnational gangs, and Hezbollah in the Western Hemisphere operating in our own backyard and coming over the border? After all, the purpose of foreign policy is our national security.

The Obama administration spent years covering up the threat Hezbollah and the drug cartels pose to our people right here inside our own borders. Now the Justice Department, led by Jeff Sessions, is making transnational gangs and the transnational crime that funds terrorism on our own shores a priority.

While we were refereeing endless Islamic civil wars halfway around the world, the Obama administration turned a blind eye to Hezbollah’s billion-dollar crime industry in our own hemisphere that is funding terror, often from businesses of Shiite immigrants to the U.S. In a major expose in Politico earlier this year, it was revealed that Obama shut down Operation Cassandra, the join counterterror and crime task force designed to disrupt Hezbollah in Latin America – all to appease Iran and pave the road for the nuclear deal.

“In its determination to secure a nuclear deal with Iran, the Obama administration derailed an ambitious law enforcement campaign targeting drug trafficking by the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hezbollah, even as it was funneling cocaine into the United States,” wrote Josh Meyer in one of Politico’s greatest pieces of journalism ever. Since then, a record number of people have died from cocaine, even as deaths from other drugs have plateaued.

Ironically, it was none other than the infamous Bruce Ohr who was put in charge of the operation that was undermined before it could do any work. That in itself should indicate how important Hezbollah’s Latin America operation is to Iran’s geopolitical goals: much more important to our national security and border security than, say, the Yemeni civil war.

Well, what a difference a new attorney general makes. Earlier this week, Jeff Sessions designated MS-13, Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG), Sinaloa Cartel, Clan del Golfo, and Lebanese Hezbollah as transnational crime organizations (TCOs). He organized a Transnational Organized Crime Task Force designed to coordinate activities between drug agents, law enforcement, counterterrorism, and intelligence assets to disrupt the full spectrum of their activities in our hemisphere. Terrorism is increasingly funded through transnational crime, most prominently the drug trade, and all of these organizations pose a threat either on our own soil or to our border through the flow of Middle Eastern and Latin American migrants controlled by gangs and drug cartels – with Hezbollah lurking in the background.

Former DEA Special Operations Division head Derek Maltz told me he is heartened by the move and hopes it will finally rectify the mistakes of the past. The key to not repeating the failures of the past is cross-agency unity and information sharing, according to Maltz. “The Trump administration inherited a dysfunctional mess in regards to the transnational organized crime threats to America. It’s great to see leadership in action with the public announcements yesterday. Now we need focus, interagency cooperation, accountability, and results. The best and brightest in the U.S. have the potential to shut these crime and terror networks down only if they unite.”

Maltz’s division was at the center of the investigation into hundreds of used car lots owned by Shiite extremists on our own soil. These businesses were being funneled extra cash from Hezbollah’s banking empire to purchase extra used cars here in the U.S. In a circuitous laundering operation, those cars were then sent to lawless West African countries and resold, the proceeds used for drug operations both in Europe and in the Western Hemisphere. Much of the funds, of course, were used to purchase weapons for the endless struggles in the Middle East. The second part of the Politico expose provided a useful infographic showing the flow of crime, drugs, and terror. Ayman Joumaa, a Hezbollah operative and a dual Colombian-Lebanese citizen, was at the nexus of this operation and was indicted for laundering drugs and contraband for the brutal Las Zetas cartel. “This is two for the price of one,” says Maltz. “They immigrate to America, use our generosity against us to fund terror, and then make more money off a drug trade that is also killing our youth.”

The Obama administration did nothing to follow up on the work of these agencies, and no other indictments have followed. None of these car lot owners have even been deported.

Given that Hezbollah sits at the nexus of special interest alien smuggling to our border, drugs, gangs, and subversion activities in Latin America, this designation by Sessions will have positive effects on our allies in Latin America. One of the forgotten trends in Latin America is that a number of countries have recently elected pro-Trump governments willing to work with us on combatting Iran’s influence and fighting organized crime and drug trafficking. Brazil, Argentina, Peru, and Guatemala are some good examples.

Joseph Humire, executive director of the Center for a Secure Free Society, served as an expert witness in a first-of-its-kind anti-Hezbollah trial in Peru and told me this task force will have a very positive effect on sharing and learning intel from our allies there:

“Designating Hezbollah as a Transnational Criminal Organization (TCO) allows our regional partners in Latin America to increase their focus on the crime-terror organization. While most Latin American countries don’t have adequate legal frameworks to deal with foreign terrorist organizations, they have significantly improved their capabilities (legal and operational) to deal with TCOs. This puts us in sync with our southern neighbors to more effectively dismantle Hezbollah’s crime-terror network.”

Many countries in Latin America and in West Africa that are home to Hezbollah’s crime syndicates will be more likely to cooperate with us now that we are going after crime activities that adversely affect them. Moreover, given that organized crime and drug trafficking are now the fuel of terrorism, drying up their networks is the most effective way of combatting terror, much more so than nation-building and refereeing civil wars.

By simply using soft power to clamp down on criminal aliens, terror financing, and drug trafficking, we can stop a huge amount of death and mayhem while also remaking our foreign policy. Clearly, this has been a priority for Sessions. On my podcast several months ago, Sessions said, “We also have people who get in here and make money off the United States and then send money to terrorist groups. … We’ve got a string of cases we are continually prosecuting. … Some of them are recent immigrants. … This is a top, top priority for us.”

The designation of MS-13 and the drug cartels as TCOs is also welcome news. Todd Bensman, a former intelligence analyst for the Texas Department of Public Safety and senior national security fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, told me that the designation will net quick results. “Designating them as a TCO is very significant because it will now flag any MS-13 member crossing the border and would trigger a number of security measures that would have otherwise not been triggered,” said Bensman in an interview with CR. “This allows intelligence personnel inside the U.S. to notify cops in their internal systems who come into contact with these individuals, even if they are pulled over for a broken tail light.” While sanctuary cities will ignore a run-of-the-mill drunk driving illegal alien, it’s hard for them to ignore an alert that a person is essentially on a terror list.

The mix of drug cartels, MS-13, and Hezbollah is the ultimate threat to our homeland, much more so than Afghanistan or the civil wars in Syria and Yemen. Just this week, Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales said that 100 known terrorists were arrested in his country and deported. Remember, Guatemala is the choke point for migration to our border, and there have been hundreds of Middle Easterners caught at Laredo, Texas, this year. Also, according to ICE, 85 percent of the family units coming through the Yuma sector are from Guatemala, and we saw a record number of such incursions in September. To focus on Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, and Somalia as the terrorist threat and ignore our border is insane, especially when we bring in tens of thousands of immigrants from these countries, among them people who fund these very wars with fraud and organized crime on our own shores.

The broader lesson is that we need not discover the impossible solution to securing the sovereignty of Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Somalia to keep us safe from Islamic terrorism. We merely need to assume control of our own sovereignty through our border, immigration policy, and banking system, while working closely with our neighbors. “This is much cheaper, more effective, and doesn’t cost us lives,” said Maltz, who lost a brother in Afghanistan.

Overall, Jeff Sessions has been leading more than most other Cabinet members on discernable policy outcomes. Whether it’s crime, drugs, terrorism, immigration, religious liberty, or affirmative action, Sessions has been changing policies in the most meaningful way. He’s even pushing back against judicial supremacy. For those disappointed in the way he is handling Mueller, just remember that the Mueller probe will be over, and it would be a shame to lose all this progress for a RINO who would likely take his place. National security policy, when done right, should trump everything else. (For more from the author of “Meanwhile, Jeff Sessions Is Quietly Tackling Hezbollah and Ms-13 in Our Backyard” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Leftist to 9/11 Widow: ‘Your Husband Should F–King Rot in the Grave’

A leftist who appeared to be an Antifa protester, verbally accosted a woman during protests over the weekend in Portland, Oregon, telling her that her deceased husband should “rot in the grave.”

The incident appears to have happened on Saturday after “a conservative group organized a ‘flash march for Law and Order,'” The Washington Post reported. . .

[Video contains explicit language.]

The woman turned around and pointed at her NYPD hat, saying, “My husband died on 9/11.”

“Good for him,” the man responded. “Good, good. NYPD was a bunch of sodomizers, f–king sodomizing immigrants with their bully sticks.”

“So yeah, your husband, should probably f–king rot in the grave.” (Read more from “Leftist to 9/11 Widow: ‘Your Husband Should F–King Rot in the Grave'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Melania Trump Visits Mothers, Newborn Victims of Opioid Crisis

First Lady Melania Trump attended a conference at the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital where she met with mothers and newborn babies who have been affected by the opioid crisis. She toured the Philadelphia hospital’s intensive care unit for newborns and visited with mothers who are in the medical facility’s treatment program, according to VOA News. Jefferson has been treating patients for drug use and overdose for the past 45 years.

Trump spoke to the attendees of the conference and thanked the hospital staff for all they are doing “for this very important issue” and discussed her own “Be Best” campaign in examining the effects the crisis has on children.

“I’m grateful to the medical professionals who have been taking the time to explain their research and their impressive efforts in this field,” she said. “There are few things harder than seeing a newborn suffer and I’m anxious to do all I can to help shine a light on this epidemic.” She also praised the Trump administration for raising awareness of this issue.

Mrs. Trump continued, “As the caretakers of the next generation, it is our responsibility to protect our most valuable and vulnerable: our children.”

The first lady was briefly delayed from attending the event when her plane was forced to return to Andrews Air Force after smoke began to fill the cabin. It was later discovered to be a mechanical problem. (Read more from “Melania Trump Visits Mothers, Newborn Victims of Opioid Crisis” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Elon Musk Has Reached a Settlement, but Tesla’s Troubles Are Far From Over

A federal judge has approved a settlement between the Securities Exchange Commission and Tesla’s Elon Musk after he tweeted in August that he had secured funding to take the company private at $420 a share — a claim that proved not to be true and has cost the company and investors about $12 billion in valuation, according to MarketWatch.

U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan signed orders on Tuesday requiring Musk to step down from his role as Tesla chairman and to have a lawyer oversee and approve all tweets about Tesla to ensure he does not tweet misleading information again. The settlement also requires Musk and Telsa to pay $20 million each to investors who lost money because of Musk’s tweets. Musk still gets to retain his position as Tesla’s CEO, but Tesla’s troubles are far from over.

The SEC is reportedly still investigating the car company to determine whether they misled investors about the reason for and extent of their Model 3 production delays. In 2016, Musk predicted that “as many 200,000 Model 3s would be made in the second half of 2017,” but this was scaled back to 20,000 models. The company fell short of the reduced amount, producing a mere 2,700 cars in 2017. . .

In July, Tesla told investors it had met its goal of assembling 5,000 per week, although the company has been plagued with delivery troubles. Customers who purchased a Model 3 months ago are still waiting.

Musk claimed many of these cars have already been built, but the company is having difficulties handling the logistics of delivering them. Last month, Tesla asked volunteers to deliver cars to customers for free and walk them through some of the features, which makes one wonder if the company has the cash to deliver cars customers have already paid for. (Read more from “Elon Musk Has Reached a Settlement, but Tesla’s Troubles Are Far From Over” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Is Elizabeth Warren Guilty of Cultural Appropriation?

I have taken to these pages in the past to defend practices that progressives pejoratively call “cultural appropriation.” By now we all know the phrase and that it refers to people (mainly white people) using elements of foreign cultures including costumes, music, food, or, frankly, anything without permission. In most cases the outrage over cultural appropriation is silly, but this week Sen. Elizabeth Warren has opened herself to a charge of cultural appropriation that seems a bit more serious. Will the left hold her to account? Or will her politics earn her a pass?

We now know through Warren’s DNA test that she is about 1/1000 Native American (either from North or South America), or roughly as Native American as Chief Wahoo. During her academic career, Warren changed the identification of her race from white to Native American on the basis of family legends about an Indian ancestor.

Warren didn’t wear a headdress for Halloween or don the jersey of a certain subpar NFL team from Washington DC. She claimed to be of Indian descent to the extent that she described it as her racial identity. Whether it was her intent or not, she did so in a way that was quite likely to increase her professional opportunities. She didn’t appropriate some aspect of Indian culture; she appropriated the whole thing.

While most cases of cultural appropriation are criticized for offending actual members of the culture being appropriated, Warren’s might really have created less opportunity for actual Native Americans. Harvard University was pleased enough at having hired its first “Native American” to the faculty of its law school, and made a bit of a big deal about it. Had Warren not claimed such ancestry, might the job have gone to an actual Native American rather than a woman with about as much claim to it as an actor on “F Troop”?

That Warren thinks her DNA test exonerates her is somewhat hard to believe. Does anyone really think that, in identifying one’s race in a professional setting where it may affect hiring, being 1/1,000 of any race qualifies a person for those advantages? The whole point of those advantages, whether one agrees or disagrees with their use, is to help marginalized people overcome systemic disadvantages. Did Warren’s family legend of Indian blood disadvantage her in some way? It’s hard to see how. (Read more from “Is Elizabeth Warren Guilty of Cultural Appropriation?” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Dem Sen. Steps in It With New Sexual Assault Ad, Has to Apologize to Women Named Without Permission

The campaign of Sen. Heidi Heikamp, D-N.D., is apologizing to women named without their permission in a political ad about sexual assault and is even admitting to misidentifying one as a survivor.

A story first reported by Rob Port over at SayAnythingBlog.com details how multiple women came forward to take issue with a recent newspaper ad taken out by the Heitkamp campaign for identifying them as sexual assault survivors without their permission.

Heitkamp’s campaign responded to the complaints with a public apology and an announcement of a retraction.

The ad was in the form of an open letter to Heitkamp’s Republican opponent, Rep. Kevin Cramer, and was written in response to what Heitkamp called “dismissive comments toward sexual assault survivors.” It included the names of many “survivors,” but several women have said their names were used without their permission.

You can view the full letter here.

You may remember Rob Port from his Bulldog Award from “Michelle Malkin Investigates,” or his previous coverage of Heitkamp’s campaign. (For more from the author of “Dem Sen. Steps in It With New Sexual Assault Ad, Has to Apologize to Women Named Without Permission” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

President Trump Has Full Constitutional Power to Stop the Border Invasion – Even Without Congress

Just as President Reagan is remembered for ending the Cold War, President Trump can be remembered as the one who ended the war on our sovereignty. Will he rise to the occasion?

Here’s the stone-cold truth about our border: We could construct a border wall as high as the stratosphere, and it won’t help much if we continue our self-destructing policies of allowing bogus asylees to come through our front door and legitimizing the opinions of sanctuary judges who “make denizens of aliens.”

President Trump publicly warned the governments of Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala that if they don’t take steps to stop the latest caravan of bogus asylum invaders, he will cut off aid to the countries. While this is a good first step, it won’t deter the invasion unless we stop admitting the invaders and implementing catch-and-release under orders from illegitimate court rulings, as we did with the previous caravan and countless tens of thousands of others coming in with less pomp. And that would hold true even with a border wall. They just come to our points of entry, surrender themselves, get released into our communities, and never show up to their hearings until and unless they wind up committing crimes.

Moreover, the caravan is already in Guatemala and headed for Mexico. Thus, the Honduran diplomacy is moot at this point. And this is much bigger than one caravan. We must first dissect what is actually happening at our border.

This is nothing short of an invasion

Earlier this week, KTAR news in Phoenix, Arizona, sat down with ICE’s Phoenix field director, Henry Lucero. What he revealed should disturb all of us:

Only two percent of family units released from custody are ever deported. And there are a lot of families. In fiscal year 2017, roughly 13,000 came through the Yuma Sector. This year’s final numbers will likely show double that number. Freeze-frame right there. This is the magnet. Until this policy stops, the border invasion will not cease.

85 percent of the recent families are from Guatemala, and they ask for asylum while surrendering themselves to border agents. They are not even attempting to smuggle themselves in between the points of entry. Thus, a wall will not help if we continue to allow this because they just come to the points of entry. As Lucero said, “On the news in Guatemala they are saying that you can get a work permit if you’re in a family, if you’re coming with your child, and that you’re going to be released.”

Border agents interviewed by KTAR said that resources designed to protect our national security are now being used to aid and treat illegal aliens in distress. This, in a nutshell, is why the gang and drug crisis spiked to unprecedented levels beginning with the Central American migration in 2014. Officials said that 95 percent of those caught in Arizona go to the East Coast, which explains why places like Long Island are the hardest hit from the gang and drug crises.

Thus, it all boils down to bogus asylum and catch-and-release. Either Trump ends those, or everything else is just talk. While Trump is right to ask Congress to step in, we’ve noted before that our statute is already clear that these people do not qualify as asylees and that the unaccompanied teenagers do not qualify as refugees.

With this background in mind, it’s easy to understand why Lindsey Grahmanesty’s idea of trading amnesty for a border wall is so counterintuitive. We only have this border invasion because of the magnet of amnesty, and the magnet of amnesty allows them to come to the entry points, demand asylum, sue for rights, and never get deported. A wall only helps a country that has a strong spirit but a weak frontier; it doesn’t help a weak political system that willingly commits national suicide.

Anyone who tells you that the president doesn’t have the authority to exclude anyone for any reason doesn’t deserve to live in a sovereign nation. Sovereignty trumps everything. There is nothing in our statutes that forces the president to admit anyone he feels is a problem. In fact, as we’ve noted before, he has inherent executive powers from Article II, as well as delegated authority from Congress under existing law, to stop taking in immigrants at the border or through visas for as much time as he deems necessary.

Here’s a quick review.

Inherent executive authority

While Congress controls immigration once immigrants are legally admitted to our country and can also exclude anyone from admission, the president shares concurrent jurisdiction on exclusions. He can’t deport anyone he wants to without an authorizing statue, but he can exclude anyone up front. As the Supreme Court said in a landmark 1950 case, “The exclusion of aliens is a fundamental act of sovereignty. The right to do so stems not alone from legislative power but is inherent in the executive power to control the foreign affairs of the nation.” This is why for the first 100 years of our country, immigration was entirely controlled by diplomatic correspondence through the State Department. The president was clearly using this authority when communicating with the leader of the country of origin of this caravan.

Trump can simply shut the door and demand that any legitimate asylum claims be processed through our 10 or so consulates in Mexico.

Finally, the president needs to threaten not just Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador, but Mexico with diplomatic sanctions. As Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, told me in email, “The president should be leaning on Mexico and the sending nations that their facilitation of this problem is immoral, shameful, and will adversely affect our bilateral relationship.”

“He should consider visa sanctions if they are not cooperative in arranging the swift return of those apprehended. He should suspend certain foreign aid until we gain their cooperation. There almost certainly are other forms of leverage that will get their attention.”

One such point of leverage would be NAFTA negotiations. The top issue should not be trade, but immigration. Mexico badly wants a renewal, and having it agree to process asylum claims in our consulates rather than sending them to our border would go a long way.

Along with threatening to cut off aid, he should fund a massive Spanish-language media campaign in these countries to make it clear they can never obtain legal status unless they apply through a consulate.

Delegated authority from Congress

INA 212(f) allows the president, whenever he finds that “the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States,” to “suspend” all forms of immigration “for such period as he shall deem necessary.” INA 215(a)(1) grants the president an almost equal level of authority to subject entry of all aliens entering or departing to “such reasonable rules, regulations, and orders, and subject to such limitations and exceptions as the President may prescribe.” If demanding that all immigrants enter legally or apply for asylum in a safe and controlled environment at a consulate rather than at a border controlled by some of the most dangerous people in the world is not a “reasonable rule,” I’m not sure what is.

In addition, given that this is not an ordinary case of immigration or a trickle of asylum seekers, but rather a mass influx, the attorney general can use 8 U.S.C. § 1103(a)(10) to deputize local law enforcement bodies at the border that wish to participate to engage in the police powers of federal immigration officers. This section of the law states that when there’s an “imminent mass influx of aliens arriving off the coast of the United States, or near a land border,” the attorney general may “authorize any State or local law enforcement officer” to perform such duties. This will help with the manpower and the national security component of the issue.

The bottom line is that we need to repel the invasion, not manage it. Why are border agents automatically handing over these people to ICE to be processed? Jessica Vaughan told me she is concerned this is depleting ICE’s resources to address interior enforcement when Customs and Border Protection should be leading at the border. “It’s time for CBP to step up and assume some more responsibility for addressing this crisis,” wrote Vaughan in an email. “So far, they have been just handing over the problem to ICE, USCIS, and the immigration courts, as if it’s not CBP’s problem. That has depleted and diverted the resources for those other critical agencies, which have other responsibilities in the interior. The president should direct CBP – the border protection agency — to assume responsibility for managing the swift processing of these cases, in cooperation with the other agencies of course.”

This is why Trump was elected. Period

This is Trump’s legacy at stake. This is his time in history. He can be the one to stop the border invasion. The minute he forces a national debate over whether we are a sovereign nation, he gains more leverage. The minute he threatens to veto the next budget bill unless it makes changes to sanctuary cities and asylum policies, the tables will be turned. And the minute he actually uses his inherent executive and delegated authority to shut this down temporarily without Congress, he has much more leverage to push long-term reforms as well as deterring Central Americans. (For more from the author of “President Trump Has Full Constitutional Power to Stop the Border Invasion – Even Without Congress” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.