Islamists Attack Relief Centers for Violating Ramadan Fast

Armed Islamists stormed a heatstroke center in Pakistan on Thursday and forced them to shut down for allegedly violating fasting hours during the ongoing month of Ramadan, the holiest period for Muslims.

The Islamist assault in the city of Sukkur on Thursday forced a total of five water outlets in the Pakistani province of Sindh to close amid a heatwave, Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper reveals. Citing the social welfare organization known as the Edhi Foundation, Reuters reports that the heat has already killed at least 65 people in Sindh.

The armed Islamists reportedly fired in the air at one of the water outlets in the city of Sukkur in Sindh, prompting operators to flee.

In response, local authorities appear to have capitulated to the armed activists’ demands, advising the facility operators to shut down a total of five heat stroke centers in Sukkur despite the ongoing heatwave. . .

According to Dawn, the Ayub Gate center is one of many facilities set up by the Sukkur Municipal Corporation (SMC) “to provide immediate relief to victims of heatstroke as the maximum temperatures in certain upper Sindh areas in recent days remained between 40 [104 Fahrenheit] and 47 [117 Fahrenheit] degrees Celsius.” (Read more from “Islamists Attack Relief Centers for Violating Ramadan Fast” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

She Accused Him of Rape. The Charges Were Dropped When She Realized She FORGOT She Gave Consent.

The couple met at a church event years before this alleged incident, The Daily Mail reported, and had sex on occasion throughout those years. On October 8, 2017, the woman invited the man over to her home after the two had a fight earlier that day. The man came over and the two had consensual sex. The next day, however, she called police and said the man had raped her.

The charges were finally dropped against the man, who will not be named by The Daily Wire, because the woman simply “forgot” she had invited him.

Crown Prosecutor Matthew Hynes withdrew the charges and told an Australian court that the woman suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and had a personality disorder. He said these disorders would lead the woman to engage in “incidences with men, whereby consensual sex can occur, she can transplant previous memories on to that.”

“She has a high-functioning alcoholism issue whereby she consumes a fair bit of alcohol every day, and that plays a part into her mental health and her mind and state and perception of things,” Hynes added. “It also plays a part in why she might forget things at times.” . . .

This is what happens when we live in the era of #MeToo, where every accusation, no matter how thin or what the woman’s circumstances are, must be believed and every accused man must be taken through the system. This man was charged with rape because a mentally ill woman forgot she consented. (Read more from “She Accused Him of Rape. The Charges Were Dropped When She Realized She FORGOT She Gave Consent.” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Dems Going After Major First Amendment SCOTUS Decision

This week, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) resuscitated an old Democratic Party political enemy: The First Amendment-affirming 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. In Citizens United, the Court held that the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment generally prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for communications by corporations, labor unions, and other similarly situated associations. The relevant statute, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, had prohibited any corporation from making an “electioneering communication” within 30 days of a primary election or within 60 days of a general election. The Citizens United decision, although well-grounded in the original understanding of the political speech-centric Free Speech Clause, has consistently been lambasted by the Left ever since it was handed down. Many on the Left criticize the “dark money” from corporations that the decision has allegedly allowed to flow out in the open.

Now, Schiff wants to bring back an effort to overturn the decision via constitutional amendment. CNN reports:

Rep. Adam Schiff on Wednesday introduced a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which helped usher in a new era of big money in American elections.

“Our democracy is not for sale. We must stop the flood of dark money from drowning out the voices of everyday citizens,” the California Democrat said in a statement on Twitter. He said such an amendment would “restore power to the American people.”

By a 5-4 ruling, the high court in 2010 swept aside a ban on independent spending by corporations and unions in candidate elections, saying the restrictions amounted to censorship. Outside spending in federal elections has soared from $338 million in 2008, the last presidential election before the ruling, to $1.4 billion in 2016, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

(Read more from “Dems Going After Major First Amendment SCOTUS Decision” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

WATCH: Violent Assault on Pro-Lifer at U.S. College

Video has recently surfaced depicting a violent assault on the campus of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill last month. The video shows a female student attacking a young man after she apparently became angry over anti-abortion signage, according to a report by Campus Reform.

The young man, Austin Beigel, is an intern with the pro-life group Created Equal. Biegel said in a Facebook post that he was attacked while “peacefully talking to students about abortion,” adding that “violence from abortion supporters is becoming more common.” . . .

[Video contains explicit language:]

Created Equal was reportedly on the UNC campus in order to display “large signs depicting the gruesome reality of abortion” and engage in conversations with students on April 2, a Tuesday press release from the group said. The appearance was part of a bigger tour across 14 college campuses, located in three different states.

“Footage of the outburst begins with a woman asking our team, ‘Did you put these [signs] up?’” the press release stated, according to The Daily Caller News Foundation. “When they respond affirmatively, she proceeds to repeatedly punch and kick a member of our staff.” . . .

Created Equal President Mark Harrington reportedly said Tuesday that the university had still not reached out to the group, but that police had charged the assailant with non-aggravated assault. Campus Reform was not able to independently confirm those charges with the UNC police. (Read more from “WATCH: Violent Assault on Pro-Lifer at Chapel Hill” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Ocasio-Cortez Has a New Target: ‘Moderate’ Joe Biden

Hey Joe, what do ya know? Apparently not much when it comes to fighting against global warming, according to Democratic Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The freshman Congresswoman and leader on the socialistic style Green New Deal tweeted her disgust after sources revealed a part of Joe Biden’s plan to combat climate change, saying the Vice President displayed a “lack of leadership” with his potential “middle ground” proposal.

According to Reuters, “[t]he backbone of the policy will likely include the United States re-joining the Paris Climate Agreement and preserving U.S. regulations on emissions and vehicle fuel efficiency that Trump has sought to undo, according to one of the sources, Heather Zichal, who is part of a team advising Biden on climate change. She previously advised President Barack Obama.”

Reuters source also said that “the policy could also be supportive of nuclear energy and fossil fuel options like natural gas and carbon capture technology, which limit emissions from coal plants and other industrial facilities.”

In response, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez said, “This is a dealbreaker. There is no ‘middle ground’ w/ climate denial & delay. Blaming ‘blue collar’ Americans as the main opponents to bold climate policy is gas lobbyist 101.” . . .

This is Rep. Ocasio-Cortez’s first comments about a specific candidate in the 2020 race and could spell trouble for the current front runner of the Democratic primary campaign. (Read more from “Ocasio-Cortez Has a New Target: ‘Moderate’ Joe Biden” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Pentagon Approves More Funds for Border Wall

By Townhall. Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan has approved an additional $1.5 billion to build 80 more miles of President Trump’s border wall.

. . .

(Read more from “Pentagon Approves More Funds for Border Wall” HERE)

___________________________________________________

Pentagon Approves Plan to Shift $1.5B for Wall Along U.S.-Mexico Border

By Fox News. The Pentagon has approved a plan to spend an additional $1.5 billion to build 80 more miles of wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, a U.S. defense official confirmed to Fox News Friday.

Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan approved the re-allocation of funds, which were originally earmarked for support of Afghan security forces and other projects, to help pay for the wall along the southern border. . .

In March, Shanahan approved the first transfer of Defense Department dollars and redirected $1 billion to help build nearly 60 miles of wall in Yuma, Ariz. and El Paso, Texas.

The combined total of $2.5 billion is in response to President Trump’s declaration of a national emergency at the border.

But the plan to divert Pentagon funding has sparked criticism from congressional Democrats, who accused Shanahan of not seeking approval to “reprogram” the funds without congressional authority. Shanahan and other senior defense officials claimed in response they did not have to get permission from Congress despite the objections from Democratic lawmakers. (Read more from “Pentagon Approves Plan to Shift $1.5B for Wall Along U.S.-Mexico Border” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

‘Profound Scientist’ Bernie Sanders and Torturous Wind Turbines

Bernie Sanders has a lot of nerve mocking the president for an offhand remark about wind turbines. Especially since he defends the monstrosities that are torturing rural landowners.

During a long and jovial appearance in front of a friendly audience at the National Republican Congressional Committee’s annual spring dinner, President Trump said that wind turbines cause property values to go down and continued, “And they say the noise causes cancer.”

Bernie Sanders pounced on that offhand comment and mocked Trump, saying, “And he’s a profound scientist, someone who’s researched the issue for years and uniquely came up with that conclusion,” Sanders said.

But you know, you don’t have to research the issue for many years to come up with the conclusion that wind turbines are slowly torturing rural folks, and in some instances, the sleep deprivation and stress can in fact lead people down a path of poor health.

In a piece published in the Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, Carl V. Phillips has indeed concluded, “There is overwhelming evidence that wind turbines cause serious health problems in nearby residents, usually stress-disorder-type diseases, at a nontrivial rate.”

Optical flickering, caused when the blades pass through sunlight, and noises both audible and nonaudible have led people to abandon their homes or demand recompense for the pains they have to live with even after they were assured by lying wind energy proponents that these things would not happen.

Phillips highlighted three particular accounts from people who live close to the turbines, including the account of a five-year-old who could not sleep due to the exposure to the noise and became defiant and irritable. His issues were destroying his school life. Once the family abandoned their home, the boy recovered.

The account described the constant noise:

They are loud. They’ve been compared to jet engines, a plane that will not take off. There is no gentle swoosh, it is a whoosh noise. They grind, they bang, they creak. The noise is like surround sound, it’s omnidirectional.

In another account, a woman explained how she has developed tinnitus and a slew of other health problems due to the audible and nonaudible sounds the turbines made. She noted how many homeowners had to abandon their homes to get some peace. Her account is not unusual, telling of the nonaudible sounds that shake parts of the house and are in no way rhythmic, adding to sleep deprivation and sensitivity to movement and noise.

The noise is constant, some days louder than others. It is not noise I enjoy or choose to be around. It is noise I cannot escape. I live with the movement of shadow flicker created by the rotation of the turbines, coming through my dining room window as I drink my coffee in the morning. I have developed a sensitivity in which now I cannot even tolerate the movement of a small ceiling fan. The skies where I live are no longer clear but dotted with blinking red lights marking the height of the turbines. When the turbines are down, a constant buzzing noise is emitted from the motionless structures. I have developed tinnitus in my ears. I hear and feel the pulsating of the turbines and buzzing in my ears. I also feel the pulsating in my throat and chest.

Yet another man attributes his ailments to the fact that his property abuts property with turbines on it. It is not only the people who accept the turbines on their property, but their neighbors who suffer too. The man in the third account created a list of all the ailments he has, well documented by health professionals, that he attests are due to the wind turbines.

anxiety

stress

nervousness

sleep deprivation

hypertension

migraines

dizziness

blurred vision

palpitations

irritability

anger

upset stomach

depression

Here’s a good example of the banging and creaking, captured by Ed Sliwinsky of New York.

Now why are we allowing proponents of wind power to lie to rural people about the side effects of allowing wind turbines near their property? People like Bernie Sanders don’t seem to care one iota about the loss of lifestyle and health due to these monstrosities.

By the way, did Sanders ever mention that Vermonters have had it with these monstrosities? Too late to stop them, but they are fighting them now all the way because they can see the cost.

They have watched as time and time again, turbine proponents come through small rural areas, waving tax dollars around to impress the county commissioners, and lying through their teeth about the noise and health costs to anyone within a mile or two of the behemoths. Once the commissioners okay everything, there is no turning back.

Is sleep deprivation a type of torture? How about loud noise? How would you like to live near an airport where jet engines constantly run but never take off? And you were there first! These turbines are being sold to the public under falsehoods, just so politicians can feel good about “doing something for the environment.” Human beings are part of the environment, and somehow, our health problems are the subject now of mockery by socialists who wish to rule this nation. (For more from the author of “‘Profound Scientist’ Bernie Sanders and Torturous Wind Turbines” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump Fires First Shot in U.S.-China Trade War

The trade war begins: Trump hikes tariffs on China

The Trump administration has officially imposed tariffs on roughly $200 billion worth of Chinese goods.

Tariffs on the select Chinese exports were raised from 10 percent to 25 percent overnight, resulting in a plummeting stock market and a promise from Beijing to impose retaliatory tariffs of its own.

“China deeply regrets that the US has decided to increase the tariffs from 10 per cent to 25 per cent on US$200 billion worth of China goods exported to the United States,” China’s Ministry of Commerce said in a statement following the tariff hike.

“We’ll have no choice but to take the necessary countermeasures,” the statement added.

President Trump took to Twitter Friday to signal that he may leave the tariffs in place for quite some time.

“Talks with China continue in a very congenial manner – there is absolutely no need to rush,” the president said in one of his tweets.

North Korea again commences missile tests following long hiatus

The regime that rules North Korea has started to test-fire short-range missiles, following relative calm through the course of the Trump administration.

On Thursday, the South Korean military reported seeing Pyongyang test-firing projectiles into the sea, marking a significant escalation from a regime that was once in discussions about denuclearization.

North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un has pledged to keep his military in “full-combat posture,” according to North Korean state media, which released photos of Kim watching the military exercises that occurred this week.

President Trump was not particularly amused with the North Korean saber-rattling, but remained open to further negotiations.

“They were smaller missiles, they’re short range missiles,” President Trump told reporters. “Nobody’s happy about it, but we’re taking a good look and we’ll see, we’ll see. The relationship continues, but we’ll see what happens.”

Guaido says he would ‘probably accept’ US military intervention in Venezuela

Venezuela opposition leader or interim president, depending upon your politics and views on the situation unfolding in Caracas, Juan Guaido continues to consider the possibility of American military intervention in his country.

In an interview with the Italian publication La Stampa, Guaido said he would “probably accept” U.S. military intervention intended to topple socialist dictator Nicolas Maduro.

“If the Americans were to propose a military intervention I would probably accept it,” Guaido said, according to a translation by The Telegraph.

Iranian regime offers cold response to POTUS’ ‘call me’ outreach

The regime that rules Iran is thoroughly rejecting any notion of diplomacy with the United States, following President Trump’s offer to negotiate with the mullahs this week.

“There will be no negotiations with America,” a top Iranian general raged, according to one of its state-run media outfits, Fox News reported Friday.

Trump said Thursday at the White House, commenting on the newly imposed sanctions against the Tehran regime: “What I would like to see with Iran, I would like to see them call me.”

The Trump administration has sent some serious firepower to maintain a presence off of Iran’s coast, following reported U.S. intelligence picking up information on a terrorist threat originating from Iran and its terrorist proxies.

Sec. Pompeo to meet with Putin in Russia next week

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will meet face to face with Russian President Vladimir Putin next week in Sochi, Russia, the State Department said in a press release Friday.

While in Sochi, he will also meet with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. The parties will discuss “the full range of bilateral and multilateral challenges,” the State Department said.

Secretary Pompeo will also lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Russia. The landmark commemorates the Soviet soldiers who perished during World War II, when the U.S. and Soviet Union struck an alliance to defeat Nazi Germany. (For more from the author of “Trump Fires First Shot in U.S.-China Trade War” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump Is Right to Oppose More ‘Disaster’ or Puerto Rico Spending – It’s Bloated Pork

If Republicans merely got through their tenures without increasing net spending, it would be an unprecedented victory. Thankfully, President Trump is finally putting his foot down on yet another $17.3 billion disaster package winding its way through Congress.

In April, Republicans were ready to throw another $13.5 billion in disaster aid at the gods of political pork. Thankfully, they were stopped by the intransigence of the Left. Democrats felt that the $600 million earmarked for nutrition assistance for Puerto Rico wasn’t enough, even though they have already appropriated $40 billion in disaster aid and Puerto Rico has already received a quasi-bailout for its culture of debt.

But given how sensitive Republicans are to the identity politics inherent in squabbles over funding for Puerto Rico, they were on their way to pursuing their favorite pastime – caving to the Democrats on their spending demands – until President Trump stepped in and demanded an end to all new aid for the mismanaged island.

Today, House Democrats will vote on their $17.3 billion version (H.R. 2157) of disaster aid in the face of the looming veto threat from the president. While it’s not news that Democrats will pass this bill, what should be alarming is that Senate Republicans are planning to follow suit. Republicans continue to move to the Democrat position, begging them to accept even more money for Puerto Rico rather than holding their ground.

Agreeing to the entire premise of the Democrats that Puerto Rico is a national emergency instead of our border, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said yesterday, “We’re open to additional Puerto Rican assistance” and, “We need to pass it out of the Senate before the Memorial Day recess.”

Here’s the reality. Under regular spending, all of the relevant agencies and departments receiving funding under this supplemental spending bill, particularly the Department of Transportation and HUD, have record high budgets thanks to huge spending over the past few years. Spending is now 13.7 percent higher than under Obama’s final year, and that is with the economy doing much better. On top of that, over the past few years, Congress already passed $117.5 billion in disaster spending in 2017 and included numerous disaster relief provisions in the appropriations bills of the past two fiscal years.

Additionally, much of the disaster aid has nothing to do with immediate emergency needs, but with filling the already bloated coffers of liberal HUD and Department of Agriculture programs. Much as with any package that is titled “children,” any bill titled “disaster relief” is beyond reproach, circumspection, or any verification of the need for each line item. Given that so much money has already been appropriated, no new funds should be appropriated in a rush without any oversight unless they are clearly urgent needs, not long-term policies.

This bill throws more money at the Community Development Block Grant program. The CDBG has long been a wasteful welfare program for low-income housing assistance and other local parochial projects that should have been shouldered by local governments long before any natural disasters hit. Trump’s OMB suggested eliminating it altogether, and even the Obama administration proposed cuts in fiscal year 2012 because, in their words, the program lacked a “focused impact,” making “the demonstration of outcomes difficult to measure and evaluate.” But the hurricanes provided liberals with a good opportunity for those always looking to expand this program to do so under the veneer of emergency spending, even though Congress already grew its budget by 88 percent in the budget deal last year.

While this bill covers long-term spending, not just emergency needs, it doesn’t offer long-term reforms that should accompany any immediate bailouts. Congress already enacted yet another $16 billion bailout of the flood insurance program without any desire to reform the government’s monopoly over flood insurance that has induced people to build in flood zones in the first place. This bill contains yet another extension of the program.

Perhaps the most egregious element is another $3 billion thrown at farm aid. Congress just passed a $900 billion farm bill in December, doubling down on massive subsidies for corporate farms and landowners who aren’t even farmers, while guaranteeing all protection from even “shallow loss” of revenue. This is the problem with Congress’ modus operandi of double- and triple-dipping. They embed endless individual and corporate welfare into the regular appropriations bills and then step on the gas pedal to raise the spending levels as quickly as possible. Then, when there is a disaster, they come back for more in supplemental disaster bills, as if they never spent money on these very programs before.

Then there is the issue of Puerto Rico. It’s terribly tragic that it was pummeled with a direct hit from Hurricane Maria, resulting in the death of thousands of island residents. But the hurricane was not the primary driver of Puerto Rico’s economic problems. The desire for more funding beyond the existing $40 billion aid package is coming more from the long-term fallout of its Venezuela-like Marxist economic system than from the immediate effects of the hurricane.

Puerto Rico managed to rack up more debt than its economic output long before Hurricane Maria. A huge 43 percent of its residents received food stamps long before Hurricane Maria. And 26 percent of Puerto Rican workers were employed by government and also receiving 30 days of vacation long before Hurricane Maria.

The bottom line is that there is no reason why the American people should be on the hook for throwing good money after bad money before Puerto Rico cleans up the systemic government corruption and socialism that existed before the natural disasters. Ideally, Puerto Rico should be given its independence, so it can prosper without any interference but also not rely on American welfare like a security blanket.

In the meantime, Congress should help Puerto Rico by repealing the 1920 Jones Act, which requires ships sailing within the United States to be built, owned, and managed by U.S. companies. It has hampered trade and imports for Puerto Rico by often doubling the cost of shipping.

Finally, there is the issue of the border. The true emergency we have is the invasion at our border, and neither party in Congress cares much about it. Not only does this bill fail to deal with that crisis, it explicitly bars the use of any defense funding for the border. Certainly, the GOP’s competing bill in the Senate will not contain this provision, but nor will Republicans push any legislation to fix the crisis by hiring more ICE agents, building more border infrastructure, or punishing sanctuary cities. Why is there no hell-fire rush from Mitch McConnell to treat that issue as a “must pass” before Memorial Day?

Many conservatives were concerned that President Trump would make the GOP the party of big spending. Turns out, for someone who is not known as a fiscal conservative, he sure is willing to cut spending more than GOP leaders in Congress. (For more from the author of “Trump Is Right to Oppose More ‘Disaster’ or Puerto Rico Spending – It’s Bloated Pork” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

House Conservatives Sign Letter Urging Pelosi Not to Blow out out Spending Limits in New Budget

Several Republican members of the House of Representatives are urging speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to take a “modest” step toward controlling the national debt by sticking to Congress’ current spending limits.

“As you know, our nation recently surpassed $22 trillion in debt,” explains the letter spearheaded by Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, and signed by dozens of other members. “With every hour that passes, we add $100 million to that figure. That is unconscionable. That must end.”

The letter goes on to point out that, even at current spending levels with the same currently low interest rates, “spending on interest alone will surpass defense spending within 5 years.” It also points out that Medicare and Social Security are slated to run out of money in the next few years.

“The good news is that current law is on our side to restrain spending,” the letter continues. “Congress should hold overall spending to the caps levels already in place while ensuring our men and women in uniform have the tools necessary to do their job. Doing so would be a modest step on a path towards balancing the budget.”

The Budget Control Act of 2011 is another example of Washington D.C.’s seemingly never-ending, debt-increasing budgetary pageantry.

As a Congressional Research Service report explains, the BCA was originally passed with enforcement mechanisms to control spending and the debt. However, raising spending limits and the debt ceiling have pretty much become regular occurrences on Capitol Hill.

Roy recently called out efforts by Congressional leadership to raise the debt limit, saying, “Only in Washington is it considered appropriate to endlessly lift one’s borrowing limit without even a hint of shame or a plan to stop it.”

“If we can’t at least agree to stick to the [spending] caps, we will cease to be the ‘land of opportunity,’ where one’s circumstances at birth needn’t define one’s life trajectory,” the new letter concludes. “Hold to the caps, budget like American families do every day, and let’s work on a bipartisan basis to ensure a bright future for our sons and daughters.”

Current signatories include Reps. Jim Jordan, Ohio; Mark Meadows, N.C.; Andy Biggs, Ariz.; Louie Gohmert, Texas; Ken Buck, Colo.; Thomas Massie, Ky.; Justin Amash, Mich.; Jeff Duncan, S.C.; and Warren Davidson, Ohio.

The letter will be sent to the speaker’s office on Friday, a press release explains, and Roy’s office will continue to collect signatures until it is sent over. (For more from the author of “House Conservatives Sign Letter Urging Pelosi Not to Blow out out Spending Limits in New Budget” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE