Well, Christopher Steele, Department of Justice investigators interviewed the ex-MI6 spy who compiled the infamous Trump dossier. That document, a Clinton-funded piece of political opposition research, was one of the key pieces of so-called evidence that was used to fan the flames of the Russian collusion myth. The dossier’s credibility was immediately questioned, as a large portion of the information in it couldn’t be verified. In fact, most of it remains unverified. It doesn’t matter. The report filed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller debunked all of it. Trump and his campaign team didn’t collude with the Russians. There was no conspiracy. . .
Steele had previously refused to cooperate, but only recently agreed to be interviewed by investigators with the DOJ inspector general’s office who are investigating the alleged FISA abuses during the 2016 campaign. This certainly put a delay on whatever deadline this office put on the report, which has some Democrats and former Obama intelligence chiefs a bit nervous and for good reason (via NYT):
. . .During a congressional deposition last fall, Representative Jim Jordan, Republican of Ohio and a Trump ally, asked Mr. Baker why he took the unusual step of personally reviewing the original warrant application.
“I anticipated being — sitting here in rooms like this down the road, I seriously did, and I knew that it was — I knew that it was sensitive,” Mr. Baker replied, according to a transcript. “I knew that it would be controversial.”
LOL at anyone who pretended to be an intelligence expert while getting duped by conman Christopher Steele. https://t.co/uDBxVxiYFM
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) July 9, 2019
This would at least explain the long IG delay. The story weirdly suggests delay is because IG wanted Steele info. Would seem equally likely that IG is investigating Steele's very credibility.
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) July 9, 2019
(Read more from “Obama DOJ Officials Knew Their Spy Warrant for Trump Official Would Be Controversial and Second-Guessed” HERE)