Teenager Suspended From School for Selling Squirts of Hand Sanitizer

Hand sanitizer is now the hottest item on the market because of coronavirus. Even in the United States, where the outbreak is relatively new, you might have trouble finding any on the shelves of most major stores.

In the United Kingdom, one teenager decided to try to capitalize on that demand by selling squirts of hand sanitizer to his classmates — and he got suspended for it.

The teenager was sent home after selling hand sanitizer for about $0.64 per squirt, and he made around $11 before his business was shut down. His mother posted about the incident on Facebook.

“Well the little turd has just been expelled from school for the day after been caught charging students 50p a squirt for hand sanitiser to protect themselfs from the bloody corona virus!!” Jenny Tompkins posted. “Very hard to discipline this behaviour when his dad phones him from work to call him a f***ing legend.” . . .

Tompkins said her son used the money to buy a multipack of Doritos and was going to buy a kebab later. (Read more from “Teenager Suspended From School for Selling Squirts of Hand Sanitizer” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Airstrikes Underway in Iraq in Retaliation for Attack That Killed 2 U.S. Troops (VIDEO)

The United States responded to an attack that killed two US soldiers with airstrikes against numerous targets in Iraq on Thursday.

Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin reported that military sources told her the airstrikes were concentrated on Iranian-backed Shia militias.

The attack on coalition forces at Camp Taji on Wednesday was suspected to be coordinated by Iranian-backed militias. In addition to the US fatalities, a British service member was also killed in the attack that included as many as 30 rockets.

The attack also injured another dozen service members.

Iran had previously launched attacks against US forces in January as retaliation for the drone strike that killed Iranian military leader Qassem Soleimani near Baghdad airport.

(Read more from “Airstrikes Underway in Iraq in Retaliation for Attack That Killed 2 U.S. Troops” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

CDC Developing Serologic Tests That Could Reveal Full Scope of U.S. Coronavirus Outbreak

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is developing tests that could provide public health officials crucial information about how broadly the coronavirus has spread in the United States, even among mild cases or people without symptoms, the agency’s director said Wednesday.

The serologic tests, which are different from the ones used to diagnose active infection, would allow researchers to test the blood of people who were not confirmed cases of Covid-19 in communities where the virus spread. They would be designed to look for signs that people have mounted an immune response after being exposed to the virus.

CDC Director Robert Redfield told Congress that the agency is working on two of these types of tests. “CDC has developed two serological tests that we’re evaluating right now so we can get an idea through surveillance what’s the extent of this outbreak, how many people really are infected,” he told a House panel. “That is being moved out now to do these extensive surveillance programs.”

Understanding the full scope of an outbreak would allow authorities to learn more about how the virus spreads. It would also provide a more accurate picture of the so-called infection fatality ratio, or, in layman’s terms, the percentage of cases that are fatal. The figure is arrived at by taking the number of deaths and dividing that by the number of cases, so if many thousands of cases are not accounted for, it can make a disease appear more lethal than it actually is.

Researchers in China and Singapore have also developed serologic tests and have initiated these types of studies, according to the World Health Organization. The agency has called on all countries with cases to conduct this kind of epidemiological work. (Read more from “CDC Developing Serologic Tests That Could Reveal Full Scope of U.S. Coronavirus Outbreak” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Smallest Dinosaur Found Trapped in Amber (VIDEO)

The bird-like skull of a tiny new species of dinosaur has been discovered trapped in amber at an archaeological site in northern Myanmar. Scientists say the fossil find represents the smallest dinosaur from the Mesozoic era to date and its diminutive size makes it smaller than the smallest living bird found on Earth today.

“When I first saw this specimen it just blew my mind,” Jingmai O’Connor, a paleontologist with the Chinese Academy of Sciences and co-author on the paper, said in a Nature video. “I had literally never seen anything like this.”

The skull is estimated to be nearly 100 million years old, according to details of the remarkable find published Wednesday in the journal Nature. The find measures just over 15 millimeters in length, around the same size as the diameter of a US penny. Analysis of the skeletal features suggest the tiny creature was mature, had really big eyes and a lot of tiny teeth. For that reason, the new species has been given the scientific name of “Oculudentavis khaungraae” with the generic name “Oculudentavis” derived from the Latin for “eye-teeth-bird”. Its species name relates to the person responsible for donating the specimen.

To study the skull, the team ran the amber specimen through a specialized scanner that can determine features down to millimeter scales and generate a 3D reconstruction of the skull. Using the reconstruction allowed the team to infer how Oculudentavis may have lived and its eating habits. The reinforced skull also suggests it may have had a stronger bite than similar size species and likely fed on small insects. (Read more from “Smallest Dinosaur Found Trapped in Amber” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Coronavirus Was Just Labeled a ‘Pandemic,’ but Don’t Panic. Here’s Why.; 40 Deaths in U.S., Disney Parks to Close

By PJ Media. The World Health Organization just announced that there are enough cases of COVID-19 (coronavirus) to declare a global pandemic. . .

This is what Science News describes as a pandemic:

According to the World Health Organization, a pandemic is the worldwide spread of a new disease. It’s most often used in reference to influenza, and generally connotes that an epidemic has spread to two or more continents with sustained, person-to-person transmission.

The severity of illness doesn’t fall under the WHO’s strict definition of a pandemic — just the disease’s spread — though the WHO may take the overall burden of the disease into account before declaring a pandemic. As the top global health agency, the WHO is relied upon to be the first to make the pandemic declaration.

(Read more from “Coronavirus Was Just Labeled a ‘Pandemic,’ but Don’t Panic. Here’s Why.” HERE)

_______________________________________________

40 Deaths in U.S., Disney Parks to Close

By ABC News. At least 1,663 cases of novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, have been confirmed in the United States Thursday as more events are canceled across the country.

Forty people have died in the U.S. At least 45 states, plus Washington, D.C., have confirmed cases.

Globally, there have been over 127,000 confirmed cases with over 4,700 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering. . .

The Walt Disney Company announced that it would close Walt Disney World Resort in Orlando, Florida, and Disneyland Paris would shut down on Sunday. . .

Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly said Thursday a 70-year-old man was the first coronavirus fatality in the state. (Read more from “40 Deaths in U.S., Disney Parks to Close” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

A Helpful Timeline on U.S. #Coronavirus Response

Maybe this list will help Marxists, progressives and other anti-American Democrats understand what President Trump was doing while the entire Democrat Congressional body was focused on… impeachment.

Democrats are a party focused on putting ideology above country. Every. single. time. (For more from the author of “A Helpful Timeline on U.S. #Coronavirus Response” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Air Travel From Europe to U.S. to Shut Down Over Coronavirus. but What About Our Southern Border?

Our entire nation dodged a bullet late yesterday when the Supreme Court stayed a Ninth Circuit injunction that would have caused a mass rush of caravans at our border. But had SCOTUS declined to intervene, would our government really have opened our borders during an official global pandemic just because of an illegal lower court opinion?

Here’s a rule of thumb: If the fallout from a court ruling requires the president to send troops to an international border to stem the tide of foreign nationals rushing in, that is clearly an issue over which the court has no jurisdiction.

Last Friday, following the Ninth Circuit’s announced injunction on the DHS’ “remain in Mexico” policy, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced the deployment of 160 troops to the border. According to the press release, CBP would deploy 80 active-duty troops to San Diego’s San Ysidro border crossing and 80 to El Paso’s Paso del Norte bridge to assist agents with repelling a potential rush at the border. Warning of the “amassment of large groups in Mexico with the potential to forcibly enter the United States,” the statement said the troops would provide “military police support, engineer, and aviation support” to the customs agents manning those two ports.

According to local news in Texas, the troops have already arrived in El Paso.

This is all because of one circuit court that believes judges, not the political branches, get to decide who comes into the country, contrary to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. Hawaii. The court would have re-implemented its injunction on Wednesday if not for the intervention of the Supreme Court hours before the injunction was to take effect.

It’s self-evident that there is an eager crowd of illegal aliens waiting to rush the border in anticipation of these court rulings. It’s likely why, for the first time in 10 months, border apprehensions rose slightly in February. The numbers from Tucson are already rising as the Ninth Circuit ruled that the “remain in Mexico” policy be halted for those who will now purposely come to Arizona or California. Will this administration really allow the Ninth Circuit to restart the border crisis? Remember, the open-borders groups have many more lawsuits in the pipeline. Are we really required to open our borders until the Supreme Court steps in at each stage of this game of lawsuit whack-a-mole?

And what about the coronavirus? At a time when we are shutting off legal travel from many places, are we really going to bring in thousands from Central America and even other countries through our land border and expose our border officials to a pandemic? Is there no limit to judicial power whatsoever?

Breitbart reported in February that 1,155 Chinese nationals were caught entering illegally at our border during the first four months of the fiscal year. While CBP does follow protocols to screen them, CBP declined to answer whether these aliens are held for the duration of the incubation period to rule out that they are carrying coronavirus.

“Consistent with these existing procedures to prevent the spread of communicable disease, individuals identified with symptoms of illness are referred to CDC or local health officials for additional health screening,” said a CBP official in a statement to CR on February 26. “Border Patrol agents are reminded of proper precautionary measures to protect against communicable diseases as recommended by the CDC.”

Thus, CBP was able to confirm that these immigrants are being screened at the border, but has not answered my follow-up as to whether they are being held for the 14-day incubation period before being released with a notice to appear in court.

As Todd Bensman of the Center for Immigration Studies reports, unlike with the Central Americans, extra-continental migrants are waived into the country pending adjudication of their asylum claims. In light of Trump’s shutoff of air travel from Europe, this might change, but clearly, weeks into this epidemic, the land border was not closed to immigration requests, even from Chinese nationals.

Chinese nationals coming to our border pose numerous potential security threats. As one border agent told me last year, he never saw a Chinese national at the border who did not run from him, but upon apprehension, they almost always claim asylum. Clearly, security and espionage concerns do not trump open-borders policies, but one would think a health epidemic coming from China itself would. One would hope that, by now, these people are being turned away from entering the same way Europeans are barred from traveling here.

Aside from the concern of losing the ground Trump took in deterring Central American families, the border data shows that there is already in increase in single adult Mexicans and Central American teens traveling alone, known as Unaccompanied Alien Children (UACs). These were two loopholes that were not closed under the new policies, because UACs are still waived in and Mexican nationals are obviously not a part of Mexico’s agreement to hold asylum seekers from other countries. But Trump’s complete power to shut down immigration applies to them as well. Aside from the security problems we have with UACs joining gangs, it is sheer lunacy to invite cross-border migration when our economy is melting down over coronavirus.

The amalgamation of all these factors makes this the most auspicious time for Trump to publicly and categorically vouch for his inherent authority to shut off immigration and to do so completely at the southern border. He should deploy even more soldiers and state unambiguously that no court can compel such a suicidal outcome, even if the courts had jurisdiction and were right on the merits. New caravans are already forming.

Trump is rightly shutting off travel to U.S. airports from Europe. Shouldn’t it be a no-brainer that all illegal immigration, even dressed up as asylum and “unaccompanied minors,” will be suspended at our land border as well? (For more from the author of “Air Travel From Europe to U.S. to Shut Down Over Coronavirus. but What About Our Southern Border?” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

WATCH: Trump Suspends All Travel From Europe for 30 Days; Mega Actor Tom Hanks and Wife Say They’ve Tested ‘Positive’ for Coronavirus; Worldwide Peak Will Come Next Winter, Scientific Model Predicts

By New York Intelligencer. In his address to the nation on Wednesday, President Trump announced that in an effort to stop new coronavirus cases from entering the United States all travel from Europe to the United States would be suspended for 30 days, beginning Friday at midnight. The president added that the restrictions would not affect travel from the United Kingdom.

“These prohibitions will not only apply to the tremendous amount of trade and cargo, but to various other things as we get approval,” Trump said. “Anything coming from Europe to the United States is what we are discussing.” Except that was not what the administration was discussing: White House officials later had to clarify that Trump bungled the speech, which Trump read from a teleprompter, and that only travelers, not cargo, would be suspended.

(Read more from “Trump Suspends All Travel From Europe for 30 Days” HERE)

______________________________________________

Mega Actor Tom Hanks and Wife Say They’ve Tested ‘Positive’ for Coronavirus

By Daily Caller. Tom Hanks and his wife Rita Wilson announced Wednesday that they both have tested “positive” for the coronavirus while in Australia for pre-production on an Elvis Presley film.

“Hello, folks,” the 63-year-old actor tweeted in a lengthy message to his millions of followers about coronavirus. The post was noted by Deadline magazine. “Rita [Wilson] and I are down here in Australia. We felt a bit tired, like we had colds, and some body aches.”

“Rita had some chills that came and went,” he added. “Slight fevers too. To play things right, as is needed in the world right now, we were tested for the Coronavirus, and were found to be positive.”

(Read more from “Mega Actor Tom Hanks and Wife Say They’ve Tested ‘Positive’ for Coronavirus” HERE)

______________________________________________

Coronavirus: Worldwide Peak Will Come Next Winter, Scientific Model Predicts

By Sky News. Scientists are warning that even if coronavirus transmissions dip as we head into the spring and summer, such a reduction shouldn’t be mistaken for an end to the outbreak.

Instead a reduction of cases during the summer should be seen as a precious opportunity to prepare for next winter, when a new model suggests the virus could infect 100 times more people.

In a paper currently undergoing peer-review, research scientists from universities in Basel and Stockholm have modelled the effects of seasonal variation on COVID-19 – the prevalent strain of coronavirus – transmission rates.

Their model suggests we are currently experiencing a “small peak in early 2020 in temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere” which will be followed by “a larger peak in winter 2020-21”.

Based on other coronaviruses, the researchers believe the transmission rate will indeed drop as we head into spring and summer but then rise again, infecting as many as a 100 million people in total. (Read more from “Coronavirus: Worldwide Peak Will Come Next Winter, Scientific Model Predicts” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Corey Feldman Accuses Charlie Sheen, Others of Sexual Abuse in EXPLOSIVE Documentary; Feldman Distraught After ‘Rape of Two Coreys’ Film No-Shows Online;

By Entertainment Weekly. Corey Feldman named names.

In his new documentary (My) Truth: The Rape of Two Coreys, which debuted on Monday night at a screening in Los Angeles, Feldman listed the men who he says sexually assaulted him and his friend Corey Haim when they were child stars. Among the names, Feldman alleged Haim had said actor Charlie Sheen raped him while making the 1986 film Lucas. . .

Several other people featured in the documentary also claimed either Haim directly told them he had been abused by Sheen as a child or they had heard word of it from others years later. . .

In the doc, Feldman first named three men he had previously accused of sexual abuse himself: Jon Grissom, an actor who had small roles in License to Drive and Dream a Little Dream costarring Feldman and Haim, nightclub owner Alphy Hoffman, and former talent manager Marty Weiss. He also said Dominick Brascia, a former actor and one-time friend of both Coreys who died in 2018, had sexually abused Haim.

Grissom reportedly previously denied the allegations in a YouTube comment. “I said it’s not me I’m sick and tired of saying that when no one listens. So goddamnit I’m not repeating it anymore,” he reportedly wrote, according to Page Six. Hoffman has not publicly addressed the allegations since Feldman first named him on The Dr. Oz Show in 2017 and EW has been unable to reach him for comment. (Read more from “Corey Feldman Accuses Charlie Sheen of Sexually Abusing Corey Haim in Documentary” HERE)

____________________________________________________

Corey Feldman Distraught After ‘Rape of Two Coreys’ Film No-Shows Online: ‘Everybody Here Saw What Happened’

By Fox News. Corey Feldman was supposed to release a new documentary on Monday intended to bring to light the names of the Hollywood players who allegedly molested and raped him and his late childhood buddy Corey Haim when they were kids.

However, despite tirelessly promoting and hyping up the worldwide livestream of “My Truth: The Rape of Two Corey’s” – and simultaneously screening the film at the Director’s Guild of America [DGA] in Los Angeles on Monday – Feldman’s flick never made it to Act One online as users immediately began reporting that they were receiving blank screens and infinite loading issues.

For $20, viewers could log onto mytruthdoc.com and were promised the full documentary on the livestream at 11 p.m. which would be followed by a Q&A panel afterward, and then a second screening on Tuesday afternoon. While awaiting the online stream to activate, Feldman tweeted from within the theater at the DGA, “THE FILM IS STARTING 15 MIN LATE DUE 2 THE WEBSITE CRASHING! WHICH IS ACTUALLLY A GOOD THING!”

Once again, the film was met with technical difficulties and after a brief conference with viewers in attendance, the decision was made to screen the film and “deal with the repercussions later,” Feldman told the packed room.

After about 18 minutes, Feldman and company stopped the film and told attendees that the site where the documentary was being hosted had been under attack by “hackers,” preventing the world from seeing the film. (Read more from “Corey Feldman Distraught After ‘Rape of Two Coreys’ Film No-Shows Online: ‘Everybody Here Saw What Happened’” HERE)

____________________________________________________

Corey Feldman Names Alleged Abusers in Long-Awaited Film

By Rolling Stone. . .A film that Feldman has been teasing for the better part of three years, (My) Truth finally arrives this week, chronicling the actor’s long journey to bring awareness to the plight of child actors who, he claims, suffer abuse at the hands of the entertainment industry. It is also, Feldman explained at the premiere, a chance to honor a promise he made to his former co-star and late best friend, Corey Haim, to “tell his story.” . . .

The documentary begins where Haim’s story came to an unfortunate end, with an audio recording of the 911 call Haim’s mother made after finding her son unresponsive in their Los Angeles home in 2010 (the release of My Truth comes on the 10th anniversary of Haim’s death). The actor, 38, was pronounced dead a few hours later, with the Los Angeles County Coroner’s Office ruling his death due to pneumonia, debunking initial reports that Haim may have overdosed. . .

In the new documentary, however, Feldman breaks his silence. In a scene that drew gasps from the audience at the premiere, Feldman names Charlie Sheen as Haim’s alleged rapist, with a detailed account that includes references to Crisco as lube, and two trailers that Feldman says hid the sex act from public view. The alleged assault happened, Feldman claims, on the set of Lucas, a coming-of-age film that cast Sheen’s “Cappie” as a protector of sorts for Haim’s titular character. The film — which also starred Winona Ryder and Courtney Thorne-Smith, among others — was released in 1986. Haim was 13 at the time of the alleged incident. . .

Feldman had previously identified three other alleged abusers from his youth, calling out his former manager, Marty Weiss, for inappropriate behavior, along with Alphy Hoffman, the proprietor of the eponymous Alphy’s Soda Pop Club, a sort-of Soho House for kids that was popular in the late 1980s. In an appearance on The Dr. Oz Show in 2017, Feldman also accused his former assistant John Grissom of sexually molesting him. Grissom also worked as an actor for a short time, appearing in the 1988 film, License to Drive and 1989’s Dream a Little Dream with Feldman and Haim. All three men are mentioned again in the film, along with Dominick Brascia, a bit-actor that befriended Haim and Feldman in the Eighties. (Read more from “Corey Feldman Names Alleged Abusers in Long-Awaited Film” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Kentucky House Passes Bill Specifying Women Have No Constitutional Right to Abortion

The Kentucky House passed a bill Tuesday seeking to amend the state constitution to specifically state that women do not have a legal right to an abortion.

House Bill 67 passed by a 71-21 vote and now heads to the Senate. If approved by three-fifths of that chamber, the proposed constitutional amendment would be approved or rejected by voters in a state referendum this fall.

The chamber also passed House Bill 451 by a 70-23 vote on Tuesday, which would expand the power of Kentucky’s attorney general to regulate abortion facilities, including bringing civil or criminal penalties for violations.

Rep. Joe Fischer, R-Fort Thomas, the main sponsor of HB 67, said the constitutional amendment would “end the slaughter of unborn children in Kentucky.”

Fischer also criticized the landmark Roe v. Wade decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973 that legalized abortion nationwide, hoping that a constitutional restriction in Kentucky would kick in if that decision was ever overturned. (Read more from “Kentucky House Passes Bill Specifying Women Have No Constitutional Right to Abortion” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE