Federal Judge Out of Control: Trying to Sentence Gen. Flynn Even Though Prosecution Wants Charges Withdrawn; List of Officials Who Sought to ‘Unmask’ Flynn Released

By CNN. Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan on Wednesday asked whether President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn could be held in contempt of court for perjury.

Sullivan also appointed a retired judge to look into Flynn’s case and argue against the Department of Justice’s request to dismiss it. . .

Sullivan signaled on Tuesday he would open the door to third parties to weigh in on the case, but it wasn’t clear whom he would allow. Others have argued to him that the judge could sentence Flynn, essentially ignoring the Department of Justice’s motion to dismiss his charge.

Sullivan appointed a retired judge, John Gleeson, [to present] arguments to the judge “in opposition to the government’s Motion to Dismiss” and on “whether the Court should issue an Order to Show Cause why Mr. Flynn should not be held in criminal contempt for perjury,” the judge wrote.

Gleeson is a former Clinton appointee to the federal trial bench in the Eastern District of New York. (Read more from “Federal Judge Out of Control: Trying to Sentence Gen. Flynn Even Though Prosecution Wants Charges Withdrawn” HERE)

__________________________________________________________

Hannity Warns Biden ‘Might Want to Start Thinking About Getting His Story Straight’ on Flynn Unmasking

By Fox News. Sean Hannity opened his show Wednesday by reacting to the newly released list of Obama administration officials who requested to “unmask” the identity of former national security adviser Michael Flynn in intelligence reports during the Trump transition.

“Why in the hell did the Obama administration’s unmasking requests jump threefold from 9,500 in 2013 to 30,355 in 2016?” Hannity asked.

“Now, we know one part of the massive increase was targeted at Donald Trump campaign adviser, an incoming national security adviser, a man who has served this country honorably for 33 years in combat zones, and that’s General Michael Flynn,” the host added. “We now know he was unmasked a whopping 48 times by roughly two dozen Obama officials between Election Day, November 8, 2016 and the president’s inauguration, January 20, 2017.”

The host explained that the term ‘unmasking’ refers largely to the process of identifying an American citizen whose communications have been picked up by U.S. intelligence officials during surveillance on a foreign government, person or other entity.

In Flynn’s case, he was unmasked over his calls with then-Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak, which were picked up on wiretaps. That information was then leaked to The Washington Post in early 2017. (Read more from “Hannity Warns Biden ‘Might Want to Start Thinking About Getting His Story Straight’ on Flynn Unmasking” HERE)

__________________________________________________________

List of Officials Who Sought to ‘Unmask’ Flynn Released: Biden, Comey, Obama Chief of Staff Among Them

By Fox News. Top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to “unmask” the identity of former national security adviser Michael Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list was declassified in recent days by Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell and then sent to GOP Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson, who made the documents public. The roster features top-ranking figures including then-Vice President Joe Biden — a detail already being raised by the Trump campaign in the bare-knuckle 2020 presidential race where Biden is now the Democrats’ presumptive nominee.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama’s then-chief of staff Denis McDonough. (Read more from “List of Officials Who Sought to ‘Unmask’ Flynn Released: Biden, Comey, Obama Chief of Staff Among Them” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

FBI Serves Warrant on Richard Burr in Investigation Into Stock Sales Tied to Pandemic

The FBI has seized a cellphone belonging to Sen. Richard Burr as it investigates stock trades he made at start of the coronavirus pandemic.

The North Carolina Republican gave his cellphone up to the agents while they served a search on Burr at his residence, an official confirmed to the Los Angeles Times. Authorities are looking into whether Barr purposely dumped stocks on Feb. 13 as part of an insider trading investigation. . .

Burr took bipartisan condemnation after news of the sales was revealed. He is accused of using information he received from daily intelligence community briefings as the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman to inform his trading decisions. After he offloaded as much as $1.72 million of his holdings, Burr reportedly compared the growing health crisis to the 1918 flu pandemic at an exclusive Feb. 27 luncheon.

The Republican senator has maintained that he did nothing wrong and asked for the Senate Ethics Committee to conduct a full investigation into the allegations. He said in a statement after the controversy began that he “relied solely on public news reports” in his decision to sell a large percentage of his portfolio in 33 separate transactions. (Read more from “FBI Serves Warrant on Richard Burr in Investigation Into Stock Sales Tied to Pandemic” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

I’m an ER Physician. Here’s Why Abortion Isn’t an ‘Essential Health Service.’

Although we appear to be “flattening the curve” of the COVID-19 pandemic, with governors slowly lifting stay-at-home orders and hospitals beginning to schedule surgeries again, infection spikes in certain regions remain a possibility.

Throughout the coming months, we need to focus as a society on medical care that will not only help us survive but thrive.

Working in emergency rooms as an emergency medicine physician of more than 20 years, I’m particularly concerned that abortion activists have been promoting and advocating abortion as an “essential health service.”

An essential health service is a health care action or medical procedure that is essential to protecting the life of a human. But the truth is that rather than helping women through this pandemic, abortion is more likely to worsen the toll of illness.

Any decision about a medical procedure as serious as terminating a pregnancy must be made with facts and an assessment of risks. When medical equipment is scarce and many resources must be directed toward treating victims of COVID-19, continuing to perform abortions is medically irresponsible.

Here are three key facts:

1. The stress of COVID-19 adds to abortion’s emotional toll.

Abortion is known to result in mental health issues, and COVID-19 is likely to exacerbate those negative effects. Anxiety and fear have exploded during this time as many Americans suffer from prolonged isolation and economic challenges.

Calls to the federal mental health crisis hotline are nearly 900% greater than this time last year. According to Kaiser Family Foundation, nearly half (45%) of adults in the United States reported that their mental health has been affected negatively due to worry and stress over the coronavirus.

Combined with the emotional toll of abortion, the impact of this stress is amplified. Abortion long has been associated with serious, adverse mental health outcomes such as depression, grief, persistent sadness, and elevated stress—many of the same mental health challenges we are seeing from COVID-19.

Losing a baby, whether from abortion or a spontaneous miscarriage, causes emotional pain. Women who have abortions face higher rates of depression.

Data shows an increase in the number of suicide attempts by women who previously had an abortion. In fact, women who get abortions are at a 154% increased risk of suicide, according to the Southern Medical Journal.

What’s more, we know that women sometimes are coerced into abortion as a result of domestic abuse. Claiming that abortion is an “essential health service” only will minimize the emotional risks, fueling this cycle of violence and pressure.

At a time when domestic abuse afflicts more women than ever before, we need to respect and support women, not encourage them to get abortions.

2. Complications from abortion are more dangerous during a pandemic.

Complications from an abortion are a significant risk—even more so during a pandemic with an over-stressed health care system. I’ve seen firsthand the life-threatening medical complications that stem from an abortion procedure.

This type of crisis is often the result of abortion clinics not being equipped to provide the necessary emergency care. Instead, they send women to the ER.

Abortion itself carries risks of infection and increases the likelihood of women needing additional medical supervision and treatment. Also, blood loss, inflammatory stress, and other adverse outcomes from abortion can compromise a woman’s health and immune system, which makes her more susceptible to contracting a virus.

Chemical abortions, such as by the brand-name drug Mifeprex, are no safer. Typically 5% to 7% of women who undergo a chemical abortion require surgical follow-up procedures. Experimenting with an abortion at home—especially right now—is very dangerous.

3. COVID-19 doesn’t affect pregnancies.

I have heard from pregnant women who are worried that continuing a pregnancy during COVID-19 could be harmful. I understand their concerns, but the available data suggests that pregnant women do not suffer from coronavirus infections.

And as yet there is no evidence of vertical transmission of the coronavirus from mother to baby; the virus hasn’t been found in breast milk or amniotic fluid after birth. To date, the research shows that women infected with the coronavirus during pregnancy don’t have a higher incidence of compromised health or unhealthy babies.

Some women may be considering abortion because they fear that increased doctor visits and a hospital birth might expose them and their family at home to COVID-19. In actuality, abortion puts women at a higher risk of contracting COVID-19 than their pregnancy does.

Abortion has long-term detrimental effects on a woman, the data shows. Our nation desperately needs more love and hope, and less death and despair.

The reality is that if women who face unplanned pregnancies view abortion as the “healthy” option, we know that it is in fact a fatal deception.

As a physician who deals with death daily in the ER, I can say that death of any kind is horrific. I believe we can and must protect the lives of both the young and the old, and this includes protecting preborn human life. (For more from the author of “I’m an ER Physician. Here’s Why Abortion Isn’t an ‘Essential Health Service.’” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Don’t Count on Republicans Opposing Pelosi’s Panic Bill. Make SURE of It

There’s no way Republicans would agree to the new $3 trillion Pelosi bill, right? A $900 billion bailout for the states, $75 billion for mortgage bailout, $100 billion for a renter bailout, $25 billion for the U.S. Postal Service, a $100 billion bailout for schools that didn’t lose any money and actually saved on overhead, and another round of $1,200 checks for adults making up to $75,000 along with the same amount per child, even if they never lost any income during the shutdown. There’s no way Republicans will support this, right? Wrong.

Republicans already passed a bill pretty similar to this one, and the same man who negotiated that bill for Trump doesn’t appear to have a problem with new spending. CNBC reports that Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin was “unfazed” by the staggering debt we are amassing because of our strategy to deal with coronavirus. “One of the reasons I do feel comfortable with us spending all this money is because interest rates are very low. And we’re taking advantage of long-term rates,” Mnuchin said on CNBC’s Squawk on the Street earlier this week.

Doesn’t he sound like a used car salesman?

What Mnuchin won’t tell you is that one of the reasons we have failed to grow our economy at 3% any year since 2005 and 4% since the late 1990s is precisely because the existing debt already weakened our ability to use peak employment for efficient economic growth. We cannot possibly comprehend how the bills they already passed will alter our economy for years to come.

But the broader implication of Mnuchin’s comments is that Republicans and the White House, absent early and vigorous opposition from conservatives, will likely go along with some form of this new bill. That is what they have done every time.

Unlike the White House, Democrats actually practice one of the dictates of “Art of the Deal,” which is always to ask for more than you think you will get. This is why they ask for slightly more money than they want and also stick in extraneous provisions dealing with other political priorities. For example, they originally only asked for a $500 billion state bailout and have now upped it to $900 billion.

Then Republicans, rather than militating against the entire premise of the lockdown and the faulty law and science behind it, as well as the premise of subsidizing unemployment and encouraging lockdown, agree to the entire strategy. However, they spend 100% of their time focusing on extraneous provisions of the bill or the exact dollar amount or structure of the socialist programs that they ultimately agree to.

Remember the GOP obsession with the Kennedy Center funding last time around? You would have thought that was the subject of the bill, judging by the rhetoric of Republicans during that debate. In fact, any sane person would have traded the Democrats a gold-plated Kennedy Center in return for not fueling and incentivizing a lockdown, bankrupting our nation, and creating monopolies for large conglomerates in every industry that we cannot even begin to imagine in the coming years. Republicans agreed to all of this before, and there is no reason they won’t agree again. In fact, Trump is already promising a state bailout to reward the states for destroying the country.

The first step for Republicans to properly fight the next legislative battle is to admit they were wrong to go along with it the first time. They must admit that the first $3 trillion bill they passed, along with the Federal Reserve shenanigans, will destroy small business in this country by creating artificial monopolies for large companies hooked into the orbit of the government – the same way Obamacare destroyed private practice and small insurers in health care, the bank bailouts destroyed community banks, and the recent farm bills destroyed family farms. Now, every industry will look like those three industries, where you can count the number of players on one hand. The bill passed by Congress will create more artificial inequality than anything a free market could have done in a thousand years.

According to researchers at the University of Illinois, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, and the University of Chicago, at least 100,000 small businesses will permanently close. What about the pathetic “stimulus” bills and Mnuchin’s promise of virtually free debt? Yeah, those market distortions actually hurt small businesses. As the Washington Post explained:

The result is likely to further shift the balance of power — and jobs — toward big businesses that have a better chance of surviving the uncertain year ahead by borrowing money or drawing on large cash reserves. Emergency actions by the Federal Reserve, backed by the Treasury, have made borrowing money almost free for large companies. In the 1980s and 1990s, small businesses employed over half of American workers, but that dynamic has shifted over time. By 2017, only 47 percent of private-sector employees were at small businesses, and the pandemic appears to be reducing that again.

Then there are the indiscriminate checks being mailed out to people who never lost their jobs. So much money was wasted that divorced families are now getting duplicate checks for the same child. Dead people are getting checks in the mail, as well as foreign nationals. $1 billion intended for small business wound up being mailed to public companies. Even nonprofits, including Muslim Brotherhood mosques, received funding. Has any Republican who supported the bill recognized the mistakes?

Once they recognize their errant ways, then we can trust them to actually fight the meat and potatoes (not just the gravy) of the Pelosi pander bill, conditioning funding on ending lockdowns permanently, targeting the money for reparations, not crony stimulus programs, and creating a true stimulus built on tax and regulatory cuts, not welfare. We need a paycheck bill, not a welfare and socialist monopoly bill.

However, that would require Trump to fire Mnuchin and actually appoint a negotiator who is somewhat different from what we would see under a Biden administration. Mnuchin is to fiscal policy what Fauci is to the lockdown policy – indistinguishable from the Democrats.

So yes, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Republicans might promise that this bill is “dead on arrival” in the Senate, but it’s only dead in this exact form. The more they focus on fighting the cranberry sauce and pecan pie of the bill, the more we will see them acquiesce to the turkey itself. Like Lucy and Charlie Brown with the football, this happens every time. (For more from the author of “Don’t Count on Republicans Opposing Pelosi’s Panic Bill. Make Sure of It” please click HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Devin Nunes Vows Criminal Referrals for Robert Mueller’s Team in Latest Russia Probe Reckoning

Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, vowed to pursue multiple new criminal referrals amid the ongoing fallout of bombshell revelations in the Justice Department’s handling of the Russia probe.

Referring to former special counsel Robert Mueller, Nunes said: “We’re looking at doing criminal referrals on the Mueller team, the Mueller dossier team, the Mueller witch hunt, whatever you want to call it. That’s where we are now in our investigation.” Nunes made his remarks in a special new episode of Fox Nation’s “Witch Hunt,” hosted by Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett.

Last year, Nunes sent eight criminal referrals to U.S. Attorney General William Barr alleging several “potential violations” of the law in the course the FBI’s investigation into Russian meddling and contacts with Trump advisers during the 2016 campaign.

Now in the wake of the Justice Department’s decision to drop charges against former Trump National Security Adviser General Michael Flynn, Nunes is turning his attention to the conduct of the special counsel, who was appointed after President Donald Trump fired FBI Director James Comey.

“We’re doing a large criminal referral on the Mueller dossier team that put together a fraudulent report — that knew there was no collusion the day that Mueller walked in the door,” said Nunes. “They set an obstruction of justice trap. There’s no doubt in my mind that we will make a conspiracy referral there.” (Read more from “Devin Nunes Vows Criminal Referrals for Robert Mueller’s Team in Latest Russia Probe Reckoning” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Facebook Created More Than 10,000 ‘Hateful Memes’ to Help Researchers Learn How to Spot Hate Speech

By Business Insider. On Tuesday, Facebook announced it has created a dataset of more than 10,000 “hateful memes” that will be made available to select researchers working to tackle hate speech online. The database was announced alongside the company’s latest community enforcement report — a report detailing the volume of harmful content that the social networking giant detects and takes down from its platform, from hate speech to illegal material.

Modern content moderation is heavily reliant on advanced machine learning and artificial intelligence — but such technologies typically need to be trained by being shown numerous examples of a particular kind of content before they can learn to recognise it reliably. The “hateful memes” dataset created by Facebook is intended to provide a readily available corpus of data for researchers who can then analyse it so as to build technology that can better detect it in future. Facebook also rebuilt the memes using licensed imagery from Getty to avoid copyright issues.

The dataset includes material that is racist, sexist, and incites violence, Facebook said in a blog post: “Our examples also cover a wide variety of protected categories (such as religion, gender, and sexual orientation) and types of attacks (such as inciting violence or portraying types of people as criminals or terrorists). The distribution in the data set reflects the real-world distribution found in the original examples.”

The memes are specifically examples of what is called “multimodal content” — content that derives its full meaning from taking different elements (e.g. text, imagery) into account at the same time. A meme might have a non-offensive caption and a generic photo, but once combined in a certain way they become insulting or hateful. (Read more from “Facebook Created More Than 10,000 ‘Hateful Memes’ to Help Researchers Learn How to Spot Hate Speech” HERE)

______________________________________________________

Facebook Removed 9.6M Posts for Hate Speech in q1, Warns of Coronavirus Impact on Content Moderation

By Yahoo Finance. (NASDAQ: FB) in its Community Standards Enforcement Report on Tuesday said it removed 9.6 million posts in the first three months of 2020 for hate speech.

Automated Systems Speed Up The Process

This is a 68.4% increase over the previous quarter where it removed 5.7 million posts, and 134% increase year-on-year from the first quarter of 2019 where it removed 4.1 million posts.

“We expanded our proactive detection technology for hate speech to new languages, in addition to making improvements to our English detection technology,” Facebook said in the report. “Our proactive rate also increased as a result.”

The social media company said there were 1.3 million appeals against its decision on removing the posts, and it restored about 63,600 of them as a result. (Read more from “Facebook Removed 9.6M Posts for Hate Speech in q1, Warns of Coronavirus Impact on Content Moderation” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Woman Mauled to Death by Her Rescue French Bulldog

An Illinois woman was likely viciously mauled to death inside her home by her own rescue French bulldog, according to authorities.

Lisa Urso, 52, was found dead at her home in Ingleside, located in the northern part of the state about 60 miles from both Chicago and Milwaukee in opposite directions.

Officers who responded to the scene after 4:43 p.m. Saturday found her mutilated body on the back porch, Fox Lake Police Chief Jimmy Lee said.

An autopsy confirmed she died from injuries sustained when her dog attacked her. The coroner’s office said the attack began inside the home but Urso managed to make it out to the porch, where she died, the Chicago Sun-Times reported.

The coroner said the rescue dog had previously been used to fight, according to WGN. (Read more from “Woman Mauled to Death by Her Rescue French Bulldog” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Sweden Cared More About Islamophobia Than Saving Elderly in Nursing Homes From Coronavirus

. . .Sweden has a higher rate of deaths in care homes than Norway or Finland, and lockdown enthusiasts have struggled to explain why keeping bars open would be killing people in housing for the elderly.

But there is a crucial difference between Swedish, Norwegian, and Finnish care homes.

A decade ago, in Sweden, 13% of the workers in care homes were immigrants, while only 5% in Norway and 1% in Finland were. Currently, 28% of care home workers in Sweden are foreigners, but in Stockholm, where the real dying has occurred, 55% of the care home workers are foreign immigrants. . .

In an interview, Johan Giesecke, Sweden’s former Chief Epidemologist and Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), let slip the formerly unspeakable.

Giesecke admitted that Sweden had failed to protect the elderly, and noted that, “many of the people working in nursing homes are from other countries, they’re refugees or asylum seekers.” (Read more from “Sweden Cared More About Islamophobia Than Saving Elderly in Nursing Homes From Coronavirus” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

WATCH: Inmates Are Infecting Themselves With Coronavirus to Get Early Release

Since realizing COVID-19 was underway, headed into our lives, facilities, jails, and daily operations, Sheriff Alex Villanueva directed Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department employees to take precautionary measures for everyone’s protection.

Custody is a particularly unique environment in which to take these kinds of measures. Nevertheless, with a lot of consideration, new protocols, and collaboration with medical staff, we got it done. On Monday, May 11, 2020, during one of his virtual weekly press conferences conducted at the Sherman Block Building in Monterey Park, Sheriff Alex Villanueva outlined measures used to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in our jail system.

Unfortunately, through video surveillance, it was determined a group of inmates at the Pitchess Detention Center-North County Correctional Facility deliberately attempted to infect themselves with COVID-19. Multiple men were seen sipping from a single bottle of hot water for two reasons: To falsely elevate their oral temperature moments before having their temperature taken by a nurse, and to spread the potential of infection. The bottle and a secondary cup of hot water were passed among the men inside of a day room, which is a common area next to a housing area with beds, akin to the living room of a house or apartment. There was plenty of space in which to observe physical distancing, however, the men chose to interact close to each other, making their intentions obvious.

(Read more from “WATCH: Inmates Are Infecting Themselves With Coronavirus to Get Early Release” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE

Trump ‘Totally’ Disagrees With Dr. Fauci on Lockdown; Trump Criticizes Fauci’s Senate Testimony

By The Blaze. President Donald Trump voiced his disagreement with his own coronavirus task force director over his recommendations on further lockdown policies to stop the spread of the coronavirus.

The president was speaking to the media about lifting the lockdown restrictions when he addressed Dr. Fauci’s concerns about opening up too quickly.

“I was surprised by his answer actually because, it’s just to me it’s not an acceptable answer, especially when it comes to schools,” Trump said. . .

“We have to get the schools open, we have to get our country open, we have to open our country. Now we want to do it safely, but we also want to do it as quickly as possible, we can’t keep going on like this,” he explained.

“You’re having bedlam already in the streets, you can’t do this,” he added. “We have to get it open. I totally disagree with him on schools.” (Read more from “Trump ‘Totally’ Disagrees With Dr. Fauci on Lockdown” HERE)

____________________________________________________

Trump Criticizes Fauci’s Senate Testimony: ‘Not an Acceptable Answer’

By NBC News. President Donald Trump on Wednesday criticized comments Dr. Anthony Fauci made during a congressional hearing about the risks of reopening the country too soon as “not an acceptable answer.” . .

Trump has repeatedly contradicted Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, painting an overly rosy picture of a country that he says is ready to begin to return to normal.

Testifying by videoconference Tuesday before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Fauci warned of serious consequences if governors reopen state economies too soon.

“My concern — that if some areas, city, states or what have you jump over those various checkpoints and prematurely open up without having the capability of being able to respond effectively and efficiently — my concern is that we will start to see little spikes that might turn into outbreaks,” Fauci said in response to a question from Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the committee. . .

In a taped interview with Fox Business Network, a clip of which was released Wednesday, Trump said: “Anthony is a good person, a very good person. I’ve disagreed with him. I totally disagree with him on schools.” (Read more from “Trump Criticizes Fauci’s Senate Testimony: ‘Not an Acceptable Answer'” HERE)

Follow Joe Miller on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE